Transcript
Page 1: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Passive House in California:Overkill or Appropriate?

Bronwyn Barry, Assoc.AIA

Certified Passive House ConsultantDirector, One Sky Homes

COPYRIGHT ONE SKY HOMES 2013

Page 2: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Agenda:T-24 Comparisons

Assemblies that workWhat really matters?

Glazing over the details

Page 3: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Nominal vs Actual

24’-0” wall = 288” (100%)2x6 @ 16” o.c. (18) = 27” ( 10%)Batt Insulation = 261” ( 90%)

  Nominal Actual

  R-Value/inch Whole Wall 85/15% 75/25%Studs 1.3 7.0 1.1 1.8Batts 3.5 19.3 16.4 14.4Total Wall     17.4 16.2

Page 4: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The Sunnyvale Retrofit

Windows Walls Roof Floor Total0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Typical T-24 Project R-value (hr.ft2F/BTU.in)

PH Project R-value (hr.ft2F/BTU.in)

Windows: AlpenWalls: 2x4, cellulose w/ 2” PolyisoRoof: 6” PolyisoFloor: 4” Polyiso

Page 5: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Sunnyvale Retrofit Assembly Details

FOUNDATION & BARGE RAFTER

ROOF: R-40

WALLS: R- 23

WINDOWS: R-5

FLOOR: R-40

COPYRIGHT ONE SKY HOMES 2013

Page 6: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The SIPS New Build

Windows Walls Roof Floor Total0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Typical T-24 Project R-value (hr.ft2°F/BTU.in)

PH Project R-value (hr.ft2°F/BTU.in)

Windows: EnerSignWalls: 8” SIPSRoof: 10” SIPSFloor: Slab with 2”EPS

Page 7: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Stick Frame Net Zero

Windows Walls Roof Floor Total0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Typical T-24 Project R-value (hr.ft2F/BTU.in)

PH Project R-value (hr.ft2F/BTU.in)

Windows: Alpen + SorpetalerWalls: 2x6, cellulose w/ 1” EPSRoof: 13” Truss, CelluloseFloor: Slab, 4” EPS

Page 8: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Cottle ZEH - Assembly Details

Foundation - R-23 ICF Stem Wall R-15 Slab Floor

Walls – R23

Ceiling - R-50 Loose-fill Cellulose

Page 9: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

1. Super-Insulate2. Avoid Thermal Bridges3. Air Seal ( tight! )4. Windows/Doors – high-performance5. Heat Recovery Ventilation (HRV) in most

Climates6. Solar aware design7. Use PHPP

Passive House Recipe" Buildings heated with hair dryers"

Page 10: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Envelope Results kBTU/ft2.yr heating energy

Preliminary Aug 3, 2009 Max. allowed = 4.75 kBTU/ft2.yr

SIP wall system** Prefab Stud wall Site built

5.5" 7.25" 5.5"5.5" w/ rigid

insul. 7.25"7.25" w/

rigid insul.9.5" TJI studs

Window Est. Cost ($K) 49 52 47 53 49 55 79

Sierra Pacific* 4.52 4.01 5.11 4.58 4.54 4.19 3.91

37 86 89 84 90 86 92 116

**assuming $4k for interior furring

using Recoup 200DX HRV w/ 3' OA duct runs

4" EPS under slab

11-7/8" TJI roof

4" EPS slab edge

Challenging walls

Source: Performance analysis from Dan Johnson, Arkin Tilt Architects and cost estimates from Quantum Builders

A dozen ways to build a wall

Page 11: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Floor to floor assembly with open web hanging floor truss

Complicated junctionsHundreds of ways to mess them up!

Page 12: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Which details really matter?

Air-sealing?Insulation?

Ventilation?Thermal Bridges?

orWindows?

SILL & JAMB (CASEMENT)

Page 13: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The Sunnyvale Losses

Exterior Walls21%

Roof17%

Floors21%

Windows30%

Exterior Door2%

Ventilation9%

Total Heat Losses = 15,170 kBTU/yr

Windows: AlpenWalls: 2x4, cellulose w/ 2” PolyisoRoof: 6” PolyisoFloor: 4” Polyiso

Page 14: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The Sunnyvale Gains

Windows: AlpenWalls: 2x4, cellulose w/ 2” PolyisoRoof: 6” PolyisoFloor: 4” Polyiso

Windows (So-lar gains)

50%

Internal Heat Gains50%

Total Heat Gains = 7,748 kBTU/yr

Losses66%

Gains34%

Annual Heat Demand = 7,556 kBTU/yr

= 4.85 kBTU/sf.yr

Page 15: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The Cottle Losses

Exterior Walls31%

Roof9%

Floors12%

Fndn Stem wall1%

Attached Garage7%

Windows26%

Ventilation13%

Total Heat Losses = 28,986 kBTU/yr

Windows: Alpen + SorpetalerWalls: 2x6, cellulose w/ 1” EPSRoof: 13” Truss, CelluloseFloor: Slab, 4” EPS

Page 16: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The Cottle Gains

Windows: Alpen + SorpetalerWalls: 2x6, cellulose w/ 1” EPSRoof: 13” Truss, CelluloseFloor: Slab, 4” EPS

Total Heat Gains = 19,853 kBTU/yr

Windows (Solar gains)

Internal Heat Gains

Losses59%

Gains41%

Annual Heat Demand = 9,133 kBTU/yr

= 3.67 kBTU/sf.yr

Page 17: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Image: Lorna Fear IR images

The Camera Never Lies!

Page 18: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Upcoming

Wednesday, March 20th

Pacific Energy CenterSan Francisco

www.co2zeroca.org

Page 19: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

More from Mark….

Questions?

Thank YouBronwyn Barry

Resources:

www.passivehousecal.orgwww.aphnetwork.orgwww.passivehouse.com


Top Related