20
17
© C
IC e
ner
giG
UN
E. 2
01
7 A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d
Unexpected negative impact of additives on degradation mechanisms in commercial
Graphite/NMC lithium-ion pouch-cells
E.Bekaert§, F. Aguesse§, T. Waldmann*, M. Kasper*, N. Ghanbari *, C.
Chabrol#, S. Genies#, B. Pilipili Matadi#, L. Daniel#, M. Wohlfahrt-
Mehrens*
34th International Battery Seminar &
Exhibit
Fort Lauderdale, 23rd March 2017
§
*
#
1
2
1. CIC EnergiGUNE
2. Motivation
3. Batteries post-test analyses
4. Cell Characteristics
5. Analysis of the components
6. Proposition of degradation mechanism
7. Conclusion
Opening Date: Sept 2011
About 80 researchers
Electrochemical and Thermal Energy Storage
3
Where are we...?
Vitoria-Gasteiz, capital of the Basque Country
Basic research Applied research Industrial dev.
CIC Visioning… Mission & vision definitionR&D value chain: CIC´s role and cooperation scheme in the Basque Environment.
UNIVERSITIES
TECH. CENTRES
Ma
in p
laye
rsPa
rtn
ers
COMPANIES
TECH. CENTRES
UNIVERSITIES
TRL1-3 TRL 4-5 TRL 6-84
5Confidential
✓ Synthesis laboratories (solid state and organic chemistry)
✓ Characterization laboratory (ICP-AES, TGA/DSC, FTIR, UV-vis…)
✓ Platforms (solid state NMR, XRD, EM…)
✓ Testing laboratory (potentiostats, Maccor, climatic chamber)
✓ Dry room (prototyping)
✓ Computational studies group
Research infrastructure:
CIC Visioning… top research facilities
Role of the storage - complexity of applications
Interdisciplinary of the energy storage
6
Scales of Power
10000
1
10
100
1000
10k10 100 1k 100k
Cu
rren
t (A
)
Voltage (V)
Consumer Products
Aerospace
Military
Traction
Ships
UtilityHybrid Electric
Vehicles
Utility
Performance and Aging will be different for each single type of device, for each application and technologies.
* Courtesy of US DOT
7
Post –Mortem analyses for validation
Motivation What is the driving force for post-mortem analysis?
❖ Better understanding of the reasons of a battery failure
❖ What are the main aging degradation mechanisms ?
❖ How can we use this knowledge to improve cell manufacturing ?
❖ Determination of the condition of use for an extended life.
8
Batteries post-test analysisCritical steps for efficient analysis
1º) Observe
2º) Open
3º) Analyse
First aging before opening :
Steps for post-test analysis* :
▪ Calendar aging vs cycling aging
▪ Different SOC, DOD
▪ Cycling environment (temperature, humidity,
etc.)
