dtc agreement between australia and japan

Upload: oecd-organisation-for-economic-co-operation-and-development

Post on 06-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    1/51

    1

    CONVENTIONBETWEEN JAPAN AND AUSTRALIA

    FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATIONAND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASIONWITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME

    Japan and Australia,

    Desiring to conclude a new Convention for theavoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscalevasion with respect to taxes on income,

    Have agreed as follows:

    Article 1PERSONS COVERED

    This Convention shall apply to persons who areresidents of one or both of the Contracting States.

    Article 2TAXES COVERED

    1. This Convention shall apply to the following existingtaxes:

    a) in the case of Japan:

    (i) the income tax; and

    (ii) the corporation tax

    (hereinafter referred to as Japanese tax);

    b) in the case of Australia:

    (i) the income tax; and

    (ii) the petroleum resource rent tax

    (hereinafter referred to as Australian tax).

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    2/51

    2

    2. This Convention shall apply also to any identical orsubstantially similar taxes that are imposed by Japan or

    under the federal law of Australia after the date ofsignature of the Convention in addition to, or in place of,the existing taxes referred to in paragraph 1. Thecompetent authorities of the Contracting States shallnotify each other of any significant changes that have beenmade in the law of their respective Contracting Statesrelating to the taxes to which the Convention applieswithin a reasonable period of time after such changes.

    Article 3GENERAL DEFINITIONS

    1. For the purposes of this Convention, unless the

    context otherwise requires:

    a) the term Japan, when used in a geographicalsense, means all the territory of Japan,including its territorial sea, in which the lawsrelating to Japanese tax are in force, and allthe area beyond its territorial sea, includingthe seabed and subsoil thereof, over which Japanhas sovereign rights in accordance withinternational law and in which the laws relatingto Japanese tax are in force;

    b) the term Australia, when used in a geographicalsense, excludes all external territories otherthan:

    (i) the Territory of Norfolk Island;

    (ii) the Territory of Christmas Island;

    (iii) the Territory of Cocos (Keeling) Islands;

    (iv) the Territory of Ashmore and CartierIslands;

    (v) the Territory of Heard Island and McDonaldIslands; and

    (vi) the Coral Sea Islands Territory,

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    3/51

    3

    and includes any area adjacent to the territoriallimits of Australia (including only the

    Territories specified in this subparagraph) inrespect of which there is for the time being inforce, consistently with international law, a lawof Australia dealing with the exploration for orexploitation of any of the natural resources ofthe exclusive economic zone and the seabed andsubsoil of the continental shelf;

    c) the terms a Contracting State and the otherContracting State mean Japan or Australia, asthe context requires;

    d) the term tax means Japanese tax or Australian

    tax, as the context requires;

    e) the term person includes an individual, acompany and any other body of persons;

    f) the term company means any body corporate orany entity that is treated as a company or bodycorporate for tax purposes;

    g) the term enterprise applies to the carrying onof any business;

    h) the terms enterprise of a Contracting State andenterprise of the other Contracting State meanrespectively an enterprise carried on by aresident of a Contracting State and an enterprisecarried on by a resident of the other ContractingState;

    i) the term international traffic means anytransport by a ship or aircraft operated by anenterprise of a Contracting State, except whenthe ship or aircraft is operated solely betweenplaces in the other Contracting State;

    j) the term national, in relation to a ContractingState, means:

    (i) any individual possessing the nationality orcitizenship of that Contracting State; and

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    4/51

    4

    (ii) any juridical or legal person created ororganised under the law of that Contracting

    State and any organisation without juridicalor legal personality treated for thepurposes of that Contracting States tax asa juridical or legal person created ororganised under the law of that ContractingState;

    k) the term competent authority means:

    (i) in the case of Japan, the Minister ofFinance or an authorised representative ofthe Minister of Finance; and

    (ii) in the case of Australia, the Commissionerof Taxation or an authorised representativeof the Commissioner of Taxation; and

    l) the term business includes the performance ofprofessional services and of other activities ofan independent character.

    2. As regards the application of this Convention at anytime by a Contracting State, any term not defined thereinshall, unless the context otherwise requires, have themeaning that it has at that time under the law of that

    Contracting State concerning the taxes to which theConvention applies, any meaning under the applicable taxlaw of that Contracting State prevailing over a meaninggiven to the term under other law of that ContractingState.

    Article 4RESIDENT

    1. For the purposes of this Convention, the termresident of a Contracting State means:

    a) in the case of Japan, any person who, under thelaws of Japan, is liable to tax therein by reasonof the persons domicile, residence, place ofhead or main office, or any other criterion of asimilar nature; and

    b) in the case of Australia, a person who is aresident of Australia for the purposes ofAustralian tax.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    5/51

    5

    The Government of a Contracting State or a politicalsubdivision or local authority thereof is also a resident

    of that Contracting State for the purposes of theConvention. A person is not a resident of a ContractingState for the purposes of the Convention if the person isliable to tax in that Contracting State in respect only ofincome from sources in that Contracting State.

    2. Where by reason of the provisions of paragraph 1 anindividual is a resident of both Contracting States, thenthe individuals status shall be determined as follows:

    a) the individual shall be deemed to be a residentonly of the Contracting State in which theindividual has a permanent home available to that

    individual; if that individual has a permanenthome available to that individual in bothContracting States, or in neither of them, thatindividual shall be deemed to be a resident onlyof the Contracting State with which theindividuals personal and economic relations arecloser (centre of vital interests);

    b) if the Contracting State in which theindividuals centre of vital interests issituated cannot be determined, the individualshall be deemed to be a resident only of the

    Contracting State of which that individual is anational;

    c) if the individual is a national of bothContracting States or of neither of them, thecompetent authorities of the Contracting Statesshall endeavour to resolve the question by mutualagreement.

