dr. montserrat torremorell - influenza: understanding the current state, future impact and what...

25
Swine influenza: Current state, future impact and what producers can do to reduce their risk Montse Torremorell, DVM, PhD Leman Chair, University of Minnesota

Upload: john-blue

Post on 26-Jul-2015

203 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Swine influenza: Current state, future impact and what producers can do to reduce

their risk

Montse Torremorell, DVM, PhDLeman Chair, University of Minnesota

Introduction

• Influenza is a common cause of respiratory disease in pigs

• Worldwide distributed

• Multiple subtypes and strains within a subtype which difficult the control

• Influenza is shared among

pigs, poultry and people

UMN VDL 2008-2013

300

200

100

0

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Others

Untypable

H3 / N?

H3 / N2

H1 / N?

H1 / N2

H1 / N1

Influenza can be costly

• Economic impact– $3.23 difference from baseline in loss per

head placed (Dykhuis Haden et al., 2012)

– $10.41 difference from baseline in loss per head placed due to SIV/PRRSV combination (Dykhuis Haden et al., 2012)

– $10.31 ($0.89 ADG, $2.73 FC, $2.94 THI, $3.75 Vet Med) (Donovan 2005)

Current state• 1. Gilts and weaned pigs can be a source of

influenza virus Sub-population N Positive Prevalence

Gilts < 1 m on-site 625 73 11.7

Gilts > 1 m on-site 1767 37 2.1

Piglets 1796 94 5.2

Total 4188 204 4.9

Sow farms

Sampling Events

Pools(pools of 3 swabs)

n=52

n=252

n=2,520

44% +

26% +

15% +

How important are weaned pigs?

Allerson et al., 2013

Sampling event Sampling event

Farm 1 2 3 4 5 6 Farm 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 H1 H1 H1 27

2 28 3 29 H1 H1

4 30 H1 H1 H1 H1 5 H3 31

6 32 H3

7 33 8 34 H1

9 H3 H3 H3 35 H3 H3 H3 H3 H3 H3 10 36 H3 H3 H3/H1 H3 H3 H3

11 H1 H1 H1 37 H1 H1 H1 H1 H1 H1

12 38 H1 H1 13 H1 H1 39

14 40 H3 H3 15 41

16 H3 H3 42 17 43

18 44 H1 H1 H1 H1

19 H1 H1 H1 45 H3 20 46

21 47 H3 H3 H3 22 48

23 49

24 50 H1 H1 25 H1 H1 51 H1 H1

26 52 H1 H1 H1

Farm ID

Count of HA gene sequences compared

Subtype Lowest % identity between all sequences

1 3 H1 99.89 3 H3 99.711 2 H1 99.813 2 H1 99.419 3 H1 99.525 2 H1 99.830 2 H1 99.935 6 H3 98.836 6 H3 98.837 6 H1 99.438 2 H1 99.940 2 H3 10044 4 H1 99.847 2 H3 99.850 2 H1 99.751 2 H1 99.952 3 H1 99.8

• HA gene sequences similar across (+) sampling events within farm

• 3 sow herds tested (+) for 6 consecutive sampling events over durations of 156, 165, and 165 days

• Different viruses across farms

Current state

• 1. Weaned pigs are a source of influenza virus

• 2. Infections in growing pigs are highly prevalent

Current state

• 2. Infections in growing pigs are highly prevalent

32 farms tested monthlyfor 2 years (Jun 2009-Dec 2011)16,170 nasal swabs 746 (4.6%) tested positive

Corzo et al., 2012

EpidemiologyGrow-finish surveillance

Corzo et al., 2012

Genetic diversity in grow-finish sitesFa

rm Id

entifi

catio

n N

umbe

r

H1N1 pH1N1 H1N2 H1N2v H3N2 H3N2v Untypable Mixed Infection

Corzo et al., 2012

Current state

• 1. Weaned pigs are a source of influenza virus

• 2. Infections in growing pigs are highly prevalent

• 3. Infections in groups of pigs can be prolonged

Detection of influenza virus in an all-in/all-out wean-to-finish facility

Oral fluid and nasal swab results

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 9 16 26 35 47 58 69 79 96

Day of study

Per

cen

tag

e p

osi

tive

Nasal swabs

Oral fluids

Weaned pigs are an important source for virus movementProlonged detection of infection in growing pig populations

Positives Re infected

99 (75%) 29 (29%)

Positives Re infected

124 (98%) 102 (82%)

Current state

• 1. Weaned pigs are a source of influenza virus

• 2. Infections in growing pigs are highly prevalent

• 3. Infections in groups of pigs can be prolonged

• 4. People can be a source of new viruses into pigs

Sick people can infect pigs

• Multiple reports on human flu strains infecting pigs– H1N1 pandemic virus– H3N2s

• People contribute to the influenza genetic diversity found in pigs

• Not all strains transmitted equally

What can producers do?

• 1. Vaccination of influenza– Improvement of clinical signs but does not

always minimize transmission– Sow vaccination

• Pre-farrowing vaccination• Whole herd mass vaccination

– Interference with maternal immunity

Suckling Piglet Monitoring

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

21-Feb 10-Mar 22-Mar 6-Apr 25-Apr 10-May 25-May

14 days 14 days 14 days 14 days 14 days 14 days 14 days

Negative Suspect Positive

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

21-Feb 10-Mar 22-Mar 6-Apr 25-Apr 10-May 25-May

21 days 21 days 21 days 21 days 21 days 21 days 21 days

Negative Suspect Positive

At 14 days of age

At 21 days of age

Sow vaccination performed on Feb11 and Mar 11-14

CT value: 37.99

1 pig

Corzo et al., 2013

What can producers do?

• 2.Take a “PRRS-like” approach: – Understand where the viruses come from:

• What’s the source of virus?• Weaned or replacement animals or people or air?

– Start at the top– Assess whether/how different practices/strategies

work:• Vaccination – how should we vaccinate populations?• Herd closure• Early weaning• Others?

What can producers do?

• 3. Implement seasonal vaccination of farm personnel

What works needs to be done?

• 1. Better vaccines and know how to vaccinate

• 2. Deeper understanding of influenza transmission and epidemiology

• 3. Assess biosecurity programs to minimize introduction of new viruses and mitigate existing ones

Conclusions

• Influenza is a very important problem in pigs

• Control of influenza can be very frustrating

• Prevention of new infections should be a priority

Questions?

[email protected]

• Seminar Title: PEDV, PRRS and Influenza: Understanding the current state, future impact and what producers can do to reduce their risk.

•  • Presenters: Dr. Lisa Becton, National Pork Board [PEDV] – Dr. Montserrat

Torremorell, U of MN [Influenza] – Dr. Dave Wright, Veterinarian [PRRS]•  • Seminar Format:  Each presenter will have up to 15 minutes to discuss the most

up-to-date information about their area of focus.  Topics of discussion should include, but are not limited to,

• 1. What is the current state of the health challenge in MN / nationally?• 2. What new developments have been made to control the health challenge?• 3. What can producers do to reduce their risk of exposure on their farms? • 4. What work still needs to be done?