dt upgrade strategy
DESCRIPTION
DT UPGRADE STRATEGY. M.Dallavalle for the DT Collaboration. The DT plan for the future started in 2009 It covers from 2013 up to LS3 Physics target: warrant the same excellent performance while LHC “grows” up LS1 2013 is the first step of a long-term strategy - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
DT UPGRADE STRATEGY
M.Dallavalle for the DT Collaboration
6/26/12 Muon IB
2
• The DT plan for the future started in 2009
• It covers from 2013 up to LS3• Physics target: warrant the
same excellent performance while LHC “grows” up
• LS1 2013 is the first step of a long-term strategy
• Improve robustness and longevity
• Improve flexibility to adapt to new conditions and to exploit new possibilites
» In particular for the TRIGGER
6/26/12 Muon IB
• Learn from Today’s system: what & why improve
3
Nowadays: System overview
6/26/12 Muon IB
Sector collector
TRBs
46/26/12 Muon IB
Studies with single-hits show that the tubes can stand the LHC environment
5
Aging of Minicrate electronics
6/26/12 Muon IB
• On-chamber Minicrates contain TDCs and trigger ASICs. BTIs date back to mid 1990s. Boards have been tested for at-least 10 years of LHC at 10^34 Hz/cm2.
• BTIM of Trigger Boards contain 4 BTI dies: bonds are sensitive to thermal stress during switch on/off. Current stock of spares is a potential issue.
• Conclusion: Minicrates can survive until LS3 provided we reinforce our stock of BTIMs
6DTTF
*BTIM functionality ported to rad-hard FPGA and new THETA TRB being produced. These will replace the old THETA TRBs in MB1 and MB2 of the external wheels (+2,-2)* Cannibalize retrieved BTIM for reparation of PHI TRBs
C. F. Bedoya May 22nd, 2012 6
Trigger in the theta view
BTIM technology obsolete=> migrate to FPGA
6/26/12 Muon IB
7
Minicrates in LS3
• The electronics will be 30 years old• It has been designed for using HDL and
the functionality can be transported to New more performing technologies
– See theta TRB replacement as an example
• However, the connections of Minicrates and the other system boxes constitute a bottleneck of the system: change to optical fibers as much as possible
6/26/12 Muon IB
8
Sector Collector limitations • In particular, the flow of Minicrate data
goes through the Sector Collectors (one per wheel) in the detector towers and this is a limit to the connectivity of the minicrates and constitute potential single failure points, given the limited access to UXC
• Move the SC to USC: connect all Minicrates to USC with optical fibers
6/26/12 Muon IB
9
System overview after LS1
6/26/12 Muon IB
New TSC
2016-2017?UXC USC
Sector collector
DTTF
10
New opportunities with all chamber trigger data in USC
• The optical fibers from the Minicrates can be split and offer input for running a new system in parallel to the current.
• At trigger level can test new algorithms exploiting single chamber (or even single Super-Layer) triggers in the difficult regions
• Can study new algorithms to improve redundancy with RPC (also available on fibers in USC).
• DT/RPC coincidence at station level can improve the BX ID in situations of high PU
6/26/12 Muon IB
11
Trigger Track finding limitations• The track finding algorithm requires trigger
segments from at least 2 chambers along a muon track
• This is a problem at eta +0.25,-0.25, i.e. in the cracks between wheel 0 and wheel +1,-1
6/26/12 Muon IB
12
Inefficiency btwn YB0 andYB+1,-1
6/26/12 Muon IB
136/26/12 Muon IB
another crack: The overlap region
Perchaps coincidence of signals from single DT, CSC, RPC chambers can be exploited for improving the efficiency in difficult regions
Trigger logics memo:
• CSCTF >= 3 CSC
• DTTF >= 2 DTs
• RPC 3of4 or 4of6 RPC
• Overlap DT&CSC, RPC not used
14
Muon Pt assignment in trigger
6/26/12 Muon IB
LV1HLT: Full TDC data;Standalone muon system;limited by multiple scatteringHLT: tracker + mu ID will allow trigger thresholds =< 20 GeV
156/26/12 Muon IB
DTTF Xsec (μb)
DTTF η<0.8DTTF η<1.2
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
(Courtesy of C. Battilana (CIEMAT) )
16
LV1 Track finder with Muon + tracker• extract selected tracker information and
combine it with the muon system in order to produce a muon trigger at Level-1
6/26/12 Muon IB
• after SC relocation, some PIXEL information (outer layer preferentially) could already be used, if available, in 2017
• Keep independence of the new tracker design. Define Region-of-Interest
17
R.o.I. for muon track• Different possibilities:
– The RoI can be defined by the muon system at a pre-Lv1 stage so that the load of data transfer from the tracker is reduced. This probably needs a new fast detector underneath MB1 stations with very rough (10-25 cm) position determination (MTT (CMS IN-2007/058), Y.Erdogan’s talk at this morning’s DT upgrade session,)
– The RoI can be defined at the Regional Level, using the DT trigger primitives to search the full tracker data (P.L.Zotto, DT part in upgrade Technical Proposal)
– The RoI can be defined by the tracker searching in the muon primitives a matching segment to a tracker stub (with tracker pt above threshold)
6/26/12 Muon IB
18
DT ugrade strategy in short
6/26/12 Muon IB
PHASE 1 LS1 (2013-2014)• Replacement of theta TRB (Trigger boards) : new TRBs use FPGAs; recuperate
BTIMs as spares for R-phi TRBs
* Relocation of Sector Collector from the cavern (UXC) to the counting room (USC): optical fibers to bring TDC data and trigger primitives from all chambers in USC
PHASE 1 following steps (not strictly related to LHC shutdowns) (2015-2017):Exploit optical fibers bringing all chamber (trigger) data in USC for running also a concurrent system for track finding (may also use RPC, pixel?, …)* Replacement of DTTF (DT Track Finder) * Redesign of the TSC boards (Sector Collector trigger)* Redesign of the ROS boards (Sector Collector read-out)
PHASE 2 (LS3) (2018 and beyond)* Insert connection with the tracker in the Level-1 trigger system (RoI)* Replacement of Minicrate electronics??
19
Conclusions
6/26/12 Muon IB
…possibly….