    3. Where by reason of the provisions of paragraph 1 aperson other than an individual is a resident of bothContracting States, then the competent authorities of theContracting States shall endeavour to determine by mutualagreement the Contracting State of which that person shallbe deemed to be a resident for the purposes of thisConvention, having regard to the place of its head or mainoffice, its place of effective management and any otherrelevant factors.

    4. In the absence of a mutual agreement undersubparagraph c) of paragraph 2 or paragraph 3 a person whois a resident of both Contracting States by reason of theprovisions of paragraph 1 shall not be considered aresident of either Contracting State for the purposes ofclaiming any benefits provided by this Convention, except

    those provided by Articles 26 and 27.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    6/51

    6

    5. For the purposes of applying this Convention:

    a) an item of income, profits or gains:

    (i) derived from a Contracting State through anentity that is organised in the otherContracting State; and

    (ii) treated as the income, profits or gains ofthe beneficiaries, members or participantsof that entity under the tax law of thatother Contracting State,

    shall be eligible for the benefits of theConvention that would be granted if it were

    directly derived by a beneficiary, member orparticipant of that entity who is a resident ofthat other Contracting State, to the extent thatsuch beneficiaries, members or participants areresidents of that other Contracting State andsatisfy any other conditions specified in theConvention, without regard to whether the income,profits or gains are treated as the income,profits or gains of such beneficiaries, membersor participants under the tax law of the first-mentioned Contracting State.

    b) an item of income, profits or gains:

    (i) derived from a Contracting State through anentity that is organised in the otherContracting State; and

    (ii) treated as the income, profits or gains ofthat entity under the tax law of that otherContracting State,

    shall be eligible for the benefits of theConvention that would be granted to a resident ofthat other Contracting State, without regard towhether the income, profits or gains are treatedas the income, profits or gains of the entityunder the tax law of the first-mentionedContracting State, if such entity is a residentof that other Contracting State and satisfies anyother conditions specified in the Convention.

    c) an item of income, profits or gains:

    (i) derived from a Contracting State through anentity that is organised in a state otherthan the Contracting States; and

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    7/51

    7

    (ii) treated as the income, profits or gains ofthe beneficiaries, members or participants

    of that entity under the tax law of theother Contracting State,

    shall be eligible for the benefits of theConvention that would be granted if it weredirectly derived by a beneficiary, member orparticipant of that entity who is a resident ofthat other Contracting State, to the extent thatsuch beneficiaries, members or participants areresidents of that other Contracting State andsatisfy any other conditions specified in theConvention, without regard to whether the income,profits or gains are treated as the income,

    profits or gains of such beneficiaries, membersor participants under the tax law of the first-mentioned Contracting State or such state.

    d) an item of income, profits or gains:

    (i) derived from a Contracting State through anentity that is organised in a state otherthan the Contracting States; and

    (ii) treated as the income, profits or gains ofthat entity under the tax law of the other

    Contracting State,

    shall not be eligible for the benefits of theConvention.

    e) an item of income, profits or gains:

    (i) derived from a Contracting State through anentity that is organised in that ContractingState; and

    (ii) treated as the income, profits or gains ofthat entity under the tax law of the otherContracting State,

    shall not be eligible for the benefits of theConvention.

    Article 5PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT

    1. For the purposes of this Convention, the termpermanent establishment means a fixed place of businessthrough which the business of the enterprise is wholly orpartly carried on.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    8/51

    8

    2. The term permanent establishment includesespecially:

    a) a place of management;

    b) a branch;

    c) an office;

    d) a factory;

    e) a workshop;

    f) a mine, an oil or gas well, a quarry or any otherplace of extraction of natural resources; and

    g) an agricultural, pastoral or forestry property.

    3. A building site or construction or installationproject constitutes a permanent establishment only if itlasts more than 12 months.

    4. Notwithstanding the preceding paragraphs of thisArticle, where an enterprise of a Contracting State:

    a) undertakes supervisory or consultancy activitiesin the other Contracting State in connection with

    a building site or construction or installationproject which is being undertaken in that otherContracting State, and those activities last morethan 12 months;

    b) carries on activities (including the operation ofsubstantial equipment) in the other ContractingState in the exploration for or exploitation ofnatural resources situated in that otherContracting State for a period or periodsexceeding in the aggregate 90 days in any 12month period; or

    c) operates substantial equipment in the otherContracting State (other than as provided insubparagraph b)) for a period or periodsexceeding in the aggregate 183 days in any 12month period,

    such activities shall be deemed to be performed through apermanent establishment that the enterprise has in thatother Contracting State.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    9/51

    9

    5. a) The duration of activities under paragraphs 3 and4 shall be determined by aggregating the periods

    during which activities are carried on in aContracting State by associated enterprisesprovided that the activities carried on in thatContracting State by an enterprise are connectedwith the activities carried on in thatContracting State by its associated enterprise.

    b) The period during which two or more associatedenterprises are carrying on concurrent activitiesshall be counted only once for the purpose ofdetermining the duration of activities.

    c) For the purposes of this Article, an enterprise

    shall be deemed to be associated with anotherenterprise if:

    (i) an enterprise participates directly orindirectly in the management, control orcapital of the other enterprise; or

    (ii) the same persons participate directly orindirectly in the management, control orcapital of the enterprises.

