Transcript
Page 1: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

Utility Customer Services Delinquent Accounts Audit

May 18, 2015 City Council Workshop Meeting

Page 2: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

Why did we do this audit?

500,000 transactions per year for $141 million

Questions the audit answers?

1. Are utility accounts managed effectively to maximize collections?

2. Is the city’s collection agency properly managed?

3. Does the city have adequate procedures to minimize the risk of theft?

Page 3: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

Why did we do this audit?

500,000 transactions per year for $141 million

Questions the audit answers?

1. Are utility accounts managed effectively to maximize collections?

2. Is the city’s collection agency properly managed?

3. Does the city have adequate procedures to minimize the risk of theft?

Page 4: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

Why did we do this audit?

500,000 transactions per year for $141 million

Questions the audit answers?

1. Are utility accounts managed effectively to maximize collections?

2. Is the city’s collection agency properly managed?

3. Does the city have adequate procedures to minimize the risk of theft?

Page 5: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

Why did we do this audit?

500,000 transactions per year for $141 million

Questions the audit answers?

1. Are utility accounts managed effectively to maximize collections?

2. Is the city’s collection agency properly managed?

3. Does the city have adequate procedures to minimize the risk of theft?

Page 6: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit
Page 7: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

What is paid? What is sent to collections?

0.86%

0.65%

0.54%

0.43%

$134,000,000

$136,000,000

$138,000,000

$140,000,000

$142,000,000

$144,000,000

2011 2012 2013 2014

Payments Amount to Collections

Page 8: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

Accounts Sent to Collections (percent of total 8/12-7/14)

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Owners Tenants Contractor Unlabeled

Page 9: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

Customer Payment Methods (in thousands)

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Mail Internet Bank Draft Counter Department Wire Other

2012 2013 2014

Page 10: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

Customer Payment Methods (in thousands)

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Mail Internet Bank Draft Counter Department Wire Other

2012 2013 2014

Page 11: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

“If you know how to beg, we have an opening in our Collections Department.”

Page 12: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

Invoice & Delinquent Payment Dates Gaps

Gap No. Accounts %Less 1 month 183 26%1-2 months 214 30%2-3 months 71 10%3-6 months 124 17%

6-12 months 53 7%1-2 years 37 5%2-3 years 20 3%3+ years 12 2%

Total 714 100%

Page 13: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

Accounts Missing from MVBA’s Records

Yr-Mnth to Collections

Non-reconciled

Total Amount

Average Amount

2012 10 $5,908 $591

2013 4 $1,796 $449

2014 14 $3,769 $269

Total: 28 $11,472 $410

Page 14: UCS Delinquent Accounts Audit

Top Related