dr richard a. carr, warwick hospital

29
Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital Case 206. F28. Excision of mole right breast.

Upload: meli

Post on 12-Jan-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Case 206. F28. Excision of mole right breast. Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital. Slice 1. Slice 2. Slice 3. Summary: N=53. Benign: 29 DN21 CN5 Clonal1 Uncertain Favour Benign: 5* CN & Clonal 1 Unclassified4 Uncertain Favour Malignant:4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

Case 206. F28. Excision of mole right breast.

Page 2: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

Slice 1

Page 3: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 4: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 5: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 6: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 7: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 8: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 9: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

Slice 2

Page 10: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 11: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 12: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 13: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 14: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 15: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

Slice 3

Page 16: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 17: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 18: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital
Page 19: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

Summary: N=53• Benign: 29

– DN 21

– CN 5

– Clonal 1

• Uncertain Favour Benign: 5*– CN & Clonal 1

– Unclassified 4

• Uncertain Favour Malignant: 4– Min. Dev.: 1; in situ NOS: 1; SSMM : 1; Unclassified: 1

• Malignant 18– SSMM: 10; Min. Dev. 4; Unclassified: 3: Nodular: 1

* Includes some cases marked benign and malignant!

Page 20: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

Parameters (N=18)• Clark level

I II III IV V

4 2 7 6 0

• Breslow: 0.3 to 1.1 (Mean: 0.85; Median 0.9)

• VGP: 13 RGP: 5

• Regression: Yes: 9 No: 9

• Mitoses: Absent: 13: Low: 3: High: 0

* Some parameters not assessed for melanoma in situ

Page 21: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

EQA Participants - 1• Sections not to full face in our circulation, so

cannot be assessed in entirety. However, looks strongly sugegstive on naevoid MM arising in severely dysplastic naevus. Would do the usual workup (levs +/- Ki 67, ? p16)

• I need some history! One section looks like a dysplastic junctional nevus, one looks like a sclerosed, traumatised nevus with worrying adjacent junctional areas, the other which at low power looks relatively benign, has some large atypical cells in the base ??ancient nevus features.

Page 22: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

EQA Participants• Special site naevus but with some

degree of atypia and regression. Not sure if to much atypia considering the site.

• Severely dysplastic naevus. If the patient was older would be more concerned about naevoid melanoma

• moderately dysplastic naevus excised with narrow margin, would recommend further excision.

Page 23: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

EQA Participants• Underlying benign conventional naevus in

dermis. Junctional atypia probably still random widespread, rather than diffuse. Architectural features supportive of DN. Not much variation in nest size to suggest special site naevus.

• diificult lesion - ?traumatised; there is also regression/fibrosis, most likely benign, no deep mitoses

Page 24: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

EQA Participants• Poor sections with parts missing. The

junctional component shows shouldering, architectural and cytological atypia. Melanoma in-situ I think. The dermal compnent seems to be maturing.

• Difficult - at least melanoma in-situ, incompletely excised, arising in a naevus with regression

• An example I think of so called special site naevus.

Page 25: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

EQA Participants• This is a difficult case but on balance I think

this is a benign naevus of special site type (naevus of special site) which has been traumatised

• Differential between dysplastic nevus and special site nevus. Dysplastic nevus favoured.

• difficult case- background atypical compound naevus with evidence of regrssion and possible trauma at one edge

Page 26: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

EQA Participants• Specimen traumatised and difficult to

assess. However even though naevi in the breast area allowed more atypia, the atypia and the architecture is too atypical for this to be benign.Cells look naevoid.

• Compound naevus in special site skin, so allowances to be made in terms of architecture for that. Nonetheless, I think that there is cytological atypia and would regard this as a dysplastic naevus

Page 27: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

EQA Participants• Superficial fibrosis• ulcerated??traumatised compound melanocytic

lesion showing areas of subepidermal fibrosis ??regression??previous curretage of lesion. Morte worrying lesion but on balance benignprobably dysplastcic

• I find the marked assymmetry of this lesionconcerning, but having said that I don't think the cytology or architecture of either component is bad enough to call melanoma.

Page 28: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

EQA Participants• Special site naevus, traumatised.• Elongation and fusion of rete ridges,

cytological atypia. Dermal component shows regression but appears maturing with no mitosis. Some sections are incomplete so need to ask for deeper levels.

• Special site naevus• Complex lesion m.i.s., regression, naevus

with dermal component & mild dysplasia

Page 29: Dr Richard A. Carr, Warwick Hospital

Slide Club “Experts”

• site related atypia x1

• Dysplastic naevus x1