Download - Pert Master
-
Primavera Pertmaster
-
2Agenda
Introductions Risk Management Overview Pertmaster Value Proposition Risk Methodology
"Primavera has mastered the art of determining trends in the project portfolio management (PPM) market, identifying the PPM needs of its target markets, and acquiring solutions that fit the vendor's evolving product mosaic. Building on Primavera's own project management solution set, which addresses all nine of the PMBOK areas, the company has built a comprehensive and seamless suite of products that fit a broad base of industry verticals.
Louis Cardin, The Forrester WaveTMDecember 18, 2007
-
3Why Conduct Risk Analysis?
Eliminate project failure Projects fail because plans are unrealistic Execution is not to plan
Achieve greater confidence with project plans Track past performance to forecast future Reduce uncertainty of estimates More realistic schedules
Set appropriate expectations for cost and schedule Determine probabilistic start or finish Manage and allocate resources accordingly Accurate forecasting, Earned Value validation
-
4Project Risk Types
Estimate UncertaintyModel Risk Distributions e.g. 3pt estimates Monte Carlo simulation
Reduction of risk exposure Contingency Risk responses (e.g. mitigation)
Risk EventsModelRisk register/logPI Matrices
Estimate Uncertainty + Risk Events = Total Risk ExposureEstimate Uncertainty + Risk Events = Total Risk Exposure
-
5Primavera Pertmaster Overview
Risk Techniques Schedule improvement: PPM maturity Risk assessment: risk register Risk Analysis: Monte Carlo simulation
Risk-Based Predictive Modeling Confidence in schedule/budget Realistic forecast expectations Contingency assessment Cost-benefit of mitigation scenarios
Pertmasters proven techniques provide risk based predictive modelingacross the entire project lifecycle
Full Lifecycle Risk Management Portfolio risk strategic project selection Project risk tactical project controls/PM Cost and schedule risk analytics
Integration Primavera: P3, P3e, P5, P6, Suretrak MS Project, EPM, Deltek
-
6Why Pertmaster for Risk Management?
P6 Risk Capabilities Risk log basic risk register No risk analytics capabilities Input into Pertmaster
Input > Analysis > OutputAll inputs to Pertmaster
Pertmaster Risk Capabilities Full cost/schedule risk management MC risk analytics engine Publish Risk Adjusted schedule into P6
"It's impossible to hide a bad plan in Primavera." Chris Morris, Agere
-
7Portfolio Analysis Project Planning Project Execution
Project selection? Capacity planning? Minimize risk exposure?
Project completion dates? Confidence levels? Contractor: do-able plan? Owner: Max cost/benefit?
Execution to plan? Avoid risk events? Reduce risk hot spots?
Top-down phases Project alternatives Revenue / expenditure risk
Determine contingency Determine mitigation Cost > schedule integration
Update risk plans Forecast accuracy
Pertmaster Value Proposition
"To improve programme confidence, we've mandated the use of Primavera Pertmaster in all key projects." David Ashkroft, Thales
-
8Risk Methodology
Schedule Review Risk Ready State Review for logic & errors
Risk Identification Estimate Uncertainty Risk Events: Risk Register
Develop Preliminary Risk Model Enter Estimate Uncertainty Map Risks to Activities
Preliminary Analysis & Review Impacted Risk Plan Monte Carlo simulation
Final Model & Report Risk Event plan Response planning
-
9Schedule Check Report
Content can be customised
Examples: Open-ended tasks If a task
has no successor, and it gets delayed, it will not delay the project. Does this reflect reality?
Most Constraints will fix a task to its constraint date, therefore during the analysis, this task will not be delayed, even if it is carrying duration uncertainty!
Schedule logicIf issues are not resolved, then the analysis results will be effected.
-
10
Risk Analysis
Distribution Graph:What is the likelihood of completing this project by 25th December? ONLY 32% of finishing on or before 25th December 07 The earliest this project finished in the simulation was 19th October 2007, the latest
was 04th April 2008
>Confidence Scale>How confident are you?
-
11
Risk Analysis
Tornado Chart Duration Sensitivity Determine the Risk Hotspots in the scheduleWhich tasks are the most sensitive? Which should we mitigate?
-
12
Cost-load schedule
Initial Cost Estimate
Apply estimate uncertainty to cost items
Resources can be time-dependent or independent
-
13
Cost-load schedule
Cost Distribution Graph
Chance of completing this project to budget? 28%
-
14
Cost-load schedule
Tornado Chart Cost Sensitivity Biggest cost drivers may not be the same as the biggest project finish drivers!
-
15
Cost-load schedule
Cost contingency is P80 cost Deterministic Cost
-
16
Cost-load schedule
Duration contingency is P80 Finish Date Deterministic Finish Date
-
17
Cost-load schedule
50% of the iterations when the project was delivered on time 50% of the iterations
when the project was delivered to budget
% number of iterations when the project was delivered on time and to budget is only in this bottom left-hand quadrant = 29%
The Scatter Plot
-
18
7. Cost-load schedule
The dividers (highlighters) can be dragged. This is most effective when the quadrant is locked (50% in this case).
Reducing the budget pushes out the project finish date and vice-versa
-
19
Risk Register
Uncertainty on time and cost has been estimated, but no risk events have been taken into account.
Discrete risks that, if occur, will have a significant impact on time and/or cost.
Risks can be directly inputted into the Risk Register or imported from external systems
-
20
Risk Register
There is a workflow to using the Risk Register. It usually starts with the Risk Scoring scheme Set up qualitative Risk
Scoring (PID) matrix (Edit > Risk Scoring)
Risk Scoring matrix can be configured from 2x2 to 9x9
All fields can edited to conform to the organizations scheme
Scoring templates can be saved, stored and distributed for future projects
-
21
Risk Register
The qualitative risk assessments are inputted here. The values in the drop-down menu are taken from the risk scoring matrix Focusing on one risk, the risk assessment derives a risk score, e.g. 56 for Key
Resource Unavailable
-
22
Risk Tornado Chart
Key Resource Unavailablewas highest scored risk. But is not the biggest driver!
-
23
Risk Mitigation
We have analysed a project with just estimate uncertainty on time and cost, and then looked at a pre-mitigated plan Shows the worst case scenario
Pre-mitigated result shows there is no chance of delivering this project on time or to budget
Lets build in a mitigation strategy and see if it has reduces the risk exposure on this project.
-
24
Risk Mitigation
Where we are now Where we want to beWhat we could do
Cost of each mitigation strategy For e.g. it will cost 32m to reduce Key Res. Unav. probability of
occurrence down from H > VL, and Safety Impact from VH > N, overall score down from 56 to 1.
-
25
Distribution Analyzer
Compare original vs. pre-mitigated Impact of risks is 272.4 days (80% confident)
-
26
Distribution Analyzer
Comparing pre and post at 80% confidence, shows that mitigating these risks will bring the project back by 208 days.
-
27
Distribution Analyzer
Cost S-curves. Will mitigating these risks save money?
-
28
Probabilistic Cash Flow
There is a cash demand in these periods
Amount of cash that was not used in each these periods
-
29
Q&A