drug-free schools and communities act kent state university · 2016-09-08 · drug-free schools and...
TRANSCRIPT
Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act 2014 Biennial Review Kent State University
In compliance with the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act (“DFSCA”, 20 U.S.C. §1011i), the following review of Kent State University’s alcohol and other drug programs assesses the academic years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014. Introduction Kent State University’s student body consists of more than 35,000 undergraduates and 6,000 graduates enrolled from all 50 states and 100 different countries. Additionally, Kent State employs more than 6,800 faculty and staff. Since the DFSCA’ s 1994 amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965, institutions of higher education have been responsible for communicating standards and prevention efforts regarding the unlawful possession, use, or distribution of alcohol and other illicit drugs (AOD) on their campuses. Every year, institutions are responsible for notifying students, faculty, and staff of the consequences AOD brings to the campus community. Every other year, in a biennial review, institutions must prepare a report that assesses AOD prevention efforts and allows for growth by examining the strengths and weaknesses of current offerings. Institutions are charged with determining the effectiveness of their efforts and ensuring that disciplinary standards for enforcement are being upheld. This biennial review has been completed by Healthy Kent. Healthy Kent, Kent State University’s Alcohol and Other Drug Task Force, is a group that fosters campus and community collaboration aimed at reducing the negative impact of alcohol and other drug use in our community. This group makes recommendations for policy and program changes, serves as the lead campus group to collaborate with community resources to reduce alcohol and other drug-related problems, coordinates the institutional alcohol and other drugs biennial review, and supports efforts of the community to reduce high risk alcohol and other drugs related negative behavior on and off campus. Description of the AOD Program Elements Program Inventory AOD programs and events are offered to students and employees on the Kent Campus by Residence Services, Office of Student Conduct, Police Services, University Health Services, Center for Student Involvement and the Division of Human Resources. For the academic years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014, 180 AOD programs and events were offered and attended by 7,965 students and employees. A complete program and event inventory is available in the Appendix of this report. Some programs and events were held online, such as the eCHECKUP TO GO program through Residence Services, however, the majority of programs and events were held in-person, including safety and awareness presentations by Kent State Police Services and AOD workshops by the Office of Health Promotion. Additionally, programs focusing on individual health and enrichment were offered. These programs did not
specifically focus on AOD issues, but addressed the overarching concept of healthy lifestyles. Examples such as Recreational Services and the Sexual and Relationship Violence Support Services Office deserve recognition as positive contributors to healthy endeavors within the University community but will not be evaluated or elaborated on in this report. In addition, the Office of Student Conduct is delegated the responsibility of enforcing the Code of Student Conduct. The Code of Student Conduct outlines the University’s expectations for student behavior; the Office of Student Conduct facilitates the review of student behavior that may be in violation of the expectations outlined in the Code of Student Conduct. In conjunction, Residence Services addresses violations for possession and use of alcohol and controlled substances. Details of the cases reviewed by both offices are outlined later in this report and additional data is included in the appendices. Annually, the faculty representative to Healthy Kent, an assistant professor in the College of Public Health, sends and collects a survey to students seeking specific alcohol and drug usage information. A grant from Portage County supports this research. Results are included at the end of this report (see Appendix). The Campus Safety, Security, and Fire Safety Bulletin is released annually for each of the eight campuses of Kent State University along with the College of Podiatric Medicine. Reports for each campus include AOD related crime statistics, programming information, and campus and local resources. The Office of Health Promotion on the Kent Campus is available as a resource to all other campuses for programming as well. Policy and Procedure Inventory A number of administrative functions are intended to have an impact on AOD prevention and awareness efforts. The University utilizes a “Good Samaritan” provision to address students who have experienced an AOD overdose and require a mental health follow-up. Parental notification letters are sent by the Office of Student Conduct and Residence Services after underage students are found responsible for alcohol or controlled substances violations. A coordinated effort between Kent State University and the City of Kent has addressed high risk AOD behaviors by reducing off campus party and noise disturbance concerns. In 2014, the Women’s Center negotiated to pilot an online educational program, “Think Luv”, with students. Think Luv is a web-based program focused on awareness and reduction of sexual misconduct that includes an educational component describing how AOD involvement frequently factors into situations involving sexual misconduct. Statement of AOD Program Goals and Goal Achievement Kent State University’s program goals for this biennial review during the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 academic years were to: 1. Increase AOD awareness through prevention programming to students and employees. 2. Eliminate College Fest, an annual high risk block party, in the City of Kent. 3. Provide AOD support services for students and employees.
4. Create an AOD addiction counselor position in Psychological Services, a unit of University Health
Services. 5. Hold students accountable for AOD violations by enforcing the Code of Student Conduct. The outcomes of these goals during this biennial review period are: 1. Increase AOD awareness through prevention programming to students and employees. Awareness regarding AOD rules and regulations begins for students at Destination Kent State, Kent
State University’s new student orientation program. This program takes place prior to the start of each semester, and in it students are informed of the University’s AOD policies. First Year Experience courses have a session targeting AOD awareness involving presenters from University Health Services and community partnerships. University Health Services provides preventative and on-going AOD services for students. AOD and depression screening are examples of programs that University Health Services supplies to aid in awareness and prevention.
Student organizations have assisted in the University’s efforts to address AOD awareness and provide additional programming and resources to our students. The message provided for students would not be effective without the willingness of students to challenge their peers’ perceptions and behaviors related to AOD. The Greek community at Kent State University provides specific training to their members in the form of GreekLifeEdu, an online program provided to new members in each organization to measure their assumptions and behaviors in regards to alcohol. This program is provided by EverFi, Inc. and provides valuable information regarding trends among our student population that guides additional program development for the community. Additionally, the Greek councils sponsor two risk awareness weeks each year that incorporate programming related to AOD topics that are open to the campus community.
Employees are informed about the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) through new employee
orientation materials. The EAP provides assistance with and access to resources for AOD concerns. 2. Eliminate “College Fest,” an annual high risk block party, in the City of Kent. College Fest has been a day-long block party attended by thousands of people. Underage drinking,
reckless behavior, and acts of violence such as fighting and rioting characterized this event. Kent State University joined with student leaders, law enforcement agencies, community members, city employees, and local businesses to collaborate and eliminate this event. The result was that no “college fest” activity materialized in 2013 and 2014.
3. Provide AOD support services for students and employees. Kent State University utilizes licensed psychologists and counseling graduate students to supply AOD
services for students, faculty, and staff. Psychological Services, a unit of University Health Services, is the primary service provider for students. The Counseling and Human Development Center (White Hall) and Psychological Clinic (Kent Hall) are also available to students, faculty, and staff. Portage County resources such as Townhall II, a community treatment agency, are promoted and accessible for students, faculty and staff. The University’s employee assistance program, Impact, provides assistance with and access to resources regarding AOD concerns for employees.
4. Create an AOD addiction counselor position in Psychological Services. In 2013, University Health Services hired a Chemical Dependency Counselor. This counselor
immediately began accepting clients who made contact on their own and clients who were referred due to outcomes from AOD incidents or campus adjudication from Residence Services or the Office of Student Conduct.
5. Hold students accountable for AOD violations by enforcing the Code of Student Conduct.
Kent State University Police Services, Residence Services, Office of Student Conduct, and Human Resources are the primary departments that coordinate a review of reported behavior when an alleged policy violation involving AOD occurs. Where students are accused of violations, there is a collaborative effort between Police Services, Residence Services, and the Office of Student Conduct to address adjudication both on campus and in the surrounding community. When an accused student is found responsible for violating University policy, the severity of the actions leads to sanctions focused on educational opportunities while being cognizant of individual safety and the campus community. Where employees are accused of violations, the supervisor is encouraged to review the reported behavior with Human Resources for appropriate action. In the academic year 2012-2013 the Office of Student Conduct adjudicated 318 AOD cases. In the academic year 2013-2014 the Office of Student Conduct adjudicated 297 AOD cases. The most frequent educational sanctions for these cases were compliance with court-ordered diversion programs and AOD workshops offered through University Health Services. In academic year 2012-2013, Residence Services addressed 682 AOD cases. In the academic year 2013-2014, Residence Services addresses 641 AOD cases. For all first-time alcohol violations in the residence halls where police do not cite students, Residence Services assigns eCHECKUP To Go online educational programs. In the fall 2013 semester, Residence Services began assigning an eCHECKUP To Go marijuana online educational program for first-time odor of marijuana violations. Greek membership uses a self-governance component where chapters use their internal judicial boards to hold members accountable for violations of organizational policy related to AOD. Sanctions within the organizations can range from written warning to membership termination.
Summaries of AOD Program Strengths and Weaknesses Strengths Multiple departments and various offices (Residence Services, Office of Student Conduct, Police Services, University Health Services, Center for Student Involvement and Division of Human Resources) offer AOD programs, events, and resources. These programs, events and resources are conducive to individuals who may be at different developmental maturities. University personnel and peer
facilitators coordinating programs and events, and providing resources, are trained to address AOD concerns. Kent State University and the City of Kent, Ohio have significantly increased collaborations during the review period. Campus and city officials meet monthly to discuss issues impacting the community typically as a result of AOD behavior. Communicating with city officials, police, and notifying landlords about problem properties has been effective. University staff and Portage County Mental Health and Recovery Board are connected and promote appropriate referrals to increase awareness of AOD issues. Both municipal and campus leaders are members of Healthy Kent: Alcohol and Other Drug Task Force. The charge of this group is to share information about AOD initiatives, communicate resources, and mobilize to address specific AOD concerns. Weaknesses A central theme for how Kent State University addresses AOD prevention, education, awareness, and response is not articulated through any one administrator or committee. This has led to inconsistency in assessment, benchmarking, and dissemination of available information and resources. This biennial review reveals inefficiency that needs to be addressed in the future to best serve the campus and community. No regional campus or College of Podiatric Medicine representatives serve on Healthy Kent; representatives should be added for the next biennium. Procedures for Distribution of Annual AOD Notification to Students and Employees Through the Office of the Vice President of Enrollment Management and Student Affairs, the Associate Vice President for Student Affairs and Dean of Students (“Dean of Students”) is responsible for coordinating and distributing the annual AOD notification to students, faculty, and staff. For the most recent distribution (2014) the Dean of Students consulted with the Office of Health Promotion, University Health Services, Office of Student Conduct, Police Services, and Office of General Counsel to verify the information and resources. An email was sent to the entire Kent State University community. In addition to the email, a website on the Vice President for Enrollment Management and Student Affairs page was created to display further resources and details for all University personnel and community members to view. The 2013 and 2014 annual notification is available in the appendix of this document. Recommendations for Revising AOD Programs The following recommendations are made from the co-chairs of Healthy Kent for revising AOD programs, events, and resources. In the future, the Healthy Kent group will make these recommendations together:
Continue to build on the strengths of providing high quality and a large quantity of programs from educated and diverse presenters
Use Healthy Kent: Alcohol and Other Drug Task Force as the group responsible for supplying the University’s single voice for direction and goals regarding AOD programs
Develop a feasible and consistent assessment strategy for AOD programs, events, and resources
Integrate regional campuses into programing, events, and resources
Review and update AOD policies as appropriate
Recruit student representation on Healthy Kent
Evaluate the annual AOD survey for content, data analysis, and practical implications Appendix – Copies of Policies Distributed to Students and Employees Appendix 1: Program and events spreadsheet Appendix 2: Annual notification email (2013, 2014) Appendix 3: Code of Student Conduct update email (2013, 2014) Appendix 4: Office of Student Conduct data (2013, 2014) Appendix 5: Residence Services data (2013, 2014) Appendix 6: Chemical Dependency Counselor Service Summary (2014) Appendix 7: Academic Survey results (2013, 2014) Through the Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse and Violence Prevention, the U.S. Department of Education funded Complying with the Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations [EDGAR Part 86]: A Guide for University and College Administrators, Washington D.C., 2006, revised by Beth DeRicco, Ph.D., CPP-R (“Guide”). According to the Guide, “this publication is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted.” Kent State University acknowledges that intellectual information and direction from the Guide have been utilized in the creation of this biennial review.
Dat
eD
ep
t.Ti
tle
Pro
gram
Go
alA
tte
nd
ed
Ass
ess
me
nt
No
tes
6/4
/12
OH
PD
rug
Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
1R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
6/4
/12
OH
PO
HP
Tab
le a
t D
KS
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s3
5P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/5
/12
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
8R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
6/5
/12
OH
PO
HP
Tab
le a
t D
KS
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s3
0P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/6
/12
OH
PO
HP
Tab
le a
t D
KS
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s5
0P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/7
/12
OH
PO
HP
Tab
le a
t D
KS
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s2
5P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/1
8/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s2
0P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/1
9/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s2
3P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/2
0/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s2
7P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/2
1/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s1
9P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/2
5/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s3
0P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/2
6/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s2
7P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/2
7/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s3
6P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/2
8/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s3
1P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
7/1
0/1
2O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
2R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
7/1
1/1
2O
HP
Dru
g A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
1R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
Appendix 1: Program and Events spreadsheet (AY 2012-13 & 2013-14)
8/1
6/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
RA
Res
ou
rce
Fair
Focu
s o
n r
eso
urc
e b
uild
ing
in h
ealt
h e
du
cati
on
12
0P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
8/2
6/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
CSI
Bac
k to
Sch
oo
l Bla
sto
ff
Ad
dre
ss c
on
cep
t o
f im
pai
rmen
t an
d d
ange
rs o
f
dri
nki
ng
and
dri
vin
g2
65
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
8/2
9/1
2K
SUP
DC
amp
us
Safe
ty
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
80
Res
. Hal
l Lea
rnin
g C
om
mu
nit
y
9/5
/12
KSU
PD
Un
der
age
Dri
nki
ng
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s 3
5R
es. H
all
9/6
/12
KSU
PD
Cam
pu
s Sa
fety
Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 4
5FY
E cl
assr
oo
m v
isit
9/7
/12
OH
PO
HP
Tab
le a
t B
lack
Squ
irre
l Fes
tiva
l
Cre
ate
grea
ter
awar
enes
s o
f A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s.1
50
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
9/1
1/1
2K
SUP
DC
amp
us
Safe
ty
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
45
FYE
clas
sro
om
vis
it
9/1
1/1
2K
SUP
DG
ener
al S
afet
ySa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 2
0O
ff c
amp
us
stu
den
t h
ou
sin
g
9/1
2/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
s at
Qu
adFe
stC
reat
e gr
eate
r aw
aren
ess
of
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s.3
25
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
9/1
3/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
Vo
lun
teer
Fair
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s2
8P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
9/1
3/1
2O
HP
Alc
oh
ol a
nd
Sex
ual
Hea
lth
Ad
dre
ss is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s re
late
d t
o h
igh
ris
k
beh
avio
r1
25
Cam
pu
s/C
om
mu
nit
y
Pre
sen
tati
on
9/1
5/1
2O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
LNC
/SA
LSA
Fest
ival
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s2
5P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
9/1
9/1
2O
HP
Alc
oh
ol a
nd
Sex
ual
Hea
lth
Ad
dre
ss is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s re
late
d t
o h
igh
ris
k
beh
avio
r1
6C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
9/2
3/1
2K
SUP
DSa
fety
: Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
sSa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 3
0Fr
ater
nit
y
9/2
4/1
2O
HP
Bin
ge D
rin
kin
g (F
YE)
Ad
dre
ss is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s re
late
d t
o h
igh
ris
k
dri
nki
ng
20
Cam
pu
s/C
om
mu
nit
y
Pre
sen
tati
on
10
/2/1
2K
SUP
DA
lco
ho
l & S
ub
stan
ce
Ab
use
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
mu
ltip
le
Tab
le w
/ st
ud
ent
org
. ,
Go
ggle
s, e
tc
10
/2/1
2C
SI1
8 t
o 2
5 T
ablin
gTo
pro
vid
e aw
aren
ess
to s
tud
ents
ab
ou
t
dri
nki
ng
beh
avio
r an
d r
isks
63
Stu
den
ts w
ere
aske
d t
o
take
a s
ho
rt q
uiz
ab
ou
t
thei
r al
coh
ol
con
sum
pti
on
an
d t
hen
rece
ived
fre
e p
rize
s
fro
m 1
8 t
o 2
5
This
eve
nt
was
wel
l att
end
ed
for
a ta
ble
, ho
wev
er t
he
stu
den
ts d
id n
ot
take
mu
ch
tim
e fi
llin
g o
ut
the
surv
eys.
10
/6/1
2O
HP
Pee
r Su
pp
ort
: Dis
tres
s
and
Dif
ficu
lt Is
sues
(A
ctiv
e
Min
ds
Spea
kers
)
Incr
ease
aw
aren
ess
of
sub
stan
ce u
se a
nd
ab
use
as it
rel
ates
to
men
tal h
ealt
h2
89
Cam
pu
s/C
om
mu
nit
y
Pre
sen
tati
on
10
/8/1
2O
HP
Dru
g A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
2R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
10
/8/1
2O
HP
Alc
oh
ol I
ssu
esA
dd
ress
issu
es a
nd
co
nce
rns
rela
ted
to
hig
h r
isk
beh
avio
r3
5C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
10
/10
/12
OH
P
OH
P T
able
at
Car
eers
in
Hig
her
Ed
uca
tio
n
Cel
ebra
tio
n
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s9
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
10
/11
/12
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
8R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
10
/15
/12
OH
PO
HP
Tab
le a
t O
pen
Enro
llmen
t R
eso
urc
e Fa
ir
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s2
20
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
10
/17
/12
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Gra
nt:
BU
ZZK
ILL
Cam
pai
gn
Rai
se a
war
enes
s o
f is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s ar
ou
nd
soci
al h
ost
ing
43
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
10
/17
/12
CSI
Arr
ive
Aliv
e P
rogr
amM
ake
stu
den
ts a
war
e o
f th
e ri
sks
asso
ciat
ed
wit
h D
UI/
DW
I1
50
Stu
den
ts p
arti
cip
ated
in a
dru
nke
n d
rivi
ng
sim
ula
tor
and
rec
eive
d
an a
sses
smen
t
afte
rwar
ds
abo
ut
thei
r
ind
ivid
ual
per
form
ance
.
This
pro
gram
was
ver
y p
op
ula
r,
bu
t th
e si
mu
lato
r w
as
exp
ensi
ve a
nd
on
ly 3
0 s
tud
ents
cou
ld u
se it
per
ho
ur.
10
/18
/12
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
50
Soro
rity
10
/19
/12
OH
PM
ariju
ana
(FYE
)A
dd
ress
issu
es a
nd
co
nce
rns
rela
ted
to
sub
stan
ce u
se1
4C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
10
/21
/12
KSU
PD
Mak
ing
Go
od
Dec
isio
ns:
Hal
low
een
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
25
Frat
ern
ity
10
/22
/12
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
30
Res
. Hal
l
10
/22
/12
OH
PB
inge
Dri
nki
ng
(FYE
)A
dd
ress
issu
es a
nd
co
nce
rns
rela
ted
to
hig
h r
isk
dri
nki
ng
17
Cam
pu
s/C
om
mu
nit
y
Pre
sen
tati
on
10
/23
/12
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
30
Res
. Hal
l 1
0/2
3/1
2K
SUP
DH
allo
wee
n S
afet
y Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 3
0R
es. H
all
10
/23
/12
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
30
Res
. Hal
l
10
/24
/12
KSU
PD
Gen
eral
Saf
ety:
Hal
low
een
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
32
FYE
clas
sro
om
vis
it
10
/24
/12
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
30
Res
. Hal
l 1
0/2
4/1
2K
SUP
DH
allo
wee
n S
afet
y Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 5
5R
es. H
all
10
/24
/12
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Gra
nt:
BU
ZZK
ILL
Cam
pai
gn
Rai
se a
war
enes
s o
f is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s ar
ou
nd
soci
al h
ost
ing
47
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
10
/24
/12
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Ris
k M
anag
emen
t
(Fra
tern
ity)
Ad
dre
ss is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s re
late
d t
o h
igh
ris
k
dri
nki
ng
23
Cam
pu
s/C
om
mu
nit
y
Pre
sen
tati
on
10
/25
/12
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
40
FYE
clas
sro
om
vis
it1
0/2
5/1
2K
SUP
DH
allo
wee
n S
afet
y Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 1
6FY
E cl
assr
oo
m v
isit
10
/25
/12
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
40
Res
. Hal
l
10
/25
/12
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Ris
k M
anag
emen
tA
dd
ress
issu
es a
nd
co
nce
rns
rela
ted
to
hig
h r
isk
beh
avio
r5
1C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
10
/26
/12
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
35
FYE
clas
sro
om
vis
it
10
/31
/12
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Gra
nt:
BU
ZZK
ILL
Cam
pai
gn
Rai
se a
war
enes
s o
f is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s ar
ou
nd
soci
al h
ost
ing
31
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
11
/6/1
2O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
2R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
11
/11
/12
OH
PA
OD
Issu
es (
Frat
ern
ity)
Ad
dre
ss is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s re
late
d t
o
sub
stan
ce u
se2
5C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
11
/14
/12
OH
PD
rug
Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
3R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
11
/14
/12
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
14
Ref
lect
ion
Pap
er
11
/28
/12
KSU
PD
Dru
g U
se &
Mis
use
DO
A P
reve
nti
on
Met
ho
ds
info
40
Cla
ssro
om
vis
it
12
/1/1
2O
HP
Dru
g A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
11
Ref
lect
ion
Pap
er
12
/8/1
2O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
14
Ref
lect
ion
Pap
er
1/1
6/1
3O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
Sup
po
rt a
nd
Men
tori
ng
Fair
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s1
5P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
1/2
4/1
3O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
11
Ref
lect
ion
Pap
er
1/2
8/1
3O
HP
Dru
g A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
3R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
2/1
9/1
3O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
3R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
2/2
1/1
3O
HP
Dru
g A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
3R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
2/2
4/1
3K
SUP
DR
isk
Man
agem
ent
Co
nce
rns
Aw
aren
ess
25
Frat
ern
ity
2/2
7/1
3O
HP
Alc
oh
ol a
nd
Sex
ual
Hea
lth
Ad
dre
ss is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s re
late
d t
o h
igh
ris
k
beh
avio
r1
3C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
2/2
8/1
3O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
1R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
2/2
8/1
3O
HP
Alc
oh
ol I
ssu
es &
Co
nce
rns
(Fam
ily P
olic
y C
lass
)
Ad
dre
ss is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s re
late
d t
o h
igh
ris
k
dri
nki
ng
25
Cam
pu
s/C
om
mu
nit
y
Pre
sen
tati
on
3/1
1/1
3K
SUP
DA
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s 2
0R
es. H
all
3/1
1/1
3K
SUP
DR
isk
Man
agem
ent
Co
nce
rns
Aw
aren
ess
30
Frat
ern
ity
3/1
2/1
3K
SUP
DSt
. Pat
ty D
ay: A
lco
ho
l
Aw
aren
ess
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s 1
5R
es. H
all
3/1
8/1
3O
HP
Dru
g A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
1R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
3/1
8/1
3R
STh
e N
ews
Ab
ou
t B
oo
ze
3/1
8/1
3R
SW
hat
Are
Yo
u D
rin
kin
g?
