Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Date 29/10/2015
The 240th
meeting of SEAC was held in Directorate of Environment, U.P. on
29/10/2015. Following members were present in the meeting along with Secretary, SEAC:
1. Dr. M. S. Khan Chairman
2. Dr. S.N. Singh Member
3. Dr. S.K. Upadhyay Member
4. Shri S.C. Bramhchari Member
5. Dr. D. C. Gupta, Member
6. Smt. Shruti Shukla, Secretary, SEAC &
Director (I/C), Environment, UP
The Chairman welcomed the members to the 240th
SEAC meeting.
The Members of SEAC unanimously taken following decisions on the agenda points
discussed:
1. “Chak Ganjaria Township Master Plan” Sultanpur road, Lucknow, U.P. Rohit Khanna,
Executive Engineer, Project unit, LDA, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow. File N0. 2097/JDCA-S
Principal Secretary, Environment, Govt. of U.P. through letter no. 1483/PS/PSF/2015 dated
01/09/2015 directed Director, Environment/Member Secretary, UPPCB for consideration of
application of Executive Engineer, LDA regarding Environmental Clearance of Chak Ganjaria
Zonal Development Plan on priority. Copy of letter dated 06/05/2015 of Executive Engineer, LDA
was attached with the letter dated 01/09/2015.
Executive Engineer, LDA through his letter dated 06/05/2015 has informed that
environmental clearance was granted for Chak Ganjaria Zonal Development Plan through SEIAA
letter dated 27/05/2014. Recently it has been finalized to exclude khasra no. 279 kha, (area 37.72
acres) from Chak Ganjaria Zonal Development Plan as per minutes of meeting held on dated
26/03/2015 under the Chairmanship of Principal Secretary, Awas evam Shahri Niyojan, Govt. of
U.P. vide GO no. 1126/AATH-1-15-24writ/2013 dated 31/03/2015 Awas Evam Shahri Niyojan
Anubagh-1. Revised layout plan has been approved by Technical Committee after excluding khasra
no. 279 kha(area 37.72 acres). This has resulted in to the decrease of total township/development
area of Chak Ganjaria Zonal Development Plan from 342.56 ha (846.49 acres) to 326.93 ha (807.86
acres). It is also submitted that there is no alteration in the land use pattern of the project after
exclusion of khasra no. 279 kha (area 37.72 acres). The total landscape area of 20.14% has been
retained.
The committee scheduled the matter in SEAC meeting dated 29/10/2015. A presentation
was made by Shri O.P. Mishra, Chief Engineer, Shri D.C. Srivastava, Executive Engineer along
with their consultant M/s Sawen Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the
documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. Environmental Clearance for Chak Ganjaria Zonal Development Plan was obtained vide
SEIAA letter dated 27/05/2014.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 2 of 24
2. Recently it has been finalized to exclude khasra no. 279 kha, (area 37.72 acres) from Chak
Ganjaria Zonal Development Plan as per minutes of meeting held on dated 26/03/2015
under the Chairmanship of Principal Secretary, Awas evam Shahri Niyojan, Govt. of U.P.
vide GO no. 1126/AATH-1-15-24writ/2013 dated 31/03/2015 Awas Evam Shahri Niyojan
Anubagh-1. Revised layout plan has been approved by Technical Committee after excluding
khasra no. 279 kha(area 37.72 acres). This has resulted in to the decrease of total
township/development area of Chak Ganjaria Zonal Development Plan from 342.56 ha
(846.49 acres) to 326.93 ha (807.86 acres). It is also submitted that there is no alteration in
the land use pattern of the project after exclusion of khasra no. 279 kha (area 37.72 acres).
The total landscape area of 20.14% has been retained.
3. Comparative Area details for Chak Ganjaria Township Zonal Development Plan: CHAK GANJARIA TOWNSHIP ZONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
EC Granted vide Letter No. 381/Parya/SEAC-III/2097/2014/JDCA(S) dated 27.05.2014
After Exclusion of Khasra No. 279 (खखखख) from Chak
Ganjaria Zonal Development Plan
S. N. Land Use Area
(Acre)
Area
(Hectare)
Percentage (%) Land Use Area
(Acre)
Area
(Hectare)
Percentage
(%)
1 Residential Area 132.7 53.70 15.68 Residential
Area
132.62 53.67 16.42
2 Commercial Area
67.99 27.51 8.03 Commercial Area
68.08 27.55 8.43
3 Mixed Use Area 159.75 64.64 18.87 Mixed Use Area
145.68 58.95 18.03
4 IT City Area 100.0 40.46 11.81 IT City Area 100.0 40.46 12.38
5 IIIT Area 50.0 20.234 5.91 IIIT Area 50.0 20.234 6.19
6 Milk Processing Unit Area
25.0 10.11 2.95 Milk Processing
Unit Area
25.0 10.11 3.09
7 Medicity Area 100.0 40.46 11.81 Medicity Area
100.0 40.46 12.38
8 Hospital Area 20.0 8.09 2.36 Hospital Area 20.0 8.09 2.48
9 ATI Area 25.0 10.11 2.95 ATI Area 25.0 10.11 3.09
10 Road Area 67.22 27.20 7.94 Road Area 66.57 26.94 8.24
11 Landscape Area 11.68 + 10.62 (Internal Green as per Bye-Laws
(Min 15%)) = 22.3
Landscape Area
9.27 +10.87 (Internal Green as per Bye-
Laws (Min 15%)) = 20.14
11.1 Greenland-
Khasra No. 279
(ख)
37.72 15.26
4.46 11.68
- - -
11.2 Green Parks 19.86 8.03 2.35 Green Parks 33.41 13.52 4.17
9.27
11.3 Green Connector 41.25 16.69 4.87 Green Connector
41.25 16.69 5.11
Total 846.49 342.56 100.0 807.84 326.92 100.0
CHAK GANJARIA TOWNSHIP ZONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Overall
difference
(Hectare)
EC Granted vide Letter No. 381/Parya/SEAC-
III/2097/2014/JDCA(S) dated 27.05.2014 After Exclusion of Khasra No. 279 (खखखख) from Chak
Ganjaria Zonal Development Plan
Land Use Area (Acre)
Area (Hectare)
Percentage (%)
Land Use Area (Acre)
Area (Hectare)
Percentage (%)
Residential
Area
132.7 53.70 15.68 Residential
Area
132.62 53.67 16.42 -0.03
Commercial
Area
67.99 27.51 8.03 Commercial
Area
68.08 27.55 8.43 +0.04
Mixed Use Area
159.75 64.64 18.87 Mixed Use Area
145.68 58.95 18.03 -5.69
IT City Area 100.0 40.46 11.81 IT City Area 100.0 40.46 12.38 No change
IIIT Area 50.0 20.234 5.91 IIIT Area 50.0 20.234 6.19 No
Change
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 3 of 24
Milk
Processing Unit Area
25.0 10.11 2.95 Milk
Processing Unit Area
25.0 10.11 3.09 No
Change
Medicity
Area
100.0 40.46 11.81 Medicity
Area
100.0 40.46 12.38 No
Change
Hospital Area 20.0 8.09 2.36 Hospital Area 20.0 8.09 2.48 No
Change
ATI Area 25.0 10.11 2.95 ATI Area 25.0 10.11 3.09 No Change
Road Area 67.22 27.20 7.94 Road Area 66.57 26.94 8.24 -0.26
Landscape Area
11.68 + 10.62 (Internal
Green as per Bye-Laws
(Min
15%)) = 22.3
Landscape Area
9.27 +10.87 (Internal
Green as per Bye-Laws
(Min
15%)) =
20.14
Greenland- Khasra No.
279 (ख)
37.72 15.26 4.46
11.68
- - - Excluded
Green Parks 19.86 8.03 2.35 Green Parks 33.41 13.52 4.17
9.27
+5.49
Green
Connector
41.25 16.69 4.87 Green
Connector
41.25 16.69 5.11 No
Change
Total 846.49 342.56 100.0 807.84 326.92 100.0
4. Total landscape area detail in the revised layout plan:
S.
No.
