Download - Medical Board Hearing Transcript
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
1/323
0001
1 LICENSE NO. L-3154
2 IN THE MATTER OF ( BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY
(
3 THE LICENSE OF ( PANEL OF THE
(
4 RICK SZUMLAS, M.D. ( TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD
5
6 TEMPORARY SUSPENSION
7 WITH NOTICE
8 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 20, 2011
9
10 BE IT REMEMBERED that on this the 20th day of April,
11 2011, between 10:00 a.m. and 4:21 p.m., the above-entitled
12 matter came for hearing before the Disciplinary Panel of
13 the Texas Medical Board, 333 Guadalupe, Tower 3, 7th
14 Floor, Austin, Texas, and the following proceedings were
15 reported by Renea Seggern, Certified Shorthand Reporter.
16
17
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
2/323
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
0002
1 A P P E A R A N C E S
2
3 DISCIPLINARY PANEL MEMBERS:
4 Mr. David Baucom, Chair
Patrick Crocker, D.O.
5 Ms. Paulette Southard (Appeared via telephone)
6 Ms. Nancy Leshikar, Counsel for the Panel
7
8 FOR THE TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD:
9 TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
3/323
Mr. Christopher Palazola
10 Ms. Claudia Kirk
333 Guadalupe Street
11 Tower 3, Suite 610
Austin, Texas 78701
12 (512) 305-7071
13
FOR THE RESPONDENT:
14
LEICHTER LAW FIRM
15 Mr. Louis Leichter
Mr. Dan Lype
16 1602 East 7th Street
Austin, Texas 78702
17 (512) 495-9995
18
19
20
21
22
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
4/323
23
24
25
0003
1 W I T N E S S I N D E X
2 Appearances.............................................2
3 WITNESSES FOR THE BOARD:
4 DETECTIVE SERGEANT JAMES MAZY (Via Telephone)
Direct Examination by Mr. Palazola.................19
5 Voir Dire Examination by Mr. Leichter..............33
Continued Direct Examination by Mr. Palazola.......35
6 Cross-Examination by Mr. Leichter..................41
Redirect Examination by Mr. Palazola...............47
7 Recross-Examination by Mr. Leichter................48
Examination by Dr. Crocker.........................49
8 Further Recross-Examination by Mr. Leichter........51
Further Redirect Examination by Mr. Palazola.......52
9
MARK MESSER, D.O. (Via Telephone)
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
5/323
10 Direct Examination by Ms. Kirk.....................54
Cross-Examination by Mr. Leichter..................61
11 Redirect Examination by Ms. Kirk...................78
Recross-Examination by Mr. Leichter................80
12 Examination by Dr. Crocker............... ..........83
Further Recross-Examination by Mr. Leichter........85
13
KIMBERLY SMITH (Via Telephone)
14 Direct Examination by Mr. Palazola.................89
Cross-Examination by Mr. Leichter..................96
15 Redirect Examination by Mr. Palazola...............99
Recross-Examination by Mr. Leichter...............100
16 Further Redirect Examination by Mr. Palazola......101
17 BRANDI RUSSELL (Via Telephone)
Direct Examination by Mr. Palazola................104
18 Cross-Examination by Mr. Leichter.................114
19 WITNESSES FOR THE RESPONDENT:
20 GEORGE GLASS, M.D.
Direct Examination by Mr. Leichter................124
21 Cross-Examination by Mr. Palazola.................145
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
6/323
Examination by Dr. Crocker........................155
22 Examination by Mr. Baucom.........................159
Further Examination by Dr. Crocker................160
23 Examination by Ms. Leshikar.......................160
Further Examination by Mr. Baucom.................161
24 Examination by Ms. Southard.......................163
Continued Cross-Examination by Mr. Palazola.......167
25 Redirect Examination by Mr. Leichter..............175
0004
1 GEORGE GLASS, M.D. (Continued)
Further Examination by Ms. Leshikar...............178
2
RICK SZUMLAS, M.D.
3 Direct Examination by Mr. Leichter................181
Cross-Examination by Ms. Kirk.....................196
4 Redirect Examination by Mr. Leichter..............206
Recross-Examination by Ms. Kirk...................211
5 Further Redirect Examination by Mr. Leichter......212
Examination by Mr. Baucom.........................212
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
7/323
6 Examination by Dr. Crocker........................214
Examination by Ms. Southard.......................216
7
Reporter's Certificate................................240
8
E X H I B I T I N D E X
9 FOR THE BOARD
NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE
10
1 Notice of Hearing 17
11
2 Application for Temporary Suspension or
12 Restriction of License With Notice 17
13 3 Public Physician Verification 17
14 4 Complaint Documents 17
15 5 Correspondence, Complainant (Under Seal) 17
16 6 Correspondence, Board Staff (Under Seal) 17
17 7 Correspondence, Board Staff (Under Seal) 17
18 8 Terrell State Hospital, Medical Records for
Respondent (Under Seal) 17
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
8/323
19
9 Order Granting Temporary Suspension Without
20 Notice, March 18, 2011 (Under Seal) 17
21 10 Transcript from Temporary Suspension Without
Notice, March 18, 2011 (Under Seal) 17
22
13 Lakes Regional Medical Records (Under Seal) 17
23
14 Color Photos 38
24
25
0005
1 E X H I B I T I N D E X
FOR THE RESPONDENT
2 NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE
3 1 Psychiatric Evaluation of Dr. Szumlas by
Dr. George Glass 144
4
2 Resume for George S. Glass, M.D., P.A. 129
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
9/323
5
3 Letter of Reference from Dr. Shafiq 124
6
4 Letter of Reference from Dr. Prakash 124
7
5 Letter of Reference from Dr. Thurmond 124
8
6 Letter of Reference from Dr. Petrakian 124
9
7 Letter of Reference from Dr. O'Neal 124
10
8 Continuing Medical Education Certificate 124
11
9 Continuing Medical Education Certificate 124
12
10 Letter from Lynda Sessa 124
13
11 Letter from Helen Gootinag 124
14
12 Certificate from the Institute for Cardiovascular
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
10/323
15 CC Certification 124
16 13 Certificate from the Society of Cardiovascular
Computed Tomography 124
17
14 Continuing Medical Education Credit Form 124
18
15 Continuing Medical Education Registration 124
19
16 Certificate from the University of Virginia
20 Health System 124
21 17 Continuing Medical Education Certificate from
22 SNM 124
23 18 Certificate from the American College of
Cardiology Foundation 124
24
19 Continuing Medical Education Tracker from January
25 2010 until December 2010 124
0006
1 P R O C E E D I N G S
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
11/323
2 MR. BAUCOM: I call this meeting of the
3 Disciplinary Panel of the Texas Medical Board to order at
4 10:00 a.m. on the 20th day of April 2011.
5 My name is David Baucom. I've been
6 appointed to be Chair of this Disciplinary Panel. The
7 other Panel members are Patrick Crocker, D.O., and
8 Paulette Southard. Nancy Leshikar, general counsel, will
9 serve as hearings counsel for the Panel in today's
10 proceedings.
11 The hearings counsel will call the roll.
12 MS. LESHIKAR: David Baucom?
13 MR. BAUCOM: Here.
14 MS. LESHIKAR: Dr. Crocker?
15 DR. CROCKER: Here.
16 MS. LESHIKAR: Ms. Southard?
17 MS. SOUTHARD: Present.
18 MS. LESHIKAR: Mr. Chair, all members of the
19 Disciplinary Panel are present.
20 MR. BAUCOM: I call the case of the Matter
21 of the Texas Medical License of Rick Szumlas, M.D. The
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
12/323
22 Panel is here to consider the Application for the
23 Temporary Suspension With Notice filed with Board staff
24 under the authority of Section 164.059, Texas Occupations
25 Code, and Board Rule, Chapter 187, Subchapter F.
0007
1 I remind this Disciplinary Panel members
2 that each of us have a duty to be fair and impartial in
3 our decision in this matter. Board Rule 187.42(b) sets
4 forth the standards for recusal. If there is any request
5 for recusal, please make that request now.
6 MS. SOUTHARD: No.
7 MR. BAUCOM: The record will reflect there
8 is no request for recusal.
9 I now request that the parties and attorneys
10 in this hearing identify themselves for the record.
11 MR. LEICHTER: Louis Leichter,
12 L-e-i-c-h-t-e-r, first name L-o-u-i-s, for Respondent,
13 Rick Szumlas, M.D.
14 MR. PALAZOLA: Chris Palazola for Board
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
13/323
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
14/323
9 and four witnesses, and we will need approximately three
10 hours.
11 MR. LEICHTER: We will be calling between
12 two and four witnesses. We also need approximately two to
13 four hours.
14 There is a procedural note that I would like
15 to bring up on the record at some point before we begin
16 the evidentiary matter and when the Panel decides it's
17 appropriate to take it up.