3/1
9/1
3O
HP
Safe
Sp
rin
g B
reak
Kic
k-O
ff
Day
Fost
er d
ialo
gue
on
hea
lth
y d
ecis
ion
mak
ing
and
risk
red
uct
ion
issu
es7
8P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
3/2
0/1
3K
SUP
DSp
rin
g B
reak
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
25
Res
. Hal
l
3/2
0/1
3O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
4R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
3/2
0/1
3O
HP
Nat
ion
al A
lco
ho
l
Scre
enin
g D
ay O
verv
iew
(Ad
dic
tio
ns
Co
un
selin
g
Cla
ss)
Hig
hlig
ht
scre
enin
g d
ay e
ven
t an
d s
cori
ng
inst
ruct
ion
s o
f A
UD
IT1
4C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
4/1
/13
RS
Oh
Wh
at A
Nig
ht
4/2
/13
OH
PO
HP
Tab
le a
t P
ub
lic
Hea
lth
Fai
r
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s1
30
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
4/4
/13
OH
PN
atio
nal
Alc
oh
ol
Scre
enin
g D
ayR
edu
ce a
nd
pre
ven
t at
-ris
k d
rin
kin
g.3
08
AU
DIT
Scr
een
ing
Too
l
4/8
/13
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
2R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
4/8
/13
RS
Sob
er o
r Sl
op
py
4/1
4/1
3K
SUP
DG
ener
al S
afet
y Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 1
0R
es. H
all
4/1
7/1
3O
HP
Dru
g A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
3R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
5/1
/13
RS
Hig
hlig
hte
r/R
ave
Par
ty
5/4
/13
OH
PD
rug
Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
2R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
5/1
1/1
3O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
13
Ref
lect
ion
Pap
er
6/1
/13
RS
Ech
ecku
p t
o g
o p
rogr
am
(alc
oh
ol)
On
line
edu
cati
on
al s
anct
ion
38
7O
bta
ined
fro
m R
esid
ence
Serv
ices
dis
cip
linar
y st
atis
tics
6/4
/13
OH
PO
HP
Tab
le a
t D
KS
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s2
6P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/5
/13
OH
PO
HP
Tab
le a
t D
KS
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s3
3P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/7
/13
OH
PO
HP
Tab
le a
t D
KS
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s1
8P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/1
0/1
3O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s2
4P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/1
1/1
3O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s3
2P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/1
2/1
3O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s4
0P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/1
3/1
3O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
DK
SIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s3
7P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
6/1
7/1
3O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
3R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
6/1
8/1
3O
HP
Dru
g A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
1R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
8/6
/13
KSU
PD
Pro
fess
ion
al S
taff
Tra
inin
g In
clu
de
curr
ent
dru
g tr
end
s in
fo
22
Res
iden
ce S
ervi
ces
Pro
fess
ion
al
Staf
f
8/6
/13
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
1R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
8/1
4/1
3K
SUP
DIm
pai
red
Dri
ver
Aw
aren
ess
Pre
scri
pti
on
dru
g u
se &
dri
vin
gm
ult
iple
C
olla
bo
rati
on
w/
Co
mm
. Org
.'s
& K
PD
8/1
5/1
3O
HP
RA
pre
sen
tati
on
Ho
w t
o a
ssis
t st
ud
ents
in d
istr
ess;
ch
emic
al
dep
end
ency
co
un
selo
r o
pti
on
intr
od
uce
d1
45
8/1
5/1
3O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
RA
Res
ou
rce
Fair
Focu
s o
n r
eso
urc
e b
uild
ing
in h
ealt
h e
du
cati
on
14
0P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
8/2
1/1
3O
HP
ALA
NA
pre
sen
tati
on
Stay
ing
bal
ance
d in
th
e tr
ansi
tio
n; c
hem
ical
dep
end
ency
co
un
selo
r in
tro
du
ced
25
0
Pro
gram
tar
gete
d A
fric
an
Am
eric
an, L
atin
o/a
& N
ativ
e
Am
eric
an s
tud
ents
8/2
2/1
3O
HP
Ad
ult
& V
eter
an
pre
sen
tati
on
65
Co
mp
lian
ce w
ith
Man
dat
ory
GI
Bill
rec
ipie
nt
ori
enta
tio
n
8/2
5/1
3O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
CSI
Bac
k to
Sch
oo
l Bla
sto
ff
Ad
dre
ss c
on
cep
t o
f im
pai
rmen
t an
d d
ange
rs o
f
dri
nki
ng
and
dri
vin
g3
50
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
8/2
8/1
3K
SUP
DC
om
mu
nit
y N
igh
tSa
fety
& A
war
enes
s7
5R
esid
ent
Hal
l Lea
rnin
g
Co
mm
un
ity
9/5
/13
KSU
PD
Co
mm
un
ity
Nig
ht
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
30
Res
iden
t H
all L
earn
ing
Co
mm
un
ity
9/1
2/1
3K
SUP
DR
isk
Man
agem
ent
Co
nce
rns
Aw
aren
ess
30
Frat
ern
ity
9/1
2/1
3R
SC
asin
o N
igh
t
9/1
4/1
3O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
LNC
/SA
LSA
Fest
ival
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s3
8P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
9/1
6/1
3O
HP
Bin
ge D
rin
kin
g (F
YE)
Incr
ease
aw
aren
ess
of
alco
ho
l ab
use
; cri
mes
,
con
seq
uen
ces
and
th
e la
w3
0C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
9/2
5/1
3O
HP
OH
P T
able
at
Sup
po
rt a
nd
Men
tori
ng
Fair
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s6
5P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
9/3
0/1
3O
HP
Bin
ge D
rin
kin
g (F
YE)
Incr
ease
aw
aren
ess
of
alco
ho
l ab
use
; cri
mes
,
con
seq
uen
ces
and
th
e la
w2
7C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
10
/7/1
3O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
5R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
10
/8/1
3O
HP
Alc
oh
ol a
nd
Sex
ual
Hea
lth
Ad
dre
ss is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s re
late
d t
o h
igh
ris
k
beh
avio
r5
0C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
10
/14
/13
OH
PB
inge
Dri
nki
ng
(FYE
)In
crea
se a
war
enes
s o
f al
coh
ol a
bu
se; c
rim
es,
con
seq
uen
ces
and
th
e la
w2
0C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
10
/15
/13
OH
PO
HP
Tab
le a
t O
pen
Enro
llmen
t R
eso
urc
e Fa
ir
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s1
55
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
10
/16
/13
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
30
FYE
clas
sro
om
vis
it
10
/16
/13
KSU
PD
Flet
cher
/Man
ches
ter
Rav
eSa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 1
20
Res
. Hal
l
10
/16
/13
OH
P
OH
P T
able
at
Car
eers
in
Hig
her
Ed
uca
tio
n
Cel
ebra
tio
n
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s7
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
10
/17
/13
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
25
Res
. Hal
l1
0/1
7/1
3K
SUP
DH
allo
wee
n S
afet
y Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 2
5R
es. H
all
10
/17
/13
OH
PD
rug
Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
3R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
10
/17
/13
RS
Thin
k B
efo
re Y
ou
Dri
nk
10
/21
/13
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
21
Res
. Hal
l 1
0/2
1/1
3K
SUP
DH
allo
wee
n S
afet
y Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 6
5R
es. H
all
10
/21
/13
CSI
I Hav
e a
Ch
oic
e W
eek
P
rovi
de
Stu
den
ts w
ith
info
rmat
ion
ab
ou
t th
eir
cho
ices
an
d t
he
risk
s as
soci
ated
wit
h a
lco
ho
l5
0
Stu
den
ts h
and
ed o
ut
card
s
wit
h t
axi i
nfo
rmat
ion
to
enco
ura
ge s
afe
tran
spo
rtat
ion
if s
tud
ents
ch
oo
se t
o d
rin
k an
d
dri
ve.
10
/22
/13
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
40
FYE
clas
sro
om
vis
it1
0/2
2/1
3K
SUP
DH
allo
wee
n S
afet
y Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 5
0R
es. H
all
10
/22
/13
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
50
Res
. Hal
l 1
0/2
2/1
3K
SUP
DH
allo
wee
n S
afet
y Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 5
0R
es. H
all
10
/22
/13
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
50
Res
. Hal
l
10
/22
/13
CSI
I Hav
e a
Ch
oic
e W
eek
P
rovi
de
Stu
den
ts w
ith
info
rmat
ion
ab
ou
t th
eir
cho
ices
an
d t
he
risk
s as
soci
ated
wit
h a
lco
ho
l5
0
Stu
den
ts h
and
ed o
ut
card
s
wit
h t
axi i
nfo
rmat
ion
to
enco
ura
ge s
afe
tran
spo
rtat
ion
if s
tud
ents
ch
oo
se t
o d
rin
k an
d
dri
ve.
10
/23
/13
KSU
PD
I Hav
e a
Ch
oic
e W
eek
A
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
20
Soro
rity
Act
ivit
y 1
0/2
3/1
3K
SUP
DH
allo
wee
n B
rain
Can
dy
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
20
Wo
men
's C
tr. E
ven
t 1
0/2
3/1
3K
SUP
DH
allo
wee
n S
afet
y Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s2
0R
es. H
all
10
/23
/13
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
25
Res
. Hal
l1
0/2
3/1
3K
SUP
DH
allo
wee
n S
afet
y Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s3
0R
es. H
all
10
/23
/13
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
30
Res
. Hal
l
10
/23
/13
CSI
Vis
ion
Go
ggle
Ch
alle
nge
The
Ken
t p
olic
e w
ill h
elp
sh
ow
stu
den
ts h
ow
they
det
ect
peo
ple
un
der
th
e in
flu
ence
an
d t
he
con
seq
uen
ces
of
bei
ng
cau
ght.
60
Stu
den
ts w
ill t
ry t
hei
r sk
ills
wh
ile w
eari
ng
visi
on
imp
airi
ng
gogg
les.
10
/24
/13
KSU
PD
I Hav
e a
Ch
oic
e W
eek
Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
sm
ult
iple
Sa
fe C
om
m. &
So
rori
ty (
Tab
le
@ K
SC)
10
/24
/13
KSU
PD
Hal
low
een
Saf
ety
Safe
ty &
Aw
aren
ess
15
FYE
clas
sro
om
vis
it1
0/2
4/1
3K
SUP
DH
allo
wee
n S
afet
y Sa
fety
& A
war
enes
s 3
0R
es. H
all
10
/24
/13
CSI
Triv
ia D
ay: I
Hav
e a
Ch
oic
e
Wee
k
Po
rtag
e C
ou
nty
saf
ety
at a
tab
le w
ho
will
hav
e
fact
s an
d t
rivi
a ab
ou
t al
coh
ol s
afet
y6
0
Stu
den
ts c
an c
om
e an
d t
est
thei
r kn
ow
led
ge a
bo
ut
alco
ho
l
con
sum
pti
on
an
d w
in p
rize
s.
10
/25
/13
CSI
Soci
al M
edia
Blit
z
rega
rdin
g "I
Hav
e a
Ch
oic
e"
Use
#iH
avea
Ch
oic
e to
tw
eet
som
e sh
oki
ng
fact
they
fi a
bo
ut
som
eth
ing
alco
ho
l-re
late
d s
o
peo
ple
are
aw
are
just
ho
w d
ange
rou
s p
oo
r
cho
ices
can
be!
Stu
den
ts w
ill b
e ch
alki
ng
on
the
Ris
man
Pla
za t
o p
rom
ote
the
has
hta
g an
d o
ther
imp
ort
ant
fact
s re
late
d t
o
alco
ho
l aw
aren
ess
10
/28
/13
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
Ad
dre
ss is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s re
late
d t
o h
igh
ris
k
beh
avio
r3
0C
amp
us/
Co
mm
un
ity
Pre
sen
tati
on
10
/31
/13
OH
PC
lass
roo
m p
rese
nta
tio
n
Top
ic o
f "m
edic
atio
n a
ssti
sted
tre
atm
ent
for
pre
gnan
t w
om
en"
in E
mer
gin
g Is
sues
: Dru
gs &
Dru
g P
olic
y co
urs
e
11
/3/1
3O
HP
Frat
ern
ity
pre
sen
tati
on
Ph
i Kap
pa
Tau
- in
form
aito
n p
erta
inin
g to
alco
ho
l & d
rugs
30
11
/6/1
3O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
4R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
1/9
/14
OH
PIn
tern
atio
nal
Stu
den
t
Res
ou
rce
Fair
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s3
2P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
1/1
0/1
4O
HP
Gra
du
ate
Stu
den
t
Res
ou
rce
Fair
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s1
8P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
1/1
5/1
4O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
4R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
1/1
6/1
4O
HP
Dru
g A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
1R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
2/1
0/1
4O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
2R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
2/1
8/1
4O
HP
Bin
ge D
rin
kin
g (F
YE)
Ad
dre
ss is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s re
late
d t
o h
igh
ris
k
dri
nki
ng
9P
rogr
am e
valu
atio
n
2/1
9/1
4O
HP
Dru
g A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
1R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
3/1
3/1
4O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
2R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
3/1
7/1
4O
HP
Spri
ng
Bre
ak S
afet
y (F
YE)
Ad
dre
ss is
sues
an
d c
on
cern
s re
late
d t
o h
igh
ris
k
dri
nki
ng
8P
rogr
am e
valu
atio
n
3/1
8/1
4O
HP
Dru
g A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
5R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
3/1
8/1
4O
HP
Safe
Sp
rin
g B
reak
Kic
k-O
ff
Day
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s1
20
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
3/2
0/1
4O
HP
Spri
ng
Bre
ak H
ealt
h a
nd
Wel
lnes
s
Incr
ease
kn
ow
led
ge b
ase
on
AO
D is
sues
an
d
con
cern
s2
5P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
4/4
/14
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
4R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
4/7
/14
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
1R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
4/8
/14
OH
PP
ub
lick
Hea
lth
Fai
rIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dge
bas
e o
n A
OD
issu
es a
nd
con
cern
s1
45
Per
son
al F
eed
bac
k
4/1
0/1
4O
HP
Nat
ion
al A
lco
ho
l
Scre
enin
g D
ayR
edu
ce a
nd
pre
ven
t at
-ris
k d
rin
kin
g.1
66
AU
DIT
Scr
een
ing
Too
l
4/1
4/1
4O
HP
Alc
oh
ol A
war
enes
s
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
1R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
5/3
/14
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
8R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
5/5
/14
OH
PA
lco
ho
l Aw
aren
ess
Wo
rksh
op
Pre
ven
t an
d d
elay
use
of
alco
ho
l an
d o
ther
dru
gs a
nd
dim
inis
h t
he
po
ten
tial
fu
ture
har
m
resu
ltin
g fr
om
use
.
1R
efle
ctio
n P
aper
Spri
ng
14
OH
PA
OD
Issu
es
Ad
dre
ss A
OD
issu
es: e
.g. i
nte
rvie
w, p
roje
ct
reso
urc
es, p
erso
nal
ref
erra
l, w
ebsi
tes
for
term
pap
er in
form
atio
n, c
on
cern
fo
r a
frie
nd
.
6P
erso
nal
Fee
db
ack
Exac
t d
ates
no
t tr
acke
d
6/1
/14
RS
Ech
ecku
p t
o g
o p
rogr
am
(alc
oh
ol)
On
line
edu
cati
on
al s
anct
ion
27
1O
bta
ined
fro
m R
esid
ence
Serv
ices
dis
cip
linar
y st
atis
tics
6/1
/14
RS
Ech
ecku
p t
o g
o p
rogr
am
(mar
ijuan
a)O
nlin
e ed
uca
tio
nal
san
ctio
n2
4O
bta
ined
fro
m R
esid
ence
Serv
ices
dis
cip
linar
y st
atis
tics
CSI
7 p
rogr
ams
43
3K
SUP
D5
6 p
rogr
ams
17
36
OH
P1
10
pro
gram
s5
11
4To
tal P
rogr
ams:
18
0R
S7
pro
gram
s6
82
Tota
l Att
en
de
es:
79
65
Appendix 2: Annual DFSCA notification (2013 & 2014)
Appendix 3: Code of Student Conduct update email (2013 & 2014)
AY 2012- 2013 Disciplinary Statistics (abbreviated) Number of Students referred to OSC
Fall 2012 334
Spring 2013 274
Total 608
Academic Classification of Students referred to OSC
Class Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Total Percentage
Freshman 134 98 232 38.16%
Sophomore 120 111 231 37.99%
Junior 54 46 100 16.45%
Senior 24 18 42 6.91%
Graduate 2 1 3 0.49%
Referral Source
Referral Source Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Total Percentage
Dining Services 0 3 3 0.50%
Fire Safety 3 5 8 1.33%
KSU Police 168 89 257 42.62%
OSC 12 12 24 3.98%
Parking 0 13 13 2.16%
Recreation Services 2 0 2 0.33%
Residence Services 150 146 296 49.09%
Summary of Charges filed against Students
Charge Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Total Percentage
Alcohol 130 95 225 25.68%
Animals 0 0 0 0.00%
Arson 0 0 0 0.00%
Complicity 15 23 38 4.34%
Computer Misuse 1 1 2 0.23%
Controlled Substances 50 43 93 10.62%
Destruction/Misuse of Property 12 10 22 2.51%
Discrimination 2 2 4 0.46%
Disorderly Conduct 33 52 85 9.70%
Gambling 0 0 0 0.00%
General Safety 13 12 25 2.85%
Harassment 4 13 17 1.94%
Hazing 0 0 0 0.00%
Impaired Driving 0 0 0 0.00%
Laws 23 10 33 3.77%
Misrepresentation 10 6 16 1.83%
Physical Violence 11 10 21 2.40%
Reasonable Request 23 37 60 6.85%
Recording Privacy 0 0 0 0.00%
Residence Hall Policies 1 0 1 0.11%
Escort 5 2 7 0.80%
Illegal Appliance 2 0 2 0.23%
Odor of Marijuana 18 26 44 5.02%
Misuse of University Keys 2 4 6 0.68%
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 51 29 80 9.13%
Restroom 1 4 5 0.57%
Room Capacity 13 5 18 2.05%
Visitation 2 8 10 1.14%
Sexual Misconduct 6 4 10 1.14%
Smoking 1 0 1 0.11%
Student Conduct Process 0 0 0 0.00%
Theft 10 9 19 2.17%
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 8 5 13 1.48%
University Grounds 1 0 1 0.11%
University Rules 5 4 9 1.03%
Weapons 4 5 9 1.03%
Summary of Sanctions for Students
Sanction Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Total Percentage
Disciplinary Probation 144 122 266 25.63%
Workshop (Court ordered) 73 62 135 13.01%
Reflection Paper 74 41 115 11.08%
Warning 57 34 91 8.77%
Workshop (Alcohol) 33 11 44 4.24%
Campus Involvement Reflection 27 16 43 4.14%
Website Review 29 10 39 3.76%
Persona Non Grata 25 10 35 3.37%
Counseling 18 15 33 3.18%
Community Service 21 7 28 2.70%
Residence Hall Restriction 10 17 27 2.60%
Disciplinary Suspension 12 13 25 2.41%
Workshop (Ethics) 8 13 21 2.02%
No Contact 8 12 20 1.93%
Workshop (Drug) 11 7 18 1.73%
Letter of Apology 8 6 14 1.35%
Other 3 11 14 1.35%
Academic Success Center 4 8 12 1.16%
Academic Reflection 4 7 11 1.06%
Restitution 5 4 9 0.87%
Interview 2 6 8 0.77%
Career Services 1 5 6 0.58%
Presentation 4 1 5 0.48%
Disciplinary Dismissal 4 1 5 0.48%
Monetary Penalty 3 2 5 0.48%
Bulletin Board 2 3 5 0.48%
Room/Hall Reassignment 2 1 3 0.29%
Ineligible hold 1 0 1 0.10%
Rate of Recidivism – cumulative total for Fall 2012 and Spring 2013
73 repeat Students / 490 individual Students referred to OSC = 14.9%
Total Hearings
# of HEARINGS Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Total Percentage
Sanction Hearings 147 117 264 54.43%
Hearing Panels 111 110 221 45.57%
Totals 258 227 485
Appeals
# of APPEALS Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Total % Appeals % of Hearings
Sanction Hearings 3 3 6 19.35% 2.27%
Hearing Panels 13 12 25 80.65% 11.31%
Total 16 15 31 6.39%
AY 2013-14 Disciplinary Statistics (abbreviated)
Number of Students referred to OSC
AY 2013-14: 522
Academic Classification of Students referred to OSC
Class F 2013 S 2014 Total Percentage
Freshman 148 108 256 49.04%
Sophomore 81 103 184 35.25%
Junior 17 32 49 9.39%
Senior 16 15 31 5.94%
Graduate 2 0 2 0.386%
Referral Source
Referral Source F 2013 S 2014 AY 2013-14 Percentage
Dining Services 0 0 0 0.00%
Fire Safety 2 15 17 3.22%
KSU Police 116 105 221 41.86%
OSC 4 2 6 1.14%
Parking 0 0 0 0.00%
Recreation Services 2 3 5 0.95%
Residence Services 137 129 266 50.38%
Student Center 1 4 5 0.95%
Other 2 6 8 1.52%
Summary of Charges filed against Students
Charge F 2013 S 2014 Total Percentage
Alcohol 119 98 217 32.15%
Animals 0 0 0 0.00%
Arson 0 0 0 0.00%
Complicity 32 21 53 7.85%
Computer Misuse 0 0 0 0.00%
Controlled Substances 43 37 80 11.85%
Destruction/Misuse of Property 13 9 22 3.26%
Discrimination 0 0 0 0.00%
Disorderly Conduct 19 26 45 6.67%
Gambling 0 0 0 0.00%
General Safety 10 21 31 4.59%
Harassment 2 2 4 0.59%
Hazing 0 0 0 0.00%
Impaired Driving 0 0 0 0.00%
Laws 6 12 18 2.67%
Misrepresentation 6 5 11 1.63%
Physical Violence 6 13 19 2.81%
Appendix 4: Office of Student Conduct data (AY 2012-13 & 2013-14)
Reasonable Request 12 21 33 4.89%
Recording Privacy 0 1 1 0.15%
Residence Hall Policies 56 40 96 14.22%
Sexual Misconduct 4 1 5 0.74%
Smoking 0 0 0 0.00%
Student Conduct Process 0 1 1 0.15%
Theft 8 4 12 1.78%
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 6 9 15 2.22%
University Grounds 0 0 0 0.00%
University Rules 1 3 4 0.59%
Weapons 0 8 8 1.19%
Summary of Sanctions for Students
Sanction Fall 2013 Spring 2014 AY 2013-14 Percentage
Status: Disciplinary Probation 99 115 140 15.07%
Status: Warning 61 41 176 18.95%
Status: Disciplinary Suspension 4 9 13 1.40%
Status: Disciplinary Dismissal 3 5 8 0.86%
Workshop (Court ordered) 78 70 148 15.93%
Reflection Paper 31 23 55 5.92%
Workshop (Alcohol) 22 17 39 4.20%
Peer Involvement Advising 20 14 34 3.66%
Community Service 11 15 26 2.80%
Website Review 17 9 26 2.80%
Workshop (Ethics) 5 20 25 2.69%
Workshop (Drug) 13 11 24 2.58%
Campus Involvement Reflection 14 7 21 2.26%
Counseling 6 15 21 2.26%
Interview 11 10 21 2.26%
Career Services 4 16 20 2.15%
Hallways Handbook Reflection 8 7 15 1.61%
Residence Hall Restriction 4 10 14 1.51%
Persona Non Grata 9 5 14 1.51%
Letter of Apology 3 10 13 1.40%
Workshop (Stress Management) 7 6 13 1.40%
Other 6 6 12 1.29%
No Contact 5 4 9 0.97%
Academic Success Center 1 6 7 0.75%
Monetary Penalty 3 4 7 0.75%
Academic Reflection 6 1 7 0.75%
Ineligible Hold Stipulation 2 3 5 0.54%
Bulletin Board 3 1 4 0.43%
Presentation 3 1 4 0.43%
Restitution 1 2 3 0.32%
Save my semester Workshop 1 2 3 0.32%
Room/Hall Reassignment 1 1 2 0.22%
Rate of Recidivism
37 repeat Students / 496 individual Students referred to OSC = 7.46%
Total Hearings
# of HEARINGS Fall 2013 Spring 2014 AY 2013-14 Percentage
Sanction Hearings 122 103 225 56.25%
Hearing Panels 71 104 175 43.75%
Totals 400
Appeals
# of APPEALS Fall 2013 Spring 2014 AY 2013-14 % of Appeals % of Hearings
Sanction Hearings 2 1 3 12% 1.33%
Hearing Panels 7 15 22 88% 12.57%
Total 25 6.25%
1
Department of Residence Services Disciplinary Statistics
AY 2012/2013
A Compilation of Reports Related to
Department Disciplinary Statistics and Security Operations
Compiled by Brian C. Hellwig,
Assistant Director for Residential Safety & Security
June 2013
Appendix 5: Residence Services data (AY 2012-13 & 2013-14)
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview and Statistics: 2012 - 2013 5
Key Security Facts for AY 12/13 5
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day 5
Tri Towers Guest Registration 6
Alcohol Incidents Called into Security 6
Centralized Discipline Overview 7
Fire Safety Room Inspections 8
Residence Hall Fire Alarms 10
Winter Break Closing Violation Information 10
Spring Break Closing Violation Information 11
Non-Conduct AY Child IR Totals in Advocate 11
Conduct AY Child IR Totals in Advocate 12
Number of Child IR’s Per Person 13
Five-Year Comparison of Select Policy Violations 14
Odor of Marijuana Incidents per Hall 14
Alcohol Incidents per Hall 15
Total Conduct Incidents per Hall 16
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts 17
Student Conduct Referrals 17
eCHECKUP (Online Alcohol Workshop) 17
Parental Notification 18
Community Billing 18
Psychological Referral Letters 18
3
Ethical Decision Making Initiatives 18
All Residence Services Sanctions Issued to Students 19
Student Conduct Revenue 19
KSUPD Vandalism Calls to Residence Halls 20
Policy Recommendations for 2013-2014 21
Fall 2012 Overview and Statistics 23
Key Security Facts for Fall 2012 24
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day 24
Residence Hall Fire Alarms 26
Fire Safety Room Inspections 26
Tri Towers Rotunda Guest Registration 27
Centralized Discipline Overview – Fall 2012 28
Winter Break Closing Violations 29
Alcohol Incidents Called Into Security 30
Fall 2011 vs. 2012 Alcohol Incidents per Hall 31
Fall 2011 vs. 2012 Odor of Marijuana Incidents per Hall 33
Fall 2011 vs. 2012 Total # of Conduct Incidents per Hall 34
Fall 2012 Conduct Child IR Totals 35
Fall 2012 Non-Conduct Child IR Totals 36
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts for Fall 36
Spring 2013 Overview and Statistics 39
Key Security Facts for Spring 2013 40
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day 40
Residence Hall Fire Alarms 43
Tri Towers Guest Registration 43
4
Centralized Discipline Overview – Spring 2013 44
Alcohol Incidents Called into Security 45
Spring 2012 vs. 2013 Alcohol Incidents per Hall 46
2013 Spring Break Closing Violations 47
Spring 2012 vs. 2013 Odor of Marijuana Incidents per Hall 48
Spring 2012 vs. 2013 Total # of Conduct Incidents per Hall 49
Spring 2013 Conduct Child IR Totals 50
Spring 2013 Non-Conduct Child IR Totals 51
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts for Spring 52
5
Overview of AY 12/13 Information
Listed below are Security stats at a glance for the AY 12/13. For comparison purposes a
summary of similar stats are shared from the previous academic year.
Key Security Facts for AY 12/13
Security Aides responded to a total of 1,944 incidents
1,027 (53%) out of the 1,944 incidents were for noise complaints
o The remaining 47% of incidents responded to included everything from EMS
calls, alcohol incidents (though many alcohol incidents start out first as a noise
issue), fire alarms, domestic disputes, controlled substance issues, etc.
