driving value the nimm, the ea, the cui, case & the...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Driving Value – the NIMM, the EA, the CUI, CASE & the TR
Dr Mark Ferrar, NHS Connecting for Health
15-JAN-2008
And in the next half hour...
• NHS Infrastructure Maturity Model (the NIMM)
• Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (the EA)
• Common User Interface Programme (the CUI)
• Collaboration Architecture & Solution Enablers (CASE)
• NHSmail Technology Refresh (the TR)
The NHS Infrastructure Maturity Model(the NIMM)
We Can Only Influence Change
NHS infrastructure numbers game
We need to raise the bar...
• “Patchy” IT infrastructure maturity and performance
• 2005 “Infrastructure Themes” still valid today (some
evidence best/worst gap widening)
• NHS not getting to lowest (or even competitive) TCO
• A consistent, well-managed desktop is key to supporting
Local NPfIT programmes (NLOP)
• Overall value eroded by premature use of high value
technology
The NIMM can help...
• NHS Infrastructure Maturity Model provides guidance and helps trusts objectively benchmark for themselves their “as-is” infrastructure capabilities, then:
• Use it to build a plan for coordinated capability improvement in a systematic way
• Use it to set investment priorities and create a benefits plan to understand desired outcomes
• Use it to collaborate with NHS suppliers so they create infrastructure solutions that NHS needs (and is ready for)
Common Themes – Integrated Projects
NIMM
CUI
CASE
Manage Risk
Responsiveness
Innovation
Competency
Efficiency
ROI/Business
Value
Standards
Re-use
Agility
Consistency
Maturity Model Delivery Approach
• Iterative & collaborative approach will regularly release new and
updated features based upon feedback and requests from users
• Develop the NIMM body of knowledge first then create tools to
help users automate assessments and provide a management
scorecard
• Delivered online via PSPG (infrastructure best practice site)
• Capability Maturity Documents developed for specific
infrastructure capabilities
• Virtual group of NIMM Champions from the NHS and key suppliers
will feed into a feature wish list of maturity guidance that needs to
be developed
• ROI modeling tool being developed to help NHS Trusts create their
own business case for improving maturity
NIMM & Microsoft EA
• We only have a limited number of Enterprise CAL Licenses (eCAL)
• This will ramp up every year for the next 3 years
• Enterprise Collaboration Technology needs eCAL
• Not straightforward, check with you LAR
• We want to get the most value from these licensees
• We need to report our licensing position against eCAL
• There are 2 capabilities that we want to use to gauge readiness
• Software Asset Management
• Collaboration Technology
• We have developed Capability Maturity Documents for these that
• Describe what we mean by these capabilities
• Describe each Maturity Level including KPIs for each level
• Recommend a level to aim for
• Suggest resources to help achieve this
KPI Description Metric
Availability of electronic
records on software
purchased or no longer used
Asset Management system used
Records for >80% of software purchases
Policy for software purchase
exists and enforceable
Policy exists and enforceable for >80% of
purchases
Accountability for maintaining
records
Formal central IT accountability exists,
performance of this role measured every six
months
On-going - Technology and
process in place to track
software installed
Coverage Accuracy
Greater than 80%
of PC estate
Greater than 80%
Ad-hoc - Technology and
process to perform audit of
software licensing position
Greater than 80%
of PC estate
Greater than 80%
NIMM Example - SAM Maturity KPIs (Level 4)
Capability Description Target Maturity Current Maturity Needs Gap
Availability of electronic
records on software
purchased or no longer
used
Records for >80% of
software purchases
Records for approximately 50%
of purchases exist. Absence of an
asset management system
makes it difficult to track this
capability.
Need to deploy an asset management
system.
Need to improve record keeping by
30%
Policy for software purchase
exists and enforceable
Policy exists and
enforceable for >80% of
purchases
A policy exists but is not regularly
communicated.
Need to create communications
channels for IT policies.
Need to incorporate IT policies in HR,
and training processes.
Accountability for
maintaining records
Formal central IT
accountability exists,
performance of this role
measured every six
months
Accountability for this is informal
and shared between purchasing
and the service desk
Accountability is informal and
responsibility is unclear.
Technology in place to track
software installed
>80% Accuracy Unknown Accuracy Need technology with processes that
can measure accuracy in tracking
deployed licenses
Technology in place to track
software installed
>80% of PC estate
covered
<50% of PC estate covered Need to increase coverage by 30%
Technology to perform ad-
hoc audit of software
licensing position
>80% Accuracy Unknown Accuracy Need technology with processes that
can measure accuracy in auditing
deployed licenses
Technology to perform ad-
hoc audit of software
licensing position
>80% of PC estate
covered
<50% of PC estate covered Need to increase coverage by 30%
NIMM Example - Gap Analysis for SAM
Management “Scope” of the NIMM
Technology “Scope” of the NIMM
NIMM Summary
Level 1 Basic
Disjointed, manual
Infrastructure
Knowledge not shared
Reactive & ad-hoc
Unpredictable service
performance
User driven “who shouts
loudest”
Focus is to Avoid
Downtime
Level 2 Controlled
Coordinated, manual
Infrastructure.