    6. Notwithstanding the preceding paragraphs of this

    Article, an enterprise shall not be deemed to have apermanent establishment merely by reason of:

    a) the use of facilities solely for the purpose ofstorage, display or delivery of goods ormerchandise belonging to the enterprise;

    b) the maintenance of a stock of goods ormerchandise belonging to the enterprise solelyfor the purpose of storage, display or delivery;

    c) the maintenance of a stock of goods ormerchandise belonging to the enterprise solelyfor the purpose of processing by anotherenterprise;

    d) the maintenance of a fixed place of businesssolely for the purpose of purchasing goods ormerchandise or of collecting information, for theenterprise; or

    e) the maintenance of a fixed place of businesssolely for the purpose of carrying on, for theenterprise, any other activity of a preparatoryor auxiliary character.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    10/51

    10

    7. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2,where a person other than an agent of an independent

    status to whom the provisions of paragraph 8 apply isacting on behalf of an enterprise and:

    a) has, and habitually exercises, in a ContractingState an authority to substantially negotiate onbehalf of or conclude contracts in the name ofthe enterprise; or

    b) manufactures or processes in a Contracting Statefor the enterprise goods or merchandise belongingto the enterprise,

    that enterprise shall be deemed to have a permanent

    establishment in that Contracting State in respect of anyactivities which that person undertakes for thatenterprise, unless the activities are limited to thosementioned in paragraph 6 which, if exercised through afixed place of business, would not make this fixed place ofbusiness a permanent establishment under paragraph 1.

    8. An enterprise shall not be deemed to have a permanentestablishment in a Contracting State merely because itcarries on business in that Contracting State through aperson who is a broker, general commission agent or anyother agent of an independent status, provided that the

    person is acting in the ordinary course of the personsbusiness as such a broker or agent.

    9. The fact that a company which is a resident of aContracting State controls or is controlled by a companywhich is a resident of the other Contracting State, orwhich carries on business in that other Contracting State(whether through a permanent establishment or otherwise),shall not of itself constitute either company a permanentestablishment of the other.

    10. The principles set forth in the preceding paragraphsof this Article shall be applied in determining for thepurposes of paragraph 7 of Article 11 and paragraph 5 ofArticle 12 whether there is a permanent establishment in astate other than the Contracting States, and whether anenterprise, not being an enterprise of either of theContracting States, has a permanent establishment in aContracting State.

    Article 6INCOME FROM REAL PROPERTY

    1. Income derived by a resident of a Contracting Statefrom real property situated in the other Contracting State

    may be taxed in that other Contracting State.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    11/51

    11

    2. The term real property shall have the meaning whichit has under the law of the Contracting State in which the

    property in question is situated. The term shall in anycase include:

    a) a lease of land and any other interest in or overland, whether improved or not;

    b) property accessory to real property;

    c) rights to which the provisions of general lawrespecting landed property apply;

    d) usufruct of real property;

    e) rights to explore for mineral, oil or gasdeposits or other natural resources, and a rightto work those deposits or resources; and

    f) rights to receive variable or fixed paymentseither as consideration for or in respect of theexploitation of, or the right to explore for orexploit, mineral, oil or gas deposits, quarriesor other places of extraction or exploitation ofnatural resources.

    Ships and aircraft shall not be regarded as real property.

    3. Any interest or right referred to in paragraph 2 shallbe regarded as situated where the land, mineral, oil or gasdeposits, quarries or natural resources, as the case maybe, are situated or where the exploration may take place.

    4. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall apply to incomederived from the direct use, letting, or use in any otherform of real property.

    5. The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 shall alsoapply to the income from real property of an enterprise.

    Article 7BUSINESS PROFITS

    1. The profits of an enterprise of a Contracting Stateshall be taxable only in that Contracting State unless theenterprise carries on business in the other ContractingState through a permanent establishment situated therein.If the enterprise carries on business as aforesaid, theprofits of the enterprise may be taxed in that otherContracting State but only so much of them as isattributable to that permanent establishment.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    12/51

    12

    2. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, where anenterprise of a Contracting State carries on business in

    the other Contracting State through a permanentestablishment situated therein, there shall in eachContracting State be attributed to that permanentestablishment the profits which it might be expected tomake if it were a distinct and separate enterprise engagedin the same or similar activities under the same or similarconditions and dealing wholly independently with theenterprise of which it is a permanent establishment or withother enterprises with which it deals.

    3. In determining the profits of a permanentestablishment, there shall be allowed as deductionsexpenses of the enterprise, being expenses which are

    incurred for the purposes of the permanent establishment,including executive and general administrative expenses soincurred, and which would be deductible if the permanentestablishment were an independent enterprise which paidthose expenses, whether incurred in the Contracting Statein which the permanent establishment is situated orelsewhere.

    4. Nothing in this Article shall affect the applicationof any law of a Contracting State relating to thedetermination of the tax liability of a person in caseswhere the information available to the competent authority

    of that Contracting State is inadequate to determine theprofits to be attributed to a permanent establishment,provided that, on the basis of the available information,the determination of the profits of the permanentestablishment is consistent with the principles stated inthis Article.

    5. No profits shall be attributed to a permanentestablishment by reason of the mere purchase by thatpermanent establishment of goods or merchandise for theenterprise.

    6. For the purposes of the preceding paragraphs of thisArticle, the profits to be attributed to the permanentestablishment shall be determined by the same method yearby year unless there is good and sufficient reason to thecontrary.

    7. Where profits include items of income or gains whichare dealt with separately in other Articles of thisConvention, then the provisions of those Articles shall notbe affected by the provisions of this Article.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    13/51

    13

    8. Nothing in this Article shall affect the applicationof any law of a Contracting State relating to tax imposed

    on profits from insurance with a person other than aresident of that Contracting State.

    9. Where:

    a) a resident of a Contracting State is beneficiallyentitled, whether directly or through one or moreinterposed trusts, to a share of the profitsderived from business carried on in the otherContracting State by the trustee of a trust(other than a trust which is treated as a companyfor tax purposes) in its capacity as trustee; and

    b) in relation to the carrying on of the business,that trustee, in accordance with the principlesstated in Article 5, has a permanentestablishment in that other Contracting State,

    the business carried on by the trustee shall be deemed tobe a business carried on in that other Contracting State bythat resident through a permanent establishment situatedtherein and the share of the profits shall be attributed tothat permanent establishment.