Security Aides completed 458 escorts
By Comparison – AY 11/12
Security Aides responded to a total of 2,917 incidents
1,681 (58%) out of the 2,917 incidents were for noise complaints
Security Aides completed 386 escorts
The number of incidents Security staff responded decreased by 33% from the previous year.
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day
The chart below illustrates the 2,917 incidents that Security responded to by hour and day for the
entire academic year. Thursday nights continue to be the busiest and most active nights on
campus.
AY 12/13 Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 6 11 17 10 9 13 27 93
9:00 - 10:00 32 21 21 33 57 36 67 267
10:00 - 11:00 32 22 29 24 88 32 82 309
11:00 - 12:00 36 32 38 32 80 40 64 322
12:00 - 1:00 45 28 38 42 52 36 44 285
1:00 - 2:00 31 30 37 45 66 34 60 303
2:00 - 3:00 26 21 28 19 50 41 75 260
3:00 - 4:00 9 5 7 6 26 20 32 105
TOTAL 217 170 215 211 428 252 451 1944
6
Tri-Towers Rotunda Guest Registration
Overview of Policy
Between the hours of 12:00 am – 4:00 am during the mornings of Friday, Saturday and Sunday
the Tri Towers Rotunda is restricted access to only KSU students who show their KSU ID and to
registered guests of residential students who are issued a wrist band. Only residential KSU
students are permitted to register up to two guests per weekend. Residential students must
register with their guest in person at the Tri Towers Desk between the hours of 8:00 am – 10:00
pm. Registered guests are issued a colored wrist band (with the color changing randomly each
week) listing their and their host’s information which they must wear - and show - in order to
gain entry into the Tri Rotunda during the restricted hours and also be accompanied by their host
at the time of entry. There are security personnel stationed at each of the four entrances leading
into the Tri Rotunda to enforce this policy during the restricted hours each weekend.
Summary
During this academic year there were 592 students who registered 714 guests. Of the 714 guests,
86 (12%) were from out-of-state. 45 (52%) of the 86 out-of-state guests came from
Pennsylvania. By comparison, in AY 2011-2012 there were 660 students who registered 782
guests, of which 130 guests were from out-of-state.
All signed guest registration forms for each semester are stored in the Security Office and are in
alphabetical order (by the host’s last name) and are separated by week. These forms will remain
in the Security Office for at least one full year after the conclusion of the semester in which they
were issued.
Alcohol Incidents Called Into Security
In the 2012-2013 academic year there were 147 incidents (down 9% from the previous year)
involving alcohol (that met our Department’s definition of a “party”) that were called into
Security that required the Assistant Director for Safety & Security and/or Assistant Security
Manager to respond to. There were 787 people documented in these 147 incidents. The KSUPD
were called for 65 (44%) of these incidents. 135 (17%) people were issued citations by KSUPD
for various alcohol offenses, though most were for prohibitions charges. This represents a
decline of about 10% in the number of people that were documented by police from the previous
year in which 142 people were issued citations.
These alcohol incidents occurred during the following days of the week:
Sunday (12); Monday (1); Tuesday (3); Wednesday (4); Thursday (39); Friday (31), and
Saturday (57).
7
Centralized Discipline Overview
This was the fourth year in which the centralized discipline process has been used whereby all
incident reports written by student and professional staff members are first reviewed by one
person (Assistant Director, Safety & Security) who reviews them and then distributes them out
among the RHD staff. The goal and purpose of this new process was to 1) more equally
distribute the discipline workload among the RHD staff and 2) help to ensure that individual
sanctions are more consistent among all the students involved in the one incident.
Each RHD was generally assigned between 233 – 238 conduct Child Incident Report cases in
Advocate during the 2012-2013 academic year, with a total of 2,836 cases being assigned. These
2,836 cases represent a nearly 9% decrease in the number of cases assigned to RHD’s from the
previous year.
These numbers do not reflect non-conduct type of cases (i.e., flu-like, vandalism, psychological,
EMS, roommate issue/concerns, etc.) nor do they reflect the 1,866 Winter Break Closing and 745
Spring Break Closing cases that were inputted into Advocate.
Kim’s Area (Tri, Twin, Eastway, Van Campen):
Fall Spring AY Total
Yeye Odunaiya 144 90 234
David Haas 146 90 236
Laura Forchione 146 65 211
Beth Chambers 147 91 238
Curtis Clark 145 93 238
Justin Khol 144 93 237
TOTAL 872 522 1,394
8
Josette’s Area (Quad, New Front, Centennials):
Fall Spring AY Total
Jackie Haramis 142 91 233
Leah Carothers 41 64 105
Katie Sorokas 144 90 234
Laura De’Armond 146 90 236
Matt Musgrave 143 94 237
Marquita Rodgers 95 64 159
John Hummell 145 93 238
TOTAL 856 586 1,442
GRAND TOTAL 2,836 Child Incident Report Cases
(Does not include Winter and Spring Break Closing violations)
Fire Safety Room Inspections (new for AY 2012-2013)
Due to the large number of fire safety violations being found during Winter and Spring closings,
the Department of Residence Services implemented a new Fire Safety Room Inspection process
of all resident’s rooms in the first few weeks of the fall semester in order to identify and educate
residents regarding these potential fire safety hazards before the end of the semester. It is hoped
that this will also dramatically reduce the number of violations being found during the Winter
and Spring Break Closings. There were 850 rooms documented for mostly fire safety violations
during the Fire Safety Room Inspection process, which occurred during the 3rd
and 4th
week of
the fall semester.
Our goal was then to see a 30% reduction in the overall number of rooms being documented over
Winter Break, which would have only been 595 rooms documented. Over the Winter Break
there were 833 rooms documented for Fire Safety/General Safety violations resulting in a
reduction rate of only 2%, far less than the 30% reduction rate that was hoped for. The chart on
the next page shows a comparison of each resident hall and the percentage change from
September to Winter Break Inspections.
9
While some halls did well, and met the goal, others did not do as well. It is promising that we
did see a reduction – however slight – in number of rooms documented at Winter Break.
It is therefore recommended that we continue with these fire safety reduction efforts for at least
once more year to see if we can gain traction and continue to reduce the number of fire safety
violations being found in the residence halls.
Number of Rooms Found with Fire Safety/General Safety Violations
Hall
# Rooms in
Sept.
# Rooms @
WB % Change
Allyn 52 29 -44%
Beall 60 84 40%
CCA 35 9 -74%
CCB 19 18 -1%
CCC 25 16 -36%
CCD 26 7 -73%
CCE 35 31 -11%
CCF 49 15 -69%
Clark 44 33 -25%
Dunbar ? 49* N/A
Engleman 7 3 -57%
Fletcher 8 21 163%
Johnson 13 20 54%
Koonce 50 61 22%
Korb 15 22 47%
Lake 50 43 -14%
Leebrick 19 31 63%
Manchester 16 20 25%
McDowell 77 83 8%
Olson 50 54 8%
Prentice 3 97 3233%
Stopher 19 7 -63%
Verder 37 32 -14%
Wright 141 97 -31%
TOTAL 850 833 -2%
* Not counted in WB total due to no Sept. comparison numbers.
10
Residence Hall Fire Alarms
During the AY 2012-2013 there were 150 fire alarms that occurred in the residence halls that
resulted in the fire department being dispatched to the residence halls. This is down from the
previous AY 2011-2012 in which there were 166 fire alarms in the residence halls.
Winter Break Closing Violation Information
Students found in violation of a policy violation during Winter Break and Spring Break room
checks are contacted by the RHD of the hall where they live upon their return to campus. In
most cases (general safety violations) the RHD will issue a Letter of Warning to the student
requesting that the safety violation be corrected and then hall staff follow up to make sure the
item is removed (if applicable) or violation remedied. If it is a different type of policy violation
(i.e., alcohol) then the RHD will meet with the student(s) involved for a disciplinary meeting. In
either case, such violations are inputted into the Advocate database.
Winter Break Conduct and Non-Conduct Child IR Totals
Conduct Offense Type
Alcohol 20
Odor of Marijuana 4
Destruction/Misuse University Property 11
General Safety 1,653
Illegal Appliance 28
Theft 17
Smoking 2
Residence Hall Policies 312
Weapons 2
Disorderly Conduct 2
Reasonable Request 2
University Rules 1
Non-Conduct Offense Type
Facilities Issues/Concerns/Problems 36
General Issue/Concern 198
Vandalism/Graffiti 3
NOTE: The vast majority of Winter Break Policy Violations revolved around fire safety types of issues
(i.e., excessive strands of lights, posters and tapestry on the ceiling, excessive and/or improper use of
extension cords, etc.).
11
Spring Break Closing Violation Information
Spring Break Conduct and Non-Conduct Child IR Totals
Conduct Offense Type
Alcohol 36
Animals 1
Destruction/Misuse of Property 4
General Safety 774
Reasonable Request 3
Residence Hall Policies 75
Residence Hall Policies – Illegal Appliance(s) 37
Theft 8
Odor of Marijuana 12
Controlled Substances 2
Misuse of University Keys 1
Weapons 2
Non-Conduct Offense Type
General Issue/Concern 37
Room Entry
NOTE: Similar to Winter Break violations, the vast majority of issues revolved around fire safety issues.
Non-Conduct 2012-2013 Academic Year Child IR Totals in Advocate
AY 12-13 Non- Conduct Child IR Totals
Damage 14
Early Alert Notice 0
EMS 65
Facilities Issues/Concerns/Problem 50
General Issues/Concerns 341
Flu-Like Symptoms 22
Illness/Injury 132
Mental Health Issue/Concern 45
Missing Person 0
Parent Issue/Concern 9
Resident Issue/Concern 216
Room Entry 6
Roommate Issue/Conflict 30
Vandalism/Graffiti 138
12
By comparison, one of the biggest difference from the previous 2011-2012 AY is that there were
241 Vandalism/Graffiti incidents recorded compared to the 137 recorded this year.
Conduct 2012-2013 Academic Year Child IR Totals in Advocate
AY 12-13 Conduct Child IR Totals Escort 136
Odor of Marijuana 658
Illegal Appliance 73
Computer Misuse 3
Misuse of University Keys 148
Alcohol 1,126
Improper Room Change 9
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 1,167
Animals 8
Restroom 70
Room Capacity 165
Visitation 135
Complicity 63
Controlled Substances 215
Destruction/Misuse of Property 151
Discrimination 4
Disorderly Conduct 185
Gambling 0
General Safety 2,624
Harassment 50
Laws 8
Misrepresentation 42
Physical Violence 16
Residence Hall Policies 414
Reasonable Request 224
Smoking 92
Theft 65
Sexual Misconduct 4
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 19
Student Conduct Process 1
University Rules 10
Weapons 7
University Grounds 1
13
Interesting Alcohol Facts for AY 12/13
Females accounted for 53% of the total alcohol violations.
Males accounted for 47% of the total alcohol violations.
93 students had TWO repeat Alcohol violations.
21 students had THREE repeat Alcohol violations.
1 student had SEVEN repeat Alcohol violations.
2 non-students had TWO repeat Alcohol violations.
Last year 102 students had two repeat alcohol violations and 9 students had three repeat alcohol
policy violations.
Number of Child IR’s Per Person
During the AY 12/13 the following individuals had x number of Child Incident
Reports issued for them:
# of people with 1 Child IR…..…2,717
# of people with 2 Child IR’s….…..836
# of people with 3 Child IR’s….…..341
# of people with 4 Child IR’s…….…128
# of people with 5 Child IR’s………...57
# of people with 6 Child IR’s………...18
# of people with 7 Child IR’s………….10
# of people with 8 Child IR’s…………..6
# of people with 9 Child IR’s……….….4
# of people with 10 Child IR’s…………1
We saw fewer students documented (about 6% less) this year (4,118) than were documented last
year (4,392). Last year there were 2,878 students with one Child IR, whereas there are 2,717 this
year. Additionally, last year the most IR’s any student had was one student with 13 Child IR’s,
whereas this year it was one student with 10 Child IR’s.
14
Five-Year Comparison of Select Policy Violations
Change Over 5 Years
Odor of Marijuana
AY 08/09
AY 09/10
AY 10/11
AY 11/12
AY 12/13
% from 11/12
% from 08/09
Parent IR's 100 90 257 269 293 9%
193%
Child IR's 234 210 523 585 673 15%
188%
Controlled Substances
Parent IR's 66 47 122 80 92 15%
39%
Child IR's 157 116 248 185 215 16%
37%
Alcohol
Parent IR's 411 289 318 315 297 -6%
-28%
Child IR’s 1,647 1,084 1,165 1,206 1,105 -8%
-33%
While we continued to see an overall increase in the number of controlled substance incidents in
the residence halls, we are seeing a decrease in the number of incidents involving alcohol in the
residence halls.
AY 11/12 v. 12/13 Odor of Marijuana Incidents
Hall AY 11/12 Parent IR's
AY 11/12 Child IR's
AY 12/13 Parent IR's
AY 12/13 Child IR's
Allerton 0 0 0 0
Allyn 15 35 13 31
Beall 8 15 22 50
CCA 5 18 4 12
CCB 5 6 8 16
CCC 2 4 0 0
CCD 3 9 1 4
CCE 4 24 7 28
CCF 5 15 9 28
Clark 15 36 20 46
Dunbar 16 33 26 60
Engleman 1 1 3 13
Fletcher 9 17 9 23
Johnson 0 0 0 0
Koonce 22 42 39 83
Korb 4 8 11 24
Lake 20 45 34 75
Leebrick 14 20 12 14
Manchester 15 37 11 29
15
McDowell 5 6 9 18
Olson 30 67 4 5
Prentice 26 64 14 24
Stopher 0 0 1 4
Van Campen 0 0 1 4
Verder 16 34 10 20
Wright 29 49 25 62
TOTAL 269 585 293 673
% Change 9% 15%
AY 11/12 vs. 12/13 Alcohol Incidents per Hall
Hall 11/12 Parent IR's
11/12 Child IR's
12/13 Parent IR's
12/13 Child IR's
Allerton 0 0 3 5
Allyn 18 75 13 56
Beall 18 88 26 101
CCA 16 75 17 67
CCB 9 44 10 60
CCC 3 14 3 5
CCD 9 34 5 27
CCE 10 33 17 58
CCF 4 14 15 62
Clark 14 59 16 63
Dunbar 9 38 12 34
Engleman 3 14 4 20
Fletcher 11 31 14 60
Johnson 1 1 2 6
Koonce 42 161 26 89
Korb 18 51 11 29
Lake 16 55 23 78
Leebrick 11 27 3 5
Manchester 14 79 13 49
McDowell 18 100 20 76
Olson 14 41 6 12
Prentice 20 91 9 36
Stopher 2 3 3 15
Van Campen 2 5 1 5
16
Verder 13 43 8 27
Wright 20 62 17 62
TOTAL 315 1,206 297 1,105
Percent Change -6% -8%
AY 11/21 vs. 12/13 Total Number of Conduct Incidents per Hall
Hall AY 11/12 Parent IR's
AY 11/12 Child IR's
AY 12/13 Parent IR's
AY 12/13 Child IR's
Allerton 1 1 5 8
Allyn 76 191 91 273
Beall 43 129 87 214
CCA 95 235 61 164
CCB 72 174 47 135
CCC 76 91 44 56
CCD 83 185 58 149
CCE 65 159 65 163
CCF 67 184 62 168
Clark 92 229 86 223
Dunbar 52 155 57 122
Engleman 7 24 8 37
Fletcher 72 147 47 134
Johnson 10 20 14 43
Koonce 244 591 184 457
Korb 101 200 60 143
Lake 83 191 106 263
Leebrick 68 106 54 69
Manchester 100 215 66 182
McDowell 79 199 78 174
Olson 79 173 26 43
Prentice 75 230 77 142
Stopher 23 30 13 33
Van Campen 13 24 7 21
Verder 85 192 47 90
Wright 292 586 176 406
TOTAL 2,053 4,597 1,647 3,912
% Change -20% -14%
17
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts
Student Conduct Referrals:
The Department of Residence Services attempts to resolve student disciplinary issues at the
lowest level possible and aim to take an educational approach in addressing these disciplinary
issues – some of which are listed below. When those options have been exhausted then a student
is referred to the Office of Student Conduct for a formal disciplinary hearing. This past
academic year the Office of Student Conduct reported that 296 students were referred to their
office from Residence Services. This accounts for about 49% of their offices’ entire case load
for the year. By comparison, last year there were 285 students referred to Student Conduct from
Residence Services.
eCHECKUP (Online Alcohol Workshop):
In an effort to provide an additional educational component to our inventory of sanctions, the
online eCHECKUP TO GO Alcohol workshop was purchased and staff began to utilize it as a
sanctioning tool starting in the spring 2012 semester. Students found responsible for their first
alcohol policy violation by an A/RHD were to be assigned this online workshop as part of their
sanction. These students then had to verify that they completed the survey so that the RHD
issuing the sanction would know that the sanction had been completed. 390 people completed
the survey this past year, while 339 of those students verified that they had completed the survey.
The survey is live and online and can be completed by anyone, which is why there may be more
students taking the survey than are being assigned to do so.
Demographic information of those who completed eCHECKUP:
Males: 39% Females: 61%
Greek: 11% Non-Greek: 89%
Athletes: 7% Non-Athletes: 93%
Students spent on average about $12.26 per week on alcohol
On average the highest BAC in a typical week for students was 0.12
On the median, students drank about 16 beers per month
Additional Information:
For 339 of the students assigned eCHECKUP, this was their first alcohol violation.
35 students had an alcohol policy violation prior to the start of the spring 2012 semester.
After being assigned eCHECKUP…
o 25 students were found in violation of the alcohol policy one more time
The recidivism rate was 7.4% for those students assigned to eCHECKUP
18
Parental Notification:
The Department of Residence Services notifies the parents/guardians of residence hall students
under the age of 21 if their student is found to be in violation of the residence hall alcohol
policies and who has not been cited by the police or referred to Student Conduct. A/RHD’s
notify their supervisor when a student is documented and found responsible for violation of the
alcohol policy and the Assistant Director, Residential Communities for each area send these
letters to the students’ permanent addresses.
During the AY 12/13, 356 students were issued Parental Notification Letters. By comparison,
261 students received a PNL in AY 11/2, 194 students in AY 10/11 and 92 students received a
PNL in AY 09/10.
Community Billing:
All floor/community residents can collectively be held responsible for damages to public areas
that cannot be attributed to specific individuals.
The AY 12/13 saw 17 separate community billings resulting in a total amount of $5,659.01. By
comparison, last year there were 15 separate community billings resulting in a total of $5,190.61.
Psychological Referral Letters:
The Department of Residence Services will issue a student who has experienced a psychological
crisis a letter mandating they be evaluated by the university’s Psychological Services Office
before they can be cleared to remain in on-campus housing. The AY 12/13 there were 41
students issued a Psychological Referral Letter, compared to 45 Psychological Referral Letters
being issued during the AY 11/12.
30 were from the Tri/Twin/Eastway area, 9 were from the Quad/NF/CC’s area and 2 were from
Allerton.
Ethical Decision Making Initiatives:
During the fall 2012 semester, the Office of Student Conduct created a new two-hour Decision
Making and Ethics Workshop that A/RHD’s and Hearing Officers can utilize as an educational
sanctioning tool.
o During the Spring Semester, there were 4 Decision Making and Ethics Workshops
scheduled.
o A total of 39 students were assigned to attend, 10 (26%) students were No-Shows
and 4 (10%) of students were turned away because they did no complete the
workbook prior to the workshop.
19
The Department of Residence Services created a new Ethical Decision Making Webpage that
was unveiled for spring 2013, linked from our homepage, where students who are assigned to
complete e-CHECKUP must now view and complete a short Ethical Decision Quiz before they
receive the link to complete e-CHECKUP. This new webpage replaces the former “Do U Herd?”
webpage and campaign.
Listing of All Residence Services Sanctions Issued to Students in AY 12/13:
Residence Services Sanction Number
RS - Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO Program 387
RS - Behavioral Contract 10
RS - Decision Making and Ethics Workshop 14
RS - Letter of Warning 1152
RS - No Sanction Issued 62
RS - Parent/Guardian Notification Letter 383
RS - Reflection Paper - Other 78
RS - Reflection Paper on ALCOHOL USE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 15
RS - Reflection Paper on DECISION MAKING 44
RS - Reflection Paper on DRUG USE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 3
RS - Reflection Paper on LEGAL AND PROFESSIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF DRUG USE 18
RS - Reflection Paper on RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS 48
RS - Reflection Project 22
RS - Reflection Questions for use with eCHECKUP TO GO PROGRAM 144
RS - Restitution for Damages 12
RS- Community Service 20
RS-Other 115
NOTE: The “RS – Other” sanction included sanctions such as requiring a student to attend hall
council meetings, writing a letter of apology to RA or staff member, create an education program
or poster/bulletin board around alcohol, or remove a fire safety violation item from the room.
Student Conduct Revenue
Students who attend a Student Conduct hearing and who plead responsible for are found
responsible are issued an automatic hearing fee and sometimes are also assigned additional fines
by the Hearing Officer. The revenue from this office for this fiscal year was $16,775.09. FY ’12
was $16,871.21 followed by FY ’11 at $25,890 followed by FY ‘10 at $33,071 $17,798 in FY
’09 respectively.
20
KSUPD Vandalism Calls to Residence Halls
During this academic year the KSU Police Department took 123 reports for various acts of
vandalism that occurred in the residence halls on campus. 20% came from Prentice Hall, which
had a large number of reported burning of flyers and bulletin boards in the building. The
following list indicates in which halls these reports originated from for the past three years.
Hall/Location AY 10/11 AY 11/12 AY 12/13 Allerton 0 0 2
Allyn 7 6 12
Beall 0 1 2
CCA 3 1 3
CCB 5 0 4
CCC 0 1 2
CCD 2 1 2
CCE 1 4 7
CCF 2 3 1
Clark 6 6 9
Dunbar 2 4 3
Engleman 1 1 0
Fletcher 10 9 8
Koonce 9 12 7
Korb 0 8 2
Lake 24 6 8
Manchester 9 12 3
McDowell 0 1 3
Olson 3 4 7
Prentice 11 3 25
Tri Rotunda 5 5 3
Verder 14 14 2
Wright 0 5 3
TOTAL 121 107 123
21
Policy Recommendations for 2013-2014
Continuation of Existing Policies/Practices:
The Tri-Towers Rotunda Guest Registration policy continues to have a positive effect
on the overall safety and security of the Tri Rotunda area after midnight on the weekends
by limiting access of non-students. Due to Rosie’s Diner being a 24-hour operation, it
requires additional security during these late night hours so that we can avoid previous
incidents of violence caused mainly by non-students looking for a late-night place to eat
in Kent.
Contacting KSU Police for Alcohol Parties in the residence halls seems to be effective in
reducing the number of alcohol violations. During the time that this policy has been in
place we have seen a decrease in the number of alcohol incidents and decrease in the
number of students being documented for an alcohol policy violation. Additionally, the
percentage of time that the KSU police have been called for “alcohol policies” has
decreased to fewer than 45% of the “alcohol parties”. Simply stated, we are seeing
positive results. For these reasons, this practice of contacting KSU police for “alcohol
parties” should continue for the foreseeable future.
The more intentional enforcement of the Quiet Hours policy the past two years should
continue for the next academic year. Residential students continue to disclose through
the EBI survey that living in a quieter environment is important for study and sleep
reasons, but yet their community still remains too noisy at times.
This past year was the first complete academic year that saw the introduction of the
eCHECKUP TO GO online alcohol survey for students being found responsible for an
alcohol policy violation. This tool that was introduced to the A/RHD staff to help
provide an additional educational resource for addressing underage drinking on-campus.
The recidivism rate for the students completing eCHECKUP this year was 7.4%. It is too
early to tell what impact this is having on residents, but current results are favorable, so
and additional academic year using eCHECKUP as an educational tool should continue.
The centralized distribution of student disciplinary cases to RHDs continues to work well
with our Centralized Discipline model. RHDs continue to be assigned about the same
number of student discipline cases to hear each semester, thereby creating a more
balanced and equal distribution of the discipline workload among the entire RHD staff.
This practice should continue to for the foreseeable future.
This past year saw the implementation of Fire Safety Room Inspections in the first 3-4
weeks of the fall semester. While we only saw a slight 2% reduction in fire safety policy
22
violations, it is believed that with additional education on the part of the residents and
more buy-in from the hall staff, particularly the RA staff, that this initiative can be a
beneficial one and help us to achieve our desired departmental goal of 30% reduction in
fire safety policy violation.
For Future Recommendations:
Additional training for A/RHD staff is needed to focus on the following areas:
o When and Why Advocate Child IR cases can/should be closed out.
o A more uniform approach to enforcement of Quirt Hours in the residence halls by
all A/RHD staffs and the Security staff. Currently there seems to be a wide
variety of how/when quiet hours are enforced in the residence halls, depending
upon that hall’s leadership.
With the elimination of the Odor of Marijuana as a policy violation, being make a non-
conduct policy violation, more effort will need to be made to provide the A/RHD staff
with educational tools to approach the issue of odor.
o One key approach will be to more effectively take advantage of the Decision
making and Ethics Workshop that was introduced this past spring semester.
o This new change in policy will be highlighted during A/RHD and RA training
with the hall staff.
23
Fall 2012
Overview and Statistics
24
Overview of Fall 2012 Information
Listed below are Security stats at a glance for the fall 2012 semester. For comparison purposes a
summary of similar stats are shared from the previous fall 2011 semester.
