Download - UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
1/123
OXIDATIVE PRESSURE LEACHING
OF CHALCOCITE IN SULPHURIC ACID
by
Ishwinder Singh Grewal
B.A.Sc, The University ofBritish Columbia, 1989
A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF
THE REQUIREMENTS FORTHE DEGREE OF
MASTEROF APPLIED SCIENCE
in
THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES
Department of Metals and Materials Engineering
We accept this thesis as conforming
to the required standard
THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
October 1991
Ishwinder Singh Grewal, 1991
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
2/123
In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced
degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it
freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive
copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my
department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or
publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written
permission.
Department of (V\gjbn\< \ - Mc\e* .qU Bvqc^e^nWj
The University of British Columbia
Vancouver, Canada
Date O C T - M
DE-6 (2/88)
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
3/123
ABSTRACT
At INCO's Copper CliffCopper Refinery, a copper sulphide residue containing precious
metals is subjected to a pressure leach at 115C Copper occurs predominantly as G12S and
Cu : %S. The leach produces a slurry of copper sulphate solution and basic copper sulphate and
precious metals solids. The basic copper sulphate is dissolved in spent acid from the
electrowinning tankhouse leaving a precious metals residue for further processing. The leach
periodically develops a problem referred to as a "slow cook" where leaching times are greatly
extended and/or incomplete leaching ofcopper is encountered.
Based on earlier work, chalcocite leaching was proposed to occur sequentially via the
following reactions:
1. Cw,S+ //2S04+102 - CuS+ CuSCuS+ Cu{OH\ CuSOA
3. Cw1S+^02+H20 -*^CuS+^(2Cu(OH) 2'CuSOt)
4. CuS + 202-+CuSOt
5. CuS+H^ + ^-^CuSO^+H^ +S
The exact reaction path is determined by the initial solution conditions (copper sulphate
and sulphuric acid concentrations). Under normal batch makeup conditions, all of the CU2S is
oxidized to cupric ions and sulphate via reactions 1,2 and 4. If the solution becomes depleted in
copper and acid, reaction 3 could occur. Elemental sulphur can be produced via reaction 5.
Experimental studies showed that the reactions were nearly sequential. Reactions 1 and 2
were found to be very fast relative to the rate of reaction 4. No slow cook conditions were
observed in the laboratory under normal leaching conditions. There is evidence suggesting that
-ii-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
4/123
the slow cooks are caused by oxygen mass transfer limitations under conditions where the
slurry becomes highly viscous and pseudoplastic due to formation of finely divided basic
copper sulphate.
-iii-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
5/123
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT ii
Table of Tables vi
Table of Figures viiAcknowledgements xi
CHAPTER 1 - Introduction 1
CHAPTER2 - Background and Literature Review 4
2.1 Overview of the INCO-CRED Process 4
2.1.1 Background of the Second Stage Leach 7
2.1.2 The Second Stage Leach 10
2.2 The UBC Screening Model 12
2.3 Scope of the Study 21
2.4 Literature Review 22
2.4.1 Copper Sulphides - Chalcocite to Covellite 22
2.4.2 Leaching of Chalcocite and Covellite 23
2.4.3 Electrochemical Studies 30
2.4.4 Eh -pH Relationships and Phase Systems 33
2.4.5 Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer in Oxidative Leaching 38
2.5 Summary 41
CHAPTER3 - Experimental Methods 43
3.1 Part A: Study of the sequential nature of the reactions 44
3.1.1 Batch make-up chemistry 44
3.1.2 Experimental procedure 45
3.1.3 Additional experiments in Part A 46
3.2 Part B: Kinetic Experiments 47
3.3 Part C: Leaching CuS in the presence of basic copper sulphate 48
-iv-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
6/123
CHAPTER4 - Results and Discussion 50
4.1 Part A: Study of the sequential nature of the reactions 50
4.1.1 The behavior of copper dissolution 50
4.1.2 Iron and Arsenic 58
4.1.3 Nickel and Cobalt 61
4.1.4 Additional Observations ofPart A Experiments 63
4.2 Part B: Kinetic Experiments 63
4.3 Part C: Leaching CuS in the presence of basic copper sulphate 66
4.3.1 Discussion ofORP Measurements 71
4.4 Comparison ofLeaching Rates - Part A and Part C 72
4.5 Additional Observations 73
CHAPTER5 - Conclusions and Recommendations 76
5.1 Conclusions 76
5.2 Recommendations for further work 77
REFERENCES 79
APPENDIX A - Detailed Flowsheet of the CRED Plant 82
APPENDIX B - Planned Experiments for Part B-1 83
APPENDIX C - Assay results ofPart A experiments 84
APPENDIX D - Part B experimental results 90
APPENDIX E - Part C experimental results 101
APPENDIX F - Part C experimental results - Effect ofiron plots 107
-v-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
7/123
Table of Tables
Table 2.1 Typical Assay ofIPC Residue 4
Table 3.1 Assay ofFirst Stage Residue used in Part A Experiments 44
Table 3.2 List ofpart C experiments performed 49
Table 4.1 X-Ray Diffraction Results 54
Table 4.2 Degree ofsulphur oxidation 65
Table 4.3 Time taken to leach to 10,15 and 20% oxygen consumption 66
Table 4.4 Potential and pH measurements of the leach slurry after leaching and the
approximate temperatures at which they were measured 69
Table 4.5 Comaparison of oxygen flow rates 73
Table Bl. List of the planned experiments for part B 83
Table Cl. Amount of the indicated species in the leach solution at various oxygen
consumption levels '. 84
Table C2. Amount of the indicated species in the releach solution at various oxygen
consumption levels : 85
Table C3. Amount of the indicated species in the releach cake at various oxygen
consumption levels 86
Table C4. Total amount ofspecies (calculated as a sum oftables C1-C3) in the process
87
Table C5. Distribution ofspecies of experiments performed with the "copper
depleted cake" 88
Table C6. The pH and ORP values of the slurry after leaching to a given level of
oxygen consumption 89
-vi-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
8/123
Table of Figures
Figure 1.1 Classification of leaching methods 2
Figure 2.1 General processing route of the IPC residue at the INCO-CRED plant in
Copper Cliff 6
Figure 2.2 Second Stage Leaching Circuit at INCO's - Copper CliffCopper Refinery... 10
Figure 2.3 Approximate shape and dimensions of the Second Stage Autoclaves 11
Figure 2.4 Distribution ofspecies as predicted by model for case (i) conditions 16
Figure 2.5 Oxygen flow rates as predicted by model for case (i) conditions 16
Figure 2.6 Distribution ofspecies as predicted by model for case (ii) conditions 18
Figure 2.7 Oxygen flow rate as predicted by model for case (ii) conditions 18
Figure 2.8 Distribution ofspecies as predicted by model for case (iii) conditions 19
Figure 2.9 Oxygen flow rate as predicted by model for case (iii) conditions 19
Figure 2.10 Distribution ofspecies as predicted by model for case (iv) conditions 20
Figure 2.11 Oxygen flow rate as predicted by model forcase (iv) conditions 20
Figure 2.12 Crystal structures of copper sulphide minerals relevant to this study 22
Figure 2.13 Leaching morphology for a chalcocite particle (a)0-20% copper extraction
03)20-50% copper extraction (c) 50-100% copper extraction 26Figure 2.14 Evans diagram of applicable polarization curves during oxygen pressure
leaching of chalcocite 27
Figure 2.15a-b Potential-pH diagram for the Cu-S-H20 system 34
Figure 2.16a-b Thermal precipitation diagrams for the CUSO4-H2SO4-H2O system ....... 35
Figure 2.17 Thermal precipitationdiagram for the CUSO4-H2SO4-H2O system at 100C
for 3cu2+= a
S04 2- 36
Figure 2.18a-b Phase diagrams of the Cu-S system. The blaubleinder covelUte is
abbreviated as "be" 37
Figure 2.19 Models for oxygen adsorption during oxidative leaching 40
Figure 3.1 Schematic of the experimental setup 43
Figure 4.1 The distributionof copper during leaching of chalcocite 52
Figure 4.2 Similar to Figure 4.1 - no copper in solids shown to magnify scale 52
Figure 4.3 Comparison of the model results to the actual behavior 53
-vii-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
9/123
Figure 4.4"Reaction" temperature versus pH^ change during precipitation from 1 M
CuS0 4 solution. The "equihbrium" boundary for 1 M solution isalso shown 56
Figure 4.5 Comparison ofsulphur levels in the leach residue between the model and
actual results 57
Figure 4.6 Distribution ofiron during leaching. 59
Figure 4.7 SEM photomicrographps - Effect ofiron on agglomerate size of the
precipitate 60
Figure 4.8 Distribution of arsenic during leaching 61
Figure 4.9 Distribution ofnickel during leaching 62
Figure 4.10 Distribution of cobalt during leaching 62
Figure 4.11 Oxygen consumption rate at various initial copper concentrations with
[Fe]=0.25g/L. Each curve represents a different level ofoxygen consumption
.- 67
Figure 4.12 Oxygen consumption rate at various copper concentrations with [Fe]=0
g/L. Each curve represents a different level ofoxygen consumption 68
Figure 4.13 The effect ofinitial copper concentration on the measured ORP at [Fe]=0
and [Fe]=0.25 g/L 70
Figure 4.14Evans diagram of applicable polarization curves during pressure
leaching ofCuS (schematic) 70
Figure 4.15 A schematic highlighting areas believed to be well mixed in the second
stageautoclave. The poorly mixed zones are thought to be the result of theobserved pseudoplastic behavior ofthe slurry 75
Figure Al . Detailed flowsheet of the CRED Plant 82
Figure DI. Rate ofoxygen consumption for the condition where (x2,x3,x4)=(l,l,0) and
