drawing quality ---- final portfolioquicksclassroom.weebly.com/.../rubric_draw_final.pdf · drawing...

Q

Name ____________________________________________________________

Drawing Quality ---- FINAL portfolio

4 Excellent

Stand 1

The work demonstrates excellent understanding of drawing through advanced visual concepts, resolved

composition, and generally excellent execution.

The work exhibits well-informed decision making and intention.

The work clearly displays imaginative ideas and successful, inventive articulation of drawing issues.

The work shows successful engagement with experimentation and/or risk taking in most pieces.

Stand 3

The work as a whole is confident and evocative: it engages the viewer with visual qualities.

The technical competence of the work is consistently excellent; materials/media used effectively to express ideas.

Any apparent appropriation of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists clearly provides a

visual reference that is transformed in the service of a larger, personal vision.

Although the five works may show varying levels of accomplishment, overall the work is at an excellent level.

3 Good

Stand 1

The work demonstrates a good understanding of drawing thru basic visual concepts & thoughtful composition.

Some clear decision making and intention are evident.

The work demonstrates some imaginative ideas of the principles of design in the drawing compositions.

The work may show engagement with experimentation and/or risk taking, but with uneven success.

Stand 3

Some of the work has evocative qualities that will engage the viewer, though confidence is not obvious;

conversely, the work may display confidence but not be engaging.

The work demonstrates good technical competence & use of drawing materials/media; technical aspects and

articulation of ideas do not always work together.

With the apparent appropriation of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists, the

student’s vision is discernible; the images have been manipulated to express the student’s individual ideas

Although the five works may show uneven levels of accomplishment, overall the work is at a good level.

2 Weak

Stand 1

The work demonstrates weak understanding of drawing; few visual concepts are considered; execution awkward.

Decision making is lacking; the work appears inadequately thought out and insufficiently explored.

The work relies heavily on unimaginative and weakly ideas about use of principles of design in the compositions.

The work shows little attempt at experimentation or risk taking, or the experimentation has little success.

Stand 3

Little about the work in terms of content, style, or process that engages the viewer; the work lacks confidence.

The work demos weak technical competence, awkward use of materials/media, & min. markmaking skills.

The works appear to be direct copies of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists; even if the

works are of average rendering skill, there is little discernible student vision or individual transformation.

The five works show little evidence of accomplishment, and overall the work is at a weak level.

1 Poor

Stand 1

The work demonstrates little understanding of drawing, visual concepts, or composition; execution naïve/clumsy.

There is little or no evidence of decision making or investigation.

The work lacks imaginative/inventive ideas about the use of the principles of design in the drawing compositions.

The work shows negligible experimentation or risk taking, or the experimentation is unsuccessful.

Stand 3

The work does not engage the viewer; no confidence is evident.

The work is generally inept; use of drawing materials and media is naïve and is lacking in mark making skills

and technical competence.

The works are obviously direct copies of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists and are

poorly rendered; there is no discernible student vision or individual transformation.

Standard 1

Score Standard 3

Score S S T T

Experimentation

C

Drawing Concentration -- FINAL portfolio

4 Excellent

Stand 1

The concentration topic and the work presented are unmistakably and obviously integrated.

The investigation of the concentration topic provides shows clear informed decision-making and discovery.

The piece clearly demonstrates innovative ideas and/or risk taking.

An evocative, engaging theme is sustained through most of the work.

Stand 3

The work conveys a sense of successful transformation and growth. The work is technically excellent; materials and media are used effectively to express ideas.

Published/photographic sources clearly provide a visual reference/inspiration that is changed considerably.

Although works may show a varying range of accomplishment, overall work is at an excellent level.

3 Good

Stand 1

The concentration topic and the work presented are closely related.

Some clear decision making and discovery are evident in the concentration piece.

The piece demonstrates some originality and some innovative thinking.

A clear theme that engages the viewer with some of the work is discernible.