18 MR. BAUCOM: Would this be a good time?
19 MS. LESHIKAR: Yes.
20 MR. LEICHTER: We realize that the Rule
21 requires or allows for the provision the -- the Rule
22 requires or provides for Ms. Southard to appear by
23 telephone. However, because this is a Temporary
24 Suspension Hearing With Notice, it is an evidentiary
25 hearing, we acknowledge Ms. Southard's presence. We would
0009
1 ask that appearances that regard credibility, which is the
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
15/323
2 appearance of a witness, their demeanor, their gestures,
3 their body language, their credibility largely be deferred
4 to these Panel members with decision and input being made
5 to Ms. Southard because she's not here to judge the
6 demeanor and character and credibility of these witnesses.
7 And this is a very important matter and
8 these witnesses, including Dr. Szumlas, who will testify
9 either called by staff or called by us, is very important
10 and goes to the nature of the facts in issue of this case.
11 We want to preserve that for the record.
12 Thank you.
13 MS. LESHIKAR: Noted.
14 MR. BAUCOM: Do you have any comment on
15 that?
16 MS. LESHIKAR: No.
17 MR. BAUCOM: Each side will be allowed 15
18 minutes to make an opening statement. Board staff has the
19 burden of proof and will be allowed to make the first
20 opening statement. The Respondent may make an opening
21 statement after Board staff's opening statement or may
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
16/323
22 reserve opening statement until after Board staff rests.
23 Each side will be allowed a maximum of four
24 hours to present their case. This will include direct
25 examination of any witnesses called by the party and
0010
1 cross-examination of any witness called by the other
2 party.
3 Each side will be allowed 15 minutes for a
4 closing argument. Board staff will make the first closing
5 argument and may reserve up to one half of its time for
6 rebuttal.
7 The Board staff attorney may now make an
8 opening statement.
9 MS. KIRK: At this time, the Board staff
10 would request that the Panel invoke the Rule.
11 MS. LESHIKAR: All right. Panel, impose the
12 Rule.
13 MR. LEICHTER: We only have one witness who
14 is here with us who would not appear, which is Dr. Glass.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
17/323
15 And because he's an expert, we ask that he be exempted
16 from the Rule because his very testimony goes to the
17 nature of these proceedings. We feel that him listening
18 to the testimony, because he's already interviewed the
19 Respondent in this matter, would be helpful to the Panel
20 in deliberation. Under the rules and case law in Texas,
21 he should be exempted from the Rule.
22 MS. KIRK: He's not a party to these
23 proceedings, and the Rule is really for necessary parties.
24 So we would ask that he be excused.
25 MS. LESHIKAR: Panel, under the Rule,
0011
1 everybody that's going to be a fact witness is excused
2 except for --
3 MS. SOUTHARD: I'm not able to hear what is
4 being said.
5 MS. LESHIKAR: Under the Rule, when you
6 invoke the Rule, what you are asking is that all witnesses
7 that are going to testify in the hearing be excused from
8 the testimony. And so now what Mr. Leichter has argued is
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
18/323
9 he has an expert witness and as such the expert witness
10 should be excluded from the invocation from the Rule.
11 It is up to you-all to determine if you
12 believe that is appropriate or not. It is my opinion that
13 he should not be allowed in the room. Simply because he's
14 an expert witness does not, in fact, excuse him from the
15 Rule. But it is up to you to make that decision.
16 MR. BAUCOM: I would follow your
17 recommendation, then.
18 MS. SOUTHARD: As do I.
19 MS. LESHIKAR: He will be subject to the
20 Rule as well.
21 MR. LEICHTER: Can someone escort him down
22 to the sixth floor.
23 MR. BAUCOM: Board staff attorney may now
24 offer documentary evidence.
25 MS. LESHIKAR: They haven't made their
0012
1 opening statement yet.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
19/323
2 MS. KIRK: Can you excuse Mr. Bernardo as
3 well? He may be a potential witness.
4 MS. LESHIKAR: Mr. Bernardo.
5 MS. KIRK: Thank you. A physician who is a
6 threat to the general health and welfare to the public due
7 to an impairment cannot be allowed to practice with a
8 completely unrestricted license. Allowing an impaired
9 physician to practice in that condition would go against
10 this Board's mission, which is to protect the people and
11 the state of Texas.
12 Approximately six months ago, Dr. Szumlas,
13 the Respondent, who lives alone in an apartment, started
14 to believe that satellites were beaming radioactive waves
15 into his apartment. He also heard voices that conversed
16 and provided running commentary as to what he was doing
17 and what was going on around him. He believes the Food
18 and Drug Administration or the military or other
19 government agencies is doing this to him.
20 You will see and hear evidence today that he
21 made several calls to the police using the 911 emergency
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
20/323
22 system to report the harassment and satellite activity.
23 His apartment has sophisticated electronic equipment set
24 up; that he slept with reflective equipment to deflect the
25 beams that were supposedly being transmitted to his head;
0013
1 and that he purchased a semiautomatic pistol and had a
2 large knife for protection.
3 We will also present evidence that due to
4 his impaired mental state, Respondent had to be
5 involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital. You
6 will hear from his doctor who will testify that Respondent
7 suffers from a psychotic disorder and had to be treated
8 with anti-psychotic medication.
9 You will also see that even at discharge,
10 not too long ago, while on medication, he still had
11 symptoms of psychosis. We will also present evidence that
12 this type of disorder has a high relapse rate and requires
13 compliance with the prescribed medication.
14 Once you hear all our evidence, we think you
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
21/323
15 will see that Respondent is impaired due to mental illness
16 and that he presents a continuing threat or a real danger
17 to the health of his patients, potential patients or the
18 public in general.
19 We also believe that you will find that
20 based on his state of mind and actions, terminating his
21 suspension today and allowing him to practice freely and
22 treat patients would pose a threat to the public safety
23 and welfare.
24 Thank you.
25 MR. BAUCOM: Does the Respondent prefer to
0014
1 proceed with an opening statement now or reserve the
2 opening statement until after Board staff reserves?
3 MR. LEICHTER: We will reserve.
4 MR. BAUCOM: Board staff attorney may now
5 offer documentary evidence.
6 MS. KIRK: At this time, we would like to
7 offer into evidence Exhibits Number 1 through 10. And we
8 would also like to add to Exhibit Number 7, the last part
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
22/323
9 of the chain of the e-mail that's missing. And we would
10 like to add an Exhibit 13, which is the Lakes Regional
11 medical records that just came in today.
12 MR. BAUCOM: If I understood you, Items 1
13 through 10 and adding the last part of the e-mail on 7
14 that was missing; is that correct?
15 MS. KIRK: Yes.
16 MR. BAUCOM: And then on 13?
17 MS. KIRK: Adding a new 13, which I will
18 give you a copy.
19 MR. LEICHTER: I don't have any of that
20 stuff. I would appreciate paper copies of 1 through 10
21 also if you have them.
22 MS. KIRK: That was on a disk.
23 MR. LEICHTER: I know. We prefer paper
24 copies.
25 MS. KIRK: I will see if Tam can get you
0015
1 some.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
23/323
2 MR. PALAZOLA: Are you offering any of these
3 under seal?
4 MS. KIRK: Yes, I am offering Exhibits 5
5 through 10 under seal, and 13 to be admitted under seal as
6 well.
7 MR. BAUCOM: What did you say about 13?
8 MS. KIRK: To be admitted under seal.
9 MR. BAUCOM: Okay.
10 MR. LEICHTER: 13 is the Lakes Regional
11 Medical Center?
12 MS. KIRK: Yes.
13 MR. LEICHTER: We object due to timely
14 notice. We have no objection to the e-mail. What was the
15 other exhibit?
16 MS. KIRK: That was it.
17 MR. BAUCOM: Does the Panel have a response
18 to the tender of Exhibit 13?
19 MR. PALAZOLA: Exhibit 13 was just received.
20 We had to subpoena the records. Respondent instructed
21 Lake Regional Medical Center MHMR not to provide them to
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
24/323
22 us, is our understanding. So we had to issue a subpoena
23 for those records. That came in after 5:00 yesterday.
24 We just basically had a chance to look at
25 them this morning. These are the Respondent's medical
0016
1 records. We have reason to believe he's asked for his own
2 copy, so he should not have any surprise as a result of
3 these records.
4 Also I didn't hear a specific citation to
5 any section of the Board rules or Administrator Practice
6 Act concerning Mr. Leichter's specific objection, so I'm
7 not sure exactly what the basis of the objection is other
8 than just unfair surprise since these are the Respondent's
9 records.
10 MS. LESHIKAR: Panel, it's up to you. I
11 would suggest that it is somewhat disingenuous for the
12 Respondent to have directed the hospital not to provide
13 the records and require us to subpoena them and then to
14 argue that they did not have adequate notice of receipt of
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
25/323
15 the records.
16 MR. LEICHTER: Excuse me. There is
17 absolutely no proof of that. We don't know where that
18 came from. That is not factually accurate, and I'd like
19 to hear if you do call the witness for them to make
20 evidence -- provide evidence to that point. That is
21 absolutely untrue. There is no documented evidence to
22 substantiate that.
23 MS. LESHIKAR: Mr. Palazola, do you have
24 any --
25 MR. PALAZOLA: What we could do, if the
0017
1 Panel is concerned about that, we could tender them for
2 admission at this time; and if necessary call the
3 necessary witness or attempt to lay the foundation for
4 those records as we proceed through the hearing today.