xt=0 91
Figure D2. Rate ofoxygen consumption for the condition where (x2,x3,x4)=(l,0,l) and
x,=0 91
Figure D3. Rate ofoxygen consumption for the condition where (x2,X3/x4)=(l/-l/0) and
x,=0 92
Figure D4. Rate ofoxygen consumption for the condition where (x2,x3/x4)=(l/0,-l)and
x,=0 92
Figure D5. Rate ofoxygen consumption for the condition where (x2/X3/X4)=(0,l,-l) and
x1=0 93
Figure D6. Rate ofoxygen consumption for the condition where (x2,x3/x4)=(0,0,0) and
x1=0 93
-viii-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
10/123
Figure D7. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where (x2/x3/X4)=(0,l/l) and
x,=0 94
Figure D8. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where (x2/x3,X4)=(0/-l/l) and
x 1= 0 94
Figure D9. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where (x2,x3,x4)=(0,-l,-l)
andx^O 95
Figure D10. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where (x2/x3/X4)=(0,0,0)
andx,=0 95
Figure DTI. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where
( x ^ x ^ M - l A L O ) 96
Figure D12. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where
(x1,x
2,x
3/x
4)=(-l,0,-l,0) 96
Figure D13. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where(x1/x2/x3^4)=(-l,0J3/-l) 97
Figure D14. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where
( x ^ x ^ M - l A O , ! ) 97
Figure D15. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where (x2/x3/x4)=(-l,0,l)
and x:=0 98
Figure D16. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where (x2,x
3,x
4)=(-l
/0,-l)
andx,=0 98
Figure D17. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where (x2,x3/X4)=(-l,l,0)and x1=0 99
Figure D18. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where (x2,x
3/x
4)=(-l,-l,0)
andx 1=0 99
Figure D19. Rate of oxygen consumption for the condition where
(x:/x2,x3/X4)=(-l,-l,0,0) 100
Figure El. Rate of oxygen consumption where initial [Cu]=0 g/L and [Fe]=0.25 g/L
102
Figure E2. Rate of oxygen consumption where initial [Cu]=80 g/L and [Fe]=0.25 g/L102
Figure.E3. Rate of oxygen consumption where initial [Cu]=10 g/L and [Fe]=0.25 g/L
> 103
Figure E4. Rate of oxygen consumption where initial [Cu]=40 g/L and [Fe]=0.25 g/L
103
- i x -
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
11/123
Figure E5. Rate ofoxygen consumption where initial [Cu]=l g/L and [Fe]=0.25 g/L
104
Figure E6. Rate ofoxygen consumption where initial [Cu]=0 g/L and [Fe]=0 g/L 104
Figure E7. Rate ofoxygen consumption where initial [Cu]=80 g/L and [Fe]=0 g/L 105
Figure E8. Rate ofoxygen consumption where initial [Cu]=10 g/L and [Fe]=0 g/L 105
Figure E9. Rate ofoxygen consumption where initial [Cu]=40 g/L and [Fe]=0 g/L 106
Figure E10. Rate ofoxygen consumption where initial [Cu]=l g/L and [Fe]=0 g/L 106
Figure Fl . Rate ofoxygen consumption for various initial copper concentrations at
the 10% oxygen consumption point 108
Figure F2. Rate ofoxygen consumption for various initial copper concentrations at
the 20% oxygenconsumption point 108
Figure F3. Rate ofoxygenconsumption for various initial copper concentrations atthe 30% oxygenconsumption point 109
Figure F4. Rate ofoxygen consumption for various initial copper concentrations at
the 40% oxygen consumption point 109
Figure F5. Rate ofoxygenconsumption for various initial copper concentrations at
the 50% oxygen consumption point 110
Figure F6. Rate ofoxygen consumption for various initial copper concentrations at
the 60% oxygen consumption point 110
Figure F7. Rate ofoxygenconsumption for various initial copper concentrations atthe 70% oxygen consumption point I l l
Figure F8. Rate ofoxygen consumption for various initial copper concentrations at
the 80% oxygen consumption point I l l
-x-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
12/123
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thankDr. David Dreisinger for his constant encouragement and support
and Dr. Ernest Peters for his thought provoking discussions and ideas throughout the course of
this project.
I wish to thankINCO; without their financial support and faculties, this project would not
have been possible. Thanks are also extended to all of the people associated with INCO who
helped in various ways in the completion of the experimental work.
I wish to thankmy mother who has always encouraged me to press on and has shown me
the value of perseverance. I also wish to thank my wife for believing in me more than I believed
in myself throughout this endeavor.
And a final thanks is extended to the Cy and Emerald Keyes Foundation for their financial
support.
-xi-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
13/123
CHAPTER1 -Introduction
Copper is one of the less abundant base metals found in the earth's crust occurring at
levels of approximately 7 ppm (compared to aluminum and iron at approximately 80 000 and 60
000 ppm respectively) [1]. Approximately 90% of the world's supply of copper occurs as
sulphidic ores. Pyrometallurgical techniques have historically been the dominant processing
method. However, pollution problems associated with sulphur dioxide emissions from
pyrometallurgical operations has resulted in a considerable research effort in
hydrometallurgicalprocessing of copper and other sulphide ores.
Some of the main advantages that hydrometallurgical processes offer are that:
1. Hydrometallurgy allows the processing of complex ores with multiple recoverable metals.
By controlling solution conditions, it is possible to recover various metals in separate unit
operations. These metals can be sold for additional revenues.
2. Hydrometallurgicaloperations are performed at lower temperatures and generally use less
energy compared to the high temperatures often employed in pyrometallurgical
operations. This is especially true for low grade ores.
3. Hydrometallurgy has often been found to be more economically viable in the treatment of
low grade ores especially if the crushing and grinding steps can be minimized as in
percolation leaching methods.
4. Hydrometallurgical operations produce little or no air pollution. The liquid waste
generated at hydrometallurgical plants is often easier to contain and treat than effluent
gases.
5. Solutions and slurries in hydrometallurgical plants are easily transported by pipeline
systems as opposed to moving of molten slags and mattes between furnaces using heavy
refractory ladles in pyrometallurgical processes.
-1-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
14/123
Successful hydrometallurgical processes for copper extraction from sulphide concentrates
have been proposed and designed but they have not been able to compete commercially with
pyrometallurgical processes. Although hydrometallurgical processes have demonstrated many
advantages as listed above, they are not a panacea for extractive metallurgy. Buthydrometallurgy does have an important role to play in the treatment ofspecific ores such as
low-grade ores, complex mineral ores and secondary materials produced from other
pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical operations.
The most common hydrometallurgical step is the leaching process which serves to free the
desired constituents from the gangue material via dissolution. In general, leaching methods can
be classified into percolation leaching and agitated leaching (see Figure 1.1). The method used
depends upon the nature of the ore and the mineral deposit.
f
In-situ
Leaching
Percolation Leaching
t
Heap or
Dump
Leaching
Leaching Method
t
Vat
Leaching
Agitated Leaching
Thin Layer
LeachingSlime (Pulp)
Leaching
Pressure
Leaching
t
Baking
Process
Figure 1.1 Classification of leaching methods [2].
-2-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
15/123
The leaching reagents used must dissolve the ore minerals as rapidly as possible and be
substantially inert towards the gangue minerals. Extensive reaction with the gangue minerals
causes excessive reagent consumption and causes the solution to become fouled with
impurities. The reagent must also be readily available and as inexpensive as possible.
Leaching in the presence ofsulphuric acid is one of the most common methods in leaching
copper sulphides. Sulphides are insoluble in dilute sulphuric acids but can be solubilized if
oxidizing species are present in solution. These oxidizing agents include oxygen, sulphate and
chloride salts ofiron and copper and aqueous chlorine (ie. hypochlorous acid and hypochlorite).
Acids, present as concentrated solutions, are sometimes also powerful oxidizing agents.
Increasing temperature and oxygen pressures have been found to contribute significantly to the
rate of copper extraction.
One process for the leaching of copper from a sulphide residue is the CRED1 Second Stage
Leach at INCO's Copper Cliff Copper Refinery. The second stage leach processes secondary
material, mostly CujS, generated from a preceding metathetic leach. The objective of this thesis
is to investigate the poor leaching behavior that has occasionally been encountered in this
process. The problem ofslow copper leaching kinetics has existed for approximately 15 years
occasionally becoming severe enough to warrant investigation. The research workcontained in
this thesis was designed following some initial mathematical modelling work done by
Dreisinger and Peters [3] at U.B.C. which pointed to a possible metallurgical explanation for the
poor leaching behavior.
This thesis is organized in the following way. Chapter 2 contains a brief literature survey
on the leaching behavior of copper sulphides. Chapter 2 also contains the investigations done
in the past by INCO and the model developed at U.B.C. Chapter 3 covers the experimentalmethods and chapter 4 contains the results and discussions. In chapter 5, some conclusions and
recommendations are offered.
