THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE–THENEXT30YEARS.
2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
2 | Page
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY.........................................................................................................................................................3ENVIRONMENTINWHICHCRSOPERATES...........................................................................................................................4ImmediateImpactoffundingshortfallonservicedelivery.................................................................................................4Caseexamples–ListeningtothevoicesofCRSclients........................................................................................................5
CaseExample1)preventionoffamilyvioenceandbuildingcapacityforconflictresoluton...........................................5CaseExample2)Journeyingtowardsco-parenting-CommunityMediationServices....................................................6CaseExample3)Fromfamilycrisistofamilyresilience,–YouthCrisisMediationService.............................................6
WHYCONTINUETOINVEST?................................................................................................................................................7Alternativedisputeresolutionworks:Itcandeliverbetteroutcomesforindividualsinvolvedintheseprocessesthantraditionaljusticemodels.................................................................................................................................................7Alternativedisputeresolutionisacosteffectivewaytoresolvedisputes......................................................................7TheACTmodelofcommunityledalternativedisputeresolutioncontinuestobeinnovativeandanexampleofbestpractice.............................................................................................................................................................................7TheACTGovernmenthascommittedtobecomingarestorativecommunity.................................................................7Thereisgrowingevidenceregardingtheusefulnessofalternativedisputeresolutionprocessesandrestorativepracticeinsolvingcomplexsocialissues..........................................................................................................................7
WHYSHOULDGOVERNMENTINCREASEFUNDING?............................................................................................................9Demandisincreasingandhasoutstrippedanyincreaseinfundinglevels......................................................................9Complexityincasesisincreasingandresolutionrequiresmoretimeandresources....................................................10Methodologiesareevolvingandengagementislesslikelytoresultinformalmediation............................................12ThetrendsoutlinedaboveareadverselyimpactingonCRS’operationalcapacity.......................................................14
CRSPROPOSALFORADDITIONALFUNDING......................................................................................................................15Restorestaffingbacktopre2017/18levelstomeetdemand($100,000).....................................................................15Upgradeoffacilitiesatthegrffincentre($15,000)........................................................................................................15AdditionalinvestmentinadministrativeandorganizationalinfrastructureandTechnology($50,000).......................15Investingindevelopmentactivitiestodevelopasustainablebusinessmodelintothefuture($70,000).....................16Leadingthecommunityresponsetorestorativepractice($75,000).............................................................................16
CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................................................................17ENDNOTES.........................................................................................................................................................................18ATTACHMENTA:THEECONOMICIMPACTOFAREDUCTIONINCRSSERVICES………………………………………………………………20
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
3 | Page
EXECUTIVESUMMARY
Foroverthirtyyears,theConflictResolutionService(CRS)communityhasprovidedaninvaluableservicetotheACTcommunityandeconomy,providingalternativemethodsfordisputeresolution.CRShasoperatedinadynamicenvironment,andinasectorthatisexperiencingunprecedentedchangeandtransformation.
Alternativedisputeresolutionapproachesareawell-testedwayofmanagingconflictanddisputes.Theyarecosteffective,andoftendeliverbetteroutcomesforpeoplewhoarebeingsupportedtoresolveconflict.Theyarenowbeingcomplementedbyrestorativeapproaches.TheACTGovernmenthassignalleditsintentiontodeclareCanberraa‘RestorativeCity’,andrestorativepracticeisincreasinglybeingrecognisedaswaytorespondtoconflictinchallengingsocialareasincludingelderabuse,disability,domesticandfamilyviolence,andchildprotectionandout-of-homecare.
CRSisthesoleproviderinCanberraofcommunitydisputeresolutionsupportservices,withotherAustralianjurisdictionsdeliveringthesesameservicesthroughGovernmentdepartments.iAssuchCRSistheGovernment’sresponsetoacorecommunityneedwhichcoversmultipleportfoliosrelatedtoJustice,Policing,SchoolsandYouth,FamilyViolence,HomelessnessandCommunityDevelopment.Thismulti-portfoliocharacteristicofCRShasbeendemonstratedthroughthefundinghistoryofCRSoverthepasttwentyyears,whichhasseenGovernmentfundingsourceschangefromJustice&CommunitySafety,Health,Education,andSocialHousingandHomelessnesswithintheCommunityServicesDirectorate.
CurrentlyallCRScontractsareadministeredthroughSocialHousingandHomelessnesswithintheCSD.CRSbelievesthatconsiderationshouldbegiventothenatureofitsspecialisedcommunitydisputeresolutionservicesanditsmulti-portfoliorelevance,andtheneedforacabinetlevelconsiderationofthisbudgetproposal.
InthiscontextoverthelasttenyearsCRShasabsorbedasignificantincreaseofdemandandcomplexityincaseswhichhassignificantlyoutstrippedincreasedfundingintheorganisation.ThisbudgetsubmissionseekstoaddressthisimbalancewhichrepresentsasignificantthreattotheACTGovernment’scommitmenttomeettheneedsforalternativedisputeresolutionsupportservicesinthecommunity.Overthistenyearperiod,therehasbeen:§ adoublingofourclientnumbers;§ analmostfivefoldincreaseincontactwithclients;and§ atenfoldincreaseinthetimespentwithclients.
Inresponse,CRShashadnooptionbuttodivertresourcestofrontlineservices,whichhaserodedorganisationalinfrastructureandcapacity,andhasseriouslythreatenedthelonger-termsustainabilityoftheorganisation.
Inthe2017/18financialyearthissituationthenforcedCRStoreduceitsstaffingandcutitsserviceoutputbyapproximately50%.Assuch,weknowthatnowmanyvulnerableCanberransarenotabletoaccessthedisputeresolutionsupporttheyneed.Thiswillhaveanegativeimpactuponindividuals,familiesandupontheefficiencyofotherexpensiveandmoreadversarialdisputeresolutionsystemsintheACT(i.e.Policing,Courts,ACAT,YouthJusticesystem,LegalAidandCommunityLegalservices).CostBenefitAnalysisstronglysupportsthisclaim(SeeAppendixAontheEconomicImpactofaReductioninCRSServices).
Assuch,CRSisapproachingtheACTGovernmentwithaproposalforGovernmenttoincreasetheinvestmentinCRSbymodest$300,000forthe2018/19financialyear.
Thiswillenabletheorganisationto:
RestoreCRSstaffingbacktopre-2017/18levelstomeetbasicdemand($100,000); UpgradefacilitiesattheGriffinCentre($15,000); Investinadditionaladministrativeandtechnologyresources($50,000); Investresourcesinbusinessdevelopment,tounlockthepotentialoffee-for-serviceactivities($70,000);and InvestinCRS’worktodevelopcommunityledrestorativepracticeinareasofkeyneed($75,000).