Landscape Area Area (Acre) Area
(Hectare)
Percentage (%)
1 Green Parks 33.41 13.53 4.17
2 Green Connector 41.25 16.69 5.11
3 Central Verge-Tree Plantation Area within 45 m
wide zonal road
3.33 1.35 0.41
4 Central Verge-Tree Plantation Area within 30 m
wide zonal road
1.66 0.67 0.21
5 Road Side Plantation along 45 m wide zonal road 4.47 1.80 0.55
6 Road Side Plantation along 30 m wide zonal road 3.89 1.57 0.48
88.01 35.61 10.93
The committee discussed the matter and observed that total green area shall naturally be
reduced after exclusion of proposed land as per proposal. The SEIAA in its EC dated 27/05/2014
for Chak Ganjaria Zonal Development Plan/Layout plan has stipulated various conditions regarding
provisions of green area. In view of this, the committee deliberated that project proponent should
ensure that conditions stipulated in EC dated 27/05/2014 regarding green area should not be
affected and according plan should be submitted. It should also be specifically mentioned that what
changes/modifications (from the proposal which was submitted earlier for environmental clearance)
are now being proposed. Revised proposal including as above alongwith approved maps for the
revised project should also be submitted.
The committee directed to schedule the matter for its discussion after submission of
information as above.
2. Indian Institute of Information Technology, Chak Ganjaria Development Plan, Gram
Mastemau. Lko, Sri Raghuraj Singh, Director, KNIT, Sultanpur . File N0. 3136/OSD-T
The project proponent did not appear. The Secretariat informed that environmental
clearance for the proposals have already been issued through letter no.
1048/Parya/SEAC/3136 dated 30/09/2015. The matter has been listed as its status was not
updated on the SEIAA database. Since the matter is already disposed, it is proposed to delist
the matter from the agenda. The committee discussed and deliberated to delist the matter
from the agenda of SEAC meeting dated 29/10/2015.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 4 of 24
3. “Installation of Gas Turbine (20 MW) with HRSC at Mathura Refinery of Indian Oil
Corporation Ltd. Sri C. Shankar, General Manager (HSE), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,
Mathura Refinery, Mathura. File N0. 1555/DD-DS/OSD-T
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
23/03/2015 wherein the project proponent was directed as follows:
"The committee discussed the matter and observed that source of data has not been mentioned in
the report which should be submitted by the project proponent. The committee also noted that in EIA report, statements related to data collection have been made in future tense which make no
sense. It should be reviewed and necessary correction with proper justification should be submitted. The committee also directed to submit following information:
1. Data used for report preparation should not be too old. If, data monitoring/collection facility is installed/available at Mathura refinery, why the old data was used for preparation of report.
2. Monitoring data of the concerned stations should be submitted.
3. Hydro Carbon data should also be included into monitoring.
4. Apart from rain water harvesting from roof tops, other rain water may be collected in
pond/water body and may be used for grading or other necessary purposes.
5. Water conversation plan is to be submitted.
6. Under CSR activities, proposal for addition of health facilities should be submitted as
discussed.
7. Necessary permissions from TTZ Authority shall be taken.
8. The statement given on page 52/155 that three months data will be collected shows that data
has not yet collected. It should be explained and sources of monitoring data should also be
mentioned.
9. In page no 41, composition of natural gas to be used for GT-IV has been calculated
incorrectly, which should be explained. 10. Approved Lay out from Peace to be submitted.
11. Refinery data of 2014/2015 is to be submitted. 12. Meteorological data of, 2012/2013 to be produced for Mathura Refinery rather than of
Aligarh. 13. Ambient Air quality on line monitoring to be done in Campus for hydro carbons.
The committee also deliberated that the EIA report was not having the original monitoring
reports supported by the analytic reports duly authenticated by the MOEF approved laboratories.
Besides it also appeared that the consultant organization has actually not carried out any field work
after the issuance of TOR. The consultant is directed to submit the EIA report after modification
and explanation as above."
The project proponent submitted their replies through letter dated 03/08/2015. A
presentation was made by Shri V.K. Shakyavar, Chief Manager (HSE), Mathura Refinary
authorized representative of project proponent along with their consultant M/s Engineers India Ltd.
The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the
committee that:-
1. IOCL envisages to install a Gas Turbine Generator of 20 MW with associated Heat
Recovery Steam Generator of 103 T/hr. TOR issued by State Expert Appraisal Committee
(SEAC), meeting held on 18th
June 2013. Public hearing was conducted by Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) on 5
th Sept’ 2014 at Refinery Township, Mathura for the
proposed project. During presentation in 210th
Meeting of SEAC on 23rd
March 2015, SEAC desired additional information (13 nos) from IOCL based on which an additional
report was prepared and changes were also incorporated in EIA report. All documents were
submitted to SEAC on 5th August 2015.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 5 of 24
2. Presently Mathura Refinery Thermal Power Station (TPS) consist of three Gas turbines of
20 MW capacity, three Steam turbo generators of 12.5 MW capacities and three Boilers of
150 TPH capacity. Refinery requires operating three Gas Turbines, 2 STGs and two boilers
for meeting the power and the steam requirement of the refinery complex. However,
operation of existing facilities does not meet the spinning reserve for power requirement of
the refinery complex (for reliability of the plant) and thus new Gas turbine is proposed to be
installed. The new Gas Turbine in Thermal Power Station (TPS) is being installed
considering that the source of power generation is not meeting the spinning reserve requirement. The installation of new GT will lead to reliable operation of the refinery. After
installation of new Gas turbine, four Gas turbines and 1 STG will be operated for meeting the power requirement, 4 Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSGs) and one boiler for
meeting the steam requirement. Thus with the new Gas Turbine-IV project at Mathura Refinery, there will be load shifting from steam turbo generators and existing boiler to new
gas turbine and HRSG. In addition, since gas turbine along with HRSG is total combined cycle mode of operation which is more efficient in comparison to the boilers and steam
turbo generator machines which operate in partial combined cycle and hence this will lead to marginal reduction of emission from the refinery.
3. Monitoring data of the related stations for the project has been submitted as follows: Pollutant Parameters Data submitted
Stack Emission SO2, NOx, PM, CO, etc Jan’14 – Mar’15
Ambient Air inside Refinery 12 Parameters Jan’14 – Mar’15
Ambient Air outside
Refinery
SO2,NOx, CO, NH
3, PM
2.5 & PM
10 Apr’14 – Mar’15
Effluent Leaving Refinery All Parameters Jan’14 – May’15
4. Regarding hydrocarbon data, One season baseline data collected during November 2012 to
January 2013 also include hydro carbon data (both methane & non-methane hydrocarbons). Methane Hydrocarbons concentration was not detected except Dhanateja village for 8
samples. Methane Hydrocarbons concentration at Dhanateja were ranging from 0.09 to 0.14
ppm. Non methane hydrocarbons concentration was observed at Dhanateja, Bad, Bhainsa,
S.J Hospital, Fareh, and Naglagayasi. At other 9 locations, Non-methane hydrocarbon were
found to below detectable limits. Non methane hydrocarbons concentrations values were
ranging from 0.03 to 0.56 ppm.
5. Regarding rain water harvesting, it is submitted that in township, rain water from ground
area as well as from roof top is collected and recharged. For financial year 2015-16, the
rainwater harvesting scheme is planned at Swarna Jayanti Hospital. Total catchment area is
3800 m2. Total recharge quantity expected is 2237 KL considering 866 mm annual rainfall
as per last year IMD data of rainfall in Mathura region. Expenditure is about Rs. 8.78 lacs.
Expected commissioning of the rainwater harvesting structure is February 2016.
6. Regarding water conservation plan it is submitted that Mathura Refinery constantly making
efforts for reducing fresh water consumption and increasing reuse schemes. Major schemes
implemented :
• Modernization of Effluent Treatment Plant: Started to reuse treated effluent in tune of
150 m3/hr as cooling tower make-up.
• RO plant based on ETP treated water: Increased reuse of treated effluent to 250-300
m3/hr
• Bridle Water Schemes: Cooling water supplied to all pumps for seal and packing coolers
is returned to cooling water return header.
• Recovery of uncontaminated process water & recycle: Streams tapped are condensate,
AC Plant cooling water, blow downs etc.