1 CRED - Copper Refinery Electrowinning Department
-3-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
16/123
CHAPTER2 - Background and Literature Review
2.1 Overview of the INCO-CRED Process
INCCs Copper Cliff Nickel Refinery extracts nickel via the INCO Pressure Carbonyl
(IPC) process. This process produces a residue that contains mostly copper along with the other
constituents shown in Table 2.1. Approximately 50 tons of this residue are processed daily in a
hydrometallurgical plant (CRED-Copper Refinery Electrowinning Department) at the Copper
CliffCopper Refinery. The purpose of the CRED plant is to separate the various constituents of
the IPC residue through a number ofhydrometallurgical operations (see Figure 2.1) [4]. The
process steps include pressure leaching, cementation, precipitation, thickening, filtration andelectrowinning. A detailed process flowchart is provided in Appendix A.
Table 2.1 Typical Assay ofIPC Residue [4].
Weight Percent Oz/Ton
Cu Ni Co Fe S Se Te PGM + Au Ag
55-60 6-10 4-8 4-9 13-19 0.06-0.10 0.06-0.10 20-30 25-45
The IPC residue is first treated via a metathetic pressure leach in sulphuric acid (100-200
g/L) and copper sulphate (40-90 g/L) solution at 150C. This batch process, referred to as First
Stage Leaching, is used to dissolve nickel, cobalt and iron and separate these metals from
copper, selenium, tellurium and precious metals which remain in the solid phase. The overallreactions taking place in the leaching process are:
MeO(s) + H2SOA = MeS04+H20
Me(s) + CuSOt= MeSOA + Cu(s)
-4-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
17/123
MeS(s) + CuSOA =MeSOA + CuS(s)
where Me =Ni,Co,Fe
Approximately 95-98% of the base metals, other than copper, are leached out of the solids
in this step. The copper entering the first stage leach is present predominantly in the form of
CujS (chalcocite) and passes through to the second stage leach unmodified. Thefirststage leach
slurry is filtered. The filtrate is put through a copper clean-up circuit to remove some copper
which still remains in solution after the leach. Thefirststage leach residue is treated in a total
oxidative pressure leach at 115C. This step is referred to as Second Stage Leaching.
Thefirststage cake obtained from thefiltrationstep is combined with water and spent
electrolyte from the plant to produce a slurry of approximately 30% solids. This slurry is
charged into the second stage autoclaves. The chalcocite is batch-leached to form a slurry of
neutral copper sulphate (CuS04) solution (pH of -2.5-3.0) and basic copper sulphate
(CuS04-2Cu(OH)2) solids. The slurry is then mixed with spent electrolyte to dissolve the basic
copper sulphate to leave a residue containing precious metals and lead sulphate. Selenium,
tellurium and most of the base metals are also solubilized during the leaching process. The
unleached solids arefilteredout for processing at another INCO plant to recover the precious
metals. The solution is treated for selenium-tellurium removal and then pumped to the
tankhouse for copper recovery via electrowinning.
Selenium and tellurium removal is essential because these impurities tend to co-deposit
with the copper during electrowinning and contaminate the cathodes. The removal of Se and
Te is achieved by heating the solution to 95 C and passing it through a column filled with
copper shot. This promotes the formation ofselenide and telluride precipitates that form as fine
blackparticulates. The solution and solids are passed through four aging towers in series in
which the solids settle out. The Se and Te concentrations are reduced to less than 1 mg/1 in
solution. The overflow from the aging towers is passed through polishingfiltersand sent to the
electrowinning circuit.
-5-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
18/123
PM ResidueSpent Electrolyte
Sulphuric Acid
Oxygen . . Second StagePressureLeaching
First
Stage
Cake
IPC Residuefrom INCOPressure CarbonylProcess ^
First StagePressureLeaching
Spent
Electrolyte
First
Stage
Filtrate
NaSH '
Filter Aid
CopperClean-up
CuS to SecondStage PressureLeaching
Se, Te Residue
Filtrate Selenium,TelluriumRemoval
CuShot
Filter Aid
Steam
Sulphuric Acid
SteamOxygen
Lime
Filter Aid
Filtrate
Iron/ArsenicRemoval
Iron hydroxide-Gypsum Solidsto Effluent
Filtrate CopperElectrowinning
Titanium Blanks
Lead Anodes
Reagents
Water/Steam
Soda Ash
Steam
Filtrate
Nickel-CobaltRecovery
CopperCathodes
Spent
Electrolyte
Nickel/Cobalt* Carbonate
Vacuum
Bosh Pond
Figure 2.1 General processing route ofthe IPC residue at the INCO-CRED plant in Copper
Cliff
The filtrate from the first stage leach is processed through a copper clean-up circuit to
remove any copper which exists in solution in the form ofcopper sulphate. The removal is
necessary to prevent copper losses to the effluent during the iron/arsenic removal step and to
prevent copper contamination of the nickel/cobalt carbonate. The copper is removed by the
addition of a 30% NaHS solution at 70 C. Most ofthe copper is precipitated as CuS. The process
is controlled so as to prevent the evolution ofH2S gas. A thickener is used to thicken the CuS
precipitate. The solids are returned to the first stage filters and the overflow solution is sent to
the iron/arsenic removal circuit.
-6-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
19/123
The objective of the iron/arsenic removal circuit is to produce environmentally stable
compounds of iron, arsenic and sulphur and discard them to the effluent stream without
excessive loss of nickel and cobalt. The feed solution to this circuit contains 0.02 g/L copper,
25-35 g/L nickel, 15-25 g/L cobalt, 20-35 g/L iron, 1-2 g/L arsenic, and 40-70 g/L sulphuric
acid. It is processed continuously at a rate of 150 L/min. Lime slurry is added to the solution as
it is passed through two autoclaves operating under oxygen pressure at 90-95 C. The iron and
arsenic precipitate out and the solids are separated by filtration to produce an iron-gypsum
cake. The filtrate is sent to the nickel/cobalt recovery step. The iron-gypsum cake is partially
redissolved to remove co-precipitated nickel and cobalt and then filtered. The filter cake is sent
to the tailings and the filtrate is returned ahead of the iron precipitation circuit.
The filtrate from the iron removal circuit is mixed with a 200 g/L solution of sodium
carbonate (Na2C03) in two reaction vessels in series. The pH is controlled in the ranges 7.6-7.8
and 8.1-8.3 in the two vessels respectively. The reaction product is a precipitate of basic nickel
and cobalt carbonates which is thickened to 20-25% solids. The nickel/cobalt carbonate is
shipped to the cobalt refinery and the barren solution is pumped to the waste pond.
2.1.1 Background of the Second Stage Leach
When the CRED plant first became operational in the early 70's, the second stage leach
was designed to leach CU2S completely in the presence ofexcess acid (H2SO4) and under
oxygen pressure at 110C. The products of the leaching process were CuS04(aq) and
elemental sulphur. The equation governing the process was reported as [5]:
Cu + 2HOt + 02 -> 2CuSO, + 2H20 +S
The leach products typically analyzed 90% elemental sulphur and 10% precious metals and
unreacted sulphides. The factors affecting the reaction rate were determined to be the iron
content of the solution, oxygen pressure, temperature and feed particle size. The acid and
copper concentrations were not found to be critical factors in the leaching rate. The iron
-7-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
20/123
content of the solution was identified as beingan important variable. With iron in solution,
the reaction proceeds rapidly according to the reaction above to form elemental sulphur.
However in the absence ofiron, the reaction proceeds more slowly and consumes up to 4
times as much oxygen and the sulphide sulphur is oxidized to sulphate according to the
reaction:
CifjS + H2SOA+\o2^> 2CuS04+H20
The leaching process was operated by this method for a few years. However, in the
mid-seventies, historical reports [6] show thata proposal was made to change the leaching
process. It was suggested that all the sulphide sulphur should be oxidized to form sulphate
as opposed to elemental sulphur by leaching in a low-acid solution. Based on laboratory
work, the product from this leaching method would produce a precipitate of basic copper
sulphate (CuS04-2Cu(OH)2) in a solution of copper sulphate. The slurry would have to be
mixed with spent electrolyte containing sulphuric acid to dissolve the precipitateand leave
a residue containing precious metals and a small amount of gangue materials. The
operating conditions of the process were set at 150 psi oxygen pressure at 105'C. The batch
feed to the autoclave would be a mixture of spent electrolyte containing sulphuricacid,
copper and iron in solution with first stage residue to form a slurry containing -40% solids
by weight.
The process was eventually changed to a total oxidative leach in 1975 with some
modifications being continually made to improve the process. Howver, the secondstage
leach residue occasionally showed high levels of copper still remaining in the solids even
after extended leaching times [7]. Extensive examination ofIPC residue, first stage residue
and poorly leached second state leach residue was carried out to determine the nature of the
poor leaching behavior. The results showed that the presence ofCu 20 in the feed to second
stage, associated with high levels of oxygen in the IPC residue, was linked to the poorly
leached batches. The presence ofCu 20 was proposed to cause an adhering film of basic
-8-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
21/123
copper sulphate at the point of basic copper sulphate formation. This would block oxidizing
species from reaching the copper sulphide particles and hinder further leaching.
Photomicrographs were presented to support this theory.