Key Security Facts for Fall 2012
Security Aides responded to a total of 1,042 incidents
534 of the 1,042 incidents were for noise complaints
Security Aides completed 292 escorts
In Comparison – Fall 2011
Security Aides responded to a total of 1,533 incidents
934 of the 1,533 incidents were for noise complaints
Security Aides completed 251 escorts
The total number of incidents that Security responded to saw a decrease of about 32% and the
number of escorts increased by about 16%, the number of noise complaints Security Aides
responded to subsequently decreased by about 43% from the previous year.
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day
The chart below illustrates the 1,042 incidents that Security responded to by hour and day for the
fall semester. Thursday night continues to be the busiest and most active nights on campus.
Fall 2012 Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 4 6 9 6 6 7 15 53
9:00 - 10:00 16 13 8 17 30 25 44 153
10:00 - 11:00 16 15 13 7 45 16 52 164
11:00 - 12:00 17 14 17 15 38 22 40 163
12:00 - 1:00 28 17 18 17 26 20 21 147
1:00 - 2:00 17 15 18 26 28 20 37 161
2:00 - 3:00 17 14 13 9 22 26 44 145
3:00 - 4:00 4 4 4 3 14 8 19 56
TOTAL 119 98 100 100 209 144 272 1,042
25
The following charts are a breakdown of the semester incidents by each month of the semester.
August Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 7 9:00 - 10:00 3 1 1 1 5 11 5 27 10:00 - 11:00 4 5 2 0 7 4 5 27 11:00 - 12:00 3 1 0 4 1 3 6 18 12:00 - 1:00 4 1 2 2 1 2 4 16 1:00 - 2:00 1 1 3 1 0 3 1 10 2:00 - 3:00 0 4 0 0 2 9 3 18 3:00 - 4:00 1 1 0 0 3 1 1 7 TOTAL 17 14 10 9 19 35 26 130
September
Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 0 4 0 1 3 2 1 11 9:00 - 10:00 3 4 3 5 7 5 16 43 10:00 - 11:00 2 0 2 4 18 5 16 47 11:00 - 12:00 3 4 5 4 6 9 7 38 12:00 - 1:00 5 6 5 4 5 4 5 34 1:00 - 2:00 4 4 2 4 12 6 11 43 2:00 - 3:00 6 5 4 5 8 7 16 51 3:00 - 4:00 2 2 2 0 4 3 7 20 TOTAL 25 29 23 27 63 41 79 287
October Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 1 2 5 2 0 2 11 23 9:00 - 10:00 8 6 3 2 4 4 17 44 10:00 - 11:00 4 5 2 2 8 5 15 41 11:00 - 12:00 3 7 8 2 9 3 15 47 12:00 - 1:00 7 6 10 3 10 4 9 49 1:00 - 2:00 8 6 6 6 4 7 13 50 2:00 - 3:00 2 2 5 0 8 7 12 36 3:00 - 4:00 0 0 2 2 3 1 4 12 TOTAL 33 34 41 19 46 33 96 302
26
November Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 2 0 0 1 3 1 2 9 9:00 - 10:00 1 2 1 7 9 3 2 25 10:00 - 11:00 4 4 5 1 8 1 9 32 11:00 - 12:00 5 1 3 4 17 6 6 42 12:00 - 1:00 9 3 1 6 7 7 1 34 1:00 - 2:00 2 4 6 8 7 4 9 40 2:00 - 3:00 4 3 3 2 3 3 9 27 3:00 - 4:00 1 1 0 1 4 3 5 15 TOTAL 28 18 19 30 58 28 43 224
December Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 9:00 - 10:00 1 0 0 2 5 2 4 14 10:00 - 11:00 2 1 2 0 4 1 7 17 11:00 - 12:00 3 1 1 1 5 1 6 18 12:00 - 1:00 3 1 0 2 3 3 2 14 1:00 - 2:00 2 0 1 7 5 0 3 18 2:00 - 3:00 5 0 1 2 1 0 4 13 3:00 - 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 TOTAL 16 3 7 15 23 7 28 99
Residence Hall Fire Alarms
During the fall 2012 semester there were 84 fire alarms that occurred in the residence halls that
resulted in the fire department being dispatched to the residence halls. Cooking was the #1 cause
of the fire alarms. McDowell Hall had the highest number of fire alarms. This is down from the
previous fall semester in which there were 107 fire alarms in the residence halls.
Fire Safety Room Inspections
Due to the large number of fire safety violations being found during Winter and Spring closings
during 2011-2012, the Department of Residence Services implemented a new Fire Safety Room
Inspection process of all resident’s rooms in the first few weeks of the fall semester in order to
identify and educate residents regarding these potential fire safety hazards before the end of the
semester. It is hoped that this will also dramatically reduce the number of violations being found
27
during the Winter and Spring Break Closings. Below is a listing of how many fire safety
violations were found in each hall during Fire safety Inspections in mid-September.
Tri Towers Rotunda Guest Registration
Summary
In the fall 2012 semester there were a total of 364 students who registered a total of 442 guests.
Of the 442 guests, 51 were from out-of-state. These out-of-state quests were from 10 different
states, the District of Columbia and one from Canada with an overwhelming number (28)
coming from PA. By comparison, in fall 2011 there were 435 student hosts with 520 registered
guests, of which 91 were from out-of-state.
There were 23 residence halls with at least one registered host and guest this semester. Allyn
and Prentice were the only two halls in which no residents registered any guests. Not
surprisingly, the halls with the most number of registered hosts and guests were the three halls in
Tri-Towers. Koonce had the most with 102 hosts and 118 guests followed by Wright with 98
hosts and 119 guests and then Leebrick with 39 hosts and 45 guests.
All signed guest registration forms for the semester are stored in the Security Office and are in
alphabetical order (by the host’s last name) and are separated by week. These forms will remain
in the Security Office for at least one full semester after the conclusion of the semester in which
they were issued.
Hall Name 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor 5th Floor 6th Floor 7th Floor 8th Floor 9th Floor 10th Floor 11th Floor 12th Floor Total
Leebrick 6 4 1 4 1 3 19
Korb 1 7 7 15
Koonce 1 3 5 5 8 9 9 2 5 3 50
Wright 5 14 29 28 33 14 16 2 141
Lake 7 27 16 50
Olson 1 7 25 17 50
Allyn 6 18 21 7 52
Clark 2 16 18 8 44
Manchester 12 4 16
Fletcher 2 6 8
CCA 1 17 4 13 35
CCB 1 10 7 1 19
CCC 3 6 3 13 25
CCD 4 4 13 5 26
CCE 10 6 16 3 35
CCF 11 14 17 7 49
Beall 2 4 8 9 10 11 9 7 60
McDowell 2 7 11 12 10 12 11 12 77
Dunbar MIA MIA MIA ?
Prentice 1 2 3
Verder 5 20 12 37
Engleman 3 2 2 7
Stopher 4 12 3 19
Johnson 5 8 13
TOTAL 850
28
Number of Hosts & Guests Per Hall in Fall 2012
Hall # Hosts # Guests
ALL 0 0
BEA 3 3
CCA 15 22
CCB 11 12
CCC 4 4
CCD 7 10
CCE 18 27
CCF 12 14
CLA 2 3
DUN 6 6
ENG 3 3
FLE 4 5
JOH 3 3
KOO 102 118
KOR 15 18
LAK 3 3
LEE 39 45
MAN 4 6
MCD 1 1
OLS 8 12
PRE 0 0
STO 3 4
VAN 1 1
VER 2 3
WRI 98 119
TOTAL 364 442
Centralized Discipline Overview
Each RHD was assigned generally between 142 – 147 conduct Child Incident Report cases in
Advocate during the fall 2012 semester for a total of 1,728 Child IR’s being assigned. This
represents a nearly 10% increase in the number of cases from the previous fall 2011 semester in
which there were 1,570 cases assigned.
These numbers do not reflect non-conduct type of cases (i.e., flu-like, vandalism, psychological,
EMS, roommate issue/concerns, etc.) nor do they reflect the Winter Break Closing cases that
were inputted into Advocate during and after Winter Break.
29
Hall Allyn/Clark 147
Beall/McDowell/VanCampen 146
CCA/CCB 142
CCC/CCD 95
CCE/CCF 143
Dunbar/Prentice 145
Fletcher/Manchester 145
Johnson/Stopher 146
Koonce 144
Lake/Olson 144
Leebrick/Korb 144
Verder/Engleman 41
Wright 146
TOTAL 1,728
Winter Break Closing Violations
Before hall staff left for Winter Break they inspected residence hall rooms for closing and fire
safety violations, as well as KSU Fire Prevention did during the break period, resulting in a total
of 1,009 Parent IR’s and 1,866 Child IR’s for Winter Break Closing Violations. This is
down slightly from last year in which there were 1,152 Parent IR’s and 1,993 Child IR’s.
There were primarily two violations, Residence Hall Policies (i.e., closing violations) and
General Safety (i.e., fire safety violations) for these Winter Break Closing violations.
Violation Parent IR’s Child IR’s Residence Hall Policies 176 312
General Safety 887 1,657
These totals are listed on the chart on the next page for each residence hall.
Hall Parent IR Child IR
Allyn 30 59
Beall 87 157
CCA 13 26
CCB 23 42
CCC 22 26
30
CCD 10 22
CCE 33 75
CCF 16 35
Clark 33 63
Dunbar 51 90
Engleman 4 7
Fletcher 21 40
Johnson 50 99
Koonce 63 122
Korb 36 71
Lake 46 84
Leebrick 47 47
Manchester 22 41
McDowell 83 152
Olson 56 106
Prentice 101 188
Stopher 17 35
VanCampen 4 10
Verder 42 80
Wright 99 189
Alcohol Incidents Called Into Security
In the fall 2012 semester there were 95 incidents involving alcohol (that met our Department’s
definition of a “party”) that were called into Security that required the Assistant Director and/or
Assistant Security Manager to respond to. This resulted in 511 people being documented for an
alcohol policy violation. The KSUPD were called to 46 (48.5%) of these incidents and they
cited 91 (18%) of the individuals. However, the KSUPD were unable to respond to 5 (11%) of
the 46 times they were called; four of those five times occurred on Halloween.
31
These figures show mixed results from the previous fall semester.
The total number of “alcohol parties” was up a little more than 4% (91 to 95) from fall
2011.
The number of people documented was up almost 2% (499 to 511) from fall 2011.
The number of times KSU PD was called was down almost 20% (57 to 46) from fall
2011.
The number of people cited by KSU PD was down almost 11% (102 to 91) from fall
2011.
These alcohol incidents occurred during the following days of the week:
Sunday (6); Monday (1); Tuesday (1); Wednesday (2); Thursday (25); Friday (14), and
Saturday (46).
The chart on the next page represents the total number of alcohol Parent and Child Incident
Reports per hall during the fall 2012 semester and compares the data to the previous fall 2011
semester. It reveals that there was an 18% increase in number of alcohol incidents in fall 2012
resulting in 15% more people being documented that in fall 2011.
Fall 2011 v 2012 Alcohol Incidents per Hall
Hall ‘11 Parent IR's
‘11 Child IR's
‘12 Parent IR's
‘12 Child IR's
Allerton 0 0 3 5
Allyn 4 27 8 31
Beall 13 69 18 65
CCA 10 52 11 39
CCB 4 18 7 44
CCC 2 10 1 2
CCD 5 21 5 27
CCE 4 18 11 41
CCF 3 13 8 32
Clark 6 22 8 36
Dunbar 5 21 7 19
Engleman 2 13 4 20
Fletcher 3 7 7 25
Johnson 1 1 2 6
Koonce 19 62 13 44
Korb 10 26 6 16
Lake 9 28 13 51
32
Leebrick 5 20 1 3
Manchester 4 7 7 36
McDowell 4 39 14 60
Olson 3 6 2 7
Prentice 15 69 4 23
Stopher 2 3 1 5
Van Campen 1 3 1 5
Verder 9 20 4 14
Wright 7 26 11 38
TOTAL 150 601 177 692
% CHANGE 18% 15%
CCE and McDowell saw a sizable increase in the number of alcohol incidents in their halls while
Leebrick, Prentice and Verder saw a sizable decrease in alcohol incidents.
In CCE:
o 36 % of the incidents occurred on Halloween
o 18% of the incidents occurred in one room
o 36% of the incidents occurred on the 4th
floor
In McDowell Hall:
o 28% of the incidents occurred on Halloween
o 28% of the incidents occurred on the 4th
floor
o 50% of the incidents were confined to two floors (4th
& 6th
)
It’s also interesting to point out that from fall 2012 to fall 2012 Stopher and Verder Halls saw
huge decreases over the two year span. Stopher went from 28 students documented in fall
2012 down to just three students documented this past fall. Verder went from 15 incidents
involving 51 people down to just four incidents involving 14 people this past fall.
Odor of Marijuana & Controlled Substances Stats
The chart below represents the total number of controlled substance and odor of marijuana policy
violations that were documented in the residence halls in the fall semester.
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
% Change from '11
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Odor of Marijuana 122 266
150 345
23% 30% Controlled Substances 43 102
51 129
19% 26%
33
The following chart lists a comparison of the number of Odor of Marijuana incidents that
occurred in the residence halls from fall 2011 to fall 2012. There were four residence halls
(Beall, CCF, Dunbar and Lake) that saw a significant increase in the number of odor of
marijuana incidents in their halls while Olson saw a significant decrease in the number of odor
of marijuana incidents in their hall.
In Beall Hall:
o 29% of incidents occurred in one room
o 57% of the incidents were confined to just three rooms
In CCF:
o 50% of the incidents occurred in just one room
In Dunbar Hall:
o 25% of the incidents occurred in just one room
o 44% of the incidents were confined to just two rooms
In Lake Hall:
o 61% of the incidents were confined to just five rooms
o Four rooms were documented twice and one room was documented three times
In Olson Hall:
o The two incidents that occurred, both occurred in the same room
Fall '11 v '12 Odor of Marijuana Incidents
Hall ‘11 Parent IR's
‘11 Child IR's
‘12 Parent IR's
‘12 Child IR's
Allerton 0 0 0 0
Allyn 11 30 5 11
Beall 4 8 14 28
CCA 2 6 3 10
CCB 3 4 1 1
CCC 0 0 0 0
CCD 3 9 1 4
CCE 2 13 4 18
CCF 0 0 6 24
Clark 7 12 12 27
Dunbar 6 12 16 39
Engleman 1 1 1 5
Fletcher 4 7 4 10
Johnson 0 0 0 0
Koonce 12 24 14 28
Korb 4 8 8 15
Lake 8 18 18 40
34
Leebrick 3 5 6 7
Manchester 3 6 2 3
McDowell 1 1 4 10
Olson 17 33 2 2
Prentice 11 32 10 17
Stopher 0 0 1 4
Van Campen 0 0 0 0
Verder 10 19 7 15
Wright 10 18 11 27
TOTAL 122 266 150 345
% Change 23% 30%
The following chart represents the total number of incidents that occurred in each residence
hall this past semester compared to the previous fall semester.
Fall 2011 vs. 2012 Total Number of Conduct Incidents per Hall Hall ‘11 Parent IR's ‘11 Child IR's ‘12 Parent IR's ‘12 Child IR's
Allerton 0 0 3 5
Allyn 35 98 48 164
Beall 27 87 40 110
CCA 21 78 21 69
CCB 12 36 14 59
CCC 10 19 4 5
CCD 24 60 15 46
CCE 13 48 22 66
CCF 8 23 20 65
Clark 39 94 48 139
Dunbar 29 75 30 68
Engleman 6 23 5 25
Fletcher 32 58 20 51
Johnson 6 11 7 29
Koonce 108 245 86 225
Korb 63 109 31 61
Lake 51 110 52 145
Leebrick 29 57 21 29
Manchester 37 75 30 88
35
McDowell 20 62 25 83
Olson 39 75 14 22
Prentice 35 133 36 79
Stopher 19 22 4 11
VanCampen 8 17 1 5
Verder 45 89 17 35
Wright 115 231 60 164
TOTAL 831 1,915 674 1,848
% Change -19% -3%
Koonce Hall had the most activity with 86 incidents involving 225 people being documented.
Wright Hall had the second most activity with 60 incidents involving 164 people being
documented. Ally Hall also had 164 people documented, but with only 48 incidents. Not
surprisingly, VanCampen saw the least amount of activity with one incident resulting in five
people being documented.
Fall 2012 Conduct Child IR Totals
Conduct Incident Total
Escort 73
Odor of Marijuana 345
Misuse of University Keys 191
Sexual Misconduct 2
Alcohol 692
Improper Room Change 4
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 743
Animals 4
Restroom 35
Room Capacity 97
Visitation 54
Complicity 16
Controlled Substances 129
Destruction/Misuse of Property
87
Disorderly Conduct 85
General Safety 92
Harassment 16
Laws 5
Misrepresentation 28
Physical Violence 19
36
Reasonable Request 100
Residence Hall Policies 19
Smoking 61
Theft 26
Illegal Appliances 8
Student Conduct Process 1
University Grounds 1
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 7
University Rules 1
Weapons 9
Fall 2012 Non-Conduct Child IR Totals
Non-Conduct Incident Total
Damage 6
EMS 42
Facilities Issues/Concerns/Problem 11
General Issue/Concern 69
Illness/Injury 17
Mental Health Issue/Concern 32
Parent Issue/Concern 8
Room Entry 2
Roommate Issue/Conflict 27
Vandalism/Graffiti 76
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts
eCHECKUP (Online Alcohol Workshop):
247 students completed the survey, while 216 of those students verified that they had completed
the survey. The survey is live and online and can be completed by anyone, which is why there
may be more students taking the survey than are being assigned to do so.
Demographic information of those who completed eCHECKUP:
Males: 37% Females: 63%
Greek: 9% Non-Greek: 91%
Athletes: 8% Non-Athletes: 92%
37
Students spent on average about $11.47 per week on alcohol
On average the highest BAC in a typical week for students was 0.10
On the median, students drank about 12 beers per month
Additional Information:
For 197 of the students assigned eCHECKUP, this was their first alcohol violation.
19 students had an alcohol policy violation prior to the start of the spring 2012 semester.
After being assigned eCHECKUP…
o 23 students were found in violation of the alcohol policy one more time
o No student was found in violation of alcohol policy two more times
The recidivism rate was about 10% for those students assigned to eCHECKUP
Parental Notification Letters (PNL):
The Department of Residence Services notifies the parents/guardians of residence hall students
under the age of 21 if their student is found to be in violation of the residence hall alcohol
policies and who has not been cited by the police or referred to the Office of Student Conduct.
A/RHD’s notify their supervisor when a student is documented and found responsible for
violation of the alcohol policy and the Assistant Director for each area sends these letters to the
students’ permanent addresses.
During the fall semester 226 students were issued Parental Notification Letters (129 from Josette
and 97 from Kim). This is a 75% increase from the previous fall semester in which 129 students
were issues PNL’s.
Community Billing:
All floor/community residents can collectively be held responsible for damages to public areas
that cannot be attributed to specific individuals.
The fall semester saw community billing from only one area (Josette’s area) for a total of
$2,258.18 in damages being billed.
Johnson Hall – 1st floor residents billed for $86.50 (missing fire extinguisher)
Olson Hall –2nd
floor male residents billed for $200 (hole punched in wall)
Lake Hall – 3rd
floor residents billed for $458.18 (water fountain replacement)
Lake Hall – 4th
floor residents billed for $650 (room door replacement)
Dunbar Hall – Male residents billed for $863.50 (missing room number plates)
38
Psychological Referral Letters:
The Department of Residence Services will issue a student who has experienced a psychological
crisis a letter mandating they be evaluated by the university’s Psychological Services Office
before they can be cleared to remain in on-campus housing. During the fall semester there were
20 students issued a Psychological Referral Letter. The previous fall semester there were 21
Psychological Referral Letters issued.
15 were from the Tri/Twin/Eastway area and five were from the Quad/NF/CC’s area.
Listing of All Residence Services Sanctions Issued to Students in Fall 2012:
Residence Services Sanction Number
RS - Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO Program 244
RS - Behavioral Contract 10
RS - Decision Making and Ethics Workshop 2
RS - Letter of Warning 694
RS - No Sanction Issued 2
RS - Parent/Guardian Notification Letter 243
RS - Reflection Paper - Other 52
RS - Reflection Paper on ALCOHOL USE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 12
RS - Reflection Paper on DECISION MAKING 24
RS - Reflection Paper on DRUG USE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 3
RS - Reflection Paper on LEGAL AND PROFESSIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF DRUG USE 6
RS - Reflection Paper on RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS 21
RS - Reflection Project 17
RS - Reflection Questions for use with eCHECKUP TO GO PROGRAM 75
RS - Restitution for Damages 12
RS- Community Service 16
RS-Other 61
39
Spring 2013
Overview and Statistics
40
Overview of Spring 2013 Information
Listed below are Security stats at a glance for the spring 2013 semester. For comparison
purposes a summary of similar stats are shared from the previous spring 2012 semester.
Key Security Facts for Spring 2013
Security Aides responded to a total of 902 incidents
493 of the 902 incidents were for noise complaints
Security Aides completed 166 escorts
In Comparison – Spring 2012
Security Aides responded to a total of 1,384 incidents
747 of the 1,384 incidents were for noise complaints
Security Aides completed 135 escorts
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day
The charts below illustrate the 1,384 incidents that Security responded to by hour and day each
month during the spring 2012 semester. The busiest nights continue to be Thursday nights.
January Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00
0 1 2 2 0 4 3 12
9:00 - 10:00
3 2 4 4 4 1 5 23
10:00 - 11:00
3 2 5 7 6 4 9 36
11:00 - 12:00
1 3 5 3 5 0 9 26
12:00 - 1:00
5 4 6 4 5 3 10 37
1:00 - 2:00
2 3 5 4 4 5 10 33
2:00 - 3:00
1 1 4 1 5 6 9 27
3:00 - 4:00
1 0 0 0 2 6 2 11
TOTAL
16 16 31 25 31 29 57 205
41
February
Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00
0 0 0 2 0 1 2 5
9:00 - 10:00
3 1 3 3 7 3 4 24
10:00 - 11:00
3 4 4 5 13 2 6 37
11:00 - 12:00
7 5 5 4 10 5 2 38
12:00 - 1:00
2 1 4 5 6 4 4 26
1:00 - 2:00
3 3 6 8 10 2 3 35
2:00 - 3:00
2 2 5 3 8 8 2 30
3:00 - 4:00
0 1 1 2 2 4 5 15
TOTAL
20 17 28 32 56 29 28 210
March Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00
0 2 3 0 0 1 5 11
9:00 - 10:00
4 2 4 2 4 2 7 25
10:00 - 11:00
4 1 3 2 7 4 7 28
11:00 - 12:00
3 4 5 5 8 10 3 38
12:00 - 1:00
5 1 3 8 5 2 2 26
1:00 - 2:00
3 2 4 1 10 5 2 27
2:00 - 3:00
3 2 3 3 6 0 4 21
3:00 - 4:00
0 0 0 0 1 1 2 4
TOTAL
22 14 25 21 41 25 32 180
42
April Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00
2 0 1 0 2 0 2 7
9:00 - 10:00
6 3 2 6 12 5 7 41
10:00 - 11:00
5 0 4 3 15 3 7 37
11:00 - 12:00
8 6 6 2 17 2 10 51
12:00 - 1:00
3 5 4 4 7 4 5 32
1:00 - 2:00
6 6 3 5 10 1 8 39
2:00 - 3:00
2 2 2 3 9 1 15 34
3:00 - 4:00
3 0 1 0 7 0 3 14
TOTAL
35 22 23 23 79 16 57 255
May Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00
0 2 2 0 1 0 0 5
9:00 - 10:00
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
10:00 - 11:00
1 0 0 0 2 3 1 7
11:00 - 12:00
0 0 0 3 2 1 0 6
12:00 - 1:00
2 0 3 4 3 3 2 17
1:00 - 2:00
0 1 1 1 4 1 0 8
2:00 - 3:00
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3
3:00 - 4:00
1 0 1 1 0 1 1 5
TOTAL
5 3 8 10 12 9 5 52
43
Spring 2013
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 2 5 8 4 3 6 12 40
9:00 - 10:00 16 8 13 16 27 11 23 114
10:00 - 11:00 16 7 16 17 43 16 30 145
11:00 - 12:00 19 18 21 17 42 18 24 159
12:00 - 1:00 17 11 20 25 26 16 23 138
1:00 - 2:00 14 15 19 19 38 14 23 142
2:00 - 3:00 9 7 15 10 28 15 31 115
3:00 - 4:00 5 1 3 3 12 12 13 49
TOTAL 98 72 115 111 219 108 179 902
Residence Hall Fire Alarms
During the spring 2013 semester there were 66 fire alarms that occurred in the residence halls
that resulted in the fire department being dispatched to the residence halls. This is an increase
from the previous fall semester in which there were 59 fire alarms in the residence halls.
Tri Towers Rotunda Guest Registration
Summary
In the spring 2013 semester there were a total of 228 students who registered a total of 272
guests. Of the 272 guests, 35 were from out-of-state. These out-of-state quests were from nine
different states with a majority (17) coming from PA. By comparison, in spring 2012 there were
225 student hosts with 262 registered guests, of which 39 were from out-of-state.