5 MS. LESHIKAR: That would be fine.
6 DR. CROCKER: I think they are important.
7 MR. LEICHTER: I was just apprised that Dr.
8 Glass, our expert, reviewed these records. So as such, we
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
26/323
9 think they fall into some kind of admissible category that
10 way, so we will withdraw our objection at this time.
11 MR. BAUCOM: Okay. Exhibits 1 through 10,
12 then, are admitted. The last part of the e-mail for
13 Exhibit 7 is in addition, and 13 is also admitted as
14 agreed.
15 (Board's Exhibit Numbers 1 through 10 and 13
16 admitted.)
17 MR. BAUCOM: Board staff attorney may now
18 call witnesses.
19 MR. PALAZOLA: Board staff would call
20 Detective Sergeant Mazy of the Paris Police Department.
21 We will have to reach him by phone.
22 (Phone call initiated.)
23 MR. LEICHTER: We invoke that he be asked
24 whether or not he's in a room by himself and whether or
25 not anyone else is listening to him, watching him testify
0018
1 and whether or not any other witness who might be
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
27/323
2 testifying in this proceeding be removed.
3 MR. PALAZOLA: Detective Mazy, I think you
4 are going to be given some instructions and sworn in by
5 hearings counsel. We are in the room right now.
6 THE WITNESS: Okay.
7 MS. LESHIKAR: Detective, this is Nancy
8 Leshikar. I'm the hearings counsel with the Medical
9 Board. I'm going to ask you whether you are, in fact, in
10 a room by yourself?
11 THE WITNESS: Yes, I am.
12 MS. LESHIKAR: All right. And I would
13 instruct that you remain in that room by yourself and not
14 allow anyone else to enter that room while you are giving
15 your testimony. Is that clear?
16 THE WITNESS: Yes.
17 MS. LESHIKAR: Thank you.
18 Mr. Leichter, will that satisfy you?
19 MR. LEICHTER: Yes, and no one else is
20 listening to the phone conversation, right?
21 MS. LESHIKAR: Detective, is anyone else
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
28/323
22 listening on the phone conversation?
23 THE WITNESS: No.
24 MS. LESHIKAR: All right. I think we've got
25 that clear. He is by himself alone in a room with no one
0019
1 listening. Okay. All right.
2 Detective, I'm going to swear you in now.
3 (Witness sworn.)
4 MS. LESHIKAR: You are now under oath and
5 everything to be testified to will be the truth and
6 nothing but the truth, all right?
7 THE WITNESS: Yes.
8 DETECTIVE SERGEANT JAMES MAZY,
9 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:
10 DIRECT EXAMINATION
11 BY MR. PALAZOLA:
12 Q Detective Mazy, would you please go ahead and
13 introduce yourself to the Panel.
14 A I'm Detective Sergeant Jay Mazy with the Paris,
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
29/323
15 Texas, Police Department. I've been employed here almost
16 20 years.
17 Q In your capacity as a detective sergeant for the
18 Paris Police Department, are you familiar with the
19 procedures regarding emergency detentions?
20 A Yes.
21 Q Could you tell us briefly what an emergency
22 detention is and what role you play in that type of
23 detention?
24 A Emergency detention is basically a -- in this
25 particular case, as in most cases, it's either an on-view
0020
1 type of offense to where an officer believes that someone
2 is mentally unstable, mentally handicapped at the moment,
3 to the point that they are a danger to theirself or
4 others, and they require some type of hospitalization to
5 intervene.
6 Q And, Detective, are you familiar with a
7 Dr. Szumlas?
8 A Yes.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
30/323
9 Q How are you familiar with Dr. Szumlas?
10 A I was asked by my supervisor to do some follow-up
11 investigation on 911 calls that he was placing to our
12 agency.
13 Q And you talked about 911 calls that were being
14 placed to your agency. Let me ask you a few questions
15 about those calls, Detective. Does the Paris Police
16 Department keep a record of 911 calls that are received by
17 the police department?
18 A Yes, they do.
19 Q And are you familiar with that practice as to how
20 those are recorded?
21 A Not 100 percent. I know that there are audio
22 recordings that are maintained for a certain amount of
23 time and then there are written or recorded messages that
24 are typed in by the dispatchers when the call comes in or
25 goes out.
0021
1 Q If there is a particular individual that calls
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
31/323
2 the 911 system a number of times, are you able to access
3 those logs and review them?
4 A Yes, for the most part, yes.
5 Q At some point did you have an opportunity to
6 review the 911 calls that were made by Dr. Szumlas?
7 A Yes, I did.
8 Q And do you have a copy of those logs in front of
9 you now?
10 A Yes, if we are talking about the same thing, I
11 do.
12 Q Let me tell you what I'm looking at and we can
13 make sure we are talking about the same thing, we are all
14 on the same page. These would have been part of the
15 materials that were submitted to the Medical Board as part
16 of your complaint. I am looking at a log of 911 calls.
17 These are dated -- they've got a date on the top.
18 MR. LEICHTER: Excuse me. I would have to
19 object. We don't have a notice of these logs. We don't
20 have these logs in front of us. This is obviously going
21 to be a hearsay; it's not comment. We don't necessarily
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
32/323
22 object, but we would at least like to see what we are
23 referring to.
24 MR. PALAZOLA: These logs are part of the
25 exhibits that have already been admitted into evidence.
0022
1 MR. LEICHTER: As what number?
2 MR. PALAZOLA: These are part of the
3 complaint, which is Tab 4. These are for everyone to kind
4 of follow along. This is going to be Tab 4, Pages 2, 3, 4
5 and 5. And we can take a minute for Mr. Leichter to get a
6 hold of these.
7 MS. LESHIKAR: For the record, when was Mr.
8 Leichter provided with a CD of this Application?
9 MS. KIRK: He was provided with the CD
10 within the ten days' notice period. I believe it was back
11 on the -- I have to look at the --
12 MR. LEICHTER: For some reason, the disk we
13 have didn't work -- doesn't work. It did work. We copied
14 whatever we have, and I have paper copies of a large part
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
33/323
15 of the file. I'm not finding the 911 log. Give me a
16 minute.
17 MR. PALAZOLA: They look like this, Mr.
18 Leichter.
19 MS. LESHIKAR: Would you mind taking that
20 actual document over to Mr. Leichter to where he can see
21 it.
22 MR. PALAZOLA: Sure.
23 Is the objection withdrawn?
24 MR. LEICHTER: I don't have a copy of that
25 in the material we printed out. For some reason, it
0023
1 didn't make it. It is referenced in here, but it is not
2 in the printout.
3 MS. LESHIKAR: Is it on the CD that you
4 have?
5 MR. LEICHTER: The CD that I have doesn't
6 work.
7 MS. LESHIKAR: Did you inform staff that it
8 did not work?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
34/323
9 MR. LEICHTER: It worked in my office. I
10 printed it out because I don't like electronic copies.
11 And for some reason, I don't have the paper copy, so my
12 fault.
13 MS. KIRK: I was uninformed of any issues.
14 MR. LEICHTER: There were no issues. The CD
15 worked. I don't know whether we printed out everything
16 that I believe was on the CD.
17 MS. LESHIKAR: Are we now making copies?
18 MS. KIRK: Cynthia is making copies of
19 everything for Mr. Leichter.
20 MS. LESHIKAR: Let's go off the record for
21 just a moment while the copies are being made.
22 (Off the record.)
23 MS. LESHIKAR: Let's go back on the record.
24 Q (BY MR. PALAZOLA) All right, Detective. You are
25 looking at the same thing we are all now looking at. You
0024
1 are looking at the 911 logs. And at the top of the page,
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
35/323
2 it's got a date. I think these were printed on February
3 7th, 2011. And they have a Paris Police Department name
4 on them. Are you able to look at those right now?
5 A Yes.
6 Q And if I thumb through these, it looks like the
7 dates of individual log entries began on November 12th,
8 2010 and go through February 6th, 2011. Is that what you
9 are looking at as well?
10 A Yes, 11/12 of '10 and the last one was 2/6 of
11 '11.
12 Q This isn't the first time you have seen these,
13 today, is it?
14 A No.
15 Q Can you summarize for us what these logs reflect?
16 A Basically this is what the dispatcher types into
17 the call screen and -- of what the person is stating, and
18 I'm sure it is paraphrased.
19 Q And the nature of these concerns, who is the
20 person calling 911 in these logs?
21 A This is coming from Dr. Szumlas' residence.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
36/323
22 Q What's the nature of his complaint to the 911
23 emergency system?
24 A Basically that he's being harassed by electronic
25 or radio beams and that they are coming into his
0025
1 apartment.
2 Q And did officers respond as a result of these 911
3 calls?
4 A Yes. I'm not 100 percent sure about this very
5 first one, but I know the other ones that they did.
6 Q And have you had an opportunity to discuss with
7 those officers their interactions with Dr. Szumlas?
8 A I did speak to one or two of them. Sometimes it
9 might be the same officer that went out; sometimes it was
10 different officers.
