dry season aerosol iron solubility in tropical northern australia · 2020. 8. 7. · australia...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Dry season aerosol iron solubility in tropical northern Australia V.H.L. Winton1,a, R. Edwards1, A.R. Bowie2.3, M. Keywood4, A.G. Williams5, S. Chambers5, P.W. Selleck4, M. Desservettaz6, M. Mallet7, C. Paton-Walsh6
1Physics and Astronomy, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia 2Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems CRC, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 5 3Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 4CSIRO, Ocean and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Victoria 5 Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 6Centre for Atmospheric Chemistry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia 7Department of Chemistry, Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 10 Queensland, Australia anow at: British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Correspondence to: V.H.L Winton ([email protected])
Abstract. Marine nitrogen fixation is co-limited by the supply of iron (Fe) and phosphorus in large regions of the global ocean.
The deposition of soluble aerosol Fe can initiate nitrogen fixation and trigger toxic algal blooms in nitrate-poor tropical waters. 15
We present dry season soluble Fe data from the Savannah Fires in the Early Dry Season (SAFIRED) campaign in Northern
Australia that reflects coincident dust and biomass burning sources of soluble aerosol Fe. The mean soluble and total aerosol
Fe concentrations were 40 and 500 ng m-3 respectively. Our results show that while biomass burning species may not be a
direct source of soluble Fe, biomass burning may substantially enhance the solubility of mineral dust. We observed fractional
Fe solubility up to 12 % in mixed aerosols. Thus, Fe in dust may be more soluble in the tropics compared to higher latitudes 20
due to higher concentrations of biomass burning-derived reactive organic species in the atmosphere. In addition, biomass
burning-derived particles can act as a surface for aerosol Fe to bind during atmospheric transport and subsequently be released
to the ocean upon deposition. As the aerosol loading is dominated by biomass burning emissions over the tropical waters in
the dry season, additions of biomass burning-derived soluble Fe could have harmful consequences for initiating nitrogen fixing
toxic algal blooms. Future research is required to quantify biomass burning-derived particle sources of soluble Fe over tropical 25
waters.
Key words
Iron, dust, biomass burning, soluble iron, aerosol, Australia
1 Introduction
The deposition and dissolution of aerosols containing trace metals, such as iron (Fe), into the ocean may provide important 30
micronutrients required for marine primary production in waters where they are depleted, such as the Southern Ocean (e.g.
Boyd et al., 2000). Conversely, the deposition of soluble Fe can trigger toxic algal blooms in nutrient-poor tropical waters
2
(LaRoche and Breitbarth, 2005). In these waters, Fe availability is a primary factor limiting nitrogen fixation (Rueter,
1988;Rueter et al., 1992;Falkowski, 1997;Knapp et al., 2016;Garcia et al., 2015). The addition of bioavailable Fe can influence
inputs of newly fixed nitrogen into surface waters (Paerl et al., 1987;Rueter, 1988). A large fraction of nitrogen fixation is
attributed to the filamentous, nonheterocystous cyanobacteria Trichodesmium (Paerl et al., 1994;Berman-Frank et al., 2001).
Nitrogen fixation by Trichodesmium is Fe-limited in around 75 % of the world oceans (Berman-Frank et al., 2001). Nitrogen 5
fixation has a higher Fe requirement, reflected by higher Fe:C quotas of Trichodesmium that range between 180–214 µmol Fe
mol-1 C (Berman-Frank et al., 2001), compared with other marine phytoplankton, such as diatoms, which have Fe:C quotas
ranging between 1 and 7 µmol mol-1 (Kustka et al., 2003;Johnson et al., 1997;Rueter et al., 1992). Previous studies have
investigated Fe availability as a limiting factor of marine primary production surrounding Australia. High Fe quotas and high
nitrogen fixation rates of Trichodesmium were observed during bloom conditions from coastal waters north of Australia 10
(Berman-Frank et al., 2001). In the oligotrophic waters of the north Tasman Sea, southwest Pacific, a 10-fold increase in
nitrogen fixation was observed after a cyclone. This stimulated diazotrophy by enhanced phosphate availability in the absence
of nitrate, and increased the dissolved Fe supply by wet deposition of Australian dust (Law et al., 2011). Dissolved Fe can also
be supplied to the surface ocean by vertical mixing, hydrothermal inputs and resuspension of marine sediments, in addition to
wet and dry deposition of atmospheric sources (e.g. Tagliabue et al., 2010;Elrod et al., 2004;Mills et al., 2004). 15
Aerosols are an important source of new Fe to the global ocean (Boyd and Ellwood, 2010;Rubin et al., 2011). In tropical
waters, several studies have shown that large toxic algal blooms, such as dinoflagellate Gymnodinium and cyanobacteria, have
been stimulated by atmospheric deposition of nutrients. For example, the deposition of volcanic ash and Saharan dust may
have alleviated the Fe limitation of toxic diazotrophic cyanophytes, thus fuelling nitrogen fixation of red tides in the eastern 20
Gulf of Mexico (Lenes et al., 2008;Walsh and Steidinger, 2001). In addition to mineral dust, biomass burning could be a source
of bioavailable Fe (Guieu et al., 2005;Ito, 2015, 2013) fuelling toxic algal blooms in tropical waters. The mortality of a coral
reef in 1997 in western Sumatra, Indonesia was linked to Fe-fertilisation by Indonesian wildfires causing a giant red tide of
Trichodesmium (Abram et al., 2003).
25
Australia is the primary source of atmospheric dust in the Southern Hemisphere, episodically supplying dust to the Tasman
Sea and Southern Ocean (McTainsh et al., 2005). There are two general dust pathways from the Australian continent to the
ocean (Bowler, 1976;Sprigg, 1982). First, the transport of dust southeast of Australia is associated with easterly-moving frontal
systems within the zonal westerly winds, and its deposition has been observed in marine sediment in the southwest Pacific
Ocean and glaciers in New Zealand (Hesse and McTainsh, 2003;Johnston, 2001;Hesse, 1994;Marx et al., 2005). Second, the 30
transport of dust northwest of Australia is associated with the easterly trade winds. In spite of the ubiquity of aeolian dust in
Australia and the surrounding oceans, there are few studies investigating the composition of the dust on a continental scale.
Some, but not all, Australian dust storms are thought to stimulate phytoplankton blooms (Shaw et al., 2008;Cropp et al.,
2013;Gabric et al., 2010;Mackie et al., 2008). Soluble Fe deposition models indicate that dust and combustion aerosols from
3
the Australian continent can be deposited in other coastal regions of Australia, such as the Indian Ocean and waters north of
Australia (Ito, 2015;Mahowald et al., 2005). Studies from ice cores show that Australian dust and refractory black carbon
(rBC), a proxy for biomass burning, can be transported long-range to Antarctica (Revel-Rolland et al., 2006;De Deckker et al.,
2010;Bisiaux et al., 2012).
5
The fractional solubility of aerosol Fe is an important variable determining Fe availability for biological uptake. On a global
scale, the large variability in the observed fractional Fe solubility results, in part, from a mixture of aerosol sources. Most
studies assume that mineral dust aerosols represent the primary source of soluble Fe in the atmosphere (e.g. Baker and Croot,
2010). Mineral dust has a low fractional Fe solubility (~0.5-2 %), whereas the presence of other soluble Fe sources, such as
those originating from biomass burning and oil combustion have a higher fractional Fe solubility (Chuang et al., 2005;Guieu 10
et al., 2005;Sedwick et al., 2007;Schroth et al., 2009;Ito, 2011). Although the total Fe content of fresh biomass burning aerosols
is small, around 0.01 to 1.2 % (Maenhaut et al., 2002;Yamasoe et al., 2000;Reid et al., 2005), estimates of fractional Fe
solubility from fire combustion are large and variable (1-60 %). This large variability may be related to characteristics of the
biomass, and fire as well as that of the underlying terrain (Ito, 2011;Paris et al., 2010). Ito (2015) shows that biomass burning-
derived soluble Fe contributes substantial inputs of soluble Fe to tropical and Southern Ocean waters downwind of Australia. 15
Biomass burning could be an important source of soluble Fe to both tropical and Southern Ocean waters surrounding Australia.
Austral dry season rBC emissions in the Southern Hemisphere primarily occur in the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ)
of Africa, Australia and South America (Giglio et al., 2013). In Australia, biomass burning constitutes a large source of dry
season aerosol emissions over northern and central Australia, and episodic austral summer wild fire in southern and eastern 20
Australia (e.g. Meyer et al., 2008). In northern Australia, the dry season occurs from May/June (early dry season) to October-
November (late dry season) (Andersen et al., 2005). To date, data for Australian soluble aerosol Fe sources is sparse (e.g.
Mackie et al., 2008;Mackie et al., 2005), and no soluble aerosol Fe data exists for Australia fire sources. The dry season tropical
savannah burning region in northern Australian provides an ideal location to investigate biomass burning-derived fractional
Fe solubility at the source. This study reports fractional Fe solubility estimates of mixed dust and fresh biomass burning (black 25
carbon-containing particles) derived Fe input to north Australian waters. The study was conducted as part of the Savannah
Fires in the Early Dry Season (SAFIRED) campaign from the Australian Tropical Atmospheric Research Station (ATARS),
Gunn Point, Northern Territory, Australia.
2. Methods
2.1. Study site 30
The CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere and the Australian Bureau of Meteorology has established a station at the ATARS, Gunn
Point, Northern Territory, Australia (12°14'56.6"S, 131°02'40.8"E) (Fig. 1) monitoring meteorological parameters since 2010.
4
The SAFIRED campaign occurred at the ATARS throughout June 2014 to investigate the chemical and physical properties of
aerosols and gases in fresh and aged smoke plumes from biomass burning. A range of atmospheric species including
greenhouse gases, aerosols, and additional meteorological parameters were monitored throughout the campaign. An overview
of the campaign and description of the Gunn Point study site can be found in Mallet et al. (submitted). The Northern Territory
of Australia experiences hot, humid and wet conditions during the summer months of December through to March, and dry 5
conditions for the rest of the year. The savannah region gives rise to frequent fires between June and November. The large
desert regions of central Australia lie to the south. During the sampling campaign, the strongest winds were predominantly
from the southeast (Fig. 1).
2.2. Sampling and blanks
Daily aerosol filters were collected using two Volumetric Flow Controlled (VFC) high-volume aerosol samplers (Ecotech) 10
equipped with particulate matter less than 10 µm (PM10) size selective inlets (Ecotech). The samplers were operated
simultaneously. The first high-volume sampler was used to collect aerosols on acid cleaned cellulose Whatman 41 filter sheets
(20 x 25 cm) to determine the soluble and total fraction of aerosol Fe and other trace elements. The second sampler was used
to collect aerosol samples on quartz filters for elemental carbon and major cation and anion measurements. The high-volume
aerosol samplers were located on the roof of a shipping container (at a height of 5 m above ground level (agl)) at the ATARS. 15
Loading and changing of aerosol collection substrates was carried out in a designated clean area at the ATARS. Aerosol laden
filters were transferred into the individual zip-lock plastic bags immediately after collection and stored frozen until analysis at
Curtin University and CSIRO Ocean and Atmosphere. A total of 23 trace metal aerosol filters were sampled daily between 4
and 27 June 2014 and are described in Table S1.