44
Number of Hosts & Guests Per Hall in Spring 2013
Hall # Hosts # Guests
ALL 0 0
BEA 3 6
CCA 3 5
CCB 6 9
CCC 1 1
CCD 0 0
CCE 5 5
CCF 13 16
CLA 0 0
DUN 6 6
ENG 0 0
FLE 0 0
JOH 4 4
KOO 79 88
KOR 15 20
LAK 3 4
LEE 16 24
MAN 2 4
MCD 3 3
OLS 4 5
PRE 3 5
STO 0 0
VAN 0 0
VER 2 2
WRI 60 65
TOTAL 228 272
Centralized Discipline Overview
Each RHD was assigned between 90 – 94 conduct Child Incident Report cases (exception being
the CCC/D and VER/ENG RHD’s were assigned about 20% less cases at 64 each and the
BEA/MCD RHD being assigned 65 cases until her resignation) in Advocate during the spring
2013 semester for a total of 1,108 Child IR’s being assigned. This represents a nearly 29%
decrease in the number of cases from the previous spring 2012 semester in which there were
1,550 cases assigned and nearly a 20% decrease from spring 2011 in which there were only
1,380 cases assigned to RHD’s.
45
These numbers do not reflect non-conduct type of cases (i.e., flu-like, vandalism, psychological,
EMS, roommate issue/concerns, etc.) nor do they reflect the 745 Spring Break Closing cases that
were inputted into Advocate during Spring Break.
Hall Allyn/Clark 91
Beall/McDowell/VanCampen 65
CCA/CCB 91
CCC/CCD 64
CCE/CCF 94
Dunbar/Prentice 93
Fletcher/Manchester 93
Johnson/Stopher 90
Koonce 93
Lake/Olson 90
Leebrick/Korb 90
Verder/Engleman 64
Wright 90
TOTAL 1,108
Alcohol Incidents Called Into Security
In the spring 2013 semester there were 52 incidents involving alcohol (that met our Department’s
definition of a “party”) that were called into Security that required the Assistant Director,
Residential Safety & Security and/or the Assistant Security Manager to respond to. There were
276 people documented in these 52 incidents. The KSUPD were called for 19 (37%) of these
incidents. 44 people were issued citations by KSUPD for various alcohol offenses, though most
were for prohibitions charges.
These alcohol incidents occurred during the following days of the week in the spring 2013
semester:
Sunday (6); Monday (0); Tuesday (2); Wednesday (2); Thursday (14); Friday (17), and
Saturday (11)
46
Some point of interest regarding Alcohol incidents listed below:
CCB – 2/3 of the incidents occurred in one room
CCC – both incidents occurred in the same room
CCE – one room accounted for 33% of the incidents and 50% of students who were
documented
Clark Hall – 50% of the incidents occurred on the 3rd
floor with 50% of students being
documented on the 2nd
floor
Dunbar Hall – 80% of incidents occurred on the 2nd
floor
Fletcher Hall – 19 (54%) students were documented in just 2 incidents
Lake Hall – 50% of the incidents occurred on the 4th
floor
Olson Hall – 50% of the incidents occurred in the same room
Spring 2012 v. 2013 Alcohol Incidents per Hall
Hall Spring 12 Parent IR's
Spring 12 Child IR's
Spring 13 Parent IR's
Spring 13 Child IR's
Allerton 0 0 0 0
Allyn 14 48 5 25
Beall 5 19 8 36
CCA 6 23 6 28
CCB 5 26 3 16
CCC 1 4 2 3
CCD 4 13 0 0
CCE 6 15 6 17
CCF 1 1 7 30
Clark 8 37 8 27
Dunbar 4 17 5 15
Engleman 1 1 0 0
Fletcher 8 24 7 35
Johnson 0 0 0 0
Koonce 23 99 13 45
Korb 8 25 5 13
Lake 7 27 10 27
Leebrick 6 7 2 2
Manchester 10 40 6 13
McDowell 14 61 6 16
Olson 11 35 4 5
Prentice 5 22 5 13
Stopher 0 0 2 10
VanCampen 1 2 0 0
47
Verder 4 23 4 13
Wright 13 36 6 24
TOTAL 165 605 120 413
Percent Change -27% -32%
2013 Spring Break Closing Violations
Hall Parent IR # Child IR #
Allyn 15 30 Beall 32 54 CCA 20 38
Conduct Offense Types Child IR #
CCB 11 22
Alcohol 36
CCC 13 14
Animals 1
CCD 12 26
Destruction/Misues of Property 4
CCE 28 57
General Safety 651
CCF 21 47
Illegal Appliances 36
Clark 10 19
Misuse of Universty Keys 1
Dunbar 2 4
Odor of Marijuana 12
Engleman 1 4
Residence Hall Policies 72
Fletcher 7 12
Theft 8
Johnson 8 16
Weapons 2
Koonce 27 50 Korb 34 61 Lake 10 18 Leebrick 14 14 Manchester 5 10 McDowell 39 59 Olson 2 3 Prentice 4 11 Stopher 7 13 Van Campen 4 11 Verder 14 22 Wright 76 130 TOTAL 416 745
48
Odor of Marijuana & Controlled Substances Stats
The chart below represents the total number of controlled substance and odor of marijuana policy
violations that were documented in the residence halls in the fall semester.
Spring 2012
Spring 2013
% Change from '12
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Odor of Marijuana 147 319
143 328
-3% 3% Controlled Substances 37 83
41 86
11% 4%
The following chart lists a comparison of the number of Odor of Marijuana incidents that
occurred in the residence halls from spring 2012 to spring 2013. Some points of interest are:
Allyn Hall – 3 rooms accounted for 75% of all incidents
Beall Hall – 3 of the 8 incidents occurred on the 6th
floor
CCB – 5 of the 7 incidents occurred on the 1st floor, with 3 incidents occurring in room
102
Clark Hall – 2 rooms accounted for 75% of the incidents
Dunbar Hall – 7 (70%) of the incidents occurred on the 2nd
floor and 2 rooms accounted
for 50% of all incidents
Lake Hall – Room 101 was documented 3 times
Leebrick Hall – 50% of the incidents occurred on the 5th
floor
Manchester Hall – 8 (88%) of the incidents occurred on the 4th
floor, with 3 of the
incidents occurring in room 406
Spring '12 v '13 Odor of Marijuana Incidents
Hall ‘12 Parent IR's ‘12 Child IR's ‘13 Parent IR's ‘13 Child IR's
Allerton 0 0 0 0
Allyn 4 5 8 20
Beall 4 7 8 22
CCA 3 12 1 2
CCB 2 2 7 15
CCC 2 4 0 0
CCD 0 0 0 0
CCE 2 11 3 10
CCF 5 15 3 4
Clark 8 24 8 19
Dunbar 10 21 10 21
49
Engleman 0 0 2 8
Fletcher 5 10 5 13
Johnson 0 0 0 0
Koonce 10 18 25 55
Korb 0 0 3 9
Lake 12 27 16 35
Leebrick 11 15 6 7
Manchester 12 31 9 26
McDowell 4 5 5 8
Olson 13 34 2 3
Prentice 15 32 4 7
Stopher 0 0 0 0
Van Campen 0 0 1 4
Verder 6 15 3 5
Wright 19 31 14 35
TOTAL 147 319 143 328
% Change -3% 3%
The following chart represents the total number of incidents that occurred in each residence
hall this past semester and compared to the previous spring semester.
Spring 2012 vs. 2013 Total Number of Conduct Incidents per Hall
Hall Spring 12 Parent IR's
Spring 12 Child IR's
Spring 13 Parent IR's
Spring 13 Child IR's
Allerton 1 1 2 3
Allyn 41 93 43 109
Beall 16 42 47 104
CCA 74 157 40 95
CCB 60 138 33 76
CCC 66 72 40 51
CCD 59 125 43 103
CCE 52 111 43 97
CCF 59 136 42 103
Clark 53 135 38 84
Dunbar 23 61 27 54
Engleman 1 1 3 12
Fletcher 40 89 27 83
50
Johnson 4 9 7 14
Koonce 136 346 98 232
Korb 38 91 49 82
Lake 32 81 54 118
Leebrick 39 49 33 40
Manchester 63 140 36 94
McDowell 59 137 53 91
Olson 40 98 12 21
Prentice 40 97 41 63
Stopher 4 8 9 22
VanCampen 5 7 6 16
Verder 40 103 30 55
Wright 177 355 116 242
TOTAL 1,222 2,682 973 2,064
% Change -20% -23%
Spring 2013 Conduct Child IR Totals Escort 63
Odor of Marijuana 328
Illegal Appliance 37
Sexual Misconduct 2
Misuse of University Keys 57
Alcohol 415
Gambling 0
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 415
Animals 4
Restroom 35
Room Capacity 68
Visitation 81
Complicity 47
Controlled Substances 86
Destruction/Misuse of Property 53
Discrimination 2
Disorderly Conduct 100
General Safety 877
51
Harassment 34
Laws 3
Misrepresentation 14
Physical Violence 6
Reasonable Request 122
Smoking 29
Theft 22
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 7
University Rules 8
Weapons 6
Residence Hall Policies 83
Computer Misuse 3
Improper Room Change 5
Spring 2013 Non- Conduct Child IR Totals
Damage 8
EMS 22
Flu-Like Symptoms 22
Facilities Issues/Concerns/Problem 3
General Issue/Concern 71
Illness/Injury 15
Mental Health Issue/Concern 13
Missing Person 0
Parent Issue/Concern 1
Room Entry 4
Roommate Issue/Conflict 3
Vandalism/Graffiti 59
52
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts
eCHECKUP (Online Alcohol Workshop):
136 students completed the survey, while 123 of those students verified that they had completed
the survey. The survey is live and online and can be completed by anyone, which is why there
may be more students taking the survey than are being assigned to do so.
Demographic information of those who completed eCHECKUP:
Males: 45% Females: 55%
Greek: 15% Non-Greek: 85%
Athletes: 7% Non-Athletes: 93%
Students spent on average about $14.12 per week on alcohol
On average the highest BAC in a typical week for students was 0.13
On the median, students drank about 19 beers per month
Additional Information:
For 107 of the students assigned eCHECKUP, this was their first alcohol violation.
16 students had an alcohol policy violation prior to the start of the spring 2012 semester.
After being assigned eCHECKUP…
o 2 students were found in violation of the alcohol policy one more time
The recidivism rate was 2% for those students assigned to eCHECKUP
Parental Notification Letters (PNL):
During the spring semester 130 students were issued Parental Notification Letters (79 from
Josette and 51 from Kim).
Community Billing:
The spring semester saw four separate community billings for the Tri/TW/EW area for a total of
$1,528.11 and eight separate billings for the Quad/NF/CC area for a total of $1,872.72 for a
grand total of $3,400.83 for the spring semester.
Clark Hall – 3rd
floor residents billed for $82.16 in damages on February 20th
Allyn Hall – 4th
floor Male Wing billed for $300 in damages on April 30th
Allyn Hall – 4th
floor Male Wing billed for 135 in damages on April 30th
Allyn Hall – 3rd
floor residents billed for $1,010.95 in damages on May 3rd
Lake Hall – All residents billed for $1,016.38 in damages on January 4th
Johnson Hall – 1st floor residents billed for $86.50 in damages on January 4
th
Prentice Hall – All residents billed for $60 in damages on February 18th
53
CCB – 3rd
floor residents billed for $150 in damages on February 22nd
Prentice Hall – 2nd
floor men’s wing billed for $57.90 on April 3rd
Dunbar Hall – 3rd
floor men’s wing billed for $200 on April 4th
Prentice Hall – 2nd
floor men’s wing billed for $200 on April 17th
Lake Hall – 2nd
floor men’s wing billed for $101.94 on April 19th
Psychological Referral Letters:
During the spring semester there were 21 students issued a Psychological Referral Letter.
15 were from the Tri/Twin/Eastway area, four were from the Quad/NF/CC’s area and two were
from Allerton.
Decision Making and Ethical Workshop (OSC):
Four workshops were scheduled over the course of the spring semester. Eight, six, 13 and 12
students were assigned to each of the four workshops respectively for a total of 39 students being
assigned to attend. 10 (26%) students failed to show up for the workshops. Four (10%) of
students showed up, but were turned away because they had failed to complete the required
workbook prior to attending the workshop.
Listing of All Residence Services Sanctions Issued to Students in spring 2013:
Residence Services Sanction Number
RS - Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO 143
RS – Room/Hall Reassignment 0
RS – Community Service 4
RS - Letter of Warning 371
RS - No Sanction Issued 60
RS - Parent/Guardian Notification Letter 140
RS - Reflection Paper - Other 24
RS - Restitution for Damages 0
RS – Other 43
RS - Decision Making & Ethics Workshop 12
RS - Reflection Paper on Alcohol Use Among College Students 3
RS - Reflection Paper on Decision Making 20
RS - Reflection Paper on Legal & Professional Consequences of Drug Use 12
RS - Reflection Paper on Responsibilities of Community Members 27
RS - Reflection Project 5
RS - Reflection Questions for Use with eCHECKUP TO GO Program 69
1
Department of Residence Services Disciplinary Statistics
AY 2013/2014
A Compilation of Reports Related to
Department Disciplinary Statistics and Security Operations
Compiled by Brian C. Hellwig,
Assistant Director for Residential Safety & Security
June 2014
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview and Statistics: 2013 - 2014 5
Key Security Facts for AY 13/14 5
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day 5
Tri Towers Guest Registration 6
Alcohol Incidents Called into Security 6
Centralized Discipline Overview 7
Fire Safety Room Inspections 8
Residence Hall Fire Alarms 8
Winter Break Closing Violation Information 8
Spring Break Closing Violation Information 9
Non-Conduct AY Child IR Totals in Advocate 10
Conduct AY Child IR Totals in Advocate 11
Interesting Alcohol Facts for AY 13/14 11
Number of Child IR’s Per Person 12
Five-Year Comparison of Select Policy Violations 13
Odor of Marijuana Incidents per Hall 13
Alcohol Incidents per Hall 14
Total Conduct Incidents per Hall 15
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts 16
Student Conduct Referrals 16
Alcohol eCHECKUP (Online Alcohol Workshop) 16
Marijuana eCHECKUP (Online Marijuana Workshop) 17
Parental Notification 17
3
Community Billing 18
Psychological Referral Letters 18
Ethical Decision Making Initiatives 18
All Residence Services Sanctions Issued to Students 19
Student Conduct Revenue 19
KSUPD Vandalism Calls to Residence Halls 20
Policy Recommendations for 2014-2015 21
Fall 2013 Overview and Statistics 23
Key Security Facts for Fall 2013 24
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day 24
Residence Hall Fire Alarms 26
Fire Safety Room Inspections 27
Tri Towers Rotunda Guest Registration 27
Centralized Discipline Overview – Fall 2013 29
Winter Break Closing Violations 29
Alcohol Incidents Called Into Security 30
Fall 2012 vs. 2013 Alcohol Incidents per Hall 30
Fall 2012 vs. 2013 Odor of Marijuana Incidents per Hall 31
Fall 2013 Controlled Substance Incidents 34
Fall 2012 vs. 2013 Total # of Conduct Incidents per Hall 35
Fall 2013 Conduct Child IR Totals 36
What Incidents Occurred in Each Hall in Fall 2013 36
Fall 2013 Non-Conduct Child IR Totals 45
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts for Fall 46
Residence Services Sanctions Issued in Fall 2013 48
4
Spring 2014 Overview and Statistics 49
Key Security Facts for Spring 2014 50
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day 50
Residence Hall Fire Alarms 53
Tri Towers Guest Registration 53
Centralized Discipline Overview – Spring 2014 54
Alcohol Incidents Called into Security 55
Spring 2013 vs. 2014 Alcohol Incidents per Hall 56
2014 Spring Break Closing Violations 57
Spring 2013 vs. 2014 Odor of Marijuana Incidents per Hall 58
Spring 2014 Controlled Substance Violations 59
Spring 2013 vs. 2014 Total # of Conduct Incidents per Hall 60
Spring 2014 Conduct Child IR Totals 61
What Incidents Occurred in Each Hall in Spring 2014 62
Spring 2014 Non-Conduct Child IR Totals 71
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts for Spring 72
5
Overview of AY 13/14 Information
Listed below are Security stats at a glance for the AY 13/14. For comparison purposes a
summary of similar stats are shared from the previous academic year.
Key Security Facts for AY 13/14
Security Aides responded to a total of 1,639 incidents
736 (45%) out of the 1,639 incidents were for noise complaints
o The remaining 55% of incidents responded to included everything from EMS
calls, alcohol incidents (though many alcohol incidents start out first as a noise
issue), fire alarms, domestic disputes, controlled substance issues, etc.
Security Aides completed 458 escorts
By Comparison – AY 12/13
Security Aides responded to a total of 1,944 incidents
1,027 (53%) out of the 1,944 incidents were for noise complaints
Security Aides completed 458 escorts
The number of incidents Security staff responded decreased by 33% from the previous year.
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day
The chart below illustrates the 1,639 incidents that Security responded to by hour and day for the
entire academic year. Thursday nights continue to be the busiest and most active nights on
campus.
AY 13/14 Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 10 9 10 12 22 11 34 108
9:00 - 10:00 31 33 31 18 76 47 53 289
10:00 - 11:00 22 24 17 20 77 30 68 258
11:00 - 12:00 29 31 27 29 69 50 54 289
12:00 - 1:00 34 42 22 22 41 29 35 225
1:00 - 2:00 12 25 19 20 51 34 37 198
2:00 - 3:00 12 23 20 12 44 23 55 189
3:00 - 4:00 7 7 7 4 17 12 29 83
TOTAL
157 194 153 137 397 236 365 1639
6
Tri-Towers Rotunda Guest Registration
Overview of Policy
Between the hours of 12:00 am – 4:00 am during the mornings of Friday, Saturday and Sunday
the Tri Towers Rotunda is restricted access to only KSU students who show their KSU ID and to
registered guests of residential students who are issued a wrist band. Only residential KSU
students are permitted to register up to two guests per weekend. Residential students must
register with their guest in person at the Tri Towers Desk between the hours of 8:00 am – 10:00
pm. Registered guests are issued a colored wrist band (with the color changing randomly each
week) listing their and their host’s information which they must wear - and show - in order to
gain entry into the Tri Rotunda during the restricted hours and also be accompanied by their host
at the time of entry. There are security personnel stationed at each of the four entrances leading
into the Tri Rotunda to enforce this policy during the restricted hours each weekend.
Summary
During this academic year there were 564 students who registered 676 guests. Of the 676 guests,
92 (14%) were from out-of-state. 56 (61%) of the 92 out-of-state guests came from
Pennsylvania. By comparison, in AY 2012-2013 there were 592 students who registered 714
guests, of which 86 guests were from out-of-state.
All signed guest registration forms for each semester are stored in the Security Office and are in
alphabetical order (by the host’s last name) and are separated by week. These forms will remain
in the Security Office for at least one full year after the conclusion of the semester in which they
were issued.
Alcohol Incidents Called Into Security
In the 2013-2014 academic year there were 128 incidents (down 13% from the previous year of
147 incidents) involving alcohol (that met our Department’s definition of a “party”) that were
called into Security that required the Assistant Director for Safety & Security and/or Coordinator
for Safety & Security to respond to. There were 750 people documented in these 128 incidents.
The KSUPD were called for 59 (47%) of these incidents. 158 (21%) people were issued
citations by KSUPD for various alcohol offenses, though most were for prohibitions charges.
This represents an increase of about 17% in the number of people that were cited by police from
the previous year in which 135 people were issued citations.
These alcohol incidents occurred during the following days of the week:
Sunday (9); Monday (3); Tuesday (3); Wednesday (0); Thursday (30); Friday (19), and
Saturday (64).
7
Centralized Discipline Overview
This was the fifth year in which the centralized discipline process has been used whereby all
incident reports written by student and professional staff members are first reviewed by one of
two people (Assistant Director, Safety & Security or Coordinator, Safety & Security) who
review them and then distributes them out among the RHD staff. The goal and purpose of this
new process was to 1) more equally distribute the discipline workload among the RHD staff and
2) help to ensure that individual sanctions are more consistent among all the students involved in
the one incident.
Each RHD was assigned an average of 230 conduct Child Incident Report cases in Advocate
during the 2013-2014 academic year, with a total of 2,874 cases being assigned. These 2,874
cases represent about a 1% increase in the number of cases assigned to RHD’s from the previous
year in which there were 2,836.
These numbers do not reflect non-conduct type of cases (i.e., flu-like, vandalism, psychological,
EMS, roommate issue/concerns, etc.) nor do they reflect the 600 Winter Break Closing and 296
Spring Break Closing cases that were inputted into Advocate.
Kim’s Area (Tri, Twin, Eastway, Van Campen):
Fall Spring AY Total
Twin/VanCampen 151 88 239
Wright 154 89 243
Leebrick/Korb 159 90 249
Allyn/Clark 155 86 241
Fletcher/Manchester 158 93 251
Koonce 158 83 241
TOTAL 935 529 1,464
Josette’s Area (Quad, New Front, Centennials):
Fall Spring AY Total
Lake/Olson 155 81 236
Verder/Engleman 50 68 118
Dunbar/Prentice 153 87 240
8
Stopher/Johnson 91 80 171
CCA/CCB 153 80 233
CCC/CCD 116 62 178
CCE/CCF 154 80 234
TOTAL 872 538 1,410
GRAND TOTAL 2,874 Child Incident Report Cases
(Does not include Winter and Spring Break Closing violations)
Fire Safety Room Inspections
This was the second year in which the Department of Residence Services implemented a Fire
Safety Room Inspection process of all resident’s rooms in the first few weeks of the fall semester
in order to identify and educate residents regarding these potential fire safety hazards before the
end of the semester. It is hoped that this will also dramatically reduce the number of violations
being found during the Winter and Spring Break Closings. There were 765 rooms documented
for mostly fire safety violations during the Fire Safety Room Inspection process, which occurred
during the 3rd
and 4th
week of the fall semester.
Our departmental goal was then to see a 30% reduction in the overall number of rooms being
documented over Winter Break. Over the Winter Break there were 468 rooms documented for
Fire Safety/General Safety violations resulting in a reduction rate of 38.8%.
It is very promising that we saw such a large reduction – even surpassing our original goal – in
number of rooms documented at Winter Break.
Residence Hall Fire Alarms
During the AY 2013-2014 there were 126 fire alarms that occurred in the residence halls that
resulted in the fire department being dispatched to the residence halls. This is down from the
previous AY 2012-2013 in which there were 150 fire alarms in the residence halls.
Winter Break Closing Violation Information
Students found in violation of a policy violation during Winter Break and Spring Break room
checks are contacted by the RHD of the hall where they live upon their return to campus. In
most cases (general safety violations) the RHD will issue a Letter of Warning to the student
requesting that the safety violation be corrected and then hall staff follow up to make sure the
item is removed (if applicable) or violation remedied. If it is a different type of policy violation
(i.e., alcohol) then the RHD will meet with the student(s) involved for a disciplinary meeting. In
either case, such violations are inputted into the Advocate database.
9
Winter Break Conduct and Non-Conduct Child IR Totals
Conduct Offense Type
Alcohol 31
Escort 11
Destruction/Misuse University Property 15
General Safety 857
Illegal Appliance 16
Theft 1
Misrepresentation 1
Residence Hall Policies 253
Controlled Substances 3
Misuse of University Keys 2
Reasonable Request 3
University Rules 1
Non-Conduct Offense Type
Facilities Issues/Concerns/Problems 6
General Issue/Concern 165
Odor of Marijuana 2
NOTE: The vast majority of Winter Break Policy Violations revolved around fire safety types of issues
(i.e., excessive strands of lights, posters and tapestry on the ceiling, excessive and/or improper use of
extension cords, etc.).
Spring Break Closing Violation Information
Spring Break Conduct and Non-Conduct Child IR Totals
Conduct Offense Type
Alcohol 16
Restroom 7
Destruction/Misuse of Property 17
General Safety 475
Reasonable Request 3
Residence Hall Policies 15
Residence Hall Policies – Illegal Appliance(s) 49
Visitation 2
Disorderly Conduct 2
Controlled Substances 3
Misuse of University Keys 4
Computer Misuse 1
10
Non-Conduct Offense Type
General Issue/Concern 17
Room Entry 8
Damage 2
Facilities Issues/Concerns/Problems 2
Illness/Injury 1
Odor of Marijuana 4
Vandalism/Graffiti 6
NOTE: Similar to Winter Break violations, the vast majority of issues revolved around fire safety issues.
Non-Conduct 2013-2014 Academic Year Child IR Totals in Advocate
AY 13-14 Non- Conduct Child IR Totals
Damage 13
Early Alert Notice 1
EMS 79
Facilities Issues/Concerns/Problem 41
General Issues/Concerns 294
Flu-Like Symptoms 1
Illness/Injury 38
Mental Health Issue/Concern 47
Emergency Room Change 2
Parent Issue/Concern 3
Odor of Marijuana 482
Room Entry 12
Roommate Issue/Conflict 31
Vandalism/Graffiti 66
One of the biggest differences from the previous 2012-2013 AY is that there was a 52%
reduction in the number of Vandalism/Graffiti incidents from the previous year in which there
were 138 incidents.
11
Conduct 2013-2014 Academic Year Child IR Totals in Advocate
AY 13-14 Conduct Child IR Totals Escort 338
Illegal Appliance 81
Computer Misuse 3
Misuse of University Keys 186
Alcohol 1,046
Improper Room Change 5
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 1,426
Animals 12
Restroom 75
Room Capacity 269
Visitation 56
Complicity 148
Controlled Substances 287
Destruction/Misuse of Property 108
Discrimination 5
Disorderly Conduct 128
Gambling 0
General Safety 1,488
Harassment 23
Laws 8
Misrepresentation 14
Physical Violence 20
Residence Hall Policies 289
Reasonable Request 187
Smoking 36
Theft 21
Sexual Misconduct 11
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 33
Student Conduct Process 1
University Rules 6
Weapons 8
Recording Privacy 3
Interesting Alcohol Facts for AY 13/14
Females accounted for 49.5% of the total alcohol violations.