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
4 | Page
ENVIRONMENTINWHICHCRSOPERATES
Thereisrecognitionthatalternativedisputeresolutionandrestorativepracticescancontributetoaprogressiveandcohesivecommunity.TheACTGovernmenthasconsistentlyrecognisedthevalueofcommunitybasedprocesses,mostnotablythroughitsinvestmentinCRSastheleadingagencytosupportfamily,neighbourhoodandcommunityalternativedisputeresolutionservices.ThegoalofCanberrabecomingaRestorativeCityrequiresawholeofcommunityresponse,andthisendeavourhasitsbestchancetosucceedifthereisinvestmentintocommunityinfrastructureandcommunityleadershiplinkedtothebroaderworkofalternativedisputeresolutionprocesses.
ThisopportunitycomesatatimeofsignificanttransformationfortheACTcommunitysector.iiCRShasnotbeenimmunetotheimpactofincreaseddemandandcomplexityintermsofclientsandtheoperationalenvironment.
Asdemonstratedbelow,overthelasttenyearstherehasbeenasignificantmismatchofinvestmentanddemand.Whilefundinghasincreasedbyafactorof2.7,outputhasincreasedtenfold.Todatethishasbeenmanagedbysacrificinginvestmentinareassuchasofficeaccommodation,systemsandadministrationinordertoprioritiseservicedelivery.ThisisnolongerafeasibleapproachandCRSurgentlyneedstoinvestininfrastructure,locatedtofit-for-purposepremises,developa
sustainablebusinessmodel,diversifyitsfundingsourcesandexpanditsserviceofferingsinrestorativepractice.
IMMEDIATEIMPACTOFFUNDINGSHORTFALLONSERVICEDELIVERY
TheCRSwasestablishedafterthecommunitybuiltthecasefortheimportanceofanindependentandcommunitybasedalternativedisputeresolutionserviceandsincethistimehasexistedwithsupportfromtheACTGovernment.
CurrentlytheACTGovernmentprovidesfundingofapproximately$630,000annuallytosupportcoreoperationsoftheorganisation.Thisincludesprovidingalternativedisputeresolutionservicestothecommunityinareasincludingfamilybreakdownandfamilystress,neighbourdisagreement,communityconflictandworkplaceissues.
ACTGovernmentServiceFundingAgreementsfortheCDPprogramsetsoutthetargetgroupforCRSservicedeliveryasfollows:
RESIDENTSOFTHEACTWHOAREEXPERIECINGCONFLICTWHOAREEITHER:1)LOWINCOME;2)VULNERABLE; 3)DISTRESSED
RESTORATIVECITY?Onthe10February2016theACTLegislativeAssemblycalledontheACTGovernmentto:WorktowardsthedeclarationofCanberraasarestorativecity,whichwillconfirmitscommitmenttoexploringandimplementingcreativesolutionstosharedproblemsusingrestorativeprocessesandcontinuingtheACT’svisionforsafetyandmoreconnectedcommunities.
OVERTHELASTTENYEARSTHEREHASBEENASIGNIFICANTMISMATCHOFINVESTMENTANDDEMAND.
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
5 | Page
CRShaseightofficestaff(6FTE)andinanygivenyearbetween15-25qualifiedmediatorsonourcommunitypanelwhoareengagedonacasualbasis.CorealternativedisputeresolutionmethodologiesthatCRSemploysincludepre-mediationsupport,mediation,youthcrisismediation,facilitation,conflictcoachingandcommunityeducation,trainingandaccreditation.
ThesituationofCRSfundingnotmatchingtheincreaseddemandhasbeenfurthercompoundedbythecumulativeimpactovertenyearsofcommunitysectorsalariesincreasingannuallybyabout5%peryear,yetACTGovernmentfundingonlyincreasesby2%peryear.
InresponsetothissituationCRShashadnootherchoicebuttoreducestaffhours,andreduceitsservicedeliveryoutputbyaround50%.SinceAugust2017thesereductionsinstaffhourshaveresultedinaninabilityforCRStorespondtoincomingrequestsforfromthepublicforservicesandforthefirsttimeinitshistory,theestablishmentofphonelinediversionstoansweringmachines,andthetriagedwaitinglists.
CRSistheonlycommunitybaseddisputeresolutionserviceinCanberraforlowincome,vulnerableanddistressedpeoplewhoarestuckindestructiveconflict.WehavealwaysmaintainedarigorousIntakeassessmentprocess,andreferoutextensivelytootherserviceproviderswhencasesdonotmeetourspecificservicemandate.WealsoregularlywithdrawourserviceswhendisputesarenotsuitableforMediation.
AssuchweknowthatthereductionsinCRSserviceoutputhavetheconsequencethatvulnerableCanberranswillnothaveaccesstothespecializeddisputeresolutionsupporttheyneed,andthatthiswillhavesignificantnegativeimpactsonthempersonallyandanadverseimpactonthebroaderCanberracommunity.
Putsimply,webelievethatCanberrahasacriticalneedforcommunitydisputeresolutionservicesoperatingatthelevelsprovidedbyCRSoverthepastyearsandalsoathigherlevels.
Furthertothis,theCRSBoardisveryconcernedthattherecentreductionswillsignificantlyrestrictthecapacityofCRStoprogresswithcriticalorganisationalandservicedevelopmentprojects.Thisisespeciallyimpactedbythefactthatnowallstaff,includingtheCEOandPracticeManger,arenowoperatingonaparttimebasis.Theseprojectsarevitalinunlockingexistingconstraintsandallowingtheorganisationtoinnovate,manageimmediaterisksandachievelongtermsustainability.
CASEEXAMPLES–LISTENINGTOTHEVOICESOFCRSCLIENTS
ThefollowingthreestoriesprovideapowerfulinsightintovalueofcommunitydisputeresolutionservicesintheCanberracommunityandhighlighttherelatedbenefitstoindividuals,familiesandtotheGovernmentthroughensuringthepreventionoffamilyviolenceandtheresolutionofconflictoutsidetheadversarialcontextoftheCourtsandlegalsystem.Allidentifyinginformationinthesecaseexampleshavebeenremovedorchanged.
CASEEXAMPLE1)PREVENTIONOFFAMILYVIOENCEANDBUILDINGCAPACITYFORCONFLICTRESOLUTON
InAugust2015IaccessedtheservicesofCRSforsupportwithaconflictIwashavinginmylife.IhadleftatoxicrelationshipwhilepregnantandhadtakenoutaDVOonmyex-partner.InDecemberwhenmydaughterwasafewmonthsold,myex-partnerandIattendedmediation.IthadbeenalongtimesinceIhadseenmyex-partnerandIwasveryscaredandnervousaboutmediation.ThewonderfulstaffatCRSmademefeelverycomfortableandthemediationprocesswasverypleasantandsuccessful.
InMarch2016,ex-partnerandImadeanattemptatgettingbacktogether.Withinafewmonths,wehadbrokenupandwerehavingserioustroubles.WereturnedtomediationinOctober2016andhadasuccessfuloutcome,andhavesincehadagreatco-parentingrelationship.