Knowledge silos exist
Reactive with some planning
in place
Services manageable &
getting predictable
Problem driven
Focus is to Get Control
Level 3 Standardised
Standardized Infrastructure
Individual Level collaboration
and knowledge sharing
Reactive & becoming proactive
Stable & architected IT Infrastructure
Request driven
Focus is to Adopt
Standards & Best Practice
Level 4 Optimised
Consolidated and virtualized Infrastructure
Team level knowledge sharing &
collaboration
Proactive & accountable
Continuous service
improvement
Service driven
Focus is on Efficiency
Level 5 Innovative
IT & business stakeholders
work in partnership
Enterprise level knowledge sharing &
collaboration
Strategic asset
Drives service innovation
Value driven
Focus is to become a
Catalyst for Innovation
Gartner Model Mapping to NIMM
Basic
RationalizedVirtualized
Service-Based
Standardized Infrastructure resources
pooled
Services managed holistically
Uncoordinated infrastructure
Standard resources,
configurations
Consolidate to fewer
Policy/Value-Based
Dynamic optimization to
meet SLAs
Objective
Ability to Change
Pricing Scheme
Business Interface
Resource Utilization
Organization
IT Management
Processes
Reduce complexity
Economies of scale
Flexibility, reduce costs
Service-level delivery
React
WeeksWeeks to days
Weeks to minutes
MinutesMonths to weeks
Fixed costsReduced, fixed costs
Fixed shared costs
Variable usage costs
None, ad hoc
Business agility
Minutes to seconds
Variable business costs
Class-of-service SLAs
Class-of-service SLAs
Flexible SLAsEnd-to-end SLAs
No SLAs
Known Rationalized Shared poolsService-based pools
Unknown
Central control ConsolidatedPooled ownership
Service-oriented
None
Business SLAs
Policy-based sharing
Business-oriented
Reactive -Proactive
Life cycle management
Proactive
Mature problem mgmt
Proactive
Prediction, dynamic capacity
Service
End-to-end service management
Chaotic –Reactive
Ad hoc
Value
Policy management
Microsoft IO Model Mapping to NIMM
DynamicStandardized RationalizedBasic
Desktop, Server, and Device ManagementSoftware distribution, Patch management, Mobility, Imaging, Virtualization
Data Protection and RecoveryBackup, Restore, Storage management
Security and NetworkingPolicy, Anti-malware, Firewall, Access control, Network protection, Quarantine
IT and Security ProcessBest practice guidance on cost-effective solution design, development, operation, and support
Identity & Access ManagementDirectory services, User provisioning, Directory-based authentication
How should you use the NIMM?
• Perform a self assessment using the NIMM
• Prioritise and invest to improve lowest scoring areas
• Aim for a balanced score, rather than excellence in isolation
• Higher value MS EA technologies only available to those with CAPABILITY to exploit them
• Leverage capabilities of Core EA products that are licensed for all and don’t default to Enterprise products that aren’t –especially if your organisation isn’t ready to exploit them
The Microsoft NHS Enterprise Agreement(the EA)
EA Framework
• Remaining 6 years of the 9 year EA
• Orders placed for years 4, 5 & 6
• Software Assurance on all products
• Deploy up to 800,000 seats over 6 years (850K inc. “flex”)
• Core CAL & Enterprise CAL Suites
• Growth in “Knowledge Worker” tools
• 340,000 SQL Client Access Licences
EA offers...
Office 2007 Professional Plus Edition• Access• PowerPoint• Word• Excel• Outlook• Publisher• Communicator• Integrated Enterprise Content
Management• Integrated Electronic Forms• Information Rights & PolicyEnterprise Edition also includes• OneNote• Groove
SQL CAL
Windows Vista Business Edition• Upgraded to Windows Vista Enterprise Edition
• Four Virtual Operating Systems• Windows Bit Locker Drive Encryption• Multi Lingual User Interface
Desktop Optimisation Pack• Softgrid
Core CAL• Windows Server CAL• Office Exchange Server Standard CAL• Office SharePoint Server Standard CAL• Systems Management Server CALEnterprise CAL also includes• Office Communications Server Standard CAL• Office Communications Server Enterprise CAL• Windows Rights Management CAL• Office SharePoint Enterprise CAL• Office Exchange Enterprise CAL• Operations Manager Client OML• Forefront Security Suite (Anti Virus)
And also...
• Windows Update Services Server(s) within N3
• Access to Digital Learning Academies & Digital Literacy
Programme
• Home User Programme and EPP
• Training Vouchers & E-Learning Tools
• Desktop Deployment Planning Services
New Stuff...
