Download - Waveguide Losses and Input-output Coupling
-
1
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
EE 539BIntegrated Optics and Nanophotonics
2 Waveguide Losses and Input/Output Coupling
2.1 Losses in optical waveguides2.2 Waveguide input and output coupling
Integrated Optics Theory and Technology, by R. G. Hunsperger, 5th ed., Ch. 6-7, Springer Verlag.
-
2
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Loss Mechanisms
Scattering loss Predominates in glass or dielectric (such as
oxide) waveguides. Absorption loss
Most important in semiconductor and other crystalline materials.
Radiation loss Significant when waveguides are bent.
-
3
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Scattering Losses
Volume scattering loss Caused by imperfections Loss/unit length proportional to number of
scattering centers per length Depends strongly on the relative size of the
imperfections compared to in the material Volume scattering negligible compared to
surface scattering loss Surface scattering loss
-
4
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Surface Scattering Loss (I)More significant for higher-order modes.
mgR t
LN
=cot2
Number of reflections from each surface:
Exercise:A waveguide has tg = 3 m and n2 = 2.0. An optical wave with m = 0.8kn2 and = 900 nm propagates in the waveguide. How many reflections from each surface will the light experience for each cm traveled?
Convert loss coefficient to dB:
)cm( 3.4)cmdB(
)(
1-
0
=
=
L
zeIzI
-
5
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Surface Scattering Loss (II)
roughness surface of Variances :
)(4 ,
111
sincos
21
2
2/1223
212
223
23
221
21
31
'
'32
+
=
==
++
=
A
knkn
tA
gm
ms
s increases as increases. Higher order mode (smaller m) has higher surface scattering loss.In dielectric film waveguide, such as glasses and oxides, surface variation ~ 0.1 m s ~ 0.5-5 dB/cm.In semiconductor waveguides, thickness variation ~ 0.01 m. Surface scattering loss is negligible compared to absorption loss.
Ref: P.K. Tien, Appl. Opt. V. 10, 2395 (1971)
-
6
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Interband Absorption
Design wavguide material compositions so that the operating wavelength lies beyond the tail of the absorption curve to minimize interband absorption.
-
7
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Free-Carrier Absorption
-
8
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Loss Coefficient for Free-Carrier Absorption (I)
Motion of the free electrons under an applied electric field E0exp(jt)
)exp(*20
tjgj
meE
x
=
Nexp =1The displacement causes polarization
220
2
222
02
20
20
220
)*/()(
)*/()(
)*/()(
gmgNeK
ngmNenK
gjmNenK
i
r
+
=
=+
=
=And complex dielectric constant
n0: Index of refraction without the free carriers
mobilityElectron : *
-
9
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Loss Coefficient for Free-Carrier Absorption (II)
30
22
20
3
*)(4
cnmNe
nkK
KKk ir
ifc
=
=
Example: n-type GaAs at = 1.15 m
)cmin ( 10)(cm -318-1 NNfc
Complex dielectric constant Loss
-
10
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Radiation Loss (I)Main loss mechanism for curved waveguide.To preserve the phase front, the tangential phase velocity must be proportional to the distance from the center of curvature.
RX
dtdR
dtdXR
zr
z
r
0
0
0)(
=
=
=
+
Phase velocity > speed of light when X > Xr.
How far must the photons travel before they can be considered as having been removed from the guided mode?Coherent length:
1
2
2
=
aaZc
-
11
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Radiation Loss (II)
ct ZP
PdzzdP
zP11)(
)(1
=
P1: Power in the tail of the mode beyond Xr (i.e., the power to be lost by radiation within a length Zc)Pt: Total power
0
0
( ) cos( ) for 2 2
( ) cos( )exp ( ( / 2)) for | |2 2
a aE x E hx x
a aE x E h x a x
=
=
( )2 0 10
1 22 2
1 cos ( )exp 2 exp2
exp( )1 1sin( ) cos ( )
2 2 2
zha R aC C R
a haha ah
= =
+ +
-
12
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Lets pack 16 stages of modulatorsd
456
6810
Constraints: Spacing between waveguides at
least d Input and output cannot be on the
same side Waveguides cannot cross each other
3d
Scattering and absorption loss: 1 unit per d
Radiation loss (in units):
Whats the loss you obtain?
-
13
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
16 x 16 Thermo-Optic Switch
Use Mach-Zehnder interferometer configuration for 2x2 switch unit Insertion loss = 6.6dB
Thin-film heater3-dB directional
couplerI0 I1
I2
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )
coupler ldirectiona in the ratio couplingpower :2cos14
2sin2cos212
02
22201
kkkIIkII
=
+=
Apply heat to change refractive index: n/T(K) ~ 10-5
T. Goh, M. Yasu, K. Hattori, A. Himeno, M. Okuno, and Y. Ohmori, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.,June, 1998.
-
14
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Measurement of Waveguide Losses End-Fire Coupling to Waveguides of Different Lengths
12
21 )/ln(ZZPP
=
Q: Disadvantages?