11 Q And I am not, at this point at least, going to
12 ask you to relay the details of those conversations; but
13 to summarize, you had a record of these 911 calls that
14 were being made; you talked to the officers. At some
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
37/323
15 point, did you also receive a copy of a -- it looks like a
16 typed written document that had Dr. Szumlas's name on it?
17 A Yes, I did. That was given to me by our
18 supervisor or assistant chief of police.
19 Q When you reviewed that note -- do you have a copy
20 of that in front of you right now?
21 A I am looking at it, yes.
22 MR. PALAZOLA: For everyone's benefit, this
23 is going to be part of the complaint documents again.
24 This is going to be, I believe, Page 5 of Tab 4.
25 Q (BY MR. PALAZOLA) You don't need to read this
0026
1 letter to us. Everybody has a copy of this letter here.
2 But if you could just summarize briefly for us --
3 actually, let me ask you a different question, Detective
4 Mazy.
5 Is the information in this letter consistent
6 with the records and the 911 logs and your conversations
7 with the officers who responded to Dr. Szumlas's
8 apartment?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
38/323
9 A Yes, they both contain the same complaints and
10 details.
11 Q At some point, Detective, you filed a complaint
12 with the Texas Medical Board; is that right?
13 A I did.
14 Q And why did you file that complaint?
15 A Basically that I felt that he was -- Dr. Szumlas
16 could be a threat to his patients or -- by including the
17 public if this type of behavior was not checked or
18 evaluated by a professional medical facility or something.
19 Q Were you aware at that point in time that Dr.
20 Szumlas had obtained any weapons?
21 A One of the officers did make a notation in the
22 report that he had saw some type of gun inside the
23 apartment on one of these calls.
24 Q Detective, did you -- at what -- we talked a
25 little while ago about the emergency detention and what
0027
1 that process entails. At some point did you decide to
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
39/323
2 pursue an emergency detention of Dr. Szumlas?
3 A Basically in agreement with the chief deputy of
4 the sheriff's office, we came to the agreement that that's
5 what needed to be done.
6 Q Were you present at the time that Dr. Szumlas was
7 taken into custody as a result of that emergency
8 detention?
9 A Yes, I was.
10 Q Did you have an opportunity to observe Dr.
11 Szumlas while you were there?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Did you have an opportunity to observe his
14 apartment while you were there?
15 A Yes.
16 Q Detective, you actually took photographs of
17 Dr. Szumlas's apartment?
18 A Yes, I did.
19 Q And you made an auto recording of the event as
20 well, correct?
21 A Correct.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
40/323
22 Q Do you have a copy of your photographs in front
23 of you?
24 A Actually, I don't believe I do.
25 Q Are they somewhere where you can access them on
0028
1 your computer where you are sitting right now?
2 A I can go outside the door and look at them.
3 Q If you could obtain a copy, I'm going to show a
4 copy of these to opposing counsel, and you'll have a
5 minute to do that.
6 A Okay.
7 Q Thank you.
8 A All right. Hold on.
9 MS. LESHIKAR: Are these in the record?
10 MR. PALAZOLA: Not yet.
11 MR. LEICHTER: Are these for me?
12 MR. PALAZOLA: These aren't extra copies.
13 MR. LEICHTER: I'll object until I get
14 copies for myself.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
41/323
15 MS. LESHIKAR: We are going to go off the
16 record for a minute. We are going to be off the record
17 for a moment.
18 (Off the record from 10:29 a.m. to 10:39
19 a.m.)
20 MS. LESHIKAR: Let's go back on the record.
21 MR. LEICHTER: We were apparently sent two
22 disks with the same name, same information, Tab 1 through
23 whatever. Apparently, one tab was supplemented on one of
24 the disks and one tab wasn't supplemented on one of the
25 disks.
0029
1 When we loaded them, our computer said it
2 was the same thing. We apparently loaded one after the
3 other and it erased the other copies of the disk and
4 obviously printed out this. So that appears to be what
5 occurred.
6 MS. KIRK: We did update with the medical
7 records. There were two disks sent, but they all had all
8 the information on both.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
42/323
9 MS. LESHIKAR: You have the diskette and you
10 have the documents now, is that correct, Mr. Leichter?
11 MR. LEICHTER: I'm checking to see if it's
12 accurate. Apparently, Ms. Southard had the first disk
13 too.
14 MS. LESHIKAR: Ms. Southard has everything
15 as well. All right. We are back on the record.
16 Detective, are you still with us?
17 THE WITNESS: Yes, I am.
18 MS. LESHIKAR: Good for you. You are going
19 to talk about photographs; is that correct?
20 Q (BY MR. PALAZOLA) Before all this recess, the
21 question I asked you is, did you have an opportunity to
22 take photographs of Dr. Szumlas's apartment?
23 A Yes, I did.
24 Q Do you now have a copy of those photographs in
25 front of you?
0030
1 A I do.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
43/323
2 Q What I would like you to do, first of all, just
3 give us a general description of what you observed as you
4 walked into Dr. Szumlas's apartment.
5 A Basically the interior of the apartment was, I
6 guess, somewhat unkept. It looked like maybe someone had
7 -- it was like someone had moved in recently or it was a
8 lot of boxes and stuff maybe packed or unpacked. There
9 wasn't really any type of organization to anywhere inside
10 the apartment.
11 Q And did you see specific things in the apartment
12 that you thought would be a good idea to document with
13 photographs?
14 A Yes. The area that he described as his bedroom,
15 when I entered that was where I saw the large butcher or
16 kitchen knife. It was stuck into a wooden nightstand.
17 And this is where three -- I'm sorry, two of the radio
18 transmitters or deflectors, I'm not exactly sure what they
19 are, but this is where they were found.
20 Q And did you take pictures of the knife that you
21 just talked about and the radio deflectors or equipment?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
44/323
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
45/323
15 possession. If they were going to introduce them into
16 evidence, he should have provided them to staff and we
17 should have been given copies of them quite some time ago
18 so they could have at least been given to our expert.
19 This is unfair surprise outside the
20 requirement that notice be given ten days in advance with
21 the exhibits. I think we can establish that he delayed in
22 waiting to forward these to staff; that he had them in his
23 possession and he should have given them to staff a long
24 time ago.
25 MR. PALAZOLA: If I can respond, and if we
0032
1 need to hit mute, we can do this out of the presence of
2 the witness.
3 MS. LESHIKAR: Hit mute.
4 MR. PALAZOLA: There was a lot of
5 information there but, to me, a lot of these questions are
6 not really questions for Detective Mazy. A lot of these
7 are to be addressed by the rules of the Administrative
8 Procedures Act and the Board rules and are not necessarily
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
46/323
9 going to be within his realm as a witness to testify
10 about.
11 What is appropriate to voir dire the witness
12 about is whether or not these picture are a fair and
13 accurate representation of what he witnessed in Dr.
14 Szumlas's apartment. Once that foundation is laid, I will
15 offer them as exhibits into evidence. And at that time,
16 Mr. Leichter can make all of those objections he has, and
17 we can discuss that at that point. But I would recommend
18 that we go ahead and lay the foundation for these
19 photographs with Detective Mazy so we can proceed that
20 way.
21 MS. LESHIKAR: Mr. Leichter, I will let you
22 voir dire the witness solely as to the dates he took them,
23 whether he took them, whether they were a fair
24 representation of what he saw at the time. Those are the
25 only purposes for voir dire. Anything else that relates
0033
1 to the delay on the part of the staff to provide you with
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
47/323
2 anything is not going to be relevant to the voir dire or
3 the purpose of laying the foundation for those particular
4 paragraphs.
5 MR. LEICHTER: He did file the complaint
6 with the Medical Board. He admitted that, so I do think
7 that's relevant. Not to argue with you, but it is a
8 relevant factor in terms of his providing information to
9 staff.
10 MS. LESHIKAR: You can ask an additional
11 question when he provided it to staff. But in terms of
12 providing the basic fundamental foundation for admitting
13 photographs into the record, that is going to be the
14 extent of what you can do. We are not going to be going
15 into any other discussion about to the appropriateness of
16 when you did or did not get those exhibits.
17 All right. Unmute.
18 MR. LEICHTER: Thank you.
19 VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION
20 BY MR. LEICHTER:
21 Q Detective?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
48/323
22 A Yes.
23 Q This is Louis Leichter. I represent Dr. Szumlas.
24 When did you take these photographs?
25 A They should have been taken on the day he was
0034
1 taken into custody, which was on the 16th, I believe.
2 Yes, March 16th.
3 Q And that March 16th date is so indicated in the
4 right-hand corner in yellow print, is it not?
5 A It is.
6 Q And I take it these photographs were taken with a
7 digital instrument, digital camera?
8 A Yes.
9 Q And that means they were processed and available
10 for review right away; were they not?
11 A Yes.
12 MS. LESHIKAR: That's beyond the question.
13 You can say when he filed -- ask when he filed them with
14 the Board.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
49/323
15 Q (BY MR. LEICHTER) At what point did you provide
16 these documents to staff?
17 A Yesterday.
18 Q Did you provide these documents to anyone else,
19 such as the individuals in conjunction with the commitment
20 paperwork that was provided to the District Court?