• SharePoint CAL for all desktops
• Groove growth at 50,000 per year
• Anti-Virus (Forefront)
- 223,000 in Year 4 allowing existing AV deals to “unwind”
• Vista Enterprise
- Only pay for Vista Business
• SoftGrid
- Application virtualisation fixes “Java Hell”
New LAR deal
Enrolment
AreasLAR
Number of
DesktopsAllocation
NWWM Bytes 160,900 25%
South Bytes 138,350 21%
London Bytes 111,200 17%
NE & DH Trustmarque 116,150 18%
EM & ALBs Computacenter 123,400 19%
TOTAL 650,000 100%
Value
• Most Favoured Customer.
• Lower cost per desktop than initial 3 years
• Improved collaboration and security.
• 50% increase in CUI funding
• Contributes to OGC discounting
The Common User Interface Programme(the CUI)
CUI Phase 2
• 3rd October 2007 - Development Agreement signed for 4 Projects delivery in Phase 2:
(“Classic”)
• Clinical Applications and Patient Safety (CAPS)
• Information Management and Technology (IM&T) Tools
• Knowledge Worker Tools (KWT)
(“New”)
• NHSmail Technology Refresh (TR)
CUI Phase 2 - Management
• 3 discrete governance controls across the Classic and New projects.
• Phase 2 of CUI “Classic” Projects governance changes:
• Prof Michael Thick (CFH CCO) joining the programme at Steering Board level
• Formal cross Projects Board, including:
- National Clinical Leads
- SHA CIOs
- ISB
- Service Implementation
CUI Phase 2 - Controls
• Distribution of the Products brought in-house to NHS CFH (via existing cui.nhs.uk and PSPG)
• Development of CUI integrated communications plan across the Tech Office
• Utility of new and emerging engagement channels
• Tie in with CFH initiatives
• NIMM framework and taxonomy
• Collaboration Architecture & Solution Enablers (CASE)
• Smarter internal use of EA technologies (e.g. SharePoint) to manage stakeholders
CAPS - Delivery
• Design guidance has begun to influence NHS systems development
• Extensive guidance published to the Clinical and Supplier community
• 12 Requirement DSCNs approved and issued by the ISB
• CUI documents undergoing incorporation into the NHS CFH Technical Baseline where possible
• 6 UK suppliers actively adopting CUI guidance
• UK and Worldwide interest in using CUI guidance in requirements and contracts
KWT - Delivery
• Guidance, research and products covering:
• Enablers to support NHS Entities migration through fundamentals of attaining NIMM levels 1-3
• Abbreviation Manager
• NHS Office Client Installer
• User Task Analysis
• Office Version Migration Guides
• Document Collaboration and Compliance
• Medical Research Services
IM&T Tools - Delivery
• Documents, tools and templates have been created and made easily accessible to NHS Trusts via the interactive Planning and Deployment Guide (see slide 21)
• 36 NHS Entities using guidance as Early Adopters
• 72 people from 51 NHS Trusts attending 14 dedicated Special Interest Group meetings shaped the guidance
• 19,080 NHS PCs are already live and benefiting from NHS CUI D&I guidance and when remaining pilots Live, at least 75,000 PCs benefiting from the NHS CUI D&I guidance
• 9 of the 10 Infrastructure Optimisation assessed trusts moved from Basic to Standardised maturity level following Systems Management Server pilots
The Collaboration Architecture & Solution Enablers(the CASE)
In CASE you were wondering...
The NHSmail Technology Refresh Project(the TR)
Back to the future...
• NHSmail “as is” (i.e. based on Mirapoint) is an adequate, robust, scalable, low-cost email platform, but...
... it’s growth and development pipeline was starting to look limited in features and stretched-out in time
• Best solution? – Move back to Microsoft Exchange.
• Exchange 2007 can & does scale to accommodate the NHS
• Close collaboration on design & implementation by Cable & Wireless, Microsoft and NHS CFH
Service outline
• Microsoft Exchange 2007 “back end” – fully featured
• Both Thin and Smart Clients supported• Outlook Web Access (browser-based, best experience using IE7)
• Outlook 2003 & Outlook 2007 for off-line working
• ActiveSync for Windows Mobile & Symbian smart phone clients
• Active Directory for 1million+ accounts
• Full Calendaring across nhs.net
• Same service levels and service features as current service
• Also looking at IM, VOIP integration & archive options – make NHSmail the centre of NHS Unified Communications strategy
Project outline
• High Level Design work nearing completion
• Tested architecture, build and scaling at MS EEC in December
• Detailed design underway
• More testing planned for absolute scalability assurance
• Migration planning in progress
• Discussing compression/parallelisation of some design activities to allow earlier migrations
• Current view is migration starts in Calendar-Q3/2008
• Cut-over of existing accounts followed by “new” migrations