ThroughthesupportofCRSIwasabletofeelconfidentwiththeco-parentingrelationshipIhavewithmyex-partner,andhavelearnedhowtoapproachanddealwithconflict.Myex-partnerandIhavebeenabletochangeourparentingagreementwhennecessary,andhavelearnedhowtocompromisebecauseofwhatwelearnedduringthemediationprocessatCRS.
IamgratefulforthesupportIreceivedfromCRSasitpreventedfamilyviolence,andhasensuredmydaughterwillhaveahealthyandmeaningfulrelationshipwithbothparents.
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
6 | Page
AssomeonewhohasbenefitedfromtheavailabilityofthissupportserviceinCanberra,IstronglyencouragetheACTGovernmentdowhatevereveritcantoensureCRSisabletocontinueprovidingitsservicestomoreandmorepeople.
IamgratefulforthepastinvestmentintoCRS,andIthankyouinadvanceforyourconsiderationofmylettertoyou,andtheongoingneedsofthisvaluableCanberracommunityorganisation.
CASEEXAMPLE2)JOURNEYINGTOWARDSCO-PARENTING-COMMUNITYMEDIATIONSERVICES
SeanandMyerhadlivedtogetherfor3yearsandhadbecomeparentsofalittleboy,Michael,whowas18monthsoldwhentheyseparated.Myerwasfromalargeclose-knitfamilysoshemovedintothestreetwhereherparentsandhersisterandherfamilyalllived.Seanworkedshift-workandhisrosterwasalwayschangingsoitwasverydifficulttohavearoutineofMichael’stimewithhisfather.SeancontactedCRStorequestmediationwithTinainthehopethattheycouldfindacivilwayofcommunicatingregardinghistimewithhisson.
MyerfoundSeantobeveryaggressivewhenheapproachedherrequestingtoseeMichael.Thisinturnhadtheresultofavoidinghiscallsandface-to-facecontact.ThisavoidancehadthenresultedinSeanbecomingmorefrustratedandhewasfindingitincreasinglydifficulttomanagehisemotionalresponses.SeancalledtheIntaketeamonseveraloccasionsseekingcoachingonhowtorespondtoaparticularsituationwithMyer.
FollowingtheirIntakeinterviews,SeanandMyercametogetherfortheirmediation.TheywereabletoagreethattheywouldworktogetherinthebestinterestsofMichaelandthattheywouldeachsupporttherelationshipoftheotherparentwithhim.Theymadeacommitmenttocommunicaterespectfullyandthedetailsofhowitwouldoccurwereagreeduponandwrittenup.Theyalsoagreedtobothseeachildpsychologistregardingappropriatecareofsuchayoungchild.
CASEEXAMPLE3)FROMFAMILYCRISISTOFAMILYRESILIENCE, –YOUTHCRISISMEDIATIONSERVICE
15yearoldJanewasfromaculturallyandlinguisticallydiversefamilyandwasrepresentativeofanumberofFamilyTreeHouse(FTH)CALDclientswhobecameparticipantsinthisprogramoverthelastyear.Jane’smothercontactedtheFTHinthefirstinstanceasJanehadrunawaytwiceintheprevioustwoweeks.EventhoughJanehadreturnedhome,herangerwasupsettingthewholehousehold.Janehadbecomeviolentinthehouseholdandhaddestroyedproperty.Inresponse,theparentshadconfiscatedallelectronicdevicesandtheyhadrefusedpermissionforhertoparticipateintheout-of-schoolactivitiesthatsheobviouslyenjoyed.TheparentsbelievedthatifJanedidnotgetwhatshewanted,shewouldthrowatempertantrum.TheywereworriedthatJanemighthaveamentalillness.
BoththeparentsandJaneattendedtheirinitialIntakeinterviewsandproceededtoreceiveconflictcoachingover6sessionseachduringthenextcoupleofmonths.Duringthistime,Janerevealedthatherparentswereextremelyauthoritarianandhadveryhighexpectationsofherpersonalbehaviourandherschoolresults.Shewasaverybrightgirlandexpresseddeepinterestinhistory,literatureanddance.Shewaspreparedtoliveoutofhomeifnecessarytoescapewhatshesawasherparentssuffocatingauthority.
Theparents,throughcoaching,wereabletomodifysomeoftheircommunicationwithJanetotheextentthatJanerecognisedthattheyweremakinghugeefforts.Thethreefamilymembersparticipatedinafamilymeetingandwereabletomakesomeagreementsaboutexpectations.TheycontinuetobecontactedbytheFTHforongoingsupport.
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
7 | Page
WHYCONTINUETOINVEST?
ALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONWORKS:ITCANDELIVERBETTEROUTCOMESFORINDIVIDUALSINVOLVEDINTHESEPROCESSESTHANTRADITIONALJUSTICEMODELS
AlternativedisputeresolutionisnowastandardpracticeacrossAustraliaandisrecognisedasaneffectiveandusefulmethodologyforresolvingdisputes.iiiivThesemethodsarenowbeingemployedoutsidecriminaljusticesettings,inareasincludingchildprotection,vfamilyanddomesticviolenceviandelderabuseviiwithverypromisingresultsinrelationtoresolvingconflictandaddressingharms.
ALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONISACOSTEFFECTIVEWAYTORESOLVEDISPUTES
Thereisglobalrecognitionoftheeffectivenessofalternativedisputeresolutionasacosteffectivealternativetolitigation.Thesesavingscanrangefrom3to50percentofthecostsincurredbyfirmsthatgothroughacourtlitigationprocess.viiiAVictorianParliamentaryReviewin2007identifiedakeybenefittoalternativedisputeresolutioniscostandtimesavings.ixForfurtherCostBenefitAnalysisevidenceseeAttachmentA:“EconomicresearchrelevanttotheeconomicvalueoftheCanberraConflictResolutionServiceInc’sdisputeresolutionandtheeconomicimpactofareductioninservice”(preparedbyProfessorAnneDaly,UniversityofCanberra).
THEACTMODELOFCOMMUNITYLEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONCONTINUESTOBEINNOVATIVEANDANEXAMPLEOFBESTPRACTICE
Sincethelate1980’s,theACThasledAustraliainitssupportofcommunitybasedalternativedisputeresolution.WhileotherjurisdictionshavegenerallyfundedservicesthathavebeenembeddedinGovernmentdepartmentsorattachedtothelegalprofession(forexamplecommunitylegalcentresorLegalAid),theACThasfundedanindependentorganisationtoleadthiswork.Therearespecificstrengthsinthismodel,particularlyinreducingtheopportunityforconflictbetweenalternativeprocessesandlitigation.xThenationalmediationconference(www.mediationconference.com.au)tobeheldinCanberrain2019providesanopportunitytoshowcasetheuniqueapproachtheACTtakestoalternativedisputeresolutionandhowtheACTcontinuestobeinnovativeinthewayitdeliverscommunitycentredandownedservices.
