![Page 1: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT
Andreas SynetosFirst Department of Cardiology
University of Athens
![Page 2: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Limitations of Angio
![Page 3: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Plaque rupture impact
76% of sudden deaths were attributable to plaque rupture, and only 24%
of MIs were associated with severe luminal narrowing.
Falk E, …,Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 1995;92:657– 671
![Page 4: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Balance Research/Clinical
![Page 5: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Intravascular Imaging: From sound to light
IVUS was the gold standard for
evaluation of lumen dimensions and
plaque morphology
OCT has provided us with another
useful tool with far superior
resolution (10x), but limited
penetration (<2mm)
![Page 6: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Technical characteristics
Prati et al, EHJ 2009
![Page 7: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Η ποιόηηηα ηηρ εικόναρ εξαπηάηαι από:
- αναλςηική ικανόηηηα ζηο σώπο (spatial resolution)(ακτινική και πλάγια αναλστική ικανότητα)
- ικανόηηηα διάκπιζηρ ιζηών (contrast resolution) (αποτρώσεις τοσ γκρι / dynamic range)
7
Απεικόνιςη Βαςικζσ αρχζσ
![Page 8: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Αναλςηική ικανόηηηα ζηο σώπο (spatial
resolution) = η ικανόηηηα διάκπιζηρ
ανάμεζα ζε 2 διαθοπεηικά ζημεία ηηρ
εικόναρ
Δξαπηάηαι από ηη ζςσνόηηηα (MHz)
Για ησοβολέα IVUS 30-40MHz, η ακηινική
ικανόηηηα ανάλςζηρ είναι 80-100 μm,
ενώ η πλάγια είναι 200-250 μm.
- Χαμηλή ζςσνόηηηα (λίγα MHz) → βαθύηεπη
διείζδςζη ηηρ εικόναρ
- Υτηλή ζςσνόηηηα (πολλά MHz) →καλύηεπη ποιόηηηα εικόναρ (ανάλςζη)
20 MHz
40 MHz
Απεικόνιζη Βαζικέρ απσέρ
![Page 9: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Απεικόνιςη με IVUSΒαςικζσ αρχζσ
![Page 10: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Αξιολόγηζη ζημανηικόηηηαρ
βλάβηρ
Καθοδήγηζη ηηρ
αγγειοπλαζηικήρ
(ππιν από ηο stent)
Δκηίμηζη ηος αποηελέζμαηορ
ηηρ αγγειοπλαζηική
ρ
Αξιολόγηζη επιπλοκών μεηά από ηο
stent
Θπόμβυζη &
επαναζηένυζη ηος stent
Σύγκπιζη μεθόδυν
Δκηίμηζη ζύζηαζηρ
πλάκαρ
![Page 11: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Ολική απηηπιακή επιθάνεια (Total arterial CSA)
Δπιθάνεια αςλού (Lumen CSA)
Μέγιζηη & ελάσιζηη διάμεηπορ αςλού
% Σηένυζη επιθάνειαρ αςλού
Μήκορ βλάβηρ
Δπιθάνεια πλάκαρ & μέζος σιηώνα
= Ολική απηηπιακή επιθάνεια - Δπιθάνεια αςλού (ζε βλάβη συπίρ stent)
= Ολική απηηπιακή επιθάνεια - Δπιθάνεια stent(ζε βλάβη με stent)
Γείκηηρ αναδιαμόπθυζηρ (remodeling index):= Δπιθάνεια αςλού (ζε βλάβη) / Δπιθάνεια αςλού (ζε ςγιέρ ημήμα)
Σε stent: επιθάνεια stent, μέγιζηη & ελάσιζηη διάμεηπορ
