Transcript
Page 1: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Representation 2

Page 2: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Page 3: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

René Magritte: Two Mysteries (1966)

Page 4: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Mise an abyme

‘put in an abyss’ . Infinite regression On your breakfast table is your packet of

cornflakes, and on your packet is a picture of the smiling Kellogg family at breakfast, and on their table is a picture of your packet which has a picture of the smiling Kellogg family, and so on (M. Ashmore)

e.g. Hamlet: the ‘mousetrap scene’ Midsummer Night’s Dream: the play of the ‘rude

machanicals’

Page 5: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

• Re-presentations: we think that the model (‘reality’) precedes, pre-exists the representation

Page 6: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Representations and schemata

• Do we represent what we see?

Page 7: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Magritte: The Uses of Speech

Page 8: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Magritte: The Interpretation of Dreams

Page 9: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Alain: „Egyptian life class”, 1955

Page 10: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Relief of the divine birth of Hatshepsut

Page 11: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Gentile da Fabriano: Adoration of the Magi (1322-3)

Page 12: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Rubens:

Adoration of the

Magi

(1633)

Page 13: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Power of representations

‘society of the spectacle’ (Guy Debord)

Images replace what we see

Emile Zola: “I don’t think we can claim that we have seen something until we have not photographed it”

Page 14: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Magritte: The Human Condition

Page 15: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Andy Warhol: Marilyn (green) 1960s

Page 16: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Andy Warhol: Marilyn (pink) 1960s

Page 17: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Warhol’s pictures

• no ‘realism’

• cheap, poor quality, mass-produced image

• face – soul

• the body is well-known public property:

• an image where the soul should be

Page 18: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Claude glass - Thomas Gainsborough

Page 19: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Tintern Abbey through a Claude glass

Page 20: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Claude glass

• Named after Claude Lorrain

• Small portable mirror tinted with dark foil

• Recommended to 18th-century painters

• picturesque effect

• the very idea of ‘landscape’

Page 21: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Tintern Abbey

Page 22: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Technologies of representation

• New technologies change our views of representation itself and of the mind

(camera obscura; ‘photograhic memory’)

• They change what we (can) see and how we see

Page 23: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Prosthetic images

• we could not see these things otherwise

• Microscope was called by Richard Hooke, its inventor, an „artificial organ” (1665), that ‘supplies the infirmities’ of the natural

• How can we check images of the ‘invisible’?

Page 24: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

19th-century cartoon about the microscope

Page 25: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

the dark side of the moon

Page 26: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Mrs. Röntgen’s

hand

Page 27: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)
Page 28: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

embryo scan

Page 29: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

M. C. Escher: Relativity

Page 30: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

• M. C. Escher: Waterfall

Page 31: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

analog and digital images

• digital vs analog technologies of making images

• Digital images stored as data

• ‘represent’ a matrix rather than an image

• Images are generated

Page 32: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

the hyperreal

• HYPERREAL: ‘the generation by models of of a real without origin in reality’ (Jean Baudrillard)

• images that are not representations

• generated by formulas, algorithms

Page 33: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

cyberspace • “I looked into one of the video arcades. I

could see in the physical intensity of their postures how rapt the kids were…These kids clearly believed in the space games projected. Everyone I know who works with computers seems to develop a belief that there’s some kind of actual space behind the screen, someplace you can’t see but you know is there.” (William Gibson: Neuromancer)

Page 34: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Barbie dolls

Page 35: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Barbie doll • Originally designed as a fashion doll for

adults (Mattel, 1959) • Teaches fixed, normative gender roles to

girls (codes of femininity: defined through the body, standards of dress and behaviour

• ‘Barbie is a consumer. She demands product after product, and the packaging and advertising imply that Barbie, as well as her owner, can be made happy only if she wears the right clothes and owns the right products” (Marilyn Ferris Motz)

Page 36: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Barbie/2

• multicultural Barbies: same body

(racial difference )

• ethnic, aerobic, fitness phases

• female body as ‘cultural plastic’