Males accounted for 50.5% of the total alcohol violations.
12
65 students had TWO repeat Alcohol violations.
12 students had THREE repeat Alcohol violations.
4 students had FOUR repeat Alcohol violations.
1 student had FIVE repeat Alcohol violations.
Last year 115 students had two repeat alcohol violations, compared to the 82 students this year.
Number of Child IR’s Per Person
During the AY 13/14 the following individuals had x number of Child Incident
Reports issued for them:
# of people with 1 Child IR…..…2,663
# of people with 2 Child IR’s….…..673
# of people with 3 Child IR’s….…..241
# of people with 4 Child IR’s…….….90
# of people with 5 Child IR’s………...44
# of people with 6 Child IR’s………...20
# of people with 7 Child IR’s………….14
# of people with 8 Child IR’s…………..5
# of people with 9 Child IR’s……….….2
# of people with 10 Child IR’s…………1
# of people with 11 Child IR’s…………1
# of people with 13 Child IR’s…………1
We saw fewer students documented (about 9% less) this year (3,755) than were documented last
year (4,118). Last year there were 2,717 students with one Child IR, whereas there are 2,663 this
year. Additionally, last year the most IR’s any student had was one student with 10 Child IR’s,
whereas this year it was one student with 13 Child IR’s.
13
Five-Year Comparison of Select Policy Violations
Change Over 5 Years
Odor of Marijuana
AY 09/010
AY 10/11
AY 11/12
AY 12/13
AY 13/14
% from 12/13
% from 09/10
Parent IR's 90 257 269 293 233 -20%
158%
Child IR's 210 523 585 673 483 -28%
130%
Controlled Substances
Parent IR's 47 122 80 92 137 49%
191%
Child IR's 116 248 185 215 285 33%
146%
Alcohol
Parent IR's 289 318 315 297 271 -9%
-6%
Child IR’s 1,084 1,165 1,206 1,105 1,014 -8%
-7%
While we continued to see an overall increase in the number of controlled substance incidents in
the residence halls, we are seeing a decrease in the number of incidents involving alcohol in the
residence halls.
AY 12/13 v. 13/14 Odor of Marijuana Incidents
Hall AY 12/13 Parent IR's
AY 12/13 Child IR's
AY 13/14 Parent IR's
AY 13/14 Child IR's
Allerton 0 0 0 0
Allyn 13 31 7 13
Beall 22 50 17 32
CCA 4 12 10 23
CCB 8 16 0 0
CCC 0 0 1 2
CCD 1 4 2 5
CCE 7 28 2 5
CCF 9 28 7 17
Clark 20 46 6 14
Dunbar 26 60 14 32
Engleman 3 13 0 0
Fletcher 9 23 6 15
Johnson 0 0 0 0
Koonce 39 83 23 49
Korb 11 24 1 4
Lake 34 75 33 66
Leebrick 12 14 11 12
Manchester 11 29 8 19
14
McDowell 9 18 10 33
Olson 4 5 9 15
Prentice 14 24 27 50
Stopher 1 4 0 0
Van Campen 1 4 0 0
Verder 10 20 21 33
Wright 25 62 18 44
TOTAL 293 673 233 483
% Change N/A N/A
AY 12/13 vs. 13/14 Alcohol Incidents per Hall
Hall 12/13 Parent IR's
12/13 Child IR's
13/14 Parent IR's
13/14 Child IR's
Allerton 3 5 1 1
Allyn 13 56 19 92
Beall 26 101 15 47
CCA 17 67 14 40
CCB 10 60 5 37
CCC 3 5 2 5
CCD 5 27 5 10
CCE 17 58 9 52
CCF 15 62 12 45
Clark 16 63 15 57
Dunbar 12 34 15 53
Engleman 4 20 1 6
Fletcher 14 60 21 70
Johnson 2 6 1 9
Koonce 26 89 25 113
Korb 11 29 16 61
Lake 23 78 16 50
Leebrick 3 5 3 7
Manchester 13 49 10 59
McDowell 20 76 8 29
Olson 6 12 6 21
Prentice 9 36 25 84
Stopher 3 15 1 1
Van Campen 1 5 1 1
15
Verder 8 27 8 19
Wright 17 62 17 45
TOTAL 297 1,105 271 1,014
Percent Change -9% -8%
AY 12/13 vs. 13/14 Total Number of Conduct Incidents per Hall
Hall AY 12/13 Parent IR's
AY 12/13 Child IR's
AY 13/14 Parent IR's
AY 13/14 Child IR's
Allerton 5 8 2 8
Allyn 91 273 77 259
Beall 87 214 36 83
CCA 61 164 71 165
CCB 47 135 45 132
CCC 44 56 38 58
CCD 58 149 58 129
CCE 65 163 44 140
CCF 62 168 49 143
Clark 86 223 65 192
Dunbar 57 122 56 141
Engleman 8 37 13 24
Fletcher 47 134 56 158
Johnson 14 43 29 59
Koonce 184 457 134 405
Korb 60 143 57 156
Lake 106 263 71 174
Leebrick 54 69 44 81
Manchester 66 182 69 191
McDowell 78 174 19 47
Olson 26 43 49 130
Prentice 77 142 102 231
Stopher 13 33 21 42
Van Campen 7 21 2 2
Verder 47 90 28 58
Wright 176 406 127 361
TOTAL 1,647 3,912 1,362 3,569
% Change -17% -9%
16
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts
Student Conduct Referrals:
The Department of Residence Services attempts to resolve student disciplinary issues at the
lowest level possible and aim to take an educational approach in addressing these disciplinary
issues – some of which are listed below. When those options have been exhausted then a student
is referred to the Office of Student Conduct for a formal disciplinary hearing. This past
academic year the Office of Student Conduct reported that 266 students were referred to their
office from Residence Services. This accounts for about 50% of their offices’ entire case load
for the year. By comparison, last year there were 296 students referred to Student Conduct from
Residence Services.
Some additional statistics from the Office of Student Conduct this past year:
They conducted 400 Hearings (56% were Sanction Hearings and 44% were Hearing
Panels)
20 non-students were placed on PNG status
Two 1219 Hearings were conducted
26 students were assigned 579 hours of Community Services
Freshmen accounted for 49% of the students referred to their office, Sophomores @ 35%,
Juniors @ 9%, Seniors @ 6% and Graduate students under 1%.
Alcohol eCHECKUP (Online Alcohol Workshop):
In an effort to provide an additional educational component to our inventory of sanctions, the
online eCHECKUP TO GO Alcohol workshop was purchased and staff began to utilize it as a
sanctioning tool starting in the spring 2012 semester. Students found responsible for their first
alcohol policy violation by an A/RHD were to be assigned this online workshop as part of their
sanction. These students then had to verify that they completed the survey so that the RHD
issuing the sanction would know that the sanction had been completed. 255 people completed
the survey this past year. The survey is live and online and can be completed by anyone, which
is why there may be more students taking the survey than are being assigned to do so.
Demographic information of those who completed eCHECKUP:
Males: 45% Females: 55%
Freshman: 73% Sophomore: 24% Junior: 3%
Greek: 12% Non-Greek: 88%
Athletes: 6% Non-Athletes: 94%
On-Campus: 97% Off-Campus: 3%
On average the highest BAC in a typical week for students was 0.11
On the median, students drank about 10 beers per month (Males: 12, Females: 8)
17
On the median, students reported spending $10 per month on alcohol (Males: $15,
Females $6)
Additional Information:
For 225 of the students assigned eCHECKUP, this was their first alcohol violation.
30 students had an alcohol policy violation prior to being assigned eCHECKUP.
After being assigned eCHECKUP…
o 25 students were found in violation of the alcohol policy after being assigned
eCHECKUP
The recidivism rate was 9.8% for those students assigned to eCHECKUP
Marijuana eCHECKUP (Online Marijuana Workshop):
New for the Spring 2014 semester, we implemented the Marijuana eCHECKUP online
workshop (similar to the Alcohol eCHECKUP program) for first or second offence odor of
marijuana offenses occurring in the residence halls to help A/RHD’s expand their resources of
educational sanctions.
22 students completed the survey. One student was documented a second time for Odor of
Marijuana after completing the Marijuana eCHECKUP, making the recidivism rate at 4.5%.
Demographic information of those who completed Marijuana eCHECKUP:
Males: 59% Females: 41%
Freshmen: 50% Sophomores: 41% Juniors: 9%
Greek: 5% Non-Greek: 95%
Athlete: 5% Non-Athlete: 95%
100% lived on-campus
2 ½:: Average DAYS per month students reported to be under the influence
28 ½: Average HOURS per month reported to be under the influence
$76.62: Average spent on MARIJUANA in a typical month
o Males averaged $86.66 and Females averaged $62.11
$48.47: Average spent on ALCOHOL in a typical month
o Males averaged $50.61 and Females averaged $45.39
Parental Notification:
The Department of Residence Services notifies the parents/guardians of residence hall students
under the age of 21 if their student is found to be in violation of the residence hall alcohol
policies and who has not been cited by the police or referred to Student Conduct. A/RHD’s
18
notify their supervisor when a student is documented and found responsible for violation of the
alcohol policy and the Assistant Director, Residential Communities for each area send these
letters to the students’ permanent addresses.
During the AY 13/14, 202 students were issued Parental Notification Letters. By comparison,
356 students received a PNL last year, 261 students received a PNL in AY 11/12, 194 students
in AY 10/11 and 92 students received a PNL in AY 09/10.
Community Billing:
All floor/community residents can collectively be held responsible for damages to public areas
that cannot be attributed to specific individuals.
The AY 13/14 saw 13 separate community billings resulting in a total amount of $8,143.80. By
comparison, last year there were 17 separate community billings resulting in a total of $5,659.01.
Psychological Referral Letters:
The Department of Residence Services will issue a student who has experienced a psychological
crisis a letter mandating they be evaluated by the university’s Psychological Services Office
before they can be cleared to remain in on-campus housing. In AY 13/14 there were 41 students
issued a Psychological Referral Letter, the same number that were issued the previous year.
30 were from the Tri/Twin/Eastway area, 9 were from the Quad/NF/CC’s area and 2 were from
Allerton.
Ethical Decision Making Initiatives:
During the spring 2013 semester, the Office of Student Conduct started a new two-hour Decision
Making and Ethics Workshop (DMEW) that A/RHD’s and Hearing Officers can utilize as an
educational sanctioning tool.
o During the 2013-2014 AY, 83 students were assigned to attend the DMEW.
o 23 (30%) students did not attend.
New for the start of the Fall 2014 semester, the DMEW workshop is being remained Students
Involved in Responsible Character Awareness (SIRCA). This change in name is the result of
covering more than just decision making and ethics material. This newly updated workshop will
cover topics such as values, historical discourse, morals and ultimately responsible character
awareness.
The Department of Residence Services created a new Ethical Decision Making Webpage that
was unveiled for spring 2013, linked from our homepage, where students who are assigned to
complete Alcohol e-CHECKUP must now view and complete a short Ethical Decision Quiz
before they receive the link to complete Alcohol e-CHECKUP.
19
Listing of All Residence Services Sanctions Issued to Students in AY 13/14:
Residence Services Sanction Number
RS - Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO Program 271
RS - Behavioral Contract 19
RS - Decision Making and Ethics Workshop 23
RS - Letter of Warning 1,071
RS - No Sanction Issued 28
RS - Parent/Guardian Notification Letter 267
RS - Reflection Paper - Other 47
RS - Reflection Paper on ALCOHOL USE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 12
RS - Reflection Paper on DECISION MAKING 43
RS - Reflection Paper on DRUG USE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 10
RS - Reflection Paper on LEGAL AND PROFESSIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF DRUG USE 10
RS - Reflection Paper on RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS 45
RS - Reflection Project 7
RS - Reflection Questions for use with eCHECKUP TO GO PROGRAM 155
RS – Marijuana eCHECKUP TO GO Program 24
RS- Community Service 6
RS-Other 75
NOTE: The “RS – Other” sanction included sanctions such as requiring a student to attend hall
council meetings, writing a letter of apology to RA or staff member, create an education program
or poster/bulletin board around alcohol, or remove a fire safety violation item from the room.
Student Conduct Revenue
Students who attend a Student Conduct hearing and who plead responsible for are found
responsible are issued an automatic hearing fee and sometimes are also assigned additional fines
by the Hearing Officer. The revenue from this office for this fiscal year was $15,033. FY ’13
was $16,775.09 followed by FY ’12 at $16,871.21.
20
KSUPD Vandalism Calls to Residence Halls
During this academic year the KSU Police Department took 60 reports for various acts of
vandalism that occurred in the residence halls on campus. NOTE: The KSU Police reports are
for Criminal Damage and Criminal Mischief charges, which are what we (Residence Services)
would view and classify as Vandalism.
Hall/Location AY 10/11 AY 11/12 AY 12/13 AY 13/14 Allerton 0 0 2 0
Allyn 7 6 12 7
Beall 0 1 2 0
CCA 3 1 3 0
CCB 5 0 4 1
CCC 0 1 2 0
CCD 2 1 2 0
CCE 1 4 7 3
CCF 2 3 1 1
Clark 6 6 9 8
Dunbar 2 4 3 0
Engleman 1 1 0 0
Fletcher 10 9 8 3
Koonce 9 12 7 8
Korb 0 8 2 4
Lake 24 6 8 4
Leebrick 0 0 0 2
Manchester 9 12 3 2
McDowell 0 1 3 1
Olson 3 4 7 5
Prentice 11 3 25 2
Tri Rotunda 5 5 3 3
Verder 14 14 2 0
Wright 0 5 3 6
TOTAL 121 107 123 60
21
Policy Recommendations for 2014-2015
Continuation of Existing Policies/Practices:
The Tri-Towers Rotunda Guest Registration policy continues to have a positive effect
on the overall safety and security of the Tri Rotunda area after midnight on the weekends
by limiting access of non-students. Due to Rosie’s Diner being a 24-hour operation, it
requires additional security during these late night hours so that we can avoid previous
incidents of violence caused mainly by non-students looking for a late-night place to eat
in Kent.
Contacting KSU Police for Alcohol Parties in the residence halls is effective in reducing
the number of alcohol violations. Since this policy has gone in effect we have seen a
decrease in the number of alcohol incidents and decrease in the number of students being
documented for an alcohol policy violation in the residence halls. Additionally, the
percentage of time that the KSU police have been called for “alcohol policies” has
decreased to fewer than 50% of the “alcohol parties”. Simply stated, we are seeing
positive results. For these reasons, this practice of contacting KSU police for “alcohol
parties” should continue for the foreseeable future.
The more intentional enforcement of the Quiet Hours policy should continue for the next
academic year. Residential students continue to disclose through the EBI survey that
living in a quieter environment is important for study and sleep reasons, but yet their
community still remains too noisy at times. While we started with a zero-tolerance
approach in the fall 2013 semester, we recognized that this type of approach was not very
effective and in some instances was causing staff to avoid confronting residents for noise
issues because they didn’t want to document them every single time.
This past year was the second complete academic year that saw the introduction of the
Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO online alcohol survey for students being found
responsible for an alcohol policy violation. This tool that was introduced to the A/RHD
staff to help provide an additional educational resource for addressing underage drinking
on-campus. The recidivism rate for the students completing eCHECKUP this year was
just under 10%. Continued use of the Alcohol eCHECKUP program is recommended as
is adds a valuable educational tool that A/RHD’s have at their disposal and is fairly
inexpensive.
This past spring 2014 semester saw the first semester in which we introduced the
Marijuana eCHECKUP TO GO online survey, similar to that of the Alcohol
eCHECKUP program. With further education on the part of hall staff about this program
and the continued increase in marijuana incidents in the residence halls, it is hopeful that
22
this program can help have an impact on the rise in controlled substance violations for the
future. Future results are needed to verify if this program will have an impact on student
behavior.
The centralized distribution of student disciplinary cases to RHDs continues to work well
with our Centralized Discipline model. RHDs continue to be assigned about the same
number of student discipline cases to hear each semester, thereby creating a more
balanced and equal distribution of the discipline workload among the entire RHD staff.
This year the Coordinator for Safety & Security was also added to the responsibility of
reviewing, editing and assigned of these cases. This practice should continue to for the
foreseeable future.
This past year was the second completed year for Fire Safety Room Inspections in the
first 3-4 weeks of the fall semester. While we only saw a slight 2% reduction in fire
safety policy violations in the first year, this second year of implementation we saw much
improved results of 38.8% reduction in fire safety violations. While these results are very
promising, we need to continue to educate our RA staff on the importance of why this is
done to help them see the value in being thorough in their Fire Safety Checks. If this is
done, then even greater results should be expected in the future.
For Future Recommendations:
Additional training for A/RHD staff is needed to focus on the following areas:
o When A/RHD staff meet with a student for a Quiet Hours policy violation, more
emphasis should be placed upon the negative impact that student is having on the
community and help them to understand how their actions can – and do – affect
others living in the community.
o The introduction of Restorative Justice principles will begin to have more
emphasis in our student conduct meetings with students, so additional training of
A/RHD staff will be needed to conducted so that our staff are more educated and
prepared to help in this new path forward.
We will not only continue to see Odor of Marijuana issues in the residence halls, but
more than likely an increase number of this Non-Conduct issue. As such, continued
discussions and trainings should take place on a regular basis to help our A/RHD staff
become more comfortable in having these conversations with students.
23
Fall 2013
Overview and Statistics
24
Overview of Fall 2013 Security Information
Listed below are Security stats at a glance for the fall 2013 semester. For comparison purposes a
summary of similar stats are shared from the previous fall semester.
Key Security Facts for Fall 2013
Security Aides responded to a total of 743 incidents
291 of the 743 incidents were for noise complaints
Security Aides completed 344 escorts, plus an additional 76 RA escorts
By Comparison – Fall 2012
Security Aides responded to a total of 1,042 incidents
534 out of the 1,042 incidents were for noise complaints
Security Aides completed 292 escorts
The total number of incidents that Security responded to saw a decrease of about 29% and the
number of escorts increased by about 18% (46% if you include the RA escorts), the number of
noise complaints Security Aides responded to subsequently decreased by about 46% from the
previous year.
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day
The chart below illustrates the 743 incidents that Security responded to by hour and day for the
fall semester. Thursday night continues to be the busiest and most active night on campus.
Fall 2013 Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 8 6 4 7 10 5 20 60
9:00 - 10:00 15 18 12 7 37 21 25 135
10:00 - 11:00 8 16 10 8 35 19 26 122
11:00 - 12:00 13 14 10 11 25 28 24 125
12:00 - 1:00 17 20 6 14 15 12 8 92
1:00 - 2:00 5 13 8 11 20 17 20 94
2:00 - 3:00 3 10 12 9 16 6 28 84
3:00 - 4:00 1 1 6 2 9 4 8 31
TOTAL 70 98 68 69 167 112 159 743
25
The following charts are a breakdown of the semester incidents by each month of the semester.
August Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 3 0 1 0 0 2 1 7 9:00 - 10:00 3 2 1 1 3 0 1 11 10:00 - 11:00 1 1 0 1 1 2 3 9 11:00 - 12:00 1 0 0 2 2 0 1 6 12:00 - 1:00 3 1 1 2 0 3 0 10 1:00 - 2:00 0 1 0 0 4 4 2 11 2:00 - 3:00 1 1 0 0 2 1 4 9 3:00 - 4:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 TOTAL 12 6 3 6 13 12 13 65
September
Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 3 2 0 2 2 1 1 11 9:00 - 10:00 4 3 2 1 16 6 9 41 10:00 - 11:00 2 5 3 1 10 2 4 27 11:00 - 12:00 3 4 3 1 7 5 7 30 12:00 - 1:00 9 4 2 2 6 2 2 27 1:00 - 2:00 2 4 2 4 6 3 5 26 2:00 - 3:00 2 1 2 3 2 2 5 17 3:00 - 4:00 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 7 TOTAL 25 23 14 15 51 23 35 186
October Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 1 1 1 4 4 0 16 27 9:00 - 10:00 4 6 3 4 11 9 11 48 10:00 - 11:00 2 3 4 4 14 12 12 51 11:00 - 12:00 3 2 4 1 9 5 9 33 12:00 - 1:00 1 6 1 3 6 3 3 23 1:00 - 2:00 1 2 1 3 5 3 7 22 2:00 - 3:00 0 3 3 2 9 0 10 27 3:00 - 4:00 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 8 TOTAL 12 23 19 21 60 34 70 239
26
November Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 0 1 2 0 4 2 1 10 9:00 - 10:00 2 5 3 0 4 4 2 20 10:00 - 11:00 0 6 3 1 8 2 6 26 11:00 - 12:00 4 6 1 3 6 7 8 35 12:00 - 1:00 2 7 2 4 3 5 2 25 1:00 - 2:00 0 4 1 1 1 5 5 17 2:00 - 3:00 0 4 5 3 3 2 6 23 3:00 - 4:00 1 0 1 0 4 0 3 9 TOTAL 9 33 18 12 33 27 33 165
December Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 6 9:00 - 10:00 2 2 3 1 4 2 2 16 10:00 - 11:00 3 1 0 1 2 1 1 9 11:00 - 12:00 2 3 2 4 1 2 0 14 12:00 - 1:00 2 2 1 3 0 0 1 9 1:00 - 2:00 2 2 4 3 4 2 1 18 2:00 - 3:00 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 11 3:00 - 4:00 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 5 TOTAL 13 14 15 15 14 8 9 88
Residence Hall Fire Alarms
During the fall 2013 semester there were 97 fire alarms that occurred in the residence halls that
resulted in the fire department being dispatched to the residence halls. Cooking was the #1 cause
of the fire alarms. CCC had the highest number of fire alarms (10) and McDowell and Korb
Halls tied for the second most at seven (7) fire alarms each. This is up from the previous fall
semester in which there were 84 fire alarms in the residence halls, but down from fall 2011 in
which there were 107 fire alarms.
New this year, we installed Safe-T-Sensors on each of the microwaves in student rooms in CCA
and Korb Hall over the summer, as these two halls had the most cooking false alarms last
academic year. In the fall 2013 semester, CCA had two cooking false alarms (rooms 103 and
111) and Korb had one cooking false alarm in room 617.
27
Fire Safety Room Inspections
Due to the large number of fire safety violations being found during Winter and Spring closings
during 2011-2012, the Department of Residence Services implemented a new Fire Safety Room
Inspection process of all resident’s rooms in the first few weeks of the fall semester in order to
identify and educate residents regarding these potential fire safety hazards before the end of the
semester. It is hoped that this will also dramatically reduce the number of violations being found
during the Winter and Spring Break Closings. Below is a listing of the 765 fire safety violations
that were found in each hall during Fire Safety Inspections in mid-September. In Fall 2012 there
were 850 rooms documented.
Tri Towers Rotunda Guest Registration
Summary
In the fall 2013 semester there were a total of 362 students who registered a total of 436 guests.
Of the 436 guests, 63 were from out-of-state. These out-of-state quests were from 10 different
states and the District of Columbia with an overwhelming number (41) coming from PA. By
comparison, in fall 2012 there were 364 student hosts with 442 registered guests, of which 51
were from out-of-state.
There were 25 residence halls with at least one registered host and guest this semester. Not
surprisingly, the halls with the most number of registered hosts and guests were the three halls in
Tri-Towers. Koonce had the most with 115 hosts and 134 guests followed by Leebrick with 71
hosts and 78 guests and then Wright with 57 hosts and 77 guests.
Hall Name 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor 5th Floor 6th Floor 7th Floor 8th Floor 9th Floor 10th Floor 11th Floor 12th Floor Total
Leebrick 0 8 3 3 0 4 2 4 1 8 1 34
Korb 1 10 1 5 6 23
Koonce 2 2 13 2 0 5 6 1 6 0 37
Wright 2 15 0 21 16 6 1 20 17 5 103
Lake 0 4 30 5 39
Olson 6 15 0 10 31
Allyn 4 5 25 17 51
Clark 0 12 18 6 36
Manchester 2 8 3 3 16
Fletcher 4 5 2 17 28
CCA 3 3 5 20 31
CCB 6 20 6 6 38
CCC 7 5 1 14 27
CCD 15 2 3 15 35
CCE 4 7 4 8 23
CCF 4 6 8 12 30
Beall 3 5 0 1 0 12 7 1 29
McDowell 1 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 9
Dunbar 3 27 19 49
Prentice 8 41 14 63
Verder N/A
Engleman N/A
Stopher 5 7 11 23
Johnson 3 4 3 10
765
28
Number of Hosts & Guests Per Hall in Fall 2013
Hall # Hosts # Guests
ALL 2 3
BEA 5 6
CCA 5 8
CCB 7 8
CCC 6 7
CCD 6 7
CCE 10 12
CCF 13 16
CLA 11 12
DUN 3 3
ENG 1 1
FLE 9 11
JOH 4 4
KOO 115 134
KOR 18 25
LAK 4 4
LEE 71 78
MAN 2 2
MCD 4 6
OLS 1 2
PRE 3 3
STO 2 3
VAN 1 1
VER 2 3
WRI 57 77
TOTAL 362 436
29
Centralized Discipline Overview
Each RHD was assigned generally between 151 – 159 conduct Child Incident Report cases in
Advocate during the fall 2013 semester for a total of 1,807 Child IR’s being assigned. This
represents a nearly 5% increase in the number of cases from the previous fall 2012 semester in
which there were 1,728 cases assigned.
These numbers do not reflect non-conduct type of cases (i.e., flu-like, vandalism, psychological,
EMS, roommate issue/concerns, etc.) nor do they reflect the Winter Break Closing cases that
were inputted into Advocate during and after Winter Break.