stent
Δπιθάνεια ςπεππλαζίαρ έζυ σιηώνα = Δπιθάνεια stent -
Δπιθάνεια αςλού
IVUS: μεηπήζειρ
![Page 12: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Σηένωζη επιθανείαρ αςλού (%)= [(Επιθάνεια αςλού ζε
ζημείο αναθοπάρ – Ελάσιζηη επιθάνεια αςλού) /
(Επιθάνεια αςλού ζε ζημείο αναθοπάρ)] x100
% Σηένυζη επιθάνειαρ αςλού
(διαθέπει από ηην % θοπηίο πλάκαρ)
![Page 13: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
IVUS values that predict FFR<0.75
LM
![Page 15: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
IVUS: Οπιζμόρ «ζημανηικήρ»
ζηένυζηρ
% ελάττωςη διαμζτρου > 70%
% ελάττωςη επιφανείασ > 50%
MLA < 4 mm2 (εγγφσ LAD, LCX, RCA)
< 6 mm2 (ςτζλεχοσ)
Ελάχιςτη διάμετροσ < 1.8 mm (εγγφσ LAD, LCX, RCA)
< 2.9 mm (ςτζλεχοσ)
![Page 16: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Αξιολόγηζη
ζημανηικόηηηαρ
βλάβηρΚαθοδήγηζη ηηρ αγγειοπλαζηικήρ
(ππιν από ηο stent)
Δκηίμηζη ηος αποηελέζμαηορ
ηηρ αγγειοπλαζηικήρ
Αξιολόγηζη επιπλοκών μεηά από ηο
stent
Θπόμβυζη &
επαναζηένυζη ηος stent
Σύγκπιζη μεθόδυν
Δκηίμηζη ζύζηαζηρ
πλάκαρ
Cost effectiveness
![Page 17: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
0
2
4
6
8
Minimum stent CSA (mm2)
Thrombosis
Control
p= 0,02
Fugii, K, et al, J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Apr 5;45(7):995-8
0
20
40
60
80
100
Stent expansion
(%)
Thrombosis
Control
p= 0,03
Stent under-expansion and residual reference segment stenosis
are associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis after
successful drug-eluting stent implantation.
![Page 18: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Effect of incomplete apposition : very late thrombosis
Cook S et al, Circulation 2007;115:2426-34
Incomplete stent apposition is highly prevalent in patients with
very late stent thrombosis after DES
implantation, suggesting a role in the pathogenesis of this
adverse event.
![Page 19: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
IVUS vs Angio guided PCI
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 00:00–00 (2013)
![Page 21: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
A benefit of IVUS optimized DES implantation was observed in complex lesions in the post-procedure minimal lumen diameter. No statistically significant
difference was found in MACE up to 24 months.Chieffo et al .Am Heart J 2013;165:65-72
AVIO
![Page 22: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Wakxman et al JACC Vol. 62, No. 17, 2013
![Page 23: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
1991 2002
Intracoronary Imaging
2004
Imaging Wire 0.019""Occlusive Method"
Regar et al. Eur Heart J 2004 (Abstract)
Regar E, van Leeuwen AMGJ, Serruys PW (Eds): Optical coherence tomography in cardiovascular research. London: Informa Healthcare. 2007.
