downstream loading and trends in water quality in the wabash and white rivers - usgs

24
Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS United States Department of Interior Jeff Frey, USGS November 4, 2011 White River at Hazleton, Ind.

Upload: liko

Post on 23-Feb-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

United States Department of Interior. Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS. Jeff Frey, USGS November 4, 2011. White River at Hazleton, Ind. USGS Programs that Monitor the Wabash River System - Active. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the

Wabash and White Rivers - USGS

United States Department of Interior

Jeff Frey, USGS

November 4, 2011White River at Hazleton, Ind.

Page 2: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

USGS Programs that Monitor the Wabash River System - Active

–National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN)• Wabash River at New Harmony, IN

(1973-1983, 1996-present)• White River at Hazleton, IN

(1973-1983, 2007-present)

–National Water Quality-Assessment Program (NAWQA)• White River at Hazleton, IN (1991-present)

Page 3: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Location of the Active Wabash and White River sites

Sugar Creek at New Palestine, IN, 2003

Page 4: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Location for the Major

Sub-basins of the

Mississippi River

Page 5: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Smith and others, 1982, used seasonal Kendall test at NASQAN sites for Total Phosphorus

Page 6: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Sources of Nutrients

Nutrient Primer

From Nutrient Circular, Dubrovsky and others, 2010

Page 7: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Nitrogen and Phosphorus nonpoint inputs – come primarily from fertilizer in the White and Miami River Basins

Page 8: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Wabash River at New Harmony, Ind.

Total Phosphorus

http://toxics.usgs.gov/pubs/of-2007-1080/methods.html

Page 9: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Wabash River at New Harmony, Ind.

Nitrate plus Nitrite

http://toxics.usgs.gov/pubs/of-2007-1080/methods.html

Page 10: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

Wabash River at New Harmony, Ind.Ammonia Flux (metric tons as N)

Page 11: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Total Nitrogen Loads for the Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River

Ohio River

… 1980-1996 average__ 5 year moving average

Page 12: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Total Nitrogen Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River

Ohio River

… 1980-1996 average__ 5 year moving average

Page 13: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Total Phosphorus Loads for the Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River

Ohio River

… 1980-1996 average__ 5 year moving average

Page 14: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Total Phosphorus Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River

Ohio River

… 1980-1996 average__ 5 year moving average

Page 15: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Nitrate Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River

Wabash River

Ohio River

Page 16: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Ammonia Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River

Wabash River

Ohio River

Page 17: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

PO4 Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River

Wabash River

Ohio River

Page 18: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

TP Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River

Total Phosphorus

Wabash River

Ohio River

Page 19: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Atrazine Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River

Total Phosphorus

Wabash River

Ohio River

Page 20: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Super Gage White River at Hazleton, IN (03374100)

http://www.ipcamhost.net/test_player.jsp?id=18&path=usgs-in

http://waterdata.usgs.gov/in/nwis/uv/?site_no=03374100

Page 21: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Suspended Sediment vs. Turbidity

White River at Hazleton, IN

1 10 100 100010

100

1000

Turbidity, Formazin nephelometric units

Susp

ende

d se

dim

ent c

once

ntra

-tio

n, m

g/L

R2 = 0.96RSE = 0.082N = 13

Page 22: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

QA/QC leads to accurate data

White River at Hazleton, IN

8/1 8/3 8/5 8/7 8/9 8/11 8/13 8/150

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Turbidity, raw data Turbidity, corrected Gage height

Turb

idity

, For

maz

in n

ephe

lo-

met

ric u

nits

Gag

e he

ight

, fee

t

Initial Turbidity Raw 48 Corrected 48

Final Turbidity Raw 106 Corrected 76

Peak Turbidity Raw 161 Corrected 140

Page 23: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

Suspended Sediment vs. Turbidity

Eagle Creek at Zionsville, IN

1 10 100 10001

10

100

1000

Turbidity, Formazin nephelometric units

Susp

ende

d se

dim

ent c

once

ntra

-tio

n, m

g/L

R2= 0.99RSE = 1.359N=13

Page 24: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the  Wabash and White Rivers -  USGS

More information

National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN)

http://water.usgs.gov/nasqan/

National Water Quality-Assessment Program (NAWQA)

http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/