drilling engineering vahid salimi textbook applied drilling engineering, by :adam t. bourgoyne jr.,...

120

Upload: juliet-standard

Post on 16-Dec-2015

262 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 2: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

DRILLINGENGINEERING

Vahid Salimi

Page 3: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Textbook

Applied Drilling Engineering,

by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr.,

Martin E. Chenevert,

Keith K. Millheim

F.S. Young Jr.,.

Page 4: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

pore pressure and fracture pressuredrilling hydraulicscasing designunder balanced drillingdirectional drilling

Contents:

Page 5: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Chapter 1

pore pressure and fracture pressure

Page 6: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Hydrostatic Pressure

• Hydrostatic pressure is defined as the pressure exerted by a column of fluid.

• The pressure is a function of the average fluid density and the vertical height or depth of the fluid column.

• Mathematically, hydrostatic pressure is expressed as:

HP (psi) = 0.052 x ρf (ppg) x D (ft) where: HP = hydrostatic pressure ρf = average fluid density D = true vertical depth or height of the column

Page 7: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Hydrostatic Pressure(cont’d)

Hydrostatic pressures can easily be converted to equivalent mud weights and pressure gradients.

Hydrostatic pressure gradient is given by: HG = HP / D … (psi/ft)

Page 8: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

ExampleCalculate the hydrostatic pressure for the

following wells:• a. mud weight = 9 ppg, hole depth = 10100 ft MD (measured

depth), 9900 ft TVD (true vertical depth)• b. mud gradient = 0.468 psi / ft, hole depth = 10100 ft MD

(measured depth), 9900 ft TVD (true vertical depth)

solutiona.

HP (psi) = 0.052 x ρf (ppg) x D (ft) = 0.052 x 9 x 9900 = 4632 psi

b. Hydrostatic pressure = fluid gradient (psi / ft) x depth (ft)..........psi

= 0.468 (psi /ft) x 9900(ft) = 4633 psi

Page 9: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Mud Weight (MW) should be kept heavy enough so that hydrostatic head of mud column is higher than formation pressure at any depth. Usually 150 psi

Need to know formation pressure in order to determine MW

Pf + 150 = 0.052 MW DPf Formation Pressure, psiMW Mud Weight, ppgD True Vertical Depth, ft150 Safety, psi

Page 10: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Example

You are drilling with 7.9 ppg oil base mud. If the formation pressure is predicted 5,000 psi at 9,000 ft true vertical depth, what is the required MW in order to have 150 psi overpressure ?

5,000 + 150 = 0.052 MW 9,000

MW = 11 ppg

Page 11: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

OVERBURDEN PRESSURE

The overburden pressure is defined as the pressure exerted by the total weight of overlyingformations above the point of interest.

The total weight is the combined weight of both the formation solids (rock matrix) and formation fluids in the pore space.

The overburden pressure can therefore be expressed as the hydrostatic pressure exerted by all materials overlying the depth of interest:

σov = 0.052 x ρb x Dwhere σov = overburden pressure (psi) ρb = formation bulk density (ppg) D = true vertical depth (ft)

Page 12: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

OVERBURDEN PRESSURE(cont’d)

Overburden gradient under field conditions of varying lithological and pore fluid density is given by:

σovg= 0.433[(1 – φ)ρma +(φxρf)]where

σovg= overburden gradient, psi/ft φ= porosity expressed as a fraction ρf= formation fluid density ρma= matrix density

Page 13: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

matrix and fluid densities

Substance Density (gm/cc)Sandstone 2.65Limestone 2.71Dolomite 2.87Anhydrite 2.98Halite 2.03Gypsum 2.35Clay 2.7 - 2.8Freshwater 1.0Seawater 1.03 - 1.06Oil 0.6 - 0.7Gas 0.15

To convert densities from gm/cc to gradients in psi/ft use:Gradient (psi/ft) = 0.433 x (gm /cc)

To convert from psi/ft to ppg, use:Density (ppg) = gradient (psi/ft) / 0.052

Page 14: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Pore pressure The magnitude of pressure in the pore of formation known as the pore pressure

Pore pressure= formation pressure=formation fluid pressure=reservoir pressure

=pressure in fluid contained in the pore spaces of the rock

Page 15: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Example Determine the pore pressure of a

normally pressured formation in the Gulf of Mexico at 9,000’ depth.

