-
8/2/2019 The French Revolution at the End of the Cold War
1/2
The French Revolution at the end of the Cold War
Lynn Hunt
Revolutionary France, 1770-1880 by Franois Furet, translated by Antonia Nevill
Blackwell, 630 pp, 40.00, December 1992, ISBN 0 631 17029 4
In 1989, Franois Furet was frequently hailed (or criticised, depending on the
context) as the king of the Bicentenary of the French Revolution. He seemed to
be everywhere, on television, in the newspapers, and adorning the pages of
almost every glossy magazine. Foreign reporters featured him in pieces on the
celebration. Even his absence from the international scholarly meeting at the
Sorbonne in July of that year merited a comment in Le Monde. Furets elevationmarked the apparently definitive defeat of the Marxist interpretation as the
dominant paradigm in studies of the French Revolution, a defeat which coincided
with the collapse of Eastern bloc Communism. Historiography and world politics
seemed to reinforce each other in uncanny fashion in the home of the
revolutionary tradition, and it was as if the historian Furet had proved prescient
about the future as much as the past.
Furets panoramic history of the long French Revolution, 1770-1880, appeared in
French in 1988 on the eve of the Bicentenary celebrations. Given the date of its
writing, it might well have reproduced the slash-and-burn tactics of his previous
criticisms of the Lenino-populist vulgate. In two major works, Penser la rvolution
franaise (English translation, Interpreting the French Revolution, 1981) and with
Mona Ozouf, Dictionnaire critique de la rvolution franaise (English translation, A
Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution, 1989), Furet demolished the major
tenets of the Marxist interpretation, in particular the notion of a class-based,
bourgeois revolution as a metaphysical monster which suffocated historical
reality in the name of Jacobino-Leninist piety. He struck the pose of liberal St
George taking on the dragons of Marxist and Communist ideological conformity
and seemed never to let his guard down, even for a moment of celebration.
The tone of Revolutionary France is surprisingly serene, in contrast, as if the
author knew that the major battles had already been won. An opening note of non-
belligerence had sounded more faintly in the Dictionary, when on its very first
page, Furet and Ozouf had admitted that the notion of a bourgeois revolution was
not without pertinence or fruitfulness and that the idea of class struggle did
indeed have a legitimate place in a history of the French Revolution. The victors
could afford to show their generosity of spirit to the vanquished. But RevolutionaryFrance is no mopping-up operation. Where the Dictionary was the last volley in a
-
8/2/2019 The French Revolution at the End of the Cold War
2/2
barrage of criticism directed at the opposition, Revolutionary France ventures out
onto new territory altogether. Gone is the contentious dialogue with competing
views and Furets previous insistence on the superiority of criticism and analysis
over narrative. Instead, we get the Revolution as longue dure, told in an almost
19th-century way, with the author speaking as national sage.
For some time now, Furet has shown his predilection for the 19th-century
historians of the French Revolution. The Dictionary included a long section on
Historians and Commentators, in which the 20th-century historians of the
Revolution were relegated to one dismissive article. As far as Furet was concerned,
what was left of the academic equated with narrow and ruled by jealous
patrons tradition of Revolutionary historiography ended for good when George
Lefebvre lay down in the Procrustean bed of Marxism-Leninism. Furets few pages
on Alphonse Aulard, Albert Mathiez and Lefebvre (Albert Soboul and his successor
at the Sorbonne, Michel Vovelle, were apparently beneath contempt and so
merited no space at all) paled in comparison to the loving, vivid treatment of
Benjamin Constant, Louis Blanc, Jules Michelet, Edgar Quinet and a handful of
other, non-academic, non-positivist, non-specialist writers including Karl Marx
who shared a grand passion for public affairs and sought the secrets of
contemporary France in the heritage of the Great Revolution.