Partnership OverviewAugust 2016
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSThis presentation contains forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this presentation that address activities, events or developments that Antero Midstream Partners LP, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Partnership”) expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “foresee,” “should,” “would,” “could,” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, the absence of these words does not mean that the statements are not forward-looking. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, forward-looking statements contained in this presentation specifically include expectations of plans, strategies, objectives, and anticipated financial and operating results of the Partnership and Antero Resources Corporation (“Antero Resources”). These statements are based on certain assumptions made by the Partnership and Antero Resources based on management’s experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, anticipated future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the Partnership, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those implied or expressed by the forward-looking statements. These include the factors discussed or referenced under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and in the Partnership’s subsequent filings with the SEC.
The Partnership cautions you that these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause these statements to be inaccurate, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. These risks include, but are not limited to, Antero Resources’ expected future growth, Antero Resources’ ability to meet its drilling and development plan, commodity price volatility, inflation, environmental risks, drilling and completion and other operating risks, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in projecting future rates of production, cash flow and access to capital, the timing of development expenditures, and the other risks discussed or referenced under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and in the Partnership’s subsequent filings with the SEC.
Our ability to make future distributions is substantially dependent upon the development and drilling plan of Antero Resources, which itself is substantially dependent upon the review and approval by the board of directors of Antero Resources of its capital budget on an annual basis. In connection with the review and approval of the annual capital budget by the board of directors of Antero Resources, the board of directors will take into consideration many factors, including expected commodity prices and the existing contractual obligations and capital resources and liquidity of Antero Resources at the time.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Partnership undertakes no obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
1
Antero Midstream Partners LP is denoted as “AM” and Antero Resources Corporation is denoted as “AR” in the presentation, which are their respective New York Stock Exchange ticker symbols.
2
CHANGES SINCE JULY 2016 PRESENTATION
Updated AR slides showing 6/30 net acreage position pro forma for third party acreage acquisition Slide 14
Updated AR slides showing 6/30 undeveloped location count pro forma for third party acreage acquisition Slides 4, 21
Updated AM slides showing 2Q 2016 gathering, compression and EBITDA data Slide 16
Updated AR slides showing 6/30 hedge position and mark-to-market value Slides 26, 28
Updated AR slide showing 6/30 balance sheet and liquidity position pro forma Slide 28
491
638597
744
0100200300400500600700800900
1,000
Dedicated Acreage:Gathering & Compression
Dedicated Acreage:Water Services
ANTERO RESOURCES ACQUISITION BENEFITS AM
3
Antero Midstream Buildout
Compressor Station – In service
Districts with 3,000+ Antero Net Acres
Acquisition AcreageCompressor Station – Planned on Existing Acreage
Existing Gathering Line
New Platform for Antero Midstream
Infrastructure Buildout
Fresh Water Delivery Take PointPlanned Gathering Line
1. Includes projects currently under construction.
AM Gross Dedicated Acreage (000’s)
A unique opportunity as most Appalachian core acreage is already dedicated to third party midstream providers
12/31/2015 Pro Forma
Fresh Water ImpoundmentExisting Fresh Water LinePlaned Fresh Water Line
Planned Gathering Line –Acquisition Acreage
Compressor Station – Planned on Acquisition Acreage
On June 9, 2016 Antero Resources announced the acquisition of 66,500 net acres in the southwestern Marcellus Shale, over 95% of which will be dedicated to AM for gathering, compression, processing, and water services
Acquisition and associated equity financing allows Antero Resources to increase 2017 production target to 20% to 25%, providing further support to Antero Midstream’s 2017 distribution growth target of 28% to 30%
Expands Antero Midstream footprint and identified 5-year investment opportunity set by over 15% to ~$3.2 billion(1)
– Attractive organic investment opportunities at 4x to 7x build-out EBITDA
– Additional adjacent third-party midstream opportunities
Classification(1) Highly-Rich Gas/Condensate Highly-Rich GasBTU Regime 1275-1350 1275-1350 1275-1350 1200-1275 1200-1275 1200-1275EUR (Bcfe): 20.8 24.4 27.9 18.8 22.1 25.2EUR (MMBoe): 3.5 4.1 4.7 3.1 3.7 4.2% Liquids: 33% 33% 33% 24% 24% 24%Well Cost ($MM): $8.1 $8.1 $8.1 $8.1 $8.1 $8.1Bcf/1,000’ 1.7 2.0 2.3 1.7 2.0 2.3Bcfe/1,000’: 2.3 2.7 3.1 2.1 2.5 2.8Net F&D ($/Mcfe): $0.46 $0.39 $0.34 $0.51 $0.43 $0.38Pre-Tax NPV10 ($MM): $12.3 $15.9 $19.5 $8.2 $11.1 $13.9Pre-Tax ROR: 58% 77% 99% 38% 51% 66%Payout (Years): 1.5 1.1 0.9 2.1 1.6 1.3Breakeven NYMEX Gas Price ($/MMBtu)(5) $1.22 $0.95 $0.76 $2.02 $1.77 $1.57
Gross 3P Locations(3): 557 1,052Pro Forma Gross 3P Locations(3): 664 (19% Increase) 1,235 (17% Increase)
$12.3 $15.9 $19.5
$8.2$11.1 $13.9
58%77%
99%
38% 51%66%
0%20%40%60%80%100%
-$1.0$2.0$5.0$8.0
$11.0$14.0$17.0$20.0
1.72.3
2.02.7
2.33.1
1.72.1
2.02.5
2.32.8
Pre
-Tax
RO
R
Pre
-Tax
PV
-10
Pre-Tax PV-10 Pre-Tax ROR
4
NYMEX($/MMBtu)
WTI($/Bbl)
C3+ NGL(2)
($/Bbl)
2016 $3.04 $50 $222017 $3.18 $52 $262018 $3.02 $54 $272019 $3.00 $55 $282020 $3.06 $55 $282021-25 $3.53 $58 $30
Assumptions Natural Gas – 6/30/2016 strip Oil – 6/30/2016 strip NGLs – 37.5% of Oil Price
2016; ~50% of Oil Price 2017+
4535
2016 Development Plan: Completions
1. 6/30/2016 pre-tax well economics based on a 9,000’ lateral, 6/30/2016 natural gas and WTI strip pricing for 2016-2025, flat thereafter, NGLs at 37.5% of WTI for 2016 and ~50% of WTI thereafter, and applicable firm transportation and operating costs including 50% of Antero Midstream fees. Well cost estimates include $1.2 million for road, pad and production facilities. Assumes ethane rejection.
2. Pricing for a 1225 BTU y-grade ethane rejection barrel. NGLs at 37.5% of WTI for 2016 and ~50% of WTI for 2017 and thereafter. NGL prices are forecast to increase in 2017 relative to WTI due to projected in-service date of Mariner East 2 project allowing for a significant increase in AR NGL exports via ship.
3. Undeveloped Marcellus well locations as of 12/31/2015 adjusted for 6/30/2016 net acreage. 4. Represents actual results for 1Q 2016. 5. Breakeven price for 15% pre-tax rate of return.
Highly-Rich Gas/Condensate Highly-Rich Gas(4) (4)Bcf/1,000’
Bcfe/1,000’
MARCELLUS UPSIDE POTENTIAL While we have not changed our 1.7 Bcf/1,000' Marcellus project-wide type curve, we are seeing stronger EURs per 1,000' in a
significant portion of our Marcellus rich gas acreage for wells completed in the first half with at least 30 days of production history
Marcellus ShaleUtica Shale Ohio
5
Operating Highlights Top 20 best drilling footage days in
Marcellus since 2009 have all occurred in 2016, including 7,274’ drilled in 24 hours in West Virginia on the Hunter 1H
Recently drilled and cased longest lateral in company history at 14,024 feet
Stayed within targeted zone for 95% of lateral length of all wells drilled in Q2 2016
Increased sand placement during completions to 99% in Q2 2016
Utilizing new floating casing procedure, reducing casing run time by over 12 hours
Increased proppant and water loading by 25% in 2016 with encouraging results to date
1. Based on statistics for wells completed within each respective period.2. Ethane rejection assumed.3. Current D&C cost per 1,000’ lateral divided by net EUR per 1,000’ lateral assuming 81% NRI in Utica and 85% NRI in Marcellus.