• Treated water as Fire Water Make-up: The treated effluent is reused as make-up to fire-water network entirely.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 6 of 24
7. Regarding CSR activities it is submitted that, Township Hospital has initiated to send
mobile dispensaries for routine check-up of the villagers of surrounding locality. Under this
CSR program, 11 nos. of surrounding villages such as Koyala Ali-pur, Baad, Bhainsa,
Barari, Chargoan, Raval etc. is being covered. Each mobile dispensary is equipped with the
facilities for preliminary medical care and accompanied by MBBS doctor, nurse and health
educator. The mobile dispensaries visit 8 times per village per month. Around 2000 patients
are being given the treatment for various ailments monthly.The medicines - capsule, syrup,
tablets, ointment, eye drops etc. for different diseases are being provided free of cost. A separate expenditure of Rs. 3.52 lacs per month is being incurred for the same.
8. The corrected composition of natural gas is provided below: Composition Mole Percentage
C6+ compounds 0.0047
PROPANE 0.7820
i-BUTANE 0.0250
n-BUTANE 0.0210
i-PENTANE 0.0035
n-PENTANE 0.0038
NITROGEN 0.1200
METHANE 90.0000
CARBON DIOXIDE 4.2400
ETHANE 4.8000
TOTAL 100.0000
The committee discussed the matter and recommended grant of environmental clearance on
the project proposals alongwith following specific and general conditions:
A. Specific Conditions:
1. The gaseous emissions from proposed Gas Turbine along with HRSG shall be
dispersed through stack of adequate height as per CPCB/UPPCB guidelines. The stack emissions from various units shall conform to the standards prescribed under the
Environment (Protection) Act. At no time, the emission levels shall go beyond the stipulated standards. In the event of failure of pollution control system(s) adopted by the
unit, the unit shall be immediately put out of operation and shall not be restarted until the desired efficiency of the pollution control device has been achieved.
2. The proposed unit shall only be installed as stand-by purpose for overcoming the shortage in spinning reserve. Therefore, no additional water shall be required as committed by project
proponent.
3. No additional industrial effluent generation should be made.
4. Automatic /online monitoring system (24x7 monitoring devices) for flow measurement
and relevant pollutants in the treatment system to be installed. The data to be made available
to the respective SPCB and in the Company's website.
5. All the recommendations mentioned in the risk assessment report, disaster management plan
and safety guidelines shall be implemented.
6. Necessary permission from TTZ Authority and PESO shall be obtained as per law.
7. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan along with budgetary provision amounting to
2% of project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors of the company. A
copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the authority alongwith list of beneficiaries
with their mobile nos./address.
8. Layout should be get approved from PESO prior to start of operation.
B. General Conditions:
1. The project authorities must strictly adhere to the stipulations made by the State Pollution
Control Board (SPCB), State Government and any other statutory authority. 2. No further expansion or modification in the project shall be carried out without prior
approval of the Ministry of Environment & Forests. In case of deviations or alterations in the project proposal from those submitted to this Ministry for clearance, a fresh reference
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 7 of 24
shall be made to the Ministry to assess the adequacy of conditions imposed and to add
additional environmental protection measures required, if any.
3. The project authorities must strictly comply with the rules and regulations under
Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 2000 as amended
subsequently. Prior approvals from Chief Inspectorate of Factories, Chief Controller of
Explosives, Fire Safety Inspectorate etc. must be obtained, wherever applicable.
4. The overall noise levels in and around the plant area shall be kept well within the standards
by providing noise control measures including acoustic hoods, silencers, enclosures etc. on all sources of noise generation. The ambient noise levels shall conform to the standards
prescribed under EPA Rules, 1989 viz. 75 dBA (daytime) and 70 dBA (nighttime). 5. A separate Environmental Management Cell equipped with full fledged laboratory facilities
must be set up to carry out the environmental management and monitoring functions. 6. Adequate funds shall be earmarked towards capital cost and recurring cost/annum for
environment pollution control measures and shall be used to implement the conditions stipulated by the Ministry of Environment and Forests as well as the State Government
alongwith the implementation schedule for all the conditions stipulated herein. The funds so provided shall not be diverted for any other purposes.
7. The Regional Office of this Ministry/Central Pollution Control Board/State Pollution
Control Board will monitor the stipulated conditions. A six monthly compliance report and
the monitored data along with statistical interpretation shall be submitted to them regularly
and to SEIAA also.
8. The project proponent shall upload the status of compliance of the stipulated environment
clearance conditions, including results of monitored data on their website and shall update
the same periodically. It shall simultaneously be sent to the Regional Office of the MOEF,
the respective Zonal Office of CPCB and the SPCB. The criteria pollutant levels namely;
PM10 , PM2 s, S02 , NOx, HC (Methane & Non-methane), VOCs (ambient levels as well as
stack emissions) or critical sectoral parameters, indicated for the projects shall be
monitored and displayed at a convenient location near the main gate of the company in the public domain.
9. The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of the compliance of the stipulated environmental conditions including results of monitored data (both in hard
copies as well as by e-mail) to the Regional Office of MOEF, the respective Zonal Office of CPCB and the SPCB. The Regional Office of MoEF, CPCB, SPCB shall monitor the
stipulated conditions. 10. The environmental statement for each financial year ending 31st March in Form-V as is
mandated to be submitted by the project proponent to the concerned State Pollution Control Board as prescribed under the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, as amended
subsequently, shall also be put on the website of the company alongwith the status of
compliance of environmental conditions and shall also be sent to the respective Regional
Offices of the MOEF by e-mail.
11. The Project Proponent shall inform the public that the project has been accorded
environmental clearance by the Ministry and copies of the clearance letter are available with
the SPCB and may also be seen at Website of the Ministry of Environment and Forests at
http:/envfor.nic.in. This shall be advertised within seven days from the date of issue of the
clearance letter, at least in two local newspapers that are widely circulated in the region of
which one shall be in the vernacular language of the locality concerned and a copy of the
same shall be forwarded to the Regional office.
12. Project authorities shall inform the Regional Office as well as the Ministry, the date of financial closure and final approval of the project by the concerned authorities and the date
of commencing the land development work.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 8 of 24
4. Medical University at Greater Noida, U.P. Smt. Leenu Sahgal, G M (Planning), 169,
Chitvan Estate, Sector-Gamma, Greater Noida. File N0. 2406/AD-Sub
The project proponent did not appear. The committee noted that the project was
earlier scheduled in SEAC meeting dated 21/10/2014 wherein the project proponent was
directed to communicate project reports to all committee members. Now again, on
scheduling the matter on 29/10/2015, the project proponent has not appeared. The
committee directed to close the matter. The project proponent should apply afresh for
further consideration of the matter. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
5. Solid Waste Management, Bhadohi Cluster (Pipris) Project at ARaji No-11139, 1257,
1258, 1283, 1284, 1289, 1290-1297 & 1299, Vill-Piprish, Bhadohi (Area-7.603 Hac)- Sri
Brij Mohan Varma, Project Manager, Unit-38, C & DS, UP Jal Nigam, Raj Vill,
Chandi Tiraha, Robertsganj, Sonbhadra. File N0. 2897/AD-Sub.
The project proponent did not appear. The committee noted that the matter was
earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 23/07/2015 wherein the project proponent did not
appear. Now again, on scheduling the matter on 29/10/2015, the project proponent has not
appeared. The committee directed to close the matter till a request is received from the
project proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
6. Sand/Morum Mining at araji No-196K, Vill-Sadimurkaul, Chakiya, Chandauli (Area-
5.00 Acres) Sri Chandrashekhar, Vill-Singhraul, Post-Bhatraul, Chakiya, Chandauli.
File N0. 2684/SPO-V
The committee noted that an undated application received on 05/12/2014 was made by the
project proponent for environmental clearance of Sand/Morum Mining at araji No-196K, Vill-
Sadimurkaul, Chakiya, Chandauli (Area-5.00 Acres).
A presentation was made by Shri Chandrashekhar, project proponent along with their
consultant M/s Paramarsh, Lucknow. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the
presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Sand/Morum Mining at araji No-196K, Vill-
Sadimurkaul, Chakiya, Chandauli (Area-5.00 Acres).
2. As per form-1 and presentation made, collection of 63765 cum/annum Sand is proposed
from lease area 5.0 acres from mining lease area.