THEACTGOVERNMENTHASCOMMITTEDTOBECOMINGARESTORATIVECOMMUNITY
Inearly2016,theACTLegislativeAssemblycommittedtoworktowardsthedeclarationasarestorativecity.xiWorkhascommencedaroundthis,includinganinquirybytheLawReformAdvisoryCommittee.xiiThereisalsoaneedtosupportcommunityledpracticeinthisarea.CRSisproudofitslonghistoryasacommunitybasedleaderinrestoringrelationshipsfollowingconflictandtheexperienceofharm.CRSbelievesthatakeycomponentofCanberraasaRestorativeCityisensuringthepopulationhasaccesstocommunitydisputeresolutionservices.AppropriatelevelsofGovernmentinvestmenttoensurethatdemandforcommunitydisputeresolutionservicescanbemetisacriticalaspectofthevisionforCanberraasaRestorativeCity.
THEREISGROWINGEVIDENCEREGARDINGTHEUSEFULNESSOFALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONPROCESSESANDRESTORATIVEPRACTICEINSOLVINGCOMPLEXSOCIALISSUES
Evidencesuggestsanumberofsignificantopportunitiesaroundrestorativepracticesthatsitoutsidethejusticesystem,including:
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
8 | Page
ELDERABUSE:Withanageingpopulationtherisksforexploitationofolderpeopleisbecominganincreasingproblem.TheQueenslandGovernmentistrainingtheuseofmediationandrestorativepracticeinthisarea,withpromisingresults.xiiiVictorianagencieshavedevelopedmediationmodelsthatareabletopreventelderabuse.xivWiththeroll-outofsignificantreformsinagedcare,particularlyfocusedonclientcentredcareandindividualfundingmodels,xvtherewillbeanincreaseinfamilybaseddisputesandaheightenedriskofelderabuse.ThereisasignificantopportunitytodevelopandimplementmodelstosupporttheACTcommunityandcomplementthegoodworkthathasoccurredtodatetoaddressandreduceelderabuse.
DISABILITY:consumers,advocatesandthecommunityhavewelcomedtheroll-outoftheNationalDisabilityInsuranceScheme.Evenasthisisthecase,therehavebeenchallengeswithitsimplementation.Whiledataisdifficulttoobtain,therehavebeenmanyexperiencessharedregardingtheconflictanddisputesthathaveariseninregardtoassessmentsandthedevelopmentofplans,relationshipsbetweenpartiesinvolvedinplans,andwithinfamilieswhoarenavigatingthiscomplexarrangement.Inthecontextofdevelopingadisabilityjusticestrategy,thereareopportunitiestoexplorehowrestorativepracticeandalternativedisputeresolutionprocessescanbeacorepartofthestrategyandplan.
FAMILYANDDOMESTICVIOLENCE:whilegoodworkisoccurringaroundtheuseofrestorativejusticeforthoseengagedinthejusticesystem,thereispromisingpracticeemergingaroundtheuseofmediationandrestorativepracticetosupportvictimsoffamilyanddomesticviolencewhoareunableorunwillingtoengageinthecriminaljusticesystem.BuildingonworkinNewZealandarounditsvalueintheareaofsexualassault,xviAustralianresearchhassuggestedthatcarefullydesignedalternativeresolutionprocessesmaydelivermoresatisfactoryoutcomesforsomevictimsofdomesticandfamilyviolence.xviiModelssuchastheRoundTableDisputeManagementprocessusedatLegalAidVictoria,andtheTelephoneDisputeResolutionServiceoperatedbyRelationshipsAustraliahavebeenidentifiedasgoodpractice.Inaddition,approachessuchasintroducingaspecialistmodelofmediationforfamilyviolencematterswhichdeliversamoreintegratedandco-ordinatedapproachusingprofessionalsfromarangeofdisciplinebackgrounds.xviiiThispromisingpracticesuggeststhatthisisanimportantissuetoexploreastheACTGovernmentdevelopsandimplementsitsstrategytoreducedomesticandfamilyviolenceinourcommunity.
OUT-OF-HOMECARE:GiventheworkthathasoccurredinNSWwithregardtotheuseofmediationandrestorativepracticeintheareaofchildprotectionisdeliveringpromisingresults,itwouldbeusefultoexploreitspotentialastheACTGovernmentcontinuestoimplementthenewapproachtoout-of-homecareservices,asoutlinedinAStepUpforOurKids:theout-of-homecarestrategy2015-2020.xix
SCHOOLS:WiththereleaseofSchoolsforAllbytheExpertPanelonstudentswithcomplexneedsandchallengingbehaviour,itwasnotedthatthereistheneedtosupportschoolwidepositivebehaviour.Restorativepracticeshavebeenidentifiedasakeywaythatthismayoccur.xx
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
9 | Page
WHYSHOULDGOVERNMENTINCREASEFUNDING?
DEMANDISINCREASINGANDHASOUTSTRIPPEDANYINCREASEINFUNDINGLEVELS
CRShaskeptverydetaileddatainrelationtoitsservicedeliveryforthepastfifteenyears.Ananalysisofthisdatademonstratesclearlythattherehasbeenasignificantincreaseinworkloadoveraten-yearperiodto2015,clientnumbershavealmostdoubledovertheperiod,from1320clientsto2552clients.CRShasanalysedtheoccasionsofserviceprovidedtothecommunityoveraten-yearperiodtoidentifytrendsandissuesagainsttheincreasestofunding.Itrevealsthatoccasionsofservicehasincreasedbyafactorof4.6.Thisisagainstanincreasedfundingthatstandsatonlyafactorof2.7.CRSalsorecordstheamountoftimespentwithclients,togainapictureoftheneedsofclientsandwherestaffarefocusingtheireffort.ContactandoutputfromCRShascontinuedtogrow,andisnowalmosttentimesthelevelitwastenyearsago.Thisisagainstanincreaseofrevenuefortheorganisationofonly2.7timesoverthesameperiod.Thisdemonstratesthattheoutputoftheorganisationhassignificantlyoutstrippedanyfundingincreases.Theleveloftimerequiredalsopointstoanincreaseincomplexitywhichisexploredingreaterbelow.