OCT
![Page 24: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
1991 2002
Intracoronary Imaging
2004 2007 2008
2nd
Generation OCT
Fourier Domain OCT(OFDI/Frequency/Spectral Domain/Swept Source)
Monorail Imaging CatheterNon-Occlusive
OCT
![Page 25: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique
Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009
![Page 26: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
OCT vs OFDI
Takarada et al, CCI 2009
![Page 27: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Ανάλυςη εικόνων OCT
• Ενταςη ςήματοσ (intensity)
• Απόςβεςη ςήματοσ (attenuation)
• Ορια ιςτου
![Page 28: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Intimal thickening
1st Department of Cardiology. University of Athens
![Page 29: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Lipid Pool
Yabushita et al, Circulation. 2002;106:1640-1645
High attenuation
Lipid pool
Sensitivity: 90-95% Specifity: 90-98%Kawasaki et al., JACC 2006;48:81-88
n=357 segments
1st Department of Cardiology. University of Athens
![Page 30: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Calcific depositions
Yabushita et al, Circulation. 2002;106:1640-1645
Low attenuation
Sensitivity: 95-100%, Specificity: 97-100%Kawasaki et al., JACC 48;2006:81-88
n=357 segments
1st Department of Cardiology. University of Athens
![Page 31: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Rupture
1st Department of Cardiology. University of Athens
![Page 32: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
ThrombusBased on the intensity attenuation
Kume et al, Am J Cardiol 2006;97:1713–1717
Lig
ht
Inte
nsi
ty
White Thrombus
Lig
ht
Inte
nsi
ty
Red Thrombus
Sensitivity: 90%
Specifity: 92%
for identifying the
type of thrombus
(Cut-off value 250
μm)
n=108 segments
16 red thrombi
17 white thrombi
![Page 33: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Macrophage Content
Tearney et al, Circulation. 2003;107:113-119
Sensitivity: 100% Specificity: 100% for caps >10% CD68 (raw)
Sensitivity: 70% Specificity: 75% for caps >10% CD68 (log 10)
Raw
Log 10
CD 68
OCT measurements of macrophage density were
independent of fibrous cap thicknessn=26 lipid-rich segments
R=0.84 (P<0.0001)
R=0.47 (P < 0.05)
RAW
LOG 10
![Page 34: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Intraplaque Hemorrhage (?)
Prati et al, EHJ 2009
![Page 35: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Neovascularization (?)
Prati et al, EHJ 2009
![Page 36: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Evaluation of strut coverage by OCT
![Page 37: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Haziness…
Toutouzas, Synetos …Stefanadis Clin Cardiol 2007
![Page 38: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
…Dissection & Thrombus
Toutouzas , Synetos …Stefanadis, Clin Cardiol 2007
![Page 39: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Recanalized Thrombus
Toutouzas , Karanasos, Synetos…Stefanadis JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jun;5(6):688-9
![Page 40: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Θρόμβος
Chromaflo™ Imaging
Φυσιολογικός αυλός
IVUS: απεικόνιζη θπόμβος
![Page 41: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Stent thrombosis, restenosis or underexpansion?
![Page 42: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
![Page 43: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Lumen area: 6.19mm2
Stent area: 6.88 mm2
Neointima thickness: 80 μm
Control
Lumen area: 7.17 mm2
Stent area: 7.45 mm2
Neointima thickness: 40 μm
OCT images28 day follow-up
Toutouzas ..Synetos..Stefanadis AHA 2009
Avastin
![Page 44: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Αξιολόγηζη ζημανηικόηηηαρ βλάβηρ
Καθοδήγηζη ηηρ
αγγειοπλαζηικήρ
(ππιν από ηο stent)
Δκηίμηζη ηος αποηελέζμαηορ
ηηρ αγγειοπλαζηική
ρ
Αξιολόγηζη επιπλοκών μεηά από ηο
stent
Θπόμβυζη &
επαναζηένυζη ηος stent
Σύγκπιζη μεθόδυν
Δκηίμηζη ζύζηαζηρ
πλάκαρ
![Page 46: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Area-length measurementsOCT-IVUS
IVUS measurements are greater than those of OCT. (Resolution? –
Dotter effect?)Yamaguchi et al., Am J Cardiol 2008;101:562–567
![Page 47: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Akasaka EuroPCR 12
![Page 48: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Akasaka EuroPCR 12
![Page 49: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Αξιολόγηζη ζημανηικόηηηαρ βλάβηρ
Καθοδήγηζη ηηρ
αγγειοπλαζηικήρ
(ππιν από ηο stent)
Δκηίμηζη ηος αποηελέζμαηορ
ηηρ αγγειοπλαζηική
ρ
Αξιολόγηζη επιπλοκών μεηά από ηο
stent
Θπόμβυζη &
επαναζηένυζη ηος stent
Σύγκπιζη μεθόδυν
Δκηίμηζη ζύζηαζηρ
πλάκαρ
![Page 50: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Vulnerable Plaque Components
• Fibrous Cap Thickness< 65 μm• Large Necrotic Core• Inflammation• Positive Remodelling
VP Meeting, Eur Heart J 2004.