During 1986, slow leaching and high copper in the residue became a severe problem
and warranted further investigation of the process [8]. A complete leach should nominally
take 5 hours based on plant reports and experimental tests. However, the length of leach
times almost always exceeded 5 hours with the occasional leach time taking longer than 20
hours. For example, from plant data for the month ofJanuary 1988 [9], out of93 leaches, 33%
ofthe leaches exceeded 8 hours. A calculation in one report [10] gives the cost of downtime
as approximately $25 000 /hr for deferred revenues from precious metals. It is apparent
from this calculation how even small improvements in leaching times can make a significant
difference to the revenues over one year.
One laboratory study [11] of the second stage leach shows some interesting results on
the behavior of the process with respect to pulp density, particle size of precipitate, and
agitation speed. It was found that higher solids density feeds lowered the leaching rate of
copper considerably due to higher viscosity of the solution. In lab tests with normal solids
densities, higher viscosities were observed on the material which leached poorly in the plant
as opposed to material which leached quickly. The higher viscosities observed in this case
were associated with afinerparticle size of the precipitate. The agitation speed of the slurry
also had a significant effect on the leaching rate. All these factors appear to indicate that
oxygen dispersion in the autoclave is severely affected by changing viscosities and agitation
speed.
The autoclaves have no level meter, so the impeller depth varies considerablybetween
leaches. Impeller depth was suggested to be an important parameter in the leaching rate in
one study and so the slurry level was lowered (amount unknown) and was found to
improve the leaching process for a short while. However, this did not cure the problem
permanently.
-9-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
22/123
2.1.2 The Second Stage Leach
The equipment used in the second stage leaching process consistsofa batch make-up
tank/2 titanium autoclaves, a dissolving tank, 2 pressure filters and a rotary vacuum filter
(Figure2.2) [4]. There are also product holding tanks between various stages of the process.
PM residueslurry storage
Figure 2.2 Second Stage Leaching Circuit at INCO's - Copper CliffCopper Refinery [4].
The autoclaves were originally designed for leaching in excess acid as described
earlier but were modified in the mid-seventies when the process was changed. The major
change to the autoclaves was the installation of vertical cooling coils around the inside
-10-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
23/123
perimeter of the vessels (see figure 2.3) [12]. The agitator system consists of two 45'
pitched-down, 4 bladed turbine impellers attached to a single 18 cm diameter shaft rotating
at 68 rpm. The internal parts are made out of 316L stainless steel.
Oxygen
Sparger
Figure 2.3 Approximateshape and dimensions of the Second Stage Autoclaves [12].
-11-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
24/123
The feed is prepared as a 30% solids slurry by mixing spent electrolyte from the
electrowinning plant, water and first stage residue in the batch make-up tank. The slurry is
then pumped into one of the second stage autoclaves. The autoclave is then pressurized
with oxygen to 150 psi while the slurry is being agitated. The temperature is maintained at
115C during the leach. The leaching process is assumed to be complete when there is no
more oxygen consumption, no more heat being generated and there is no temperature
increase when cooling is off. The slurry is then pumped to the redissolving tank where it is
mixed with spent electrolyte and filter aid. The acid in the spent electrolyte dissolves the
basic copper sulphate. The unleached solids are then recovered by pressure filtration and
the filtrate is sent to Se/Te removal. The solids are repulped in water and refiltered to
recover the precious metals residue. The final residue is shipped to Port Colborne for
precious metals recovery.
2.2 The UBC Screening Model
The studies in the past have been inconclusive in determining the cause of the long
leaching times and incomplete leaching in the second stage autoclaves. A mathematical model
of the CRED second stage leach was developed at UBC by Dreisinger and Peters [3] in an
attempt to evaluate possible metallurgical causes of the "slow cook" conditions occurring in the
process. This screening model was a first approximation to possibly highlight some of the
conditions that may lead to slow cook conditions. The model was developed on a number of
important assumptions based on work previously done by Peters and Mao [13] on the leaching
ofCu2S underslightly acidic conditions. Their workproduced the following results:
i. Cu^ leaches very quickly to CuS.
ii. The CuS produced by leaching Cu2S tends to fracture and become finely disseminated.
iii. Cu ^ conversion to CuS proceeds very quickly relative to the leaching ofCuS.
iv. A small amount ofiron in solution promotes elemental sulphur formation during leaching.
The leaches with no iron showed little or no elemental sulphur in the leach residue.
-12-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
25/123
Since CuS leaching proceeds slowly relative to Cu 2S conversion to CuS, it is possible to
separate the leaching steps of Cu 2S conversion to CuS and CuS leaching to CuSGv In
developing the model, a number of discrete leaching reactions were proposed which would
proceed one at a time depending on the prevailing solution conditions and the character of the
unreacted solids. These reactions are:
1. CuxS+{x- l]H2SO CuS+^(x - 1)2CM(0//)J CuS04
3. CuxS+^(x - \)02 + (x -\)H20 -> ^(3-x)CuS+^(x- l)(2Ca(0//), CuSOj
4. CuS + 202-+CuSOt
5. CuS+H2SOi+^02^,CuSOi+H20 + S
where Cu,S refers to the average Cu/S mole ratio in the feed, not to any particular mineral
form and the value of is approximately 2.
There are five reaction pathways possible under various initial batch recipes.
i. Begin with copper sulphate and acid in solution.
Reaction 1 proceeds until acid depletion.
Reaction 2 proceeds until only CuS is left in the residue
Reaction 4 proceeds to total oxidative endpoint.
ii. Begin with copper sulphate in solution and no acid.
Reaction 2 proceeds until only CuS is left in the residue.
Reaction 4 proceeds to total oxidative endpoint.
iii. Begin with copper sulphate andexcess acid in solution. ,
Reaction 1 proceeds until only CuS is left in the residue.
Reaction 5 proceeds to acid depletion.
Reaction 4 proceeds to total oxidative endpoint.
-13-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
26/123
iv. Begin with acid and low copper in solution.
Reaction 1 proceeds until acid depletion.
Reaction 2 proceeds until copper sulphate is depleted.
Reaction 3 proceeds until only CuS is left in the residue.
Reaction 4 proceeds to total oxidative endpoint.
v. Begin with low copper and no acid in solution.
Reaction 2 proceeds until copper sulphate is depleted.
Reaction 3 proceeds until only CuS is left in the residue.
Reaction 4 proceeds to total oxidative endpoint.
The kinetic routine in the model was divided into a two-step process. The first step is
gas-liquid mass transfer defined by the following equation,
d[02]- ^ - = *,([OJ -[Oz])
where kg is the gas-liquid mass transfer coefficient for the system
[OJ" is the saturated oxygen cone, in solution at the oxygen partial pressure in the
autoclave
[02] is the oxygen concentration in the bulksolution
The next step is controlled by chemical reaction defined by the following empirical equation:
=k^Cu2*][O J + ^[CM 2 +] [OJ [CuxS]
where kt and k2 are empirical rate constants.
The equation is defined on the basis of copper catalysis which is first order in cupric and
dissolved oxygen concentrations and a solids leaching term which is first order in cupric,
dissolved oxygen and unreacted CuJ$ concentrations. The first term recognizes the significant
role of copper ion catalysis and the second term accounts for the fact that the rate will drop as
the solids concentration goes to zero.
-14-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
27/123
The kinetic equations suggest that the amount of copper in solution at any given time is
very important to therate and that lower copper concentrations will cause slower leaching rates.
Ifthe copper in solution is depleted, the rate is expected to go to zero. This is the anticipated
slow leaching behavior observed in the plant known as the "slow cook" condition.
In this preliminary model, the rate constants were treated as fixed values because of the
unavailability of additional data. These values probably change due to changing conditions
during leaching.
Figures 2.4-2.11 show some sample outputs of the model generated from various initial
concentrations ofacid and copper in solution. It can be seen that the slow cook condition occurs
only when there is a depletion of copper in solution.
Figure 2.4 shows the model output from a case when there are acid and copper in solution
at a level which will cause the reactions to proceed as described in case (i) above. The output can
be split into 3 sections. In the first section, according to reaction 1, acid is being consumed to
leach copper from Cuand the copper concentration is increasing in solution. When the acid is
depleted, at around the 16-minute mark, the process proceeds according to reaction 2 and
produces basic copper sulphate from CuxS and CuS04. The copper concentration decreases as
shown. Eventually, when all the Cu^S is transformed to CuS, the leaching proceeds according
to reaction 4 until all the CuS is leached. Figure 2.5 is the corresponding oxygen consumption
rate curve. This shows that the initial rate of reaction rises very quickly as the amount of copper
in solution rises and the rate drops as the copper is depleted via reaction 2. The reaction rates
never drop to low levels because there is always a lot of copper in solution available for
catalysis. The complete leach time is approximately 5 hours and is close to the times observed
in plant operations for a normal leach.
Figures 2.6 and 2.7 represent case (ii) in which the there is no acid available at the
beginning of the leach and the initial copper concentration is approximately 100 g/L. The
-15-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
28/123
320 -
280 -
240 -
^ 20 0 -c
o
a
s
160 -
c -
120 -
880 -
40 -
0 -
Concentration Profiles Predicted by Model
_ \\\
\C u
xs
V\V\\\ 2Cu(OH)2.CuS04
- Y/ \///;
Cu
N
W - H 2 S 0 41 1 1 I 1 1 1 I
_ _ " " ~ r
40 80 120 160 200 240 280
Time (min)
Figure 2.4 Distribution ofspecies as predicted by model for case (i) conditions.
