Download - Six sigma - yellow belt program v3-030610
MDeverywhere
Congratulations…….. On Joining the Six Sigma Journey
1
MDeverywhere
• What is Quality?
• Know Six Sigma
• Introduction to Six Sigma as methodology
• Awareness with respect to origin and history of Six Sigma.
• The Six Sigma organization
• Variation and Normal Distribution
• The Pareto Principle reading and Making Paretos.
2
MDeverywhere
What is Quality?
3
MDeverywhere
Historically
Proactive Quality“Create process that will produce less or no defects”
Contemporary
Reactive QualityQuality Checks (QC) - Taking the defectives out of what is produced
4
MDeverywhere
ToolsOrganization
Methodology
Process variation
LSL USL
Upper/Lower specification
limits Regression•••••••• •••• •••
••••
•••• •• ••
••• ••••
••••• ••
•••••
Driven by
customer
needs
Enabled by quality team.
Led by Senior Mgmt
Define Measure
Analyze Improve ControlVendorVendorProcess BProcess BProcess AProcess ACustomerCustomer VendorVendorProcess BProcess BProcess AProcess ACustomerCustomer
VendorVendorProcess BProcess BProcess AProcess ACustomerCustomer VendorVendorProcess BProcess BProcess AProcess ACustomerCustomer
Process Map Analysis
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
L K A F B C G R D
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Frequency Cumulative Frequency
Pareto Chart
MDeverywhere
Methodologies Standards Capability Models
•Six Sigma•Lean
•ISO 9000, ISO 14000 etc.•COPC•Malcolm Baldrige
•eSCM•CMM•CMMI
Scientific way to improve capability?
Sharing Benchmarked
practices- “Standardizing”
Best practices to build
capability
6
MDeverywhere
• It is a methodology for continuous improvement
• It is a methodology for creating products/ processes that perform at high standards
• It is a set of statistical and other quality tools arranged in unique way
• It is a way of knowing where you are and where you could be!
• It is a Quality Philosophy and a management technique
Six Sigma is not:
• A standard
• A certification
• Another metric like percentage
7
MDeverywhere
• The term “sigma” is used to designate the distribution or spread about the mean (average) of any process or procedure.
• For a process, the sigma capability (z-value) is a metric that indicates how well that process is performing. The higher the sigma capability, the better. Sigma capability measures the capability of the process to produce defect-free outputs. A defect is anything that results in customer dissatisfaction.
8
MDeverywhere
4 Sigma 6,210 Defects
2 Sigma 308,537 Defects
3 Sigma 66,807 Defects
5 Sigma 233 Defects
6 Sigma 3.4 Defects
Sigma levels and Defects per million
opportunities (DPMO)
9
MDeverywhere
Is 99% (3.8) good enough? 99.99966% Good – At 6
20,000 lost mails per hour 7 lost mails per hour
Unsafe drinking water almost 15 minutes each day
One minute of unsafe drinking water every seven months
5,000 incorrect surgical operations per week
1.7 incorrect surgical operations per week
2 short or long landings at most major airports daily
One short or long landing at major airports every five years
200,000 wrong drug prescriptions each year
68 wrong drug prescriptions each year
Example quoted from GE Book of Knowledge - copyright GE
10
MDeverywhere
• The term “Six Sigma” was coined by Bill Smith, an engineer with Motorola
• Late 1970s - Motorola started experimenting with problem solving through statistical analysis
• 1987 - Motorola officially launched it’s Six Sigma program
MotorolaMotorola The company that invented Six SigmaThe company that invented Six Sigma
MotorolaMotorola The company that invented Six SigmaThe company that invented Six Sigma
11
MDeverywhere
• Jack Welch launched Six Sigma at GE in Jan,1996
• 1998/99 - Green Belt exam certification became the criteria for management promotions
• 2002/03 - Green Belt certification became the criteria for promotion to management roles
GEGEThe company that perfected Six SigmaThe company that perfected Six Sigma
GEGEThe company that perfected Six SigmaThe company that perfected Six Sigma
12
MDeverywhere 13
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Six_Sigma_companies
MDeverywhere 14
And Now…
MDeverywhere
Six Sigma OrganizationSix Sigma OrganizationSix Sigma OrganizationSix Sigma Organization
15
MDeverywhere
Master Black BeltMaster Black Belt
Black BeltBlack Belt Black BeltBlack Belt
Green BeltGreen Belt
Green BeltGreen Belt
Green BeltGreen Belt
- Thought Leadership- Expert on Six Sigma- Mentor Green and Black Belts
- Thought Leadership- Expert on Six Sigma- Mentor Green and Black Belts
- Backbone of Six Sigma Org- Mentor Green Belts- Full time resource- Deployed to complex or “high
risk” projects
- Backbone of Six Sigma Org- Mentor Green Belts- Full time resource- Deployed to complex or “high
risk” projects
- Part time or full time resource- Deployed to less complex projects in areas of functional expertise
- Part time or full time resource- Deployed to less complex projects in areas of functional expertise
16
MDeverywhere
• Basic - Six Sigma Awareness• Green Belt Projects• Participate in Black Belt Projects• Assist business functions with day to day
activities
• Mentor/Train Green Belts• Black Belt Projects• Change Agents• Work along with the business owners
• Mentor/ Train Black Belts• Run Strategic projects• More Strategic than tactical role
Green Belt (GB)Green Belt (GB)
Black Belt (BB)Black Belt (BB)
Master Black Belt (MBB)Master Black Belt (MBB)
Highly paid!Highly paid!Work like a Consultant!Work like a Consultant!