3. Mining Lease area was granted to the applicant Sri Chandrashekhar for a period of 3 years
from 20/12/2011 to 19/12/2014 vide letter dated 15/11/2011. DM, Chandauli stopped
mining activity at the site through his order dated 27/08/2013 and directed to submit
environmental clearance from MoEF/SEIAA. Hence, Environmental clearance is sought for
the lapse period of 01 year 03 months 22 days.
4. During operation the maximum no. of workers will not be more then 25.
5. The mining plan has been prepared by Shri Pankaj Pandey (RQP No.-RQP/BNG/086/95A).
6. Mining will be opencast type and will be carried out manually.
7. The water requirement will be limited to 1.75 KLD. Water requirement shall be met through
nearby existing dugwells/borewells supplied from the nearby villages by tankers.
8. The ultimate depth of mining will be restricted to 3 meter/water table, whichever is less.
9. The mining would be restricted to unsaturated zone only above the phreatic water table and
will not intersect the ground water table at any point of time.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 9 of 24
10. The mining operation will not be carried out in safety zone of any bridge or embankment or
in eco-fragile zone such as habitat of any wild fauna.
11. No earth is to be excavated only sand shall be removed.
12. There is no litigation pending in any court regarding the project.
13. District Magistrate Office, Chandauli it has been informed that there is no existing operating
mine within 500 m from the periphery of the proposed site.
14. This project does not attract any of the general conditions applicable on mining projects
specified in EIA Notification 14/09/2006.
15. The project proposal fall under category 1(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as amended).
The committee discussed the matter and observed that approved mining plan has not yet been submitted. Also, any letter of intent regarding claim of restricted period (ckf/kr vof/k) has also
not been submitted. Cluster information submitted vide letter dated 29/09/2015 of Mining
Inspector, Chandauli does not mention about approved lease areas within 500 m it should also be
ensured that the letter issued from Mining Department should have a dispatch number. The
committee also directed the proponent to check reserve quantity and mineable quantity of the
mineral as mentioned in documents submitted by the project proponent. The committee directed to submit above information for further consideration of the matter.
7. Sand/Morum Mining Project at araji No-1 & 2, Vill-Kavadsar, Chandauli (Area-9.00
Acres) Sri Rama Mallaha, Vill-Parasikalan, Tehsil & Chandauli. File N0. 2685/OSD-T
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project file should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
8. Sand/Morum Mining at araji No-243 & 244, Vill-Naudiha, Chakiya, Chandauli (Area-
4.00 Acres) Smt Prabhavati Devi, Vill-Saray Balua, Tehsil-Sakalahih, Chandauli. File
N0. 2686/DD-Y
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project file should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
9. “Sand Mining” Project at Arazi No-332, Vill-Redia, Tehsil-Robertsganj, Sonbhadra
(Area-0.29 Ha) Sri Ram Singh, Vill-Kuruhul, Tehsil-Robertsganj, Distt-Sonbhadra.
File N0. 2698/DD-Y
The committee noted that an application dated 15/12/2014 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of “Sand Mining” Project at Arazi No-332, Vill-Redia,
Tehsil-Robertsganj, Sonbhadra (Area-0.29 Ha).
A presentation was made by Shri Vinod Maurya, authorized representative of project
proponent along with their consultant M/s Shree Environment Technology Institute, New Delhi.
The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the
committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for “Sand Mining” Project at Arazi No-332, Vill-
Redia, Tehsil-Robertsganj, Sonbhadra (Area-0.29 Ha).
2. As per form-1 70,000 cum sand mining is proposed whereas in presentation made,
collection of 8700 cum/annum sand is proposed from lease area 0.29 Ha over the period of
90 days.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 10 of 24
3. During operation the maximum no. of workers will not be more then 40.
4. Mining will be opencast type and will be carried out manually.
5. The water requirement will be limited to 2.0 KLD. Water requirement shall be met through
nearby existing dugwells/borewells supplied from the nearby villages by tankers.
6. The ultimate depth of mining will be restricted to 3 meter/water table, whichever is less.
7. The mining would be restricted to unsaturated zone only above the phreatic water table and
will not intersect the ground water table at any point of time.
8. The mining operation will not be carried out in safety zone of any bridge or embankment or
in eco-fragile zone such as habitat of any wild fauna.
9. No earth is to be excavated only sand shall be removed.
10. There is no litigation pending in any court regarding the project.
11. District Magistrate Office, Sonebhadra through its letter dated 25/11/2014 has directed to
obtain environmental clearance and submit for further necessary action.
12. This project does not attract any of the general conditions applicable on mining projects
specified in EIA Notification 14/09/2006.
13. The project proposal fall under category 1(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as amended).
The committee discussed the matter and directed to submit following information:
1. Approved mining plan/communication with mining department in this regard.
2. Certificate from District Mining Officer regarding other approved/operational mines
within 500 m of the project site.
3. Land records.
4. Transport route for carrying the excavated sand.
5. CSR Plan.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
10. Sand Mining Project at Survey No-546, Vill-Mahui, Tehsil & Distt-Deoria (Area-5.00
Acre)- Sri Ram Dev Sahani, , Vill-Mahui, Tehsil & Distt-Deoria. File N0. 2704/SPO-V
The project proponent did not appear neither they send any application regarding
their absence. The committee discussed and deliberated that project file should be closed
and should be opened only after request from the project proponent. The file shall not be
treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
11. Soil Mining at Khasra No-36, Vill-Sikandarpur, Tehsil-Garhmukteshwar, District-
Hapur, U.P. (Leased Area-1.579 Ha) Sri Abdul Kadir, Mohammadabad, Tehsil-
Hasanpur, Ditt- Jyotiba Phule Nagar. File N0. 2958/AD-Sub.
The committee noted that an application dated 01/04/2015 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Soil Mining at Khasra No-36, Vill-Sikandarpur, Tehsil-
Garhmukteshwar, District-Hapur, U.P. (Leased Area-1.579 Ha).
A presentation was made by Shri Ravendra, authorized representative of project proponent
along with their consultant M/s Ind Tech House Consult, Delhi. The proponent, through the
documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Soil Mining at Khasra No-36, Vill-Sikandarpur,
Tehsil-Garhmukteshwar, District-Hapur, U.P. (Leased Area-1.579 Ha).
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 11 of 24
2. As per Form-1 and presentation; 3,000 cum of soil excavation is proposed over the period of
90 days.
3. The ultimate depth of mining will be restricted to 03 meter.
4. The water requirement will be limited to 2.8 KLD & will be supplied from water tankers.
5. During operation the maximum no. of workers will 04.
6. The mining will be opencast type and carried out mechanised.
7. This project does not attract any of the general conditions applicable on mining projects
specified in EIA Notification 14/09/2006.
8. The project proposal falls under category 1(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as amended).
9. Regarding the project no litigation is pending in any court.
The committee discussed the matter and directed to submit following information:
1. Compliance of MoEF OM dated 24/06/2013 regarding soil excavation in affidavit form.
2. Certificate from District Mining Officer regarding other approved/operational mining
area within 500 m of the project site. 3. Actual volume of excavated soil proposed after taking the losses resulting from leaving
the berm around the excavation site into account and including safety features. 4. A chart showing details of volume of earth excavation Gata-wise alongwith owner and
area of each corresponding Gata and excavation period as per agreement with owner of the site/proposed depth of excavation from each Gata. Total volume of earth excavation
proposed over the agreement period should also be provided. 5. Land records.
6. Disposal plan and transport route for carrying the excavated soil.
7. Permission/consent should be obtained from the owner of the site where disposal of soil
is proposed.
8. Plan for making 700 m kuccha road motorable.
9. CSR Plan.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
12. “Soil Excavation” at Gata No-1290, 880, 1866 & 1303, Vill-Malaha, Tehsil-Malihabad,
Distt-Lucknow (Area-1.7960 Hac) Sri Virendra Mishra, 1/780, Vikas Nagar, Lucknow.
File N0. 2980/ DD-Sh.