Acquired Acreage
Utica Marcellus2014 2015 Q2 2016 Q2 2016 vs. 2014 2014 2015 Q2 2016 Q2 2016 vs. 2014
Activity LevelsAverage Rigs Running 4 5 1 (75%) 14 9 6 (57%)Average Completion Crews 2.0 3.0 1.0 (50%) 5.5 2.0 3.5 (36%)
Operational ImprovementsDrilling Days 29 31 16 45% 29 24 15 48%Average Lateral Length (Ft) 8,543 8,575 9,000 5% 8,052 8,910 9,000 12%Stages per Well 47 49 51 9% 40 45 45 12%Stage Length 183 175 175 4% 200 200 200 0%Stages per Day 3.2 3.7 4.4 38% 3.2 3.5 3.9 22%
Well Cost & Performance ImprovementsD&C per 1,000' of lateral ($MMs) $1.55 $1.36 $1.04 (33%) $1.34 $1.18 $0.90 (33%)Wellhead EUR per 1,000' of lateral (Bcf) (1) 1.4 1.6 1.6 14% 1.5 1.7 2.0 33%Processed EUR per 1,000' of lateral (Bcfe) (1)(2) 1.5 1.8 1.8 20% 1.8 1.9 2.3 28%Net development cost per processed Mcfe (2)(3) $1.28 $0.94 $0.72 (44%) $0.88 $0.73 $0.46 (47%)
CONTINUOUS OPERATING IMPROVEMENTS BY AR
1,194 1,128 1,117990 1,031 1,016 958 956
1,084 1,1261,274 1,304 1,337 1,418 1,480 1,530 1,578
1,7011,500
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,000
Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 2016Plan
Sand
Pla
ced
Per F
oot o
f Lat
eral
32 31 32 32 32 32 32 31 31 3234 34 35 36 37
3941
43
39
20222426283032343638404244
Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 2016Plan
Bar
rels
Per
Foo
t of L
ater
alADVANCED COMPLETIONS DRIVE INCREASED WATER VOLUMES
6
AR has Increased Proppant Load by Over 25% in the Marcellus and Utica
Pilot Testing Demonstrated Improved Recoveries While
Maintaining Well Density
New AR Marcellus Completion Designs Utilizing 38 to 40 Barrels of Water Per Lateral Foot, a 25% Increase
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2Q16 Actual 2016 Guidance 2017 Target
Gro
ss W
ellh
ead
Gas
Pro
duct
ion
(MM
cf/d
)AM VOLUME THROUGHPUT VS. AR PRODUCTION
7
1,755 MMcf/d
Third Party Gathering:402 MMcf/d
AM Compression Capacity
@ YE 2016:1,060 MMcf/d
AM Compression Capacity
@ YE 2017:1,420 MMcf/d
AM Compression: 658 MMcf/d
(80% Utilization)
AM LP: 1,353 MMcf/d(78% of AR Gross Wellhead Volume)
AR does not expect material growth in third party gathered
volumes through 2017
Third Party Gathering
Third Party Gathering
AM HP: 1,253 MMcf/d(93% of LP
Volume)
1,783 MMcf/d
2,184 MMcf/d
AR Gross Wellhead Gas Production (Including 3rd Party Gathering) Antero Midstream Volumes
• AM continues to gather and compress an increasing percentage of the total gross gas production
1. Assumes 3% fuel.
AM Compression Capacity:
820 MMcf/d
Production/Throughput Reconciliation (MMcf/d) 2Q16 AR Net Gas Production 1,311
Net Revenue Interest Gross-Up 80%Average Processing Shrink Gross-Up 94%
AR Gross Gas Production (MMcf/d) 1,755 - Third Party LP Gathering Volumes 402 = AM LP Gathering Volumes 1,353 - Fuel/Third Party HP Gathering Volumes(1) 7% = AM HP Gathering Volumes 1,253
132
96 MVC90
MVC100
MVC120
MVC120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
MB
bl/d
2017 MVC2017-2019 Earnout
Fresh Water Volumes (MBbl/d) 100 161Fresh Water Volumes (MBbls) 36,500 58,765
Volumes per Well Completion (MBbls)(2) 345 345Implied Well Completions (Annual) 105 170
SUSTAINABLE WATER BUSINESS GROWTH
81. Includes 70 deferred completions.2. Assumes 9,000 foot lateral and 39 Bbl/ft and 34 Bbl/ft of water for Marcellus and Utica, respectively.
Deferred completions drive substantial growth in 2017 and beyond, underpinned by minimum volume commitments
177
Com
plet
ions
~ 11
0 C
ompl
etio
ns(G
uida
nce)
2020 Earn Out – 200 MBbl/d Avg
131
Com
plet
ions
170-
180
Com
plet
ions
Targ
eted
(1)
Fresh Water Delivery Volumes (MBbl/d)“Traditional” Completions “Advanced” Completions
utilizing 25% more water
2017 targeted activity implies 155-165 MBbl/d of delivered water
2019 Earn Out – 161 MBbl/d Avg
ANTERO MIDSTREAM EXERCISES STONEWALL OPTION
• Antero Midstream has exercised its option to acquire a 15% non-operated equity interest in the Stonewall gathering pipeline- Capital investment: $45 million- Expected unlevered IRR: 25% - 35%- Effective date: May 26, 2016
●Another step towards becoming “full value chain” midstream provider
- Fixed fee revenues with minimum volume commitments
●Antero Resources is an anchor shipper with the ability to transport up to 1.1 Bcf/d of gas on a firm basis (900 MMcf/d minimum volume commitment) to more favorably priced markets including TCO, NYMEX and Gulf Coast markets
- Currently transporting ~950 MMcf/d
Stonewall Gathering Pipeline Option
Throughput Capacity: 1.4 Bcf/d
Pipeline Specifications: 67 miles of 36-inch pipeline
Project Capital: ≈ $400 Million
In-Service Date: 12/1/2015
AR Firm Commitment: 900 MMcf/d 9
Stonewall Gathering Pipeline Asset Details
Acquisition Acreage
WHY OWN ANTERO MIDSTREAM?
10
Best-in-class distribution growth guidance of 30% in 2016 and 28% to 30% target for 2017 Strong DCF coverage of 1.60x in 1Q16 and 1.45x in 2015, above 1.1x–1.2x target
Strong Distribution Growth & Coverage
Sponsor Strength
Organic Investment Opportunity Set
Full Value Chain Midstream
Opportunity
Financial Flexibility
Aligned High Growth
Sponsor
$3.9 billion of consolidated liquidity; stable leverage through the down cycle Ba2/BB corporate ratings affirmed; $4.5 billion AR borrowing base affirmed 94% of forecasted production hedged through 2018 at $3.81/MMBtu Peer leading realized prices and EBITDAX margins
Identified organic investment opportunity set of $3.2 billion over the next five years “Just-in-time capital” results in more capital efficient project economics, while avoiding the
competitive acquisition market and reliance on capital markets Organic growth strategy results in investment build-out EBITDA multiples of 4x–7x vs.
drop-downs of 8x–12x
Opportunity to expand gathering, compression, and water services to third parties Right of first offer for processing, fractionation, transportation and marketing activities Midstream provider for the largest and most active operator in Appalachia inherently brings
additional downstream opportunities to AM
$750 million of liquidity and 2.4x debt to EBITDA ratio at June 30, 2016
17% production growth guidance in 2016 and 20% to 25% growth targeted for 2017 drives AM volume growth
Continuous operating improvements, including more water and sand in completions resulting in improved recoveries and well economics for AR and higher volumes for AM
AR has a 62% LP ownership in AM, resulting in direct alignment with midstream value creation
Sustainable Business
Model
High Growth Sponsor Drives AM Throughput
and Distribution Growth
Largest Dedicated Core Liquids-Rich Acreage Position in Appalachia
$800 Million ofAM Liquidity
11
Premier E&P Operator in Appalachia
100% Fixed Fee and Largest Firm Transport
and Hedge Portfolio
Opportunity to Build Out Northeast Value Chain
Growth Liquids-Rich
Value Chain
Opportunity
HighVisibility
SponsorStrength
LEADING UNCONVENTIONAL MIDSTREAM BUSINESS MODEL
“Just-in-time” Non-Speculative Capital Program
Strong Financial Position
Mitigated Commodity
Risk
1
2 3
4
5
67
8
Premier AppalachianMidstream Partnership
Run by Co-Founders
Hedges Bolster Solid Well Economics
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
AR Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 5 Peer 4 Peer 6
Pro Forma Core Net Acres - DryCore Net Acres - DryPro Forma Core Net Acres - Liquids-RichCore Net Acres - Liquids-Rich
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
AR EQT RRC COG CNX CHK SWN
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,000
EQT AR CHK COG RRC SWN CNX
SPONSOR STRENGTH – LEADERSHIP IN APPALACHIAN BASIN
Top Producers in Appalachia (Net MMcfe/d) – 2Q 2016(1)(2) Top 12 U.S. Natural Gas Producers (Net MMcf/d) – 2Q 2016(1)
Appalachian Producers by Proved Reserves (Bcfe) – YE 2015(1)(2) Appalachian Producers by Core Net Acres (000’s) – June 2016(4)
1. Based on company filings and presentations. Excludes pro forma additions via acquisitions. CHK and DVN production figures based off 1Q2016 data.2. Appalachian only production and reserves where available. Excludes companies that do not break out Appalachian production including CVX, HES and XOM. 3. Includes proved reserves categorized in “Northern Division” consisting of Utica Shale, Marcellus Shale and Powder River Basin.4. Based on Antero geologic interpretation supported by state well data, company presentations and public land data. Peer group includes CNX, COG, EQT, RRC, SWN, CHK. EQT adjusted for STO acreage acquisition.
