Download - Unpicking Binaries

Transcript
Page 1: Unpicking Binaries

Unpicking Binariesor, how educators conceptualise & make decisions about openness

Catherine Cronin @catherinecronin #dlRN15 16/10/15

Stanford Memorial Church (Flickr)

Page 2: Unpicking Binaries

@catherinecronin

slideshare.net/cicronin

Page 3: Unpicking Binaries

#mar

ref

Twitter photo: @HelenORahilly

Page 4: Unpicking Binaries

#HOM

ETOV

OTE

Page 5: Unpicking Binaries

openness & open education

Much published about benefits of and barriers to openness, as well as interpretations of openness. Relatively few studies provide empirical results.

Theoretical context for this study: openness and open educational practices as sociocultural phenomenon.

This perspective rejects the notion that such practices are deterministic and holds that, with adequate information and evidence, learners, instructors, and researchers have the agency to accept or reject any particular technology or practice or to find alternative uses for it that will better serve their needs.

- George Veletsianos (2015)

Page 6: Unpicking Binaries

my PhD research:

open educational practices (OEP) in higher education

Page 7: Unpicking Binaries

research questions

1. Why and how do faculty/academic staff in higher education use online tools and spaces for research, learning, and teaching?

2. Why and how do students and faculty/staff interact in open online spaces in higher education, and how do they negotiate their digital identities in these spaces?

research questions

Page 8: Unpicking Binaries

research questions

1. Why and how do faculty/academic staff in higher education use online tools and spaces for research, learning, and teaching?

2. Why and how do students and faculty/staff interact in open online spaces in higher education, and how do they negotiate their digital identities in these spaces?

research questions

Page 9: Unpicking Binaries

research methodology

Descriptive case study

Empirical setting: one university

Broad definition of ‘faculty/academic staff’ – includes full-time & part-time, permanent & temporary, contract & no contract

Phase 1. semi-structured interviews with 15-20 faculty/academic staff (constructivist grounded theory)Phase 2. questionnaire for all members of faculty/academic staff (1000+)

Page 10: Unpicking Binaries

digital engagement

digital literacies

digital identity

emerging themes

opennessanxiety

Page 11: Unpicking Binaries

“traditional” use of LMS, post lecture notes & readings

use of LMS invite student engagement in LMS, and/or beyond LMS

no social media; no SNS profiles

use of SNS, social media

use social media & SNS for research and/or for teaching

Digital Visitor engagement, “pull” information on request

network presence/activity

Digital Resident engagement, “push” notifications & active networking

digital engagement

Page 12: Unpicking Binaries

use Digital Natives discourse to describe students’ knowledge/ behaviour

awareness of digital literacies

encourage development of digital literacies for students/staff; teach/embed digital literacies

lament loss of analogue scholarly practices“I'm afraid of the future of

digital scholarly practices

value digital scholarly practices, design into courses & assessment“

digital literacies

Page 13: Unpicking Binaries

single online institutional hub“

online hub multiple online hubs, institutional as well as chosen/external (e.g. Academia.edu) and/or created (e.g. blog)“

strict boundary keeping professional/personal boundary

blended & flexible, accepts context collapse

digital identity

Page 14: Unpicking Binaries

little concern for copyright restrictions; little/no awareness of Creative Commons

copyright & open licensing

use OER, create OER, identify as open practitioner

privacy is important, focus on risks

privacy privacy is important, focus on management; or accepts lack of privacy

openness

Page 15: Unpicking Binaries

• institutional position, i.e. precarity

• anxiety at all levels of engagement with social media/SNS (irrespective of level of use), e.g. “Another Thing” to do

• unsure of institutional policy or position re: social media, communication with students, openness, etc.

• unmanageable workload

anxiety

Page 16: Unpicking Binaries

This University as anxiety machine.

This University as means for the production of anxiety.

This University that forces us to internalise the creation of value and the extraction of value and the accumulation of value.

This University that is recalibrated for value as we seek to resist in the name of teaching and learning and becoming and emancipation and us.

- Richard Hall (2015)

Page 17: Unpicking Binaries

unpicking binaries…

Page 18: Unpicking Binaries

‘Open’ is a continuous, not binary, construct. A door can be wide open, completely shut, or open part way. So can a window. So can a faucet. So can your eyes. Our common-sense, every day experience teaches us that ‘open’ is continuous.

- David Wiley (2009)

Openness is not the opposite of closed-ness, nor is there simply a continuum… not simply whether education is more or less open, but what forms of openness are worthwhile and for whom; openness alone is not an educational virtue.

- Richard Edwards (2015)

open vs. closed

Page 19: Unpicking Binaries

observationsto be explored further

• Use of OEP is relatively low, and uneven.

• Strong preference for Professional/Personal divide (individually defined & managed).

• ‘Digital Natives’ assumptions are persistent.

• Anxiety re: use of social media & maintaining a digital identity/presence exists widely: usage does not innoculate.

• Greater use of open tools & spaces by academic staff with less institutional security.

• Apparent lack of institutional understanding, recognition, policy/position, support re: OEP.

Page 20: Unpicking Binaries

Thank you!Catherine Cronin@catherinecronin

slideshare.net/cicronin

catherinecronin.wordpress.com

Image: CC BY 2.0 visualpanic

Page 21: Unpicking Binaries

ReferencesEdwards, Richard (2015). Knowledge infrastructures and the inscrutability of openness in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 251-264.

Esposito, Antonella (2015, September 25). PhD researchers using social media: Exploring the emergent trajectories of academic identities. SRHE presentation.

Hall, Richard (2014, March 19). On the University as anxiety machine. Richard Hall’s space. [blog]

Stewart, Bonnie (2015). In abundance: Networked participatory practices as scholarship. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3).

Veletsianos, George (2015). A case study of scholars’ open and sharing practices. Open Praxis, 7(3), 199-209.

Wiley, David. (2009, November 16). Defining “Open”. iterating toward openness. [blog]


Top Related