Download - OER 2 MOOC
![Page 1: OER 2 MOOC](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012916/54b3132c4a7959ed058b4871/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
OER2MOOC
Robert SchuwerOpen Universiteit (Netherlands)
![Page 2: OER 2 MOOC](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012916/54b3132c4a7959ed058b4871/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
• A Model for MOOC
• Example
2
![Page 3: OER 2 MOOC](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012916/54b3132c4a7959ed058b4871/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
A Model for MOOC
CC-BY Hester Jelgerhuis
![Page 4: OER 2 MOOC](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012916/54b3132c4a7959ed058b4871/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Determine aim
• Why a MOOC?
• Target group
4
![Page 5: OER 2 MOOC](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012916/54b3132c4a7959ed058b4871/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
A model to use
• Grainne Conole
• Design phase
• Twelve dimensions
• Each dimension low, medium, high
• Quality and pedagogy as starting point
• http://mooc.efquel.org/a-new-classification-for-moocs-grainne-conole/
5
![Page 6: OER 2 MOOC](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012916/54b3132c4a7959ed058b4871/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Dimensions
• Open• Massive• Use of multimedia• Degree of communication• Degree of collaboration• Learning pathway
6
• Quality Assurance• Amount of reflection• Certification• Formal learning• Autonomy• Diversity
![Page 7: OER 2 MOOC](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012916/54b3132c4a7959ed058b4871/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Possible consequences
• Open: cohort or not? All content at once or publish each week separately?
• Learning pathway: consider different levels of expertise and knowledge?
• Formal & Certification: conditions (e.g. proctored exam)? Can that be organized?
• Overall: evaluation? Learning analytics for improvements?
7
![Page 8: OER 2 MOOC](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012916/54b3132c4a7959ed058b4871/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Quality of MOOC
• Quality label OpenUpEd
• Launched Feb 2014
• Mandatory and monitored
• Benchmark label:– Meeting criteria on MOOC– Existence of internal QA system
8
![Page 9: OER 2 MOOC](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012916/54b3132c4a7959ed058b4871/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Quality criteria on MOOC
• Openness to learners• Digital openness• Learner-centred approach• Independent learning• Media-supported interaction• Recognition options• Quality focus (production & presentation)• Spectrum of diversity (access)
9
![Page 10: OER 2 MOOC](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012916/54b3132c4a7959ed058b4871/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
CC-BY Hester Jelgerhuis
10
Example
![Page 11: OER 2 MOOC](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012916/54b3132c4a7959ed058b4871/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Steps
• Use the model of Conole to determine the demands on design
• Use the Quality model of OpenUpEd to specify the demands on quality
• Analyze what adaptations are needed– Design– Develop– Organisation
11