20
For the trace element work, three types of filter blanks were carried out; i) laboratory filter blanks (n=6) (acid-washed Whatman
41 filter papers that underwent the laboratory procedures without going into the field), ii) procedural filter blanks (n=4) (filters
that had been treated as for normal samples, i.e., acid-washed, but which were not otherwise used. Once a week, during daily
filter change over, a procedural blank filter was mounted in the aerosol collector for 10 minutes without the collector pump in
operation. This type of filter provides an indication of the operational blank associated with the sampling procedure), and iii) 25
24-hour exposure filter blanks sampled at the beginning and end of the field campaign (n=2) (filters treated like a procedural
blank, but left it in the collector for 24-hours without switching the collector on). Exposure blank filters for the elemental
carbon and major ion measurements were run simultaneously with the trace element exposure blank filters.
2.3. Trace element analysis
All sample preparation and analysis for the trace element work was conducted in a trace metal clean laboratory (class 100 30
metal-free environment with high-efficiency particulate arrestance (HEPA) filtered air) at Curtin University following trace
5
metal clean practices (e.g. Cutter et al., 2010). Details for ultra-pure reagents, ultra-pure water, acid-washing of apparatus and
Whatman 41 filters and filter sub-sampling are described in Winton et al. (2016a).
2.3.1. Water solubility of aerosol iron
There are a number of published methods for determining iron solubility, and a number of operational definitions of iron
solubility. The discrepancy in soluble Fe methods, and the associated uncertainties, makes it difficult to compare results from 5
different studies (Meskhidze et al., 2016). Although there are few estimates of soluble Fe in Australian dust and aerosols, for
consistency we use the instantaneous water leaching scheme that was used in the Australian studies (Winton et al.,
2016a;Winton et al., 2015). It is widely reported in the literature that soluble Fe concentration of aerosols decrease
exponentially with subsequent leaches (e.g. Wu et al., 2007;Fishwick et al., 2014;Aguilar-Islas et al., 2010). To determine how
many leaches were required to extract the concentration of instantaneous soluble Fe from our samples, we carried out a 10
sequential leach test on sample GP5 using 10 passes of 50 mL ultra-pure water. Leachates were collected in acid-washed
polypropylene (PP) Corning® tubes and acidified with 1 % ultra-pure HCl. The experiment was repeated three times using
three separate punches from the same filter sample. The exponential decrease in the soluble Fe concentration is illustrated in
Fig. S2, and shows an exponential decrease in soluble Fe extraction with successive leaches. Even after 1 L of ultra-pure water
was passed through the aerosol filter, soluble Fe was still being extracted. Therefore, soluble elements (Al, Ti, V, Mn, Fe, Pb) 15
were extracted from the Gunn Point filters using an instantaneous flow-through water leach consisting of 20 separate passes
of 50 mL of ultra-pure water. A total volume of 1000 mL was filtered through each aerosol filter. We acknowledge that beyond
20 leaches, soluble Fe could continue to leach out of the aerosols. Thus, the data reported here reflect “instantaneous” soluble
Fe and may underestimate the total concentration of soluble Fe over greater leach volumes.
20
Soluble elements were extracted from aerosol filters (GP1-23), exposure blanks (EB1-2), and procedural blanks (PB1-4).
Figure 2 highlights the percentage of soluble Fe in each leach. Similar to other studies of instantaneous soluble Fe (e.g. Boyd
et al., 2010), around half of the soluble Fe is extracted in the first leach. Following the test on sample GP5, only leaches 1-4,
6, 10 and 20 were collected and analysed. The concentration of the unanalysed leachates 5, 7-8 and 11-19 was estimated by
fitting a power law curve to the soluble Fe concentration in leachates 1-4, 6, 10 and 20 for each sample. Total soluble Fe (and 25
trace elements) was calculated by summing the soluble Fe concentration extracted from 20 leaches. The leachates from sample
GP22 (as an example of sample with a particularly high soluble Fe concentration) were re-filtered through 0.2 µm acid-cleaned
Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) syringe filters to calculate the <0.2 µm soluble Fe fraction of the total soluble Fe. The
concentration of soluble Fe in the <0.2 µm fraction of the leachate contained 70 % of the total soluble Fe in GP22 and follows
the same exponential decreases with successive leaches. Leachates showed a large variability in their colour, and visual 30
observation after particle settling showed that they contained a large number of very fine particles even in the <0.2 µm fraction.
Blank concentrations for exposure blank and procedural blank filters averaged ~0.4 ± 0.06 ng g-1 and 0.5 ± 0.01 ng g-1 of
soluble Fe respectively.
6
2.3.2. Total trace element concentrations
Total PM10 trace element (Na, Al, K, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Mo, Pb, As) concentrations were determined following
recommendations from the 2008 GEOTRACES intercalibration experiment for the analysis of marine aerosols (Morton et al.,
2013). Details for HNO3 and HF acid digestion of filter samples and certified reference materials (MESS-3 marine sediment,
National Research Council, Canada, and QC-TMFM-A spiked trace metals (1-10 µg of trace metal per filter) on nitrocellulose 5
filter (TMF), High Purity Standards) can be found in Winton et al. (2016a). Recovery rates for elements are reported in Table
S2. Blank concentrations for Savillex® digestion beakers, exposure blank, procedural blank and laboratory blank filters
averaged ~4 ± 3 ng g-1 (n=3), ~150 ± 8 ng g-1 (n=2), ~140 ± 30 ng g-1 (n=4), and ~140 ± 90 ng g-1 (n=6) of total Fe respectively.
The non-sea salt-potassium (nss-K) fraction of total K was obtained by subtracting the contribution of sea salt derived K from
the measured K concentrations (nss-K = K -0.037 x Na; where Na and K are the measured concentrations in aerosol samples 10
and 0.037 is the K/Na ratio in sea-salt (Keene et al., 1986).
2.3.3. High-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis
Leachates and resuspended total digests were analysed by high-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (HR-
ICP-MS, Element XR ThermoFisher) at Curtin University following Winton et al. (2016a). All samples and standards were
prepared on a similar matrix basis. During the course of the sample sequence, an EPA standard (Cat. #ICP-200.7-6 Solution 15
A, High Purity Standards) was measured regularly for quality control. Laboratory vial blanks, also measured regularly during
the course of the sample sequence, were determined by carrying out identical analytical procedures as the leachates but vials
were filled with ultra-pure water rather than the leachate. Leachate concentrations were corrected for laboratory blanks, and
the total digest concentrations corrected for the Savillex® digestion beaker blanks. Measured trace elements and the spectral
resolutions, along with typical operating conditions, are reported in Table S3. 20
2.4. Air mass back trajectories
To identify the source region of air masses arriving at Gunn Point, we used hourly 5-day (120-hr) back trajectories (ending at
12 m agl) to reconstruct atmospheric circulation leading up to, and during, individual events. Air mass back trajectories were
produced using the ‘Trajectory program’ based on the NOAA ARL HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory
(HYsplit) model (Draxler and Rolph, 2003) (http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php). Global Data Assimilation System 25
model files (GDAS) obtained from NOAA ARL FTP (http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/gdas1.php) were used to drive the model. The
resolution used was 0.5 degrees.
2.5. Radon concentrations
Natural radioactive noble gas radon-222 (radon) is a useful quantitative indicator of diurnal to synoptic scale mixing processes
within the continental lower troposphere (Chambers et al., 2015), and a suitable tracer for continental air (e.g. Dörr et al., 30
7
1983). This is because radon has a half-life of 3.8 days and only one source and sink i.e. radon is solely produced from terrestrial
surfaces and is lost from the atmosphere by radioactive decay. The ANSTO-built 700 L dual-flow-loop two-filter radon
detector (e.g. Whittlestone and Zahorowski, 1998;Chambers et al., 2014) samples air from 12 m above ground level (a.g.l.). A
coarse aerosol filter and dehumidifier are installed “upstream” of the detector, as well as a 400 L delay volume to ensure that
thoron (220Rn, half-life 55 s) concentrations in the inlet air stream are reduced to less than 0.5 % of their ambient values. The 5
detector’s response time is around 45 minutes, and its lower limit of determination is 40-50 mBq m-3. Calibrations are
performed on a monthly basis by injecting radon from a PYLON 101.15 ± 4 % kBq Ra-226 source (12.745 Bq min-1 222Rn),
traceable to NIST standards, and instrumental background is checked every 3 months. The time series from the Gunn Point
campaign has been separated into: a) advective contributions (essentially afternoon-to-afternoon interpolated values, reflecting
the air mass fetch history over the last two weeks), and b) diurnal variability (the residual, indicative of change in mixing 10
depth) following the method of Chambers et al. (2015).
2.6. Oxalate and levoglucosan
Oxalate and levoglucosan measurements were performed on the PM10 quartz filters at CSIRO Ocean and Atmosphere. The
filters were Pall Tissuquartz filters p/n 7204, baked at 600 °C for 4-8 hours before use and stored frozen after sampling until
analysis. A 6.25 cm2 section was cut out of the filter and extracted in 5 mL of ultra-pure water. The quartz filter extracts were 15
analysed for major water soluble ions by suppressed ion chromatography (IC) and for anhydrous sugars, including
levoglucosan, by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD)
(Iinuma et al., 2009;Hibberd et al., 2013). Three exposure blanks were analysed alongside the sample filters. The oxalate blank,
calculated using an average collection volume of 1575 m3, was 0.0009 µg m-3 with a method detection limit (MDL) of 0.0002
µg m-3. While levoglucosan had no detectable blank with a MDL of 0.00002 µg m-3. All sample concentrations were blank 20
corrected.
2.7. Elemental carbon
Elemental carbon analysis was performed on the PM10 quartz filters at CSIRO Ocean and Atmosphere using a DRI Model
2001A Thermal-Optical Carbon Analyser following the IMPROVE-A temperature protocol (Chow et al., 2007). We note that
the difference in the terminology of black carbon versus elemental carbon in the literature reflects the characteristics of 25
carbonaceous matter and the analytical method employed (Andreae and Gelencsér, 2006;Petzold et al., 2013;Bond et al., 2013).
The terminology used here follows that recommended by Petzold et al. (2013), i.e., the term “black carbon” is used qualitatively
when referring to material that shares some of the characteristics of black carbon (carbonaceous composition combined with
light-absorbing properties); “elemental carbon” refers to data derived from methods that are specific to the carbon content of
carbonaceous matter using thermal desorption methods; “refractory black carbon” (rBC) is used instead of black carbon for 30
measurements derived from incandescence methods; while mixed particles containing black carbon are referred to as “black
8
carbon-containing particles.” The data reported in this study was analysed using thermal desorption methods and is referred to
as elemental carbon.
