Presentation by John Bosco Baguri Sumani
UDSWa Campus
During the a GGA/GGTA Conference at KNUST from 1-4th August, 2012
Presentation Outline
IntroductionBrief Literature ReviewProblem statementStudy objectivesStudy area and methodologyResults Conclusion and RecommendationsReferences
Introduction
Successive gov’ts have initiated policies, programs, plans and initiatives to manage out-migration since independence
Literature surveyed revealed that out-migration has been increasing in the Upper West Region
Factors accounting for migration is a subject of debate (Suhrke, 1993, Akokpari, 1998; Perch-Nielson, 2004; Mcleman and Smit, 2006)
Brief Literature survey
• Migration as a developmental challenge (Davidson et al (2003 and Mcleman and Smit, 2006)
• No agreement on causes of migration (suhrke, 1993 ; Akokpari, 1998 and Perch-Nielson, 2004)
• Neo-classical views dominate (Massey, 1993)• Environmental degradation is often mentioned as
physical factors (Suhrke, 1993; Bilsboro, 1991)• Climate is hardly mentioned or only mentioned
tangentially (Perch-Nielsen, 2004)• Hence the design of this
Problem statementNadowli District has been experiencing out-
migration since its creationsReasons for migration:EconomicSocio- culturalPopulation pressureConflicts/warsEnvironmental conditions hardly mentionedEnvironment-migration relations at the general
level without disaggregating the various factors
• However, climatic variables are indispensable resources for agric productivity and production
Climate variability/change has been blame elsewhere for migration (Adelekan and Afolayan, 1999; Magadza,2000; Meze-Hausken, 2000 and Mcleman and Smit,2006)
• Hence, this study was designed to determine the influence of climate variability on human migration
Study objectives
• Main objectivei. To find out the influence of climate variability
on human migration in Nadowli District• Specific objectives:i. Climatic (key variables) trends over the yearsii. Causes of migration
iii The relationships between climatic trends and migration
iv The relationship between migration and sexv The relationship between migration and age,
and finallyvi The socio-economic effects of out-migration
on the source region
Study Approach and Methodology
• The study area is Nadowli District• Data sourcesi. Primaryii. Secondary• Sampling techniquesNon-Probabilityi. Purposive ( GMA and Returned migrants)
• Probability samplingi. Cluster sampling (3 clusters)ii. Western- Sankana & Charikpong; Central- Duong
& Daffiamah and Eastern- Naro & Fian iii.Systematic sampling (25hh in each c’ty)- sample
size of 150• Data collection instruments:i. Questionnaire administrationii. Face –to- interviews iii.FGD
Conceptual Framework
• Climate and migration variables are difficult to bring under 1 framework (Perch-Nielson ,2004 and Mcleman and Smit, 2006)
• This study modified Mcleman and Smit (2006) model with ideas from Meze-Hausken (2000) and Perch-Nielson (2004)
• According to Mcleman and Smit, V=f(Eslit +ACslit)
Conceptual framework in response to climate variability
Causes of migration
Economic Socio-cultural Environmental Population Conflict/wars
Climate variability Climatic conditions
Agric performance
Hsehold decisionCan cope?
Yes, no migration No, Out-migration
Perceived favourable destination Seasonal Permanent
Modified C’ties:.Previous membersReturn migrants
Results
Community Description of Temperature
Temperature
Pre-2000 Post-2000 Future
Description Frequency (%) Frequency (%) Frequency Percentage
cool 130 87 0 0 0 0
warm 18 12 150 100 99 66
Don't know 2 1 0 0 51 34
Total 150 100 150 100 150 100
Source: Field notes. 2011
Rain Days
Community description of rainfall
Table 4.11: Community description of rainfall
Rainfall
Pre-2000 period Post-2000 period
Description Frequency Percent (%) Frequency Percentage (%)
Adequate 139 97 2 1
Inadequate 11 3 148 99
Don't know 0 0 0 0
Total 150 100 150 100
Source: Field notes, 2011
Causes of migration
%
Destination of migrants
Duration of migrants?
Sex of migrants
Socio-economic effect of migration
Consequence Frequency Percentage (%)
Beneficial 131 87
Negative 9 6
Neutral 10 7
Total 150 100
Conclusion
• Over 90% of the people of the study area are peasant farmers and therefore climate-dependent
• Climate variability is the major cause of out-migration in the Nadowli District
• Out-migration is the last resort • There is an inverse relationship between MAR
and MAT
• Climate- induced migration is affects men decision to migrate than women
• There is an emerging pattern and trend of migration (destination and duration)
• Out-migration is generally beneficial with minor negative consequences
Recommedations
1. Vigorous public education on adaptation and mitigation strategies
2. Construction of irrigation dams/dug outs3. Provision of improved seeds and crop varieties4. Provision of micro-credits to peasant farmers,
especially women5. Cultivation of non-traditional crops and
livestock rearing
6. Improved climate prediction and weather forecasting
7. Formulation and implementation of migration policy
References
• Abdul-Korah, G.B. (2007). ‘Where is not home?’: Dagaaba migrants in the Brong Ahafo Region, 1980 to the present. African Affairs, 106, 71-94.
• Adelekan, I. O. & Afolayan, A. (1999). The role of climatic variations on migration and human health in Africa. The Environmentalist, 18(4), 213-218.
• Adiku, S. G. K., Dayananda, P. W. A., Rose, C. W. & Dowuona, G. N. N. (1997). An analysis of the within-season rainfall characteristics and simulation of the daily rainfall in two savanna zones in Ghana. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 86, 51-62.
• Akokpari, J. K., (1998). The State, refugees and migration in Sub-Saharan Africa. International migration, 36, 211-234.
• McLeman, R. and Smit, B. (2006). Migration as an adaptation to climate change. Climatic Change, 76, 31-53.
• Nabila, J.S. (1974). The migration of the Frafra of northern Ghana: A case study of cyclical labor migration in West Africa .Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.