December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
1
Reference Model for Economically Sustainable
Digital Curation
Brian Lavoie, OCLCChris Rusbridge, Consultant
IDCC11 WorkshopBristol, England
8 December 2011
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
2
BACKGROUND
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
3
Foundations for progress
15 years ago …Focus on digital preservationas a technical problem
OAIS Reference ModelOrganized problem space and providedfoundation for future progress
Today … Focus on digital curationas economic/organizationalproblem
Report: “Sustainable Economics for a Digital Planet:Ensuring Long-Term Access to Digital Information”
Draft: “Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation” Organize problem space, providefoundation for future progress
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
4
Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation and Access
• Task Force:– Supported by NSF, Mellon, JISC, Library of Congress, CLIR, NARA– Cross-domain: cultural heritage, academia, public sector, private sector– Cross-discipline: computer scientists, economists, archivists, librarians
• Goal: Frame digital preservation as sustainable economic activity– Define and characterize the problem space– Provide practical recommendations for key decision-makers– Establish foundations of an economics of digital preservation
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
5
• Comprehensive description of fundamentals of economics of digital preservation– Definition of economic sustainability in digital preservation context– Identification and explanation of core economic attributes of digital
preservation, and their impact on sustainability
• Practical findings and recommendations to aid preservation decision-making:– Based on detailed economic analysis of 4 key digital preservation
scenarios– Both context-specific and general recommendations
• “Second-order results”: concepts, vocabulary, organizing framework to shape future work on economically sustainable digital preservation
Final Report:Sustainable Economics for a Digital Planet:Ensuring Long-Term Access to Digital Information
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
6
Some reflections on the report …
• Strengths:– Relevant to virtually all digital preservation activities– Comprehensive assessment of the economic infrastructure needed to
support successful digital preservation– Well-suited to inform high-level strategic analysis and planning
– Solid foundation for future work on economics of digital preservation
• But …– Lengthy narrative form (110 pages) aimed at senior decision-makers– Not easily applied as a practical tool for developing a sustainability
strategy for a particular curation context
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
7
Reference Model (via Wikipedia)
• “model … that embodies the basic goal or idea of something and can then be looked at as a reference for various purposes”
• Attributes:– Abstract: not real things, but abstract representation of things (concepts) – Entities and Relationships: things that exist, and how they relate/interact– Within an environment: describes a particular problem space– “Technology agnostic”: does not make assumptions about the real-world
environment that would reduce its applicability
• Uses:– Create standards for entities and relationships– Educate (deconstruct and analyze the problem space)– Improve communication – Create clear roles and responsibilities– Compare implications of alternative solutions
e.g., OAIS
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
8
Reference model for economically sustainable digital curation
• Model that embodies the basic goal of economically sustainable digital curation and can then be looked at as a reference for building a sustainability strategy for a curation activity.
• Attributes:– Abstract: key concepts of economic sustainability – Entities and Relationships: ecosystem of stakeholders and relationships– Within an environment: focuses on economic aspects of digital curation– “Technology agnostic”: applicable to most digital curation contexts
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
9
REFERENCE MODEL FOR ECONOMICALLY SUSTAINABLE DIGITAL CURATION
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
10
Preservation or curation?
• Lots of interpretations!• Preservation: we are taking to mean actions at
the archival stage (cf OAIS)– Digital assets less active, value harder to
determine• Curation: we are taking to mean caring for the
digital asset throughout its life– Value easier to identify at active use stage and in
aggregate
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
11
DigitalAssets
Stake-holders
CurationProcess
SustainabilityStrategy
A sustainability strategy orchestrates the Key Entitiesto achieve Sustainability …
BenefitsSelectionIncentives
Organization/governanceOngoing resource allocation
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
12
Summary of Model
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
13
Economic lifecycle
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
14
Creator
RightsHolder
Current Beneficiaries
FutureBeneficiaries
Managing Agency
Representatives of the Long-term
Public Interest
Supply-side Demand-side
Lifecycle Management
DigitalAssets
“Investors”
Ecosystem Layer 1: Roles
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
15
Creator
RightsHolder
Current Beneficiaries
FutureBeneficiaries
Managing Agency
Representatives of the Long-term
Public Interest
Supply-side Demand-side
Lifecycle Management
DigitalAssets
“Investors”
Ecosystem Layer 2:Relationships
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
16
Economic risks• What is affected by economic risks?
– Value– Selection issues– Incentives – Rights issues– Organisational issues (including policy)– Resources
• Risk actions– Avoid – Reduce/mitigate **– Transfer – Accept
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
17
Commentary so far
• Style too dense; needs work• Alternative economic lifecycle model• Need business plan rather than sustainability
strategy?• Balancing value, risk, and reassurance• Concern we’re not covering preservation• Framework of use cases for stakeholder
categories?
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
18
Commentary so far - 2
• Comment on aggregate value• Scope and target audience not clear• Limited spheres of influence for stakeholders• Sustainability strategy needs to be less abstract• Comments on balance in text
Abstracted wildly from comments, see web site for actual commentary text & image!