3. Results
3.1. Air mass back trajectories
We identified predominate fetch regions that gave rise to particular events; a) ‘inland, low population density,’ b) ‘coastal, 5
moderate urban/industrial activity,’ c) ‘major urban/industrial activity,’ and d) ‘southerly.’ The mean trajectory for each group
was calculated and these representative trajectories are indicated in Fig. 1.
3.2. Biomass burning events during the campaign
The campaign was heavily influenced by thousands of proximal wild and prescribed bushfires (Milic et al., 2016). A number
of biomass burning markers were used to identify major burn events during the campaign, including carbon monoxide (CO), 10
levoglucosan, oxalate, and elemental carbon (Figs. 3-6) (Milic et al., 2016; Desservettaz et al., submitted; Mallet et al.,
submitted). Nine burn events were identified, with three intense episodes occurring on the 9 June (fire event “E”), 25 June (fire
event “FG”) and 26-27 June 2014 (fire event “HI) (see Desservettaz et al., submitted for a description of the fire events).
Smoke transported to the ATARS during fire event “E” comprised of both distally sourced fires, i.e., >200 km, and locally
sourced fires, i.e., within 5 km (Mallet et al., submitted). Fire locations were obtained from the Sentinel Hotspot system 15
(MODIS and VIIRS satellites) (Milic et al., 2016). Whereas, the source of emissions for the largest fire events “FG” and “HI”
were proximal, i.e., within 10 km of the ATARS. These high intensity fire events were accompanied by smouldering burning
conditions that resulted in high organic loadings and high levoglucosan concentrations. Due to the different time periods the
CO data (minute) and aerosol samples (daily) integrate, we have grouped fire events “F” and “G” into one event (fire event
“FG”) and “H” and “I” into another event (fire event “HI”) for this study. In addition, concentrations of nss-K and nss-K 20
normalised relative to other elemental concentration are good indicators of biomass burning (Yamasoe et al., 2000;Maenhaut
et al., 2002). There is good agreement between nss-K concentrations and CO (r2=0.55) (Fig. S1). There is also a good
correlation between nss-K and elemental carbon concentrations (r2=0.74) (Fig. S1). Following Guieu et al. (2005), we
normalise nss-K to Fe and compare the ratio to crustal aerosols (nss-K/Fe=0.49; Wedepohl (1995)) and polluted aerosols (nss-
K/Fe=0.27; urban particulate matter - standard reference #1648, NIST). During the campaign the nss-K/Fe ratio ranged 25
between 0.2-4.9. This relativity large range was similar to nss-K/Fe of 0.63-1.8 for Mediterranean summer fires in 2003 (Guieu
et al., 2005), nss-K/Fe of 2.0 for biomass burning aerosols for the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal (Srinivas et al., 2012),
and nss-K/Fe of 0.51 for the West African Sahel biomass burning (Paris et al., 2010). These studies suggested that the higher
ratio reflected a primarily fire origin for nss-K. The nss-K/Fe ratio was especially high during the three fire events in this study
(nss-K/Fe ~4) and during high elemental carbon concentrations between 21-27 June (nss-K/Fe~2.2), compared to non-fire 30
events (nss-K/Fe ~1.3). Even the lowest nss-K/Fe of 1.3 during the campaign is particularly high compared to crustal aerosols.
9
This relatively high ratio suggests that even at times when there are no major fire events, background biomass burning during
Australian dry season is a stronger emitter of K, than of Fe, and emits relatively little other trace elements.
3.3. Trace element mass concentrations
Total and soluble PM10 trace element concentrations are illustrated in Figs. 3-5. Total PM10 aerosol Fe ranges from 60-1164
ng m-3, while soluble aerosol Fe ranges from 7-141 ng m-3. A strong linear correlation was found between the total PM10 trace 5
elements of Fe, Al, V and Ti, i.e., total Fe and total Al (r2=0.96), total Fe and total Ti (r2=0.98), and total Fe and total V
(r2=0.99) (Figs. 3 and S3). Likewise, a strong linear correlation between the soluble trace elements of Fe, Al, and Ti was found
during the campaign (Figs. 5 and Fig. S3), i.e., soluble Fe and soluble Al (r2=0.97), and soluble Fe and soluble Ti (r2=0.86).
There is considerable temporal variability in soluble and total trace elements throughout the campaign. Two distant events in
soluble Al, Ti, and Fe and total Al, Ti, V, and Fe are observed on the 7-8 June 2014 (GP4-5; 78-141 ng m-3 of soluble Fe and 10
1158-1164 ng m-3 of total Fe), and 14-15 June 2014 (GP11-12; 52-92 ng m-3 of soluble Fe and 677-928 ng m-3 of total Fe)
(Figs. 3 and 5). On the 20 June 2014, high concentrations of these crustal-like elements (total and soluble Al, Ti, V, Fe) were
also observed (GP17; 67 ng m-3 of soluble Fe and 1129 ng m-3 of total Fe) and are associated with coastal air masses (Fig. 1;
trajectory type “b”). Total Cr, As, Mo, V, and Na also peaked during coastal conditions (Fig. 5). During the fire event “E” on
9 June, total As, Mn, Pb concentrations were high (Fig. 4). 15
3.4. Dry deposition iron flux
Estimates of the Fe dry deposition rate (Fdry) to adjacent north Australian surface waters were calculated using Eq. (1), and the
total and soluble Fe concentrations (Caerosol) reported from this study. We apply a dry deposition velocity (Vdry) of 2 cm s-1 for
coastal areas (Duce et al., 1991) following Baker et al. (2003) for aerosols collected along a transect in the Atlantic Ocean and
Baker et al. (2007) for the atmosphere over the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Estimates of Fe dry deposition rates for Gunn Point 20
aerosols are reported in Table 1.
𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 = 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑥𝑥 𝑉𝑉𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑑𝑑𝑎𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑎𝑎𝑑𝑑 (1)
4. Discussion
4.1. Iron mass concentrations
The soluble Fe concentrations of 7-141 ng m3 at Gunn Point are less than soluble Fe concentrations reported in smoke from 25
the Mediterranean and West African Sahel (350 ng m3) (Guieu et al., 2005) and (130 ng m3) (Paris et al., 2010) respectively.
There is sparse total and soluble aerosol Fe concentration data for Australian aerosols, however our estimates (60-1160 ng m3;
Fig. 3) agree with reported total Fe concentrations at Jabiru, northern Australia (148 ng m-3), at Sydney, New South Wales
(150 ng m-3) and modelled values for the north Australia coastal area (200-1000 ng m-3) (Mahowald et al., 2009; and references
10
within). Compared to aerosol Fe from other tropical regions, our total Fe estimates from Australia are in good agreement with
biomass burning aerosol studies reported from the Alta Floresta, Amazon Forest, Brazil between 1996-1998, which range from
300 to 1200 ng m-3 of total Fe (Maenhaut et al., 2002). Total Fe concentrations decrease from the source to the open ocean e.g.
aerosol Fe concentrations reported for the tropical Atlantic open ocean range from 6 to 56 ng m-3 for total Fe and 6 to 28 ng
m-3 for soluble Fe (Baker et al., 2006). 5
4.2. Dry deposition estimates of soluble and total iron
Estimates of soluble and total PM10 Fe dry deposition fluxes are reported in Table 1 and range from 0.2 ± 0.4 to 4 ± 9 µmol
m-2 d-1 for soluble Fe and 2 ± 4 to 36 ± 72 µmol m-2 d-1 for total PM10 Fe. The dry deposition Fe estimates for air over Gunn
Point are compared to other aerosol studies from the Southern Hemisphere and tropical regions. The mean soluble Fe dry
deposition flux (~1 µmol m-2 d-1) is greater than soluble Fe dry deposition fluxes over open ocean tropical Atlantic waters 10
(0.01-0.1 µmol m-2 d-1) (Baker et al., 2003). The estimates at Gunn Point are also higher than those reported for the Southern
Ocean, for example, 0.002-0.007 µmol m-2 d-1 reported by Bowie et al. (2009), 0.001-0.003 µmol m-2 d-1 reported by Wagener
et al. (2008), 0.002-0.007 µmol m-2 d-1 reported by Baker et al. (2013) for the South Atlantic, and 0.001-0.007 µmol m-2 d-1 for
baseline air over the Southern Ocean reported by Winton et al. (2015). Estimates of total PM10 Fe dry deposition fluxes at
Gunn Point are higher than those for the Southern Ocean (0.001-0.12 µmol m-2 d-1) (Winton et al., 2015) and the South Atlantic 15
(0.1–0.3 µmol m-2 d-1) (Baker et al., 2013). The Gunn Point data are in good agreement with estimates from global models for
the north Australia coastal region. Mahowald et al. (2009) estimates total Fe deposition in north Australia to be 0.04-1 g m-2
y-1, and our mean total PM10 Fe flux of 0.3 g m-2 y-1 falls within this range.
4.3. Fractional iron solubility
The fractional Fe solubility ranged from 2 % to 12 % during the study (Figs. 6 and 7). These estimates are within the 0.6 to 40 20
% range of fractional Fe solubility reported for biomass burning (Paris et al., 2010;Bowie et al., 2009;Ito, 2011;Ito, 2015;Guieu
et al., 2005). Fractional Fe solubility was highest between 4 and 20 June with a mean fractional Fe solubility of 10 ± 2 %. After
20 June, the fractional Fe solubility dropped to 3 ± 1 % between the 21 and 27 June when fires were proximal to the ATARS.
These trends in fractional Fe solubility over the campaign are not unique to Fe; the variation of fractional Al and Ti solubility
paralleled that of fractional Fe solubility (Fig. 6). During dust event “A” (see Section 4.5.1) fractional Fe solubility peaked at 25
~12 %, fractional Al solubility at ~14 %, and fractional Ti solubility at ~5 % (Fig. 6). Fractional Al and Ti solubility also
decreased on 24 June from 10 ± 2 % to 3 ± 1 % for Al and from 6 ± 2 % to 2 ± 1 % for Ti (Fig. 6). On the other hand, fractional
Mn solubility was relatively high and constant throughout the campaign and averaged ~72 ± 11 %. The factors that regulate
fractional Fe solubility in these samples may also regulate the solubility of Al and Ti but not Mn.