Huge demand in the industry!Huge demand in the industry!
Overall…A high flying Career!!Overall…A high flying Career!!
17
MDeverywhere
BPMSBPMSBusiness Process Management SystemBusiness Process Management System
BPMSBPMSBusiness Process Management SystemBusiness Process Management System
DMAICDMAICSix Sigma Improvement MethodologySix Sigma Improvement Methodology
DMAICDMAICSix Sigma Improvement MethodologySix Sigma Improvement Methodology
DMADVDMADVCreating new process which will perform @ Six Creating new process which will perform @ Six
SigmaSigma
DMADVDMADVCreating new process which will perform @ Six Creating new process which will perform @ Six
SigmaSigma
18
MDeverywhere
THE DMAIC MODEL – For attaining Excellence in existing Processes
DefineDefine MeasureMeasure AnalyzeAnalyze ImproveImprove ControlControl
Combination of change management & statistical analysis
DefineDefine MeasureMeasure AnalyzeAnalyze DesignDesign VerifyVerify
THE DMADV MODEL - Setting up New Processes to Deliver @ SIX SIGMA also known as DFSS ( Design For Six Sigma)
19
MDeverywhere
Define Process Mission Map Process VOC and VOP Build PMS Develop DashboardsIdentify Improvement
Opportunities
Define purpose of the process, its goal and its boundaries
Identify Critical to Quality and Critical to process
Visual representation of performance
Map process steps, identify input/ output measures
MSA, DCP, indicators and monitors
Service excellence and process excellence
The DMAIC cycle
20
MDeverywhere
• To understand the process; it’s mission, flow and scope
• To know the customers and their expectations
• To identify, monitor and improve correct performance measures for the process
21
MDeverywhere
DMAICDMAICSix Sigma Improvement MethodologySix Sigma Improvement Methodology
DMAICDMAICSix Sigma Improvement MethodologySix Sigma Improvement Methodology
22
MDeverywhere
• A logical and structured approach to problem solving and process improvement
• An iterative process (continuous improvement)
• A quality tool with focus on change management
Essentially Six Sigma DMAIC Is……………
Y = F(X1,X2,X3…………………Xn)
23
MDeverywhere
Practical Problem
StatisticalProblem
Statistical Solution
Practical Solution
24
MDeverywhere
DDefine
MMeasure
AAnalyze
IImprove
CControl
Identify and state the practical problem
Validate the practical problem by collecting data
Convert the practical problem to a statistical one, define statistical goal and identify potential statistical solution
Confirm and test the statistical solution
Convert the statistical solution to a practical solution
25
Monitor and Sustain implemented solutions / processes and make new processes a way of Life.
MDeverywhere 26
MDeverywhere
If the outcome of a process when observed over multiple instances / data points is not consistent then the process is termed as a process with variation.
The term variation refers to the amount of fluctuations which creep into a process over time.
Variation doesn’t essentially mean missing targets or customer expectations all the time. Its more about measuring the inconsistency in a process and is a vital measure in determining the process capability.
