Transcript

Shaili GTraining Programme

“Urban Lake Conservation & Protection”

March 20th, 2013, Hyderabad

Urban Watershed Management

to Combat Climate Change

The city has cascade of lakes

which are in bad condition – 3084

lakes in HMDA’s core areas itself,

many more in peri urban areas

(data available – about 500)

Urban areas have lost several

lakes during the process of

development, which were earlier

natural sources of water for

agriculture and several other

economic activities.

Sewerage water is diverted in the

lakes which leads to pollution,

Ground water contamination and

diseases

Shadan hospital near Peerancherureleases Bio-medical wastes into the lake

Shamirpet Lake

Area : 486 ha

Shamirpet Lake

Area : 256.77 ha

230 Ha of land

under water got

reduced in 17

years

1989 2001

2005 2005

2009

Shamirpet

Lake

(classified map)

Water

Vegetation-1

Vegetation-2

Other classes

Source: SaciWATERs and IIIT Study, 2011, Forthcoming

Regulate local / micro climatic conditions

Keep surroundings cool

Regulate flood waters

Minimize economic loss due to flooding

Improve ground water recharging

Support aquatic life

Stop gap habitat for migratory birds.

Contribute towards natural remediation of waste

waters.

Silt controlling traps.

Slide curtsey: Jasveen Jairath,

2011

Increase in urban floods – extent and spread

Low recharge of GW

Vulnerability to droughts

Peri urban areas – deprived of corporation

services bare compounded brunt

Aggravated by gated affluent communities in PU

areas

Poor quantum and low quality

Slide curtsey: Jasveen Jairath,

2011

Local water body sources – replaced by distant

rivers – krishna, godawari, manjeera

Consequences – expensive, larger eco-footprints

Local self reliance of water – breaks down

Around 60% of HMDA is covered by formal water

supply – rest of the areas depend on GW – lakes

recharge GW

Community Involvement -

users of water supply and

management services

Participate in a project cycle

By

Assuming a responsibility,

Exercising an authority

Having control over the

management of water

services

For planning and execution of a given project

A method of understanding the community’s

issues

Helps in better community participation

Facilitates in identifying various stakeholders

Smoothens the flow of work

Technical assistance

Effective use of resources

Faulty lines

Unequal distribution

No proper operation

systems (on/off

switches)

Frequent electricity

cuts

Quality related issues

Mixing of water and

sewage lines

Transect walks

Random interaction with the people

Understanding the complexities of a heterogeneous

population

Identifying the vulnerable groups

Visiting them at their time of convenience

Detailed ethnographic study

Identifying key active members

Formation of committees and sub-committees

Interaction with the SHG members

1. Rapport building

Building contacts with the

government representatives, local

bodies such as Panchayat office,

community leaders, political

leaders, other key members

2. Awareness building activities

(with children, youth and adults)

Street plays, art and slogan

competitions for school children,

rallies

3. Meetings with all the

stakeholders

To identify their issues; to gain

traditional knowledge

4. Iterative sessions – Women,

landless and poor

Separate session to bring out

their perspectives

5. PRA exercises

FGDs, Timelines, Social

Mapping, Resource Mapping,

Water Mapping

6. Working groups co-ordination

Local governments, partner

NGOs, etc

7. Training and Capacity building

programmes

WASH practices, Water

harvesting, drip irrigation, use

of natural fertilizers, etc.

• Framing a lake management committee

• Operation and maintenance of the lake : SHGs, Identifying

a third party

• Regular public awareness: media, hoardings, organising

community vigilance meetings, Involving the local school

students

• Introducing certain resolutions: User fees, Ban on littering

around the lake etc;

• Community to play the role of “Watch Dogs” !!!

• Regular Capacity Building : Municipal Solid waste

management

The advantages linked to community involvement are:

Improves the outreach of the services

Time-saving

Recognition of work at community level

Programmes designed in accordance to community needs

Project management in the hands of community

TIME – most of them are unavailable during

working hours

Effective communication – language barriers

Identifying the right needs of the community

Have to satisfy everyone within the project goals

Projects implementation would be time

consuming

Identifying stakeholders representing diverse

communities

Influence of political parties

Communicating technical information in an easy to

understand manner

Capacity of the community to contribute to the

project management

After a period of time, the initial zeal in active

implementation fades away.

The community needs constant push in managing

their own resources

The community would expect immediate change and

positive impact

Consideration of landless and other poor people into the

planning process

The tools and approaches are to be developed which

would meet the needs of the communities

Ultimately all the users would get actively involved over a

period of time

Importance of the role of women

Community involvement is a highly affective method of a

change

Proper planning and implementation process is required for

enhanced community involvement.

The involvement is influenced by leadership and

responsibility.

Approaches/strategies should be localized for a better fit

into the environment.

Successful experiences should be disseminated.

Specific tools should be developed to support community

involvement in order to reduce the constraints.

Community participation improves the financial viability

and overall sustainability of the services


Top Related