30
A synthesis of global aerosol Fe solubility data sets, complied by Sholkovitz et al. (2012), displayed an inverse hyperbolic
relationship between the total Fe concentration and fractional Fe solubility (Fig. 7). This characteristic relationship is common
11
over large regions of the global ocean, and has been attributed to the mixing of mineral dust with a low Fe solubility and other
soluble Fe aerosols from combustion sources (e.g. Sedwick et al., 2007). We have plotted the Gunn Point aerosol Fe data with
the Southern Hemisphere compilation in Fig. 7. Our data sits within two clusters i) moderate fractional Fe solubility and high
total PM10 aerosol Fe loading between the 4 and 19 June and ii) low fractional Fe solubility and moderate total PM10 aerosol
Fe loading between the 21 and 26 June (highlighted in Fig. 7). The inverse hyperbolic relationship presented by Sholkovitz et 5
al. (2012) is different to that presented here, i.e., the lower fractional Fe solubility in the second cluster is associated with
proximal fires (Fig. 7). Aged versus fresh combustion Fe can illuminate this discrepancy and we discuss this in Section 4.6.4.
4.4. Enrichment factor analysis
Crustal enrichment factors (EFs) were calculated using the Wedepohl (1995) compilation of the continent crust to determine
the contribution of mineral dust to the observed total elemental concentrations. Total Ti was used as a marker for mineral dust. 10
For an element (Z) in a sample, the EF relative to Ti is calculated using Eq. (2).
𝐸𝐸𝐹𝐹 = (𝑍𝑍/𝑇𝑇𝑑𝑑)𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠
(𝑍𝑍/𝑇𝑇𝑑𝑑)𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑠𝑠𝑐𝑐 (2)
The EFs of Gunn Point filters are used to aid our interpretation of mineral dust versus other aerosol sources. We recognise
limitations of using EFs for this purpose, such as whether the reference material (Ti) is representative of mineral dust in the
atmosphere compared to the crust (Reimann and Caritat, 2000;Arimoto et al., 1989). The majority of EFs in Table 2 are low, 15
i.e., EF<5. Enrichment factors in this range are similar to the upper continental crust, suggesting that these trace metals might
have originated from that source (Duce et al., 1983;Gelado‐Caballero et al., 2012). Aerosol Fe has an EF between 0.9 and 1.3
and does not show Fe enrichment. The low EFs imply that biomass burning is a relatively unimportant source of Fe in this
study. However, the low values can be explained by processes, such as entrainment of fine soil particles into flames and smoke
plumes, that could add Fe to the aerosol. This indirect contribution of Fe aerosol could be significant. 20
4.5. Aerosol sources
Based on a combination of radon, air mass trajectories, enrichment factor analysis and biomass burning markers, trace elements
have been grouped into three sources: dust, biomass burning and coastal sources.
4.5.1. Dust events
Dust events “A” and “B” are characterised by peaks in total PM10 Al, Ti, Fe and V, and correspond to low diurnal radon, i.e., 25
when conditions are well mixed (Fig. 3). During these two dust events, air mass back trajectories corresponded to times when
the air mass passed over central Australian desert, i.e., dust event “A”: trajectory type “c,” and dust event “B”: trajectory type
“d,” (Fig. 1). Enrichment factors of Al (EF of 0.6-0.7), V (EF of 1.8-2.0) and Fe (EF of 1.0-1.1) during these two dust events
suggest that these trace metals have a similar composition to the upper crust, i.e., EF between 0.7 and 2, and thus most likely
originate from crustal material. Soluble concentrations of Fe, Al, Ti, Mn and V were high during dust events “A” and “B”. 30
12
Fractional Fe solubility was highest in dust event “A” (12 %). Factors that influence fractional Fe solubility in mixed biomass
burning and mineral dust sources are discussed in Section 4.6).
4.5.2. Coastal conditions
On the 20 June 2014 coastal conditions were identified by a decrease in aerosol particle counts and a change in the particle
size distribution from unimodal to bimodal with modes at 20 nm and 70 nm (Mallet et al., submitted). During these conditions, 5
total Na reached 3.1 µg m-3 and the Na/Mg ratio was similar to seawater which is indicative of sea spray (Fig. 3). The Na signal
was greater during times of low advective radon, i.e. when air masses were predominantly spending less time over land and
more time over ocean regions. Total PM10 Al, Ti, Fe, and V peaked during these conditions. There was a moderate rise in
soluble Al, Ti and Fe. Enrichment factors for Al, V and Fe during coastal conditions show that these trace metals have a similar
composition to the upper crust (i.e., EF 0.7-2) and might originate from crustal material. Fractional Fe solubility was ~6 % in 10
the coastal air mass. During these conditions, there were also high concentrations of total PM10 Mo, Cr and As (Fig. 4). Small
emissions of these three trace elements come from natural and anthropogenic sources (Lane et al., 2013;Pacyna and Nriagu,
1988). Back trajectories passed over coastal regions of moderate urban activity, i.e., trajectory type “b” (Fig. 1), suggesting
that air masses could have contained a mixture of dust and minor anthropogenic derived aerosols.
4.5.3. Fire events 15
The discussion of aerosol Fe during fire events focusses on the three major events occurring on the 9 June (fire event “E”), 25
June (fire event “FG”) and 26-27 June 2014 (fire event “HI”) (Desservettaz et al., submitted). These events were identified
from large enhancements in CO and aerosol mass concentrations over the usual levels for the campaign (Desservettaz et al,
submitted). Concentrations of non-refractory particulate matter less than 1 µm (PM1) increased up to 500 µg m-3 (Mallet et al.,
submitted). During fire events “FG” and “HI”, total PM10 Fe (400-800 ng m-3) and soluble Fe (7-66 ng m-3) concentrations 20
and fractional Fe solubility (~3 %) were considerably less than the average concentration and fractional solubility throughout
the campaign. For the first half of the campaign, from 4-20 June, fractional Fe solubility averaged 10 % and then dropped to
~3 % between 21-27 June. During the drop in fractional Fe solubility, soluble and total PM10 Fe concentrations were the
lowest found throughout the campaign.
25
We compare the fractional Fe solubility to biomass burning proxies during the campaign. There is no significant relationship
between fractional Fe solubility and the biomass burning tracers (nss-K, elemental carbon, oxalate or levoglucosan) throughout
campaign (Fig. S2). Nevertheless, fractional Fe solubility is typically lower when elemental carbon concentrations are high,
excluding dust event “A” (r2=0.33). The period of low fractional Fe solubility ~3 %, between the 21-27 June, encompasses the
exceptionally large fire events “FG” and “HI.” Biomass burning was most intense during this second half of the campaign. In 30
agreement with high concentrations of elemental carbon, oxalate and levoglucosan at this time, visual examination the aerosol
filters showed that between the 21-27 June, filters were exceptionally caked with soot. The lowest fractional Fe solubility
13
during fire event “FG” and “HI” is related to proximal fires, whilst the fractional Fe solubility was relatively high during fire
event “E” when fires were distantly sourced.
4.6. Biomass burning-derived soluble iron - combustion and transport
During the large burning events in this study, fresh elemental carbon is an insignificant source of soluble Fe to the aerosol;
fresh elemental carbon has a relatively low Fe solubility (Ito, 2015), it is initially hydrophobic (e.g. Chughtai et al., 1996) and 5
it contains relatively little Fe (e.g. Maenhaut et al., 2002). However, biomass burning can indirectly influence the fractional Fe
solubility of aerosols through physical processes, such as the entrainment of local soil particles into the smoke plume, black
carbon containing particles acting as a substrate for long-range aerosol Fe transport, and the fine particle size of biomass
burning-derived particles. In addition, chemical processes, such as oxalate modification and aerosol aging, may also impact
fractional Fe solubility in biomass burning plumes. The low fractional Fe solubility of ~3 % during periods of high elemental 10
carbon, oxalate and levoglucosan concentrations could be related to the entrainment of fine soil particles into the smoke plume
during intensive fires. The incorporation of local dust into the aerosol explains the low EFs and elevated nss-K ratios during
the largest fire events. Back trajectories and radon also show that mineral dust was sourced from central Australian desert. The
fractional Fe solubility at this time is similar to dust estimates around 0.5-2 % at relatively high Fe mass concentrations
(Sholkovitz et al., 2012). 15
4.6.1. Aggregation of particles during atmospheric transport
Iron can be bound to long-range transportable black carbon-containing particle aggregates deposited in Antarctic snow and ice
(Ellis et al., 2015). Little is known about the process in which Fe is bound to black carbon-containing particle aggregates. Iron
could originate from Fe contained within the biomass (Maenhaut et al., 2002;Yamasoe et al., 2000;Reid et al., 2005), local soil
Fe incorporated into the aerosol mixture during combustion, or the binding of aerosol Fe to black carbon-containing particles 20
in the atmosphere during transport. Using single particle analysis, mixed sources (e.g. black carbon and aluminosilicates) were
detected in long-range transported aerosols to Antarctica (Ellis et al., 2015). The fractional Fe solubility data (2-12 %) plots
mid-range for aerosol Fe sources characteristic of dust and combustion in the Southern Hemisphere (Fig. 7).
4.6.2. Particle size distribution of biomass burning-derived particles
The particle size distribution of biomass burning aerosols was typically centred around 95 nm (with 95 % of all particles 25
between 30-280 nm) for nearby fresh smoke at Gunn Point and around 120 nm (95 % of all particles were between 40-390
nm) for distant aged smoke at Gunn Point (Mallet et al., submitted). While the literature shows that for aged/long-range
transported smoke, the particle size distribution ranges between 75-540 nm (Kipling et al., 2013). As the particle size
distribution for black carbon is in the nanometre range, any Fe associated with black carbon-containing particles is
operationally defined as soluble (i.e., <0.2 µm). The majority of soluble Fe in Gunn Point aerosols during large biomass 30
burning events was within this <0.2 µm pool (i.e., the concentration of soluble Fe <0.2 µm was 7 ng m-3 compared to the bulk
14
soluble Fe concentration of 10 ng m-3 in GP22). PM1 ambient aerosols sampled during the SAFIRED campaign were
dominated by an organic fraction (Milic et al., 2016). Many of the finer particles are also likely to be derived from biomass
burning, given the particle size distribution of biomass burning aerosols at Gunn Point was typically centred around 100 nm
(Mallet et al., submitted) and thus operationally defined as soluble. Recent studies show that nanometre-sized Fe particles are
potentially bioavailable (e.g. Raiswell et al., 2008). The proportion of soluble Fe in the <0.2 µm pool is likely to vary between 5
the dry and wet season as different aerosol sources switch on and off, i.e., mineral dust has a coarser particle size distribution
than biomass burning-derived particles. Future work should be directed towards quantifying biomass burning sources of
bioavailable Fe in tropical and remote oceanic regions.
4.6.3. Oxalate modification
Oxalate modification of mineral dust could be a leading factor enhancing the fractional Fe solubility of mineral dust (Ito and 10
Shi, 2016) in regions where there are high oxalate concentrations in the atmosphere, such as the tropics. The higher fractional
Fe solubility during dust events at Gunn Point could be related to biomass burning-derived-oxalate enhancing the solubility of
Australian mineral dust that has been transported to the Northern Territory and mixed with biomass burning plumes (Fig. 6).