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1000030000500007000090000110000130000150000170000190000210000
Timespentwithclientscomparedwithrevenueincreases
Timewithclients(minutes) TotalRevenue
SERV
ICEDE
LIVE
RY
CRSholdsdetaileddataon15yearsofservicedelivery
CLIENTNUMBE
RS
Clientnumbershavedoubledfrom1320to2552overtenyears CLIENTCO
NTA
CT
Leveloftimespentwithclientshasincreased ashascomplexityinclientcases
DEMAN
DVS
FUNDS
MismatchofDemand(OccassionsofServicex4.7)VsInvestment(Fundingx2.7)
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
10 | Page
COMPLEXITYINCASESISINCREASINGANDRESOLUTIONREQUIRESMORETIMEANDRESOURCES
Itisunsurprisingthatthenatureofconflictsanddisputeswillchangeovertime.Liketherestofthecommunityservicessector,thereisevidenceemergingaroundincreasingcomplexityinissuesandcases.WhileCRSisnotatherapeuticservice,itisimportantthatweworkcloselywithotheragenciestoputinplacesupportsthatenablepartiestoworktoresolvedisputes.CRSendeavourstoestablishlinkswithotheragenciestoachievelastingoutcomesforclients.Thisjoined-upapproachwhilecriticalispartofthecomplexityweexperienceasreferredtoabove.Thechartbelowprovidesinformationregardingwherethemajorityofreferralscomefrom,overtheselectedperiods2011/2012,2012/2013and2015/2016.WhilereferralsfromSupportlink(ACTPolicing)continuestoprovidethemostreferrals,otherreferralpathwayshaveshiftedquitesignificantly.Electronicreferralsthroughthewebsitearenowaprimarychannelforinitialengagementwiththeservice.Inaddition,whilesomegovernmentagenciessuchasCanberraConnect(AccessCanberra),HousingACT,CareandProtectionandtheChildren,YouthandFamilyGatewayareemergingaskeyreferralagencies,thereisareductioninotheragenciessuchasACTPlanningandLandAuthorityandmunicipalservicesareas.
Thissuggestscomplexityinthatthereisashiftawayfrommorestraightforwardissuessuchasneighbourhooddisputestomorecomplexrelationshipandfamilyissues.
050
100150200250300350400
TheChangingNatureofReferralstoCRS
2011/2012 2012/2013 2015/2016
Over10yearstherehasbeenashiftawayfromstraightforwardissues (neighbourhooddisputes)
Increasingtrendinprovidingresolutionservicesfordomesticandfamilyviolenceissues
Complexityofcasesisincreasingwithrelationshipandfamilyissuesincreasingfrom14casesin2011-12to985casesin2015-16)
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
11 | Page
MorestrikingisananalysisoftheagencieswhoengagewithCRStosupporttheirworkwithclients,whichalsodemonstratestheincreasingcomplexityofcases.Asoutlinedbelow,therehasbeenasignificantshiftoverafive-yearperiodtoissuesrelatingtorelationshipandfamilyissues.Forexample,referralstotheFamilyRelationshipadvicelineandwebsitehasjumpedfrom14in2011/2012toanastonishing985in2015/2016.ThereisanincreasingtrendaroundissuessuchasdomesticandfamilyviolenceexemplifiedbyacomparisonofreferralstotheDomesticViolenceCrisisServicewhichhasrisenfrom13in2011/12to69in2015/16.ThereareclearlystronglinkstotheworkofCRSandthebroaderACTGovernmentcommitmenttoreducedomesticandfamilyviolence.Thisisanareathatrequiresfurtherinvestigationandresourcing.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
SelectedReferralsfromCRStootherAgencies
2011/2012 2012/2013 2014/2015
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
12 | Page
METHODOLOGIESAREEVOLVINGANDENGAGEMENTISLESSLIKELYTORESULTINFORMALMEDIATION
CRSisaservicethatisevolving,inlinewithcommunityneedandclientexpectations.Mediationcontinuestobeanimportantelementoftheserviceoffering,buttheorganisationisintroducingothermethodsthatfocusparticularlyonearlyinterventionandinformalresolutionofdisputesandconflicts.Assuchthereisasmallreductioninmattersthatareproceedingtoformalmediation.Giventhatmediationisoneoftheserviceswherethereisaclientfeeforservice,ifthistrendcontinues(asitisexpectedto),itwillimpactonthefinancialperformanceoftheorganisation.Thechartbelowmapstheincreasesinthenumberofmediationsthatactuallyoccurred–whichhasremainedconsistentwholeenquirieshaveincreasedsignificantly.Itshouldbenotedthatsuccessinmediationoutcomeshasremainedhigh,andinfacthasincreasedinrecentyears,sittingatover90%.
Whiletheactualnumberofmediationsconductedannuallyhavereducedslightlyovertime(asdistinctfromtheproportion),theengagementofclientsinconflictcoachinghasdoubledoverthelastthreeyears.Therehasalsobeenashiftintimespentonmediationandclientcoachingovertime,demonstratingthatconflictcoachingisgrowinginsignificance.
0100200300400500600700800900
1000110012001300
TenYearTrendformediation
Disputessuitableformediation AcceptsMediation MediationSessions
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
2013/2014
2014/2015
2015/2016
Shiftsinservicedeliverymodelforalternativedisputeresolution- numberofcases
MediationSessionLogRecords ClientCoachingLogRecords
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
13 | Page
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
2013/2014
2014/2015
2015/2016
ShiftinServiceModelRegardingAlternativeDisputeResolution- TimewithClients
MediationSessionMinuteswithClient ClientCoachingMinuteswithClient
Over1
0Years
Hasseentheemergenceofnewmethodssuchasearlyinterventionandinformalresolutionofdisputesandconflict O
ver1
0Years
Thesuccessinmediationoutcomeshasincreasedtoover90%
Over1
0Years
Theengagementofclientsinconflictcoachinghasdoubledinrecentyearscausingashiftintimespentwithclients.
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
14 | Page
THETRENDSOUTLINEDABOVEAREADVERSELYIMPACTINGONCRS’OPERATIONALCAPACITY
Theanalysisoutlinedabovedemonstratesasignificantincreaseindemandforservices,andoutputbytheorganisationtorespondtothisneed.Thishashadanumberofimpactstotheoperationsoftheorganisation.Theyincludethefollowing:
§ CRSISATCAPACITYINRELATIONTORESPONDINGTOREQUESTS:Theinformationprovidedabovedemonstratesthesignificantincreaseinserviceprovisionoverthelasttenyearswhichhasnotbeenalignedwithfunding.AsCRShasstruggledtomeetdemand,ithasshiftedresourcesfrominfrastructureandadministrationintofrontlineserviceprovision.Thisisastrategythatcanonlybemaintainedinplaceforashortperiodandtheoperationalinfrastructureoftheorganisationnowrequiressignificantinvestment.IthasalsomeantthatCRShasreacheditscapacityinrelationtorespondingtoissuesandcommunitycontacts.Theserviceisatthepointwhereminimalmarketingorpromotionoccursastheorganisationwouldnotbeabletorespondtoanyincreaseindemand.Atthistime,CRSiskeenlyawarethatthereisunmetdemandinsectionsofthecommunitybuttheservicecannotrespondduetocapacityrestraints.ThissituationhasbeenfurtherimpactedbynecessaryreductionsinstaffingimplementedinAugust2017,whichhaveresultedintheneedtosignificantlyreduceservicedeliveryoutputs.
