Transcript
Page 1: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

USDOT “Talking Freight” Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

Establishing a National Freight Infrastructure Bank:Policy Issues & Program Design

David Seltzer

September 16, 2009

1629 Locust Street, Suite 100, Philadelphia, PA 19103 (Tel: 215-546-6801, Fax: 215-546-6803)

Page 2: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

Background

• Outgrowth of I-95 Corridor Coalition study (December, 2008)

– Evaluate the potential benefits of creating a new special purpose entity (SPE) to help advance major freight projects.

• Recent proposals to create a national-level SPE to help finance infrastructure, including:

– National Infrastructure Bank Act of 2007 (S. 1926, “Dodd-Hagel”)– National Infrastructure Development Act of 2009 (H.R. 2521

“DeLauro”)– Build America Bonds Act of 2009 (S. 2021, “Wyden-Thune”) – President Obama’s FY2010 Budget (National Infrastructure Bank)

2

Page 3: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

How to categorize freight projects?

• HUBS: Terminals where goods are transferred-- Intermodal or Intramodal.

• CORRIDORS: Longer Surface routes linking Hubs.

• CONNECTORS: “Last Mile” surface links between Corridors and Hubs, generally in metropolitan areas.

3

Page 4: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

Why has public funding for Freight been limited?

• Much of Freight Infrastructure is privately-owned.

• Intermodal Uses straddle existing Federal programs.

• Projects often span political jurisdictions, complicating institutional structure.

• Public “spillover” nature of benefits hard to measure—or monetize.

As a result, the Constituency for Freight Projects is Narrower than for Public Works.

4

Page 5: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

What problems are we trying to fix?

• Unavailable or expensive financing for projects?– Overcome “Market failure” b y providing loans and other

financing subsidies.

• Insufficient funding for projects?– Provide a deeper subsidy to reduce revenue requirements

for major projects with public benefits.

• What is the appropriate timeframe for federal assistance?– Near-term stimulus.– Longer-term shift in federal funding role.

5

Page 6: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

Why create a new Federal program for freight--

– Assist projects whose scale and complexity exceed state/local capacity.

– Overcome gaps in federal-aid eligibility.

– Provide “One-stop Shopping” for project sponsors.

– Target projects with major economic benefits regionally & nationwide.

– Enhance project selection at the federal level (focus on outcomes, not modes).

6

Page 7: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

-- and why create a new Special Purpose Entity (SPE)?

• Autonomy & Expertise may lead to improved Project Selection.

• Align the singular mission of SPE with a dedicated revenue stream to accelerate investment.

• Offer “One-Stop Shopping” with multiple tools to project sponsors.

• Take pressure off of states’ formula-funded programs by only handling largest projects.

7

Page 8: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

Why not instead authorize states to create regional entities?

– Projects of truly national significance should have national funding responsibility.

– National scope brings economies of scale and avoids dilution of effort at regional level (SIBs).

– Allows access to direct federal credit support:• Lower-cost source of financing.• Greater budgetary efficiency through fractional “scoring.”

-- Federal Tax Subsidies

8

Page 9: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

How big a program and how should it be funded?• AASHTO Freight Authorization Policy Statement :

– $42 billion additional funding for Goods Movement Infrastructure over 6 years (in addition to existing freight-related funding):

• $21 billion in Formula Funding to States• $21 billion in Discretionary Allocations (new $3.5 billion/yr. Program)

Funded by:– Increases in existing freight-related sources such as:

• Diesel Fuel Tax• Heavy Vehicle Use Tax

– New sources of dedicated freight-related fees such as:• Customs Duties• Container Tax• Surface Freight Waybill• Other?

– General Fund?

9

Page 10: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

10

What organizational form should the SPE take?

Special Purpose Entity’s Relationshipto the Federal Government

GovernmentalOwned and controlled by

the public sector

PrivateOwned and controlled by

the private sector

Government Dept./Agency

Government Corporation

GovernmentSponsored Enterprise

Private Non-Profit

Corporation

Dept. of Transportation

Rural Telephone

Bank, FDIC .

Fannie MaeFreddie Mac

Transportation Finance Corp.

(proposed)

Less Federal

Funded by U.S. govt. On-budget

Governing Board Fully or partially funded by U.S. govt. May be on- or off-budget.

Shareholder-owned For-profit Implied federal backing

Membership organization Not for profit

More Federal

Page 11: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

Why does the SPE’s organizational status matter to Federal

policymakers?

• Budgetary Scoring Treatment of NFIB’s Borrowing and Spending

• Treasury Concerns about:

– Cost-Effectiveness of Capital Raising Process

– Implied Federal Liability if SPE Issues Public Debt

– Competition with U.S. Treasury borrowing/Administrative burden

11

Page 12: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

What types of assistance should be offered?

12

Formula Grants

NATIONAL FREIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE BANK

Role of National Freight Infrastructure Bank

Existing Fuel& Vehicle Fees

Increments toExisting FreightRelated Fees

Highway Trust Fund (HTF)

DISCRETIONARYGRANTS

FEDERAL CREDIT(TIFIA & RRIF)

TAX CREDIT BONDS& PAB VOLUME

State/LocalFees

UserCharges

TransportationFinance

CorporationTax Credit BondNational Issuer

HighwayAccount

TransitAccount

Freight AccountState Freight Program

FHWA

Federally CharteredPrivate Non-Profit

(Wyden-Thune)

StatesTransit

Agencies

FTA

Freight InfrastructureTrust Fund (FITF)

Projects of Nationaland Regional Significance

New DedicatedFreight-Related

Fees

Increments toExisting FreightRelated Fees

Public or Private Projects(including freight rail)

Page 13: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

Potential Portfolio of Assistance

• The National Freight Infrastructure Bank (NFIB)– Receives $3.5 billion/year [$21 billion total] of revenues:

• ~$3.0 billion for Grants• ~$0.5 billion for Credit ~$5 billion of loans .

• NFIB selects projects > $[250] million for:– New Discretionary Grant program for projects with public benefits.– Expanded Federal Credit Program – Allocates Volume Cap under new $[25] billion Tax Credit Bond

program and expanded $[30] billion Private Activity Bond program.

---------------------------------------------------• Authorize States to establish the Transportation Finance Corporation

– Federally-chartered private non-profit corporation created to serve as nationwide non-federal issuing conduit for Tax Credit Bonds.

13

Page 14: USDOT "Talking Freight" Webinar—Institutional Arrangements

Other Policy Design Issues TBD

• Multi-purpose Bank to assist Freight, Intercity Passenger Rail and other major Surface Transportation Projects?

• Consolidate existing Federal credit programs (TIFIA and RRIF)?

• Part of Reauthorization or part of new Stimulus?

• Receive General Fund contributions?

14


Top Related