The fractional Fe solubility of mineral dust in the Southern Hemisphere is around 0.5-2 % (Sholkovitz et al., 2012), which is
lower than our estimates of fractional Fe solubility during dust events in northern Australia. Only trace concentrations of 15
oxalate are found in air masses in lower latitudes over Antarctica and the Southern Ocean (Keywood, 2007). Although, little
is known about the enhancement of fractional Fe solubility in these pristine air masses (Chance et al., 2015;Winton et al.,
2015), the concentrations of oxalate could be too low to influence fractional Fe solubility of mineral dust. Therefore, the mean
biomass burning enhanced mineral dust fractional Fe solubility of ~8 % represents an upper bound of mineral dust fractional
Fe solubility in the Australian tropics during the dry season as illustrated in Fig. 7. 20
4.6.4. Aging of biomass burning-derived particles
Despite the influx of aerosols from proximal fires, the fractional Fe solubility remained low between the 21 and 27 June (Fig.
6). This relationship could be related to the hydrophobic, i.e. water insoluble, nature of black carbon-containing particles (e.g.
Chughtai et al., 1996). The low soluble Fe concentrations, and low fractional Fe solubility, derived from the heavily caked
soot filters between the 21 and 27 June could reflect the physical properties of fresh black carbon, i.e., fresh black carbon does 25
not disperse in water thus any soluble Fe associated with fresh black carbon is not incorporated into the water leach. However,
combustion aerosols are known to have a high fractional Fe solubility (Sholkovitz et al., 2012) and often these studies are
based on aerosols collected shipboard in the remote open ocean where aerosol Fe has undergone atmospheric transport and
aging. Therefore, the fractional Fe solubility in these studies is not directly comparable to fresh combustion Fe reported in this
study. Combustion aerosols can become more soluble with transport (Ito, 2015). There is a growing body of work that suggests 30
aerosol Fe solubility can be enhanced by cloud chemistry and acid processing (Meskhidze et al., 2003;Spokes et al.,
1994;Desboeufs et al., 1999;Kumar et al., 2010). Ito and Shi (2016) show that enhanced Fe solubility of dust could be related
15
to reactive organic species, such as oxalate, in cloud water, which contains Fe-binding functionalities such as humic-like
substances from biomass burning. In a review of Fe chemistry in systems containing humic-like substances, Al-Abadleh (2015)
highlights the complexation and dissolution processes in which aerosol Fe solubility is enhanced with organic compounds.
Fresh black carbon-containing particles are initially insoluble, but can be aged into a form that disperses in water following
uptake of sulphuric acid and secondary organic material via condensation and coagulation in the atmosphere. Black carbon 5
particles can act as a seed for condensation and the components that condense on the surface of the black carbon particles are
water soluble. Aged black carbon-containing particles can also disperse in water through the oxidation of functional groups
during atmospheric transport over the remote ocean (Lohmann et al., 2000;Decesari et al., 2002;Chughtai et al., 1991;Chughtai
et al., 1996). If the surface of black carbon particles becomes hydrophilic with a coating of water soluble species in the
atmosphere, soluble Fe bound to the black carbon-containing particles would disperse in water and be captured in the water 10
soluble Fe leach. There was no significant atmospheric processing of proximal fires during the SAFIRED campaign (Milic et
al., 2016). The lack of atmospheric processing could explain why, i) the fractional Fe solubility was higher in distally sourced
fire event “E” compared to proximal fire events “FG” and “HI”, and ii) relatively high fractional Fe solubility is observed in
long-range transported aerosol to the remote Southern Ocean and Antarctica (Conway et al., 2015;Gaspari et al., 2006;Winton
et al., 2015;Winton et al., 2016b). The impact of transport time and distance on fractional Fe solubility should be further 15
investigated.
We provide evidence that Fe in freshly emitted biomass burning aerosols are not particularly soluble. In turn this suggests that
atmospheric aging itself plays a significant role in observations of soluble Fe in plumes sampled far from combustion sources.
Ito (2015) model the transport of soluble Fe derived from combustion sources. The model indicates relatively low fractional 20
Fe solubility near the sources of biomass burning and coal combustion. The fractional Fe solubility becomes higher as aerosols
are transported to the open ocean. Therefore, transport time and distance could be an important factor in fractional Fe solubility.
Alternatively, the relatively low fractional Fe solubility could be related to the type of biomass in northern Australia (i.e.,
savannah that is comprised of eucalypt dominated woodlands (10-30 % foliage cover) and open-forests (30-70 % foliage
cover), with a diverse woody sub-canopy and grassy ground cover (Edwards et al., 2015). There is a wide range of fractional 25
Fe solubility estimates for combustion aerosols in the literature and more studies are required to understand the fractional Fe
solubility in different biomass types. On the other hand, low fractional Fe solubility during fire events questions whether
biomass burning could be a potential bioavailable source of Fe. In a study of biomass burning-related emissions of Fe in the
Mediterranean, Guieu et al. (2005) found that fractional Fe solubility was lower than this study (0.6-2 %) and concluded that
while biomass burning may have a significant local effect on aerosol Fe supply to the ocean, on a global scale biomass burning 30
has little impact. Clearly future work should be directed towards the solubility of Fe in fresh and aged smoke plumes. We have
focused our discussion around the fractional Fe solubility of mixed biomass burning aerosols and mineral dust. The trends in
fractional Fe solubility paralleled fractional Al and Ti (but not Mn) solubility variation throughout the campaign, implying that
the factors that regulate fractional Fe solubility in these samples may also regulate the solubility of Al and Ti. Little is known
16
about the fractional Al, Ti and Mn solubility in biomass burning-derived aerosols. Again, future studies should investigate
these Fe, Al and Ti aerosols in conjunction both at the source and in long range air masses downwind of biomass burning.
5. Conclusions
Co-emissions of mineral dust and aged biomass burning from Australia are potential sources of soluble Fe to Australian tropical
waters. During the SAFIRED campaign, northern Australia in the dry season 2014, there was considerable temporal variability 5
in soluble and total PM10 aerosol Fe concentrations that reflect coincident mineral dust and fresh smoke sources. Fractional
Fe solubility was relatively high throughout the campaign and ranged from 2 to 12 %. During dust events, the fractional Fe
solubility was greatest (12 %), however, decreased to 3 % during an intense biomass burning period. Whilst mineral dust
supplied soluble Fe throughout the campaign, the lower fractional Fe solubility in the large biomass burning event suggests
that the primary factor controlling soluble Fe was the presence of mineral dust. The dust could have been entrained into the 10
biomass burning plume from local soil and also transported from central Australian deserts. Due to the hydrophobic nature of
fresh black carbon, biomass burning itself may not be a direct source of soluble Fe to the ocean. Nevertheless, biomass burning
species can enhance the soluble Fe chemistry in mixed aerosols. Iron in dust may be more soluble in the tropics, compared to
higher latitudes, due to the higher concentrations of biomass burning-derived reactive organic species in the atmosphere, such
as oxalate, and their potential to enhance the fractional Fe solubility of mineral dust during transport. Soluble Fe could be 15
further enhanced during atmospheric transport and aging of black carbon-containing particles that could explain the relatively
high episodic fractional Fe solubility observed in long-range transportable aerosol Fe to the Southern Ocean and Antarctica.
In addition, black carbon-containing particles can act as a surface for aerosol Fe to bind to during transport. Biomass burning
constitutes a large fraction of the aerosol loading over the tropics which has the potential to modulate soluble Fe and trigger
nitrogen fixing toxic algal blooms. Such toxic algal blooms have harmful consequences for humans and other vertebrates. The 20
understanding of the factors that initiate algal blooms needs to be improved (Law et al., 2011;Abram et al., 2003), especially
over tropical regions where inputs of biomass burning to the ocean are predicted to increase over the next century (Keywood
et al., 2013).
Data availability
The trace element dataset is available through the Curtin University Research Data repository 25
http://doi.org/10.4225/06/5671012A48C2A.
17
Author contribution
V.H.L.W., R.E. and A.R.B. designed the research; V.H.L.W. and M.D. collected the aerosol filters; V.H.L.W., R.E. and A.R.B.
prepared the trace element filter samples, analyzed and evaluated the data; P.W.S. prepared the elemental carbon and major
ion filter samples and analyzed the data; M.D. and C.P.W. collected and analyzed the carbon monoxide data; S.C. and A.W.
collected and analyzed the radon data; M.M and M.K. analyzed the particle size distribution data; M.K., P.W.S., S.C., A.W., 5
M.M., M.D., C.P.W. and V.H.L.W. contributed to the field campaign; V.H.L.W. prepared the manuscript with contributions
from all co-authors.
Acknowledgments
This paper is a contribution to the Savannah Fires in the Early Dry Season (SAFIRED) campaign. This project was funded
through Curtin University (RES-SE-DAP-AW-47679-1 to R.E), the University of Tasmania (B0019024 to A.R.B.), the 10
Australian Research Council (FT130100037 to A.R.B.), the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems (ARC CRC) and the CSIRO.
Access to HR-ICP-MS instrumentation at Curtin University was facilitated through ARC LIEF funding (LE130100029).
V.H.L.W. would like to acknowledge the following scholarship support: Australian Postgraduate Award, Curtin Research
Scholarship, CUPSA data collection grant and Curtin University Publication Scholarship. Thank you to CSIRO Ocean and
Atmosphere for the use of their high-volume aerosol sampler and to the Bureau of Meteorology for the use of their site 15
throughout the campaign. Thank you to the SAFIRED team, in particular to Rob Gillet and Jason Ward for assisting with the
changeover of daily aerosol filters and to Brad Atkinson from the Bureau of Meteorology for assistance at Gunn Point. Thank
you to Sylvester Werczynski for installing and maintaining the ANSTO radon detector, and for obtaining the back trajectories
from HYSPLIT and cataloguing them in a database for use with the Gunn Point data. Thank you to Pier van der Merwe for
technical support with aerosol digestions. Wind roses were created using OpenAir package in R and meteorological data from 20
the Bureau of Meteorology. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which improved this
manuscript.
References
Abram, N. J., Gagan, M. K., McCulloch, M. T., Chappell, J., and Hantoro, W. S.: Coral reef death during the 1997 Indian Ocean dipole linked to Indonesian wildfires, Science, 301, 952-955, 2003. 25 Aguilar-Islas, A. M., Wu, J., Rember, R., Johansen, A. M., and Shank, L. M.: Dissolution of aerosol-derived iron in seawater: Leach solution chemistry, aerosol type, and colloidal iron fraction, Marine Chemistry, 120, 25-33, 2010. Al-Abadleh, H. A.: Review of the bulk and surface chemistry of iron in atmospherically relevant systems containing humic-like substances, RSC Advances, 5, 45785-45811, 2015. Andersen, A. N., Cook, G. D., Corbett, L. K., Douglas, M. M., Eager, R. W., RUSSELL‐SMITH, J., Setterfield, S. A., Williams, R. J., and 30 Woinarski, J. C.: Fire frequency and biodiversity conservation in Australian tropical savannas: implications from the Kapalga fire experiment, Austral Ecology, 30, 155-167, 2005. Andreae, M., and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 3131-3148, 2006.