The project proponent did not appear neither they send any application regarding
their absence. The committee discussed and deliberated that project file should be closed
and should be opened only after request from the project proponent. The file shall not be
treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
13. “Soil Excavation” at Gata No-405, Vill-Banshigarhi, Tehsil-Sadar, Distt-Lucknow
(Area 1.0500 Hac)- Sri Ramanand, SS-576, Sector-G, LDA Colony, Kanpur Rd,
Lucknow. File N0. 2991/ DD-Y
The committee noted that an application dated 15/04/2015 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of “Soil Excavation” at Gata No-405, Vill-Banshigarhi,
Tehsil-Sadar, Distt-Lucknow (Leased Area 1.0500 Ha).
A presentation was made by Shri Ramanand, M/s Atal Gopal Builders, project proponent
along with their consultant M/s Global Environment & Mining Services. The proponent, through
the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 12 of 24
1. The environmental clearance is sought for “Soil Excavation” at Gata No-405, Vill-Banshigarhi,
Tehsil-Sadar, Distt-Lucknow (Leased Area 1.0500 Ha).
2. As per Form-1 and presentation; 8977 cum of soil excavation is proposed over the period of 90
days.
3. The ultimate depth of mining will be restricted to 0.95 meter.
4. The water requirement will be limited to 1.5 KLD & will be supplied from water tankers.
5. During operation the maximum no. of workers will 15.
6. District Magistrate Office, Lucknow through letter dated 19/10/2015 it has been informed that
there is no existing operating mine within 500 m from the periphery of the proposed site.
7. The mining will be opencast type and carried out mechanised.
8. This project does not attract any of the general conditions applicable on mining projects
specified in EIA Notification 14/09/2006.
9. The project proposal falls under category 1(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as amended).
10. Regarding the project no litigation is pending in any court.
The committee observed that excavation quantity from the proposed site can be 9975 cum
whereas 10,000 cum is proposed in form-1. The committee in view of area of land (1.05 ha) can
only permit excavation of 9000 cum earth from the proposed site with general and specific
conditions as annexed as annexure-1 & 2 to these minutes. Following condition should also be
stipulated:
1. Total project cost is Rs. 5.00 Lacs. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan along with
budgetary provision amounting to minimum Rs. 25,000 shall be prepared and approved by
owner/Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted
to the authority alongwith list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address.
14. Soil Mining Project at Vill-Seorampur, Tehsil-Siana, Distt-Bulandshahar (Area-4.558
Ha)- Sri Mahendra Singh, H.No-86, Vill-Seorampur, Distt-Bulandshahar. 3012/AD-H
The committee noted that an application dated 21/04/2015 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Soil Mining Project at Vill-Seorampur, Tehsil-Siana,
Distt-Bulandshahar, U.P. (Leased Area-4.558 Ha).
A presentation was made by Shri Mahendra Singh, Applicant along with their consultant
M/s Ascenso Enviro Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the
presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Soil Mining Project at khata no. 16/khasra ano. 126
and khata no. 157/khasra no. 238, Vill-Seorampur, Tehsil-Siana, Distt-Bulandshahar, U.P.
(Total Leased Area-4.558 Ha).
2. As per Form-1 and presentation soil excavation is proposed as per following production chart: Owner
Name
Khata
No.
Gata
No.
Total
Area (Ha)
Area
involved in berm
Area left
after berm
Excavation
period
Maximum
Depth
Maximum
Volume cum
Proposed
Extractable Volume of brick clay (after
leaving berm) in five years
Cum Tonnes
Mr. Veer Singh
157 238 1.786 0.036 1.75 5 years 1.2 21432 21,000 27,300
Mr.
Surajpal Singh
16 126 2.772 0.282 2.49 5 years 1.2 33264 29880 38844
4.558 0.318 4.24 54696 50880 66144
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 13 of 24
3. Production details after leaving berm area & other safety measures (including loss in handling):
Khata
No./Gata
No.
Area
(Ha)
Area
involved in
berm
Area
left
after
berm
Excavation
period
Maximum
Depth
Maximum
Volume
cum
Proposed Extractable
Volume of Soil (after
leaving berm area &
including other safety
measures
Cu. m Tonnes
157/238,
16/126
4.558 0.318 4.24 5 years 1.2 54696 50045 65059
4. The water requirement will be limited to 1.275 KLD & will be supplied from water tankers.
5. During operation the maximum no. of workers will 25.
6. Project proponent through reference dated 12/03/2015 of Tehsildaar, Siana informed that there
is no mining work being undertaken within 500 m of the proposed site.
7. An affidavit dated 29/10/2015 has been submitted by the proponent regarding compliance of
provisions given in MoEF OM dated 24/06/2013.
8. The mining will be opencast type and carried out mechanised.
9. This project does not attract any of the general conditions applicable on mining projects
specified in EIA Notification 14/09/2006.
10. The project proposal falls under category 1(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as amended).
11. Regarding the project no litigation is pending in any court
The committee discussed the matter and recommended grant of environmental clearance for
the project proposals alongwith general and specific conditions annexed at annexure-1 & 2 to these
minutes. This environmental clearance is subject to verification of information, regarding other
mining sites within 500 m of proposed project site(s) as submitted by the project proponent through
reference dated 12/03/2015 of Tehsildaar, Siana by District Administration/Mining Department.
Following condition should also be stipulated:
1. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan along with budgetary provision amounting to
minimum Rs. 75,000 shall be prepared and approved by owner/Board of Directors of the
company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the authority alongwith list of
beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address.
15. “Soil Excavation” at Gata No-592, Vill-Mehora, Tehsil-Sadar, District-Lucknow
(Area-1.265 Hac) Sri Natha, Vill-Dhanai Ke Purwa, Lucknow. Sri Natha, Vill-Dhanai
Ke Purwa, Lucknow. File N0. 3074/AD-H
The committee noted that an application dated 11/05/2015 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of “Soil Excavation” at Gata No-592, Vill-Mehora, Tehsil-
Sadar, District-Lucknow (Area-1.265 Hac).
A presentation was made by Shri Arjun Singh, authorized representative of project
proponent along with their consultant M/s Global Environment & Mining Services. The proponent,
through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for “Soil Excavation” at Gata No-592, Vill-Mehora,
Tehsil-Sadar, District-Lucknow (Area-1.265 Hac).
2. As per Form-1 and presentation; 10,000 cum of soil excavation is proposed.
3. The ultimate depth of mining will be restricted to 0.80 meter.
4. The water requirement will be limited to 1.5 KLD & will be supplied from water tankers.
5. During operation the maximum no. of workers will 10.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 14 of 24
6. District Magistrate Office, Lucknow through letter dated 30/04/2015 it has been informed that
there is no existing operating mine within 500 m from the periphery of the proposed site.
7. The mining will be opencast type and carried out mechanised.
8. This project does not attract any of the general conditions applicable on mining projects
specified in EIA Notification 14/09/2006.
9. The project proposal falls under category 1(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as amended).
10. Regarding the project no litigation is pending in any court.
The committee discussed the matter and recommended grant of environmental clearance for
the project proposals alongwith general and specific conditions annexed at annexure-1 & 2 to these minutes. The committee also stipulated that no digging shall be undertaken. This clearance is only
for levelling of undulated part of the proposed plot. Transportation of excavated earth should be
undertaken in covered trucks/trolleys.
This environmental clearance is subject to verification of information, regarding other
mining sites within 500 m of proposed project site(s) as submitted by the project proponent through
reference dated 30/04/2015 of District Magistrate Office, Lucknow by District Administration/
Mining Department.
16. IT/ITES Park at Plot No-12A, Sector-Knowledge Part-III, Greater Noida. Sri Ujjwal
Kalra, 211,2nd Floor, C-58, Comm. CPTS Tower, Janakpur, New Delhi. File N0.
2726/OSD-T
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project file should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
17. Group Housing at Plot No-GH-16D, Sector-a, Greater Noida. Sri Atul K Gupta, B-16,
Sector-67 Noida. File N0. 2727/DD-Y
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project file should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
18. Group Housing “ETA Residency” at Plot No-GH-01, Sector-Eta a, Greater Noida. Si
Ujjwal Kalra, B-11, Comm. Centre, SPTS Tower, Janakpur, New Delhi. File N0.