Solution p = 0.465 psi/ft * 9,000 ft = 4,185 psig

Page 16: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Homework: Pore Pressure Profiles The following pore pressure information has been supplied

for the well you are about to drill.

a. Plot the following pore pressure/depth information on a P-Z diagram :

Page 17: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

b. Calculate the pore pressure gradients in the formations from surface; to 8000ft; to 8500ft; and to 9500ft. Plot the overburden gradient (1 psi/ft) on the above plot.

Determine the mud weight required to drill the hole section: down to 8000ft; down to 8500ft; and down to 9500ft.

Assume that 200 psi overbalance on the formation pore pressure is required.

Page 18: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

c. If the mudweight used to drill down to 8000ft were used to drill into the formation pressures at 8500ft what would be the over/underbalance on the formation pore pressure at this depth?

Page 19: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

d. Assuming that the correct mudweight is used for drilling at 8500ft but that the fluid level in the annulus dropped to 500 ft below drillfloor, due to inadequate hole fill up during tripping. What would be the effect on bottom hole pressure at 8500ft ?

Page 20: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

e. What type of fluid is contained in the formations below 8500ft.

Page 21: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Normal Pore Pressure Pressure of a column of water extending from the formation to the surface The magnitude of normal pore pressure varies with the concentration of

dissolved salts, type of fluid, gases present and temperature gradient.

=0.433 psi/ft for fresh water=0.465 psi/ft for seawater

Page 22: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Subnormal Formation Pressure Subnormal pore pressure is defined as any formation pressure that is

less than the corresponding fluid hydrostatic pressure at a given depth. Subnormal formation pressure can cause lost circulation of water as the

drilling fluid.

Page 23: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

ABNORMAL PORE PRESSURE

Abnormal pore pressure is defined as any pore pressure that is greater than the hydrostatic pressure of the formation water occupying the pore space. Abnormal pressure is sometimes called overpressure or geopressure. Abnormal pressure can be thought of as being made up of a normal hydrostatic component plus an extra amount of pressure. This excess pressure is the reason why surface control equipment (e.g. BOPs) are required when drilling oil and gas wells.

Page 24: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

ABNORMAL PORE PRESSURE(cont’d)

Abnormal formation pressure can cause a kick with water as the drilling fluid.

Page 25: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Abnormal Pressure Gradients

Normal Pressure Gradients West Texas: 0.433 psi/ft Gulf Coast: 0.465 psi/ft

Normal and Abnormal Pore Pressure

Pore Pressure, psig

Dep

th,

ft

10,000’

Page 26: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Pore Pressure vs. Depth

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16Pore Pressure Equivalent, lb/gal

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

{ Density of mud required to control this pore pressure }

Dep

th,

ft

Normal

Abormal

0.433 psi/ft 8.33 lb/gal0.465 psi/ft 9.0 lb/gal

Page 27: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Pore Pressure Gradient

Fracture Gradient

Page 28: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 29: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Transition zoneThe upper portion of the region of abnormal pressure is called the transition zone

Page 30: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Causes Of Abnormal Pore Pressure

Compaction EffectsDiagenetic EffectsDifferentional Density EffectsFluid Migration Effects

Page 31: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Diagenetic Effects

With increasing pressure and temperature, sediments undergo a process of chemical and physical changes collectively known as diagenesis.

Diagenesis is the alteration of sediments and their constituent minerals during post depositional compaction.

Diagenetic processes include the formation of new minerals, recrystallisation and lithification.

Diagenesis may result in volume changes and water generation which if occurring in a seabed environment may lead to both abnormal or sub-normal pore pressure.

Page 32: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Clay Diagenesis

Clay Diagenesis (Conversion of Smectite to Illite) If the water released in this process cannot escape during compaction, then the

pore fluid will support an increased portion of the overburden and will thus be abnormally pressured.

Diagenesis of Sulphate Formations Anhydrite (CaSO4) is diagenetically formed from the dehydration of gypsum

(CaSO4.2H2O). During the process large volumes of water are released and this is accompanied by

a 30-40% reduction in formation volume

Page 33: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

7. Abnormal Pressure 661. Drilling Engineering Slide 33

HIGH PRESSURE

NORMAL PRESSURE

Page 34: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 35: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 36: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Homework

Page 37: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

661. Drilling Engineering7. Abnormal Pressure Slide 37

When crossing faults it is possible to go from normal pressure to abnormally high pressure in a short interval.