18
Arimoto, R., Duce, R. A., and Ray, B. J.: Concentrations, sources and air-sea exchange of trace elements in the atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean, Chemical Oceanography, 10, 107-149, 1989. Baker, A., Kelly, S., Biswas, K., Witt, M., and Jickells, T.: Atmospheric deposition of nutrients to the Atlantic Ocean, Geophysical Research Letters, 30, 2003. Baker, A., Weston, K., Kelly, S., Voss, M., Streu, P., and Cape, J.: Dry and wet deposition of nutrients from the tropical Atlantic atmosphere: 5 Links to primary productivity and nitrogen fixation, Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 54, 1704-1720, 2007. Baker, A., Adams, C., Bell, T., Jickells, T., and Ganzeveld, L.: Estimation of atmospheric nutrient inputs to the Atlantic Ocean from 50° N to 50° S based on large‐scale field sampling: Iron and other dust‐associated elements, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 27, 755-767, 2013. Baker, A. R., Jickells, T. D., Witt, M., and Linge, K. L.: Trends in the solubility of iron, aluminium, manganese and phosphorus in aerosol collected over the Atlantic Ocean, Marine Chemistry, 98, 43-58, 2006. 10 Baker, A. R., and Croot, P. L.: Atmospheric and marine controls on aerosol iron solubility in seawater, Marine Chemistry, 120, 4-13, 2010. Berman-Frank, I., Cullen, J. T., Shaked, Y., Sherrell, R. M., and Falkowski, P. G.: Iron availability, cellular iron quotas, and nitrogen fixation in Trichodesmium, Limnology and Oceanography, 46, 1249-1260, 2001. Bisiaux, M., Edwards, R., McConnell, J., Curran, M., Van Ommen, T., Smith, A., Neumann, T., Pasteris, D., Penner, J., and Taylor, K.: Changes in black carbon deposition to Antarctica from two high-resolution ice core records, 1850–2000 AD, Atmospheric Chemistry and 15 Physics, 12, 4107-4115, 2012. Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K., Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U., Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C. S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment, Journal of Geophysical 20 Research: Atmospheres, 118, 5380-5552, 10.1002/jgrd.50171, 2013. Bowie, A. R., Lannuzel, D., Remenyi, T. A., Wagener, T., Lam, P. J., Boyd, P. W., Guieu, C., Townsend, A. T., and Trull, T. W.: Biogeochemical iron budgets of the Southern Ocean south of Australia: Decoupling of iron and nutrient cycles in the subantarctic zone by the summertime supply, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 23, GB4034, 10.1029/2009gb003500, 2009. Bowler, J.: Aridity in Australia: age, origins and expression in aeolian landforms and sediments, Earth-Science Reviews, 12, 279-310, 1976. 25 Boyd, P. W., Watson, A. J., Law, C. S., Abraham, E. R., Trull, T., Murdoch, R., Bakker, D. C. E., Bowie, A. R., Buesseler, K. O., Chang, H., Charette, M., Croot, P. L., Downing, K., Frew, R., Gall, M., Hadfield, M., Hall, J., Harvey, M., Jameson, G., LaRoche, J., Liddicoat, M. I., Ling, R., Maldonado, M. T., McKay, R. M., Nodder, S., Pickmere, S., Pridmore, R., Rintoul, S., Safi, K., Sutton, P., Strzepek, R., Tanneberger, K., Turner, S., Waite, A., and Zeldis, J.: A mesoscale phytoplankton bloom in the polar Southern Ocean stimulated by iron fertilization, Nature, 407, 695-702, 2000. 30 Boyd, P. W., and Ellwood, M. J.: The biogeochemical cycle of iron in the ocean, Nature Geosci, 3, 675-682, http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v3/n10/abs/ngeo964.html#supplementary-information, 2010. Boyd, P. W., Mackie, D. S., and Hunter, K. A.: Aerosol iron deposition to the surface ocean - Modes of iron supply and biological responses, Marine Chemistry, 120, 128-143, 2010. Carslaw, D. C., and Ropkins, K.: Openair - An R package for air quality data analysis, Environmental Modelling & Software, 27, 52-61, 35 2012. Carslaw, D. C.: The openair manual - open-source tools for analysing air pollution data., Manual for version 1.0, King’s College London., 2014. Chambers, S., Hong, S.-B., Williams, A., Crawford, J., Griffiths, A., and Park, S.-J.: Characterising terrestrial influences on Antarctic air masses using Radon-222 measurements at King George Island, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14, 9903-9916, 2014. 40 Chambers, S., Williams, A., Crawford, J., and Griffiths, A.: On the use of radon for quantifying the effects of atmospheric stability on urban emissions, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, 1175-1190, 2015. Chance, R., Jickells, T. D., and Baker, A. R.: Atmospheric trace metal concentrations, solubility and deposition fluxes in remote marine air over the south-east Atlantic, Marine Chemistry, 2015. Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Chen, L.-W. A., Chang, M. O., Robinson, N. F., Trimble, D., and Kohl, S.: The IMPROVE_A temperature 45 protocol for thermal/optical carbon analysis: maintaining consistency with a long-term database, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 57, 1014-1023, 2007. Chuang, P. Y., Duvall, R. M., Shafer, M. M., and Schauer, J. J.: The origin of water soluble particulate iron in the Asian atmospheric outflow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L07813, 10.1029/2004gl021946, 2005. Chughtai, A., Jassim, J., Peterson, J., Stedman, D., and Smith, D.: Spectroscopic and solubility characteristics of oxidized soots, Aerosol 50 Science and Technology, 15, 112-126, 1991. Chughtai, A., Brooks, M., and Smith, D.: Hydration of black carbon, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 101, 19505-19514, 1996. Conway, T., Wolff, E., Röthlisberger, R., Mulvaney, R., and Elderfield, H.: Constraints on soluble aerosol iron flux to the Southern Ocean at the Last Glacial Maximum, Nature Communications, 6, 2015. 55
19
Cropp, R. A., Gabric, A. J., Levasseur, M., McTainsh, G. H., Bowie, A., Hassler, C. S., Law, C. S., McGowan, H., Tindale, N., and Viscarra Rossel, R.: The likelihood of observing dust-stimulated phytoplankton growth in waters proximal to the Australian continent, Journal of Marine Systems, 117–118, 43-52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2013.02.013, 2013. Cutter, G., Andersson, P., Codispoti, L., Croot, P., Francois, R., Lohan, M., Obata, H., and Rutgers vd Loeff, M.: Sampling and sample-handling protocols for GEOTRACES Cruises, 2010. 5 De Deckker, P., Norman, M., Goodwin, I. D., Wain, A., and Gingele, F. X.: Lead isotopic evidence for an Australian source of aeolian dust to Antarctica at times over the last 170,000 years, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 285, 205-223, 2010. Decesari, S., Facchini, M., Matta, E., Mircea, M., Fuzzi, S., Chughtai, A., and Smith, D.: Water soluble organic compounds formed by oxidation of soot, Atmospheric Environment, 36, 1827-1832, 2002. Desboeufs, K., Losno, R., Vimeux, F., and Cholbi, S.: The pH‐dependent dissolution of wind‐transported Saharan dust, Journal of 10 Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 104, 21287-21299, 1999. Dörr, H., Kromer, B., Levin, I., Münnich, K., and Volpp, H. J.: CO2 and Radon 222 as tracers for atmospheric transport, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978–2012), 88, 1309-1313, 1983. Draxler, R. R., and Rolph, G. D.: Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT), model, http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html, 2003. 15 Duce, R., Arimoto, R., Ray, B., Unni, C., and Harder, P.: Atmospheric trace elements at Enewetak Atoll: 1. Concentrations, sources, and temporal variability, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 88, 5321-5342, 1983. Duce, R. A., Liss, P. S., Merrill, J. T., Atlas, E. L., Buat-Menard, P., Hicks, B. B., Miller, J. M., Prospero, J. M., Arimoto, R., Church, T. M., Ellis, W., Galloway, J. N., Hansen, L., Jickells, T. D., Knap, A. H., Reinhardt, K. H., Schneider, B., Soudine, A., Tokos, J. J., Tsunogai, S., Wollast, R., and Zhou, M.: The atmospheric input of trace species to the world ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 5, 193-259, 20 10.1029/91gb01778, 1991. Edwards, A., Russell-Smith, J., and Meyer, M.: Contemporary fire regime risks to key ecological assets and processes in north Australian savannas, International Journal of Wildland Fire, 24, 857-870, 2015. Ellis, A., Edwards, R., Saunders, M., Chakrabarty, R. K., Subramanian, R., van Riessen, A., Smith, A. M., Lambrinidis, D., Nunes, L. J., Vallelonga, P., Goodwin, I. D., Moy, A. D., Curran, M. A. J., and van Ommen, T. D.: Characterizing black carbon in rain and ice cores using 25 coupled tangential flow filtration and transmission electron microscopy, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3959-3969, 10.5194/amt-8-3959-2015, 2015. Elrod, V., Berelson, W., Coale, K., and Johnson, K.: The flux of iron from continental shelf sediments: a missing source for global budgets, Geophys Res Lett, 31, L12307, 2004. Falkowski, P. G.: Evolution of the nitrogen cycle and its influence on the biological sequestration of CO 2 in the ocean, Nature, 387, 272-30 275, 1997. Fishwick, M. P., Sedwick, P. N., Lohan, M. C., Worsfold, P. J., Buck, K. N., Church, T. M., and Ussher, S. J.: The impact of changing surface ocean conditions on the dissolution of aerosol iron, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2014GB004921, 10.1002/2014GB004921, 2014. Gabric, A. J., Cropp, R. A., McTainsh, G. H., Johnston, B. M., Butler, H., Tilbrook, B., and Keywood, M.: Australian dust storms in 2002–2003 and their impact on Southern Ocean biogeochemistry, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 24, 2010. 35 Gao, Y., Xu, G., Zhan, J., Zhang, J., Li, W., Lin, Q., Chen, L., and Lin, H.: Spatial and particle size distributions of atmospheric dissolvable iron in aerosols and its input to the Southern Ocean and coastal East Antarctica, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118, 12,634-612,648, 2013. Garcia, N. S., Fu, F., Sedwick, P. N., and Hutchins, D. A.: Iron deficiency increases growth and nitrogen-fixation rates of phosphorus-deficient marine cyanobacteria, ISME J, 9, 238-245, 10.1038/ismej.2014.104, 2015. 40 Gaspari, V., Barbante, C., Cozzi, G., Cescon, P., Boutron, C. F., Gabrielli, P., Capodaglio, G., Ferrari, C., Petit, J. R., and Delmonte, B.: Atmospheric iron fluxes over the last deglaciation: Climatic implications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L03704, 10.1029/2005gl024352, 2006. Gelado‐Caballero, M. D., López‐García, P., Prieto, S., Patey, M. D., Collado, C., and Hérnández‐Brito, J. J.: Long‐term aerosol measurements in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands: Particle concentration, sources and elemental composition, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117, 2012. 45 Giglio, L., Randerson, J. T., and Werf, G. R.: Analysis of daily, monthly, and annual burned area using the fourth‐generation global fire emissions database (GFED4), Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 118, 317-328, 2013. Guieu, C., Bonnet, S., Wagener, T., and Loÿe‐Pilot, M. D.: Biomass burning as a source of dissolved iron to the open ocean?, Geophysical Research Letters, 32, 2005. Hesse, P. P.: The record of continental dust from Australia in Tasman Sea sediments, Quaternary Science Reviews, 13, 257-272, 1994. 50 Hesse, P. P., and McTainsh, G. H.: Australian dust deposits: modern processes and the Quaternary record, Quaternary Science Reviews, 22, 2007-2035, 2003. Hibberd, M., Selleck, P., Keywood, M., Cohen, D., Stelcer, E., and Atanacio, A.: Upper Hunter Particle Characterisation Study, Australia: CSIRO, 2013.
