![Page 1: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing
G. Rumolo, G. Iadarola, H. Bartosik
![Page 2: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5x 1014
Time [h]
Tota
l int
ensi
ty [p
]
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0
20
40
60
Time [h]
Hea
t loa
d [W
/hc]
→ After injection and transverse damper set up, 3.5 days of 25ns beam at 450 GeV (6 – 9 December, 2012)
→ Fast intensity ramp up: only one fill with trains of 72 bunches, then trains of 288 bunches
→ Several fills with maximum number of bunches (2748) Very good efficiency Injection time limited by vacuum in the MKI (beginning), then by time required by cryo
to re-adjust to the increasing heat load
Record intensity: 2.7 x 1014 p
Beam 1 Beam 2
![Page 3: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5x 1014
Time [h]
Tota
l int
ensi
ty [p
]
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5x 10-13
Time [h]
HL/
I [W
/(hc
p)]
Beam 1 Beam 2
Normalized heat load in Sector 5 – 6
→ Scrubbing progress from heat load Clear improvement during the first 60 – 70 hours Slow-down of the process in the last part of the scrubbing
![Page 4: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
→ Beam quality evolution Overview on lifetimes during scrubbing Also from the lifetimes, after a clear improvement at the
beginning, the process seems to significantly slow down
![Page 5: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5x 1014
Time [h]
Tota
l int
ensi
ty [p
]
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 801.35
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
1.6
Time [h]
SEY
max
→ Reconstructing the SEY evolution during the scrubbing run Starting from an initial value of 1.55, the dmax in the arc dipoles
seems to quickly flatten at a value slightly below 1.45 Unexpected leveling of the process
From heat load measurements and PyECLOUD simulations
![Page 6: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Vacuum evolution (I)• Significant improvement seen in the vacuum (pressure gauges used for
the SEY analysis in the LSS).
Thanks to O. Dominguez, V. Baglin
![Page 7: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Clearer trend in terms of normalized pressure(pressure gauges used for the SEY analysis in the LSS).
Thanks to O. Dominguez, V. Baglin
Vacuum evolution (II)
![Page 8: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500
2
4
6
8
Time [h]
Inte
n. [p
x10
13],
Ener
gy [T
eV]
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
0
20
40
60
Time [h]
Hea
t loa
d [W
/hc]
84b
156b 372b
804b804b
→ Heat load in the arcs when ramping up the energy Enhanced heat load probably due to photoelectrons (804 bunches at 4 TeV
produce the same heat load as 2748 bunches at 450 GeV) Violent transient during the ramp (limit of the # of bunches) Not much additional scrubbing visible …
Thanks to L. Tavian
![Page 9: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
→ Beam quality evolution Between the test ramps at 4 TeV and the physics run, there were three more
fills at 450 GeV (14 – 15 December, 2012) Heat load as high as in previous fills with 2748 bunches Emittance degradation still present with 288b fills
170 180 190 200 210 220 2300
5
10
15
20
Time [h]
Inte
n. [p
x10
13],
Ener
gy [T
eV]
170 180 190 200 210 220 230
0
20
40
60
Time [h]
Hea
t loa
d [W
/hc]
170 180 190 200 210 220 2300
5
10
15
20
Time [h]
Inte
n. [p
x10
13],
Ener
gy [T
eV]
170 180 190 200 210 220 230
0
20
40
60
Time [h]
Hea
t loa
d [W
/hc]
Fill 3437: four trains of 288b + one of 144b
Thanks to T. Rijoff, H. Maury-Cuna
![Page 10: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
• Electron cloud in the arcs elsewhere than in the dipoles?→ Quadrupoles, multipoles
• Modeling of the SEY curve → What happens at low energies?→ Re-diffused electrons
• Scrubbing on cold surfaces behaves differently than scrubbing on warm surfaces→ The COLDEX experience
![Page 11: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
• Electron cloud in the arcs elsewhere than in the dipoles?→ Quadrupoles, multipoles
• Modeling of the SEY curve → What happens at low energies?→ Re-diffused electrons
• Scrubbing on cold surfaces behaves differently than scrubbing on warm surfaces→ The COLDEX experience
![Page 12: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
1 1.5 2 2.510
-4
10-2
100
102
104
SEY
Hea
t loa
d [W
/hc/
beam
]
DipoleQuadrupoleDrift
→ Possible interpretation Cells composed of 80% dipoles, but also 6% quadrupole + 14% drift & multipoles SEY thresholds are different in dipole/drift (1.45) or quadrupole (1.2) Electron cloud in dipoles is dominant (1-2 orders of magnitude) as long as dmax >
1.5 in dipole chambers But now quadrupoles (and multipoles?) could be dominant …
→ This could explain Saturation of scrubbing process (scrubbing curve
becomes very steep for SEY below 1.3) Long memory between trains Horizontal blow up
![Page 13: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
• Electron cloud in the arcs elsewhere than in the dipoles?→ Quadrupoles, multipoles
• Modeling of the SEY curve → What happens at low energies?→ Re-diffused electrons
• Scrubbing on cold surfaces behaves differently than scrubbing on warm surfaces→ The COLDEX experience
![Page 14: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