0.04
0.035
Oxygen Flowrate Predicted by Model
28 0
Time (min)
Figure 2.5 Oxygen flow rate as predicted by model for case (i) conditions.
-16-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
29/123
model predicts a higher amount of basic copper sulphate formation via reaction2 until all Cu,S
is converted to CuS. The kinetics are good in this case because the copper in solution never
drops below 50 g/1.
Figures 2.8 and 2.9 shows the effect ofexcess acid in solution at the beginning of leach.Because there is still acid present after all the CuxS has been converted to CuS, sulphur
formation is expected via reaction5 and no basic copper sulphate is produced. Near the end of
the leach process, the solubility of copper sulphate is exceeded resulting in the precipitation of
CuS04.5H 20.
The model was operated under conditions which would cause a copper deficiency during
operation. This was done by setting a high copper to sulphur ratio in the feed solids and less
acid in the feed solution. The resulting output is shown in Figures 2.10 and 2.11. The acid and
copper in solution drop very quickly and the result is a severe drop in the leaching rate. It is also
important to note that a significant amount of basic copper sulphate solids is produced. This
high amount of solids could cause a significant drop in gas-liquid mass transfer although the
model does not incorporate the effect of solids loading into the gas-liquid mass transfer rate.
The total leach time is predicted to exceed 25 hours.
The model predicts slow leaching conditions under copper depleted conditions but the
model requires verification. Firstly, the sequential reaction chemistry proposed in the model
needed to be verified through experimental work. Secondly, better kinetic relationships need to
be developed because the model used an empirical relationship for the rate of reaction. The
objective of this thesis project was to obtain experimental data to improve the understanding of
the leaching process and eventually to develop a better model.
-17-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
30/123
co034=C
oo
280
240
200
160
120
80
Concentration Profiles Predicted by Model
ri
i
\
I \ C"xS/ ^
2Cu(OH)2.CuS04rii
\
I \ C"xS/ ^/ \ // " " ^ " Cu
1 \,
100 200
Time (min)
300 400
Figure 2.6 Distribution ofspecies as predicted by model forcase (ii) conditions.
Oxygen Flowrate Predicted by Model
200
Time (min)
Figure 2.7 Oxygenflowrate as predicted by model for case (ii) conditions.
-18-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
31/123
320 -i280 -240 -
i 200 -
ritratiot
160 -ncei
120 -8
80 -40 -0 -
Concentration Profiles Predicted by Model
\CujSCu
CuS04.5H20
Time (min)
Figure 2.8 Distribution ofspecies as predicted by model for case (iii) conditions.
0.05 Oxygen Flowrate Predicted by Model
0.04c!o 0.03 -sf 0.02
0.01
0 I i iii ii ii ii i ii i iiiii -0 20 40 60 80 100 1 20 140 160 180 200Time (min)
Figure 2.9 Oxygen flow rate as predicted by model for case (iii) conditions.
-19-
http://cujs/http://cujs/ -
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
32/123
co
sc
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Concentration Profiles Predicted by Model
\ i
I
^ 2Cu(OH)2.CuS04
C U x S
Cu'TfrTrTrT
1
500 1000T I I 1
1500
Time (min)
Figure 2.10 Distribution ofspecies as predicted by model for case (iv) conditions.
Oxygen Flowrate Generated by Model0.04 -n
0.035 -
.g 0.03 -
| 0.025 -
| 0.02 -
o
c 0.015 -
I
I" 0.01 -0.005 -
0 " I I I \ 1 I I I I I I I I I 1
0 500 1000 1500
Time (min)
Figure 2.11 Oxygen flow rate as predicted by model for case (iv) conditions.
-20-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
33/123
2.3 Scope of the Study
A review of the history of the second stage leached has shown that a number of variables
have been considered in trying to improve the leaching process. Clearly, the dificulties with the
process have not been satisfactorily overcome. The most recent attempt at analyzing theproblem was the UBC screening model discussed earlier.
The present study was designed based on the results of the UBC screening model and the
earlier workdone at INCO labs. The main objetives ofthis study are:
1. to understand the reaction chemistry and check if the reactions are indeed
sequential as suggested in the UBC screening model.
2. to identify any intermediate copper sulphide products formed.
3. to investigate chemical kinetics of copper leaching for the first stage residue cake.
4. to provide a basis for further work to improve the present mathematical model or
develop a new mathematical model.
-21-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
34/123
2.4 Literature Review
2.4.1 Copper Sulphides -Chalcocite to Covellite
One of the most important economic copper minerals, chalcocite (CujS), is produced
by the reduction of CuS0 4 solutions descending from oxidation zones of copper rich
deposits in the earth [14]. Covellite (CuS), similarly, is usually found as an oxidation
product of chalcocite or other primary copper sulphides like chalcopyrite as a zone of
secondary enriched copper deposit. The oxidation of chalcocite does not lead to the direct
formation of covellite. The decomposition process produces many intermediate sulphides
such as djurleite (Cu196S), digenite (Cu, 76., g^S), blue-remaining covellite (Cu,,. 14S) and
covellite (CuS). Potter [15] has shown the existence of numerous intermediate phases andprovided free energy data for these phases. These phases are Cu ^S , Cu, o S, Cu, 76 5S,
Cu, 4S, Cu, ,S and CuS. Figure 2.12 shows the crystal structures of chalcocite, covellite and
digenite.
Chalcocite (hexagonal) Digenite (cubic) Covellite
Figure 2.12 Crystal structures ofcopper sulphides relevant to this study [14].
-22-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
35/123
In chalcocite and djurleite, the sulphur species are arranged in a hexagonal close
packed structure [14]. The copper ions are located near the triangular faces of the tetrahedral
sites as opposed to being in the center of the tetrahedral interstices. The structure of digenite
is a cubic close packed arrangement of the sulphur species and the copper ions are located
off-center in the tetrahedral interstices. One eighth of the tetrahedra are unoccupied [14].
Natural digenite has 1 at.% iron to maintain a stable solid solution composition but a stable
iron-free "low digenite" called anilite (Cu^S) is also found.
The structure of covellite is more complex as can be seen in Figure 2.12. The base
structureconsists of three layers of hexagonal close packed sulphur species. The copper ions
occupy the centers of the equilateral triangles and the centers of tetrahedral sites in the
layers.
2.4.2 Leaching of Chalcocite and Covellite
The leaching of chalcocite has often been reported as a two-step process according to
the following reaction sequence:
Cu** -> CuS+ Cu1++ 2e~
CuS->Cu2+ + S+ 2e~
A variety of leaching processes have been investigated in the laboratory and classified
according to the leaching steps and the types ofreagents used. The most common oxidizing
agents are:
Ferric sulphate in acid
Ferric chloride in acid
Oxygen in sulphuric acid
Oxygen in ammoniacal solutions
Nitric acid
-23-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
36/123
There are other oxidizing agents but they have not received much attention, mostly because
oftheir cost and commercial availability.
Sullivan [16] studied the leaching chemistry of chalcocite in acidified ferric sulphate
solutions using bottle roll tests at temperatures below 50 C The dissolution process was
found to occur in two steps. The first step was rapid until about 50% copper dissolution and
the second step, oxidation ofCuS, was relatively slow. The two reactions involved in the
leaching process were reported as:
CujS+ Fe2(SOJ3 -> CuSOA + 2FeSOA + CuS
CuS+ Fez(SO,\ -> Cu504 + IFeSOA + S
The study showed that the dissolution rate was independent of the strength offerric
sulphate provided sufficient reagent was present. At a constant ferric concentration, the rate
was also independent of acid strength. Various particle size fractions in the range of
-10-mesh to 200-mesh were also studied. Although there is considerable difference in
surface area per unit weight in this range, there was almost no difference in the leaching
rates (ie. time taken to dissolve a given amount of copper) observed, provided that the
particles were open to solution attack. The rate of dissolution was greatly affected by
temperature. For example, 73% copper dissolution required 1, 5 and 15 days at 50 C, 35 C,
23 C respectively. Sullivan reported no information on intermediate copper sulphide
phases.
Thomas et al. [17] examined the kinetics of dissolution of synthetic chalcocite and
digenite in acid ferric sulphate solutions using a rotating sintered disc technique. The study
found that digenite and chalcocite dissolved at similar rates. The dissolution was reportedto occur in stages where chalcocite is progressively converted into djurleite, digenite,
blaubleibender covellite (also known as blue-remaining covellite) and normal covellite. The
covellite is transformed to elemental sulphur according to the second of two equations
above. The rate of dissolution was found to be directly proportional to ferric ion
concentration between the ranges tested (0.025 M - 0.2 M). This ferric ion concentration
-24-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
37/123
dependency was not found in the studies by Sullivan. This difference is probably due to the
differences in experimental methodology. The rate was also found to depend significantly
on the temperature.
Mao and Peters [13] studied the leaching of chalcocite underautoclave conditions and
found the same two-stage leaching behavior reported in ferric sulphate leaching. During the
first stage, 50% of the copper is extracted and up to 100% of the chalcocite is converted to
covellite. The first stage is also separated into two steps which involves the initial
conversion of chalcocite to digenite and then subsequent conversion of digenite to covellite.
