UnultiplyingWhole Numbers
UnultiplyingWhole Numbers
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
#5
Taking the Fearout of Math
81 ÷ 9
Division
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
Formulas as a Way to “Unite” Multiplication and Division
A rather easy way to see the relationship between multiplication and division is in
terms of simple formulas.
For example, we all know that there are 12 inches in a foot. Thus, to convert the
number of feet to the number of inches, we simply multiply the number of feet by 12.
next
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
As a specific example, to convert 5 feetinto an equivalent number of inches, we first notice that 5 feet may be viewed as 5 × 1 foot and we may then replace 1 foot
by 12 inches to obtain that 5 feet = 5 × 12 inches or 60 inches.
In terms of a more verbal description, the “recipe” (which we usually refer to
as a formula) may be stated as follows…
nextnext
Step 1: Start with the number of feet.
Step 2: Multiply by 12.
Step 3: Finally, replace feet by the number of inches.
nextnext
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
The verbal description above is easy to understand but cumbersome to write
(and it gets even more cumbersome as the“recipe” contains more and more steps).
The algebraic shortcut is to let a “suggestive” letter of the alphabet
represent the number of feet (perhaps the letter “F” because it suggests feet,
and similarly let a letter such as I to represent the number of inches (because it suggests inches).
Use the equal sign to represent the word “is”.
next
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
The verbal recipe and algebraic formula are shown below…
nextnext
Step 1: Start with a quantity, the number
of feet.Step 2: Multiply by 12
Step 3: Replace feet by inches and the
product is I.
F
F × 12 (or 12 × F)
F × 12 = I
English - “Recipe” Algebra
next
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
Because × and x are easy to confuse (especially when we’re writing by hand), we
do not use the “times sign” in algebra. Rather than write 12 × F we would write 12F (even if it were in the form F × 12, we would write 12F probably because of how natural it is to say such things as “I have 12 dollars”
as opposed to “I have dollars 12”).
Algebra Notes
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
It is also traditional to write the letter that stands by itself (namely, the
“answer”) to the left of the equal sign but this is not really vital. In any case
when we write I = 12F it is “shorthand” for the verbal situation
described in Steps 1, 2, and 3.
Algebra Notes
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
In studying algebra, many students are stymied by the symbolism. For whatever
reason, there seems to be an anxiety among many beginning students when letters are
used to represent numbers. Therefore, it is a nice transition (and it also highlights an
aspect of learning a language) to have students learn to translate “English” into “Algebra” and also from “Algebra” into English. Skill in being able to maneuver
easily between “English” and “Algebra” can go a long way in helping a student better
understand algebra.
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
In any case, the verbal process gives us an easy way to see the relationship between multiplication and division. Namely, when
we started with 5 feet, we multiplied 5 by 12 to get the number of inches.
On the other hand, if we started with 60 inches and wanted to know the number
of feet with which we started, we would have to realize that we obtained 60 inches
after we multiplied by 12.
next
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
We obtained 60 inches from 5 feet after we multiplied by 12. To determine the number of feet we started with, we must unmultiply by 12. Unmultiplying is actually division,
so 5 feet = 60 inches ÷ 12.
In more familiar terms, to convert 60 inches into feet, we divide 60 by 12.
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
The Division Algorithm for Whole Numbers
Again, we assume that the students know the standard algorithm for
performing long division.
next
What is not always clear to students is that division is really a form of rapid
subtraction.
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
Let’s look at a typical kind of problemthat one uses to illustrate a division problem.
next
A certain book company ships its books in cartons, each of
which contains 13 books. If a customer makes an order for
2,821 books, how many cartons will it take to ship the books?
For example, consider the following question…
next
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
To answer this question we divide 2,821 by 13 to obtain 217 as the quotient.
The usual algorithm is illustrated below.
next
1 3 2 , 8 2 12 6
2
2 2 1 3
1
19
7
9 1
nextnextnext
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
However, even if it is successfully memorized by students, this algorithm is
rarely understood by them. However, with a little help from our “adjective/noun” theme
the “mysticism” is quickly evaporated!
The “fill in the blank” problem we are being asked to solve is…
13 × ___ = 2,821
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
Since 13 × 2 = 26, our adjective/noun theme tells us that 13 × 200 = 2,6001
Hence, after we have packed 200 cartons, we have packed 2,600 books.