Variation = Spread around the centre
27
MDeverywhere
Measurement Variation
Generally a result of an improper or non-calibrated measurement system which produces different outputs in different attempts even with all measuring parameters constant.
or
Variation in the way you measure a process
Process Variation
Result of random or non random causes
or
Variation as part of a process
28
MDeverywhere
Measurement system variation is often a result of the following few reasons
1. Inappropriate measurement tools being used providing inaccurate or inconsistent results for the same exercise.
2. Least count is not granular enough to provide precise outputs.
3. Operators not adequately trained etc.
Measurement errors are commonly termed as GRR errors i.e. Gauge of Repeatability and Reproducibility errors
29
MDeverywhere 30
Common Causes:– Random variation (usual)– No pattern– Inherent in process– Adjusting the process decreases its variation
Special Causes– Non-random variation (unusual)– May exhibit a pattern– Assignable, explainable, controllable– Adjusting the process decreases its variation
MDeverywhere 31
MDeverywhere
A normal distribution is bell-shaped and symmetric.
The mean (mu) controls the center and standard deviation/variation (s) controls the spread
The distribution is determined by the mean (mu, and the standard deviation (s)
3232
MDeverywhere
For any normal curve :
– 68 percent of the observations fall within one standard deviation of the mean.
– 95 percent of observation fall within 2 standard deviations and
– 99.7 percent of observations fall within 3 standard deviations of the mean.
3333
MDeverywhere
Add up about 30 of most things and you start to be “normal”
Normal distributions are divide upinto 3 standard deviations on each side of the mean
Once your that, youknow a lot about what is going on
And that is what a standard deviation is good for
34
MDeverywhere
The world tends to be bell-shaped
Most outcomes occur in the
middle
Fewer in the “tails”
(lower)
Fewer in the “tails” (upper)
Even very rare outcomes are
possible(probability > 0)
Even very rare outcomes are
possible(probability > 0)
35
MDeverywhere
4-36
11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 1010Sample numberSample number
UpperUppercontrolcontrol
limitlimit
ProcessProcessaverageaverage
LowerLowercontrolcontrol
limitlimit
Out of controlOut of control
36
MDeverywhere
Shot a rifle? Played darts? Shot a round of golf? Played basketball?
Emmett
Jake
Who is the better shot?
37
MDeverywhere
What do you measure in your process? Why do those measures matter? Are those measures consistently the same? Why not?
38
MDeverywhere
Deviation = distance between observations and the mean (or average) Emmett
Jake
Observations
10
9
8
8
7
averages 8.4
Deviations
10 - 8.4 = 1.6
9 – 8.4 = 0.6
8 – 8.4 = -0.4
8 – 8.4 = -0.4
7 – 8.4 = -1.4
0.0
871089
39
MDeverywhere
Deviation = distance between observations and the mean (or average) Emmett
Jake
Observations
7
7
7
6
6
averages 6.6
Deviations
7 – 6.6 = 0.4
7 – 6.6 = 0.4
7 – 6.6 = 0.4
6 – 6.6 = -0.6
6 – 6.6 = -0.6
0.0
76776
40
MDeverywhere
Variance = average distance between observations and the mean squared Emmett
Jake
Observations
10
9
8
8
7
averages 8.4
Deviations
10 - 8.4 = 1.6
9 – 8.4 = 0.6
8 – 8.4 = -0.4
8 – 8.4 = -0.4
7 – 8.4 = -1.4
0.0
871089
Squared Deviations
2.56
0.36
0.16
0.16
1.96
1.0 Variance
41
MDeverywhere
Variance = average distance between observations and the mean squared Emmett
Jake
Observations
7
7
7
6
6
averages
Deviations Squared Deviations 76776
42
MDeverywhere
Variance = average distance between observations and the mean squared Emmett
Jake
Observations
7
7
7
6
6
averages 6.6
Deviations
7 - 6.6 = 0.4
7 - 6.6 = 0.4
7 - 6.6 = 0.4
6 – 6.6 = -0.6
6 – 6.6 = -0.6
0.0
Squared Deviations
0.16
0.16
0.16
0.36
0.36
0.24
76776
Variance
43
MDeverywhere
Standard deviation = square root of variance
Emmett
Jake
Variance Standard Deviation
Emmett 1.0 1.0
Jake 0.24 0.4898979
But what good is a standard deviation
44
MDeverywhere
Add up the dots on the dice
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Sum of dots
Pro
ba
bili
ty 1 die
2 dice
3 dice
Here is why: Even outcomes that are equally likely (like dice), when you add them up, become bell shaped
45
MDeverywhere 46
Day – 2
MDeverywhere
This is also known as the "80/20 Rule“
The rule states that about 80% of the situations of the problem can be traced to 20% of possible causes.