A leaching model to explain the leaching kinetics was based on three parts shown in Figure
2.13. The first step is a shrinking core kinetics model, the second includes particle break-up
and third is the effect of elemental sulphur morphology on kinetics. The leaching process is
described as a mixed-potential electrochemical model in which the first stage kinetics are
predominantly cathodically controlled. The presence of iron in solution leads to higher
leaching rates and decreases sulphur oxidation during the second stage. The second stage
kinetics are explained by the passivation of covellite by oxygen leading to a high mixed
potential. The Evans diagram in figure 2.14 shows a schematic of the applicable polarization
curves. Depassivation occurs in the presence ofFe2+
ions where the process operates at point
D and leads to a higher exchange current (leaching rate) and a lower mixed potential.
-25-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
38/123
First Step: Stage I LeachingCathodic:
02+4H+
+4e -^WiO (Cu & Cu^ Surface)
Anodic:CUTS -> CKgS + 0.2Cu2+ + OAe (Cu^S only)Volume Reduction: 7.6%
Second Step: Stage I LeachingCathodic:02 + 4H
+ + 4e
Anodic:CU2S- CulJSS+ 0.2Cw
2+
+OAe (CiijS only)
Cumulative Volume Reduction:24.4%
2H20 (CuS Surface)
Stage II LeachingCatnodic:02+4H
++4e^2H20 (CuS Surface)
Anodic:CuS-*Cu2++S + 2e
CuS+ 4H20 ->Cu+
+SOl'+ 8/T + Se
Cumulative Volume Reduction:43.6%(or more depending on degree of sulphuroxidation)
Figure 2.13 Leaching morphology for a chalcocite particle (a) 0-20% copper extraction
Ob) 20-50% copper extraction (c) 50-100% copper extraction [13].
-26-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
39/123
Otfluston - l \limited Otygen i ^hi Fww i \
0!
n _ A - B First SleO- Stag I teacftatgC Secofic Sm . Slage I teachingD Slags II Leaching (Fa * present)
Stage 11 Leaching(Fe' absent]
Legl-Cabin* Cumrtt [lenemalk)
Figure 2.14 Evans diagram of applicable polarization curves during oxygen pressure
leaching of chalcocite [13].
Oxygen pressure leaching experiments in an iron containing solution done by
Chmielewski and Charewicz [18] show that the partial pressure of oxygen governs the
process rate. The oxygen increased the kinetics mainlyby oxidizing the ferrous iron to ferric
iron, the main leaching agent, and not directly by interaction with the copper mineral.
King et al. [19] studied the leaching of chalcociteby acidic ferric chloride solutions and
found the same two stage leaching process observed in other studies. The first stage of the
reaction, to approximately 50% copper dissolution, was complete in less than 4 minutes at
temperatures between 40C and 80C.However, the second stage of leaching was strongly
affected by temperature as the kinetics were much more rapid at higher temperatures. The
apparent activation energy, Ea, for the first stage and second stage was 3.43 kj/mol and
101-122 kj/mol respectively. This difference in Ea was attributed to a difference in the
-27-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
40/123
charge transfer process between the two reactions. The first stage is probably controlled by
diffusion of copper ions in the particles and the second stage is chemically controlled by the
reaction ofS2' ions in CuS to form sulphur.
The first stage of the process proceeded more slowly with the larger particle sized
material due to a larger diffusion layer for the copper to travel through in the solid. The
second stage was less affected by particle size. There was no effect ofacid (HCl) strength on
the leaching rate. An increase in ferric concentration up to 0.25 M produced an increase in
the dissolution rate of the first stage but was independent of concentration beyond this
point. The addition of ferrous chloride to ferric chloride solutions showed the exact same
net increase that would have been found ifthe same amount offerric chloride had been used
instead. Use of ferrous chloride alone (ie. no ferric chloride) produced slow leaching.
Particle size fractions tested were 425-600 um, 150-300 um, and 75-106 um. These size
fractions were similar to the ones Sullivan studied. There was almost no difference observed
in the leaching rates, a result similar to that ofSullivan. Particle sizes of1.18-1.70mm and
2.36-4.76 mm produced much slower leaching rates. These were attributed to a larger
diffusion distance required by the copper to travel in the solid.
The most interesting observations of this study were based upon the X-ray diffraction
data. The results show that a whole range of intermediate non-stoichiometric copper
sulphide phases are formed as copper is leached out of the solid matrix. The basic chalcocite
crystal structure does not change until the copper level is below Cu 1 - g 9 1S which is outside the
digenite stoichiometric range. There appears to be a similar behavior as digenite transforms
to covellite. This could be caused by some local areas and particles becoming more depleted
ofcopper and achieving compositions at which phase transformations occur before others.
This would explain the mixtures ofphases observed.
The leaching of chalcocite and covellite was studied by Grizo et al. [20] at pH values
between 0.7 and 2 in the presence ofsulphuric acid and ferric sulphate. They divided the
leaching process into three stages. The three stages were identified by changes in kinetics
-28-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
41/123
from linear to non-linear and backto linear dissolution rates. This is unlike previousstudies
which divided the stages according to the formation of intermediate species such as digenite
and covellite. They do, however, suggest that during the second stage, leaching of
chalcocite, digenite and covellite is occurring in parallel. The activation energies were found
to progressively increase in each stage but the rise in activation energy is higher between the
second and the third stage. This increase in activation energy suggests a change in
mechanism from diffusion control to chemical kinetics control. An increase in particlesize
decreases the rate at which copper is leached but does not affect the kinetic mechanism in the
three stages. The leaching data on various particle size fractions were also found to show
that the second stage was controlled by the diffusion ofspecies through a product layer.
Cheng and Lawson [21] investigated the leaching ofsynthetic chalcocite and covellite
in oxygenated acidic sulphate-chloride solutions. The leaching was described in terms ofa
shrinking core model with the rate being surface chemical reaction controlled in the first and
second stages. The late second stage was accompanied by pore diffusion control. Elemental
sulphur formation on the surface of the particles was found to retard the dissolution rate
during covellite leaching.
Thomas and Ingraham [22] studied the kinetics of dissolution ofsynthetic covellite in
aqueous acidic ferric sulphate solutions via a rotating sintered disk technique in the
temperature range 25 to 80C. They identified two rate controlling steps. The first, below
60 C, was surface chemical reaction controlled and the second, at higher temperatures, was
solution transport controlled. The respective activation energies were 92 kj/mol and 33
kj/mol. The leaching rate was directly proportional to the ferric concentration below 0.005
M but not sensitive to higher ferric sulphate concentrations.
Dutrizac and MacDonald [23] also studied the dissolution of synthetic CuS and
high-grade natural covellite in the temperature range 25 to 95C in acidified ferric sulphate
solutions. They found little difference in the leaching rate between natural and synthetic
covellite. Other leaching observations were similar to those of Thomas and Ingraham [22].
-29-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
42/123
2.4.3 Electrochemical Studies
A number of researchers have investigated the electrochemical dissolution of copper
sulphide ores and mattes in order to develop a process for the direct electrorefining ofthese
materials. Etienne [24] studied the electrochemical aspects ofaqueous oxidation of copper
sulphides using rotating diskanodes of digenite and chalcocite. The results showed that the
rate of chalcocite oxidation was under the control of diffusion of the cupric ions through the
solution in the pores of the covellite-sulphur product layer. Etienne also explained the cause
oflarge overpotentials observed by many researchers that occurred at some time into the
electrolysis process. She theorized that the polarizations causing the overpotentials were
due to the precipitation of copper sulphate in the pores formed from the leaching of copper
out of the matrix. This blocked the transfer ofcurrent to the reactive surface siteswhere the
electrolyte contacts the solid surface thus setting up a high electrical resistance.
Biegler and Swift [25] also investigated the dissolution of copper sulphide anodes and
the results supported Etienne's theory for the cause of the polarization. They also used other
electrolytes besides copper sulphate and found that the time at which polarization occurs is
directly related to the time at which the hmit of solubility of the copper salt in the solution is
reached. They also noted that the structure of the product layer is poorly understood and
further investigation of the non-equilibrium products formed during dissolution would be
required to understand the leaching process.
The study of the mechanism of the anodic dissolution ofCU2S was performed in the
presence ofsulphuric acid under galvanostatic and potentiostatic conditions by Winand et
al. [26]. In all cases, a layer of digenite, Cu : gS, was found to form on the surface according to
the following reported reaction.
SCu^S - 5CulxS+Cu2+ + 2e
A concentration gradient of copper was observed through the digenite layer. This digenite
layer stays at a constant thickness after the Cu 1;1S layer appears on the surface. The reaction
in this step was reported as
-30-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
43/123
3C,5 -> 4Cu1AS+Cu2+
+2e
Ifthe anodic potential is low during the electrolysis process, the next reaction proceeds as
follows
WCuLlS - llCu2+
+10.S+2r?
However, if the current density is sufficiently high to achieve a sharp increase in anodic
potential or the potential is kept high, the reaction path is given by the following two
reactions
lOCulAS -> \QCuS+ Cu2+ + 2e
followed by
CuS-+Cu2+
+S+2e
Furthermore, sulphate is also found to be formed to some extent at high anodic potentials
according to the following reactions.
CuS+AH20 - Cu2+ + S02-+W++8e
It must finally be noted that the formation ofa copper sulphate precipitate on the
surface was stated not to be the cause ofthe sharp rises in anodic potential observed in the
experiments because the calculated current density for such a film on the surface was a
factor of ten higher than the currentdensities used in the study.