20
Iinuma, Y., Engling, G., Puxbaum, H., and Herrmann, H.: A highly resolved anion-exchange chromatographic method for determination of saccharidic tracers for biomass combustion and primary bio-particles in atmospheric aerosol, Atmospheric Environment, 43, 1367-1371, 2009. Ito, A.: Mega fire emissions in Siberia: potential supply of bioavailable iron from forests to the ocean, Biogeosciences, 8, 2011. Ito, A.: Global modeling study of potentially bioavailable iron input from shipboard aerosol sources to the ocean, Global Biogeochemical 5 Cycles, 27, 1-10, 2013. Ito, A.: Atmospheric Processing of Combustion Aerosols as a Source of Bioavailable Iron, Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2, 70-75, 10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00007, 2015. Ito, A., and Shi, Z.: Delivery of anthropogenic bioavailable iron from mineral dust and combustion aerosols to the ocean, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16, 85-99, 2016. 10 Johnson, K. S., Gordon, R. M., and Coale, K. H.: What controls dissolved iron concentrations in the world ocean?, Marine Chemistry, 57, 137-161, 1997. Johnston, S. W.: The influence of aeolian dust deposits on alpine soils in south-eastern Australia, Soil Research, 39, 81-88, 2001. Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A., Galloway, J. N., and Hawley, M. E.: Sea‐salt corrections and interpretation of constituent ratios in marine precipitation, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 91, 6647-6658, 1986. 15 Keywood, M., Kanakidou, M., Stohl, A., Dentener, F., Grassi, G., Meyer, C., Torseth, K., Edwards, D., Thompson, A. M., and Lohmann, U.: Fire in the air: biomass burning impacts in a changing climate, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 40-83, 2013. Keywood, M. D.: Aerosol composition at Cape Grim : an evaluation of PM10 sampling program and baseline event switches., Baseline Atmospheric Program Australia 2005-2006. 2005-2006 ed. J. M. Cainey, N. Derek, and P. B. Krummel (editors). Melbourne: Australian 20 Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, 31-36, 2007. Kipling, Z., Stier, P., Schwarz, J., Perring, A., Spackman, J., Mann, G., Johnson, C., and Telford, P.: Constraints on aerosol processes in climate models from vertically-resolved aircraft observations of black carbon, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13, 5969, 2013. Knapp, A. N., Casciotti, K. L., Berelson, W. M., Prokopenko, M. G., and Capone, D. G.: Low rates of nitrogen fixation in eastern tropical South Pacific surface waters, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 4398-4403, 10.1073/pnas.1515641113, 2016. 25 Kumar, A., Sarin, M., and Srinivas, B.: Aerosol iron solubility over Bay of Bengal: Role of anthropogenic sources and chemical processing, Marine Chemistry, 121, 167-175, 2010. Kustka, A. B., Sañudo‐Wilhelmy, S. A., Carpenter, E. J., Capone, D., Burns, J., and Sunda, W. G.: Iron requirements for dinitrogen‐and ammonium‐supported growth in cultures of Trichodesmium (IMS 101): Comparison with nitrogen fixation rates and iron: Carbon ratios of field populations, Limnology and Oceanography, 48, 1869-1884, 2003. 30 Lane, S., Proemse, B. C., Tennant, A., and Wieser, M. E.: Concentration measurements and isotopic composition of airborne molybdenum collected in an urban environment, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 405, 2957-2963, 2013. LaRoche, J., and Breitbarth, E.: Importance of the diazotrophs as a source of new nitrogen in the ocean, Journal of Sea Research, 53, 67-91, 2005. Law, C., Woodward, E., Ellwood, M., Marriner, A., Bury, S., and Safi, K.: Response of surface nutrient inventories and nitrogen fixation to 35 a tropical cyclone in the southwest Pacific, Limnology and Oceanography, 56, 1372-1385, 2011. Lenes, J., Darrow, B., Walsh, J., Prospero, J., He, R., Weisberg, R., Vargo, G., and Heil, C.: Saharan dust and phosphatic fidelity: A three-dimensional biogeochemical model of Trichodesmium as a nutrient source for red tides on the West Florida Shelf, Continental Shelf Research, 28, 1091-1115, 2008. Lohmann, U., Feichter, J., Penner, J., and Leaitch, R.: Indirect effect of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols- A mechanistic treatment, Journal 40 of Geophysical Research, 105, 12193-12206, 2000. Mackie, D. S., Boyd, P. W., Hunter, K. A., and McTainsh, G. H.: Simulating the cloud processing of iron in Australian dust: pH and dust concentration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L06809, 10.1029/2004gl022122, 2005. Mackie, D. S., Boyd, P. W., McTainsh, G. H., Tindale, N. W., Westberry, T. K., and Hunter, K. A.: Biogeochemistry of iron in Australian dust: From eolian uplift to marine uptake, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 9, Q03Q08, 10.1029/2007gc001813, 2008. 45 Maenhaut, W., Fernández-Jiménez, M.-T., Rajta, I., and Artaxo, P.: Two-year study of atmospheric aerosols in Alta Floresta, Brazil: Multielemental composition and source apportionment, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 189, 243-248, 2002. Mahowald, N. M., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., Duce, R. A., Jickells, T. D., Kubilay, N., Prospero, J. M., and Tegen, I.: Atmospheric global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 19, GB4025, 10.1029/2004gb002402, 2005. 50 Mahowald, N. M., Engelstaedter, S., Luo, C., Sealy, A., Artaxo, P., Benitez-Nelson, C., Bonnet, S., Chen, Y., Chuang, P. Y., and Cohen, D. D.: Atmospheric iron deposition: Global distribution, variability, and human perturbations*, Marine Science, 1, 2009. Marx, S. K., Kamber, B. S., and McGowan, H. A.: Estimates of Australian dust flux into New Zealand: Quantifying the eastern Australian dust plume pathway using trace element calibrated< sup> 210</sup> Pb as a monitor, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 239, 336-351, 2005. 55
21
McTainsh, G., Chan, Y.-c., McGowan, H., Leys, J., and Tews, K.: The 23rd October 2002 dust storm in eastern Australia: characteristics and meteorological conditions, Atmospheric Environment, 39, 1227-1236, 2005. Meskhidze, N., Chameides, W., Nenes, A., and Chen, G.: Iron mobilization in mineral dust: Can anthropogenic SO2 emissions affect ocean productivity?, Geophysical Research Letters, 30, 2003. Meskhidze, N., Johnson, M. S., Hurley, D., and Dawson, K.: Influence of measurement uncertainties on fractional solubility of iron in 5 mineral aerosols over the oceans, Aeolian Research, 22, 85-92, 2016. Meyer, C. P., Luhar, A. K., and Mitchell, R. M.: Biomass burning emissions over northern Australia constrained by aerosol measurements: I—Modelling the distribution of hourly emissions, Atmospheric Environment, 42, 1629-1646, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.089, 2008. Milic, A., Mallet, M. D., Cravigan, L. T., Alroe, J., Ristovski, Z. D., Selleck, P., Lawson, S. J., Ward, J., Desservettaz, M. J., Paton-Walsh, 10 C., Williams, L. R., Keywood, M. D., and Miljevic, B.: Aging of aerosols emitted from biomass burning in northern Australia, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 2016, 1-24, 10.5194/acp-2016-730, 2016. Mills, M. M., Ridame, C., Davey, M., La Roche, J., and Geider, R. J.: Iron and phosphorus co-limit nitrogen fixation in the eastern tropical North Atlantic, Nature, 429, 292-294, 2004. Morton, P. L., Landing, W. M., Hsu, S.-C., Milne, A., Aguilar-Islas, A. M., Baker, A. R., Bowie, A. R., Buck, C. S., Gao, Y., and Gichuki, 15 S.: Methods for the sampling and analysis of marine aerosols: results from the 2008 GEOTRACES aerosol intercalibration experiment, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 11, 62-78, 2013. Pacyna, J., and Nriagu, J.: Atmospheric emissions of chromium from natural and anthropogenic sources, Chromium in the Natural and Human Environments, 105-123, 1988. Paerl, H. W., Crocker, K. M., and Prufert, L. E.: Limitation of N2 fixation in coastal marine waters: Relative importance of molybdenum, 20 iron, phosphorus, and organic matter availability1, Limnology and Oceanography, 32, 525-536, 1987. Paerl, H. W., Prufert-Bebout, L. E., and Guo, C.: Iron-stimulated N2 fixation and growth in natural and cultured populations of the planktonic marine cyanobacteria Trichodesmium spp, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 60, 1044-1047, 1994. Paris, R., Desboeufs, K., Formenti, P., Nava, S., and Chou, C.: Chemical characterisation of iron in dust and biomass burning aerosols during AMMA-SOP0/DABEX: implication for iron solubility, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 4273-4282, 2010. 25 Petzold, A., Ogren, J., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., and Sugimoto, N.: Recommendations for reporting" black carbon" measurements, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13, 8365-8379, 2013. Raiswell, R., Benning, L. G., Davidson, L., and Tranter, M.: Nanoparticulate bioavailable iron minerals in icebergs and glaciers, Mineral Mag, 72, 345-348, 10.1180/minmag.2008.072.1.345, 2008. Reid, J., Koppmann, R., Eck, T., and Eleuterio, D.: A review of biomass burning emissions part II: intensive physical properties of biomass 30 burning particles, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5, 799-825, 2005. Reimann, C., and Caritat, P. d.: Intrinsic flaws of element enrichment factors (EFs) in environmental geochemistry, Environmental Science & Technology, 34, 5084-5091, 2000. Revel-Rolland, M., De Deckker, P., Delmonte, B., Hesse, P. P., Magee, J. W., Basile-Doelsch, I., Grousset, F., and Bosch, D.: Eastern Australia: A possible source of dust in East Antarctica interglacial ice, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 249, 1-13, 2006. 