Transcript
Page 1: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Conserving the Forests, Lakes and Streamsof Northeast Michigan

Page 2: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 3: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Large scale attempt Bundles different

project types Geography based Focuses efforts Broad partnership

Page 4: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 5: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

7 miles of high-quality tributary stream reconnected

100 tons of sediment source eliminated from stream

20 acres of invasive species treated

Nearly a mile of instream habitat and buffers installed

Page 6: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 7: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Process of collecting data across a watershed

Systematic approach Used to guide future

project selection

If this was in your favorite watershed and I handed you $25,000 for a project, would you replace this culvert?

Page 8: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Talk with your neighbors and compare your site to theirs.

If you had $25,000, would you still replace your site?

Page 9: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 10: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Ocqueoc River Watershed

Completed by Huron Pines

State - Approved In 2006

Resource Inventories Public Involvement Zoning Review Set forth

Recommendations

Page 11: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Acreage: 94,394 Miles of stream: 30

miles of mainstream Land use

• Farming• Forestry• Rural• 20% public land

Geology:• Limestone bedrock• Karst formations

Page 12: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Public meetings Ocqueoc River

Watershed Commission• Volunteer-led steering

committee Habitat Committee

• Informal group of the “hands on” partners

Page 13: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 14: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Celebrated success Capitalized on

momentum Revisited the plan Wanted to “bite off

more” Discussed priorities Explored options Dissected the

watershed

Page 15: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 16: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 17: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Site 36 Silver Creek/Spens

Rd Sediment issues from

long steep approach Fish Passage: velocity

barrier

Page 18: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

10 sites on Silver Creek 3 miles of stream Major Sediment issues

at 3 sites No Fish Passage at 3

sites 4 with moderate issues Bundled for 1 project:

• Context• Sites 29-37• Also includes 2

driveways

Page 19: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

10 sites Road work for

sediment Realignment Increase capacity

of culverts

$500,000 total

Page 20: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Grants were submitted to Several Initial Sources

Paul H. Young Chapter of Trout Unlimited• $2,600

Headwaters Chapter of Trout Unlimited• $1,000

Michigan Fly Fishing Club• $3,000

Page 21: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 22: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Began meeting with individual funders

Discussed ORWC and Habitat Committee

Letters of Support Resource Advisors

Review

Page 23: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 24: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 25: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 26: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Township Meetings Engineering Partner Excitement to

begin work Community Site

Tours

Page 27: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 28: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation: Sustain Our Great Lakes• $133,510

Truly became watershed approach

Included:• Streambank erosion

control• Stream buffers• Private landowner

meetings• Invasive species

removal

Page 29: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 30: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 31: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 32: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

6 total sites complete• 4 full replacement• 2 road resurfacing

2 crossings permitted and culverts on order

Over 400 landowner contacts

2 acres of invasive species treated or removed at 8 sites

36 tons of sediment prevented

Public meetings Consistent “stop-bys”

Page 33: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 34: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 35: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 36: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 37: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 38: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 39: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 40: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 41: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 42: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 43: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 44: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 45: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 46: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

2 Culverts permitted and on order

Driveway work planned for 2012

Streambank erosion Instream Habitat Invasive Species Landowner

involvement

Page 47: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 48: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success
Page 49: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

Coordinating most knowledgeable partners

Motivating and Inspiring

Teaching Learning Staying focused Believing

Page 50: Project Prioritization and Stream Restoration Success

www.huronpines.org


Top Related