Page 38: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

7. Abnormal Pressure 661. Drilling Engineering Slide 38Well “A” found only Normal Pressure ...

Page 39: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Methods of estimating pore pressureDirect measurementIt is possible only when the formation has been drilledIt is expensiveIndirect measurementThe main parameter is the variation of porosity with depth (porosity dependent parameter)If pore pressure is normal, porosity-dependent parameter (x) have an easily recognized trend because of the decreased porosity with increased depth of burial and compaction.A departure from the normal pressure trend signals a probable transition zone.Detection of the depth at which this departure occurs is critical because casing must be set in the well before excessively pressured permeable zones can be drilled safely.

Page 40: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

7. Abnormal Pressure 661. Drilling Engineering Slide 40

Prediction and Detection of Abnormal Pressure Zones

1. Before drilling

4 Shallow seismic surveys

4 Deep seismic surveys

4 Comparison with nearby wells

Page 41: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

7. Abnormal Pressure 661. Drilling Engineering Slide 41

Prediction and Detection of Abnormal Pressure Zones

2. While drilling

4 Drilling rate, gas in mud, etc. etc.

4 D - Exponent

4 DC - Exponent

4 MWD - LWD

4 Density of shale (cuttings)

Page 42: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

7. Abnormal Pressure 661. Drilling Engineering Slide 42

Prediction and Detection of Abnormal Pressure Zones

3. After drilling

4 Resistivity log

4 Conductivity log

4 Sonic log

4 Density log

Page 43: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Compaction Theory of Abnormal Pressure

During deposition, sediments are compacted by the overburden load and are subjected to greater temperatures with increasing burial depth.Porosity is reduced as water is forced out.Hydrostatic equilibrium within the compacted layers is retained as long as the expelled water is free to escape If water cannot escape, abnormal pressures occur

Page 44: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 45: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 46: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Compaction Theory In Porous formation the overburden stress is supported by rock matrix

stress and pore pressure Bulk Density = ρm (1-Ф) + ρf Ф The average porosity in sediments ,generally decreases with increasing

depth - due to the increasing overburden This results in an increasing bulk density with increasing depth, and

increasing rock strength Average Porosity Ф = ρm - ρb / ρm – ρf Plot Ф Vs. Depth on similog graph.

Page 47: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 48: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 49: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Example

Calculate the overburden stress at a depth of 7,200 ft in the Santa Barbara Channel.

Assumeφo = 0.37ρma = 2.6 gm/cckφ = 0.0001609 ft-1ρf = 1.044 gm/cc

Page 50: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Solution

Page 51: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 52: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 53: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Homeworks

Page 54: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Homeworks (cont’d)

Page 55: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Homeworks (cont’d)

Page 56: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Pore pressure prediction methods

Measure the porosity indicator (e.g.density) in normally pressured, clean shales to establish a normal trend line.

When the indicator suggests porosity values that are higher than the trend, then abnormal pressures are suspected to be present.

The magnitude of the deviation from the normal trend line is used to quantify the abnormal pressure.

Page 57: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 58: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Equivalent Matrix Stress Method

Page 59: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 60: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Example Estimate the pore pressure at 10,200’ if the equivalent depth

is 9,100’. The normal pore pressure gradient is 0.433 psi/ft. The overburden gradient is 1.0 psi/ft.

ASSUME: At 9,100’, pne = 0.433 * 9,100 = 3,940 psig At 9,100’, σobe = 1.00 * 9,100 = 9,100 psig At 10,200’, σob = 1.00*10,200 = 10,200 psig

Page 61: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Solution

Page 62: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Approach 2: Empirical correlation More accurate Need numerous data Uses (Xo-Xn) or (Xo/Xn) to predict the

magnitude of the abnormal pressure

Page 63: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Prediction of pore pressure by seismic data

Page 64: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 65: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 66: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Homework

Page 67: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 68: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 69: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 70: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 71: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 72: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 73: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Pore pressure indications while drilling

Drilling rate (ROP) gas in mudPit levelFlowline temperature

Page 74: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Rate Of Penetration(ROP) Drill bits break the rock by a combination of several processes

including: Compression (weight-on-bit), shearing (rpm) and sometimes jetting action of the drilling fluid.