    Article 8

    SHIPPING AND AIR TRANSPORT

    1. Profits of an enterprise of a Contracting Statederived from the operation of ships or aircraft ininternational traffic shall be taxable only in thatContracting State.

    2. Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 2, providedthat no political subdivision or local authority ofAustralia levies a tax similar to the local inhabitanttaxes or the enterprise tax in Japan in respect of theoperation of ships or aircraft in international trafficcarried on by an enterprise of Japan, an enterprise ofAustralia shall be exempt from the local inhabitant taxesand the enterprise tax in Japan in respect of the operationof ships or aircraft in international traffic.

    3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, profitsof an enterprise of a Contracting State derived from theoperation of ships or aircraft may be taxed in the otherContracting State to the extent that they are profitsderived directly or indirectly from the operation of shipsor aircraft confined solely to places in that otherContracting State.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    14/51

    14

    4. For the purposes of this Article, profits derived fromthe carriage by ships or aircraft of passengers, livestock,

    mail, goods or merchandise which are shipped in aContracting State and are discharged at a place in thatContracting State shall be treated as profits from theoperation of ships or aircraft confined solely to places inthat Contracting State.

    5. The provisions of the preceding paragraphs of thisArticle shall also apply to profits from the operation ofships or aircraft derived through participation in a poolservice, joint business or other profit sharingarrangement.

    Article 9

    ASSOCIATED ENTERPRISES

    1. Where:

    a) an enterprise of a Contracting State participatesdirectly or indirectly in the management, controlor capital of an enterprise of the otherContracting State; or

    b) the same persons participate directly orindirectly in the management, control or capitalof an enterprise of a Contracting State and an

    enterprise of the other Contracting State,

    and in either case conditions operate between the twoenterprises in their commercial or financial relationswhich differ from those which might be expected to operatebetween independent enterprises dealing whollyindependently with one another, then any profits which, butfor those conditions, might have been expected to haveaccrued to one of the enterprises, but, by reason of thoseconditions, have not so accrued, may be included in theprofits of that enterprise and taxed accordingly.

    2. Nothing in this Article, other than paragraph 4, shallaffect the application of any law of a Contracting Staterelating to the determination of the tax liability of aperson in cases where the information available to thecompetent authority of that Contracting State is inadequateto determine the profits accruing to an enterprise,provided that, on the basis of the available information,the determination of that tax liability of the enterpriseis consistent with the principles stated in paragraph 1.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    15/51

    15

    3. Where a Contracting State includes, in accordance withthe provisions of paragraph 1 or 2, in the profits of an

    enterprise of that Contracting State - and taxesaccordingly - profits on which an enterprise of the otherContracting State has been charged to tax in that otherContracting State and where the competent authorities ofthe Contracting States agree, upon consultation, that allor part of the profits so included are profits which mighthave been expected to have accrued to the enterprise of thefirst-mentioned Contracting State if the conditionsoperative between the two enterprises had been those whichmight have been expected to have operated betweenindependent enterprises dealing wholly independently withone another, then the other Contracting State shall make anappropriate adjustment to the amount of the tax charged

    therein on those agreed profits. In determining suchadjustment, due regard shall be had to the other provisionsof this Convention.

    4. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2,a Contracting State shall not change the profits of anenterprise of that Contracting State in the circumstancesreferred to in those paragraphs, if an enquiry into theprofits of that enterprise is not initiated within sevenyears from the end of the taxable year in which the profitsthat would be subject to such change, but for theconditions referred to in those paragraphs, might have been

    expected to have accrued to that enterprise. Theprovisions of this paragraph shall not apply in the case offraud or wilful default or if the inability to initiate anenquiry within the prescribed period is attributable to theactions or inaction of that enterprise.

    Article 10DIVIDENDS

    1. Dividends paid by a company which is a resident of aContracting State for the purposes of its tax, beingdividends beneficially owned by a resident of the otherContracting State, may be taxed in that other ContractingState.

    2. However, such dividends may also be taxed in theContracting State of which the company paying the dividendsis a resident for the purposes of its tax and according tothe law of that Contracting State, but the tax so chargedshall not exceed:

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    16/51

    16

    a) 5 per cent of the gross amount of the dividendsif the beneficial owner of the dividends is a

    company which owns directly shares representingat least 10 per cent of the voting power of thecompany paying the dividends;

    b) 10 per cent of the gross amount of the dividendsin all other cases.

    3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2,dividends shall not be taxed in the Contracting State ofwhich the company paying the dividends is a resident forthe purposes of its tax if the beneficial owner of thedividends is a company that is a resident of the otherContracting State and that has owned directly shares

    representing at least 80 per cent of the voting power ofthe company paying the dividends for the 12 month periodending on the date on which entitlement to the dividends isdetermined and the company that is the beneficial owner ofthe dividends:

    a) is a qualified person by reason of the provisionsof subparagraph c) of paragraph 2 of Article 23;

    b) has at least 50 per cent of the aggregate voteand value of its shares owned directly orindirectly by five or fewer companies referred to

    in subparagraph a); or

    c) is granted benefits with respect to thosedividends under paragraph 5 of Article 23.

    4. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3,dividends paid by a company that is a resident of Japan andthat is entitled to a deduction for dividends paid to itsbeneficiaries in computing its taxable income in Japan,being dividends beneficially owned by a resident ofAustralia, may also be taxed in Japan according to the lawof Japan, but the tax so charged shall not exceed:

    a) 15 per cent of the gross amount of the dividendsif more than 50 percent of the assets of suchcompany consist, directly or indirectly, of realproperty situated in Japan;

    b) 10 per cent of the gross amount of the dividendsin all other cases.