Hall Allyn/Clark 155
Beall/McDowell/VanCampen 151
CCA/CCB 153
CCC/CCD 116
CCE/CCF 154
Dunbar/Prentice 153
Fletcher/Manchester 158
Johnson/Stopher 91
Koonce 158
Lake/Olson 155
Leebrick/Korb 159
Verder/Engleman 50
Wright 154
TOTAL 1,807
Winter Break Closing Violations
Before hall staff left for Winter Break they inspected residence hall rooms for closing and fire
safety violations, as well as KSU Fire Prevention did during the break period, resulting in a total
of 600 Parent IR’s and 1,111 Child IR’s for Winter Break Closing Violations. This is down
slightly from last year in which there were 1,009 Parent IR’s and 1,866 Child IR’s.
There were primarily two violations, Residence Hall Policies (i.e., closing violations) and
General Safety (i.e., fire safety violations) for these Winter Break Closing violations.
Violation Parent IR’s Child IR’s Residence Hall Policies 132 255
General Safety 468 856
30
Alcohol Incidents Called Into Security
In the fall 2013 semester there were 66 incidents involving alcohol (that met our Department’s
definition of a “party”) that were called into Security that required the Assistant Director and/or
Assistant Security Manager to respond to. This resulted in 374 people being documented for an
alcohol policy violation. The KSUPD were called to 33 (50%) of these incidents and they cited
87 (23%) of the individuals. Six of these incidents occurred on Halloween.
These figures show mixed results from the previous fall semester.
The total number of “alcohol parties” was down more than 30% (95 to 66) from fall
2012.
The number of people documented was down almost 27% (511 to 374) from fall 2012.
The number of times KSU PD was called was down 28% (46 to 33) from fall 2012.
The number of people cited by KSU PD was down 4% (91 to 87) from fall 2012.
These alcohol incidents occurred during the following days of the week:
Sunday (7); Monday (0); Tuesday (1); Wednesday (0); Thursday (18); Friday (9), and
Saturday (31*).
(* 31 is slightly misleading in that 60% of the incidents - 19 - occurred on Halloween.)
The chart listed below represents the total number of alcohol Parent and Child Incident Reports
per hall during the fall 2013 semester and compares the data to the previous fall 2012 semester. It
reveals that there was a 28% decrease in number of alcohol incidents in fall 2013 resulting in
27% fewer people being documented than in fall 2012.
Fall 2012 v 2013 Alcohol Incidents per Hall
Hall ‘12 Parent IR's
‘12 Child IR's
‘13 Parent IR's
‘13 Child IR's
Allerton 3 5 1 1
Allyn 8 31 9 44
Beall 18 65 10 34
CCA 11 39 8 22
CCB 7 44 3 23
CCC 1 2 1 4
CCD 5 27 0 0
CCE 11 41 8 47
CCF 8 32 5 32
Clark 8 36 4 17
31
Dunbar 7 19 6 19
Engleman 4 20 1 6
Fletcher 7 25 5 20
Johnson 2 6 1 9
Koonce 13 44 11 48
Korb 6 16 7 29
Lake 13 51 10 25
Leebrick 1 3 2 6
Manchester 7 36 3 12
McDowell 14 60 5 22
Olson 2 7 1 1
Prentice 4 23 15 60
Stopher 1 5 0 0
Van Campen 1 5 0 0
Verder 4 14 1 1
Wright 11 38 10 25
TOTAL 177 692 127 507
% CHANGE -28% -27%
Prentice Hall saw the largest increase and had more alcohol incidents and the most number of
individuals documented for alcohol than any other hall.
Notes of Interest:
CCB: Two of the incidents consisted of 91% of the individuals documented.
Dunbar: All of the incidents occurred on the 2nd
floor.
Fletcher: All of the incidents occurred on the 3rd
floor.
Korb: 57% of the incidents occurred on the 2nd
floor.
Leebrick: Both incidents occurred in the same room.
Prentice: 60 % of the incidents occurred on the 3rd
floor and just three rooms accounted
for 47% of the all the alcohol incidents.
32
Odor of Marijuana & Controlled Substances Stats
The chart below represents the total number of controlled substance and odor of marijuana policy
violations that were documented in the residence halls in the fall semester.
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
% Change from '12
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Odor of Marijuana 150 345
108* 223*
N/A N/A Controlled Substances 51 129
72 155
41% 20%
*Fall 2013 saw a change in how Odor of Marijuana was documented. It is now documented
as a Non-Conduct IR, where as previously it was a Conduct IR and would have been counted
for most every Controlled Substance violation as well.
The following chart lists the number of Odor of Marijuana incidents that occurred in the
residence halls from fall 2012 to fall 2013. But, due to new documentation procedures for
Odor of Marijuana, there is no accurate comparison to previous semesters.
Notes of Interest:
Beall: 60% of incidents were documented on the 3rd
floor.
Clark: All occurred on the 2nd
floor, and one room (244) accounted for 75% of the
incidents.
Dunbar: 75% of incidents were documented on the 2nd
floor and one room (243) was
documented three times.
Fletcher: 50% of the incidents were documented in one room (230).
Lake: Three rooms accounted for 55% of the incidents with one room (343) being
documented seven times and accounting for 32% of the incidents by itself.
Manchester: 80% of incidents were documented on the 2nd
floor.
Prentice: Two rooms accounted for 25% of the incidents.
Wright: One room (926) accounted for 38% of the incidents.
Fall '12 v '13 Odor of Marijuana Incidents
Hall ‘12 Parent IR's
‘12 Child IR's
‘13 Parent IR's
‘13 Child IR's
Allerton 0 0 0 0
Allyn 5 11 5 9
Beall 14 28 5 8
CCA 3 10 4 7
CCB 1 1 0 0
33
CCC 0 0 1 2
CCD 1 4 0 0
CCE 4 18 0 0
CCF 6 24 3 4
Clark 12 27 4 9
Dunbar 16 39 8 18
Engleman 1 5 0 0
Fletcher 4 10 4 9
Johnson 0 0 0 0
Koonce 14 28 12 27
Korb 8 15 0 0
Lake 18 40 22 45
Leebrick 6 7 3 4
Manchester 2 3 5 12
McDowell 4 10 4 15
Olson 2 2 1 2
Prentice 10 17 16 27
Stopher 1 4 0 0
Van Campen 0 0 0 0
Verder 7 15 3 4
Wright 11 27 8 21
TOTAL 150 345 108 223
% Change N/A N/A
The following chart lists the number of Controlled Substance violations per hall during the fall
2013 semester.
Notes of Interest:
55% of all the incidents occurred in just four residence halls (Koonce, Lake, Prentice
and Wright).
Beall: 2/3 of the incidents occurred on the 8th
floor.
CCA: Both of the incidents occurred on the 1st floor.
Dunbar: Both of the incidents occurred on the 2nd
floor.
Koonce: 1/3 of the incidents occurred on the 10th
floor with room 1010 being
documented twice.
Lake: Two rooms were documented twice.
Leebrick: 60% of the incidents occurred on the 5th
floor.
Prentice: 73% of incidents occurred on the 2nd
floor with two rooms being documented
twice.
34
Fall ‘13 Controlled Substance Incidents
Hall Parent IR's Child IR's
Allerton 0 0
Allyn 3 7
Beall 3 7
CCA 2 4
CCB 2 2
CCC 0 0
CCD 1 2
CCE 0 0
CCF 0 0
Clark 0 0
Dunbar 2 4
Engleman 0 0
Fletcher 3 6
Johnson 0 0
Koonce 9 20
Korb 2 2
Lake 11 29
Leebrick 5 6
Manchester 3 7
McDowell 1 2
Olson 4 7
Prentice 11 25
Stopher 0 0
Van Campen 0 0
Verder 2 3
Wright 8 22
TOTAL 72 155
The chart on the following page represents the total number of incidents that occurred in each
residence hall this past semester compared to the previous fall semester.
35
Fall 2012 vs. 2013 Total Number of Conduct Incidents per Hall
Hall ‘12 Parent IR's ‘12 Child IR's ‘13 Parent IR's ‘13 Child IR's
Allerton 3 5 2 8
Allyn 48 164 47 168
Beall 40 110 22 55
CCA 21 69 31 81
CCB 14 59 20 59
CCC 4 5 9 20
CCD 15 46 24 65
CCE 22 66 14 69
CCF 20 65 20 75
Clark 48 139 22 85
Dunbar 30 68 28 71
Engleman 5 25 3 9
Fletcher 20 51 28 71
Johnson 7 29 3 12
Koonce 86 225 69 206
Korb 31 61 29 87
Lake 52 145 41 88
Leebrick 21 29 24 50
Manchester 30 88 51 122
McDowell 25 83 9 33
Olson 14 22 20 59
Prentice 36 79 49 129
Stopher 4 11 4 4
VanCampen 1 5 1 1
Verder 17 35 13 25
Wright 60 164 76 235
TOTAL 674 1,848 659 1,887
% Change -2% +2%
Wright Hall had the most activity with 76 incidents involving 235 people being documented.
Koonce Hall had the second most activity with 69 incidents involving 206 people being
documented. Allyn Hall also had 168 people documented, but with only 47 incidents. Not
surprisingly, Van Campen saw the least amount of activity with one incident resulting in one
person being documented.
36
Fall 2013 Conduct Child IR Totals
Conduct Incident Type # of Child IR's
Alcohol 507
Animals 5
Complicity 97
Computer Misuse 2
Controlled Substances 155
Destruction/Misuse of Property 49
Discrimination 2
Disorderly Conduct 67
Escort 196
General Safety 71
Harassment 12
Illegal Appliance 3
Improper Room Change 2
Laws 2
Misrepresentation 5
Misuse of University Keys 111
Physical Violence 10
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 975
Reasonable Request 97
Residence Hall Policies 3
Restroom 37
Room Capacity 155
Sexual Misconduct 4
Smoking 20
Theft 12
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 20
University Rules 3
Visitation 30
Weapons 1
A look at what incidents occurred in each hall in Fall 2013
Allerton Apartments
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Alcohol 1
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 7
37
Allyn Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 2
Misuse of University Keys 4
Alcohol 44
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 120
Room Capacity 24
Visitation 7
Complicity 18
Controlled Substances 7
Destruction/Misuse of Property 6
Disorderly Conduct 6
General Safety 4
Reasonable Request 15
Theft 1
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 3
Beall Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Alcohol 34
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 27
Complicity 5
Controlled Substances 7
Destruction/Misuse of Property 3
General Safety 10
Misrepresentation 1
Reasonable Request 5
Smoking 1
Theft 4
Weapons 1
Centennial Court A
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 21
Misuse of University Keys 8
Alcohol 22
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 32
Complicity 3
Controlled Substances 4
38
Destruction/Misuse of Property 3
Disorderly Conduct 3
Reasonable Request 5
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 2
Centennial Court B
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 10
Misuse of University Keys 6
Alcohol 23
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 14
Room Capacity 17
Complicity 12
Computer Misuse 1
Controlled Substances 2
Destruction/Misuse of Property 2
Disorderly Conduct 2
General Safety 4
Theft 1
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 2
Centennial Court C
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 4
Alcohol 4
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 13
Harassment 3
Reasonable Request 6
Centennial Court D
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 2
Misuse of University Keys 3
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 57
Controlled Substances 2
Disorderly Conduct 1
Reasonable Request 3
Residence Hall Policies 1
Theft 1
39
Centennial Court E
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Alcohol 47
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 37
Room Capacity 33
Complicity 15
Disorderly Conduct 1
General Safety 9
Misrepresentation 1
Reasonable Request 8
Centennial Court F
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 14
Misuse of University Keys 7
Alcohol 32
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 20
Room Capacity 14
Complicity 6
Disorderly Conduct 2
General Safety 4
Laws 1
Physical Violence 4
Reasonable Request 9
Smoking 5
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 4
Clark Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 2
Misuse of University Keys 2
Alcohol 17
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 63
Restroom 1
Room Capacity 20
Complicity 4
Destruction/Misuse of Property 1
Disorderly Conduct 3
40
General Safety 1
Sexual Misconduct 1
Theft 1
University Rules 1
Dunbar Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 1
Alcohol 19
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 41
Complicity 4
Controlled Substances 4
Destruction/Misuse of Property 3
Disorderly Conduct 7
General Safety 4
Harassment 3
Smoking 1
Theft 1
Engleman Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Misuse of University Keys 2
Alcohol 6
General Safety 1
Fletcher Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Misuse of University Keys 1
Alcohol 20
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 36
Visitation 4
Complicity 10
Controlled Substances 6
Destruction/Misuse of Property 4
Disorderly Conduct 4
Harassment 1
Reasonable Request 3
Sexual Misconduct 1
Smoking 2
41
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 2
Johnson Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Alcohol 9
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 8
Room Capacity 9
General Safety 3
Koonce Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 14
Illegal Appliance 1
Misuse of University Keys 12
Alcohol 48
Improper Room Change 2
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 113
Animals 3
Restroom 9
Complicity 7
Controlled Substances 20
Disorderly Conduct 3
General Safety 9
Reasonable Request 1
Smoking 2
Korb Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Illegal Appliance 2
Misuse of University Keys 2
Alcohol 29
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 46
Visitation 1
Controlled Substances 2
Destruction/Misuse of Property 4
Disorderly Conduct 1
General Safety 3
Harassment 1
Residence Hall Policies 2
42
Theft 1
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 1
Lake Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 17
Misuse of University Keys 14
Alcohol 26
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 14
Restroom 2
Complicity 2
Controlled Substances 29
Destruction/Misuse of Property 7
Disorderly Conduct 4
General Safety 1
Reasonable Request 4
Smoking 1
Leebrick Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Alcohol 6
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 36
Room Capacity 10
Complicity 2
Controlled Substances 6
Destruction/Misuse of Property 1
Disorderly Conduct 2
General Safety 3
Physical Violence 1
Reasonable Request 2
Smoking 1
Manchester Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 25
Misuse of University Keys 6
Alcohol 12
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 61
Restroom 6
43
Room Capacity 9
Visitation 12
Controlled Substances 7
Destruction/Misuse of Property 11
Discrimination 2
Disorderly Conduct 6
General Safety 4
Harassment 3
Laws 1
Misrepresentation 1
Reasonable Request 13
Smoking 1
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 5
McDowell Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Alcohol 22
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 8
Animals 2
Controlled Substances 2
Disorderly Conduct 1
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 1
Olson Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 2
Misuse of University Keys 8
Alcohol 1
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 35
Visitation 2
Computer Misuse 1
Controlled Substances 7
Destruction/Misuse of Property 1
Disorderly Conduct 2
General Safety 2
Smoking 2
Theft 2
44
Prentice Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 12
Misuse of University Keys 17
Alcohol 60
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 42
Restroom 15
Room Capacity 9
Visitation 4
Complicity 2
Controlled Substances 25
Destruction/Misuse of Property 3
Disorderly Conduct 12
General Safety 3
Misrepresentation 2
Physical Violence 3
Reasonable Request 9
Stopher Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 1
Harassment 1
Sexual Misconduct 1
Smoking 1
Van Campen Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Misuse of University Keys 1
Verder Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 4
Misuse of University Keys 4
Alcohol 1
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 10
Controlled Substances 3
Disorderly Conduct 5
General Safety 1
45
Physical Violence 2
Sexual Misconduct 1
Smoking 1
Wright Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 66
Misuse of University Keys 14
Alcohol 25
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 134
Restroom 4
Room Capacity 10
Complicity 7
Controlled Substances 22
Disorderly Conduct 2
General Safety 5
Reasonable Request 14
Smoking 2
University Rules 2
Fall 2013 Non-Conduct Child IR Totals
Non-Conduct Offense Type # of Child IR's
Damage 6
Early Alert Notice 1
Emergency Room Change 2
EMS 43
Facilities Issues/Concerns/Problem 21
General Issue/Concern 60
Illness/Injury 23
Mental Health Issue/Concern 25
Odor of Marijuana 223
Parent Issue/Concern 2
Room Entry 2
Roommate Issue/Conflict 14
Vandalism/Graffiti 27
46
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts
eCHECKUP (Online Alcohol Workshop):
113 students completed the survey, while 107 of those students verified that they had completed
the survey. The survey is live and online and can be completed by anyone, which is why there
may be more students taking the survey than are being assigned to do so.
Demographic information of those who completed eCHECKUP:
Males: 48% Females: 52%
Greek: 15% Non-Greek: 85%
Athletes: 5% Non-Athletes: 95%
Live On-Campus: 96% Live Off-Campus: 4%
Freshman: 76% Sophomore: 19% Junior: 4%
Students spent on average about $18.83 per week on alcohol
On average the highest BAC in a typical week for students was 0.10
On the median, students drank about nine (9) beers per month
Additional Information:
For 95 of the students assigned eCHECKUP, this was their first alcohol violation.
12 students had a previous alcohol policy violation prior to being assigned eCHECKUP..
After being assigned eCHECKUP…
3 students were found in violation of the alcohol policy one more time
4 students were found in violation of alcohol policy two more times
The recidivism rate was about 6.5% for those students assigned to eCHECKUP
Decision making and Ethical Workshop (OSC):
Five workshops were scheduled over the course of the fall semester. Four, seven, seven, six, and
six students were assigned to each of the five workshops respectively for a total of 30 students
being assigned to attend. Seven (23%) students failed to attend and two arrived 10 minutes late
and will have to reschedule.
Parental Notification Letters (PNL):
The Department of Residence Services notifies the parents/guardians of residence hall students
under the age of 21 if their student is found to be in violation of the residence hall alcohol
policies and who has not been cited by the police or referred to the Office of Student Conduct.
A/RHD’s notify their supervisor when a student is documented and found responsible for
47
violation of the alcohol policy and the Assistant Director for each area sends these letters to the
students’ permanent addresses.
During the fall semester 108 students were issued Parental Notification Letters (62 from Josette
and 46 from Kim). While this is a 52% decrease from the previous fall semester in which 226
students were issues PNL’s, it is only a modest decrease from two years ago in which there were
129 students issued PNL’s.
Community Billing:
All floor/community residents can collectively be held responsible for damages to public areas
that cannot be attributed to specific individuals.
The fall semester saw $4,897 in community billing from Josette’s area for $2,422 and $2,475
from Kim’s area in damages that were billed.
CCD – All residents billed for $1,696.50 (lounge door replacement)
Prentice Hall – 3rd
floor residents billed for $725.50 (vandalism to bathroom and hallway)
Wright Hall - $175
Wright Hall – 9th
floor residents billed for $1,500
Fletcher Hall – All residents billed for $800
Psychological Referral Letters:
The Department of Residence Services will issue a student who has experienced a psychological
crisis a letter mandating they be evaluated by the university’s Psychological Services Office
before they can be cleared to remain in on-campus housing. During the fall semester there were
25 students issued a Psychological Referral Letter. The previous fall semester there were 20
Psychological Referral Letters issued.
12 each from the Tri/Twin/Eastway and Quad/NF/CC’s areas and one from Allerton.
48
Listing of All Residence Services Sanctions Issued to Students in Fall 2013:
Residence Services Sanction Number
RS - Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO Program 131
RS - Behavioral Contract 10
RS - Decision Making and Ethics Workshop 11
RS - Letter of Warning 705
RS - No Sanction Issued 22
RS - Parent/Guardian Notification Letter 133
RS - Reflection Paper - Other 31
RS - Reflection Paper on ALCOHOL USE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 7
RS - Reflection Paper on DECISION MAKING 22
RS - Reflection Paper on DRUG USE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 10
RS - Reflection Paper on LEGAL AND PROFESSIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF DRUG USE 8
RS - Reflection Paper on RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS 14
RS - Reflection Project 1
RS - Reflection Questions for use with eCHECKUP TO GO PROGRAM 60
RS- Community Service 3
RS-Other 43
49
Spring 2014
Overview and Statistics
50
Overview of Spring 2014 Information
Listed below are Security stats at a glance for the spring 2014 semester. For comparison
purposes a summary of similar stats are shared from the previous spring 2013 semester.
Key Security Facts for Spring 2014
Security Aides responded to a total of 896 incidents
445 of the 896 incidents were for noise complaints
Security Aides completed 282 escorts, plus an additional 41 RA escorts
In Comparison – Spring 2013
Security Aides responded to a total of 743 incidents
291 of the 743 incidents were for noise complaints
Security Aides completed 344 escorts
Incidents Security Responded to by Hour and Day
The charts below illustrate the 743 incidents that Security responded to by hour and day each
month during the spring 2014 semester. The busiest nights continue to be Thursday nights.
January Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00
0 0 2 0 4 1 1 8
9:00 - 10:00
4 6 3 3 5 7 2 30
10:00 - 11:00
4 2 3 1 8 2 7 27
11:00 - 12:00
3 4 2 4 10 7 4 34
12:00 - 1:00
2 4 4 0 9 3 3 25
1:00 - 2:00
1 3 1 1 10 3 5 24
2:00 - 3:00
3 3 1 0 5 5 8 25
3:00 - 4:00
2 4 0 0 3 3 4 16
TOTAL
19 26 16 9 54 31 34 189
51
February
Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00
0 0 0 3 1 1 3 8
9:00 - 10:00
2 1 2 1 8 4 4 22
10:00 - 11:00
3 2 1 5 7 2 8 28
11:00 - 12:00
3 5 5 5 14 6 6 44
12:00 - 1:00
4 8 0 3 7 5 5 32
1:00 - 2:00
2 2 3 3 6 6 5 27
2:00 - 3:00
1 0 2 0 9 6 5 23
3:00 - 4:00
2 2 0 0 2 1 4 11
TOTAL
17 20 13 20 54 31 40 195
March Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00
2 0 0 1 1 0 4 8
9:00 - 10:00
6 2 2 3 10 0 12 35
10:00 - 11:00
4 2 2 3 4 0 19 34
11:00 - 12:00
7 3 2 3 4 3 11 33
12:00 - 1:00
7 5 4 1 5 1 9 32
1:00 - 2:00
2 1 3 2 1 2 6 17
2:00 - 3:00
2 5 2 0 5 1 10 25
3:00 - 4:00
1 0 0 1 1 2 7 12
TOTAL
31 18 15 14 31 9 78 196
52
April Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00
0 2 4 0 5 2 2 15
9:00 - 10:00
4 5 11 3 14 5 6 48
10:00 - 11:00
3 2 1 3 19 4 5 37
11:00 - 12:00
3 5 8 4 12 4 6 42
12:00 - 1:00
3 5 6 2 6 3 7 32
1:00 - 2:00
2 4 4 3 7 4 1 25
2:00 - 3:00
3 5 3 2 3 2 5 23
3:00 - 4:00
1 0 1 0 2 2 5 11
TOTAL
19 28 38 17 68 26 37 233
May Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00
0 1 0 1 1 2 4 9
9:00 - 10:00
0 1 1 1 2 1 5 11
10:00 - 11:00
0 0 0 0 4 3 3 10
11:00 - 12:00
0 0 0 2 4 2 3 11
12:00 - 1:00
1 0 2 2 1 1 3 10
1:00 - 2:00
0 2 0 0 7 2 0 11
2:00 - 3:00
0 0 0 1 1 5 2 9
3:00 - 4:00
0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
TOTAL
1 4 3 8 20 16 21 73
53
Spring 2014
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday TOTAL
8:00 - 9:00 2 3 6 5 12 6 14 48
9:00 - 10:00 16 15 19 11 39 26 28 154
10:00 - 11:00 14 8 7 12 42 11 42 136
11:00 - 12:00 16 17 17 18 44 22 30 164
12:00 - 1:00 17 22 16 8 26 17 27 133
1:00 - 2:00 7 12 11 9 31 17 17 104
2:00 - 3:00 9 13 8 3 28 17 27 105
3:00 - 4:00 6 6 1 2 8 8 21 52
TOTAL 87 96 85 68 230 124 206 896
Residence Hall Fire Alarms
During the spring 2014 semester there were 38 fire alarms that occurred in the residence halls
that resulted in the fire department being dispatched to the residence halls. Nine (9) of these fire
alarms were for improper cooking (two each in Fletcher and Allyn Halls and one each in
McDowell, Manchester, Leebrick, CCA and Verder Halls).
This is a decrease from the previous spring semester in which there were 66 fire alarms in the
residence halls.
Tri Towers Rotunda Guest Registration
Summary
In the spring 2014 semester there were a total of 202 students who registered a total of 240
guests. Of the 240 guests, 29 were from out-of-state. These out-of-state quests were from 11
different states with a majority (15) coming from PA. By comparison, in spring 2013 there were
228 student hosts with 272 registered guests, of which 35 were from out-of-state.
54
Number of Hosts & Guests Per Hall in Spring 2014
Hall # Hosts # Guests
ALL 3 4
BEA 0 0
CCA 1 2
CCB 3 4
CCC 2 3
CCD 7 10
CCE 7 10
CCF 3 4
CLA 7 7
DUN 3 4
ENG 0 0
FLE 7 7
JOH 1 1
KOO 57 62
KOR 14 21
LAK 1 1
LEE 37 40
MAN 0 0
MCD 3 5
OLS 0 0
PRE 1 1
STO 2 3
VAN 0 0
VER 0 0
WRI 43 51
TOTAL 202 240
Centralized Discipline Overview
Each RHD was assigned between 80 – 90 conduct Child Incident Report cases (exception being
the CCC/D and VER/ENG RHD’s were assigned about 20% fewer cases as they have no ARHD
to assist with their case load) in Advocate during the spring 2014 semester for a total of 1,067
Child IR’s being assigned.
These numbers do not reflect non-conduct type of cases (i.e., flu-like, vandalism, psychological,
EMS, roommate issue/concerns, etc.) nor do they reflect the Spring Break Closing cases that
were inputted into Advocate during Spring Break.