(3)
12
2nd Largest Appalachian Producer in
2Q ‘16
Appalachian Peers
8th Largest U.S. Gas Producer in
2Q ‘16
Largest Proved Reserve Base In
Appalachia Antero Has the Largest Liquids-Rich Core
Position in Appalachia
) ) ) )
Antero has the largest proved reserve base, largest core liquids-rich acreage position and is one of the largest producers in the Appalachian Basin
(1)(1)(1)
$198 $341
$434
$649
$1,164 $1,221
$1,386
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E
NGLs (C3+) Oil Ethane
5 2466,436
23,051
48,298
66,000
37% GrowthGuidance
1,750
2,144
0
600
1,200
1,800
2,400
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E
Marcellus Utica Guidance
30 124239
522
1,007
1,493
13
AVERAGE NET DAILY PRODUCTION (MMcfe/d)
0
50
100
150
200
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E
Marcellus Utica Deferred Completions
1938
60
114
177 181
131110
180
OPERATED GROSS WELLS COMPLETED
AVERAGE NET DAILY LIQUIDS PRODUCTION (Bbl/d)
17% Growth
Guidance23% Growth
Target(1)
Antero is in the unique position of being able to sustain growth and value creation through the price down cycle
CONSOLIDATED EBITDAX ($MM)
StreetConsensus(2)
SPONSOR STRENGTH – MOMENTUM THROUGH THE DOWN CYCLE
1. Represents midpoint of updated 2017 production guidance of 20% to 25% per press release dated 6/9/2016. 2. Represents Bloomberg street consensus estimates as of 6/30/2016.
Note: 2015 SEC prices were $2.56/MMBtu for natural gas and $50.13/Bbl for oil on a weighted average Appalachian index basis. 1. Pro forma for third-party acreage acquisition announced per press release dated 6/9/2016, updated for exercise of tag along right. 3P reserve additions are unaudited. 14 to 18 Tcf Utica dry resource in
WV/PA. 2. 3P reserve pre-tax PV-10 based on annual strip pricing for first 10-years and flat thereafter as of December 31, 2015. NGL pricing assumes 39%, 46% and 48% of WTI strip prices for 2016, 2017 and
2018 and thereafter, respectively. $1.5 billion 3P PV-10 estimate for acreage acquisition, using 12/31/2015 strip pricing and same year end 2015 assumptions, is unaudited. 3. Virtually all WV/PA Utica Shale net acres are included among the net acres of Marcellus Shale rights as they are stacked pay formations attributable to the same leasehold. 4. Antero and industry rig locations as of 6/24/2016, per RigData.
14
COMBINED TOTAL – 12/31/15 RESERVESAssumes Ethane RejectionNet Proved Reserves 13.2 TcfeNet 3P Reserves(1) 42.1 TcfeStrip Pre-Tax 3P PV-10(2) $12.7 BnNet 3P Reserves & Resource(1) 57 to 60 TcfeNet 3P Liquids(1) 1,377 MMBbls% Liquids – Net 3P(1) 20%2Q 2016 Net Production 1,762 MMcfe/d- 2Q 2016 Net Liquids 75,041 Bbl/dNet Acres(1)(3) 641,000Undrilled 3P Locations(1) 4,344
OHIO UTICA SHALE CORE
Net Proved Reserves 1.8 TcfeNet 3P Reserves 7.5 TcfeStrip Pre-Tax 3P PV-10(2) $2.5 BnNet Acres 147,000Undrilled 3P Locations 814
MARCELLUS SHALE CORE
Net Proved Reserves 11.4 TcfeNet 3P Reserves(1) 34.6 TcfeStrip Pre-Tax 3P PV-10(2) $10.2 BnNet Acres(1) 494,000Undrilled 3P Locations(1) 3,530
WV/PA UTICA SHALE DRY GASNet Resource 14.3 to 17.8 TcfNet Acres 231,000Undrilled Locations 2,269
012345678
Rig
Cou
nt
Operators
SW Marcellus + Utica Rigs(4)
SPONSOR STRENGTH – MOST ACTIVE OPERATOR AR is operating 30% of all rigs running and 70% of rigs running in liquids rich core areas in Appalachia
110
050
100150200250300350400
2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
Ann
ual C
ompl
etio
ns
Marcellus 3P Completions Ohio Utica Completions
Antero plans to develop over 1,000 horizontal locations in the Marcellus and Ohio Utica by the end of the decade while reducing less than 25% of its current 3P drilling inventory
PLANNED ANTERO WELL COMPLETIONS BY YEAR
CURRENT UNDRILLED 3P LOCATIONS (1) ESTIMATED YE 2020 UNDRILLED 3P LOCATIONS
4,344 Locations 3,309 Locations
Expect to place >1,000 Marcellus and Utica wells
to sales by YE 2020
Condensate4%
Highly-Rich Gas29%Rich Gas
20%
Dry Gas28%
Highly-Rich Gas/Condensate
19%
Condensate, 5%
Highly-Rich Gas/Condens
ate(8%)
Highly-Rich Gas33%
Rich Gas, 20%
Dry Gas, 34%
Highly-Rich Gas/Condensate
8%
1. Marcellus and Utica 3P locations pro forma for acreage acquisition announced 6/9/2016. Excludes WV/PA Utica Dry locations.
Average Lateral Length ~8,800 feet
15
38% to 62% IRRs
17% to 49% IRRs
58% to 66% IRRs 19% to 44%
IRRs
21% IRR
SPONSOR STRENGTH – LEADERSHIP IN APPALACHIANCORE DRILLING INVENTORY
$1 $5 $7 $8 $11$19
$28$36
$41
$55
$83 $80$88
$0$10$20$30$40$50$60$70$80$90
$100
26 31 40 36 41 116
222
358
454 435478
606 657
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800Utica Marcellus
10 38 80 126 266
531
908
1,134 1,197 1,216 1,195 1,222 1,253
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,800 Utica Marcellus
108 216 281 331 386
531
738 935
965 1,038 1,124
1,303 1,353
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,800
Utica Marcellus
Low Pressure Gathering (MMcf/d)
Compression (MMcf/d)
High Pressure Gathering (MMcf/d)
EBITDA ($MM)
16
$338
Note: Y-O-Y growth based on 2Q’15 to 2Q’16 for throughput and 1Q’15 to 1Q’16 for EBITDA. 1. Represents midpoint of updated 2016 guidance.
GROWTH – HIGH GROWTH MIDSTREAM THROUGHPUT
$215
$0.170 $0.180 $0.190 $0.205
$0.235 $0.250
1.1x
1.2x1.3x
1.4x
1.8x
1.6x1.7x
0.0x
0.2x
0.4x
0.6x
0.8x
1.0x
1.2x
1.4x
1.6x
1.8x
2.0x
$0.000
$0.050
$0.100
$0.150
$0.200
$0.250
$0.300
$0.350
$0.400
$0.450
$0.500
4Q14A 1Q15A 2Q15A 3Q15A 4Q15A 1Q16A 2Q16A 3Q16E 4Q16E 1Q17E 2Q17E 3Q17E 4Q17E
Distribution Per Unit (Left Axis) DCF Coverage (Right Axis)
$0.220
17
• Antero Midstream is targeting 28% to 30% annual distribution growth through 2017• AM has delivered on those targets with DCF coverage of 1.7x in the second quarter 2016
Note: Future distributions subject to AM Board approval.1. Assumes midpoint of target distribution growth range.
GROWTH – TOP TIER DISTRIBUTION GROWTH AND COVERAGE
GROWTH – ORGANIC GROWTH STRATEGY DRIVES VALUE CREATION
18
• Organic growth strategy provides attractive returns and project economics, while avoiding the competitive acquisition market and reliance on capital markets
• Industry leading organic growth story
– ~$1.9 billion in capital spent through 09/30/2015 on gathering and compression and water assets
– $410 million in additional growth capital forecast for the twelve-month period ending 12/31/16 (excludes $25 million of maintenance capital)
– 5-year identified investment opportunity set of $3.2 billion
Note: Precedent data per IHS Herold’s research and public filings.1. Antero organic multiple calculated as estimated gathering and compression and water capital expended through Q3 2015 divided by midpoint of 2016 EBITDA guidance of $325 to $350 million,
assuming 12-15 month lag between capital incurred and full system utilization.2. Selected gathering and compression drop down acquisitions since 1/1/2012. Drop down multiples are based on NTM EBITDA. Source: Barclays.