§ CRSISUNABLETOAFFORDTOBELOCATEDINPREMISESTHATAREFITFORPURPOSE:PhysicalconstraintssuchaslimitedprivatespacemeansthatCRSisunabletoholdshuttlemediationsessions(astandardmethodofmediation)ormorethanasinglemediationsessionatonetime.Aswellasbeingabletorespondtocommunityneed,thisresultsinanunder-utilisationoftrainedandaccreditedmediatorsandmeansCRSisunabletodeveloponeoftheareasofthebusinessthatcouldbecomplementedbyuserfees.Inaddition,thecurrentprogramsarelocatedovertwofloorsofthepremisesandcreatesignificantinefficienciesandrisksforthemanagementofstaffoftheorganisation.OverthepastsevenyearsCRShasexhaustedallavenuestosecuremoreappropriatetenancyarrangementsattheGriffinCentre.Withtheaboveissuesinmind,andalsotheneedfordedicatedtrainingspace,CRSneedstotransitiontofitforpurposetenancyarrangements.
§ CRSHASHADLIMITEDOPPORTUNITYTOUNDERTAKEESSENTIALWORKSUCHASEXPLORINGNEWOPPORTUNITIES,DIVERSIFYINGSERVICEMODELSANDDEVELOPINGDIVERSEREVENUESOURCES:TheemphasisthatCRShasplacedonrespondingtocommunityneedhasresultedinlimitedopportunitytoinvestinbusinessdevelopmentactivities.Thisisnowanurgenttaskfortheorganisation,withtheneedtounlockthepotentialtobuildonthesuccessoftheorganisationtodatetobuildongoingsustainablebusinessmodels.CRShasmanyavenuestodevelopbusinesspartnershipswithindustryassociations,businesses,tertiaryinstitutions,andgovernmentdepartments,howeverthecurrentsignificantconstraintsmakesuchbusinessdevelopmentimpossible.CRSalsoisideallyplacedtobethecommunityhubforRestorativePracticesandrelatedprofessionaltrainingandcommunityeducation.
CRShasreacheditscapacityinrelationtorespondingtoissuesandcommunitycontacts
CRSfacesunmetdemandinsectionsofthecommunitybuttheservicecannotrespondduetocapacityrestraints
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
15 | Page
CRSPROPOSALFORADDITIONALFUNDING
CRSisseekingadditionalfundingof$300,000inthe2018/19financialyeartoinvestinfourkeyinitiativesthatwillhelptoensureitcanmeetdemand,andachieveongoingviabilityandsustainability.
RESTORESTAFFINGBACKTOPRE2017/18LEVELSTOMEETDEMAND($100,000)
AsalreadyoutlinedaboveCRShashadnootheroptionbuttoreducestaffingandthishashadtheeffectofreducingservicedeliveryoutput.Thesereductionswillprovideabalancedbudgetinthe2017/18financialyear,howevertheyalsomeanCRScannotmeetthebasicdemandforitsservices.CRShasalsoinvestedsignificantlyoverthepast12monthsonimprovingitsadministrativeandgovernancepractices.Thishasincludedrenewingitsinternalfinancialandadministrativesystems,re-writingitsConstitution,recruitingnewBoardmembersandgainingACNCregistrationasaCharitablePublicBenevolentInstitutionwithDGRstatus.ItisevidentalreadytotheCRSBoardandStaffthatthestaffingandrelatedservicedeliveryreductionsarenotanacceptablecourseofactionduetothenegativeimpactonvulnerableclients,andtherestrictionsitplacesonfutureorganisationaldevelopmentbyhavingallstaff,includingmanagement,operatingonaparttimebasis.$100,000willaddresstheincreasedcostofdeliveringservicesthathaveimpactedCRSinanincrementalwayoverthepasttenyears,andenabletheorganisationtorestoreitsstaffingbacktotheminimumrequiredtomeetbasicdemand.
UPGRADEOFFACILITIESATTHEGRFFINCENTRE($15,000)
Thecurrentpremisesareinadequateforthecurrentandfutureneedsoftheserviceandhaveanumberoflimitationswhicharenotpossibletomaintaininthemediumterm.AkeyissueisthedistributionofstaffandprogramsovertwofloorsoftheGriffinCentrewhichcreatesdisjointedserviceprovision,hampersadequatesupervisionandstaffsupportandcreatesadditionalriskfortheorganisationintheneedtomanagemultipleworkenvironments.Inaddition,thereisalackofaccesstoprivatespacesandenvironmentsneededtodeliveralternativedisputeresolutionservices.Thisfundingwillassistwithofficerelocationcoststoimproveofficearrangementsacrossthecurrenttenancyatlevels2and3attheGriffinCentre.Thisisaviabletemporarysolutionfortheshorttermwhileothertenancylocationsareinvestigatedforthefuture.
ADDITIONALINVESTMENTINADMINISTRATIVEANDORGANIZATIONALINFRASTRUCTUREANDTECHNOLOGY($50,000)
LikemanyorganisationsCRShasdivertedfundingfromadministrationandinfrastructureintofrontlineservicedeliveryasdemandhasincreased.Whiletheorganisationhasbeenabletodothisforashortperiod,itisnotasustainablemodelmovingintothefutureandisemergingasasignificantriskaroundtheorganisation’sviability.Giventhesignificantchangesinthelocalcommunitysector,itisimperativethatCRSinvestsinappropriateadministrativeandoperationalresourcestoensurethatitcontinuestobeaprofessionalandbestpracticeorganisation.Thisadditionalfundingwouldenable:
Investinginnewoperationalsystemsthatcansupportthesubstantialincreaseinenquires,intakeandassessmentprocesses(includingthemigrationanddevelopmentofanewdata-basesystem);
Increasinginvestmenttoensureadequateadministrativefunctionsareinplacetomanageanorganisationwithahighvolumeofclientcontact;and
Strengtheninggovernance,riskandcomplianceactivitiesfortheorganisation.
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
16 | Page
INVESTINGINDEVELOPMENTACTIVITIESTODEVELOPASUSTAINABLEBUSINESSMODELINTOTHEFUTURE($70,000)
Asoutlinedabove,theneedtothefocusonfrontlineserviceshasseenCRSunabletoadequatelyfocusonbusinessdevelopmentactivities.CRSiswellawareofthemanyavenuestodevelopbusinesspartnershipswithindustryassociations,businesses,tertiaryinstitutions,andgovernmentdepartments,buthavebeenunabletoinvesttheappropriateresourcestoenablebusinessplanningtooccur.Withoutinvestmentintheimmediatefuture,theongoingviabilityoftheorganisationwillbeatsignificantrisk.TherecentworkthatCRShasundertakentoenableittodevelopcorporatebusinessrelationships,establishPBICharitablestatusandattractdonationsrequiresongoingfocusandinvestmenttopursueopportunitiesanddeveloprelationshipsandpartnerships.Assuch,theorganisationwillinvestadditionalfundsto:
Developacomprehensivebusinessplan,whichsetstargetsandmilestonestosupportthedevelopmentofCRSasasustainableandviableorganisationinthemediumterm;
Pursuearangeofagreementsandrelationshipswithindustrybodiesandinstitutionsinareassuchastheconstructionandbuildingindustry,andtertiaryandvocationaleducationsectors;
Developitscapacityinfundraisingandattractingphilanthropicsupport;and PursueopportunitiestodevelopCRSasaprofessionaltrainingandcommunityeducationhubinrelationto
alternativedisputeresolutionprocessesandrestorativepractices.