2728/AD -H
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project file should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
19. “Rudra Vrindavan” Group at Housing Project Plot No-14/GH-01, Sector-14,
Vrindavan Yojna-4, Lucknow- Sri S.K. Pandey, Chief Adviser, 1st Floor, Satya
Business Park-1, Nawal Kishore Road, Hazaratganj, Lucknow. File N0. 2750/OSD-T
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project file should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 15 of 24
20. Multi Storied Building & Plotted Development Project at R-51, HRA-13, Surajpur
Site-C, Housing Sector Phase-2, G.B. Nagar, U.P., Col. P.K. Singhal, V.P.(Services), 15,
UGF, Indra Prakash, 21, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. File N0. 2754/OSD-T
The committee noted that an application dated 28/10/2014 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Multi Storied Building & Plotted Development Project at
R-51, HRA-13, Surajpur Site-C, Housing Sector Phase-2, G.B. Nagar, U.P. M/s Ansal Housing and
Construction Ltd.
A presentation was made by Shri P.K. Singhal, project proponent along with their consultant
M/s EQMS India Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation
made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Multi Storied Building & Plotted Development
Project at R-51, HRA-13, Surajpur, Site-C, Housing Sector Phase-2, G.B. Nagar, U.P. M/s
Ansal Housing and Construction Ltd.
2. Salient features details of the Project:
S.
No.
Description Proposed
1. Geographical coordinates of the Project Site
28°30'24.12" N & 77°31'6.78" E
2. Plot Area 56119.76 m
2
3. Estimated Population 6827
4. Built-up Area
138600.409 m2
5. Solid Waste Generated 2670 kg/day
6. Electricity load Multi-storied building: 3248 KW (3609 kVA)
Plotted development: 367 KW (408 kVA) 7. No. of RWH pits 8 Pits 8. Total Water Requirement 513 KLD
9. Fresh Water Requirement 284 KLD
10. Source of water Municipal Supply
3. Area details of the project:
S. N. Description Area (sq m)
1. Plot area 56119.76
2. Area under group housing (GH) 21209.08
3. Area under plotted development 34910.68
4. Permissible Ground Coverage (GC)
• Multi-storied building
• Plotted development
22100.879
7423.178
14677.701
5. Proposed GC
• Multi-storied building
• Plotted development
18602.162
3924.461
14677.701
6. Perm. FAR
• Multi-storied building
• Plotted development
122053.36
74231.78
47821.58
7. Proposed FAR
• Multi-storied building
• Plotted development
99388.087
73954.807 25433.28
8. Perm. Auxiliary FAR for multi-storied building 10688.239
9. Proposed Aux. FAR for multi-storied building 8854.026
10. Service area in towers of multi-storied building 10232.925
11. Services on ground 273.65
12. Stilt Area (Tower Area of multi-storied building) 2449.429
13. Basement Area for multi storied building 17402.292
14. Built-up Area (7+9+10+11+12+13) 138600.409
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 16 of 24
15. Open Area 37517.598
16. Green Area (@50% of open area) 18758.799
17. Area under Surface Parking-multi storied building 4250.000
18. Maximum Height of Building 90.4 m
4. Dwelling units details:
S. No. Tower Type Nos. Of Floor Type & Nos. per floor Total
Unit/Floor
Total Dwelling Unit
in each Tower
1. Tower - A S+25 2B2T-Type1- 6 Nos.
2B2T-Type 2- 2 Nos.
8 200
2. Tower - B S+25 2B2T-Type1- 4 Nos.
2B2T-Type 2- 2 Nos.
6 150
3. Tower - C S+25 3B3T-Type1- 2 Nos.
3B3T-Type 2- 2 Nos.
3B3T-Type 3- 2 Nos.
6 150
4. Tower - D S+25 3B3T-Type1- 2 Nos.
3B3T-Type 2- 2 Nos.
3B3T-Type 3- 2 Nos.
6 150
5. Tower - E S+25 3B3T-Type 2- 2 Nos.
3B3T-Type 3- 2 Nos.
4 100
6. Tower - F S+25 3B3T-Type 2- 2 Nos.
3B3T-Type 3- 2 Nos.
4 100
Total Dwelling Units 850
Residential Plots 50
Total Residential Units 900
2B2T- 2 bedroom 2 toilets
3B3T- 3 bedroom 3 toilets
5. Population details:
S. No. Type No. of Units
(Nos.)/Area (sq m)
Person Per Unit (Nos.) Population (Nos.)
1. Residential
• Residents
• Visitors
900 Nos. 5 4725
4500
225
2. Commercial Area
• Staff
• Visitors
20416.94 sq m 1 person/10 sq m 2042
642
1400
3. Staff in Convenient Shopping -- -- 50
4. Staff in Community Building -- -- 10
Total Population of Project Site 6827
6. Water calculation details:
Category Occupancy
(Nos.)/ Area
Water
Req./capita
(liters)
Water
Req.
(KLD)
Fresh Water
(KLD)
Recycled
Water
(KLD)
Residents 4500 86 387 271 116
Staff 702 30 21 6 15
Visitors 1625 15 24 7 17
Domestic Water Requirement 432 284 148
Landscape 18758.8 sq m 3 l/sq m 56 0 56
DG Cooling (operational for 8
hours)
3500 kVA 0.9 l/kVA/hr 25 0 25
Total Water Requirement 513 284 229
• Source: UPSIDC
• Treatment: STP 450 KLD (FAB)
7. Waste water calculation details:
Category Quantity (KLD)
Sewage Generated (80% fresh water for domestic use +100% flushing water) 376
Capacity of STP 450 (in modules as per
occupancy)
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 17 of 24
Recovered Water from STP (80% of Waste Water)
• Flushing
• Landscaping
• DG Cooling
• Artificial Water Body (Fountain)
• Road & Car Washing
• Excess water to be used for construction purpose/irrigation in
near-by areas/fire-fighting purpose/GNIDA or UPSIDC Green belt
development/disposed through UPSIDC Sewer Line
300
148
56
25
20
20
31
8. Solid waste generation details:
S.
No.
Category Capacity (Nos.)/Area Waste Generation
(Kg/day/capita)
Waste generated
(kg/day)
Residential
1. Residents 4500 0.5 kg/person 2250.0
2. Staff 702 0.25 kg/person 175.4
3. Visitors 1625 0.15 kg/person 243.7
4. Landscape Waste 4.6 acres 0.2 kg/acres 0.9
Total waste Generated 2670
9. Parking details of the project:
Parking Total Area Parking Area
(sq m)
Parking Area per
ECS
Total parking Provided
(ECS)
Basement 17402.292 8730 30 291
Basement-mechanical 7112 -- 396
Stilt 2449.429 2100 30 70
Open 3400 3400 20 170
Total Parking Proposed 927
10. Power & backup power requirement of the project is as follows:
• Power requirement for the multi-storied building is estimated to be 3248 KW (3609
KVA) & for plotted development is 367 KW (408 KVA) as per U.P. Electricity
Regulation Commission norms. 2 Nos. of transformer of capacity 2500 KVA each
will be provided. Source of power will be Noida Power Company Ltd.
• Five Nos. DG sets of total capacity 3500 KVA (4 x 750 KVA & 1 x 500 KVA) will
be provided at the project site for power back up. Out of this DG set of 500 KVA is
kept as stand-by.
11. The project proposals are covered under category 8 "a" of EIA Notification, 2006.
The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit following
information:
1. Documents showing the project site is as per UPSIDC zoning regulation. Allotment
letter from UPSIDC.
2. Affidavit regarding distance of project from Surajpur Wetland.
3. Affidavit that construction has not been started.
4. Structural design certificate signed by architect and vetting authority should be
submitted. All structural design drawings should be signed by architect and counter
signed by vetting authority. Provision of alarm system, to timely notify the
employees/residents, in case of occurrence of earthquake/other natural disasters/fire
should be provided.
5. Area statement with tower wise and floor wise details alongwith no. of units.
6. Plan for 03 m peripheral green around the project within the premises.
7. Development authority bye-laws regarding exemption from 10% EWS/LIG
provisions as proposed by project proponent.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 18 of 24
8. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking,
roads, other services, facilities of the project also in percentage.
9. Required no of trees should be proposed @ 01 tree/80 sqm, submit plan.
10. Check the distance between two road junctions as per building bye-laws and submit.
11. Section of all internal roads should be provided. Right of way and carriage way
width should be clearly marked on the map.
12. Check the population calculation of plotted development as per building bye-laws.
13. Provisions of a pucca underground tank for rain water collection should be undertaken and should be shown on layout plan.
