video laryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy
reuben j. strayer emupdates.com
video laryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy
reuben j. strayer
no disclosures / conflicts
indirect laryngoscopy
video laryngoscopy
direct laryngoscopy
traditional laryngoscopy
standard geometry blade
hyperangulated geometry blade
obsolete äbsəˈlēt adjective 1 no longer produced or used
direct laryngoscopy is not obsolete.
obsolete äbsəˈlēt adjective 1 no longer produced or used
but the traditional direct laryngoscope is slowly becoming obsolete.
the less experienced the operator, and the more difficult the airway, the bigger the advantage of VL over DL
endotracheal intubation is more likely to be successful with video
Sakles 2012 (1) Anderson 2011
Aziz 2012 Noppens 2012
Kory 2013 Sakles 2012 (2)
Aziz 2011 Brown 2010 Malik 2009
Serocki 2010 Griesdale 2012
Wayne 2010 Choi 2010
Serocki 2013 Kim 2013
Piepho 2011 Noppens 2010
with video, laryngoscopy is a team sport
video requires less force and patient repositioning than direct
Carassiti 2013 Russell 2011
video is crucial for supervising learners
it is easier to get good at video than direct
and video makes it easier to get good at direct
learn video first
Kory 2013 Nouruzi 2009
Hirabayashi 2010Herbstreit 2011
Ayoub 2010 Howard 2008
hyperangulation is not yes/no
the more angulated, the easier it is to see the glottis, the harder it is to deliver the tube
Levitan 2010
hyperangulation is not yes/no
the more angulated, the easier it is to see the glottis, the harder it is to deliver the tube
Levitan 2010
video laryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy
direct laryngoscopy is not obsolete but it is not optimal
video laryngoscopes with standard geometry blades allow direct and indirect techniques
the best airway device is between your ears-minh le cong
emupdates.com