LEADINGTHECOMMUNITYRESPONSETORESTORATIVEPRACTICE($75,000)
ThereisarealopportunityfortheACTGovernmenttosupportthecommunityasitworkstowardsthedeclarationofCanberraasarestorativecity.WhiletherehasbeensignificantprogressindevelopingacommunityofpracticearoundrestorativejusticeandpracticeintheACT,therearestillsignificantopportunitiestoembedrestorativepracticeacrossthecommunity,expandingthelearningsfromthejusticesystemintoareasofconcerninourlocalcommunity.Withthisadditionalinvestment,CRSwillmovetointroduceanumberofthefollowinginitiatives:§ ELDERABUSE:introducingacommunitybasedmediationandrestorativemodel,basedontheVictorianmodelfor
membersofthecommunityworkingtoresolvedisputesandpreventelderabuseinaperiodofchange;§ DISABILITY:introducingacommunitybasedmediationandrestorativepracticemodeltargetedtosupporting
peoplewithdisability,theircarersandfamiliesastheynegotiatetheNDIS;§ DOMESTICANDFAMILYVIOLENCE:refiningCRS’responsetovictimsimpactedbydomesticandfamilyviolence
andworkwithexpertstoexploretheintroductionofrestorativepracticeforvictimshesitanttoengagewiththecriminaljusticesystem;
§ CHILDPROTECTIONANDOUT-OF-HOMECARE:workwithserviceproviders,carersandfamiliestoinvestigateuseofrestorativepracticewithintheout-of-homecaresystem;
§ SCHOOLS:buildingonthestrongbasewithinACTschoolsectors,andthepriorityincreatingsupportiveschoolenvironmentswiththereleaseofSchoolsforall,worktosupporttheeducationsectortoincreasetheuseofrestorativepractice.
Assuch,aninvestmentof$75,00wouldbeusedtoenableCRSto:
Employanexpertincommunitybasedrestorativepractice,tosupportCRStodeveloptheirmethodologies,servicemodelandpracticeinrelationtorestorativepractice;
EngageasaleaderintheprocessofsupportingtheACTtobecomearestorativecommunity,focusingonunlockingthepotentialofcommunitybasedrestorativepractice;and
Exploretheopportunitiestodevelopleadingpracticeintheareasoutlinedabove.
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
17 | Page
CONCLUSION
ThisisapivotalpointintimeforCRS.Afteraperiodofsignificantgrowthinrelationtodemandandactivity,itisnowtimetoreflectontheelementsrequiredtoensurethattheorganisationcontinuesandthrivesinaverydifferentfundingenvironment.Withmodestinvestment,theorganisationwillbeabletocontinuetodeliverhighqualityandaccessiblealternativedisputeresolutionservicesandmakeasignificantcontributiontotheACT’saspirationtobecomearestorativecommunity.Welookforwardtoexploringtheseopportunitieswithkeydecisionmakersandpolicymakers.
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
18 | Page
ENDNOTES
iForexample,see• https://www.qld.gov.au/law/legal-mediation-and-justice-of-the-peace• https://www.disputes.vic.gov.au/contact-us• http://www.courts.justice.nsw.gov.au/Pages/cats/catscorporate_adrdirectorate/catscorporate_adrdirectorate
.aspxiiKeyfactorsthathavedriventhistransformationhaveincluded:
• reformwithinarangeofsubsectors,mostnotablyindisabilityandagedcaresectors;• areductioninCommonwealthresources,inareasincludingcommunitylegalservicesandthespecialist
homelessnessservices;and• increasedexpectationsaroundgovernanceandregulations,includingtheintroductionoftheAustralian
CharitiesandNot-for-ProfitCommission,andanumberofsub-sectorregulatorybodies.iiiKathyMack.2003.CourtReferralToADR:CriteriaAndResearch.AustralianInstituteofJudicialAdministrationIncorporatedandtheNationalDisputeResolutionAdvisoryCouncil.ivNationalAlternativeDisputeResolutionCouncil.2012.YourGuidetoDisputeResolutionAustralianAttorneyGeneralsDepartmentCanberra.vAnthonyMorgan,HayleyBoxall,KiptooTerer,DrNathanHarris.2012.EvaluationofalternativedisputeresolutioninitiativesinthecareandprotectionjurisdictionoftheNSWChildren’sCourt.ResearchandPublicPolicySeries118.InstituteofCriminology.Canberra.viField,Rachael.2010.FDRandvictimsoffamilyviolence:Ensuringasafeprocessandoutcomes.AustralasianDisputeResolutionJournal,21(3),pp.185-193.viiDepartmentofJusticeandAttorneyGeneral.2016.SupportedElderMediationDiscussionPaper.QueenslandGovernment.viiiInessaLove.2011.SettlingOutofCourt:LoveHowEffectiveIsAlternativeDisputeResolution?Viewpoint:publicpolicyfortheprivatesector.Note329.http://siteresources.worldbank.org/FINANCIALSECTOR/Resources/282044-1307652042357/VP329-Setting-out-of-court.pdf(AccessedNov2016).ixVictorianParliamentLawReformCommittee.2007.AlternativeDisputeResolutionDiscussionPaper.http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/committees/lawrefrom/alternate_dispute/Discussion_paper.pdf(AccessedNov2016).xDrLolaAkinOjelabi,2010.ImprovingAccesstoJusticeThroughAlternativeDisputeResolution:theRoleofCommunityLegalCentresinVictoria,Australia.ResearchReport,FacultyofLawandManagement,LaTrobeUniversity.xiMsPorteretal.OpCit.xiiACTLawReformAdvisoryCommittee.2016CurrentInquires.Accessibleathttp://www.justice.act.gov.au/page/view/565/title/current-inquiries(AccessedOct2017).xiiiDepartmentofJusticeandAttorneyGeneral.2016.SupportedElderMediationDiscussionPaper.QueenslandGovernment.xivThemediationmodeldevelopedbyFamilyMediationCentreisdemonstratedthroughtheircasestudiesandcanbeaccessedviatheirwebsite:http://www.mediation.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/SCR-Case-Studies-A4Portrait_updated.pdf(AccessedNo2016).xvReformprocessesandimplementationcanbeaccessedviatheHealthDepartment’swebsite:https://agedcare.health.gov.au/aged-care-reform(AccessedNov2016).xviShirleyJülichetal.2010.ProjectRestoreAnExploratoryStudyofRestorativeJusticeandSexualViolence.http://rpe.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/The_Project_Restore_Report.pdfxviiField,Rachael.2010.FDRandvictimsoffamilyviolence:Ensuringasafeprocessandoutcomes.AustralasianDisputeResolutionJournal,21(3),pp.185-193.xviiiIbid.