5.5x
11.5x
10.8x10.5x
9.3x9.0x 8.8x 8.7x 8.6x 8.6x
8.2x7.9x 7.8x
6.9x
0.0x
1.0x
2.0x
3.0x
4.0x
5.0x
6.0x
7.0x
8.0x
9.0x
10.0x
11.0x
12.0x
Drop Down Multiple(2)
Organic EBITDA Multiple vs. Precedent Drop Down Multiples
Median: 8.8x
Value creation for the AM unit holder =Build at 4x to 7x EBITDA
vs.Drop Down / Buy at 8x to 12x EBITDA
LPGathering
HPGathering Compression
CondensateGathering
Fresh Water Delivery
Advanced Wastewater Treatment
Stonewall GatheringPipeline
Processing/Fractionation
Unlevered IRR Range: 25% - 35% 15% - 25% 10% - 20% 25% - 35% 30% - 40% 15% - 25% 25% - 35% 15% - 20% Payout (Years): 2.5 - 4.0 3.5 - 4.5 4.0 - 6.5 2.0 - 3.5 2.0 – 3.0 6.0 - 8.0 2.0 - 3.5 5.0 - 6.0 Minimum Volume Commitments: N/A 75% 70% N/A Yes N/A 80% 80%
2016 Expansion Capex(2) Total
Marcellus $433 $33 $49 $143 - $33 $130 $45 Utica 22 7 1 7 - 7 - -
Growth Capex $455 $40 $50 $150 $0 $40 $130 $45 % of Capex 100% 9% 11% 33% 0% 9% 28% 10%
Included in 2016 Budget: Marcellus & Utica
Marcellus & Utica
Marcellus & Utica
Utica Marcellus & Utica
Marcellus & Utica
Marcellus Not Included
5-year identified investment opportunity set
$3.2 B 30% - 35% 15% - 20% 30% - 35% 0% 8% - 12% 6% - 8% 1%
Additional In-hand Opportunities:
Dry Utica Dry Utica Dry Utica Utica Stabilization
Dry Utica Dry Utica Marcellus Processing/
Fractionation
25%
15%
10%
25%
30%
15%
25%
15%
35%
25%
20%
35%
25% 25%
40%
20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Inte
rnal
Rat
e of
Ret
urn
19
Project Economics by Segment(1)
GROWTH – ESTIMATED PROJECT ECONOMICS BY SEGMENT
1. Based on management capex, operating cost and throughput assumptions by project. Capex guidance updated per 2016 Partnership guidance press release. 2. Excludes $25.0 million of maintenance capex. Includes Stonewall option exercise.
Wtd. Avg. 21% IRR
AM Option Opportunities
35%
Source: Core outlines and peer net acreage positions based on investor presentations, news releases and 10-K/10-Qs. Rig information per RigData as of 5/27/2016.1. Based on company filings and presentations.
• Pro forma for the recent acreage acquisition, Antero controls an estimated 39% of the NGLs in the liquids-rich core of the two plays
• Antero has the largest core liquids-rich position in Appalachia with ≈420,000 net acres (> 1100 Btu)
• Represents over 24% of core liquids-rich acreage in Marcellus and Utica plays combined
AR is operating 24% of all rigs running and 58% of rigs running in liquids rich core areas in Appalachia Antero has over 3,080 undeveloped rich gas locations in its 3P reserves as of 12/31/2015, pro forma for the pending acreage acquisition
0
100
200
300
400
500
(000
s)
Core Liquids-Rich Net Acres(1)
20
Incremental core liquids-rich acreage included in pending acquisition
Antero Others Total Antero % Antero Others Total Antero %Marcellus 7 54 61 11% 6 12 18 33%Utica 4 27 31 13% 1 10 11 9%Basin Total 11 81 92 12% 7 22 29 24%
Y-O-Y Difference (4) (59) (63) 12%Source: RigData
Operated Rigs June 2015 Operated Rigs June 2016
LIQUIDS-RICH – LARGEST CORE DRILLING INVENTORY
$1.55$1.36
$1.04
$0.000
$0.500
$1.000
$1.500
$2.000
2014 2015 Current
$MM
/1,0
00’ L
ater
al
Well Cost ($MM/1,000' of Lateral)
12% Decrease vs. 2014
24% Decrease vs. 2015
664 1,235
691 940
69%
48%
24% 28%58%
38%17% 19%
0
400
800
1,200
1,600
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Highly-RichGas/
Condensate
Highly-Rich Gas Rich Gas Dry Gas
Tota
l 3P
Loca
tions
RO
R
Total 3P Locations ROR @ 6/30/2016 Strip Pricing - After Hedges ROR @ 6/30/2016 Strip Pricing - Before Hedges
184
98 108 161
263
24%
79% 84%70% 71%
21%
66% 62%49% 44%
0
100
200
300
0%20%40%60%80%
100%
Condensate Highly-RichGas/
Condensate
Highly-RichGas
Rich Gas Dry Gas
Tota
l 3P
Loca
tions
RO
R
MARCELLUS WELL ECONOMICS(1)(2)(3)
Marcellus Well Cost Improvement(4)
1. 6/30/2016 pre-tax well economics based on 1.7 Bcf/1,000’ type curve for Marcellus 9,000’ lateral, 6/30/2016 natural gas and WTI strip pricing for 2016-2025, flat thereafter, NGLs at 37.5% of WTI for 2016 and ~50% of WTI thereafter, and applicable firm transportation and operating costs including 50% of Antero Midstream fees. Well cost estimates include $1.2 million for road, pad and production facilities.
2. ROR @ 6/30/2016 Strip-With Hedges reflects 6/30/2016 well cost ROR methodology, with the 6/30/2016 hedge value allocated based on 2016-2021 projected production volumes resulting in blend of strip and hedge prices.
3. Marcellus undeveloped well locations as of 12/31/2015 adjusted for 6/30/2016 net acreage and pro forma for third-party acreage acquisition per press release dated 6/9/2016. 4. Current spot well costs based on $8.1 million for a 9,000’ lateral Marcellus well and $9.4 million for a 9,000’ lateral Utica well.
21
UTICA WELL ECONOMICS(1)(2)
73% of Marcellus locations are processable (1100-plus Btu) 68% of Utica locations are processable (1100-plus Btu)
2016Drilling
Plan
Antero has reduced average well costs for a 9,000’ lateral by 33% in the Marcellus and 33% in the Utica as compared to 2014 well costs At 6/30/2016 strip pricing, Antero has 2,713 locations that exceed a 20% rate of return (excluding hedges)
– Including hedges, these locations generate rates of return of approximately 48% to 84%
Utica Well Cost Improvement(4)
$1.34$1.18
$0.90
$0.000
$0.500
$1.000
$1.500
$2.000
2014 2015 Current
$MM
/1,0
00’ L
ater
al
Well Cost ($MM/1,000' of Lateral)
12% Decrease vs. 2014
24% Decrease vs. 2015
SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS MODEL – HEDGES BOLSTER SOLID WELL ECONOMICS
22
In-service 2016 Budget
HIGH VISIBILITY – PROJECTED MARCELLUSMIDSTREAM BUILDOUT
23
In-service 2016 Budget
HIGH VISIBILITY – PROJECTED UTICAMIDSTREAM BUILDOUT
7
0
3
02
6
02468
AM CNNX EQM CMLP SMLP RMP
Fixed Fee
100%
Fixed Fee
100%
24
MITIGATED COMMODITY RISK – 100% FIXED FEE – RICH TO DRY
Contract Mix
Fixed Fee98%
Fixed Fee
100%
Fixed Fee
100%Fixed Fee90%
(1)
.
Source: Core net acreage positions based on investor presentations, news releases and 10-K/10-Qs.1. Represents assets held at MLP.2. Rig count as of 6/24/2016, per RigData.3. Includes Antero Resources rigs located in Doddridge County, WV operating on SMLP assets.
CommodityBased
CommodityBased
Appalachian ExposureMarcellus – Dry
Marcellus – Rich
Utica – Dry
Utica – Rich
Water Services
Rigs Running on Midstream Footprint (2)
(3)
AM has no direct commodity price exposure
- 500,000
1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 5,000,000 5,500,000
Gross Gas Production (BBtu/d)
25
BBtu/d
Antero Resources Transportation Portfolio• Antero Resources has built the largest firm transportation portfolio in Appalachian Basin with 4.85 BBtu/d by year end 2018• Realized $0.01/Mcfe differential to Nymex gas prices in 1Q16, before hedges
2015 2016E 2017E 2018EFavorable:ChicagoMichConGulf CoastNYMEXTCO
AR Increasing Access to Favorable Markets
Less favorable:TETCO M2Dominion South
74%
26%
99%
1%
97%
3%
97%
3%
(Stonewall/WB) Mid-Atlantic/NYMEX
(Stonewall/TGP) Gulf Coast
(TCO) Appalachia or Gulf Coast
AppalachiaAppalachia
(REX/ANR/NGPL/MGT) Midwest
(ANR/Rover) Gulf Coast
MITIGATED COMMODITY RISK – FIRM TRANSPORTATION & SALES PORTFOLIO
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$MM
26
Hedging is a key component of Antero’s business model which includes development of a large, repeatable drilling inventory– Locks in higher returns in a low commodity price environment and reduces the amount of time for well payouts, thereby
enhancing liquidity Antero has realized $2.4 billion of gains on commodity hedges since 2009
– Gains realized in 29 of last 30 quarters, or 97% of the quarters since 2009● Based on Antero’s hedge position and strip pricing as of 6/30/2016, the unrealized commodity derivative value is $2.1 billion● Significant additional hedge capacity remains under the credit facility hedging covenant for 2020 – 2022 period
Quarterly Realized Hedge Gains / (Losses)
Realized Hedge GainsProjected Hedge Gains
NYMEX Natural Gas Historical Spot Prices
($/MM
Btu)
NYMEX Natural Gas Futures Prices 06/30/16
3.4 Tcfe Hedged at average price of
$3.71/Mcfe through 2022
Average Hedge Prices ($/MMBtu)
$3.36
$3.96
$3.57$3.91
$3.70 $3.66$3.24
$2.1 Billion in Projected Hedge
Gains Through 2022Realized $2.4 Billion in Hedge Gains
Since 2009
HEDGING – INTEGRAL TO BUSINESS MODEL
(1)