Schaar, Stefanadis et al
VP Meeting, P. Serruys, A. Colombo,
C. Stefanadis, S. Casscells, J. Schaar, 2007
• Reduced shear stress
• Intravascular Hemorrhage
• Neovascularization
![Page 51: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
MA
CE
(%
)
Time in Years
0 1 2 3
All
Culprit lesion (CL) related
Non culprit lesion (NCL) related
Indeterminate
0
5
10
15
20
25
12.9%
20.4%
11.6%
2.7%
Stone GW et al., N Engl J Med 2011;364:226-35.
![Page 52: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
PROSPECT: Independent predictors of patient and lesion level events by logistic
regression analysis
Stone GW et al., N Engl J Med 2011;364:226-35.
![Page 53: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Stone GW et al., N Engl J Med 2011;364:226-35.
Μελζτη PROSPECT: VH-TCFA ωσ προγνωςτικόσ δείκτησ ςε επίπεδο βλάβησ
+ μικρόσ υπολειπόμενοσ αυλόσ
+ μεγάλη πλάκα
+ μικρόσ υπολειπόμενοσ αυλόσ+ μεγάλη πλάκα
![Page 54: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
![Page 55: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Fibrotic Pathologic intimal
thickeningFibroatheroma
Calcified FA TCFA TCFA with previous
rupturesFibrocalcific
Sangiorgi GM et al, Cath Cardiov Interv 70:203–210 (2007)
![Page 56: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Total 126 lesions
Non-NCCL OCT-
derived TCFA
6.3%
Definite TCFA
(22.2%)
Non-thin-cap IVUS-
derived TCFA
(26.2%)
OCT Derived TCFA
(28.6%)
IVUS-derived TCFA
(48.4%)
Sawada et al, EHJ (2008) 29, 1136–1146
![Page 57: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Vulnerable plaque characteristics are associated with thrombolysis failure
Toutouzas K, Tsiamis E, Karanasos A, Drakopoulou M, Synetos A, Tsioufis C, Tousoulis D, Davlouros
P, Alexopoulos D, Bouki K, Apostolou T, Stefanadis C. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 May;3(5):507-14
![Page 58: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Difference in rupture between STEMI & NSTEMI
STEMI NSTEMI
Toutouzas.. Synetos…Stefanadis, Am Heart J 2011 Jun; 161:1192-9
STEMI patients have greater rupture length and greater
length of missing fibrous cap than NSTEMI patients
![Page 59: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Rupture location in ACS
Rupture CharacteristicsRupture Length(mm) 2.27±1.70
Location of rupture
Distal to the MLS 14(36.8)
MLS 14(36.8)
Proximal to the MLS 10(26.3)
Distance from MLS(mm) 2.01±2.10
Cross Sectional Area(mm2) 4.12±2.68
Minimal Cap Thickness(μm) 59±21μm
Rupture at cap shoulder 26(68.4)
Length of missing fibrous cap(mm) 0.53±0.27
Toutouzas, Karanasos,Synetos…Stefanadis, Am Heart J 2011 Jun; 161:1192-9
![Page 60: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
OCT imaging in ACS
Toutouzas..Synetos..Stefanadis, Heart July 2010
Non-culprit lipid-
rich plaque with
thick cap
Napkin ring –
significant lesion
Plaque rupture
MLS - white
thrombus
Red thrombus
TCFA
Evaluation of culprit lesion in ACS
revealed multiple morphologies
![Page 61: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Neoatherosclerosis
Neoatherosclerosis is frequent and more common among symptomatic patients.Importantly, neointimal rupture is associated with ACS late after stent implantation.