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
19 | Page
xixACTGovernment.2015.AStepUpforOurKids:theout-of-homecarestrategy2015-2020.Accessibleathttp://www.communityservices.act.gov.au/ocyfs/out-of-home-care-strategy-2015-2020/out-of-home-care-strategy-2015-2020(AccessedNov2016).xxMsPorteretal.OpCit.
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
20 | Page
ATTACHMENTA–THEECONOMICIMPACTOFAREDUCTIONINCRSSERVICES
Economic research relevant to the economic value of the Canberra Conflict Resolution Service Inc’s dispute resolution and the economic impact of a reduction in service
Professor Anne Daly University of Canberra
Greg Barrett Rhian Williams
Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution services have major economic impacts on communities. In recent years economic research, particularly Cost Benefit Analysis, has been used to quantify and value the extent by which the benefits of community mediation, exceed its costs. This research demonstrates that community mediation delivers substantial economic benefits exceeding its costs.
Valuing community mediation costs and benefits In Cost Benefit Analysis, a economic valuation framework is used to make complex reality tractable. The research summarised here is consistent with this rigorous economic framework. What are the benefits? Community mediation has significant economic benefits: • reduced costs for government (resources freed for their next best use), • more productive businesses (including more employment), • more productive community activities (including more employment), • better educational outcomes, • better health outcomes, and • better child protection outcomes. The settlement of community conflict, in the absence of community mediation, is a continuing process using significant economic resources. Settlement of conflicts, through community mediation, will free resources for other economic opportunities, increase the productivity of government, community and private resources, and provide major benefits to the wider community. Community mediation minimises the resources required for conflict resolution and makes both existing and new investments in the community more productive. Community mediation frees resources that would have been used in a court based dispute resolution. For example in NSW and Queensland it typically takes four and a half years to finalise common law workers’ compensation claims (Productivity Commission 2004:237). Community mediation dispute resolution is quicker and releases resources (of lawyers, courts, employers, insurance agents and disputants) for their next best use. Community mediation reduces the cost of policing, courts, prisons, health care, education, and other community services. Community mediation improves the productivity of disputants and their families. This increased output is a benefit to society. It derives from the faster return to work and better health outcomes from the reduced delays and more respectful treatment of disputants. This improved productivity extends to the disputant’s families through freeing family time and better educational outcomes for disputants’ children.
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
21 | Page
To produce these benefits, community mediation uses (in administration, mediation meetings & training) a set of resources (labour, materials, etc). These resources are therefore unavailable for other uses in society (ie they are included in cost benefit analysis as an opportunity cost to society). Cost Benefit Analysis uses these outcomes to value the net impact on a community’s economic wellbeing.
Decision criteria Cost Benefit Analysis values the impacts (costs and benefits) of community mediation in economic terms (ie impact on society’s wellbeing). These values are aggregated using a discount rate embodying society’s trade-off between current and future consumption. The discounted impacts are then compared using decision criteria. The findings of a Cost Benefit Analysis are commonly expressed by two decision criteria: • The benefit cost ratio takes the present value of total benefits and divides this by the present value of total costs. The ratio is useful for comparing the efficiency of programs across different program scales. A ratio greater than 1 demonstrates that there is a net economic benefit to society. • The Net Present Value (NPV) is the amount by which the present value of benefits exceeds the present value of costs. This is a good measure of the size of the economic impact. A positive NPV demonstrates that there is a net economic benefit to society.
Cost Benefit Analysis of mediation programs The literature on Cost Benefit Analysis of mediation programs finds considerable economic benefit (Morgan et al 2012:21). For example, CBA evaluations of the use of mediation in: • the Legal Aid Family Dispute Resolution Service found a B/C ratio of 1.5 and a NPV of $37 million (KPMG 2008), • Irish accident compensation mediation (Personal Injuries Assessment Board) produced a B/C ratio of 1.9 and an NPV of €27,703 per case Hogan (2006), • the Victorian Right People for Country Project found a B/C ratio of 3.8 and an NPV of $3.0 million (Daly & Barrett 2012), • Yuendumu found a B/C ratio of 4.3 and an NPV of $4.4 million (Daly & Barrett 2014), • the Accident Compensation Conciliation Service found a B/C ratio of 3.0 and an NPV of $916 million (Daly, Barrett & Williams 2016), and • Mornington Island found a B/C ratio of 10.6 and an NPV of $17.4 million (Daly & Barrett 2016). The economic literature clearly demonstrates that mediation has a substantial net economic benefit to community. Bibliography Daly A and Barrett G, (2012) ‘Economic Cost Benefit Analysis of the Right People for Country Project’ Canberra:
University of Canberra. Daly A and Barrett G, (2014) ‘Independent Cost Benefit Analysis of the Yuendumu Mediation and Justice Committee’
Alice Springs: Central Desert Regional Council. http://www.centraldesert.nt.gov.au/files/attachments/yuendumup_cba_0.pdf
Daly A & Barrett G, (2016) ‘Mornington Island Restorative Justice Program’ Mornington Island: Junkuri Laka Wellesley Islands Aboriginal Law, Justice and Governance Association Inc.
Daly A, Barrett G & Williams R, (2016) ‘Cost Benefit Analysis of the Accident Compensation Conciliation Service” Melbourne: Accident Compensation Conciliation Service.
Hogan, Vincent. (2006) A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board, Clonakilty: Injuries Board.
CONFLICTRESOLUTIONSERVICE:THECASEFORADDITIONALINVESTMENTFORCOMMUNITYBASEDALTERNATIVEDISPUTERESOLUTIONANDRESTORATIVESERVICES–2018/19ACTBUDGETSUBMISSION
22 | Page
KPMG (2008) Family dispute resolution services in Legal Aid commissions evaluation report. Canberra: Attorney
General’s Department. Morgan, Anthony & Boxall, Hayley & Terer, Kiptoo & Harris, Nathan (2012) Evaluation of Alternative Dispute
Resolution Initiatives in the Care and Protection Jurisdiction of the NSW Children's Court, Research and Public Policy Series No. 118, Australian Institute of Criminology, Griffith.
Productivity Commission. (2004) National Workers’ Compensation and Occupational Health and Safety Frameworks, Report No. 27, Canberra.