Stand 3

Some transformation is noticeable; Some growth is evident, but work may be repetitive. The work demonstrates good technical competence and use of materials and media; technical aspects and

articulation of ideas do not always work together.

Published or photographic sources clearly provide ONLY a visual reference or inspiration; the images have been

manipulated to express the student’s individual ideas. – NO copying

Although the works may show a varying range of accomplishment, overall the work is at a good level.

2 Weak

Stand 1

The work conveys a sense of the concentration, but integration of the topic and the work is weak, confusing.

Decision making is lacking; the work appears inadequately thought out and insufficiently explored.

The piece is unoriginal or relies mostly on copying.

A potentially engaging theme is present but is largely unsuccessful.

Stand 3

The work mostly repetitive; only few pieces show slight signs of transformation/growth. The work demonstrates marginal technical competence and awkward use of materials and media.

Published/photographic sources clearly provide visual reference or inspiration with very little changes made.

The images are difficult to see properly because they are too small, unfocused, or poorly lighted.

The work shows little evidence of accomplishment; overall the work is at a weak level.

1 Poor

Stand 1

There is very little or no evidence of a concentration topic in the work presented.

The work shows little or no evidence of decision making or investigation.

The piece comprises cliche or simplistic solutions that are poorly executed.

A theme that could engage the viewer with the work is absent.

Stand 3

Overall, the work shows negligible transformation or growth. The work shows very little technical competence; it is naïve and lacks skill.

The works are obviously direct copies of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists.

The images are impossible to see properly because they are too small, unfocused, or poorly lighted.

Overall the work lacks accomplishment and is at a poor level.

Standard 1

Score Standard 3

Score S S T T

Process & Progress

B

Drawing Breadth -- FINAL portfolio

4 Excellent

Stand 1

The work demonstrates informed investigation of a broad range of visual concepts–refer to back of sheet

The work clearly demonstrates original vision, a variety of innovative ideas and/or risk taking.

The work clearly demonstrates a broad range of intentions or approaches. The work as a whole is confident and evocative; it engages the viewer with visual qualities.

Stand 3

The work is technically excellent; materials and media are used effectively to express ideas.

Any published or photographic sources clearly provides a visual reference/inspiration & is changed considerably.

3 Good

Stand 1

The work demonstrates a good investigation of varied visual concepts - refer to back of sheet

The work demonstrates some originality, some innovative thinking, and purposeful manipulation of the

elements and principles of 2-D design.

The work shows variety of intentions/approaches, not all successfully expressed. Some of the work has discernible evocative or engaging qualities, though confidence is not strongly

apparent; conversely, the work may display confidence but not be engaging.

Stand 3

The work demonstrates good technical competence and use of materials and media; technical aspects

and articulation of ideas do not always work together. Published or photographic sources clearly provides a visual reference or inspiration; the images have been

manipulated to express the student’s individual ideas.

2 Weak

Stand 1

The work demonstrates a weak investigation of a very limited range of visual concepts - refer to back

of sheet The ideas in work are unoriginal; the work does not show inventive use of the elements/principles of 2-D design.

The work does not clearly demonstrate a variety of intentions or approaches. There is little about the work that engages the viewer; the work does not convey much confidence.

Stand 3

The work is generally awkward; it demonstrates marginal technical competence and awkward use of materials

and media.

Published or photographic sources clearly provides a visual reference or inspiration with very little change made.

The images are difficult to see properly because they are too small, fuzzy, unfocused, or “muddy”.

1 Poor

Stand 1

The work shows little or no useful investigation of visual concepts - refer to back of sheet

There is no original or imaginative ideation in the work in regard to the elements and principles of

design; the work comprises cliche or simplistic solutions.

The work does not demonstrate a variety of intentions or approaches. The work does not engage the viewer and does not convey a sense of confidence.

Stand 3

The work is generally inept; use of materials and media is naïve and lacks skill or technical competence.

The works are obviously direct copies of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists.

The images are impossible to see properly because they are too small, unfocused, or poorly lighted.