55
Hall Allyn/Clark 86
Beall/McDowell/VanCampen 88
CCA/CCB 80
CCC/CCD 62
CCE/CCF 80
Dunbar/Prentice 87
Fletcher/Manchester 93
Johnson/Stopher 80
Koonce 83
Lake/Olson 81
Leebrick/Korb 90
Verder/Engleman 68
Wright 89
TOTAL 1,067
Alcohol Incidents Called Into Security
In the spring 2014 semester there were 62 incidents involving alcohol (that met our Department’s
definition of a “party”) that were called into Security that required the Assistant Director,
Residential Safety & Security and/or the Coordinator for Security& Security to respond to.
There were 376 people documented in these 62 incidents. The KSUPD were called for 26 (42%)
of these incidents. 71 (19%) people were issued citations by KSUPD for various alcohol
offenses, though most were for prohibitions charges.
These alcohol incidents occurred during the following days of the week in the spring 2014
semester:
Sunday (2); Monday (3); Tuesday (2); Wednesday (0); Thursday (12); Friday (10), and
Saturday (33)
Some point of interest regarding Alcohol incidents listed below:
Allyn Hall – 38% of the students were documented in just one room
Clark Hall – 55% of incidents occurred on the 4th
floor
Koonce Hall – 28% of the incidents occurred on the 7th
floor
Manchester Hall – Incidents only occurred on the 3rd
and 4th
floors, with 60% occurring on the
4th
floor
Prentice Hall – 80% of the incidents occurred on the 3rd
floor
56
Spring 2013 v. 2014 Alcohol Incidents per Hall
Hall Spring 13 Parent IR's
Spring 13 Child IR's
Spring 14 Parent IR's
Spring 14 Child IR's
Allerton 0 0 0 0
Allyn 5 25 10 48
Beall 8 36 5 13
CCA 6 28 6 18
CCB 3 16 2 14
CCC 2 3 1 1
CCD 0 0 5 10
CCE 6 17 1 5
CCF 7 30 7 13
Clark 8 27 11 40
Dunbar 5 15 9 34
Engleman 0 0 0 0
Fletcher 7 35 16 50
Johnson 0 0 0 0
Koonce 13 45 14 65
Korb 5 13 9 32
Lake 10 27 6 25
Leebrick 2 2 1 1
Manchester 6 13 7 47
McDowell 6 16 3 7
Olson 4 5 5 20
Prentice 5 13 10 24
Stopher 2 10 1 1
VanCampen 0 0 1 1
Verder 4 13 7 18
Wright 6 24 7 20
TOTAL 120 413 144 507
Percent Change +20% +23%
57
Spring Break 2014 Closing Violations
Conduct Offense Types Child IR #
Alcohol 16
Controlled Substances 3
Destruction/Misues of Property 17
General Safety 475
Illegal Appliances 49
Misuse of Universty Keys 4
Restroom 7
Residence Hall Policies 15
Visitation 2
Disorderly Conduct 2
Computer Misuse 1
Non-Conduct Offense Types Child IR #
General Issue/Concern 17
Room Entry 8
Damage 2
Facilities Issues/Concerns 2
Illness/Injury 1
Odor of Marijuana 4
Vandalism/Graffiti 6
Odor of Marijuana & Controlled Substances Stats
The chart below represents the total number of controlled substance and odor of marijuana policy
violations that were documented in the residence halls in the spring semester.
Spring 2013
Spring 2014
% Change from '13
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Parent IR's
Child IR's
Odor of Marijuana 143 328
125 260
-13% -21% Controlled Substances 41 86
65 130
59% 51%
The following chart lists a comparison of the number of Odor of Marijuana incidents that
occurred in the residence halls from spring 2013 to spring 2014. Some points of interest are:
Beall Hall – 1/3 of the incidents occurred in just one room
CCD – Both incidents occurred in the same room
Dunbar Hall – All incidents occurred on the 2nd
floor
Koonce Hall – 73% of incidents occurred on the two floors (2nd
and 7th
)
58
Lake Hall – 45% of incidents occurred on the 4th
floor
Leebrick Hall – Two rooms accounted for 50% of all incidents
McDowell Hall – One room accounted for 1/3 of all incidents
Olson Hall – 50% of incidents occurred on 1st floor, with one room accounting for 38% of all
incidents
Prentice Hall – 64% of incidents occurred on the 3rd
floor
Verder Hall – 77% of incidents occurred on 2nd
floor, with just three rooms accounting for 66%
of all incidents, one room was documented eight times
Spring '13 v '14 Odor of Marijuana Incidents
Hall ‘13 Parent IR's ‘13 Child IR's ‘14 Parent IR's ‘14 Child IR's
Allerton 0 0 0 0
Allyn 8 20 2 4
Beall 8 22 12 24
CCA 1 2 6 16
CCB 7 15 0 0
CCC 0 0 0 0
CCD 0 0 2 5
CCE 3 10 2 5
CCF 3 4 4 13
Clark 8 19 2 5
Dunbar 10 21 6 14
Engleman 2 8 0 0
Fletcher 5 13 2 6
Johnson 0 0 0 0
Koonce 25 55 11 22
Korb 3 9 1 4
Lake 16 35 11 21
Leebrick 6 7 8 8
Manchester 9 26 3 7
McDowell 5 8 6 18
Olson 2 3 8 13
Prentice 4 7 11 23
Stopher 0 0 0 0
Van Campen 1 4 0 0
Verder 3 5 18 29
Wright 14 35 10 23
TOTAL 143 328 125 260
% Change -13% -21%
59
The following chart lists a comparison of the number of Controlled Substance incidents that
occurred in the residence halls during spring 2014. Some points of interest are:
CCE – Both incidents occurred on the 1st floor
Dunbar Hall – 86% of the incidents occurred on the 2nd
floor, with one room being documented
twice and one room being documented three times
Leebrick Hall – 43% of the incidents occurred on the 9th
floor
Prentice Hall – 60% of the incidents occurred on the 3rd
floor
Spring ‘14 Controlled Substance Incidents
Hall Parent IR's Child IR's
Allerton 0 0
Allyn 3 16
Beall 7 11
CCA 3 5
CCB 1 4
CCC 1 2
CCD 1 3
CCE 2 4
CCF 1 1
Clark 1 3
Dunbar 7 13
Engleman 0 0
Fletcher 4 12
Johnson 0 0
Koonce 1 1
Korb 2 5
Lake 7 10
Leebrick 7 8
Manchester 1 2
McDowell 2 3
Olson 4 7
Prentice 5 11
Stopher 0 0
Van Campen 0 0
Verder 1 2
Wright 4 7
TOTAL 65 130
60
The following chart represents the total number of incidents that occurred in each residence
hall this past semester and compared to the previous spring semester.
Spring 2013 vs. 2014 Total Number of Conduct Incidents per Hall
Hall Spring 13 Parent IR's
Spring 13 Child IR's
Spring 14 Parent IR's
Spring 14 Child IR's
Allerton 2 3 0 0
Allyn 43 109 30 91
Beall 47 104 14 28
CCA 40 95 40 84
CCB 33 76 25 73
CCC 40 51 29 38
CCD 43 103 34 64
CCE 43 97 30 71
CCF 42 103 29 68
Clark 38 84 43 107
Dunbar 27 54 28 70
Engleman 3 12 10 15
Fletcher 27 83 28 87
Johnson 7 14 26 47
Koonce 98 232 65 199
Korb 49 82 28 69
Lake 54 118 30 86
Leebrick 33 40 20 31
Manchester 36 94 18 69
McDowell 53 91 10 14
Olson 12 21 29 71
Prentice 41 63 53 102
Stopher 9 22 17 38
VanCampen 6 16 1 1
Verder 30 55 15 33
Wright 116 242 51 126
TOTAL 973 2,064 703 1,682
% Change -28% -19%
61
Spring 2014 Conduct Child IR Totals
Conduct Incident Type # of Child IR's
Alcohol 507
Animals 7
Complicity 50
Computer Misuse 1
Controlled Substances 130
Destruction/Misuse of Property 55
Discrimination 22
Disorderly Conduct 61
Escort 133
General Safety 561
Harassment 11
Illegal Appliance 62
Improper Room Change 3
Laws 6
Misrepresentation 8
Misuse of University Keys 75
Physical Violence 9
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 451
Reasonable Request 86
Recording Privacy 3
Residence Hall Policies 3
Restroom 38
Room Capacity 114
Sexual Misconduct 1
Smoking 16
Student Conduct Process 1
Theft 7
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 13
University Rules 2
Visitation 26
Weapons 7
62
A look at what incidents occurred in each hall in Spring
2014 Allyn Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Illegal Appliance 4
Misuse of University Keys 1
Alcohol 48
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 32
Room Capacity 13
Visitation 4
Complicity 14
Controlled Substances 16
Destruction/Misuse of Property 7
Disorderly Conduct 2
General Safety 21
Harassment 1
Laws 1
Misrepresentation 2
Physical Violence 1
Reasonable Request 5
Beall Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Alcohol 13
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 8
Complicity 4
Controlled Substances 11
Destruction/Misuse of Property 1
General Safety 7
Misrepresentation 1
Reasonable Request 11
Theft 1
Centennial Court A
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 10
63
Illegal Appliance 2
Misuse of University Keys 3
Alcohol 18
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 18
Restroom 7
Visitation 2
Controlled Substances 5
Destruction/Misuse of Property 1
Disorderly Conduct 1
General Safety 32
Smoking 1
Theft 1
Centennial Court B
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 3
Misuse of University Keys 5
Alcohol 14
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 33
Room Capacity 23
Complicity 3
Controlled Substances 4
Disorderly Conduct 1
General Safety 21
Centennial Court C
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Illegal Appliance 4
Misuse of University Keys 2
Alcohol 1
Animals 1
Computer Misuse 1
Controlled Substances 2
General Safety 33
Centennial Court D
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 2
64
Illegal Appliance 1
Alcohol 10
Controlled Substances 3
Destruction/Misuse of Property 1
Disorderly Conduct 1
General Safety 54
Theft 1
Centennial Court E
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Illegal Appliance 3
Alcohol 5
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 5
Controlled Substances 4
Disorderly Conduct 1
General Safety 65
Reasonable Request 3
Centennial Court F
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 2
Illegal Appliance 9
Alcohol 13
Controlled Substances 1
Disorderly Conduct 2
General Safety 43
Physical Violence 2
Reasonable Request 4
Smoking 1
University Rules 1
Clark Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 9
Illegal Appliance 6
Misuse of University Keys 7
Alcohol 40
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 22
65
Animals 2
Controlled Substances 3
Destruction/Misuse of Property 10
Disorderly Conduct 7
General Safety 34
Physical Violence 2
Reasonable Request 1
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 2
Dunbar Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 5
Misuse of University Keys 4
Alcohol 34
Improper Room Change 3
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 20
Room Capacity 9
Visitation 4
Complicity 5
Controlled Substances 13
Destruction/Misuse of Property 3
Disorderly Conduct 11
General Safety 13
Reasonable Request 7
Weapons 1
Engleman Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Illegal Appliance 10
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 3
Destruction/Misuse of Property 1
Smoking 1
Fletcher Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Misuse of University Keys 2
Alcohol 50
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 34
66
Restroom 5
Visitation 3
Complicity 3
Controlled Substances 12
Destruction/Misuse of Property 6
Disorderly Conduct 3
General Safety 6
Reasonable Request 6
Smoking 1
Johnson Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Illegal Appliance 2
Disorderly Conduct 1
General Safety 46
Misrepresentation 1
Reasonable Request 1
Weapons 1
Koonce Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 12
Illegal Appliance 2
Alcohol 65
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 98
Animals 1
Restroom 10
Room Capacity 42
Visitation 4
Complicity 15
Controlled Substances 1
Destruction/Misuse of Property 3
General Safety 61
Reasonable Request 4
Student Conduct Process 1
Theft 1
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 1
67
Korb Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 7
Alcohol 32
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 5
Animals 2
Visitation 3
Controlled Substances 5
Destruction/Misuse of Property 1
Disorderly Conduct 1
General Safety 25
Harassment 1
Reasonable Request 3
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 1
Lake Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 21
Illegal Appliance 2
Misuse of University Keys 15
Alcohol 25
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 35
Restroom 8
Room Capacity 6
Controlled Substances 10
Destruction/Misuse of Property 2
Disorderly Conduct 1
General Safety 10
Smoking 9
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 1
Leebrick Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 2
Misuse of University Keys 2
Alcohol 1
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 8
Restroom 3
68
Controlled Substances 8
Disorderly Conduct 2
General Safety 5
Harassment 1
Reasonable Request 1
Recording Privacy 3
Manchester Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 4
Alcohol 47
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 23
Room Capacity 21
Visitation 4
Controlled Substances 2
Destruction/Misuse of Property 11
General Safety 4
Harassment 1
Reasonable Request 16
McDowell Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Alcohol 7
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 4
Complicity 1
Controlled Substances 3
Destruction/Misuse of Property 1
Disorderly Conduct 1
General Safety 3
Reasonable Request 2
University Rules 1
Olson Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 4
Illegal Appliance 7
Misuse of University Keys 2
Alcohol 20
69
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 17
Restroom 2
Controlled Substances 7
Destruction/Misuse of Property 2
Disorderly Conduct 4
General Safety 14
Harassment 1
Reasonable Request 7
Theft 1
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 1
Prentice Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 10
Illegal Appliance 6
Misuse of University Keys 6
Alcohol 24
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 31
Restroom 3
Visitation 2
Complicity 1
Controlled Substances 11
Destruction/Misuse of Property 3
Discrimination 1
Disorderly Conduct 9
General Safety 30
Harassment 2
Laws 1
Misrepresentation 1
Physical Violence 1
Reasonable Request 6
Sexual Misconduct 1
Smoking 2
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 2
Weapons 1
Stopher Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 2
70
Illegal Appliance 2
Misuse of University Keys 4
Alcohol 1
Complicity 4
Disorderly Conduct 4
General Safety 29
Laws 4
Weapons 4
Van Campen Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Alcohol 1
Verder Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Misuse of University Keys 4
Alcohol 18
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 8
Controlled Substances 2
Destruction/Misuse of Property 2
Discrimination 2
Disorderly Conduct 8
General Safety 1
Harassment 3
Physical Violence 3
Reasonable Request 1
Smoking 1
Theft 1
Wright Hall
Incident: Offense Type # of Child IR's
Escort 40
Illegal Appliance 2
Misuse of University Keys 18
Alcohol 20
Quiet/Courtesy Hours 47
Animals 1
Controlled Substances 7
71
Disorderly Conduct 1
General Safety 4
Harassment 1
Misrepresentation 3
Reasonable Request 8
Theft 1
Trespass/Unauthorized Entry 5
Spring 2014 Non- Conduct Child IR Totals
Damage 7
EMS 36
Flu-Like Symptoms 1
Facilities Issues/Concerns/Problem 14
General Issue/Concern 69
Illness/Injury 15
Mental Health Issue/Concern 22
Odor of Marijuana 260
Parent Issue/Concern 1
Room Entry 10
Roommate Issue/Conflict 17
Vandalism/Graffiti 39
72
Brief Summary of Educational Efforts
Alcohol eCHECKUP (Online Alcohol Workshop):
138 students completed the survey, while 130 of those students verified that they had completed
the survey. The survey is live and online and can be completed by anyone, which is why there
may be more students taking the survey than are being assigned to do so.
Demographic information of those who completed eCHECKUP:
Males: 43% Females: 57%
Freshman: 70% Sophomore: 28% Junior: 2%
Greek: 10% Non-Greek: 90%
Athletes: 7% Non-Athletes: 93%
On-Campus: 98% Off-Campus: 2%
Students spent on average about $52.76 per month on alcohol
On average the highest BAC in a typical week for students was 0.11
On the median, students drank 12 beers per month, with males consuming 14 drinks and
females consuming 9 drinks
Additional Information:
For 112 of the students assigned eCHECKUP, this was their first alcohol violation.
18 students had an alcohol policy violation prior to the start of the spring 2014 semester.
After being assigned eCHECKUP…
o 14 students were found in violation of the alcohol policy one more time
o 2 students were found in violation of the alcohol policy two more times
o 2 students were found in violation of the alcohol policy three more times
The recidivism rate was 14% for those students assigned to eCHECKUP
Marijuana eCHECKUP (Online Marijuana Workshop):
New for the Spring 2014 semester, we implemented the Marijuana eCHECKUP online
workshop (similar to the Alcohol eCHECKUP program) for first or second offence odor of
marijuana offenses occurring in the residence halls.
22 students completed the survey. One student was documented a second time for Odor of
Marijuana after completing the Marijuana eCHECKUP, making the recidivism rate at 4.5%.
Demographic information of those who completed Marijuana eCHECKUP:
Males: 59% Females: 41%
Freshmen: 50% Sophomores: 41% Juniors: 9%
73
Greek: 5% Non-Greek: 95%
Athlete: 5% Non-Athlete: 95%
100% lived on-campus
2 ½:: Average DAYS per month students reported to be under the influence
28 ½: Average HOURS per month reported to be under the influence
$76.62: Average spent on MARIJUANA in a typical month
o Males averaged $86.66 and Females averaged $62.11
$48.47: Average spent on ALCOHOL in a typical month
o Males averaged $50.61 and Females averaged $45.39
Parental Notification Letters (PNL):
During the spring semester 94 students were issued Parental Notification Letters (46 from Josette
and 48 from Kim’s area).
Community Billing:
The spring semester saw six separate community billings for the Tri/TW/EW area for a total of
$2,260.44 and two separate billings for the Quad/NF/CC area for a total of $986.36 for a grand
total of $3,246.80 for the spring semester.
Lake Hall – All residents billed for $291.27 in damages on January 17th
Prentice Hall – 3rd
floor residents billed for $695.09 in damages on January 20th
Leebrick Hall – 9th
floor residents billed for $90 in damages on January 28th
Koonce Hall – 2nd
floor residents billed for $170 in damages on January 23rd
Koonce Hall – 10th
floor residents billed for $100 in damages on February 12th
Koonce Hall – 10th
floor residents billed for $382.44 in damages on April 10th
Wright Hall – 3rd
floor residents billed for $600 in damages on March 7th
Korb Hall – All residents billed for $918 in damages on May 20th
Psychological Referral Letters:
During the spring semester there were 16 students issued a Psychological Referral Letter.
10 were from the Tri/Twin/Eastway area, six were from the Quad/NF/CC’s area.
Decision Making and Ethical Workshop (OSC):
Five workshops were scheduled over the course of the spring semester, though the first one in
January was on a “Snow Day”. 12, 12, 10 and 19 students were assigned to each of the four
74
additional workshops respectively for a total of 53 students being assigned to attend. 16 (30%)
students failed to show up for the workshops.
Listing of All Residence Services Sanctions Issued to Students in spring 2014:
Residence Services Sanction Number
RS - Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO 140
RS – Behavioral Contract 9
RS – Community Service 3
RS - Letter of Warning 366
RS - No Sanction Issued 6
RS - Parent/Guardian Notification Letter 134
RS - Reflection Paper - Other 16
RS – Marijuana eCHECKUP TO GO 24
RS – Other 32
RS - Decision Making & Ethics Workshop 12
RS - Reflection Paper on Alcohol Use Among College Students 5
RS - Reflection Paper on Decision Making 21
RS - Reflection Paper on Legal & Professional Consequences of Drug Use 2
RS - Reflection Paper on Responsibilities of Community Members 31
RS - Reflection Project 6
RS - Reflection Questions for Use with eCHECKUP TO GO Program 95
Chemical Dependency Counselor
Service Summary
Fall 2013
Maureen A. Keating PCC-S, LICDC-CS
January 29, 2014
Appendix 6: Chemical Dependency Counselor Service Sumary (2014)
Substance Abuse Services Report – Fall, 2013
Collaborations/Outreach:
In August, Maureen Keating accompanied Dr. Pamela Farer-Singleton to several presentations and
offices throughout the month of August, including the Women’s Center, Residential Services (Residential
Staff), Veteran’s Services, Accessibility Services, and the Multicultural Center. Dr. Singleton-Farer
introduced the Substance Abuse Services in addition to Psychological Services to all of the groups that
requested presentations.
August 15, 2013 Drs. Datta and Farer-Singleton trained 145 RA’s on “How to Assist Students in Distress”.
They introduced the Chemical Dependency counselor and the addition of services at Psych Services.
August 21, 2013 – Dr. Farer-Singleton addressed 250 African American, Latino/a and Native American
Students pm “Staying Balanced During the Transition” and Step Up Speak Out at the request of Trinity
Jeter, Program Coordinator, Student Multicultural Center. She introduced Maureen Keating and the
addition of substance abuse counseling as part of the service package provided by Psychological
Services.
August 22, 2013 Dr. Pamela Farer-Singleton presented SUSO and Psychological Services to new veteran
students and parents as part of the Mandatory GI Bill recipient Orientation 2013. This was requested by
Joshua Rider of center for Adult and Veteran Services. There were approximately 65 participants.
In September, Maureen Keating and Pamela Farer Singleton attended a presentation entitled “The
UnPrison Project: Positive Change for Girls and Women”, sponsored by the Community Health Center.
1.0 CEU was provided.
September 3, 2013 Maureen Keating accompanied Dr. John Schell to a meeting with Student Conduct
Director, Todd Kamenash, to address a specific issue with a student with a serious substance abuse
issue. We also reviewed issues of communication between departments and roles of each department
in supporting student needs.
On September 9, 2013, Maureen Keating accompanied Dr. John Schell to a meeting with Athletic
Services to discuss issues regarding athletes that test positive for illicit substances on urine drug screens.
Dr. Schell worked with Julie Volcheck on fee structures for the athletes. We agreed to assist with
referrals for assessments and educational programming in collaboration with Health Education Services.
Educational Programs
October 31, 2013 5:30pm-8:30pm Presented to Dr. Deric Kenne’s class: Emerging Issues: Drugs & Drug
Policy Course on the Medication Assisted Treatment for Pregnant Women.
November 3, 2013 – 7:00- 8:00pm Presented to 30 members of Phi Kappa Tau fraternity on Alcohol and
Drugs and distributed information about Psych Services and Substance Abuse Treatment available at the
University Health Center.
November 21, 2013 – Attended a regional Heroin Summit presented at Cleveland Clinic, 5.5 CEU’s
received.
Community Meetings Attended
August 15, 2013 – Suicide Prevention – Portage County Mental Health Board
September 11, 2013 and October 9, 2013 – Attended PSAP Alcohol Coalition meeting at Townhall II,
Kent, Ohio
Substance Abuse Meetings and Planning Sessions
8/22/13, 9/3/13, 9/10/13– Sharon Briggs and Maureen Keating met to discuss educational process,
assessments and criteria for referrals
9/16/13, 9/23/13, 9/30/13 – Maureen Keating and Sharon Briggs met with supervisor Dr. John Schell for
supervision and planning regarding SA programming.
10/14, 10/21,10/28,11/4, 11/18, 12/2 and 12/9 – Maureen Keating met with Dr. John Schell regarding
reporting and program planning around substance abuse treatment.
Clients Served (Primary Concern Substance Abuse)
There were 17 students seen by the Chemical Dependency Counselor during this time (1st appointment
in)
September – 8 October – 2 November – 5 December -2 Of the 17 students : 11 were male, 9 Caucasian, African-American , 3 Males age 18, 1 – age 19, 4 age 20, 1 age 22 and 1 age 25 6 students were female – 6 Caucasian, 1 age 19, 3 age 20, 1 age 21, 1 age 22 11 students were referred because of alcohol related issues 5 students were referred for drugs; all 5 were for cannabis related concerns Total Appointments 2 students – 1 8 students – 2 2 students – 4
3 students – 6 1 student – 7
Referral sources: 3 Student Conduct 3 Portage County Probation 1 Athletics 1 Avon Lake Court 1 Berea Adult Probation 1 Newark Ohio Attorney 1 Moore Counseling in Cleveland 3 Student Legal Services 2 Pennsylvania Courts
Fall 2013
M/F Age Appts. Race Other Ref. Dept. SUD Referral SA/SD MHMale 21 1 AA D Student Conduct Yes Yes SD
Male 25 1 C A Ravenna Probation Yes Yes SD
Male 18 6 C D Moore Counseling Yes Yes SD
Female 22 2 C A Student Conduct Yes Yes SA
Female 20 2 C A Legal Services Yes Yes SA MH
Male 18 1 C A Legal Services Yes Yes SA
Male 18 2 AA A/D Kent Muni Court No No SA
Male 19 4 C A PA Court No Yes SA
Male 18 7 C D Medina Court Yes Yes SA
Male 20 4 C A Athletics Yes Yes SD
Female 21 2 C A Kent Muni Court Yes Yes SA MH
Male 19 2 C A Avon Lakes Court Yes Yes SA
Male 20 6 C A Student Conduct Yes Yes SD MH
Female 19 2 C A Kent Muni Court Yes Yes SA
Male 22 2 C D Newark Court Yes No SA
Female 20 6 C A Student Conduct Yes Yes SD
Female 20 2 C A Berea Muni Court Yes Yes SA MI
* All appt. conducted same day due to semester time contraints
TOTALS:
Male: 2 Ages 18 0 Judicial Affairs: 0 Total: 3 Refd: 1SA: 3
Female: 1 19 0 Kent: 0 Yes: 0 UHS: 1SD: 0
20 0 Ravenna: 2 No: 3 Other: 0MH: 2
21 0 Student Legal: 0
22 2 Other: 1
>23 1
Total Individuals: 3
# Sessions 9 1/2014 mk
Appendix 7: Academic Survey Results 2013 & 2014