21 A No.
22 MR. LEICHTER: That does it.
23 MS. LESHIKAR: Detective -- does that
24 complete your voir dire?
25 MR. LEICHTER: It does.
0035
1 MS. LESHIKAR: Are there any other
2 questions?
3 MR. PALAZOLA: Yes.
4 CONTINUED DIRECT EXAMINATION
5 BY MR. PALAZOLA:
6 Q Detective, I'm going to go through these
7 photographs with you. We have eight of them. What I
8 would like you to do, because we are doing this by phone,
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
50/323
9 we can't look at them -- see exactly what we are all
10 looking at. We are going to briefly describe them and be
11 as concise as we can.
12 I have eight photographs. I have one of
13 what looks like a pillow with something that's been either
14 -- it was pulled out of the pillow. It looks like some
15 sort of foil. Are you looking at that picture?
16 A Yes, I am.
17 MR. LEICHTER: We will stipulate that the
18 photos are authentic and accurate representations of what
19 occurred. We object -- so we don't have to go through
20 this whole predicate foundation crap -- we object on the
21 notion that he was given lack of notice.
22 They were available 30 days ago. He didn't
23 provide them to staff until staff apparently probably
24 asked him about them. And it's unfair surprise. It could
25 have been reviewed by our expert. It's a complete waste
0036
1 of time and it's in violation of his rights under the
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
51/323
2 Medical Practice Act, Texas and United States
3 Constitution. Preserving the record.
4 MS. LESHIKAR: So you are going to stipulate
5 that those photographs are an accurate representation of
6 the subjects of which they purport to show; is that
7 correct?
8 MR. LEICHTER: Correct. We object on the
9 basis -- for the reasons I just layed.
10 MS. LESHIKAR: All right. Now, would you
11 like to respond to his objection?
12 MR. PALAZOLA: The response to that would be
13 that first and foremost these are photographs of the
14 inside of Dr. Szumlas's apartment. Again, as to any
15 unfair surprise to the Respondent, these are documenting
16 what Detective Mazy is able to testify to, and these will
17 assist him in explaining what he saw in Dr. Szumlas's
18 apartment.
19 These are photographs. There is no
20 objection to the authenticity of the photographs. We just
21 heard that from Mr. Leichter. I believe they will help
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
52/323
22 Detective Mazy explain what he saw inside the apartment.
23 I think they will help the Panel.
24 As to any unfair surprise, we didn't know
25 they existed before yesterday. We couldn't make them
0037
1 available before then. If they are going to need a short
2 recess for their expert to review these photographs before
3 he testifies, Board staff would have no objection to that,
4 to have him review these at that point in time.
5 Other than that, I don't see how there's
6 undue prejudice to the Respondent for introducing
7 photographs of his own apartment.
8 MS. LESHIKAR: Panel, I would recommend that
9 Mr. Leichter's objection be overruled.
10 MR. BAUCOM: Fine. Ms. Southard, did you
11 hear that okay?
12 MS. SOUTHARD: I second.
13 MS. LESHIKAR: She said she seconded.
14 MR. BAUCOM: Do you concur?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
53/323
15 MS. SOUTHARD: Yes, I do.
16 MS. LESHIKAR: Mr. Leichter, your objection
17 is overruled.
18 And now you do not have to go through the
19 entirety of proving those up. Perhaps you would like to
20 admit them and have the Panel be able to look at them.
21 MR. PALAZOLA: Yes, at this time, Board
22 staff would ask that the eight photographs taken by Dr.
23 Mazy [sic] be offered into evidence as Exhibit 14 -- Tab
24 14.
25 MS. LESHIKAR: Okay.
0038
1 (Board's Exhibit Number 14 admitted.)
2 MS. LESHIKAR: Do we have an extra copy for
3 me by any chance?
4 MR. PALAZOLA: Yes, we do.
5 Q (BY MR. PALAZOLA) Detective, rather than having
6 you go through each of these photographs, I think you
7 described earlier that you that you had witnessed some
8 electronic devices. And I have some photographs with some
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
54/323
9 objects that look like they are hard plastic with antennas
10 in them. Those are the electronic devices that you are
11 referring to?
12 A Yes, it is.
13 Q And then I see there's -- you have taken a
14 photograph of a -- what looks like a large kitchen knife?
15 A Yes.
16 Q Where did you find that knife when you entered
17 Dr. Szumlas's apartment?
18 A That particular knife was stuck down into the
19 wooden nightstand in his bedroom, the same place where the
20 pillow is located.
21 Q I see a picture of a box that says it's for a
22 Ruger LCP. Is that a box for a handgun?
23 A Yes, it is.
24 Q Did you find a handgun in Dr. Szumlas's
25 apartment?
0039
1 A Yes, inside the apartment in the kitchen area.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
55/323
2 Q What was inside -- you have a picture of what
3 looks like the inside of that box. What did you find
4 inside the box?
5 A The box was two -- inside the white box you see
6 there is two boxes of ammunition somewhat. There's 50
7 rounds per box. The locking mechanism that goes to the
8 handgun, and I guess that's some type of stopwatch or
9 something that was in there.
10 Q I think I was asking you before we had an
11 objection about what was in Dr. Szumlas' pillow. Could
12 you -- and I do see a photograph of that. Can you
13 describe what you found in Dr. Szumlas' pillow?
14 A That basically is the same type of product that
15 you see people putting in the windshield of their cars to
16 reflect the sun's rays to the interior of the car. And
17 that's the same item you see behind the headboard there,
18 blue in color.
19 Q And in addition to taking photographs and
20 observing the apartment, did you -- were you present
21 during Dr. Szumlas' conversation with you and the other
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
56/323
22 officers?
23 A Yes.
24 Q And what was Dr. Szumlas' response when you
25 arrived at the scene?
0040
1 A Basically he was kind of cordial and kind of glad
2 to see us, that his request for something to be done about
3 the situation he has been alleging. He thought that's
4 what we were there for, to take care of the problems with
5 the ultrasound or radio waves.
6 Q At some point did you advise him or did one of
7 the officers on the scene advise him that he was actually
8 under a warrant to be taken in for treatment?
9 A Yes.
10 Q What was his response to that?
11 A I don't recall verbatim, but he basically didn't
12 -- wasn't sure that that was legal to be done to him or
13 against him. But after that, he was very cordial and said
14 he understood. So there was no -- not any argument or
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
57/323
15 anything verbal or physical in his response.
16 Q Did he indicate to you -- did he make statements
17 at that time that were consistent with the statements in
18 the 911 calls and the letter that was received regarding
19 the satellites and the advanced electronics?
20 A Yes, he was basically just kind of reiterating
21 about the radio waves and that they were actually in an
22 area of the house, where we were at was the worst part for
23 him to be getting those signals.
24 Q Did what you observed in Dr. Szumlas' apartment
25 on the date of his detention reinforce your position that
0041
1 an emergency detention was required?
2 A Yes.
3 Q Why?
4 A Well, in addition to him writing the letters, I
5 mean, he was personally telling us the same thing that we
6 had been receiving either by phone or in writing by the
7 letter; that this had been ongoing since February of last
8 year and it was still consistent with what was happening
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
58/323
9 on that particular day; that he was still seeing or
10 hearing or feeling some type of objects that apparently
11 were not there.
12 MR. PALAZOLA: We pass the witness.
13 MS. LESHIKAR: Mr. Leichter.
14 CROSS-EXAMINATION
15 BY MR. LEICHTER:
16 Q Officer, it's fair to say you wrote a report
17 regarding these incidents; did you not?
18 A Yes.
19 Q And that report is probably true and accurate in
20 every respect, isn't it?
21 A Yes.
22 Q And it's complete; is it not?
23 A Yes.
24 Q It's fair to say you didn't leave out any
25 pertinent details, true?
0042
1 A I'm sorry. Could you repeat that.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
59/323
2 Q It's fair to say you didn't leave out any
3 pertinent details; would you agree?
4 A Not that I'm aware of.
5 Q Because that's what good, trained police officer
6 activity involves, correct?
7 A Correct.
8 Q It's fair to say these photographs are complete
9 in every regard; are they not?
10 A Yes.
11 Q You didn't leave out any pertinent illustrative
12 depictions of relative evidence; would you agree?
13 A Yes.
14 Q So you don't have photographs of material taped
15 to Dr. Szumlas's window, do you?
16 A No.
17 Q These phone calls started in January of 2011; is
18 that accurate?
19 A They started November 2010.
20 Q So your testimony just now that it started in
21 February of last year is not true?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
60/323
22 MR. PALAZOLA: Objection, misstates the
23 evidence. His testimony was consistent with the 911 logs.
24 MR. LEICHTER: I think he can answer it. He
25 just testified. I heard him say that it was consistent
0043
1 with Dr. Szumlas's position that this had been occurring
2 since February of 2010; February of last year is what he
3 testified to. That's not what this record indicates. He
4 can answer questions about it.
5 MS. LESHIKAR: Detective, we will have Mr.
6 Leichter restate the question.
7 Q (BY MR. LEICHTER) When does your log of 911
8 calls begin?