14. Water balance with incorporation of STP (300 KLD). 15. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road side, stair cases, common places.
16. Community facilities as per projected population should be planed and submitted. 17. Total project cost is Rs. 226.58 crores. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan
along with budgetary provision amounting to 2% of project cost (4.52 crores as committed by the project proponent in the meeting) shall be prepared and approved
by Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the authority alongwith list of beneficiaries with their mobile
nos./address.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
21. M/s Omega International, Unit-4, Plot No-B-11/c & B-11/D, UPSIDC Industrial Area,
Site-II, Unnao – Sri Asfand Akhtar, M/s Omega International, Unit-4, Plot No-B-11/c
& B-11/D, UPSIDC Industrial Area, Site-II, Unnao File N0. 2421/AD-Sub.
The committee noted that terms of reference in the matter were prescribed in SEAC
meeting dated 14/09/2014. In this regard the project proponent has submitted that since the
project site lies in UPSIDC area, public hearing shall not be require as per provisions of EIA
Notification, 2006 so exemption from public hearing should be provided with regard to the
project. The committee discussed the matter in light of provisions of EIA Notification and
agreed to exempt the proposals from the requirement of public hearing as the site lies in
UPSIDC area. The project proponent also submitted that since there is no landfill site within
the project so word "landfill site" should be removed from the TOR. The committee
observed that at point no. 15 of terms of reference it is mentioned that ground water quality
around ETP, gaurd pond, solar evaporation pond and landfill site should be undertaken.
After examining the submission of project proponent, the committee deliberated to remove
the word landfill site from the point no. 15 of terms of reference. The project proponent
may be informed accordingly.
22. Group Housing Project “HOME” at DLF, Purseni, Rae Bareli Road, Lucknow, Sri
Sanjay Tiwari, GM (Operation), B-58, Sector-C, Mahanagar, LKO File N0. 3087/DD-
Sh.
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
19/06/2015 wherein the project proposals were recommended for grant of environmental clearance
however, the SEIAA in its meeting dated 04/08/2015 directed as follows:
"The SEIAA gone through the recommendations of the SEAC to grant the Prior Environmental
clearance to the title project and noted that under these recommendations the SEAC has directed the
project proponent to submit the information regarding mismatch of built up area, ultimate mode of
discharge, plan of water recharge, plan of solar panels installation, all approved lay-out plans, etc.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 19 of 24
In this regard the SEIAA is of the opinion that as so many information is still required, the project
proponent should be directed to submit this information and the SEAC should re-consider the matter. "
The matter was discussed by committee in its meeting dated 29/10/2015. A presentation was
made by Shri Himmat Singh, authorized representative of project proponent along with their
consultant M/s ENV DAS (I) Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the
presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The Built-up area in form-1 is misprinted as 1,49,124.86 m2 on page 1, while on page 4, Form 1A &
Conceptual Plan, it is mentioned as 1,49,851.67 m2. Kindly consider 1,49,851.67 m
2 as the final
figure:
FAR Permissible FAR @ 2.5 = 74800 m
2
Purchasable FAR @ 1.2= 35942.65 m2
Total Proposed FAR @ 3.7= 1,10,742.65m2
Non FAR Area Basement area: = 20709.07 m
2
Total Stilt area = 7931.24 m2
Total Podium area = 5365.31 m2
Other service area = 5103.4 m2
Total Non FAR Area: 39,109.02 m2
Total Built up area 149851.67 m
2
2. Dimensions of the swimming pool are: 20 x 12 x 1.2 m (= 288 m3). The make-up water required per
day has been taken approx. as 3% (=10 KLD), which includes evaporation, spillage/ splash-out &
backwash waste water losses.
3. 550 KLD capacity Modular STP will be installed in premises of Project H.O.M.E. 160 KLD tertiary
treated water will be used for flushing, horticulture & HVAC Cooling. 259 KLD of secondary
treated water will be discharged into DLF’s STP, which is of 2.65 MLD capacity. Water after
tertiary treatment would be utilized for flushing (0.44 MLD), HVAC Cooling (0.97 MLD) &
Horticulture (0.34 MLD) in DLF campus. Spare tertiary treated water will be disposed off in
adjacent nala.
4. Effective measures shall be taken for ground water recharge:
• Use of recycled water for flushing, HVAC cooling, horticulture etc, thus reducing usage of ground
water
• Use of water efficient fixtures, faucets etc. to ensure minimum wastage of water.
• Rainwater harvesting shall be done onsite through 7 recharging structures proposed. This will help in
replenishing groundwater.
• Recharge of ground water through treated water is not safe, hence recharge of ground water through
artificial water bodies is not recommended.
• However, 2 water bodies have already been provided in the township for rainfall run off.
5. Project Proponent commits 100% use of solar lights in open areas/ stair cases, as directed by
UPSEAC vide condition no. 28. Solar Lights Plan along internal roads is being submitted. Roof top
area allocated for solar panels is 1600 sqm. However, the plans for generation of solar power for
other uses is in conceptualization phase; hence a proposal with regards to installation of solar panels
along with allocation of space & other details will be submitted along with the compliance.
6. The building plans have been submitted in UPAVP for approval & shall be submitted in UPSEAC,
as and when received. Receiving of submission of drawings for approval in UPAVP is attached.
7. Structural stability certificate is attached. Structural stability drawings are being submitted in hard
copy.
8. Approved parking plans will be submitted, once they are approved by UPAPV.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 20 of 24
9. Fire & AAI NOC are submitted.
10. Revised form-1 is submitted.
The committee discussed the matter and directed that approved copy of layout
plan/maps/services plans should be submitted. Approved parking plan with parking requirement
calculation should also be submitted. The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
23. Leather Processing Unit at B-12, Leather Technology Park UPSIDC Area, Banthar,
Unnao, M/s Calico Trends Banthar Unit-II, Sri Farhan Ajmal. File N0. 2575/AD-H
The committee noted that an application dated 28/09/2014 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Leather Processing Unit at B-12, Leather Technology
Park UPSIDC Area, Banthar, Unnao, U.P. M/s Calico Trends Banthar Unit-II. The matter was
earlier discussed in SEAC meetings dated 01/06/2015 and 10/07/2015, wherein the project
proponent did not appear. The matter was again listed in SEAC meeting dated 29/10/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri Farhan Ajmal, project proponent along with their
consultant M/s Prakriti Consultants Services, Lucknow. The proponent, through the documents
submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Leather Processing Unit at B-12, Leather
Technology Park UPSIDC Area, Banthar, Unnao, M/s Calico Trends Banthar Unit-II.
2. Salient features of the project is as follows:
S.No Name of project M/s Calico Trends Bantar Unit II
Tannery ( Wet Blue to finish leather)