The speed of drilling is described as the rate of penetration (ROP) and is measured in ft/hr.

The rate of penetration is affected by numerous parameters namely:

Weight On Bit (WOB) Revolutions Per Minute (RPM) bit type bit wear hydraulic efficiency degree of overbalance drilling fluid properties hydrostatic pressure and hole size Formation properties

Page 75: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

75

Note, that many factors can influence the drilling rate, and some of these factors are outside the control of the operator.

TABLE 2.8 -

Page 76: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

76

Effect of bit weight and hydraulics on penetration rate

Inadequate hydraulics or excessive imbedding of the bit teeth in the rock

Drilling rate increases more or less linearly with increasing bit weight.

A significant deviation from this trend may be caused by poor bottom hole cleaning

0

Page 77: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

77

Effect of Differential Pressure on Drilling Rate

Differential pressure is the difference between wellbore pressure and pore fluid pressure

Decrease can be due to:

• The chip hold down effect

• The effect of wellbore pressure on rock strength

Page 78: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

If all parameters affecting ROP are held constant whilst drilling a uniform shale sequence then ROP should decrease with depth. This is due to the natural increased compaction with depth reflecting a decrease in porosity and increased shale density and increased shale (compressive) strength.

When entering an abnormally pressured shale, the drill bit sees a shale section which is undercompacted. The increased porosity and decreased density of the undercompacted section results in the formation becoming more ‘drillable’ as there is less rock matrix to remove. Consequently ROP increases, assuming all drilling parameters were kept constant.

Page 79: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

79

Drilling underbalanced can further increase the drilling rate.

Page 80: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Drilling Rate as a Pore Pressure PredictorPenetration rate depends on a number of different parameters.

R = K(P1)a1 (P2)a2 (P3)a3… (Pn)an

Page 81: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

81

Modified d-exponent

Page 82: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

82

The D Exponent basically attempts to correct the ROP for changes in RPM, weight on bit and hole size.

The D exponent increases linearly with depth, reflecting increased rock strength with depth. For abnormally pressured shales, the D exponent deviates from the normal trend and actually decreases with depth.

Or, in its most used form:

in Diameter,Bit d

lbf ,Bit WeightW

exponentdd

rpmN

ft/hrR

10

12log

60log

b

6

bd

WN

R

d

Page 83: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

83

dc-exponentMud weight also affects R

An adjustment to d may be made:

dc = d (rn /rc)

wheredc = exponent corrected for mud density

rn = normal pore pressure gradient

rc = effective mud density in use

Page 84: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

84

d-exponent The d-exponent normalizes R for any

variations in W, db and N

Under normal compaction, R should decrease with depth. This would cause d to increase with depth.

Any deviation from the trend could be caused by abnormal pressure.

Page 85: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

85

Example• While drilling in a Gulf Coast shale,

R = 50 ft/hr

W = 20,000 lbf

N = 100 RPM

ECD = 10.1 ppg (Equivalent Circulating Density)

db = 8.5 in

• Calculate d and dc

Page 86: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

86

Solution

34.1d

554.1

079.2

5.8*10000,20*12

log

100*6050

logd

6

bdWN

R

d

61012

log

60log

c

nc dd

19.1d

1.10*052.0

465.034.1d

c

c

Page 87: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 88: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 89: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 90: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Example

Page 91: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 92: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

solution

Page 93: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 94: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 95: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 96: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 97: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Ratio Method

The ratio method is much simpler and does not require values of overburden. To calculatepore pressure, use the following formula:

Page 98: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Homework • Using the Eaton Method, calculate the pore

pressure at depth 12000 ft given:

dcn (from normal trend) = 1.5 d-unitsdco (from new trend) = 1.1 d-unitsOverburden gradient = 19 ppgNormal pore pressure in area = 9 ppg

Page 99: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Fracture Pressure

Page 100: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 101: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Fracture Gradients 1.11- 101

Prediction of Fracture Gradients

4Well Planning4Theoretical Fracture Gradient Determination

4Hubbert & Willis4Matthews & Kelly4Ben Eaton4Comparison of Results

4Experimental Frac. Grad. Determination4Leak-off Tests

Page 102: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

In-Situ Earth Stresses

Page 103: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 104: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Example

Page 105: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young
Page 106: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Fracture Gradients 1.11- 106

Fracture Gradient Determination

2. Matthews & Kelly:

where Ki = matrix stress coefficient

s = vertical matrix stress, psi

D

P

D

KF i

Page 107: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Fracture Gradients 1.11- 107

Example

A Texas Gulf Coast well has a pore pressure gradient of 0.735 psi/ft. Well depth = 11,000 ft.