9 A November 12, 2010.
10 Q When does it end?
11 A It ends on February 6th of 2011.
12 Q And there's been no calls since Dr. Szumlas's
13 discharge from the Terrell State Hospital, has there?
14 A Not that I'm aware.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
61/323
15 Q These calls didn't begin in February of 2010, did
16 they?
17 A No.
18 Q So you testified Dr. Szumlas was cordal?
19 A Yes.
20 Q And was cooperative?
21 A Yes.
22 Q Are you aware that Dr. Szumlas admitted to having
23 a psychotic break?
24 A No.
25 Q Are you also aware that Dr. Szumlas admits and
0044
1 acknowledges that what he experienced at that time wasn't
2 real?
3 A No.
4 Q So it's fair to say that you haven't received any
5 information since Dr. Szumlas's discharge from the Terrell
6 Hospital that indicates he's an ongoing threat to the
7 citizens of Paris, Texas; is there?
8 A No.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
62/323
9 Q In fact, you haven't heard any information on Dr.
10 Szumlas since his discharge from the Terrell State
11 Hospital, have you?
12 A I have none to my knowledge.
13 Q And was that gun loaded, Detective?
14 A Yes, it was.
15 Q It's not illegal to own a weapon in the state of
16 Texas, is it, Detective?
17 A No.
18 Q In fact, you didn't arrest Dr. Szumlas for having
19 an illegal weapon, did you?
20 A No, I did not.
21 Q Dr. Szumlas, you ran his criminal history, did
22 you not?
23 A I don't believe I did. I do not recall, and I do
24 not have it here in front of me. I don't think I ever ran
25 a criminal history.
0045
1 Q So it's fair to say that you have had no
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
63/323
2 interaction with Dr. Szumlas since you took him into
3 custody on a mental health commitment; is that accurate?
4 A I have not.
5 Q So you really have no way of knowing whether he's
6 an ongoing danger at this point in time at all, do you?
7 A I do not.
8 Q Is it fair to say, Detective, that there is no
9 record of any communication between Dr. Szumlas and your
10 department since March 18, 2011?
11 A None that I'm aware of.
12 Q Is it fair to say also that had there been
13 communication, you would probably be aware of it?
14 A Probably so. I would probably get some type of
15 notification from somebody if they knew that I was
16 involved in the case.
17 Q Detective, you indicated that Dr. Szumlas seemed
18 somewhat surprised or irritated that you were taking him
19 into custody; did you not?
20 A Yes.
21 Q That's pretty normal though, isn't it?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
64/323
22 A I would agree.
23 Q And once you apprised Dr. Szumlas of the reasons
24 for your taking him into custody, he acquiesced; did he
25 not?
0046
1 A Yes.
2 Q In fact, when you took him into custody, you were
3 in no way afraid for your safety, were you?
4 A Well, not at that -- not at the great amount, I
5 don't guess. We believed we had the apartment secured and
6 had him secured.
7 Q In fact, Dr. Szumlas displayed no violent
8 tendencies toward you or anyone else during this whole
9 affair; isn't that true?
10 A True.
11 Q Are you aware that Dr. Szumlas was getting ready
12 to move out of that apartment?
13 A No.
14 Q There were a bunch of boxes there and items being
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
65/323
15 packed. Would that be a fair description of the scene you
16 saw?
17 A That would be a description of what I saw, yes.
18 Q When is the last time you talked to staff with
19 the Texas Medical Board regarding your testimony today?
20 A Yesterday.
21 Q Is that when you apprised them of the pictures
22 you took?
23 A Yes.
24 MR. LEICHTER: Pass the witness.
25 MS. LESHIKAR: Is there any redirect?
0047
1 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
2 BY MR. PALAZOLA:
3 Q Detective Mazy, I have a couple of follow-up
4 questions. When Dr. Szumlas -- you were just asked if he
5 was surprised and irritated and if that was unusual. Did
6 Dr. Szumlas offer any of his own opinions regarding
7 whether or not he felt he needed treatment, if you recall?
8 A I apologize. Could you repeat that, please.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
66/323
9 Q At the time that you discussed with Dr. Szumlas
10 that you had a warrant to take him into custody for
11 treatment, did he -- what was his response regarding his
12 needing treatment?
13 A Once again, I don't recall exactly word for word
14 what he said. But he kind of -- he was surprised that we
15 were there, and as to why we were there, that there was
16 any type of -- he did not believe there was any type of
17 problem, you know, going on with him, that he knew of.
18 Q You were asked just a second ago, at the time you
19 took him into custody if you felt threatened. Did you
20 have any reason before, as you were approaching the
21 apartment, to feel concern for your safety?
22 A Yes, the other officers, like I said, have made
23 reference to that was some type of -- actually, that there
24 was a long gun. I don't know if it was a rifle or
25 shotgun, that he had seen on previous calls, leaned up
0048
1 inside the apartment.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
67/323
2 MR. PALAZOLA: And, Detective, I don't have
3 anything further for you. I am going to pass the witness.
4 MS. LESHIKAR: Mr. Leichter.
5 RECROSS-EXAMINATION
6 BY MR. LEICHTER:
7 Q Detective, you did search an inventory of the
8 apartment; did you not?
9 A We did a search. We did not do any type of
10 written inventory other than the gun that was taken in.
11 Q You didn't find a long gun such as a rifle or a
12 shotgun which you just described; did you?
13 A We did not see one, no.
14 Q In fact, you found no record that Dr. Szumlas had
15 ever owned such a gun; did you?
16 A I did not do any type of gun search on his name.
17 Q So essentially you found no record that Dr.
18 Szumlas had ever owned such a type of gun?
19 A No.
20 MR. LEICHTER: Thank you. Pass the witness.
21 MR. PALAZOLA: Nothing further.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
68/323
22 MS. LESHIKAR: Detective, you are now
23 excused from your testimony. I'm sorry. The Panel has
24 some questions.
25 EXAMINATION
0049
1 BY DR. CROCKER:
2 Q Hi, this is Dr. Crocker. I just have a couple of
3 questions to clarify his demeanor. At no time did he
4 brandish the gun at anybody?
5 A No.
6 Q And when he was asked to give it up, he gave it
7 up without any fuss?
8 A Yes, we actually found the box first and couldn't
9 find the gun, and he really didn't recall where he put it.
10 He said he thought it was in the kitchen, and that's where
11 we found it.
12 Q And the picture of the knife, did he ever
13 brandish the knife?
14 A No.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
69/323
15 Q Was it just laying on his kitchen counter?
16 A When we found it, it was -- the picture of it was
17 taken laying down on a counter. It was actually stuck
18 down into a wooden table.
19 Q Like a knife holder or?
20 A I'm sorry?
21 Q Like a knife holder?
22 A No, just stuck like you would just stick it into
23 maybe a chopping block or knife holder. It was stuck into
24 the wood, pointing down.
25 Q Okay. And those electronic devices, there's one
0050
1 that has six antennas that's hooked up to a speaker and
2 one that's just four antennas and a little blue box. Have
3 you ever seen any electronics like that?
4 A No, I have not.
5 Q So you don't have any idea what they are for?
6 A We asked him and he -- I don't remember exactly
7 what he said. They were either a receptive device or
8 deflective device. I'm not exact sure what his
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
70/323
9 explanation was for those.
10 Q When you looked through his apartment, you didn't
11 find any drugs?
12 A No.
13 Q Was there any alcohol bottles?
14 A No. None that I noticed. I did not -- there
15 were three of us there. I didn't do -- I may not have
16 searched someplace someone else did or looked.
17 DR. CROCKER: That's all I have.
18 MS. LESHIKAR: Mr. Baucom, do you have any
19 questions?
20 MR. BAUCOM: No.
21 MS. LESHIKAR: Ms. Southard, do you have any
22 questions?
23 MS. SOUTHARD: No, ma'am. Thank you.
24 MR. LEICHTER: I should be entitled to ask
25 questions, I believe, now in response to that.
0051
1 MS. LESHIKAR: Limited solely to what was
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
71/323
2 brought up.
3 MR. LEICHTER: Of course.
4 FURTHER RECROSS-EXAMINATION
5 BY MR. LEICHTER:
6 Q Officer, remember I asked you if you provided a
7 fair and comprehensive, complete report?
8 A Yes.
9 Q And you admitted it was fair to say you didn't
10 leave anything relevant out of that report?
11 A Not that I'm aware of.
12 Q And drugs, alcohol, weaponry, violence would be
13 relevant things, correct?
14 A I would think so, yes.
15 Q It's fair to say the absence of those things
16 indicate they weren't an issue?
17 A It merely states the fact I didn't see them or
18 didn't photograph them if they were there.
19 Q It's fair to say, isn't it, that if drugs,
20 alcohol or something else was an issue it would have been
21 brought up in the report?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
72/323
22 A I would think so.
23 Q And violence, officer threat for safety, et
24 cetera, if it was an issue would have been brought up in
25 the report, correct?
0052
1 A Yes.
2 Q And Dr. Szumlas was cooperative?
3 A Yes.
4 MS. LESHIKAR: Thank you.
5 MR. PALAZOLA: I may have to have one
6 further question too.