ELECTRON CLOUD STUDIES AND BEAM SCRUBBING EFFECT IN THE SPSJ.M. Jimenez, G. Arduini, P. Collier, G. Ferioli, B. Henrist, N. Hilleret, L. Jensen, J-M. Laurent, K. Weiss, F. Zimmermannhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/615159?ln=it
The Effect of Gas Ion Bombardment on the Secondary Electron Yield of TiN, TiCN and TiZrV Coatings For Suppressing Collective Electron Effects in Storage RingsF. Le Pimpec, R.E. Kirby F.K. King and M. Pivihttps://cds.cern.ch/record/924733?ln=it
![Page 15: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
THE SECONDARY ELECTRON YIELD OF TECHNICAL MATERIALS AND ITS VARIATION WITH SURFACE TREATMENTSV. Baglin, J. Bojko1, O. Gröbner, B. Henrist, N. Hilleret, C. Scheuerlein and M. Taborellihttps://cds.cern.ch/record/466534?ln=it
![Page 16: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
THE SECONDARY ELECTRON YIELD OF TECHNICAL MATERIALS AND ITS VARIATION WITH SURFACE TREATMENTSV. Baglin, J. Bojko1, O. Gröbner, B. Henrist, N. Hilleret, C. Scheuerlein and M. Taborellihttps://cds.cern.ch/record/466534?ln=it
MEASUREMENTS AT EPA OF VACUUM AND ELECTRON-CLOUD RELATED EFFECTSV. Baglin, I. R. Collins, O. Gröbner, C. Grunhagel, B. Henrist, N. Hilleret and B. JenningerChamonix XI
![Page 17: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
170 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500
0.5
1
1.5
2
Energy [eV]
SEY
0 20 400
0.5
1
1.5
Energy [eV]
SEY
R=1
![Page 18: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
THE CHEMICAL ORIGIN OF SEY AT TECHNICAL SURFACESR. Larciprete, D. R. Grosso, M. Commisso, R. Flammini, R. CiminoProceedings of ECLOUD12
![Page 19: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
UsualCosFlat
![Page 20: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.810
-6
10-4
10-2
100
102
SEY
Scru
bbin
g do
se (5
0eV)
[mA
/m]
72bpi - cos low en.288bpi - cos low en.72bpi - usual mod.288bpi - usual mod.
1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.810
-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
SEY
Scru
bbin
g do
se (5
0eV)
[mA
/m]
72bpi - flat low. en.288bpi - flat low. en.72bpi - usual mod.288bpi - usual mod.
![Page 21: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
• Electron cloud in the arcs elsewhere than in the dipoles?→ Quadrupoles, multipoles
• Modeling of the SEY curve → What happens at low energies?→ Re-diffused electrons
• Scrubbing on cold surfaces behaves differently than scrubbing on warm surfaces→ The COLDEX experience
![Page 22: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Ep
qsecondaries
elastically reflected
rediffused
![Page 23: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Re-diffused electrons are not included in our models…
⇒ Re-diffused electrons enhance the build up⇒ Can impact up to a factor 2 on heat load
calculations (e.g. LHC, PS2)
With re-diffused, POSINST model (G. Bellodi, 2004, ISIS studies)
No re-diffused (present model)
⇒ In the present ECLOUD/PyECLOUD model, electrons are either reflected or cause secondary emission
![Page 24: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Effect of re-diffused electrons: LHC heat load simulations (M. Furman)
![Page 25: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
• Electron cloud in the arcs elsewhere than in the dipoles?→ Quadrupoles, multipoles
• Modeling of the SEY curve → What happens at low energies?→ Re-diffused electrons
• Scrubbing on cold surfaces behaves differently than scrubbing on warm surfaces→ The COLDEX experience
![Page 26: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
ELECTRON CLOUD AND BEAM SCRUBBING IN THE LHCN. Hilleret, O. Bruning, F. Caspers, I.R. Collins, O. Grobner, B. Henrist, J.-M. Laurent, M. Morvillo, M. Pivi, F. Ruggiero, X. Zhang
![Page 27: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
MEASUREMENTS AT EPA OF VACUUM AND ELECTRON-CLOUD RELATED EFFECTSV. Baglin, I. R. Collins, O. Gröbner, C. Grunhagel, B. Henrist, N. Hilleret and B. JenningerChamonix XI
THE SECONDARY ELECTRON YIELD OF TECHNICAL MATERIALS AND ITS VARIATION WITH SURFACE TREATMENTSN. Hilleret , V. Baglin, J. Bojko, O. Gröbner, B. Henrist, C. Scheuerlein, M. TaborelliLHC Project Report 433 (2000)
![Page 28: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
R. Cimino, A surface study on the origin of SEY reduction on accelerator walls, in Electron Cloud Simulations Meeting,29/07/2011
Dose [C/mm2]
10-8 10-6 10-4 10-2 1001
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
SEY m
ax
Dose [C/mm2]
Scrubbing of Cu measured
with e- at 500eV
C. Yin Vallgren, Ph.D. thesis, CERN-THESIS-2011-063(2011)
![Page 29: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
THE CHEMICAL ORIGIN OF SEY AT TECHNICAL SURFACESR. Larciprete, D. R. Grosso, M. Commisso, R. Flammini, R. CiminoProceedings of ECLOUD12
![Page 30: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
In general (Cu on StSt):
1. E > 100 eV2. About 10-2 C/mm2
dmax below or about 1.2 Scrubbing curve flattens for doses above
10-3 C/mm2 (dmax below 1.3)
Measurements of scrubbing on warm surfaces
![Page 31: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
THE LATEST NEWS ON ELECTRON CLOUD AND VACUUM EFFECTS J.M. JIMENEZ, on behalf of the AT Department/Vacuum Group Chamonix XIII
![Page 32: Some thoughts on the evolution of LHC scrubbing](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5681618a550346895dd125bd/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Latest results from COLDEX V. BaglinAPC, 16/05/2005