    5. The provisions of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 shall notaffect the taxation of the company in respect of theprofits out of which the dividends are paid.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    17/51

    17

    6. The term "dividends" as used in this Article meansincome from shares or other rights, not being debt-claims,

    participating in profits, as well as income or otherdistributions which are subjected to the same taxationtreatment as income from shares by the law of theContracting State of which the company making thedistribution is a resident for the purposes of its tax.

    7. a) Distributions of income, profits or gains by aReal Estate Investment Trust (hereinafterreferred to as a "REIT"), being distributionsbeneficially owned by a resident of Japan, may betaxed in Japan.

    b) However, such distributions may also be taxed in

    Australia according to the law of Australia, butthe tax so charged shall not exceed 15 per centof the gross amount of the distributions if thebeneficial owner of the distributions is aresident of Japan other than a beneficial ownerof the distributions which holds, or has held atany time in the 12 month period preceding thedate on which the distributions are made,directly or indirectly, capital that representsat least 10 percent of the value of all thecapital in the REIT.

    c) For the purposes of this paragraph, the term"Real Estate Investment Trust" means a managedinvestment trust created or organised under thelaws of Australia which carries on a businessconsisting of investment, directly or indirectly,in real property for the main purpose of derivingrent.

    8. The provisions of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 shallnot apply if the beneficial owner of the dividends ordistributions, being a resident of a Contracting State,carries on business in the other Contracting State of whichthe company paying the dividends is a resident for thepurposes of its tax (or, in the case of a REIT to whichparagraph 7 applies, in Australia) through a permanentestablishment situated therein and the holding in respectof which the dividends or distributions are paid iseffectively connected with such permanent establishment.In such case the provisions of Article 7 shall apply.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    18/51

    18

    9. Where a company which is a resident of a ContractingState derives profits or income from the other Contracting

    State, that other Contracting State may not impose any taxon the dividends paid by the company being dividendsbeneficially owned by a person who is not a resident ofthat other Contracting State except insofar as theholding in respect of which such dividends are paid iseffectively connected with a permanent establishmentsituated in that other Contracting State, nor subject thecompanys undistributed profits to a tax on the companysundistributed profits, even if the dividends paid or theundistributed profits consist wholly or partly of profitsor income arising in that other Contracting State.However, in the case of dividends paid by a company whichis deemed to be a resident only of a Contracting State by

    reason of the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 4, theother Contracting State may tax such dividends to theextent that they are paid out of profits or income arisingin that other Contracting State and, in the case ofdividends beneficially owned by a resident of the first-mentioned Contracting State, according to the provisions ofparagraphs 2 or 3.

    10. A resident of a Contracting State shall not beconsidered the beneficial owner of the dividends paid by aresident of the other Contracting State for the purposes ofits tax in respect of preferred shares or other similar

    interests if such preferred shares or other similarinterests might not have been expected to have beenestablished or acquired unless a person:

    a) that is not entitled to benefits with respect todividends paid by a resident of that otherContracting State which are equivalent to, ormore favourable than, those available under thisConvention to a resident of the first-mentionedContracting State; and

    b) that is not a resident of either ContractingState,

    owned equivalent preferred shares or other similarinterests in the first-mentioned resident.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    19/51

    19

    11. No relief shall be available under this Article if itwas the main purpose or one of the main purposes of any

    person concerned with the assignment of the dividends ordistributions, the creation or assignment of the shares orother rights in respect of which the dividends ordistributions are paid, or the establishment, acquisitionor maintenance of the company which is the beneficial ownerof the dividends or distributions or the conduct of itsoperations to take advantage of this Article.

    Article 11INTEREST

    1. Interest arising in a Contracting State andbeneficially owned by a resident of the other Contracting

    State may be taxed in that other Contracting State.

    2. However, such interest may also be taxed in theContracting State in which it arises and according to thelaw of that Contracting State, but the tax so charged shallnot exceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the interest.

    3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2,interest arising in a Contracting State and beneficiallyowned by a resident of the other Contracting State shallnot be taxed in the first-mentioned Contracting State if:

    a) the interest is derived by a Contracting State ora political subdivision or local authoritythereof, by any other body exercisinggovernmental functions in a Contracting State, orby the Bank of Japan or the Reserve Bank ofAustralia;

    b) the interest is derived by a financialinstitution which is unrelated to and dealingwholly independently with the payer. For thepurpose of this Article, the term "financialinstitution" means a bank or other enterprisesubstantially deriving its profits by raisingdebt finance in the financial markets or takingdeposits at interest and by using those funds incarrying on a business of providing finance; or

    c) the interest is derived by:

    (i) in the case of Japan, the Japan Bank forInternational Cooperation, or the NipponExport and Investment Insurance;

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    20/51

    20

    (ii) in the case of Australia, the Export Financeand Insurance Corporation, or a public

    authority that manages the investments ofthe Future Fund; and

    (iii) any similar institution as may be agreedupon from time to time between theGovernments of the Contracting Statesthrough an exchange of diplomatic notes.

    4. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 3,interest referred to in subparagraph b) of that paragraphmay be taxed in the Contracting State in which it arises ata rate not exceeding 10 per cent of the gross amount of theinterest if the interest is paid as part of an arrangement

    involving back-to-back loans or other arrangement that iseconomically equivalent and intended to have a similareffect to an arrangement involving back-to-back loans.