Standard 1

Score Standard 3

Score S S T T

Variety

Pieces display obvious use of:

Form – tonal values, light and shade

Illusion of depth – 3D – space, value, etc.

Line Quality

Perspective and other spatial systems

Composition – complex spaces, layout and design

Surfaces – variety of

Variety of media

Rendering of form – organic and geometric

Mark making

Other _____________________________________

Other _____________________________________

Other _____________________________________

Mis

c. R

ubri

cs: F

inal

Por

tfolio

N

ame

____

____

____

___

Dat

e

Scor

ing

Ele

men

ts

Not

Yet

A

ppro

achi

ng E

xpec

tatio

ns

Mee

ts E

xpec

tatio

ns

Adv

ance

d

Exh

ibit

Wor

ks o

f Art

Qua

lity

1. 5

pie

ces c

ropp

ed a

ccur

atel

y –

stra

ight

, no

back

grou

nd, e

tc.

2

. 5 p

iece

s lab

eled

cor

rect

ly b

ased

on

inst

ruct

ion

shee

t

3. 5

pie

ces s

aved

in c

orre

ct fo

lder

..t

here

is w

eakn

ess m

any

par

ts

such

as o

ne n

ot c

ropp

ed st

raig

ht

and

one

slig

htly

out

of f

ocus

an

d on

e no

t mat

ted

neat

ly a

nd

man

y no

t sav

ed c

orre

ctly

Th

ere

is w

eakn

ess s

ever

al p

arts

, su

ch a

s one

not

cro

pped

stra

ight

an

d on

e sl

ight

ly o

ut o

f foc

us

and

one

not m

atte

d ne

atly

B

ut th

ere

is a

wea

knes

s 1 o

r 2

such

as o

ne n

ot c

ropp

ed st

raig

ht

or o

ne sl

ight

ly o

ut o

f foc

us

Th

ere

is n

o w

eakn

ess i

n an

y,

no

chan

ges n

eede

d.

Exh

ibit

Wor

ks o

f Art

Bre

adth

1. 1

2 pi

eces

cro

pped

acc

urat

ely –

stra

ight

, no

back

grou

nd, e

tc.

2

. 12

piec

es la

bele

d co

rrec

tly b

ased

on

inst

ruct

ion

shee

t

3. 1

2 pi

eces

save

d in

cor

rect

fold

er

..t

here

is w

eakn

ess m

any

par

ts

such

as o

ne n

ot c

ropp

ed st

raig

ht

and

one

slig

htly

out

of f

ocus

an

d on

e no

t mat

ted

neat

ly a

nd

man

y no

t sav

ed c

orre

ctly

Th

ere

is w

eakn

ess s

ever

al p

arts

, su

ch a

s one

not

cro

pped

stra

ight

an

d on

e sl

ight

ly o

ut o

f foc

us

and

one

not m

atte

d ne

atly

B

ut th

ere

is a

wea

knes

s 1 o

r 2

such

as o

ne n

ot c

ropp

ed st

raig

ht

or o

ne sl

ight

ly o

ut o

f foc

us

Th

ere

is n

o w

eakn

ess i

n an

y –

no c

hang

es n

eede

d.

Exh

ibit

Wor

ks o

f Art

Con

cent

ratio

n

1. 1

2 pi

eces

cro

pped

acc

urat

ely –

stra

ight

, no

back

grou

nd, e

tc.

2

. 12

piec

es la

bele

d co

rrec

tly b

ased

on

inst

ruct

ion

shee

t

3. 1

2 pi

eces

save

d in

cor

rect

fold

er

..t

here

is w

eakn

ess m

any

par

ts

such

as o

ne n

ot c

ropp

ed st

raig

ht

and

one

slig

htly

out

of f

ocus

an

d on

e no

t mat

ted

neat

ly a

nd

man

y no

t sav

ed c

orre

ctly

Th

ere

is w

eakn

ess s

ever

al p

arts

, su

ch a

s one

not

cro

pped

stra

ight

an

d on

e sl

ight

ly o

ut o

f foc

us

and

one

not m

atte

d ne

atly

B

ut th

ere

is a

wea

knes

s 1

or 2

su

ch a

s one

not

cro

pped

stra

ight

or

one

slig

htly

out

of f

ocus

Th

ere

is n

o w

eakn

ess i

n an

y –

no c

hang

es n

eede

d.