The Pareto principle was developed by an Italian economist who noticed that 80% of the wealth was owned by 20% of the population.
47
MDeverywhere
The Pareto principle implies that we can frequently solve a problem by identifying and attacking the “vital few” sources.
This principle can be applied to most systems and processes.
The concept is used to dissect a large problem into smaller pieces and in order to identify the biggest contributors.
Pareto analysis helps to ‘localize’ the problem
48
MDeverywhere
Most of the equipment breakdowns are due to a small percentage of the equipment.
The majority of calls to a IT help desk are attributed to a small number of reasons.
Most of the errors in any process occur in one or two process steps.
Only a handful of students in the school district account for most of the tardy events.
49
MDeverywhere
A graphical representation of the Pareto Principle.
A series of bars whose heights reflect the frequency of the problem.
A graph where data is categorized to expose patterns.
50
Billing relatedPatient
responsibilityCoding related Front end
Patient demo related
Provider credentialing
relatedNot a denial Others
Denial Count 65684 29744 19476 13322 11108 5470 4429 9800
Cumulative Percent 41 60 72 81 88 91 94 100
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100MDe Denial Analysis Jan10-Apr10
MDeverywhere
Bar height shows relative importance; indescending order
Bars represent each stratified category
Vertical axis shows relative percentages
“Other” category can be used. It’s always last.
Vertical axis shows count of data points
The line shows cumulative percentages
51
Billing relatedPatient
responsibilityCoding related Front end
Patient demo related
Provider credentialing
relatedNot a denial Others
Denial Count 65684 29744 19476 13322 11108 5470 4429 9800
Cumulative Percent 41 60 72 81 88 91 94 100
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100MDe Denial Analysis Jan10-Apr10
MDeverywhere
The Pareto Principle applies if one or more categories account for a large percentage of the occurrences.
Look for the bars that are much taller than the rest.
52
MDeverywhere
Focus your improvement efforts on the largest category or categories of the Pareto Chart, in order to achieve the maximum gain.
Only focus on a smaller bar if it has a larger impact or is easier to fix.
Using only the data from the large categories of the Pareto Chart, determine if they can be further stratified into additional categories.
5353
MDeverywhere
Tardiness by Grade
0
20
40
60
80
100
5th grade 4th grade 3rd grade 2nd grade 1st grade
Grade
No.
of T
ardi
ness
Eve
nts
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
2nd level Pareto Chart
If the data from the Pareto chart
can be stratified further, create 2nd or
even 3rd level charts.
Analyze these charts to determine if the
Pareto Principle applies.
When you’ve narrowed down the
problems on the deepest levels you will
start finding root causes.
1st level Pareto Chart Tardiness events by school
0
50
100
150
200
250
Brentwood Forest Hills Cravensroft Glendale Wendell Smith Maple Street Randall
School
# o
f T
ard
y E
ven
ts
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Tardiness by Student
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Joe Tim Sofia Ann Maria Laura James Leroy Ken Other
Student
No
. of
Tar
din
ess
Eve
nts
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
3rd level Pareto Chart
54
MDeverywhere
The Pareto Principle does not apply if all the categories account for an approximately equal percentage of the occurrences.
All the bars are about the same height.
55
MDeverywhere
Do not analyze the tallest bar any further. It is clear that this categorization is not related to the root cause of the problem.
You need to find another way to look at the data. - Determine if there is another way to stratify the data.
- Normalize the data (make all the categories comparable by making the thing you are measuring into a rate).
5656
MDeverywhere
Occurrences in the “other” category should be redistributed to existing categories or a new category should be created
If you create an “other” category ensure that it is not one of the larger bars on the chart.
57
MDeverywhere 258
MDeverywhere 2
What is a Pareto Chart? A graphical representation of the Pareto Principle.
A series of bars whose heights reflect the frequency of the problem.
A graph where data is categorized to expose patterns.