Calculate the fracture gradient in units of lb/gal using Matthews & Kelly method

Summarize the results in tabular form, showing answers, in units of lb/gal and also in psi/ft.

Page 108: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Fracture Gradients 1.11- 108

2. Matthews & Kelly

In this case P and D are known, may be calculated, and is determined graphically.

(i) First, determine the pore pressure gradient.

D

K

D

PF i

iK

Example

)given(ft/psi735.0D

P

Page 109: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Fracture Gradients 1.11- 109

Example - Matthews and Kelly

(ii) Next, calculate the matrix stress.

ft ,depthD

psi ,pressure poreP

psi ,stress matrix

psi ,overburdenS

S = P + s

s = S - P = 1.00 * D - 0.735 * D = 0.265 * D = 0.265 * 11,000s = 2,915 psi

Page 110: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Example - Matthews and Kelly

(iii) Now determine the depth, , where, under normally pressured conditions, the rock matrix stress, s would be 2,915 psi.

iD

Sn = Pn + sn n = “normal”

1.00 * Di = 0.465 * Di + 2,915

Di * (1 - 0.465) = 2,915

ft449,5535.0

915,2Di

Page 111: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Fracture Gradients 1.11- 111

Example - Matthews and

Kelly

(iv) Find Ki from the plot on the right, for

For a south Texas Gulf Coast well,

Di = 5,449 ft

Ki = 0.685

Page 112: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Example - Matthews and Kelly

(v) Now calculate F:D

P

D

KF i

735.0000,11

915,2*685.0F

ft/psi9165.0

gal/lb63.17052.0

9165.0F

Page 113: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Leak off Test A test carried out to the point where the formation leaks off

Page 114: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Fracture Gradients 1.11- 114

Page 115: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Slide 115

Experimental Determination of Fracture Gradient

Example:In a leak-off test below the casing seat at 4,000 ft, leak-off was found to occur when the standpipe pressure was 1,000 psi.

MW = 9 lb/gal.

What is the fracture gradient?

Page 116: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Slide 116

Solution

Leak-off pressure = PS + DPHYD

= 1,000 + 0.052 * 9 * 4,000= 2,872 psi

Fracture gradient = 0.718 psi/ft

EMW = ?

ft

psi

000,4

872,2

D

P OFFLEAK

13.8 lb/gal

Page 117: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Homework While performing a leak off test the surface pressure at leak

off was 940 psi. The casing shoe was at a true vertical depth of 5010 ft and a mud weight of 10.2 ppg was used to conduct the test.

Calculate: the maximum allowable mud weight at this depth .

Page 118: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Homework A leakoff test was carried out just below a 13 3/8" casing shoe at 7000 ft.

TVD using 9.0 ppg mud. The results of the tests are shown below. What is the maximum allowable mud weight for the 12 1/4" hole section ?

BBLS PUMPED SURFACE PRESSURE

1 4001.5 6702 8802.5 11003 13503.5 16004 18004.5 19005 1920

(psi)

Page 119: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) When the drilling fluid is circulating through the drillstring, the

borehole pressure at the bottom of the annulus will be greater than the hydrostatic pressure of the mud.

The extra pressure is due to the frictional pressure required to pump the fluid up the annulus. This frictional pressure must be added to the pressure due to the hydrostatic pressure from the column of mud to get a true representation of the pressure acting against the formation a the bottom of the well.

An equivalent circulating density (ECD) can then be calculated from the sum of the hydrostatic and frictional pressure divided by the true vertical depth of the well.

Page 120: DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi Textbook Applied Drilling Engineering, by :Adam T. Bourgoyne Jr., Martin E. Chenevert, Keith K. Millheim F.S. Young

Homework

If the circulating pressure losses in the annulus of the above well is 300 psi when drilling at 7500ft with 9.5ppg mud, what would be the ECD of the mud at 7500ft.