McKay [27] studied the anodic decomposition ofcopper-rich mattes using particulate
electrodes. Anodic decomposition ofsynthetic chalcocite was defined as a three-stage
process according to the following reactions:
1. Cu^ -+Cu2_xS+xCu2+ + 2xe~, 1.75 < (2-x) < 1.83
2. Cu2_xS-+Cu2_yS+ {y-x)Cu2
*+2(y-x)e-, 0.7
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
44/123
Stage 1 is associated with crackformation along grain boundaries and in stage 2, the grains
begin to deteriorate as copper is depleted from them. Total-bed polarization occurs because
of the deterioration of the electrode and a reduction in conducting reaction interfaces
between the electrolyte and the solid surface due to sulphur formation in stage 3.
The electrochemical dissolution of copper sulphides was investigated by Hillrichs et
al. [28,29,30] through cyclic voltammetric methods. The anodic dissolution ofQ . S in
sulphuric acid pointed to three factors controlling the current density. These are, (a) solid
state diffusion through the CuS product layer, (b) pore diffusion in the product layerand (c)
resistance polarization due to CuS04 precipitation in the pores formed during dissolution.
The formation of a thin metastable copper oxide layer was also thought to affect the
dissolution of CuS. Further studies [29] confirmed the formation of this metastable,
non-stoichiometric copper oxide/hydroxide layer.
MacKinnon [31] investigated the anodic dissolution of chalcocite using a fluidised-bed
anode method. The intermediate formation of "blue-remaining" covellite (CuuS) was
observed. The dissolution process became inhibited after about 50% copper removal and
was accompanied by increased oxygen evolution on the platinum current distributor. This
inhibition was inferred to be caused by sulphur formation on the surface of the reactive sites.
-32-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
45/123
2.4.4 E h -pH Relationships and Phase Systems
Potential-pH diagrams show chemical equilibrium relationships for aqueous systems.
The plots are generated from hydrolysis and oxidation reduction reactions. Figures 2.15a
and 2.15b are E-pH diagrams for the Cu-S-H20 system at 25 and 100 "C generated at unit
activity for all species [32].
Figures 2.16a-b and 2.17 [32] are thermal precipitation diagrams to show shifts in
solution-solid equihbria with respect to temperature and pH.
Figures 2.18a-b [33] are phase diagrams for the Cu-S system to show the stability
ranges for the various species. This phase diagram does not show some of the metastable
phases that have been observed by many researchers.
-33-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
46/123
-34-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
47/123
Figure 2.16a-b Thermal precipitation diagrams for the CuSO 4-H 2S0 4-H 20 system [32].
-35-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
48/123
Figure 2.17 Thermal precipitation diagram for the CuSO^HjSCvHjO system at
100-CforaCiiJt = V . [ 3 2 ] .
-36-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
49/123
J20Cv,1i
r
1000 IN
8 0 0 -
r-x>l) is very fast compared to the
leaching ofCuS because the leach times to 20% consumption were less than 30 minutes and
-57-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
70/123
the remaining 4 hours of leaching were devoted mostly to CuS dissolution. The lower than
expected amount of basic copper sulphate observed can only be explained as result of the
reactions not occurring sequentially.
The most important result was that there was no slow leaching behavior exhibited in
the laboratory experiments. This result is consistent with other experiments done under
normal leaching conditions previously at INCO labs.
4.1.2 Iron and Arsenic
The iron is slowly leached into solution during the reaction time (Figure 4.6).
However, most of the iron in solution precipitates rapidly with the basic copper sulphate to
a stable level by the 25% oxygen consumption point. The level ofiron in the precipitate
begins to decrease slightly by the end of the leach process probably due to some iron being
resolubulized into the leach solution.
The role of iron in the leaching process is very important. As discussed in the
literature review section, iron was found to increase the leaching rates in most studies
primarily by acting as a charge carrier between the oxygen and the copper sulphide
particles. Iron is also thought to have an important affect on the precipitation behavior ofbasic copper sulphate. The experiments with no iron in solution showed some very
interesting behavior. The resulting basic copper sulphate slurry was much more viscous
and the agglomerate size of the precipitate was finer (see Figure 4.7). The rate of oxygen
consumption also slowed down considerably at approximately 15% oxygen consumption
and was very sensitive to stirring speeds. This suggests that gas-liquid mass transfer is
severely affected by the increased viscosity.
Arsenic in the solids is initially leached very quickly to the 5% oxygen consumption
point but then precipitates out to report to the releach solution (Figure 4.8). All the arsenic
that is leached out steadily for the remaining leaching time reports to the releach solution
and not to the leach solution. There appears to be an error in the assay ofthe releach solution
at the 5% point because the mass balance at this point does not add upto the total amount of
-58-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
71/123
Distribution ofIronAsa Function of Oxygen Consumption
3.0
3
$ 2.0
ID 1J
2
Leach Sol'n
Releach Sol'n
Solids
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent Oxygen Consumption (%)
Figure 4.6 Distribution ofiron during leaching.
arsenic in the system. The releach solution assay is thought to be incorrect because the
arsenic is expected to be in the leach solution before it can precipitate. The other reason that
this point is thought to be in error is because the results of the experiment with no iron in
solution show that arsenic first reports to the leach solution and then to the precipitate
beyond the 5% oxygen point (see assay results in Appendix C).
-59-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
72/123
(a) With Iron-xl 500 (c) Without Iron-xl 500
-60-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
73/123
Distribution ofArsenicAs a Function of Oxygen Consumption
3.0 |
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent Oxygen Consumption (%)
Figure 4.8 Distribution of arsenic during leaching.
4.1.3 Nickel and Cobalt
The leaching behavior ofnickel and cobalt is very similar (Figures 4.9 and 4.10). Both
metals leach very quickly and stay in the leach solution without any appreciable amount of
precipitation. Nickel leaches quickly in the presence ofacid and reaches a steady state by
20% oxygen consumption. Cobalt also leaches quickly in the presence ofacid but continues
to leach slowly until the end of the process. Neither metal is thought to affect the leaching
process significantly at the levels at which they are present in the system.
-61-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
74/123
1.0
Distribution ofNickelAsa Function of Oxygen Consumption
Percent Oxygen Consumption (%)
Figure 4.9 Distribution of nickel during leaching.
Distribution ofCobaltAsa Function ot Oxygen Consumption
-62-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
75/123
4.1.4 Additional Observations of Part A Experiments
The experiments done with excess arsenic in solution or using the "copper depleted"
cake yielded no unusual leaching behavior. Only the experiments done with high Cu/S
cakeand
no iron in the electrolyte showed significant differences in leaching behavior.
The experiments done with a high Cu/S ratio cake showed significant sensitivity to
agitation speed and the slurries were higher in viscosity due to more basic copper sulphate
being formed. The higher viscosity observed was not measured but was just based on visual
observations in comparison to other experiments.
The effect of no iron in the original electrolyte was discussed earlier and reported as
having a significant effect on the viscosity probably as a result of the finer precipitateformation. After six hours of leaching time, there was 4 times as much unleached material
as expected with copper sulphides still appearing in the x-ray diffraction results (see Table
4.1). The slow leaching in these experiments appears to be more a function ofhigh viscosity
and therefore mixing/gas-liquid mass transfer rather than chemistry. It must be noted that
the "no-iron" condition is almost impossible in the plant because there is always significant
levels ofiron present in the spent electrolyte and entrained in the first stage cake liquor.
4.2 Part B: Kinetic Experiments
The part B experiments can be divided into 2 sections; those performed with and without
acid in solution. The two types of experiments must be considered distinct because they take
different reaction paths in the leaching of chalcocite. For this reason, the originally suggested
factorial design analysis was not carried out on the results. The experiments done with acid in
the initial solution are not very representative of the leaching path in the plantbecause the acid
is present during the whole leaching time in these experiments. The leaching rates that are of
interest are the ones in which the acid is depleted early in the process.
-63-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
76/123
The leaching rate versus percent oxygen consumption plots areprovided inAppendix D
for the acid and no-acid experiments. These graphs were generated by subtracting the blank
experiments (no solids added) from the actual experiments to obtain net rates. The "loops"
formed at the initial part of the plot are caused by the subtraction of the two runs.
The experiments that begin with acid in solution proceed initially via reaction 1 where
Cu xS is converted to CuS. This is followed by the leaching ofCuS via reaction 5. However,
reaction 4 must occur to a limited degree because some of the sulphur is oxidized. The chemical
analyses of the leach residues contained approximately 90% sulphur and the x-ray diffraction
results show very strong elemental sulphur patterns. The degree ofsulphur oxidation is shown
in Table 4.2 for the various runs performed with acid. It should be noted that those experiments
with no copper and/or iron in solution showed higher levels of sulphur oxidation. This is
consistent with the work done by Mao and Peters [13]. They found that the presence ofiron
lowered the levels of sulphur oxidation. They observed 90.6% elemental sulphur in their
residues, values very similar to the ones observed in these experiments. All of the sulphur was
found to oxidize in the experiments done with no acid in the solution.
The times taken to 10,15 and 20% oxygen consumption are given in Table 4.3. They show
very clearly that the initial leaching rates are very fast where CuxS is being converted to CuS.
The time to 20% oxygen consumption is usually less than 3 minutes and is a very short duration
relative to the total reaction time of most ofthese experiment of 2.5-3 hours. This initial rapid
leaching of chalcocite is consistent with the work of Mao and Peters [13] as well as other
researchers.