9 * T. Waldmann and al J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016 volume 163, issue 10, A2149-A2164
Cell Characteristics Li-ion battery for high performance application
Selected system :
❖ NMC/graphite chemistry
❖ 16 Ah nominal capacity
❖ Pouch-cell
Separator:Z-folding
Stack of electrode
➢ Pristine battery as received from the manufacturer➢ 29 cells calendar aging
Selected cells for post-test:
Post test cells were chosen on the resultof the aging
10
Post test study: Pristine cell
• Flaky graphite• no core-shell structure• SEI on top of electrode (not visible in SEM)
• spherical layered oxide + graphite• Lix(Ni0.41Mn0.37Co0.22)O2
• no core-shell structure• polycristalline material
• separator: Polyethylene• main electrolyte components
11
11
Pristine: electrolyte composition
Main Solvant :
EC: Ethylene Carbonate
EMC : Ethyl Methyl Carbonate
Additives➢ 7%wt BP: Biphenyl (overcharge protection)
➢ 5%wt FEC: Fluoroethylene carbonate (SEI stabilisation)
➢ 2%wt VC: Vinylene carbonate (SEI stabilisation)
➢ 0.1%wt PS: Propane Sultone ( thermal stability)
1M LiPF6 in EC/EMC (1/1) + additives :
12
Cell aging: Degradation of the performances during calendar aging
SOH based on CC-CV capacity measurement during Check Ups at 25ºC
Trends:SOH vs. time decreases faster with• higher SOC• higher temperature
13
Post-test cell:
5ºC - SOC=100%
25ºC - SOC=100%
45ºC - SOC=100%
60ºC - SOC=100%
Influence of the temperature duringcalendar aging:
T[ºC] SOC[%] 50 90 100 Total
60 x2 x2 x3 7
45 x2 x3 x3 8
25 x3 x3 x3 9
5 x2 x3 5
Total 9 8 12 29
Aging Evaluation of the electrodes:
By comparing the resistance R* of the semi-loop
14
No changefor E+
Increase ofresistancefor E-
✓ Interfacial impedance ↗ for the negative electrode✓ The positive electrode impedance is approximately constant
Deterioration of the graphite resistive properties is evidenced.Interfacial impedance increase is related to :- SEI growing- Li-plating deposit
Pag. 15
Battery opening and first analysisVisual observations
Fresh cell5ºC/ SOC=100% 25ºC/
SOC=100%45ºC/
SOC=100%
60ºC/ SOC=100%
Po
siti
veN
ega
tive
Sep
arat
or
color changes of cathode in case of Li deposition on anode
Li deposition
uncolor area of separator
15
Battery opening and first analysisOrigin of Lithium deposition*
Li deposition
No Li deposition but uncolor area
with Check Ups
Without Check Ups
Gas Evolution Under Temperature
16* A. Iturrondobeitia and al, Post-Mortem Analysis of Calendar Aged 16 Ah NMC/Graphite Pouch Cells for EV Application, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, submitted
Positive Electrode: XRD
17
SEM :
17
✓ no relevant structural changes✓ no trace of cubic phase (NMC
cycling aging)✓ Lattice parameter variation in
agreement with literature*
✓ no morphological changes or alteration✓ some particles present cracks
✓ decrease of Li on cathodes✓ decrease of Mn on anodes
17
ICP-OES:
Negative Electrode:
✓ increase of Li on anodes✓ presence of Mn on anodes
XRD
18
SEM anode:
18
✓ no relevant structural changes✓ no significant enlargement of the line (002) of
graphite✓ White deposite recover:decomposition
products due to side reaction during aging such as Li2CO3, LiF, Li3PO4 or Li4P2O7
✓ growth of the layer on top of the stable SEI
ICP-OES:
Li
P
O
C
Cu
Depth [µm]
Inte
nsi
ty (
a.u
.)
surf
ace
bu
lk
colle
cto
r
Depth-resolved multi-elemental analysis
Grimm-type discharge source
Calibration necessary~ 1 µm/min
2.5 mm
a) ECS Electrochem. Lett. 4 (2015) A100–A102.b) J. Phys. Chem. C. 120 (2016) 22225–22234.19
Development of GD-OES method for graphite anodes
Aging mechanism of calendar aging(Kokam Cell, 45ºC+60ºC, SOC=100%)
No metallic
Li
13.38 mass%
metallic Li
Calendar aging tests at 60°C
No metallic
Li
4.50 mass%
metallic Li
Calendar aging tests at 45°C
✓ Graphite electrodes harvested after calendar aging tests showed local white depositions.
✓ Performing GD-OES on different positions of each electrode revealed local deposition of metallic Li.
✓ Metallic Li is estimated across the first micrometer (based on the previously defined assumption).
a) ECS Electrochem. Lett. 4 (2015) A100–A102.b) J. Phys. Chem. C. 120 (2016) 22225–22234.