7 FURTHER REDIRECT EXAMINATION
8 BY MR. PALAZOLA:
9 Q Detective, if you recall, what did Dr. Szumlas --
10 did Dr. Szumlas tell you what the purpose of having the
11 knife in his nightstand was?
12 A The purpose was for his protection in case he was
13 somewhere in one room and his gun was in another room.
14 MR. PALAZOLA: That's all I have.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
73/323
15 MS. LESHIKAR: Mr. Leichter?
16 MR. LEICHTER: No.
17 MS. LESHIKAR: Detective, you are now
18 excused from your testimony. We thank you very much for
19 your time.
20 THE WITNESS: Thank you.
21 MS. KIRK: At this time, the Board would
22 like to call Dr. Messer.
23 (Phone call initiated.)
24 MS. KIRK: This is Claudia Kirk at the
25 Medical Board. You understand you are testifying at a
0053
1 temporary suspension hearing?
2 THE WITNESS: Right.
3 MS. KIRK: Now, the hearings counsel is
4 going to instruct you and swear you in.
5 THE WITNESS: Okay.
6 MS. LESHIKAR: Dr. Messer, this is Nancy
7 Leshikar. I'm the general counsel of the Medical Board.
8 At this time, you are going to be preparing to provide
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
74/323
9 your testimony. Is there anyone in the room with you?
10 THE WITNESS: No.
11 MS. LESHIKAR: Is there anyone listening to
12 this phone call?
13 THE WITNESS: No, ma'am.
14 MS. LESHIKAR: You are instructed that no
15 one is to come into the room while you are testifying nor
16 are they to overhear this particular phone call, because
17 we have invoked the Rule which means that others may not
18 be present while you are testifying.
19 THE WITNESS: Okay.
20 MS. LESHIKAR: I'm going to swear you in.
21 (Witness sworn.)
22 MS. LESHIKAR: Thank you. You are now sworn
23 and you are under oath.
24 MARK MESSER, M.D.
25 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:
0054
1 DIRECT EXAMINATION
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
75/323
2 BY MS. KIRK:
3 Q Could you please introduce yourself for the
4 record?
5 A My name is Dr. Mark Messer.
6 Q And what is your profession?
7 A Psychiatry.
8 Q And can you describe your training.
9 A Well, I completed medical school in Fort Worth
10 and then did a four-year psychiatry residency afterwards.
11 Q And how many years have you practiced in that
12 area?
13 A Approximately 13.
14 Q And have you worked with patients who have
15 psychosis or schizophrenic-type illness?
16 A Yes.
17 Q Approximately how many patients have you seen
18 with these type of conditions?
19 A Throughout the 13 years?
20 Q Well, how many do you see on average a week, to
21 give us an idea.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
76/323
22 A 20.
23 Q Are you licensed to practice medicine in the
24 state of Texas?
25 A Yes.
0055
1 Q Since what year?
2 A Until what year?
3 Q Since what year? When were you licensed?
4 A 2006, I believe.
5 Q Could you describe your current practice.
6 A I work on an acute care unit, acute care male
7 unit. And we have approximately 25, 28 patients on the
8 ward at any time, with a majority being schizophrenic.
9 Q And is that where you first encountered Dr.
10 Szumlas?
11 A Yes.
12 Q Let's discuss his admission to the Terrell State
13 Hospital. How was he admitted -- how did the admission
14 come about?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
77/323
15 A Well, my understanding, he had called the police
16 department and they brought him -- I'm not sure if it was
17 directly to Terrell State Hospital. That's my
18 understanding, though, that he was brought directly here.
19 Usually they go to a prior hospital for several days. And
20 that he was brought here and admitted to the acute care
21 ward.
22 Q And at that time, were you his main psychiatrist
23 during that whole stay?
24 A Yes.
25 Q Can you describe his symptoms on admission?
0056
1 A He was suffering from auditory hallucinations and
2 paranoid delusions.
3 Q And approximately how long did he have these
4 symptoms?
5 A Prior to admission?
6 Q Yes.
7 A Well, the admission evaluation recorded it as
8 five months.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
78/323
9 Q And when he came in, his first admission, would
10 you describe those symptoms as mild, moderate, severe?
11 How would you describe that? Please explain.
12 A I would say moderate to severe.
13 Q And based on those symptoms, did you make a
14 diagnosis?
15 A No, not yet. Not until discharge.
16 Q At discharge, what was he diagnosed with?
17 A Psychotic disorder not otherwise specified.
18 Q And what was your treatment starting from
19 admission based on his symptoms?
20 A We started him on the anti-psychotic Risperdal.
21 Q What dosage?
22 A We titrated up to three milligrams per day.
23 Q And is that a high dose, a medium dose? How
24 would you describe that?
25 A Medium.
0057
1 Q How long was he hospitalized?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
79/323
2 A 12 days.
3 Q Let's talk about his discharge. You were the
4 discharging physician, correct?
5 A Yes.
6 Q Describe his symptoms and demeanor at that time.
7 A Well, he was much improved. He appeared to have
8 clear, lucid, organized thought processes. He denied
9 having the thoughts or worries about the paranoid themes,
10 and stated that his auditory hallucinations had largely
11 resolved and that he was doing much better.
12 Q When you say they were largely resolved, meaning
13 that he may have still had some or not?
14 A It's possible that he may have had them at a much
15 reduced frequency and intensity.
16 Q Would you say he was stabilized or cured at this
17 point?
18 A Stabilized.
19 Q And as far as you know, he was living alone? He
20 was going home to live alone when you discharged him?
21 A To my knowledge, yes.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
80/323
22 Q Did he talk about having any friends or family
23 that lived nearby?
24 A No.
25 Q Did you send him home with any discharge
0058
1 instructions?
2 A Well, the emphasis was placed on compliance with
3 his medicine and outpatient clinic follow up.
4 Q And did he tell you how he was going to go about
5 getting those medications, and how he was going to follow
6 up?
7 A Yes.
8 Q Where was he going to go?
9 A I think he was going to Lakes Regional, which is
10 a mental health care center in Dallas.
11 Q Now, with this disease in general, the psychosis,
12 is it possible that even with medication you can still
13 exhibit some symptoms?
14 A Yes.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
81/323
15 Q Is it possible that it may take months to
16 actually find the right dosage to control the symptoms
17 adequately?
18 A No, it shouldn't take months to find the
19 appropriate dosage, no.
20 Q How long would it take to actually know whether
21 he's going to be stabilized on that medication?
22 A That's difficult to say. It could be as short as
23 five days or as long as several weeks.
24 Q So months? Okay. And what would happen if he
25 stopped taking the medication?
0059
1 A Well, there's a likelihood or possibility that
2 his symptoms would return.
3 Q And at the time he was admitted and he had these
4 symptoms, was he aware that he was ill?
5 A Well --
6 Q Other than what the police told him? I mean, did
7 he understand that he was psychotic?
8 A My impression was if he did, it was in a minimal,
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
82/323
9 mild way. Not a full understanding, no.
10 Q So if for some reason he stopped taking the
11 medication and he did revert back to these symptoms, it
12 would be likely that he would not understand he's ill once
13 again; is that a true statement?
14 A I would believe so, yes.
15 Q You said when he had minimal issues once he was
16 discharged. I'm going to read to you a statement that he
17 made after discharge. I would like you to tell me if
18 that's consistent with what he was hospitalized with.
19 The aliens were invading my head while I was
20 in my apartment and I went outside and sat in my car with
21 tinfoil on my head to block the rays, which is a total
22 fabrication and suggests to me possible guilt and
23 involvement on their part.
24 And he's referring to the sheriff's
25 department that reported this to the Board. Does that say
0060
1 anything to you?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
83/323
2 A This was a written statement after discharge?
3 Q Yes.
4 A Well, could you read the first sentence over
5 again, please.
6 Q Sure. Actually, I'll read the whole thing. I
7 just received -- I just received confirmation letter from
8 the Board regarding my temporary suspension and in it the
9 sheriff's department told the Board that I had called and
10 said, quote, the aliens were invading my head while I was
11 in my apartment and that I went outside and sat in my car
12 with tinfoil over my head to block the rays, unquote,
13 which is a total fabrication and suggests to me possibly
14 some guilt or involvement, question mark, on their part,
15 question mark, dot, dot, dot, Rick.
16 A Well, everything seemed clear until the last part
17 of the suggestion that they may play a role, with might
18 possibly point to still being paranoid. That's my
19 impression.
20 Q Did you have a chance to review the Lake Regional
21 records from his discharge?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
84/323
22 A Yes, I did.
23 Q Give me one minute to sort through my junk.
24 A Sure.
25 Q If you look on Page 27 on the progress note. It
0061
1 is dated 3/31/2011. It says, quote, unquote, Rick states
2 it is a fact, unquote, that radioactive waves are beaming
3 into his apartment and at times, quote, hears voices from
4 the radio. What does that say to you?
5 A Well, if he's meaning it -- that that was
6 happening at the time he made the statement, which was
7 approximately two, three days after discharge, then
8 obviously he wasn't stabilized completely.
9 Q And as far as his discharge, did he notify you of
10 a psychiatrist that he was going to see or a primary care
11 physician?