    5. The term "interest" as used in this Article meansincome from debt-claims of every kind, whether or notsecured by mortgage and whether or not carrying a right toparticipate in the debtors profits, and in particular,interest from government securities and interest from bondsor debentures, including premiums and prizes attaching tosuch securities, bonds or debentures, and all other incomethat is subjected to the same taxation treatment as income

    from money lent by the tax law of the Contracting State inwhich the income arises. Income dealt with in Article 10shall not be regarded as interest for the purposes of thisConvention.

    6. The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2, subparagraph b)of paragraph 3 and paragraph 4 shall not apply if thebeneficial owner of the interest, being a resident of aContracting State, carries on business in the otherContracting State in which the interest arises through apermanent establishment situated therein and the debt-claims or other rights in respect of which the interest ispaid is effectively connected with such permanentestablishment. In such case the provisions of Article 7shall apply.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    21/51

    21

    7. Interest shall be deemed to arise in a ContractingState when the payer is a resident of that Contracting

    State for the purposes of its tax. Where, however, theperson paying interest, whether such person is a residentof a Contracting State or not, has in a Contracting Stateor a state other than the Contracting States a permanentestablishment in connection with which the indebtedness onwhich the interest is paid were incurred, and such interestis borne by such permanent establishment, then:

    a) if the permanent establishment is situated in aContracting State, such interest shall be deemedto arise in that Contracting State; and

    b) if the permanent establishment is situated in a

    state other than the Contracting States, suchinterest shall not be deemed to arise in eitherContracting State.

    8. Where, by reason of a special relationship between thepayer and the beneficial owner of the interest, or betweenboth of them and some other person, the amount of theinterest, having regard to the debt-claims or other rightsfor which it is paid, exceeds the amount which might havebeen expected to have been agreed upon by the payer and thebeneficial owner in the absence of such relationship, theprovisions of this Article shall apply only to the last-

    mentioned amount. In such case, the excess part of thepayments shall remain taxable according to the law of eachContracting State, due regard being had to the otherprovisions of this Convention.

    9. A resident of a Contracting State shall not beconsidered the beneficial owner of the interest arising inthe other Contracting State in respect of a debt-claim orother right if such debt-claim or other right might nothave been expected to have been established unless aperson:

    a) that is not entitled to benefits with respect tothe interest arising in that other ContractingState which are equivalent to, or more favourablethan, those available under this Convention to aresident of the first-mentioned ContractingState; and

    b) that is not a resident of either ContractingState,

    owned an equivalent debt-claim or other right against thefirst-mentioned resident.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    22/51

    22

    10. No relief shall be available under this Article if itwas the main purpose or one of the main purposes of any

    person concerned with the assignment of the interest, thecreation or assignment of the debt-claim or other rights inrespect of which the interest is paid, or theestablishment, acquisition or maintenance of the companywhich is the beneficial owner of the interest or theconduct of its operations to take advantage of thisArticle.

    Article 12ROYALTIES

    1. Royalties arising in a Contracting State andbeneficially owned by a resident of the other Contracting

    State may be taxed in that other Contracting State.

    2. However, such royalties may also be taxed in theContracting State in which they arise and according to thelaw of that Contracting State, but the tax so charged shallnot exceed 5 per cent of the gross amount of the royalties.

    3. The term "royalties" as used in this Article meanspayments or credits, whether periodical or not, and howeverdescribed or computed, to the extent to which they are madeas consideration for:

    a) the use of, or the right to use, any copyright,patent, design or model, plan, secret formula orprocess, trademark or other like property orright;

    b) the supply of scientific, technical, industrialor commercial knowledge or information;

    c) the supply of any assistance that is ancillaryand subsidiary to, and is furnished as a means ofenabling the application or enjoyment of, anysuch property or right as is mentioned insubparagraph a) or any such knowledge orinformation as is mentioned in subparagraph b);

    d) the use of, or the right to use:

    (i) motion picture films; or

    (ii) films or audio or video tapes or disks, orany other means of image or soundreproduction or transmission for use inconnection with television, radio or otherbroadcasting; or

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    23/51

    23

    e) total or partial forbearance in respect of theuse or supply of any property or right referred

    to in this paragraph.

    4. The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not applyif the beneficial owner of the royalties, being a residentof a Contracting State, carries on business in the otherContracting State in which the royalties arise through apermanent establishment situated therein and the propertyor right in respect of which the royalties are paid orcredited is effectively connected with such permanentestablishment. In such case the provisions of Article 7shall apply.

    5. Royalties shall be deemed to arise in a Contracting

    State when the payer is a resident of that ContractingState for the purposes of its tax. Where, however, theperson paying royalties, whether such person is a residentof a Contracting State or not, has in a Contracting Stateor a state other than the Contracting States a permanentestablishment in connection with which the liability to payor credit the royalties was incurred, and such royaltiesare borne by such permanent establishment, then:

    a) if the permanent establishment is situated in aContracting State, such royalties shall be deemedto arise in that Contracting State; and

    b) if the permanent establishment is situated in astate other than the Contracting States, suchroyalties shall not be deemed to arise in eitherContracting State.

    6. Where, by reason of a special relationship between thepayer and the beneficial owner of the royalties, or betweenboth of them and some other person, the amount of theroyalties, having regard to what they are paid or creditedfor, exceeds the amount which might have been expected tohave been agreed upon by the payer and the beneficial ownerin the absence of such relationship, the provisions of thisArticle shall apply only to the last-mentioned amount. Insuch case, the excess part of the payments or credits shallremain taxable according to the law of each ContractingState, due regard being had to the other provisions of thisConvention.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    24/51

    24

    7. A resident of a Contracting State shall not beconsidered the beneficial owner of the royalties arising in

    the other Contracting State in respect of the use of theproperty or right if such royalties might not have beenexpected to have been paid to the resident unless theresident paid royalties in respect of the same property orright to a person:

    a) that is not entitled to benefits with respect toroyalties arising in that other Contracting Statewhich are equivalent to, or more favourable than,those available under this Convention to aresident of the first-mentioned ContractingState; and

    b) that is not a resident of either ContractingState.