Quantities are normalized regarding the quantity of EC
✓ Dismutation of EMC DEC + DMC
✓ Degradation of EC in EGMC
Analysis of electrolyte:Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
21
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
EC+EMC+othercarbonates
VC FEC BP 1,3-PS
fresh
cal at 25°C
cal at 45°C
Biphenyl (BP) is stronglyconsumed
Analysis of electrolyte:
Quantities are normalized regarding the quantity of EC
0%
3%
5%
8%
10%
13%
VC FEC BP 1,3-PS
fresh
cal at 25°C
cal at 45°C
Gas evolution
22
Influence of Biphenyl additive
23
Biphenyl: (BP)✓ overcharge protection agent✓ irreversible electrochemical reaction in oxidation
BP polymerises on the cathode during overcharge and the liberated protons (H+)
migrate to the anode, generating hydrogen gas (H2)
Proposition of degradation mechanism:1. Initially homogeneous current repartition on the whole surface of the negative electrode during charge/discharge cycles performed at the beginning of the aging.
2. Storage of the cell at a state of charge of 100% and at high temperature
3. Degradation of electrolyte during the storage (high Tº, high Voltage)
4. Production of gas bubbles
5. Mask/isolation of zones on the surface of the graphite
6. Realization of the first intermediate check up to evaluate the loss of capacity : inhomogeneous current repartition on the surface of the graphite electrode during charge and discharge processes : concentration of the polarization on the border of the bubble
7. Appearance of Li-Plating on the border during charge processes
25
Electrochemical characterisation:
Bottom
NMC φ 14mm
Separator φ 18mm
Gasket
Lithium φ 16mm
Spacer
Spring
Top
Electrolyte LP30
2032 coin-cell design
Li/NMC
26
Electrochemical characterisation:
Bottom
Graphite φ 14mm
Separator φ 18mm
Gasket
Lithium φ 16mm
Spacer
Spring
Top
Electrolyte LP30
2032 coin-cell design
Li/Gr
Conclusion
27
Lessons learned: ✓ Main aging mechanism on anode side✓ Check-ups can influence calendar aging tests
✓ Interfacial impedance increase with temperature✓ Lithium deposition during the Check Ups at 25ºC✓ Growth of SEI on anode✓ Dissolution of Mn from cathodes / migration to anodes✓ Consumption of cyclable Li in anode SEI, less Li in cathode, less Li intercalated in an anode✓ Consumption of Biphenyl additive. ✓ Gas evolution due degradation of additives✓ Formation of Inert area
Post-Test Analysis:Multidisciplinary approach :✓ Better understanding of the reasons of a battery failure✓ Determine the main aging degradation mechanisms✓ Provide knowledge to improve cell manufacturing✓ Determination of the condition of use for an extended life.
Li pouch Cell NMC/G:Main degradation phenomena concern the anodes
28
Team involved:
Project ManagerDr. Lise Daniel
Disassembling & Electrochemicalcharacterization:Dr Sylvie GenièsDr. Isabel Gordeons-JimenésGrégory Si LarbiDavid Brun-Buisson
Support in all Characterizations:Bramy Pilipili Matadi PhD
XRD:Dr. Claude Chabrol
GCMS:Dr. Jean-Frederic Martin
7Li NMR:Dr. Michel Bardet
XPS/TOF-SIMS/AugerDr. Eric De Vito
Head of departmentDr. Margret Wohlfahrt-Mehrens
Project ManagerDr. Thomas Waldmann
Post MortemMichael Kasper
GD-OES method developmentNiloofar Ghanbari
Project ManagerDr. Emilie Bekaert
Post Mortem:Dr. Frederic AguesseDr. Amaia IturrondobeitiaDr. Emanuele Gucciardi
30
Thank youMuchas graciasEskerrik askoMerciDziękujęDhanyawaadM goiBarak llahu fikShukriyaYAKNIYELEY
Emilie Bekaert
Tlf.: (+34) 945 297 108
www.cicenergigune.comhttp://www.cicenergigune.com/visita-virtual/index.htmlVisita 360ºhttp://www.cicenergigune.com/en/areas-investigacion/infraestructuras/ Infraestructuras