1 S.No in the Schedule 4 (f) leather/skin/hide processing industry
2 Category “B” , New Project
3 Location B-12, Leather Technology Park, UPSIDC Area, Banthar , Unnao, U.P
4 Latitude/ Longitude 28°29'24.27 "N / 80°27 50.20."E
5 Land Use of proposed
project
Leather Technology Park
6 Products Wet blue to finish leather
7 Plot area 2374 sqm
8 Green Belt 783 sqm (33 % of total Plot area).
9 Size/ Capacity of project 20000-40000 sqft/day
10 Raw Material Chrome Tanned Hides / Skin
11 Boiler Capacity 3 TPH
12 Coal Used 400 kg/hr
12 Total Water requirement 90 KLD from Bore Well
13 Waste water Discharge 72 KLD Primary Treatment Plant
15 Solid Waste 400 Kg/ day PETP Sludge
16 Power requirement 300KVA
17 Backup supply (DG set) 2 DG Set of 400 KVA Each
18 Nearest Town/ City Unnao (9km)
19 Nearest railway Station Unnao Railway Station (9km)
20 Nearest Airport Lucknow Airport (60 km)
21 Rain water harvesting pits 02 nos.
3. Area statement details of the project is as follows:
S.No Details Area (Sq.Mt)
1 Total Plot Area 2374.00
Covered Area of Basement Block A (Not included in F.A.R) 467.83
Ground Floor
A Covered Area of Block-A 29.92
B Covered Area of Block-B 1154.26
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 21 of 24
Total Covered Area of Ground Floor 1184.18
Covered Area of First Floors-Block B 458.92
Total Covered Area of Floor
Including Basement (Not included in F.A.R)
2110.93
Covered Area of Mumty & Machine Room (Basement (Not
included in F.A.R)
33.28
2 Total Covered Area 2144.21
3 Permissible Ground coverage (55%) 1305.70
4 Achieved Ground Coverage (49.88%) 1184.18
5 Permissible F.A.R (0.70) 1661.80
6 Achieved F.A.R (0.692) 1643.1
4. Land use details of the project:
S.No Land Use Area (Sq.mt) % of Plot
1 Green Area 783.42 33%
2 Ground Coverage 1184.18 49.88%
3 Open Space, Road & Parking 406.4 17.1
Total Plot Area 2374.00 100%
5. Product details of the project:
Particular Hides/Skin per day Weight of
Chrome Tanned
Shaved
Hides / Skin
Weight of Hides/Skin in Tonns per
Day
Finished
Leather
20000 -40000 sqft/per day
(Wet Blue to Finish leather)
7200
kg/day
7TPD
6. Raw material details:
• Wetting agents- 200 kgs/day Vegetable exacts-400 kgs/day
• Chrome powder -500 kgs/day Soda ash-100 kgs/day
• Sodium bi-carbonate-400 kgs/day Magnesium Oxide-21 kgs/day
• Sodium formate-400 kgs/day Preservative-5 kgs/day
• Synthetic tanning agents-1200 kgs/day Fat liquors-2000 kgs/day
• Dyes -400kgs/day Binders -1000 kgs/day
• Pigments- 500 kgs/day Top coats-300 kgs/day
• Wax emulsions-100 kgs/day Feel modifiers-25 kgs/day
• Formic acid-400 kgs/day
7. Water calculation details of the project:
S. N. Purpose Consumption rate Usage Total
Water
requirement
(KLD)
Approx Waste
water
generation
(KLD)
1 Process @ 10 lts per Kg hide To process 7200kg hides
72 58
2 Boiler (3 TPH) 2.5 KLD Boiler feed water 10 8
3 Staff @45 lts. Per capita 100 person 5 2
4. Visitors @ 15 lts. Per capita 10 1
5. Gardening 1 l/sqm 783 sqm 1
6. Cooling 0.9 l/KVA @ 8hrs 2 * 400 KVA 1 1
90KLD 72 KLD
8. Waste water treatment details:
• Total waste water generated is 72 KLD
• PETP and Chromium Recovery Unit will be installed
• Proposed ETP Capacity: 86 KLD
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 22 of 24
• ETP Area: 125 sqm (Approx)
• The TSS will be less than 600 mg/l, pH 6.5-9.5, Chromium less than 2.0 mg/l 9. The project proposals are covered under category 4"f" of EIA Notification, 2006.
The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit following
information:
1. Documents showing that the industry was part of list for which environmental clearance was
granted by MoEF at Banthar Industrial Area.
2. It should be ensured that standards for chromium discharge should be complied i.e.
maximum 02 mg/l. Plan should be submitted.
3. Allotment letter.
4. Copy of approved map from UPSIDC.
5. Provision of 33% green belt. Trees to be planted @ 1 tree per 80 sqm of area.
6. Setback area details.
7. Plan for solar provisions in open area.
8. NOC from UPPCB.
9. Total project cost is Rs. 2.48 cores. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan along with
budgetary provision amounting to 2% of project cost shall be prepared and approved by
Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the
authority alongwith list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address. 10. The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
24. Group Housing at “Jaypee Sports City”, Greater Noida, G B Nagar. Sri S. Sodi, 56/5,
Sector-62, Noida. File N0. 2148/AD-Sub.
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project file should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
(Dr. M. S. Khan)
Chairman, SEAC, UP
(Dr. S. N. Singh)
Member, SEAC, UP (Dr. S. K. Upadhyay)
Member, SEAC, UP
(S. C. Brahmachari) Member, SEAC, UP
(Dr. D. C. Gupta) Member, SEAC, UP
(Shruti Shukla) Secretary, SEAC, UP/
Director (I/c), Environment, UP
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 23 of 24
Annexure-1
General condition for Soil Mining Projects:
1. Any excavation work shall only be undertaken after obtaining permission of District
Administration under related rules.
2. No change is mining technology and scope of working shall be made without approval of
Authority.
3. Personnel working in dusty areas shall be provided with protective respiratory devices and
they shall also be imparted adequate training and information on safety and health aspects.
4. The Authority reserves the right to revoke the clearance if conditions stipulated are not
implemented. The Authority will also be entitled to impose additional environmental
conditions or modify the existing ones, if necessary. 5. In case of any deviation or alteration in the project proposed from those submitted to this
Authority for clearance, a fresh reference should be made to the Authority to assess the adequacy of the condition(s) imposed and to add additional environmental protection
Measures required, if any. 6. Concealing factual data or submission of false/fabricated data and failure to comply with
any of the conditions mentioned above may result in withdrawal of this clearance and attract action under the provisions of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
Minutes of 240th
SEAC Meeting Dated 29/10/2015
Page 24 of 24
Annexure-2
Specific Conditions for Soil Mining Projects: 1. This environmental clearance does not create or verify any claim of applicant on the proposed
site/activity.
2. The Environmental clearance will be co-terminus with the mining lease period
3. This environmental clearance shall be subject to valid lease in favour of project proponent for the
proposed mining proposals. In case, the project proponent does not have a valid lease, this
environmental clearance shall automatically become null and void.
4. The mining work will be open-cast and JCB shall be used for excavation work as proposed.
5. Top soil should be adequately preserved and should be used for landscaping.
6. Excavated soil should be properly stored in a manner not to increase surrounding SPM level. 7. Water sprinkling should be exercised during excavation and storage of soil for suppression of fugitive
dust.
8. Excavated area should be properly reclaimed and ensured that no open bore hole is left.
9. Safety measures for the people working at the site shall be duly taken care of as per law.
10. The excavation work shall be done in day time only.
11. The project boundary shall be properly covered to restrict dust dispersion.
12. Precautionary measures during soil excavation for conservation and protection of rare and endangered
flora and fauna found in the study area.
13. Equivalent Level of Noise level shall be maintained as per standards for both day and night.
14. The route map for soil transportation from excavation plots to work site should be firmed up and
necessary permissions shall be sought from District Administration.
15. Vehicles hired for the transportation should be in good condition and should have Pollution Check
Certificate and should conform to applicable air and noise emission standards.
16. Approach road will be maintained periodically.
17. Personnel exposure monitoring for respirable mineral dust shall be carried out for the workers and
records maintained including health records of the workers. Awareness program for workers on impact
of mining on their health and precautionary measures like use of personal protective equipments etc.
shall be carried out periodically. First aid facilities and adequate sanitary facility in the form of
temporary toilets/septic tanks.
18. Solid waste material viz gutkha rappers, plastic bags, glasses etc. to be generated during project
activity will be separately stored in bins and managed as per Solid Waste Management Rules.
19. Project proponent should maintain daily register for information of (a) collection of soil/clay, (b)
manpower & (c) transportation purpose.
The project proponent is also required to comply with following stipulations as per MoEF, GOI OM
No. 11011/47/2011-IA.II(M) dated 24/06/2013:
1. The borrowing/excavation activity shall be restricted to a maximum depth of 2 m below general
ground level at the site.
2. The borrowing/excavation activity shall be restricted to 2 m. above the ground water table at the site.
3. The borrowing/excavation activity shall not alter the natural drainage pattern of the area.
4. The borrowed/excavated pit shall be restored by the project proponent for useful purpose(s).
5. Appropriate fencing all around the borrowed/excavated pit shall be made to prevent any mishap.
6. Measures shall be taken to prevent dust emission by covering of borrowed/excavated earth during
transportation.
7. Safeguards shall be adopted against health risks on account of breeding of vectors in the water
bodies created due to borrowing/excavation of earth.
8. Workers/labourers shall be provided with facilities for drinking water and sanitation.
9. A berm shall be left from the boundary of adjoining field having a width equal to at least half the
depth of proposed excavation.
10. A minimum distance of 15 m from any civil structure shall be kept from the periphery of any
excavation area.