1. Represents average hedge price for six months ending 12/31/2016.
Regional Gas Pipelines – 15% Ownership
Miles Capacity In-Service
Stonewall Gathering Pipeline(3)
50 1.4 Bcf/d Yes
1. Acquired by AM from AR for a $1.05 billion upfront payment and a $125 million earn out in each of 2019 and 2020.2. Antero Midstream has a right of first offer on 220,000 dedicated net acres for processing and fractionation pro forma for third-party acreage acquisition.3. Antero Midstream owns 15% stake in Stonewall pipeline.
EndUsers
EndUsers
Gas Processing
Y-Grade Pipeline
Long-Haul Interstate
Pipeline
InterConnect
NGL Product Pipelines
Fractionation
Compression
Low Pressure Gathering
Well Pad
Terminalsand
Storage
(Miles) YE 2015 YE 2016E
Marcellus 106 114
Utica 55 56
Total 161 170
AM has option to participate in processing, fractionation,
terminaling and storage projects offered to AR
(Miles) YE 2015 YE 2016E
Marcellus 76 98
Utica 36 36
Total 112 134
(MMcf/d) YE 2015 YE 2016E
Marcellus 700 940
Utica 120 120
Total 820 1,060
AM Owned Assets
Condensate GatheringStabilization
(Miles) YE 2015 YE 2016E
Utica 19 19
EndUsers
(Ethane, Propane, Butane, etc.)
27
VALUE CHAIN OPPORTUNITY – FULL MIDSTREAM VALUE CHAIN
AM Option Opportunities(2)
AM recently exercised its option on 15% interest in Stonewall, adding a regional gas gathering pipeline to its portfolio
Liquid “non-E&P assets” of $5.2 Bnsignificantly exceeds total debt of $3.9 Bn pro
forma for equity offering shoe exercise
Pro Forma Liquidity
LIQUIDITY – STRONG BALANCE SHEET AND FLEXIBILITY Antero Resources (NYSE:AR) Antero Midstream (NYSE:AM)
Pro Forma 6/30/2016 Debt Liquid Non-E&P Assets 6/30/2016 Debt Liquid Assets
Debt Type $MMCredit facility $556
6.00% senior notes due 2020 525
5.375% senior notes due 2021 1,000
5.125% senior notes due 2022 1,100
5.625% senior notes due 2023 750
Total $3,931
Asset Type $MMCommodity derivatives(1) $2,096
AM equity ownership(2) 3,035
Cash 19
Total $5,150
Asset Type $MMCash $19
Credit facility – commitments(3) 4,000
Credit facility – drawn (556)
Credit facility – letters of credit (708)
Total $2,755
Debt Type $MMCredit facility $760
Total $760
Asset Type $MMCash $9
Total $9
Liquidity
Asset Type $MMCash $9
Credit facility – capacity 1,500
Credit facility – drawn (760)
Credit facility – letters of credit -
Total $749
Approximately $2.8 billion of liquidity at AR pro forma for equity offering shoe exercise plus an
additional $3.0 billion of AM units
Approximately $750 million of liquidityat AM
28
Only 51% of AM credit facility capacity drawn
Note: All balance sheet data as of 6/30/2016. Antero Resources pro forma for $85 million net proceeds from shoe exercise and $546 million cost of acreage acquisition including tag along right less $45 million deposit. 1. Mark-to-market as of 6/30/2016.2. Based on AR ownership of AM units (108.9 million common and subordinated units) and AM’s closing price as of 6/30/2016.3. AR credit facility commitments of $4.0 billion, borrowing base of $4.5 billion.
0.0x0.5x1.0x1.5x2.0x2.5x3.0x3.5x4.0x4.5x
Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 Peer 5 Peer 6 Peer 7
Tota
l Deb
t / L
TM A
djus
ted
EBIT
DA
• $1.5 billion revolver in place to fund future growth capital (5x Debt/EBITDA Cap)
• Liquidity of $749 million at 6/30/2016
• Sponsor (NYSE: AR) has Ba2/BB corporate debt ratings
AM Liquidity (6/30/2016)
AM Peer Leverage Comparison(1)
($ in millions)
Revolver Capacity $1,500
Less: Borrowings 760
Plus: Cash 9
Liquidity $749
1. As of 3/31/2016. Peers include TEP, EQM, WES, RMP, SHLX, DM, and CNNX.2. AM includes full year EBITDA contribution from water business.
Financial Flexibility
29
(2)
2.3x
STRONG FINANCIAL POSITION – SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL FLEXIBILITY
TOP TIER DISTRIBUTION GROWTH & HEALTHY COVERAGE
30
3–Year Street Consenus Distribution Growth Rate and DCF Coverage(1)
1. Based on Bloomberg 2015-2018 Bloomberg consensus estimates as of 6/30/2016.
31%
26% 26% 24% 23% 22%19%
12% 12%
8%
1.7x
1.3x1.4x
2.0x
1.3x1.3x
1.4x 1.4x
1.2x 1.2x
0.0x
0.2x
0.4x
0.6x
0.8x
1.0x
1.2x
1.4x
1.6x
1.8x
2.0x
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
SHLX PSXP AM VLP DM TEP EQM CNNX MPLX WES
EQMDM
SHLX
CNNX
WESTEP
MPLX
PSXPVLPRMP
AM – 6/30/2016Yield: 3.37%
Price: $27.87/unit
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
3% 8% 13% 18% 23% 28% 33%
Yiel
d (%
)
2016-2018 Distribution Growth CAGRBubble Size Reflects Market Capitalization
ATTRACTIVE VALUE PROPOSITION
31
• Attractive appreciation potential on a relative basis
1. Based on Bloomberg 2015-2018 Bloomberg consensus distribution estimates and market data as of 6/30/2016.
R-squared = 66%
Antero Midstream (NYSE: AM)Asset Overview
32
1. Represents inception to date actuals as of 12/31/2015 and 2016 guidance.2. Includes both expansion capital and maintenance capital.
33
UticaShale
MarcellusShale
Projected Gathering and Compression Infrastructure(1)
Marcellus Shale
Utica Shale Total
YE 2015 Cumulative Gathering/ Compression Capex ($MM) $981 $462 $1,443
Gathering Pipelines(Miles) 182 91 273
Compression Capacity(MMcf/d) 700 120 820
Condensate Gathering Pipelines (Miles) - 19 19
2016E Gathering/Compression Capex Budget ($MM)(2) $235 $20 $255
Gathering Pipelines (Miles) 30 1 31
Compression Capacity(MMcf/d) 240 - 240
Condensate Gathering Pipelines (Miles) - - -
Gathering and Compression Assets
ANTERO MIDSTREAM GATHERING AND COMPRESSION ASSET OVERVIEW
• Gathering and compression assets in core of rapidly growing Marcellus and Utica Shale plays
– Acreage dedication of ~576,000 gross leasehold acres for gathering and compression services
– Additional stacked pay potential with dedication on ~278,000 gross acres of Utica deep rights underlying the Marcellus in WV and PA
– 100% fixed fee long term contracts
• AR owns 62% of AM units (NYSE: AM)
Acquisition Acreage
ANTERO MIDSTREAM ASSETS – RICH GAS MARCELLUS
34
• Provides Marcellus gathering and compression services
− Liquids-rich gas is delivered to MWE’s 1.2 Bcf/d Sherwood processing complex
• Significant growth projected over the next twelve months as set out below:
• Antero plans to operate an average of five drilling rigs in the Marcellus Shale during 2016, including intermediate rigs
− 100% of rigs targeting the highly-rich gas/condensate and highly-rich gas regimes
• All 80 gross wells targeted to be completed in 2016 are in the AM dedicated area
− AM dedicated acreage contains 2,126 gross undeveloped Marcellus locations
• Antero will defer an additional 62 completions, with 20 being wells dedicated to a third-party midstream provider that were originally scheduled for completion in 2016 but will now be carried into 2017, in order to limit natural gas volumes sold into unfavorable pricing markets
Marcellus Gathering & Compression
Note: Antero acreage position reflects tax districts in which greater than 3,000 net acres are owned.
