Transcript
Page 1: Protein-ligand binding volume determined byweb.vu.lt/.../uploads/2017/01/LBD14_poster.pdf · Protein-ligand binding volume determined by FPSA, densitometry, and NMR Zigmantas Toleikisx,

Protein-ligand binding volume determined byFPSA, densitometry, and NMRZigmantas Toleikis§, Vladimir A. Sirotkin†, Gediminas Skvarnavicius§, Joana Smirnoviene§,Christian Roumestand‡, Daumantas Matulis§, and Vytautas Petrauskas§**E-mail: [email protected]§Department of Biothermodynamics and Drug Design, Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania†A.M. Butlerov Institute of Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia‡Centre de Biochimie Structurale, Université Montpellier I et II, Montpellier, France

XIV International Conference of the Lithuanian Biochemical Society | June 28 – 30, 2016 | Druskininkai, Lithuania

INTRODUCTIONWe report the values of recombinant human heat shock pro-tein 90 (Hsp90) binding volumes (i.e., the changes in proteinvolume associated with ligand binding), which were obtainedby three independent experimental techniques – fluorescentpressure shift assay (FPSA), vibrating tube densitometry, andhigh-pressure NMR. Within the error range all techniques pro-vide similar volumetric parameters of investigated protein-ligand systems.

LIGANDS

NH2 N SNH

N

N

N

Cl

N

OH

Cl

OOH

OH OH

O

O

OH

ICPD91 ICPD9 ICPD1

Cl

O

OO

OH

OH

O

OO

OH

OH

Cl

O

OO

OH

AZ1 AZ2 AZ3

OH

Cl

OH

N N

S

O

OH

OH

N N

S

O

OH

Cl

OH

O

OO

O

ICPD47 ICPD62 Radicicol

FLUORESCENT PRESSURE SHIFT ASSAY (FPSA)System of equations describing a protein dosing curve – the relationship between concentrationof added ligand, Lt, total protein concentration, Pt, and melting pressure, pm:

Lt = (exp(−∆GU/RT )− 1)

(Pt

2 exp(−∆GU/RT )+

1

exp(−∆Gb/RT )

), (1)

∆Gx = ∆G0_x + ∆Vx(pm − p0) +∆βx

2(pm − p0)

2; x = U, b, (2)

where ∆G0, ∆V and ∆β are standard state Gibbs energy, volume and compressibility factor,respectively, and indexes U and b stand for the changes related to protein unfolding and protein-ligand binding.

Flu

ore

scen

ce y

ield

(a.u

.)

1000

2000

3000

4000

p (MPa)0 100 200 300

Lt (μM of AZ2) 0 10 30 50

(a)

Δp m

(MP

a)

0

50

100

150

200

Lt (M)

0 10−6 10−5 10−4

Hsp90αN + ICPD1 AZ2 ICPD91 ICPD9

pur

e H

sp90

αN

(b)

(a)

FIGURE: (a) Unfolding profiles and (b) dosing curves of Hsp90αN.

HIGH-PRESSURE NMRThe Kd’s of Hsp90αN interaction with a ligand is calculatedfrom the chemical shift change, ∆δ, dependency on Lt and Pt:

∆δ = ∆δmaxY −

√Y 2 − 4LtPt

2Pt,

Y = Lt + Pt +Kd.

FIGURE: (a) ∆δ of Hsp90αN amino acids which were inducedby AZ3 and ICPD9 ligands. (b) ∆δ of Val92 as a function ofICPD9 concentration at 30 MPa, 120 MPa, and 150 MPa pres-sures. (c) AZ3-induced shifts in Hsp90αN (PDB ID: 1UYL).

DENSITOMETRY

The partial molar volume of a protein, V 0, and the change in protein volume associated with theligand binding, ∆Vb, are calculated using equations:

V 0 =M

d0− d− d0

Cd0, (3) V 0(R) = V 0(0) + α∆Vb, (4)

where M and C are molecular mass and molar concentration of a protein, d0 and d are densitiesof solvent and protein solution, respectively, and α is the fraction of ligand-bound protein:

α = 0.5 (1 +R+Kd/Pt)−√

0.25 (1 +R+Kd/)2 −R. (5)

Here Kd is the dissociation constant of the protein-ligand complex and R = Lt/Pt.

Solu

tio

n d

ensi

ty (g

/cm

3 )

0.9990

0.9992

0.9994

0.9996

0.9998

Ratio Lt / Pt

0 1 2 3 4

Hsp90αN + radicicol ICPD47 ICPD62 AZ3

(a)

V 0

(cm

3 /m

ol)

21360

21400

21440

21480

Ratio Lt / Pt

0 1 2 3 4

Hsp90αN + AZ3 ICPD47 ICPD62 radicicol

(b)

FIGURE: (a) Raw densitometry data and (b) the partial molar volumes of Hsp90αN at variousR.

BINDING VOLUMES

∆Vb (FPSA) ∆Vb (Densitometry) ∆Vb (NMR) Kd

ICPD91 −1± 5 cm3/mol n.d. n.d. 3× 10−5 MICPD9 −2± 5 cm3/mol n.d. 20± 4 cm3/mol 2× 10−5 MAZ3 −7± 6 cm3/mol −10± 3 cm3/mol −9± 4 cm3/mol 9× 10−5 MAZ2 −9± 6 cm3/mol n.d. n.d. 1× 10−3 MICPD1 −9± 6 cm3/mol n.d. n.d. 3× 10−5 MAZ1 −21± 11 cm3/mol n.d. n.d. 2× 10−3 MICPD47 −40± 14 cm3/mol −49± 5 cm3/mol n.d. 5× 10−9 MICPD62 n.d. −50± 4 cm3/mol n.d. 2× 10−9 Mradicicol −170± 60 cm3/mol −124± 7 cm3/mol n.d. 2× 10−10 M

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis research was funded by a grant (no. MIP-004/2014) fromthe Research Council of Lithuania.

Top Related