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
19
Contacts/Links
Brian Lavoie: [email protected] Rusbridge: [email protected]
Reference model:http://unsustainableideas.wordpress.com/
economic-sustainability-ref-model-page/(Google: sustainability reference model)
Blue Ribbon Task Force:http://brtf.sdsc.edu/ (web site)http://brtf.sdsc.edu/biblio/BRTF_Final_Report.pdf
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
20
Reference Model for Economically Sustainable
Digital Curation:
Tools & Evidence
IDCC WorkshopBristol, UK
December 8, 2011
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
21
Theory to practice …
Tools to aid in applyingreference model
concepts & frameworks
Development ofevidence base of
“worked examples”
Reference model:Concepts & frameworks
Practical application:Real-world decision-making
(sustainability strategy design)
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
22
Ex: KRDS Benefits Analysis Toolkit
KRDSBenefits Framework
Value Chain & Benefits Impact Tool Partner case studies
User Guides
http://beagrie.com/krds-i2s2.php
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
23
Tools (wishlist!)
• Design template: basic steps to navigate through process of designing a sustainability strategy
Step 1: Understand environmentWhat is the economic lifecycle?
Who are the key stakeholders?Step 2: Characterize curation activityStep 3: Identify risksStep 4: Select remedy
etc.
Creator
RightsHolder
Current Beneficiaries
FutureBeneficiaries
Managing Agency
Representatives of the Long -term
Public Interest
Supply -side Demand-side
Lifecycle Management
DigitalAssets
Resource Providers
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
24
More tools
• Interactive questionnaires: Guides to help gather relevant information for well-defined subsets of sustainability decision-making process
Example: Characterizing the stakeholder ecosystemIs the community of beneficiaries well-defined/tightly
coordinated?Is there currently significant usage of the digital assets in
question, or is usage expected in the future?Are there organizations/associations that could act as
liaisons to the community of beneficiaries?etc.
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
25
More tools• Taxonomies & checklists: Lists of real-world
examples of “concepts in practice”
Example: Risk Taxonomy• Creation of curation service: unpersuasive value proposition,
diffused/uncoordinated beneficiaries, etc.• Continuation of curation service: interruptions of funding
flows, loss of key stakeholders, etc.
Example: Starter taxonomies for key relationships in stakeholder ecosystem
• “grants preservation rights to”, “acts on behalf of” “supplies resources to”, etc.
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
26
Hinting at greater complexity…
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
27
More tools
• Adapt existing tools produced for other contexts– KRDS Activity Model (curation process)– KRDS Benefits Analysis Toolkit (value proposition)– Risk assessment tools
• Tool to explore the economic lifecycle
• User guides
• Other ideas???
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
28
Evidence base
• Accumulate evidence base of case studies in sustainability that highlight:– Distinctive features that help digital curation
activities map to case studies similar to local circumstances
– Linkages between environmental & curation activity characteristics, salient economic risks, and effective remedies
– Best practices for using reference model/tools to support process of designing a sustainability strategy
– Shortcomings in reference model/tools that can be addressed in future revisions
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
29
Case studies: different perspectives
• Focus on specific digital curation activities …
• Or generalize to classes of activities– Scholarly discourse; Research data; Commercially-
owned cultural content; Collectively-produced Web content (cf. BRTF report)
– More?
• Encourage range of international contexts
• Provide template to facilitate creation of case studies and promote consistency of information provided across case studies
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
30
Possible next steps
• Identify points in reference model where tools would aid practical application
• Encourage one or two digital curation activities to design & refine tools based on local testing of reference model
• Encourage several digital curation activities to “seed” the evidence base with case studies; develop case study template for wider use
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
31
Reference Model for Economically Sustainable
Digital Curation:
Concluding Discussion
IDCC WorkshopBristol, UK
December 8, 2011
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
32
Questions for discussion …• Are any key sustainability-related concepts & entities from the
curation problem space missing from the reference model?
• How does the reference model link up with other digital curation tools and resources (e.g., OAIS, KRDS, DCC Digital Lifecycle, etc.)?
• What are the best mechanisms for encouraging take-up of the reference model within the digital curation community?
• What are the key use cases for the reference model?– Communicating sustainability plans to funders?– Coordinating digital curation discussions among stakeholders ?– Analyzing impact of alternative policy options?– Foundation for standards-building?
• Other comments?
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
33
Contacts/Links
Brian Lavoie: [email protected] Rusbridge: [email protected]
Reference model:http://unsustainableideas.wordpress.com/
economic-sustainability-ref-model-page/(Google: sustainability reference model)
Blue Ribbon Task Force:http://brtf.sdsc.edu/ (web site)http://brtf.sdsc.edu/biblio/BRTF_Final_Report.pdf
December 2011 Draft Reference Model for Economically Sustainable Digital Curation
34
Thank you!