YE 2015 YE 2016E
Low Pressure Gathering Pipelines (Miles)
106 114
High Pressure Gathering Pipelines (Miles)
76 98
Compression Capacity (MMcf/d) 700 940
Acquisition Acreage
35
• Provides Utica gathering and compression services− Liquids-rich gas delivered into MWE’s 800 MMcf/d
Seneca processing complex− Condensate delivered to centralized stabilization and
truck loading facilities• Significant growth projected over the next twelve months
as set out below:
• Antero plans to operate an average of two drilling rigs in the Utica Shale during 2016, including intermediate rigs
− 100% of rigs targeting the highly-rich gas/condensate and highly-rich gas regimes
• All 30 gross wells targeted to be completed in 2016 are on Antero Midstream’s footprint
• Antero will defer an additional 8 completions in order to limit natural gas volumes sold into unfavorable pricing markets
Utica Gathering & Compression
Note: Antero acreage position reflects tax districts in which greater than 3,000 net acres are owned.
ANTERO MIDSTREAM ASSETS – RICH & DRY GAS UTICA
YE 2015 YE 2016E
Low Pressure Gathering Pipelines (Miles)
55 56
High Pressure Gathering Pipelines (Miles)
36 36
Condensate Pipelines (Miles) 19 19
Compression Capacity (MMcf/d) 120 120
ANTERO MIDSTREAM WATER BUSINESS OVERVIEW
36Note: Antero acreage position reflects tax districts in which greater than 3,000 net acres are owned.1. Represents inception to date actuals as of 12/31/2015 and 2016 guidance.2. All Antero water withdrawal sites are fully permitted under long-term state regulatory permits both in WV and OH. 3. Includes both expansion capital and maintenance capital. 4. Marcellus assumes fee of $3.69 per barrel subject to annual inflation and 351,000 barrels of water per well that utilize the fresh water delivery system based on 9,000 foot lateral. Operating margin excludes
G&A. Utica assumes fee of $3.64 per barrel subject to annual inflation and 306,000 barrels of water per well that utilize the fresh water delivery system based on 9,000 foot lateral. Operating margin excludes G&A.
AM acquired AR’s integrated water business for $1.05 billion plus earn out payments of $125 million at year-end in each of 2019 and 2020− The acquired business includes Antero’s Marcellus and Utica freshwater delivery business, the fully-contracted future advanced wastewater
treatment complex and all fluid handling and disposal services for Antero
Projected Water Business Infrastructure(1)
Marcellus Shale
Utica Shale Total
YE 2015 Cumulative Fresh WaterDelivery Capex ($MM) $469 $62 $531
Water Pipelines(Miles) 184 75 259
Fresh Water StorageImpoundments 22 13 35
2016E Fresh Water Delivery Capex Budget ($MM)(3) $40 $10 $50
Water Pipelines(Miles) 20 9 29
Fresh Water StorageImpoundments 1 - 1
Cash Operating Margin per Well(4)
$950k -$1,000k
$825k -$875k
2016E Advanced Waste Water Treatment Budget ($MM) $130
2016E Total Water Business Budget ($MM) $180
Water Business Assets
• Fresh water delivery assets provide fresh water to support Marcellus and Utica well completions– Year-round water supply sources: Clearwater Facility, Ohio
River, local rivers & reservoirs(2)
– 100% fixed fee long term contracts
Antero Clearwater advanced wastewater treatment facility currently under construction – connects to
Antero freshwater delivery system
Acquisition Acreage
010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,00080,000
Antero Clearwater Advanced Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Bbl/d)
Produced/Flowback Volumes (Bbl/d)
Illustrative Produced & Flowback Water VolumesAdvanced Wastewater Treatment
Antero Produced Water Services and Freshwater Delivery Business
Antero AdvancedWastewater Treatment
3rd Party Recyclingand Well Disposal
(Bbl/d)
Advanced Wastewater Treatment ComplexEstimated capital expenditures ($ million)(1) ~$275Standalone EBITDA at 100% utilization(2) ~$55 – $65Implied investment to standalone EBITDA build-out multiple ~4x – 5xEstimated per well savings to Antero Resources ~$150,000Estimated in-service date Late 2017Operating capacity (Bbl/d) 60,000Operating agreement
• Antero has contracted with Veolia to integrate an advanced wastewater treatment complex into its water business
• Veolia will build and operate, and Antero will own largest advanced wastewater treatment complex in Appalachia− Will treat and recycle AR produced and flowback water− Creates additional year-round water source for completions− Will have capacity for third party business over first two years
1. Includes capital to construct pipeline to connect facility to freshwater delivery system. Includes $10 million that AR agreed to fund in the drop down transaction. 2. Standalone EBITDA projection assumes inter-company fixed fee for recycling of $4.00 per barrel and 60,000 barrels per day of capacity. Does not include potential sales of marketable byproducts.
20 Years, Extendable
37Integrated Water Business
Antero Advanced Wastewater Treatment
Freshwater delivery system
Flowback and produced
Water
Well Pad
Well Pad
CompletionOperations
Producing
Freshwater
Salt
Calcium Chloride
Marketable byproduct
Marketable byproduct used in oil and gas operations
Freshwater delivery system
ANTERO MIDSTREAM ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT ASSET OVERVIEW
AM UPSIDE OPPORTUNITY SET
38
ACTIVITY CURRENTLY DEDICATED TO AM
Third Party Business
Processing, Fractionation, Transportation and Marketing
• Opportunity to expand fresh water, waste water and gathering/compression services to third parties in Marcellus and Utica to enhance asset utilization
• AR must request a bid from AM and can only reject if third party service fees are lower. AM has right to match lower fee offer.
WV/PA Utica Dry Gas• 278,000 gross acres of AR Utica dry gas acreage underlying
the Marcellus in West Virginia and Pennsylvania dedicated to AM
• AR has drilled and completed its first WV Utica well
AR Acreage Consolidation• 66,500 net acre acquisition announced by AR substantially
undedicated for gathering, compression, processing and water services
• Future acreage acquisitions by AR are dedicated to AM
PROCESSING – VALUE CHAIN POTENTIALFOR UNDEDICATED ACREAGE
SherwoodProcessing
Complex
Processing Area Of Dedication for AM
MarkWest Processing AOD – 192,000 Gross
Acres
Tyler County94,000 Gross Acres
Ritchie County53,000 Gross Acres
Gilmer County14,000 Gross Acres
Wetzel County57,000 Gross Acres
Pleasants County7,000 Gross Acres
AR Gross Processble Acres (1)
AR C3+ 3P Reserves
(MMBbls)(2)
AR 3P Gross Wellhead Gas (Tcf)
Total 225,000 1,022 21.4
39
Antero Resources has over 21 Tcf of processable gross 3P gas reserves and 1.0 billion Bbls of gross 3P NGL reserves across 225,000 gross processable Marcellus acres that are dedicated to Antero Midstream for processing
1. Gross Processable Acres defined as acres with expected Btu greater than 1,1002. Antero gross 3P C3+ NGL volumes and 3P Gross Wellhead Gas reserves as of 12/31/2015, pro forma for AR announced acreage acquisition. Gross acres as of 6/30/2016.
LARGE UTICA SHALE DRY GAS POSITION
40
Antero has completed its first dry gas Utica well – a 6,620’ lateral in Tyler County, WV
Antero has 285,000 net acres of exposure to Utica dry gas play in OH, WV and PA pro forma
Other operators have reported strong Utica Shale dry gas results including the following wells:
Well Operator24-hr IP(MMcf/d)
LateralLength
(Ft)
24-hr IP/1,000’Lateral
(MMcf/d)
Scotts Run EQT 72.9 3,221 22.633
Gaut GH9 CNX 61.9 6,141 11.131
Claysville Sportsman
RRC 59.0 5,420 10.886
Stewart-Winland MHR 46.5 5,289 8.792
Bigfoot 9H RICE 41.7 6,957 5.994
Blake U-7H GST 36.8 6,617 5.561
Stalder #3UH MHR 32.5 5,050 6.436
Big 190 EQT 31.3 6,335 4.941
Irons #1-4H GPOR 30.3 5,714 5.303
Pribble 6HU SGY 30.0 3,605 8.322
Simms U-5H GST 29.4 4,447 6.611
Conner 6H CVX 25.0 6,451 3.875
Messenger 3H SWN 25.0 5,889 4.245
Tippens #6H ECR 23.2 5,858 3.960
Porterfield 1H-17 HESS 17.2 5,000 3.440
1. Antero acreage position reflects tax districts in which greater than 3,000 net acres are held in OH, WV and PA.2. The Rymer 4HD has been flowing into the sales line for 90 days with an average choke-restricted flow rate of 20 MMcf/d.