-
15
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Measurement of Waveguide Losses Prism-Coupled Loss Measurement
Advantages: Non-destructive. Light can be selectively coupled into each mode by properly choosing the
angle of incidence.
-
16
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Coupling light into the waveguide and out of the waveguide incurs losses too.
Efficient coupling design is important.
-
17
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
General Definitions for Coupling Loss
PmPin z
x
Coupling efficiency to the m-th mode
in
mm P
P=
Q: A single mode optical beam is coupled into a waveguide with guiding core dimension a few times larger than the wavelength. What kind of modes will be generated in the waveguide?
Coupling loss (dB)
m
in
PPlog10=L
-
18
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Direct Focusing
modeth -m theofon distributi Field :),(beamincident theofon distributi Field :),(
),(),(
),(),(22
2*
yxByxA
dxdyyxBdxdyyxA
dxdyyxByxA
m
mm
=
In most cases, A(x,y) can be represented by Gaussian beams.
-
19
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
TEM0,0 Gaussian BeamWavefront changeBeam spreading
2
00 1)(
+=zzWzW
phase Radial )(2
)(exp
phase alLongitudin tanexp
factor Amplitude )(
exp)(
)(
22
0
1
2
220
0
+
+=
zRyxkj
zzkzj
zWyx
zWWArA Beam radius
+=
201)(zzzzR Radius of curvature
of the wavefront
20
0Wz Rayleigh range
Q: Which factor affects the coupling most?
Ref: Verdeyen, Laser Electronics, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall.
-
20
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Gaussian Beam Through a Thin Lens
-
21
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
End-Butt CouplingExact coupling efficiency can be obtained by overlap integrals.
Approximation: (assuming all waveguide modes are well confined, and )Lg tt
+
+
+=
2cos
)1(1
12
cos)()1(
64 222
2222
mtt
tmtt
tnnnn
m Lg
L
gL
g
gL
gLm
-
22
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Misalignment EffectLongitudinal misalignmentLateral misalignment
2 ,for cos2
0
gLLg
L
ttXtt
tX
PP
-
23
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Tapered Mode Size Converters
-
24
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Prism CouplersAir-waveguide coupling
Phase-matching condition
mm kn = sin1cannot be satisfied.
Prism-waveguide coupling
Phase-matching condition
mpm kn = sin
can be satisfied.(Assuming normal incidence to the prism.)
-
25
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Example: Output Prism CouplerA prism coupler with index np = 2.2 is used to observe the modes of a waveguide. The light source is a He-Ne laser with 0 = 632.8 nm. If the light from a particular mode is seen at an angle of 26.43 with the normal to the prism surface, what is the propagation constant m for that mode?
Q: What is the interaction length required to obtain complete coupling?
-
26
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Coupled-Mode Theory
L
2: Coupling coefficient (depending on overlap integral
between the prism mode and the waveguide mode)
L =
=
=2cos m
WL
For a given L, the coupling coefficient required for complete coupling:
Wm
2cos
= Q1: What defines W?Q2: What will happen if L > /2?
-
27
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Notes on Prism Coupling In order to get 100% coupling with a uniform beam, the trailing edge
of the beam must exactly intersect the right-angle corner of the prism.
Disadvantages For most semiconductor waveguides, m ~ kn2 Difficult to find
prism materials
Incident beam must be highly collimated Coupling efficiency sensitive to the separation between the prism
and the waveguide
-
28
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Grating Coupler
0
Periodic structure of the grating perturbs the waveguide modes in the region underneath the grating.
0
0
0 m
2 , 0, 1, 2, ...
: Propagation constant of the m-th mode covered by the grating
~
= + =
mkn = sin11m kn >
Phase-matching condition:can be satisfied even though
-
29
Lih Y. LinEE 539B 2-
Example of Grating CouplerGrating: = 0.4 m on a GaAs planar waveguide0 = 1.15 mPropagation constant for the lowest-order mode in the waveguide: 0 = 3.6k
Assume 1st-order coupling, || = 1, what incident angle should the light make in order to couple to the lowest-order mode?At what 0 do we start to need higher-order coupling?
EE 539BIntegrated Optics and NanophotonicsLoss MechanismsScattering LossesSurface Scattering Loss (I)Surface Scattering Loss (II)Interband AbsorptionFree-Carrier AbsorptionLoss Coefficient for Free-Carrier Absorption (I)Loss Coefficient for Free-Carrier Absorption (II)Radiation Loss (I)Radiation Loss (II)Lets pack 16 stages of modulators16 x 16 Thermo-Optic SwitchMeasurement of Waveguide Losses? End-Fire Coupling to Waveguides of Different LengthsMeasurement of Waveguide Losses? Prism-Coupled Loss MeasurementGeneral Definitions for Coupling LossDirect FocusingTEM0,0 Gaussian BeamGaussian Beam Through a Thin LensEnd-Butt CouplingMisalignment EffectTapered Mode Size ConvertersPrism CouplersExample: Output Prism CouplerCoupled-Mode TheoryNotes on Prism CouplingGrating CouplerExample of Grating Coupler