Specific morphological characteristics, such as cap thickness and macrophage infiltrationare associated with rupture of neoatherosclerotic plaques
Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands1st Department of Cardiology, Athens Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
![Page 62: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
OCT - Thermography
37,16
37,18
37,2
37,22
37,24
37,26
ΔΤ=0.03°C
Cap thickness 100 μm
Toutouzas , Synetos , … Stefanadis ACC 2009
,03
,04
,05
,06
,07
,08
,09
,1
,11
,12
Min
Cap T
hic
kness
No Yes
Box Plot
Grouping Variable(s): HOT
Low ΔΤ Ηigh ΔΤ
37.1
37.15
37.2
37.25
37.3
Cap thickness 20 μm
![Page 63: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Toutouzas, Synetos…Stefanadis., ESC 2010
ΔΤ= 0.8oC
![Page 64: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Experimental study
DT M
R(°
C)
DTIVT(°C)
R=0.61, p<0.001
Measurements with MR are corellated with
measurements with IVT
Toutouzas…Synetos..Stefanadis ,Atherosclerosis 2010
![Page 65: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
3D OCT – Shear Stress
Development of an algorithm that can provide us with automated measurements and provide
us with the 3d structure of the vessel allowing the measurement of ESS
First Dept. of Cardiology, Athens Medical School
![Page 66: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Shear Stress Map of the Reconstructed RCA
First Department of Cardiology, University of AthensAristotle University of ThessalonikiHarvard Medical School
![Page 67: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Μελζτη PREDICTION:Συςχζτιςη shear stress με μελλοντικά ςυμβάματα
Stone P, Circulation. 2012 Jul 10;126(2):172-8
Το χαμηλό shear stress ήταν
ανεξάπτητορ ππογνωστικόρ
παπάγονταρ για εξέλιξη βλάβηρ
![Page 68: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Volumetric assessment of TCFA
3D reconstruction for measurement of the area of the thin fibrous cap
Chamie D et al, Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep (2011) 4:276–283
![Page 69: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Hybrid IVUS-OCT catheters
Li et al, Catheter CardiovascInterv 2012Li et al
![Page 70: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Micro OCT
Liu et al, Nat Med 2011 17(8)
![Page 71: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Prati et al.EuroIntervention 2012;8:823-829
![Page 72: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
PCI 2011 GUIDELINES
![Page 73: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Recommendations for Use of FFR, IVUS, and OCT
Lofti et al . Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 00:00–00 (2013)
![Page 74: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
![Page 75: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
• FFR reproducibility data from the landmark DeferralVersus Performance of PTCA in Patients WithoutDocumented Ischemia (DEFER) trial was analyzed
• Two repeated FFR measurements in the samelesion, 10 min apart
• Outside the [0.75 to 0.85] FFR range, measurementcertainty of a single FFR result is >95%
• However, closer to its cut-off, certainty falls to lessthan 80% within 0.77 to 0.83, reaching a nadir of 50%around 0.8
Pedraco et al , JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):222-5.
![Page 76: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS
• OCT and IVUS are nowadays considered as important modalities for the evaluation of the morphological characteristics of a coronary plaque, for the guidance of the PCI, and for the assessment of its result
• Both OCT and IVUS are important tools for the understanding of the natural history of coronary artery disease and the evaluation of the VP
![Page 77: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Conclusions
• Cost effectiveness of IVUS has been proved byrandomised prospective studies, however the costeffectiveness of OCT still needs to be established
• Technologies that increase the overall cost of medicalcare may still be acceptable in the future, but only ifwe can demonstrate improved clinical outcomes thatare meaningful to our patients (i.e., increased lifeexpectancy, reduced symptoms, or improved QOL)
![Page 78: Performing and interpreting IVUS, VH-IVUS & OCT · Monorail Imaging Catheter Non-Occlusive OCT. Occlusive vs non-occlusive technique Kataiwa et al., IJC.2009 Barlis et al., EuroInterv.2009](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062507/5fc305ddfe95af280a6d6d57/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)