Billing relatedPatient
responsibilityCoding related Front end
Patient demo related
Provider credentialing
relatedNot a denial Others
Denial Count 65684 29744 19476 13322 11108 5470 4429 9800
Cumulative Percent 41 60 72 81 88 91 94 100
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100MDe Denial Analysis Jan10-Apr10
5959
MDeverywhere 2
Billing relatedPatient
responsibilityCoding related Front end
Patient demo related
Provider credentialing
relatedNot a denial Others
Denial Count 65684 29744 19476 13322 11108 5470 4429 9800
Cumulative Percent 41 60 72 81 88 91 94 100
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100MDe Denial Analysis Jan10-Apr10
Bar height shows relative importance; in descending order
Bars represent each stratified category
Vertical axis (secondary) shows cumulative percentages
“Other” category can be used. It’s always last.
Vertical axis (primary) shows count of data points (Denial Count)
This line shows cumulative percentages
60
60
MDeverywhere 2
;
6161
1. Enter all Attributes that Contribute to the Problem2. Sort occurrences of each one of them in descending order3. Calculate their individual contribution percentage to the overall problem.4. Calculate cumulative frequency to club top contributors together.5. A table Similar to the picture below should appear on your screen.
MDeverywhere 2
Step 2: Go to INSERT tab of excel 2007 and click on COLUMN
Select the 1st histogram of 2D COLUMN
Now the Histogram is ready
6262
MDeverywhere 2
Step 3: Right click on the RED bar, then click on the “Change Series Chart Type”
Then select first Line graph
6363
MDeverywhere 2
Steps for Making Pareto in Excel 2007Step 4:
Right click on the RED line, then click on the “Format Data Series”
Select Series Options
Select Secondary Axis
6464
MDeverywhere 2
Steps for Making Pareto in Excel 2007Step 5:
Right click on the BLUE bar, then click on the “Format Data Series”
Reduce the Gap Width to 0%
Right Click on the secondary Axis> Go to Format Axis> Axis Options
Make the Maximum fixed 100.00
6565
MDeverywhere 2
Steps for Making Pareto in Excel 2007
Step 6: Pareto is Ready for ANALYSIS
Billing relatedPatient
responsibilityCoding related Front end
Patient demo related
Provider credentialing
relatedNot a denial Others
Denial Count 65684 29744 19476 13322 11108 5470 4429 9800
Cumulative Percent 41 60 72 81 88 91 94 100
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100MDe Denial Analysis Jan10-Apr10
6666
MDeverywhere 2
If the data from the Pareto chart
can be stratified further, create 2nd or
even 3rd level charts.
Analyze these charts to determine if the
Pareto Principle applies.
When you’ve narrowed down the
problems on the deepest levels you will
start finding root causes.
Lower Level Pareto Charts
Billing relatedPatient
responsibilityCoding related Front end
Patient demo related
Provider credentialing
relatedNot a denial Others
Denial Count 65684 29744 19476 13322 11108 5470 4429 9800
Cumulative Percent 41 60 72 81 88 91 94 100
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100MDe Denial Analysis Jan10-Apr10
Covered By
Another Payer
Untimely Filing
Claim Not On File
Claim In Process
Need Notes/Re
ports
Claim Send For
Reprocess
Need Primary
Eob
Allowed Amont Already
Paid
Claim Paid To Patient
Claim Previously Processed
Others
Denial Count 16303 11371 9507 6714 5669 3230 3121 2706 1902 1667 3494
Cumulative Percent 25 42 57 67 75 80 85 89 92 95 100
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100Billing Related Denial Analysis Jan10-Apr10
LMC NJU HNH HH UPGWCMC
United
CareUPB
PBS Men
tal
MCOR
Pandelis
B
V Ledd
y
E Meji
a
Park Leno
x
WCMC
Team
Rehab
Neuro
Indiana
Infect
Disease
Providen
ce
Lakhani
Methuselah
DeAngeli
s
Bucks
Derm
A Szab
o
Pizzica
Jude Muneses
Somerse
t
Lubbos
Gotham
RWJLandmar
k
Ron Lewi
s
Others
Denial Count 299 268 204 107 774 670 533 391 389 388 379 349 328 317 309 290 263 256 228 218 210 192 190 172 169 164 151 145 137 135 132 120 251
Cumulative Percent 15 29 40 46 50 53 56 58 60 62 64 66 67 69 71 72 73 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 83 84 85 86 86 87 100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500Billing>>Covered By Another Payer>>By Client
1st level Pareto Chart
2nd level Pareto Chart
3rd level Pareto Chart
67