35 Rubin, M., Berman-Frank, I., and Shaked, Y.: Dust-and mineral-iron utilization by the marine dinitrogen-fixer Trichodesmium, Nature Geoscience, 4, 529-534, 2011. Rueter, J. G.: Iron stimulation of photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation in anabaena 7120 and trichodesmium (cyanophyceae), Journal of Phycology, 24, 249-254, 1988. Rueter, J. G., Hutchins, D. A., Smith, R. W., and Unsworth, N. L.: Iron nutrition of Trichodesmium, in: Marine pelagic cyanobacteria: 40 Trichodesmium and other Diazotrophs, Springer, 289-306, 1992. Schroth, A. W., Crusius, J., Sholkovitz, E. R., and Bostick, B. C.: Iron solubility driven by speciation in dust sources to the ocean, Nature Geosci, 2, 337-340, http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v2/n5/suppinfo/ngeo501_S1.html, 2009. Sedwick, P. N., Sholkovitz, E. R., and Church, T. M.: Impact of anthropogenic combustion emissions on the fractional solubility of aerosol iron: Evidence from the Sargasso Sea, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 8, Q10Q06, 10.1029/2007gc001586, 2007. 45 Shaw, E. C., Gabric, A. J., and McTainsh, G. H.: Impacts of aeolian dust deposition on phytoplankton dynamics in Queensland coastal waters, Marine and Freshwater Research, 59, 951-962, 2008. Sholkovitz, E. R., Sedwick, P. N., Church, T. M., Baker, A. R., and Powell, C. F.: Fractional solubility of aerosol iron: Synthesis of a global-scale data set, Geochimica et cosmochimica acta, 89, 173-189, 2012. Spokes, L. J., Jickells, T. D., and Lim, B.: Solubilisation of aerosol trace metals by cloud processing: A laboratory study, Geochimica et 50 Cosmochimica Acta, 58, 3281-3287, 1994. Sprigg, R.: Some stratigraphic consequences of fluctuating Quaternary sea levels and related wind regimes in southern and central Australia, Quarternary dust mantles, China New Zealand and Australia. Australian National University, Canberra, 211-240, 1982. Srinivas, B., Sarin, M., and Kumar, A.: Impact of anthropogenic sources on aerosol iron solubility over the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea, Biogeochemistry, 110, 257-268, 2012. 55
22
Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., Dutay, J.-C., Bowie, A. R., Chever, F., Jean-Baptiste, P., Bucciarelli, E., Lannuzel, D., Remenyi, T., Sarthou, G., Aumont, O., Gehlen, M., and Jeandel, C.: Hydrothermal contribution to the oceanic dissolved iron inventory, Nature Geosci, 3, 252-256, http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v3/n4/suppinfo/ngeo818_S1.html, 2010. Wagener, T., Guieu, C., Losno, R., Bonnet, S., and Mahowald, N.: Revisiting atmospheric dust export to the Southern Hemisphere ocean: Biogeochemical implications, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 22, GB2006, 10.1029/2007gb002984, 2008. 5 Walsh, J. J., and Steidinger, K. A.: Saharan dust and Florida red tides: the cyanophyte connection, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978–2012), 106, 11597-11612, 2001. Wedepohl, K. H.: The composition of the continental crust, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 1217-1232, 1995. Whittlestone, S., and Zahorowski, W.: Baseline radon detectors for shipboard use: Development and deployment in the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1), Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 103, 16743-16751, 1998. 10 Winton, H., Bowie, A., Keywood, M., van der Merwe, P., and Edwards, R.: Suitability of high-volume aerosol samplers for ultra-trace aerosol iron measurements in pristine air masses: blanks, recoveries and bugs, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 2016, 1-32, 10.5194/amt-2016-12, 2016a. Winton, V. H. L., Bowie, A. R., Edwards, R., Keywood, M., Townsend, A. T., van der Merwe, P., and Bollhöfer, A.: Fractional iron solubility of atmospheric iron inputs to the Southern Ocean, Marine Chemistry, 177, Part 1, 20-32, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2015.06.006, 15 2015. Winton, V. H. L., Edwards, R., Delmonte, B., Ellis, A., Andersson, P. S., Bowie, A., Bertler, N. A. N., Neff, P., and Tuohy, A.: Multiple sources of soluble atmospheric iron to Antarctic waters, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 30, 421-437, 10.1002/2015GB005265, 2016b. Wu, J., Rember, R., and Cahill, C.: Dissolution of aerosol iron in the surface waters of the North Pacific and North Atlantic oceans as determined by a semicontinuous flow-through reactor method, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 21, GB4010, 10.1029/2006gb002851, 2007. 20 Yamasoe, M. A., Artaxo, P., Miguel, A. H., and Allen, A. G.: Chemical composition of aerosol particles from direct emissions of vegetation fires in the Amazon Basin: water-soluble species and trace elements, Atmospheric Environment, 34, 1641-1653, 2000.
23
Table 1: Aerosol iron concentrations and dry deposition fluxes for Gunn Point PM10 aerosols.
Sample
Soluble Fe
concentration
(ng m-3)
± *Soluble Fe flux
(µmol m-2 d-1) ±
Total Fe
concentration
(ng m-3)
± *Total Fe flux
(µmol m-2 d-1) ±
GP1 30 2 0.9 1.9 286 9 9 18
GP2 37 1 1.1 2.3 384 12 12 24
GP3 49 2 1.5 3.1 598 19 18 37
GP4 78 3 2.4 4.8 1164 37 36 72
GP5 140 6 4.3 8.7 1158 37 36 71
GP6 66 3 2.0 4.1 823 26 25 51
GP7 20 0.8 0.6 1.2 236 7 7 15
GP8 35 1 1.1 2.2 374 12 12 23
GP9 35 1 1.1 2.2 385 12 12 24
GP10 46 2 1.4 2.8 539 17 17 33
GP11 92 4 2.8 5.7 928 29 29 57
GP12 52 2 1.6 3.2 677 21 21 42
GP13 31 1 1.0 1.9 331 10 10 20
GP14 23 0.9 0.7 1.4 192 6 6 12
GP15 15 0.6 0.5 0.9 123 4 4 8
GP16 7 0.3 0.2 0.5 60 2 2 4
GP17 67 3 2.1 4.2 1129 36 35 70
GP18 13 0.5 0.4 0.8 247 8 8 15
GP19 7 0.3 0.2 0.4 231 7 7 14
GP20 13 0.5 0.4 0.8 301 10 9 19
GP21 7 0.3 0.2 0.5 225 7 7 14
GP22 10 0.4 0.3 0.6 399 13 12 25
GP23 11 0.4 0.3 0.7 314 10 10 19
*The uncertainty in dry deposition fluxes was calculated by propagation of error of the analytical uncertainty and uncertainty
in the deposition velocity which is assumed to be a factor of 2-3 (Baker et al., 2003;Duce et al., 1991).
24
Table 2: Enrichment factor analysis of Gunn Point aerosol samples.
Pb Al V Cr Mn Fe K
GP1 2.57 0.60 1.81 1.22 0.53 1.12 1.72
GP2 3.18 0.76 2.24 1.54 0.67 1.28 1.91
GP3 2.32 0.68 2.09 1.41 0.88 1.13 1.23
GP4 1.38 0.64 1.93 1.26 0.88 1.07 0.67
GP5 1.83 0.55 1.77 1.28 0.68 0.97 0.64
GP6 3.42 0.59 1.72 1.34 1.03 1.03 2.17
GP7 8.81 0.59 1.81 1.88 1.44 1.02 5.50
GP8 3.77 0.66 2.08 1.34 0.72 1.15 1.49
GP9 4.25 0.58 1.85 1.38 0.60 1.08 1.63
GP10 3.42 0.67 2.29 7.93 0.49 1.16 1.37
GP11 1.22 0.73 2.00 1.32 0.44 1.14 0.34
GP12 2.05 0.64 1.95 1.48 1.47 1.14 1.23
GP13 5.32 0.62 1.57 1.09 1.22 1.07 1.07
GP14 6.55 0.64 1.67 1.16 1.48 1.08 2.30
GP15 6.60 0.65 2.84 3.37 1.07 0.99 1.79
GP16 2.39 0.62 1.77 0.99 1.40 0.88 1.49
GP17 0.79 0.72 1.73 4.22 0.23 0.91 0.25
GP18 1.63 0.67 2.09 1.34 0.52 1.04 0.48
GP19 12.46 0.63 1.78 1.55 1.22 1.00 2.65
GP20 8.05 0.68 1.60 1.25 4.70 1.10 4.79
GP21 4.65 0.69 1.90 1.32 1.43 1.16 2.63
GP22 5.72 0.71 1.96 1.37 2.18 1.12 3.92
GP23 4.25 0.69 1.92 1.22 1.77 1.04 1.76
25
Figure 1: Location of Gunn Point study site. Insert of the Northern Territory showing the Gunn Point site and the predominant air mass fetch regions for the June 2014 Gunn Point campaign. a) Inland, low population density. b) Coastal, moderate urban/industrial activity. c) Inland, major urban/industrial activity. d) Southerly. d) Wind rose corresponding to the aerosol sampling duration. Wind 5 rose created using the OpenAir package in R (Carslaw and Ropkins, 2012;Carslaw, 2014).
26
Figure 2: Fraction of water soluble iron in sequential leaches of all PM10 samples from the SAFIRED campaign. Details of samples GP1 to GP23 can be found in Table S1.
27
Figure 3: Time series of a) diurnal radon, b) advective radon, and total PM10 trace element concentrations c) Ti, d) Al, e) Fe, f) V, and g) Na.
28
Figure 4: Time series of a) elemental carbon, b) carbon monoxide, and total PM10 trace element concentrations c) nss-K, d) Cr, e) Mo, f), As, g) Mn, h) Pb, i) diurnal radon, and j) advective radon.
29
Figure 5: Time series of a) elemental carbon, b) carbon monoxide, c) total nss-K, soluble trace element concentrations, d) Al, e) Ti, f), Fe, g) Mn, h) V and i) diurnal radon, j) advective radon.
30
Figure 6: Time series of a) fractional Fe solubility, b) fractional Al solubility, c) fractional Ti solubility, d) fractional Mn solubility, e) oxalate, f) elemental carbon, and g) levoglucosan concentrations.
31
Figure 7: Gunn Point total PM10 aerosol iron mass concentration versus fractional Fe solubility superimposed on the Southern Hemispheric aerosol iron data set (Sholkovitz et al., 2012; and references within;Bowie et al., 2009;Gao et al., 2013;Winton et al., 2015). Boxes highlight the two clusters. Cluster 1: moderate fractional Fe solubility and moderate total aerosol iron loading between the 4 and 19 June, and represents the upper bound of dust fractional Fe solubility for the topical dry season. Cluster 2: low fractional 5 Fe solubility and low total aerosol iron loading between the 24 and 26 June.