-64-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
77/123
Table 4.2 Degree ofsulphur oxidation at various initial acid, copper and iron concentrations.
Cu/S [HjSOJ [Cu] [Fe] % Sulphur
Ratio (g/D (g/U (g/D OxidizedMedium 60 40 5 7.6
Medium 60 40 0 15.9
Medium 60 0 0 31.6
Medium 60 0 5 21.4
Medium 60 20 2.5 16.0
Medium 60 20 2.5 10.4
Medium 120 0 2.5 23.9
Medium 120 40 2.5 1.6
Medium 120 20 5 9.6Medium 120 20 0 28.4
Low 60 20 0 28.5
Low 60 0 2.5 26.6
Low 60 20 5 15.3
Low 60 40 2.5 15.4
In the experiments with no acid in the initial batch recipe, the material is expected to leach
via reaction 2 followed by reaction 4. The reactions are not expected to be entirely sequential as
the results ofpart A have indicated. In these experiments, all of the sulphur was to oxidize. The
times to 20% oxygen consumption are very fast in the no-acid experiments also.
The total leaching times in these experiments were much shorter than part A. This is most
likely due to the fact that the agitation speed was higher and the pulp density was lower
contributing to better mixing and much higher gas-liquid mass transfer rates.
-65-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
78/123
Table 4.3 Time taken to leach to 10, 15 and 20% oxygen consumption at various initial
acid, copper and iron concentrations.
Cu/S [HjSOJ [Cu] [Fe] Time (s) to %consumptionRatio ( g / U ( g / u (g/D 10% 15% 20%
Medium 0 20 5 90 142 305
Medium 0 0 2.5 100 175 334
Medium 0 40 2.5 80 105 186
Medium 0 20 0 162 332 499
Medium 60 40 5 78 92 107
Medium 60 40 0 89 110 143
Medium 60 0 0 84 110 174
Medium 60 0 5 95 109 122Medium 60 20 2.5 115 129 146
Medium 60 20 2.5 90 108 129
Medium 120 0 2.5 168 284 306
Medium 120 40 2.5 83 98 116
Medium 120 20 5 100 116 137
Medium 120 20 0 90 113 141
Low- 0 20 2.5 230 399 559
Low 60 20 0 137 250 640Low 60 20 2.5 89 105 125
Low 60 20 5 92 110 136
Low 60 20 2.5 132 152 180
4.3 Part C: Leaching CuS in the presence of basic copper sulphate
Figures 4.11 and 4.12 show the oxygen consumption rates at regular intervals during the
leaching ofCuS in the presence of basic copper sulphate. The rate of oxygen consumption at
low copper concentrations, between 1 and 10 g/L, appears to be slower. A minimum point
probably exists somewhere in this range but it is not possible to depict without more data. This
dip in rate is apparent in both the experimental conditions of iron and no-iron in solution.
Beyond the minimum point, the rate of oxygen consumption (CuS leaching) generally appears
-66-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
79/123
to be copper catalyzed and increases with increasing copperin solution.
Oxygen Consumption RateAlVarious Copper Concentrations
0.0 I 1 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 ' 0.00 20 40 60 80
Initial Copper Concentration (g/L): [Fe]=0.25
Figure 4.11 Oxygen consumption rate at various initial copper concentrations with initial
[Fe]=0.25 g/L. Each curve represents a different level of oxygen consumption.
Comparing the leaching rates of experiments done with and without iron in solution, it
appears that iron in solution increases the leaching rate. Appendix F contains plots ofrates at
various oxygen consumption points with and without iron in solution. There is a crossover of
rates between the 0 and 10 g/L Cu points.
Table 4.4 and Figure 4.13 show that increases in the initial copper concentration or iron
concentration results in an increase in the oxidation-reduction potential (ORP). This is
consistent with the Nernst equation, e.g.:
-67-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
80/123
Figure 4.12
Oxygen Consumption RateAt Various Copper Concentrations
20 40 60
Initial Copper Concentration (g/L): [Fe]=0
10%20%30%
40%50%60%70%80%
Oxygen consumption rate at various initial copper concentrations with initial
[Fe]=0 g/L. Each curve represents a different level ofoxygen consumption.
Cu2+ + e'^Cu+
R T [Cu+
1EL = E - I n -
1
nF [Cu2+]
A higher solution potential will tend to increase the leaching rate by imposing a higher
exchange current on the mineral. Figure 4.14 shows a schematic of an Evans E>iagram of the
possible polarization curves during CuS leaching. The reversible potential ofCuS leaching as
shown on Figure 4.14 at 388 Kis approximately 0.21 V. The actual ferric and cupric polarization
curves will be a result of the mixed potential caused by both iron and copper in solution. Theiron in solution is reported to be easily oxidized from ferrous to ferric in the presence of copper
as the cupric-cuprous couple is thought to catalyze the oxidation of the ferrous species [36].
-68-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
81/123
The increase in the leaching rate observed at higher copper concentrations and higher iron
concentrations is now more understandable. The increase in the cupric/cuprous, ferric/ferrous
ratios or a net increase of the cupric or ferric concentrations will increase the mixed solution
potential and as a result increase the anodic current (leaching rate).
The dip in the solution potential, and consequently the leaching rate, observed at
approximately 10 g /L copper concentration was not explainable. This point is not likely to be
in error because it occurs in both the experiments (ie. [Fe]=0 and [Fe]=0.25 g/L).
Table 4.4 Potential and pH measurements of the leach slurry after leaching
and the approximate temperatures at which they were measured.
Initial Initial pH ORP (mV) Temperature CO
[Cu] (g/L) [Fe] (g/L)
0 0.25 2.84 350 80.1
1 0.25 2.79 353 77.9
10 0.25 2.53 319 81.5
40 0.25 2.51 491 84.6
80 0.25 2.43 499 83.0
0 0 2.78 314 85.9
1 0 2.68 360 82.9
10 0 2.50 321 84.0
40 0 2.68 445 86.9
80 0 2.43 449 85.1
-69-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
82/123
>E
550.0
500.0 -
g 450.0 -
ocug 400.0 -
o350.0
300.0
Solution Potential
at Various Copper Concentrations
10 20 30 40 50 60Initial Copper Concentration (g/1)
80
Figure 4.13 The effect ofinitial copper concentration on the measured ORP at [Fe]=0 and
[Fe]=0.25 g/L.
Evans Diagram Schematic ofApplicable
PolarizationsCurves During CuS Leaching
1.0
0.8
0.6
o
> 0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
Increasing ferric or cupric ion
concentration
CuS+ 4HjO-- Cu + SO*+ 8H++ 8e_
Log I - Galvanic Current (Schematic)
Figure 4.14 Evans diagram ofapplicable polarization curves during pressure leaching of
CuS (schematic).
-70-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
83/123
4.3.1 Discussion ofORP Measurements
Since there is a small amount ofsolids present in the slurry when the ORP is measured,
the value obtained is really a "mixed potential" because it is affected byboth the solids
present and the prevailing solution conditions. However,since the solids concentration is
very low in the part C experiments, the measured ORP value is much closer to the solution
potential. A simple calculation shows that the solid potential changes very little as a result
of the change in copper concentration.
The equilibrium reaction is:
Cu2+ + SOl~ + 8/Y+ + &e CuS+ 4H20
This potential will vary as a function of[Cu2+]:
ie RT 1' E = E- 2.303log
a
Cu**
a
*-a
+
And assuming: asol- = aCuit
2.303(8.314) (298.15), 2 2.303(8.314) (298.15) E = E +
8 965001l 0 g a
(96500)p H
E = E+ 0.0148 \ogaCult - 0.059\6pH
Therefore, the "solid potential" will vary by -15 mV per order ofmagnitude change in
copper concentration.
The cathodic reaction is:
02 + 4ht+4e -*2H20
However, it is also possible for other reactions to catalyze the reaction:
Fe3+
+ e -> Fe2+
Cu2+
+ e -> Cu
-71-
-
7/27/2019 UBC_1991_A7 G73.pdf
84/123
The observed changes in the ORP measurements are large (Table 4.4). However,
according to the calculation above, the "solid potential" can only change by -15 mV per
order of change in the Cu 2 + concentration. It is therefore more likely that the observed
change in the ORP measurement is a result of the Cu 2 + /Cu + and/or Fe 3 +/Fe 2 + couples. An
increase in potential ofthese couples increases the rate of electrochemical dissolution and
hence increases the rate ofleaching. This observation is important since it indicates that the
levels of copper and iron in solution are important as catalysts and. may be serving as
surrogate oxidants.
4.4 Comparison ofLeaching Rates - Part A and Part C
A comparison of leaching rates between part A and part C experiments was performed todetermine an empirical relationship between them (see Table 4.5). The main difference between
these experimental section was the pulp density and agitation speeds. The comparison ofrates
is done at 60and 70% oxygen consumption for the following reasons:
1. The copper concentrations are similar in these experiments.
2. The predominant material (solids) remaining is CuS.
3. The flow rates are extremely stable and are not affected by initial transients.
4. There is no manual oxygen flow control, as was practiced in the early stages of the
part A experiments4.
Ifthe ratio ofrates is taken between these two parts, it can be seen that the rate of leaching
is 4.5 and 4.2 times as high in the 60% and 70% runs respectively in the part C experiments. This
lends further credence to the fact that the rates must be dependent upon agitationand/or pulp