12 A Yes.
13 Q And did he give you a name?
14 A Not to my recollection, no. I mean, he might
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
85/323
15 have. I don't remember the name, if he did.
16 MS. KIRK: Pass the witness.
17 MS. LESHIKAR: Mr. Leichter.
18 CROSS-EXAMINATION
19 BY MR. LEICHTER:
20 Q Doctor, I take it you graduated from TCOM; is
21 that correct?
22 A Yes.
23 Q Did you do residency at the JPS?
24 A Residency in the University of Tennessee in
25 Memphis.
0062
1 Q Are you Board certified?
2 A D.O.
3 Q Are you Board certified in psychiatry?
4 A No.
5 Q Is that because you didn't take the examination
6 or didn't pass the examination?
7 A I haven't taken it.
8 Q And you are a full-time employee at the Terrell
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
86/323
9 State Hospital?
10 A I am.
11 Q Doctor, it not unlikely for individuals who
12 experience psychosis who, when they experience the
13 psychosis, think the events are real; isn't that true?
14 A Yes.
15 Q It's only after treatment that they are able to
16 ascertain truth from the false; would you agree?
17 A I would.
18 Q Now, you did not diagnose Dr. Szumlas with a
19 schizophrenic-type disorder, did you?
20 A No.
21 Q And no other mood-related disorder as well,
22 correct?
23 A I'm sorry?
24 Q No other mood-related disorder as well, correct?
25 A No, no mood component.
0063
1 Q You would expect, Doctor, that the symptoms upon
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
87/323
2 initiation of treatment with Risperdal would take some
3 time to resolve, at least a few days; isn't that true?
4 A Yes.
5 Q And they, in fact, did resolve while he was at
6 the Terrell State Hospital, didn't they?
7 A That was my impression, yes.
8 Q Because you, in fact, wrote a discharge summary
9 that was signed by you, Mark Messer, D.O., and it looks
10 like it was typed on 4/6/11 and dated 4/6/11; isn't that
11 true?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Do you have that discharge summary in front of
14 you?
15 A No.
16 Q Can you grab it?
17 A I have it on computer.
18 Q Let me ask: Do you need time to find it?
19 A Yes, please.
20 Q You can notify us when you have found it.
21 A All right.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
88/323
22 Q Thank you.
23 MS. LESHIKAR: Mr. Leichter, are you
24 referring to an exhibit in the packet?
25 MR. LEICHTER: It was State's Exhibit -- I
0064
1 believe the medical records was 13; is that right? And in
2 our package, it's reverse chronological order. It was
3 about Page 4 of the record. It's entitled, Physician
4 Discharge Order Inquiry, and it's a typewritten note.
5 It's three pages long.
6 MS. LESHIKAR: Did you say Exhibit 13? It
7 was staff's exhibit. What number did you admit it as?
8 MS. KIRK: It's all together from Terrell.
9 It is Number 8. The whole exhibit is Number 8.
10 MS. LESHIKAR: Thank you. I thought, just
11 to clarify, 13 is only from Lake.
12 MS. KIRK: Lakes Regional.
13 MR. LEICHTER: Sorry.
14 MS. LESHIKAR: All right. So we are on the
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
89/323
15 same document; is that correct?
16 THE WITNESS: Okay. I have it now. Sorry
17 for the delay.
18 Q (BY MR. LEICHTER) That's okay. We are probably
19 going to come back to it.
20 The treatment at the Terrell State Hospital
21 involves a multidisciplinary approach to help stabilize
22 and treat the patient; does it not?
23 A That's correct.
24 Q And you have nurses, other support staff, other
25 therapy providers who all integrate and report to you in
0065
1 order to provide you with appropriate information to make
2 diagnosis, treatment recommendations and discharge
3 planning, correct?
4 A Yes.
5 Q And all that is taken into account in your
6 discharge summary; would you agree with that?
7 A Yes.
8 Q So isn't it fair to say, Doctor, that there is no
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
90/323
9 mention of aliens or alien intrusion in any of the
10 discharge paperwork or medical records; that that wasn't
11 one of Dr. Szumlas's hallucinations?
12 A No, I don't recall anything about aliens.
13 Q Now, the statement that Ms. Kirk read to you
14 referenced aliens; did it not?
15 A I don't remember, to be honest.
16 Q Well, she just read it to you to try and get you
17 to admit that Dr. Szumlas was insisting that he continued
18 to have hallucination, and the statement contained aliens.
19 Let me find it and read it to you.
20 It said, who told the Board and I had called
21 and said, quote, the aliens were invading my head while I
22 was in my apartment and I went outside and sat in my car
23 with tinfoil over my head to block the rays, which is a
24 total fabrication. That's what she read to you; did she
25 not?
0066
1 A That's true.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
91/323
2 Q It's also fair to say that nowhere in any of the
3 records or any of the information provided to you in the
4 treatment of Dr. Szumlas was there a complaint regarding
5 aliens ever brought forward by anybody, correct?
6 A No.
7 Q So you don't know if Dr. Szumlas was objecting to
8 the fact that they were talking about aliens when that was
9 not what he had complained of; you don't know that, do
10 you?
11 A Right.
12 Q Would that change your opinion if that was the
13 fact, that he was just saying, hey, factually, that's not
14 accurate. I think you should have an accurate
15 understanding of what these facts are. Does that change
16 things?
17 A No.
18 Q Why not?
19 A Does it change that he offered the opinion on
20 aliens?
21 Q No, the fact that -- isn't it possible, based on
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
92/323
22 that, that he was saying, no, that wasn't the presenting
23 question upon admission. The presenting question on
24 admission had to do with my thoughts that I was being
25 followed by government surveillance. It had nothing to do
0067
1 with aliens?
2 A Right.
3 Q You don't know what that statement means, do you,
4 Doctor?
5 A Well, like I said, he didn't say anything about
6 aliens during his stay here on presentation or discharge.
7 I'm not sure what to make of the alien statement
8 afterwards.
9 Q So you don't know whether he was contesting that
10 those allegations were not part of the initial admission
11 criteria, correct?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Doctor, you would expect someone like Dr. Szumlas
14 to have symptoms such as those that he had prior to
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
93/323
15 admission, with a discharge diagnosis of psychotic
16 disorder NOS, correct?
17 A Yes.
18 Q Was it the treatment team's recommendation or
19 your recommendation to start him on the Risperdal?
20 A It was mine.
21 Q And you did note, at least the medical records so
22 indicate, that he started to stabilize after just a few
23 days, correct?
24 A That is correct.
25 Q And you hospitalized him a total of 12 days,
0068
1 accurate?
2 A Yes.
3 Q And it's fair to say also that he was probably
4 stable before discharge, but you kept him a couple extra
5 days in order to ensure that he was safe to go home,
6 correct?
7 A That is correct.
8 Q You said that he was much improved?
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
94/323
9 A I felt so.
10 Q And you also testified that Dr. Szumlas had no
11 thought or worries upon discharge, correct?
12 A That he had what?
13 Q He didn't exhibit any thoughts or worries about
14 being discharged; that the actual surveillance was real,
15 correct?
16 A He know -- to my opinion, he no longer felt that
17 that was an issue, yes.
18 Q You knew he was a cardiologist; that's clear from
19 your discharge summary, correct?
20 A Yes.
21 Q You didn't make any recommendation in there about
22 him returning or not returning to work, did you?
23 A Did I make a recommendation?
24 Q The report does not have a recommendation with
25 regards to him returning to work, does it?
0069
1 A I did not make any recommendation.
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
95/323
2 Q In fact, you specifically didn't say, don't
3 return to work, did you?
4 A That's right.
5 Q In fact, you testified previously that Dr.
6 Szumlas had stabilized while in the care and under
7 treatment at Terrell State Hospital, correct?
8 A Yes.
9 Q Let me ask you: Dr. Szumlas was a very complaint
10 patient; was he not?
11 A That's right.
12 Q And he was very cooperative with you, correct?
13 A Yes.
14 Q He was nonviolent?
15 A Yes.
16 Q In fact, a lot of the other patients who are
17 admitted into the facility were violent offenders; were
18 they not?
19 A That's true.
20 Q And Dr. Szumlas remained free and clear of any of
21 those kind of interactions with those individuals; didn't
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
96/323
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
97/323
15 overall health?
16 A I don't know. I don't know what his feelings
17 were in that regard.
18 Q Let me ask you, Ms. Kirk also read to you about a
19 note previously from Lakes Regional Medical Center wherein
20 she makes a quote that Dr. Szumlas purportedly made on
21 March 31, 2011, okay?
22 A Yes.
23 Q You don't know the context of that quote, do you?
24 A I have read it.
25 Q It states, it is a fact that radio waves are
0071
1 beaming into his apartment and at times hears voices from
2 the radio. You don't know whether Dr. Szumlas was saying
3 this was the nature of the reason I was admitted or that
4 he was still having those hallucinations?
5 A That's right.
6 Q Okay.
7 A It's one way or the other.
8 Q And it's unclear from that document, wouldn't you
-
8/6/2019 Medical Board Hearing Transcript
98/323
9 agree, or at least as far as what you have personal
10 knowledge of, what he was thinking at the time