    8. No relief shall be available under this Article if itwas the main purpose or one of the main purposes of anyperson concerned with the assignment of the royalties, thecreation or assignment of the property or right in respectof which the royalties are paid, or the establishment,acquisition or maintenance of the company which is thebeneficial owner of the royalties or the conduct of itsoperations to take advantage of this Article.

    Article 13ALIENATION OF PROPERTY

    1. Income, profits or gains derived by a resident of aContracting State from the alienation of real propertyreferred to in Article 6 and situated in the otherContracting State may be taxed in that other ContractingState.

    2. Income, profits or gains derived by a resident of aContracting State from the alienation of shares in acompany or of interests in a partnership, trust or otherentity may be taxed in the other Contracting State wherethe shares or the interests derive at least 50 per cent oftheir value directly or indirectly from real propertyreferred to in Article 6 and situated in that otherContracting State.

    3. Unless the provisions of paragraph 2 are applicable,income, profits or gains derived by a resident of aContracting State which are not subject to tax in thatContracting State from the alienation of shares issued by acompany being a resident of the other Contracting State maybe taxed in that other Contracting State, if:

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    25/51

    25

    a) shares owned by the alienator (together with suchshares owned by any other related or connected

    persons as may be aggregated therewith) amount toat least 25 per cent of the total issued sharesof such company at any time during the taxableyear in which the alienation takes place; and

    b) the total of the shares alienated by thealienator and such related or connected personsduring that taxable year in which the alienationtakes place amounts to at least 5 per cent of thetotal issued shares of such company.

    4. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 3, income,profits or gains from the alienation of property (other

    than real property) that forms part of the businessproperty of a permanent establishment which an enterpriseof a Contracting State has in the other Contracting State,including income, profits or gains from the alienation ofthat permanent establishment (alone or with the wholeenterprise), may be taxed in that other Contracting State.

    5. Income, profits or gains derived by an enterprise of aContracting State from the alienation of ships or aircraftoperated by that enterprise in international traffic, or ofproperty (other than real property) pertaining to theoperation of such ships or aircraft, shall be taxable only

    in that Contracting State.

    6. Gains from the alienation of any property other thanthat referred to in the preceding paragraphs of thisArticle shall be taxable only in the Contracting State ofwhich the alienator is a resident.

    Article 14INCOME FROM EMPLOYMENT

    1. Subject to the provisions of Articles 15, 17 and 18,salaries, wages and other similar remuneration derived by aresident of a Contracting State in respect of an employmentshall be taxable only in that Contracting State unless theemployment is exercised in the other Contracting State. Ifthe employment is so exercised, such remuneration as isderived therefrom may be taxed in that other ContractingState.

    2. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1,remuneration derived by a resident of a Contracting Statein respect of an employment exercised in the otherContracting State shall be taxable only in the first-mentioned Contracting State if:

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    26/51

    26

    a) the recipient is present in the other ContractingState for a period or periods not exceeding in

    the aggregate 183 days in any 12 month periodcommencing or ending in the taxable year of thatother Contracting State;

    b) the remuneration is paid by, or on behalf of, anemployer who is not a resident of the otherContracting State; and

    c) the remuneration is not borne by a permanentestablishment which the employer has in the otherContracting State.

    3. Notwithstanding the preceding paragraphs of this

    Article, remuneration derived in respect of an employmentexercised aboard a ship or aircraft operated ininternational traffic by an enterprise of a ContractingState may be taxed in that Contracting State.

    Article 15DIRECTORS FEES

    Directors fees and other similar payments derived bya person who is a resident of a Contracting State in thatpersons capacity as a member of the board of directors ofa company which is a resident of the other Contracting

    State may be taxed in that other Contracting State.

    Article 16ENTERTAINERS AND SPORTSPERSONS

    1. Notwithstanding the provisions of Articles 7 and 14,income derived by a person who is a resident of aContracting State as an entertainer, such as a theatre,motion picture, radio or television artiste, or a musician,or as a sportsperson, from that persons personalactivities as such exercised in the other ContractingState, may be taxed in that other Contracting State.

    2. Where income in respect of personal activitiesexercised by an entertainer or a sportsperson in thatpersons capacity as such accrues not to that person but toanother person, that income may, notwithstanding theprovisions of Articles 7 and 14, be taxed in theContracting State in which the activities of theentertainer or sportsperson are exercised.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    27/51

    27

    Article 17PENSIONS AND ANNUITIES

    1. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article18, pensions and other similar remuneration paidperiodically to an individual who is a resident of aContracting State shall be taxable only in that ContractingState.

    2. Annuities paid to an individual who is a resident of aContracting State shall be taxable only in that ContractingState.

    3. Lump sums in lieu of the right to receive a pension orother similar remuneration, or to receive an annuity, paid

    to an individual who is a resident of a Contracting Stateshall be taxable only in that Contracting State. However,such lump sums may also be taxed in the other ContractingState if they arise in that other Contracting State.

    4. The term annuity means a stated sum payableperiodically at stated times during the life or during aspecified or ascertainable period of time under anobligation to make the payments in return for adequate andfull consideration in money or moneys worth.

