Transcript
Page 1: The Commodification of Net Art

From Browser to Gallery

(and Back):The

Commodification of Internet Art

Page 2: The Commodification of Net Art

Some ideas…Do as you would in the old days

1. Spatialization

2. Commissions

3. Commercialization

Monetize online

1. Just make the work

about money: Create

“alternative economies”

for work to exist in

2. Adapt to online shopping/virtual museum…etc.

Page 3: The Commodification of Net Art

Artie Vierkant, Monochrome Arc, 2010.

Page 4: The Commodification of Net Art

Ryan Trecartin, Any Ever, PS1, 2011.

Page 5: The Commodification of Net Art

Vuk Cosic, Documenta X, part of the exhibition Net-art per me at the Slovenian Pavilion of the Venice Biennial, 2001

Documenta X, Kassel, 1997

Page 6: The Commodification of Net Art

Oliver Laric, Kopienkritik, 2011. Skulpturhalle Basel

Page 7: The Commodification of Net Art

Postinternet Survival Guide from Survivaltips.tumblr.com, curated/compiled by Katja Novitska, 2010

Page 8: The Commodification of Net Art
Page 9: The Commodification of Net Art

Spatialization

Page 10: The Commodification of Net Art

Success in net art

• Winning a webbie award!

• Lots of traffic, Likes, Reblogs and sitehits?

• Mentioned on Rhizome, Furtherfield or VVork

• Klout score of over 50

• Winning Turner Prize• Interviews and good

reviews• Museum/festival

distribution• Gallery representation• Commissions. Art Fairs.• Nice documentary on

your life’s work• Your name in textbooks

Success in Contemporary Art

•Museum distribution•Going viral•Nice documentation•Net-famous but poor

Page 11: The Commodification of Net Art

Teo Spiller-Megatronix (1997)sold to Municipal Museum of

Ljubljana for 85000 SIT ($500 USD)

Image not available :[

Page 12: The Commodification of Net Art

Let’s talk about AURA• Linkrot and URLs on a unique domain name• Documentation of the internet exhibits

some “aura of the digital”, or “looks like it exhibited somewhere”

• Versions

Page 13: The Commodification of Net Art

Rafael Rozendaal 2011 www.artwebsitesalescontract.com

/Specifies sale by:- a disc with website, files and online content- five successive collectors-Rights to resell domain as long work is kept as a whole- transfer of domain name to collector

Page 14: The Commodification of Net Art

Commissions/SupportTurbulence.org

Rhizome

Daniel Langlois Foundation ($$$)

Whitney Museum Artport (gone)

TATE (gone)

Guggenheim (gone)

Walker Arts Center

Ars Electronica

Institute of Networked Cultures

Page 15: The Commodification of Net Art

http://www.numeral.com/eicon.html

John F. Simon, Every Icon (1997)

Given:

An icon described by a 32 X 32 grid.

Allowed:

Any element of the grid to be colored black or white.

Shown:

Every icon.

Page 16: The Commodification of Net Art

Eduardo Kacs, Genesis, Ars Electronica, 1999 /2001

Page 17: The Commodification of Net Art

Various platforms made just for selling the artz

• Art.sy (domain name change pending?)• VIP Artfair (just for collectors/dealers)• Art Micro Patronage (buy credit/membership

and pay for art)• S-editions by Rafael Rozendaal• Kickstarter• Deviantart.com• Artobjectculture.net (previously artobj-cult.biz)

Page 18: The Commodification of Net Art

LUCY CHINEN & EMILIE GERVAISARTOBJECTCULTURE.NET

http://artobjectculture.net/PastArtObjects/

Page 19: The Commodification of Net Art

“Our “art object tax” is a logistical term for making something more expensive because its art…We are playful with the idea of money and buying. Art commerce is a culture in itself.”

Artobjectculture.net 2012

Page 20: The Commodification of Net Art

“I prefer to use technology when it is mainstream, when everyone has it, because I want to reach a large audience. If you work with brand new tech your audience is limited.” Rafael Rozendaalhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2nKns9_fM8

Page 21: The Commodification of Net Art

Kim Asendorf & Ole FachGif Market 2011

http://www.gifmarket.net

Page 22: The Commodification of Net Art

Jonas Lund, thepaintshop.biz/, 2012

“The Paintshop Rank™ is calculating the price by analyzing a set of criteria, such as Artfacts ranking and Google Ranking of the author, the quality ranking in relation to the amount of views, the amount of Facebook likes and Tweets. The underlying assumption is that two general things matter for the price, the reputation of the artist and the popularity of the painting itself.”Jonas Lund, 2012

Page 23: The Commodification of Net Art

Commodity Critique!

http://history.etoy.com/

Page 24: The Commodification of Net Art

Conclusion• Emerging artists more willing to adapt work to

sell/exhibit in offline spaces• Nothing wrong with selling work. It’s time net

artists got some $$$ for free labor• Models that adhere to traditional art sales

processes are probably more problematic in an online environment

• I thought commodity critique was cool.• Sell stuff as long as you get to keep making it

the way you wanted it to be

Page 25: The Commodification of Net Art

“Hyperbranding”-Brad Troemel 2012

Everything you post can be seen as a performance contributing to a persona-as-brand on the internet!

So carefully curate your Facebook posts…

i.e. Man Bartlett, Petra Cortright, Ryder Ripps, Parker Ito, Netochka Nezvanova…etc.

Page 26: The Commodification of Net Art

Thanks for listening!• You can find the first manuscript of this article

on:

www.jennifer-chan.com

Pool Postinternet Critical http://pooool.info/• Ofluxo.net volume 1• [email protected]


Top Related