• desexualised in detail

• over-eroticised in general outlines

• impossible body

Page 37: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Sindi (Cindy) Jackson: Living Doll

Page 38: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Valeria Lukyanova

Page 39: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

human Barbie

Page 40: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Technologies of the body

• You can shape your body into whatever you want it to be

• Elastic body: transformer

• Barbie and human Barbies as ‘posthuman’

Page 41: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

SIMULACRUM

e.g. Somehuman Barbies:

thing modelled on an image that has no original

Page 42: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Tasaday tribe (Philippines)

Page 43: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

• Disneyland

• “Disneyland is there to conceal the fact that it is the ‘real’ country, all of ‘real’ America, which is Disneyland … Disneyland is presented as imaginary to make us believe that the rest is real, when in fact all of Los Angeles and the America surrounding it are no longer real, but of the order of the hyperreal and of simulation.” (Baudrillard)

Page 44: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

William

Wallace

monument

Page 45: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Braveheart

Page 46: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

PaulFoelsche:Lialloon

(1879,NewGuinea)anthropo-

metry

Page 47: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Anthropometry,

„Bertillonage”

Alphonse

Bertillon, Prefect

of Paris Police

(late 19th

century)

Page 48: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

‘Lialloon’

- The photo constructs ‘us’ as its makers and beholders

- us= civilised, modern Europeans

- possessing the ‘scientific gaze’

Page 49: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

What does ‘Lialloon’ represent?

- Lialloon: not an individual - provides ‘objective knowledge’ (photography

is ‘true’) - (1) image of ‘barbarity’ for us (an ‘other’) –

Barbarity, primitivism: - (2) ‘noble savage’ (touched up with charcoal)- (3) potential criminal (Foelsche: colonial

administrator) - allegory of ‘race’

Page 50: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

The politics of representation

• „politics” = power is involved

• Who has the right (power) to represent something?

Who tells the story of extinct peoples? history written by the winners

technological inequality

Page 51: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

James Bond: Roger Moore or Sean Connery

Page 52: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

posters of Dr. No (1962)

Page 53: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Pierce Brosnan / Daniel Craig

Page 54: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

• “He was a comely handsome fellow, perfectly well made; with straight strong limbs, not too large; tall and well shaped … He had a very good countenance, not a fierce and surly aspect; but seemed to have something very manly in his face, and yet he had all the sweetness and softness of an European in his countenance too, especially when he smiled. His hair was long and black, not curled like wool… The colour of his skin was not quite black, but very tawny; and yet not of an ugly yellow nauseous tawny, as in the Brasilians, but of a bright kind of a dun olive colour, that had in it something very agreeable, though not very easy to describe.” (Defoe: Robinson Crusoe, 1719)

Page 55: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Robinson Crusoe and Friday

Page 56: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Robinson Crusoe and Friday 2

Page 57: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Bronislaw Malinowski

Page 58: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Bronislaw Malinowski among the Trobriand Islanders (1918)

Page 59: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Malinowski’s diary (1918)• “At 5 I went to Kaulaka. A pretty, finely built

girl walked ahead of me. I watched the muscles of her back; her figure, her legs, and the beauty of the body so hidden to us, whites, fascinated me. Probably even with my own wife I’ll never have the opportunity to observe the play of back muscles for as long as with this little animal. At moments I was sorry I was not a savage and could not possess this pretty girl. At Kaulaka, looked round, noting things to photograph.”

Page 60: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

• „America was invented before it was discovered” (Giuseppe Cocchiara)

• „Who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.” (Orwell: Nineteen Eighty-Four + ADF’s ‘Memory War’)

Page 61: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Politics of representation

• Representations: political practices, sites of conflict and resistance

• Representations can be changed, revised• Jean Rhys: Wide Sargasso Sea

(madwoman’s story in Jane Eyre) • J. M. Coetzee: Foe (Friday and Susan

Barton)• Michel Tournier: Friday or the Ends of the

Pacific

Page 62: Representation 2. René Magritte: The Treachery of Images (1928-9)

Friday (French film, 1981)


Top Related