RRC – Claysville Sportsman5,420’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 59.0 MMcf/d
EQT – Scotts Run3,221’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 72.9 MMcf/d
CNX – GH96,141’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 61.9 MMcf/d
EQT – Big 1906,335’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 31.3 MMcf/d
MHR – Stewart Winland5,289’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 46.5 MMcf/d
SGY – Pribble3,605’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 30.0 MMcf/d
Tughill – Blake6,617’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 36.8 MMcf/d
Tughill – Simms4,447’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 29.4 MMcf/d
Antero – Rymer 4HD6,620’ Lateral
90-day IP: 20 MMcf/d
SWN – Messenger 5,889’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 25.0 MMcf/d
ECR – Tippens5,858’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 23.2 MMcf/d
MHR – Stalder5,050’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 32.5 MMcf/d
CVX – Conner6,451’ Lateral
24-hr IP: 25.0 MMcf/d
Low Cost Marcellus/Utica Focus
“Best-in-Class” Distribution Growth
41
CATALYSTS
• 30% for 2016 and 28% to 30% for 2017 targeted based on Sponsor planned development; additional third party business expansion opportunities
• AM Sponsor is the most active operator in Appalachia; • 17% production growth guidance for 2016 supported by $1.4 billion
capital budget, firm processing and takeaway, long-term natural gas hedges and $3.2 billion of liquidity
• Targeting 20% to 25% production growth in 2017
• Sponsor operations target two of the lowest cost shale plays in North America
• Attractive well economics support continued drilling at current prices
• $3.2 billion of capital investment opportunities over the next five years, pro forma for the AR acreage acquisition
Appalachian Basin Midstream Growth
High Growth Sponsor Production Profile
1
2
3
4
5
6
• Acquisition of integrated water business from AR expected to result in distributable cash flow per unit accretion in 2016
Consolidation and Stacked Pay
Upside
• AR plans to continue to consolidate Marcellus/Utica acreage• Development of Utica Shale Dry Gas resource will provide further
midstream infrastructure expansion opportunities
Integrated WaterBusiness Drop Down
APPENDIX
42
Key VariableOriginal
2016 GuidanceUpdated
2016 Guidance
Financial:
Net Income ($MM) N/A $165 - $190
Adjusted EBITDA ($MM) $300 - $325 $325 - $350
Distributable Cash Flow ($MM) $250 - $275 $275 - $300
Year-over-Year Distribution Growth 28% - 30% 30%
Operating:
Low Pressure Pipeline Added (Miles) 9 9
High Pressure Pipeline Added (Miles) 22 22
Compression Capacity Added (MMcf/d) 240 240
Fresh Water Pipeline Added (Miles) 30 30
Capital Expenditures ($MM):
Gathering and Compression Infrastructure $240 $240
Fresh Water Infrastructure $40 $40
Advanced Wastewater Treatment $130 $130
Stonewall Gathering Pipeline Option(1) NA $45
Maintenance Capital $25 $25
Total Capital Expenditures ($MM) $435 $480
ANTERO MIDSTREAM – UPDATED 2016 GUIDANCE
Key Operating & Financial Assumptions
431. Antero Midstream closed on the acquisition of 15% interest in the Stonewall pipeline on 5/26/2016.
2016 UPDATED CAPITAL BUDGET
By Area
44
$423 Million – 2015(1)
By Segment ($MM)
$349
$6
$55$13
Gathering & Compression Fresh Water InfrastructureAdvanced Wastewater Treatment Maintenance Capital
74%
26%
Marcellus Utica
By Area
$480 Million – 2016By Segment ($MM)
Antero Midstream’s 2016 updated capital budget is $480 million, a 13% increase from 2015 capital expenditures of $423 million
13%
130 Completions
1. Excludes $1.05 billion water drop down in September 2015. Water capex values only from 4Q 2015.
$240
$40
$130
$45$25
Gathering & Compression Fresh Water InfrastructureAdvanced Wastewater Treatment Stonewall PipelineMaintenance Capital
95%
5%
Marcellus Utica
ANTERO RESOURCES – UPDATED 2016 GUIDANCE
Key Variable 2016 Guidance(1)
Net Daily Production (MMcfe/d) 1,750
Net Residue Natural Gas Production (MMcf/d) 1,355
Net C3+ NGL Production (Bbl/d) 52,500
Net Ethane Production (Bbl/d) 10,000
Net Oil Production (Bbl/d) 3,500
Net Liquids Production (Bbl/d) 66,000
Natural Gas Realized Price Premium to NYMEX Henry Hub Before Hedging ($/Mcf)(2)(3) +$0.00 to $0.10
Oil Realized Price Differential to NYMEX WTI Oil Before Hedging ($/Bbl) $(10.00) - $(11.00)
C3+ NGL Realized Price (% of NYMEX WTI)(2) 35% - 40%
Ethane Realized Price (Differential to Mont Belvieu) ($/Gal) $0.00
Operating:Cash Production Expense ($/Mcfe)(4) $1.50 - $1.60
Marketing Expense, Net of Marketing Revenue ($/Mcfe) $0.15 - $0.20
G&A Expense ($/Mcfe) $0.20 - $0.25
Operated Wells Completed 110
Drilled Uncompleted Wells 70
Average Operated Drilling Rigs ≈ 7
Capital Expenditures ($MM):Drilling & Completion $1,300
Land $100
Total Capital Expenditures ($MM) $1,4001. Updated guidance per press release dated 4/27/2016. 2. Based on current strip pricing as of December 31, 2015. 3. Includes Btu upgrade as Antero’s processed tailgate and unprocessed dry gas production is greater than 1000 Btu on average. 4. Includes lease operating expenses, gathering, compression and transportation expenses and production taxes.
Key Operating & Financial Assumptions
45
Antero Long Term Firm Processing & Takeaway Position (YE 2018) – Accessing Favorable MarketsMariner East 2
62 MBbl/d CommitmentMarcus Hook Export
Shell30 MBbl/d Commitment
Beaver County Cracker (2)
Sabine Pass (Trains 1-4)50 MMcf/d per Train
(T1 and T2 in-service)
Lake Charles LNG(3)
150 MMcf/d
Freeport LNG70 MMcf/d
1. August 2016 and full year 2017 futures basis, respectively, provided by Intercontinental Exchange dated 6/30/2016. Favorable markets shaded in green. 2. Shell announced final investment decision (FID) on 6/7/2016.3. Lake Charles LNG 150 MMcf/d commitment subject to BG FID expected in 2016.
Chicago(1)
$(0.06) / $0.00
CGTLA(1)
$(0.08) / $(0.08)
TCO(1)
$(0.14) / $(0.22)
46
Cove Point LNG4.85 Bcf/dFirm GasTakeaway
By YE 2018
Antero’s natural gas firm transportation (FT) portfolio builds to 4.85 Bcf/d by YE 2018 with 87% serving favorable markets, with an average demand fee of $0.46/MMBtu and positive weighted average basis differential to NYMEX after assumed Btu uplift for gas
YE 2018 Gas Market MixAntero 4.85 Bcf/d FT
44%Gulf Coast
17%Midwest
13%Atlantic
Seaboard
13%Dom S/TETCO
(PA)
13%TCO
Positive weighted
average basis differential
Antero Commitments
(3)
(2)
Dom South(1)
$(1.04) / $(0.82)
LARGEST FIRM TRANSPORTATION AND PROCESSINGPORTFOLIO IN APPALACHIA
NORTHEAST NGL GROWTH IS SUPPORTED BY INCREASING TAKEAWAY OPTIONS
1. Chart 10 per BAML research dated 6/5/2015. Pipeline volumes are capacity estimates.
Industry NGL Pipelines – Actual and Projected(1)
47
ShellBeaver County Cracker
(Received FID June 2016)
Mariner East 262 MBbl/d Commitment
Marcus Hook Export
Gulf Coast Critical to
NGL Pricing
Appalachia
NGL transportation rates are expected to decline $0.12 to $0.15 per gallon in 2017 as pipeline options to domestic markets and export terminals go in-service (Mariner East)
(MMBbl/d)
Mariner West50 MBbl/d C2
POSITIVE OUTLOOK FOR LONG-TERM NGL MARKETS
Steady Global LPG Demand Growth Through 2035(1)
1. Source: PIRA NGL Study, September 2015.2. Source: IHS, Waterborne, SK Gas Analysis; Wood Mackenzie; Wood Mackenzie; PDH C3 capacity based on 25 MBbl/d = 650 Mt/y.
