dr2 aerodynamic pdr ii aerodynamic preliminary design review ii “the 20 hour marathon” october...
TRANSCRIPT
DR2Aerodynamic PDR IIAerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II
“The 20 Hour Marathon”
October 19, 2000
Presented By: Loren Garrison
Team DR2Chris CurtisChris PetersJeff Rodrian
Mark Blanton
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• Presentation Outline
• Updated Aircraft Geometry
• Comparison of 3-D Lift and Drag Coefficients
• 3-D Lift, Drag, and Moment Coefficients with elevator deflection effects
• Maximum Endurance Flight Conditions
• Cmarc Developments
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II
• Wing Geometry- Airfoil: S 1210
- Taper Ratio: 1.0
- Dihedral Angle: 0 (deg)
- Sweep Angle: 0 (deg)
- Aspect Ratio: 8
- Span: 7.71 (ft)
- Root Chord: 0.96 (ft)
- Tip Chord: 0.96 (ft)
- Planform Area: 14.9 (ft2)
- Wetted Area: 29.7 (ft2)
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II
• Horizontal Tail Geometry- Airfoil: NACA 0006
- Taper Ratio: 0.75
- Dihedral Angle: 0 (deg)
- Sweep Angle: 4.0 (deg)
- Aspect Ratio: 4
- Span: 2.88 (ft)
- Root Chord: 0.82 (ft)
- Tip Chord: 0.62 (ft)
- Planform Area: 2.07 (ft2)
- Wetted Area: 4.22 (ft2)
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II
• Vertical Tail Geometry- Airfoil: NACA 0006
- Taper Ratio: 0.6
- Dihedral Angle: 0 (deg)
- Sweep Angle: 5.60 (deg)
- Aspect Ratio: 2.5
- Span: 1.81 (ft)
- Root Chord: 0.91 (ft)
- Tip Chord: 0.54 (ft)
- Planform Area: 1.31 (ft2)
- Wetted Area: 2.68 (ft2)
DR2Aerodynamic PDR II
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II
• 3-D Lift Curve (Roskam Method)
19.1
4/ )(cos44.4
1
chA
LwfL
htLLL
LLoL
KKKd
d
CKC
d
d
S
SCCC
CCC
wwf
hwf
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II
• 3-D Lift Curve (Roskam Method)
)3/1(
7.1A
2
1
3107
1
)1(
11
bl
bh
K
K
ARARK
h
h
h
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II
• 3-D Lift Curve (Roskam Method)
wLzllwLo
l
lwL
CiiC
eARC
CC
))(5.0(
3.571
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II
• 3-D Lift Curve Slope (Warner Method)
wLzllwLo
l
L
LLoL
CiiC
ARn
C
C
CCC
))(5.0(
21
1
*
,where n=1+for bu=bl
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve (Warner Method)
and are determined from a curve fit to the data in Warner, Aircraft Design: Performance
9984.02979.5759.23595.62112.63
208.0226.00072.0
234
2
b
G
b
G
b
G
b
G
c
G
c
G
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II
• 3-D Drag Polar
2
2
LDoD
LDoD
CAR
nCC
eAR
CCC
(Roskam)
(Warner)
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve for the Aircraft using the Roskam and Warner Methods
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Drag Polar for the Aircraft using the Roskam and Warner Methods
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D L/D for the Aircraft using the Roskam and Warner Methods
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Endurance Parameter for the Aircraft using the Roskam and Warner Methods
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve with Elevator Deflections
eCCCC eLLLoL **
• 3-D Lift Curve Slope (Warner Method)
21
1
ARn
Cl
CL ,where n=1+
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve Slope (Warner Method)
9984.02979.5759.23595.62112.63
208.0226.00072.0
234
2
b
G
b
G
b
G
b
G
c
G
c
G
and are determined from a curve fit to the data in Warner, Aircraft Design: Performance
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve with Elevator Deflections
ew
hthLhL
LLh
S
SCC
eE
eE
eE
CC
e
e
)1(221cos
1
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Moment Coefficient with Elevator Deflections
eCCCCemmmom
**
25.0725.0
31
180
20
1
1
)(
hnp
wLoo
Lhw
hthLw
Lhw
ht
w
acwLw
np
ohLhLohww
hthLo
w
npmh
ww
hthtmwmo
lx
c
ARC
dd
CSS
C
dd
CSS
cxC
x
iCCSc
SlC
c
xC
Sc
ScCC
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Moment Coefficient with Elevator Deflections
w
cgachL
w
hth
w
acwcgwLm
npwcg
Lhww
hthmh
ww
hthtm
eeehL
mh
c
xx
d
dC
S
S
c
xxCC
xcsmx
CSc
SlC
cS
cSC
EEEC
C
eee
e
1)(
*
)1()1(
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II
• 3-D Drag Polar with Elevator Deflections
2LDoD C
AR
nCC
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Coefficient Summary
CLo = 0.5095
CL= 3.4566 rad-1
CLe = 0.3218 rad-1
Cmo = 0.5907
Cm = -0.5623 rad-1
Cme = -1.2253 rad-1
CDo = 0.0175
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve with Elevator Deflections
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Moment Coefficient with Elevator Deflections
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Drag Polar with Elevator Deflections
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D L/D with Elevator Deflections
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Maximum L/D
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Endurance Parameter
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II
• Flight Conditions for Maximum Endurance
Vloiter = 23.9 ft/s
Angle of Attack = 6.61 deg
CL = 0.91
CD = 0.0701
• Maximum L/D
L/Dmax = 15.0
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II
DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• Future Tasks
• Extract CL and CD values from the Cmarc model to compare to the theory
• Run the Cmarc stability test to determine the aerodynamic derivatives and
compare to the theory
• Evaluate the Trim ability, Stability, and Controllability considerations