13 × ___ = 2,821
note
1 Since we also know that 13 × 300 = 3,900, we know that there aren't enough books left to fill an additional hundred cartons. In other words, at this stage we know that we need more than 200 cartons but less than 300 cartons in order to pack
the books.
next
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
Since we started with 2,821 books, there are now 221 (that is, 2,821 – 2,600)
books still left to pack.
Since 13 × 1 = 13, we know that 13 × 10 = 130.
next
Hence, after we pack an additional 10 cartons there are still 91
(that is, 221 – 130) books still left to pack).
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
Finally, since 13 × 7 = 91, we see that it takes 7 more cartons to pack the
remaining books.
Thus, in all, we had to use 217 (that is, 200 + 10 + 7) cartons.
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
We can now write the above result in tabulated form as shown below.
next
2 , 8 2 1 books2 6 0 0 books 2 0 0 cartons filled
2 2 1 books left 1 3 0 books 1 0 more cartons
9 1 books left7 more cartons9 1 books
nextnextnext
0 books left 217 cartons filled
next
–
–
–
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
The previous format is less familiar than the traditional algorithm, but it seems to better exhibit the “rapid, repeated subtraction” principle.
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
However, if we simply insert the “missing”
digits” into the traditional algorithm (they are emphasized in red type), we see
that the numbers in the emended version look
exactly the same as the numbers in the
previous format.
next
1 3 2 , 8 2 1 books2 6 0 0 books
2 0 0 cartons
2 2 1 books 1 3 0 books
9 1 books9 1 books
nextnextnext
0 books
nextnext
1 0 cartons7 cartons
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
In checking a division problem, we multiply the quotient by the
divisor, and if we divided correctly, the product we
obtain should be equal to the dividend. In terms of the
present illustration, the usual check is to show that
217 × 13 = 2,821, and we usually perform the check as
shown.
Notes
2 1 7× 1 3
2 1 7 06 5 1
2 8 2 1
next
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
The rows in the above multiplication (namely, 651 and 2170) have no relationship
to the three rows in the division shown in the above computation (2600, 130 and 91).
The reason is that the division problem showed us that if there were 13 books in
each carton, then 217 cartons would have to be used. On the other hand, the check by
multiplication showed that if there were 217 books in a carton, then 13 cartons would
have to be used.
Notes
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
However, a more enlightening way to
perform the check is to compute the product in the
less traditional but more accurate form 217 × 13.
Notesnext
1 3× 2 1 7
1 3 0 9 1
2 8 2 1
2 6 0 0
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
Indeed, when we do the problem this way we see an “amazing” connection between multiplication and division.
next
1 3 2 , 8 2 12 6 0 0
2
2 2 1 1 3 0
1
9 1
7
9 1
next
1 3× 2 1 7
1 3 0 9 1
2 8 2 1
2 6 0 02
note
2 We put in the 0’s for emphasis. That is, because the 6 in 26 was placed directly under the 8, and since the 8 was already holding the hundreds place, we did not need the two 0’s as place holders. We are not advocating that the above format replace the
usual long division algorithm, but rather that by using the above format a “few” times, the usual algorithm will seem more natural (or logical) to use.
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
Notice that when written in this form we see that the same three numbers we add to get the product (namely 91, 130 and 2,600 are the same three numbers
(in the reverse order) we subtract to find the quotient.
next
This illustrates quite vividly the connection between division and
multiplication as inverse processes.
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
Students often tend to be careless when it comes to keeping track of
place holders when doing division.
Closing Notes on the Adjective/Noun Theme
next
For example, given a problem such as
2,613 ÷ 13 they will often write.
1 3 2 , 6 1 32 6
2
1 3 1 3
1
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
With a little number sense they should see that this answer is not even
plausible because 13 ×100 is only 1,300 and 13 × 21 is less than 13 × 100.
Hence 13 × 21 is much too small to be equal to 2,613.
1 3 2 , 6 1 32 6
2
1 3 1 3
1
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
However, using our adjective/noun theme, we see that…
next
1 3 2 , 6 1 32 6 0 0
1 3 1 3
2 0 01
201 thirteen’s
1 thirteen
200 thirteen’s
nextnext
next
In our next presentation, we
introduce the concept of factors and
multiples.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
63 ÷ 9division