![Page 1: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Death Penalty Trials and AppealsPertemuan 11Pertemuan 11
Matakuliah : L0472 - Psikologi ForensikTahun : Feb -2010
![Page 3: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Justification of Punishment• Backward looking
– Retributive
• Forward looking– Detterence– Rehabilitation– Reconciliation
![Page 4: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Detterence• Cross-sectional research• Longitudinal research
![Page 5: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Types of Punishment• Positive punishment• Negative punishment
![Page 6: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Side Effects of Punishment• Skinner (1938)• Boe & Church (1967)
![Page 7: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Death Penalty, Does It Matter?• Severity, or• Immediateness and• Consistency
![Page 8: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Capital Punishment• Link between attitude toward death penalty and
likelihood of conviction– Cannot bar person from serving on jury due to beliefs against
death penalty unless bias would result in ignoring evidence presented
– Research: pro-death penalty more likely from high status, conservative, authoritarian males
![Page 9: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Methods of execution• Electrocution• Lethal injection• Hanging• Shooting• Beheading• Stoning
![Page 10: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Arguments for death penalty• Deter perpetrators – would-be murderers fear being
caught• Protect society - convicted murderers prevented from
killing again• Provide justice for victim – a life for a life• Is state’s responsibility – to preserve order, to right
wrong• Is more humane than alternatives – life imprisonment is
a “living tomb”
![Page 11: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Arguments for death penalty• “Following the prison spokesman's
announcement that Ted (Bundy) was officially dead, sounds of cheers came from the jubilant crowd and fireworks lit the sky. Shortly thereafter, a white hearse emerged from the prison gates with the remains of one of the countries most notorious serial killers. As the vehicle moved towards the crematorium, the surrounding crowd cheerfully applauded the end of a living nightmare.” From www.crimelibrary.com
![Page 12: Pertemuan 11 Death Penalty Trials and Appeals Pertemuan 11 Matakuliah: L0472 - Psikologi Forensik Tahun: Feb -2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081723/5a4d1b507f8b9ab0599a777a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Arguments against death penalty• Is barbaric – against human rights, base vengeance,
state-sanctioned murder• Does not deter crime – no substantial proof of
decreasing crime rates• Takes innocent lives – eg. Timothy Evans, prejudice
against certain groups• Has high costs – cases time-consuming• Has no possibility of rehabilitation – extenuating
circumstances