Scor

ing

Ele

men

ts

Not

Yet

A

ppro

achi

ng E

xpec

tatio

ns

Mee

ts E

xpec

tatio

ns

Adv

ance

d

C

once

ntra

tion

Com

men

tary

O

ne q

uest

ion

not

answ

ered

Ove

r cha

ract

er c

ount

Not

subm

itted

cor

rect

ly

Save

d an

d pr

inte

d

Ver

y po

orly

writ

ten

1

. Q #

1: T

hesi

s not

cle

arly

st

ated

– n

o re

phra

se

2

. Q #

1: T

hesi

s doe

s not

seem

to

rela

te to

the

12 p

iece

s

3. Q

#2:

Wea

kly

answ

ered

qu

estio

n –

no re

phra

sing

4. Q

#2:

Ref

er to

1-2

pie

ces a

s ev

iden

ce w

ith o

r with

out

imag

e nu

mbe

rs

5

. Q #

2: U

sed

1-2

obvi

ous a

rt-re

late

d vo

cabu

lary

cor

rect

ly

6

. Q #

2: O

rder

of p

iece

s doe

s no

t rea

lly m

atch

ans

wer

or

seem

s ver

y aw

kwar

d

7

. Bot

h: c

orre

ct sp

ellin

g,

gram

mar

– fe

w c

lear

mis

take

s

1

. Q #

1: T

hesi

s cle

arly

stat

ed

reph

rasi

ng q

uest

ion

2. Q

#1:

The

sis m

atch

es a

ll 12

pi

eces

wel

l

3. Q

#2:

Cle

arly

ans

wer

ed

ques

tion –

reph

rasi

ng

4

. Q #

2: R

efer

to 3

pie

ces a

s ev

iden

ce w

ith im

age

num

bers

5. Q

#2:

Use

d 3

obvi

ous a

rt-re

late

d vo

cabu

lary

cor

rect

ly

6

. Q #

2: O

rder

of p

iece

s mat

ch

answ

er w

ell

7. B

oth:

cor

rect

spel

ling

and

gram

mar

– o

nly

1-2

mis

take

s

1

. Q #

1: T

hesi

s cle

arly

stat

ed

with

1-2

det

ail –

reph

rase

d

2. Q

#1:

The

sis m

atch

es a

ll 12

pi

eces

ver

y w

ell –

coh

esiv

e

3. Q

#2:

Cle

arly

ans

wer

ed

ques

tion –

reph

rasi

ng

4

. Q #

2: R

efer

to 4

+ pi

eces

as

evid

ence

with

imag

e nu

mbe

rs

5

. Q #

2: U

sed

4+ o

bvio

us a

rt-re

late

d vo

cabu

lary

cor

rect

ly

6

. Q #

2: O

rder

of p

iece

s mat

ch

answ

er v

ery

wel

l - d

escr

ibe

grow

th a

nd tr

ansf

orm

atio

n

7. B

oth:

cor

rect

spel

ling

and

gram

mar

– n

o ob

viou

s m

ista

kes

Drawing Image Information

Quality

#1: Describe: _________________Size: ________________, Media: ____________________





Concentration – can include 2-3 images of process prints with notes, etc.










#10: Describe: _________________Size: ________________, Media: ___________________



Media sample

1 = “graphite”

2= “graphite, colored pencil”

3 = “mixed media”

Measure

Nearest 1/2”

Height x Width Subject Matter

Breadth













Media sample

1 = “graphite”

2= “graphite, colored pencil”

3 = “mixed media”

Measure

Nearest 1/2”

Height x Width Subject Matter

drawing quality ---- final portfolioquicksclassroom.weebly.com/.../rubric_draw_final.pdf · drawing...

Documents