Multiple Factors Driving Global LPG Demand Growth Through 2020(2)
MM
Bbl
/d
0.0
0.33
0.67
Forecast global LPG demand growth of 800 MBbl/d to 1 MMBbl/d by 2020 to be driven by petrochem projects in Asia and Middle East as well as residential/commercial, alkylate and power generation demand− Naphtha cracker conversion to LPG another potential demand driver that has not yet been factored into analyst estimates ≈1 MMBbl/d
China KoreaHaiwei (2016) - 21 MBbl/d C3
SK Advanced (2016) - 27 MBbl/d C3
Ningbo Fuji (2016) - 29 MBbl/d C3
Fujian Meide (2016) - 29 MBbl/d C3
Tianjin Bohua 2 (2018) - 29 MBbl/d C3 United States
Fujian Meide 2 (2018) - 29 MBbl/d C3
Enterprise (3Q 2016)- 29 MBbl/d C3
Oriental Tangshan (2019) - 25 MBbl/d C3
Formosa (2017)- 25 MBbl/d C3
Firm and Likely PDH Underway (By 2020)
Total - 243 MBbl/d C3
Million Tons, Global PDH Capacity
1990 2000 2010 2020
20
10
0
48
14.7
13.0
11.4
9.8
8.2
6.5
4.9
3.3
1.7
U.S. Driven Global LPG Supply Through 2035(1)
MMBbl/d MMBbl/d1.3
1.0
0.7
0.3
-0.3
GLOBAL LPG DEMAND DRIVEN BYPETCHEM AND RES/COMMLargest end-use sectors for LPG are residential/commercial, which tends to grow with population and improvement in
living standards in the emerging markets− PIRA forecasting >1.0 MMBbl/d over next 5 years and >4.5 MMBbl/d of global LPG demand growth over next 20 years
491. PIRA NGL Study, September 2015.
MMBbl/d14.7
13.0
11.4
9.8
8.2
6.5
4.9
3.3
1.6
GLOBAL LPG TRADE DRIVEN BY U.S. SHALEThe U.S. is the largest single driver of the rapid expansion in LPG trade accounting for over 90% in trade growth
501. PIRA NGL Study, September 2015.
MMBbl/d5.2
4.6
3.9
3.3
2.6
2.0
1.3
0.7
United States
U.S. SHALE NGL EURS SUPPORT LPG TRADE GROWTH
511. PIRA NGL Study, September 2015.
• U.S. shale play NGL reserves are 50.8 billion barrels
• Eagle Ford, Marcellus, Utica, Bakken and Permian are the work horses of U.S. shale production growth
• Marcellus/Utica NGL resource estimate by PIRA is 9.7 billion barrels, in line with Antero estimate of ≈ 11.1 billion barrels
• The growth curve of each basin will ultimately be a function of downstream solutions and investment
(1)
(1)(1)
POSITIVE OUTLOOK FOR LONG-TERM ETHANE MARKETS AS WELL
U.S. Ethane Supply/Demand Balance Through 2020(1)
1. Source: Bentek, August 2015.2. Source: Citi research dated 7/15/2015.
U.S. Ethane Exports Through 2020(2)
U.S. ethane demand is projected to increase at an annual 3.5% CAGR through 2020, primarily based on an ≈8% CAGR for U.S. petrochemdemand and a 30% growth in exports primarily to Europe− The growth in shipping exports in 2016 and 2017 is driven by Enterprise Products’ 200 MBbl/d export facility on the Gulf Coast
-
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
MM
Bb/
d
Petchem Exports Rejection Total Supply (Net Stock Change)
U.S. Seaborne Ethane Exports Through 2020(2)
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
MB
bl/d
Ship Pipeline
250
200
150
100
50
MB
bl/d
U.S. exports increase significantly into 2016
and 2017 as EPD’s Morgan Point Facility
comes in-service
U.S. Ethane Rejection by Region Through 2020(1)
Access to both Marcus Hook and the Gulf Coast is
critical to optimizing ethane
netbacks
Rejection declines significantly into 2018
Unlike LPG, 80% of ethane will be
consumed in the U.S.
Petrochem demand increases at ≈8% CAGR through 2020
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
MB
bl/d
Williston PADD 4 PADD 1 (East Coast) PADD 2 PADD 3
No Northeast rejection after 2017
52
Northeast Ethane
Rejection
Exports
U.S. PetChem
LTM ProductionNTM Production ForecastAverage LTM Production
MAINTENANCE CAPITAL METHODOLOGY• Maintenance Capital Calculation Methodology – Low Pressure Gathering
– Estimate the number of new well connections needed during the forecast period in order to offset the natural production decline and maintain the average throughput volume on our system over the LTM period
– (1) Compare this number of well connections to the total number of well connections estimated to be made during such period, and
– (2) Designate an equal percentage of our estimated low pressure gathering capital expenditures as maintenance capital expenditures
Maintenance capital expenditures are cash expenditures (including expenditures for the construction or development of new capital assets or the replacement, improvement or expansion of existing capital assets) made to maintain, over the long term, our operating capacity or revenue
• Illustrative Example
LTM Forecast Period
Decline of LTM average throughput to be replaced with production volume
from new well connections
53
• Maintenance Capital Calculation Methodology – Fresh Water Distribution− Estimate the number of wells to which we would need to distribute fresh water during the forecast period in order to maintain
the average fresh water throughput volume on our system over the LTM period− (1) Compare this number of wells to the total number of new wells to which we expect to distribute fresh water during such
period, and− (2) Designate an equal percentage of our estimated water line capital expenditures as maintenance capital expenditures
ANTERO RESOURCES EBITDAX RECONCILIATION
54
EBITDAX Reconciliation
($ in millions) Quarter Ended LTM Ended6/30/2016 6/30/2016
EBITDAX:Net income including noncontrolling interest $(575.5) $155.5Commodity derivative fair value (gains) 684.6 (1,219.5)Net cash receipts on settled derivatives instruments 292.5 1,092.7Interest expense 62.6 247.2Income tax expense (benefit) (376.5) 41.0Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion 198.0 741.4Impairment of unproved properties 19.9 104.9Exploration expense 1.1 4.0Equity-based compensation expense 25.8 91.8Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate (0.5) (0.5)Contract termination and rig stacking 0.0 27.6Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAX $332.1 $1,286.1
ANTERO MIDSTREAM EBITDA RECONCILIATION
55
EBITDA and DCF Reconciliation
$ in thousandsSix months ended
June 30,2015 2016
Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable Cash Flow: Net income $67,451 $92,829
Interest expense 3,222 7,582Depreciation expense 41,955 47,963Accretion of contingent acquisition consideration - 6,857Equity-based compensation 12,376 12,766Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliate - (484)
Adjusted EBITDA $125,004 $167,513
Pre-Water Acquisition net income attributed to parent (32,353) -
Pre-Water Acquisition depreciation expense attributed to parent (12,282) -
Pre-Water Acquisition equity-based compensation expense attributed to parent (2,365) -
Pre-Water Acquisition interest expense attributed to parent (1,556) -
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to the Partnership 76,448 167,513
Cash interest paid - attributable to Partnership (1,177) (7,708)Cash reserved for payment of income tax witholding upon vesting of Antero Midstream LP equity-basedcompensation awards - (2,000)
Cash to be received from unconsolidated affiliate - 778Maintenance capital expenditures attributable to Partnership (5,787) (11,518)
Distributable Cash Flow $69,484 $147,065
CAUTIONARY NOTE
The SEC permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved, probable and possible reserve estimates (collectively, “3P”). Antero has provided internally generated estimates for proved, probable and possible reserves in this presentation in accordance with SEC guidelines and definitions, which have been audited by Antero’s third-party engineers. Unless otherwise noted, reserve estimates as of December 31, 2015 assume ethane rejection and strip pricing.
Actual quantities that may be ultimately recovered from Antero’s interests may differ substantially from the estimates in this presentation. Factors affecting ultimate recovery include the scope of Antero’s ongoing drilling program, which will be directly affected by commodity prices, the availability of capital, drilling and production costs, availability of drilling services and equipment, drilling results, lease expirations, transportation constraints, regulatory approvals and other factors, and actual drilling results, including geological and mechanical factors affecting recovery rates.
In this presentation:
• “3P reserves” refer to Antero’s estimated aggregate proved, probable and possible reserves as of December 31, 2015. The SEC prohibits companies from aggregating proved, probable and possible reserves in filings with the SEC due to the different levels of certainty associated with each reserve category.
• “EUR,” or “Estimated Ultimate Recovery,” refers to Antero’s internal estimates of per well hydrocarbon quantities that may bepotentially recovered from a hypothetical future well completed as a producer in the area. These quantities do not necessarily constitute or represent reserves within the meaning of the Society of Petroleum Engineer’s Petroleum Resource Management System or the SEC’s oil and natural gas disclosure rules.
• “Condensate” refers to gas having a heat content between 1250 BTU and 1300 BTU in the Utica Shale.
• “Highly-rich gas/condensate” refers to gas having a heat content between 1275 BTU and 1350 BTU in the Marcellus Shale and 1225 BTU and 1250 BTU in the Utica Shale.
• “Highly-rich gas” refers to gas having a heat content between 1200 BTU and 1275 BTU in the Marcellus Shale and 1200 BTU and 1225 BTU in the Utica Shale.
• “Rich gas” refers to gas having a heat content of between 1100 BTU and 1200 BTU.
• “Dry gas” refers to gas containing insufficient quantities of hydrocarbons heavier than methane to allow their commercial extraction or to require their removal in order to render the gas suitable for fuel use.
Regarding Hydrocarbon Quantities
56