Transcript
  • Contact: Name Phone: +61 8 8313 0402 Email: [email protected]

    www.adelaide.edu.au

    More efficient malolactic fermentation by directed evolution of Lactobacillus plantarum

    Acknowledgements: This work is supported by Wine Australia (Project # UA1302) Wine Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology Laboratory (University of Adelaide1) 1The University of Adelaide is a member of the Wine Innovation Cluster

    Krista Sumby*, Paul R Grbin, Vladimir Jiranek

    University of Adelaide Department of Wine and Food Science, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia

    Introduction: •  Lactobacillus plantarum (Figure 1) is the LAB most

    typically used as an alternative to O. oeni in winemaking to carry out MLF.

    •  If a homofermetative strain is chosen Lb. plantarum

    will not increase volatile acidity and has a large potential to contribute positively to wine aroma.

    •  An important requirement of MLF is that the process is reliably completed in a timely manner.

    •  When an LAB starter strain is added to wine, it encounters multiple stressors, including low pH and high ethanol concentrations.

    •  Directed evolution (DE) was used to improve Lb. plantarum for more efficient and reliable MLF.

    •  The best isolates from the micro-plate screen (Figure 4) were selected for further screening in larger 50 ml cultures in Red FCDGJM (15% ethanol, pH 3.5) (Figure 5).

    Figure 4: Screening of adapted strains, micro-plate scale.

    Figure 5: Screening of best isolates from micro-plate screen in 50 ml FCDGJM (lab-scale).

    Hypothesis: •  Lb. plantarum will stabily adapt to its environment

    through evolution when placed under continuing and increasing stress conditions.

    Method: •  DE by continuous culture

    of improve Lb. plantarum (Lallemand) in fermented Chemically Defined Grape Juice Media (FCDGJM) (Figure 2).

    •  Over time ethanol was increased and pH decreased, for 300 generations.

    DE mixed culture

    Isolate single clones

    Identify the best strains by micro & larger-scale screening

    0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 1920

    1

    2

    3

    Time (h)

    L-m

    alic

    aci

    d (g

    /L)

    Mix continious cultureParent

    Continuous culture isolates

    Figure 2: Continuous culture of Lb. plantarum.

    Figure 1: Lb. plantarum 1000x magnification.

    Figure 3: Screening for improved isolates.

    Conclusion: DE has been used as a tool to improve Lb. plantarum and thereby improve its ability to complete MLF under difficult wine conditions. Isolates capable of faster MLF were found through a 2-step screening process.

    Evaluation of strain improvement: •  Screening of isolates from the continuous culture was

    performed in Red FCDGJM (14.5% ethanol, pH 3.3) at micro-plate scale and then 50ml scale to select for evolved strains (Figure 3).

    0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 1920

    1

    2

    3

    Time (hour)

    L-m

    alic

    aci

    d (g

    /L)

    ParentContinuous culture isolates

    Improved isolates


Top Related