    Article 18

    GOVERNMENT SERVICE

    1. a) Salaries, wages and other similar remunerationpaid by a Contracting State or a politicalsubdivision or local authority thereof to anindividual in respect of services rendered tothat Contracting State or political subdivisionor local authority, in the discharge of functionsof a governmental nature, shall be taxable onlyin that Contracting State.

    b) However, such salaries, wages and other similarremuneration shall be taxable only in the otherContracting State if the services are rendered inthat other Contracting State and the individualis a resident of that other Contracting Statewho:

    (i) is a national of that other ContractingState; or

    (ii) did not become a resident of that otherContracting State solely for the purpose ofrendering the services.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    28/51

    28

    2. a) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1,pensions and other similar remuneration paid

    periodically by, or out of funds to whichcontributions are made or created by, aContracting State or a political subdivision orlocal authority thereof to an individual inrespect of services rendered to that ContractingState or political subdivision or local authorityshall be taxable only in that Contracting State.

    b) However, such pensions and other similarremuneration shall be taxable only in the otherContracting State if the individual is a residentof, and a national of, that other ContractingState.

    3. The provisions of Articles 14, 15, 16 and 17 shallapply to salaries, wages, pensions, and other similarremuneration in respect of services rendered in connectionwith a business carried on by a Contracting State or apolitical subdivision or local authority thereof.

    Article 19STUDENTS

    Payments which a student or business apprentice who isor was immediately before visiting a Contracting State a

    resident of the other Contracting State and who istemporarily present in the first-mentioned ContractingState solely for the purpose of that persons education ortraining receives for the purpose of that personsmaintenance, education or training shall not be taxed inthe first-mentioned Contracting State, provided that suchpayments arise from sources outside that first-mentionedContracting State. The exemption provided by this Articleshall apply to a business apprentice only for a period notexceeding one year from the date the person first beginsthat persons training in the first-mentioned ContractingState.

    Article 20SLEEPING PARTNERSHIP (TOKUMEI KUMIAI)

    Notwithstanding any other provisions of thisConvention, other than those of Article 26, any income,profits or gains derived by a sleeping partner in respectof a sleeping partnership (Tokumei Kumiai) contract orother similar contract may be taxed in the ContractingState in which such income, profits or gains arise, andaccording to the laws of that Contracting State.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    29/51

    29

    Article 21OTHER INCOME

    1. Items of income of a resident of a Contracting State,wherever arising, not dealt with in the foregoing Articlesof this Convention shall be taxable only in thatContracting State.

    2. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply toincome, other than income from real property as defined inparagraph 2 of Article 6, derived by a resident of aContracting State who carries on business in the otherContracting State through a permanent establishmentsituated therein and the property or right in respect ofwhich the income is paid is effectively connected with such

    permanent establishment. In such case the provisions ofArticle 7 shall apply.

    3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2,items of income of a resident of a Contracting State notdealt with in the foregoing Articles of this Conventionfrom sources in the other Contracting State may also betaxed in that other Contracting State.

    Article 22SOURCE OF INCOME

    1. Income, profits or gains derived by a resident of aContracting State which, under any one or more of Articles6 to 8 and 10 to 18, may be taxed in the other ContractingState shall for the purposes of the law of that otherContracting State relating to its tax be deemed to arisefrom sources in that other Contracting State.

    2. Income, profits or gains derived by a resident of aContracting State which, under any one or more of Articles6 to 8, 10 to 18 and 20, may be taxed in the otherContracting State shall for the purposes of Article 25 andof the law of the first-mentioned Contracting Staterelating to its tax be deemed to arise from sources in theother Contracting State.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    30/51

    30

    Article 23LIMITATION ON BENEFITS

    1. Except as otherwise provided in this Article, aresident of a Contracting State that derives income,profits or gains described in Article 7; in paragraph 3 ofArticle 10 or paragraph 3 of Article 11; or in Article 13from the other Contracting State shall be entitled to thebenefits granted for a taxable year by the provisions ofthose paragraphs or Articles only if such resident is aqualified person as defined in paragraph 2 and satisfiesany other specified conditions in those paragraphs orArticles for the obtaining of such benefits.

    2. A resident of a Contracting State shall be a qualified

    person for a taxable year only if such resident is either:

    a) an individual;

    b) a qualified governmental entity;

    c) a company (including a company participating in adual listed company arrangement), if itsprincipal class of shares is listed or registeredon a recognised stock exchange specified inclause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph d) ofparagraph 6 and is regularly traded on one or

    more recognised stock exchanges;

    d) a person other than an individual or a company,if the principal class of units in that person islisted or admitted to dealings on a recognisedstock exchange specified in clause (i) or (ii) ofsubparagraph d) of paragraph 6 and is regularlytraded on one or more recognised stock exchanges;

    e) a pension fund, provided that as of the end ofthe prior taxable year more than 50 per cent ofits beneficiaries, members or participants areindividuals who are residents of eitherContracting State;

    f) an organisation established under the law of thatContracting State and operated exclusively for areligious, charitable, educational, scientific,artistic, cultural or public purposes, providedthat all or part of its income, profits or gainsmay be exempt from tax under the domestic law ofthat Contracting State; or

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    31/51

    31

    g) a person other than an individual, if residentsof either Contracting State that are qualified

    persons by reason of the provisions ofsubparagraphs a) to f) of this paragraph own,directly or indirectly, at least 50 per cent ofthe aggregate vote and value of the shares of theperson, or at least 50 per cent of the beneficialinterests in the person.

    3. Where the provisions of subparagraph g) of paragraph 2apply:

    a) in respect of taxation by withholding at source,a resident of a Contracting State shall beconsidered to satisfy the conditions described in

    that subparagraph for the taxable year in whichthe payment is made if such resident satisfiesthose conditions during the 12 month periodpreceding the date of payment of an item ofincome, profits or gains (or, in the case ofdividends, the date on which entitlement to thedividends is determined);

    b) in all other cases, a resident of a ContractingState shall be considered to satisfy theconditions described in that subparagraph for thetaxable year in which the payment is made if such

    resident satisfies those conditions on at leasthalf the days of the taxable year.

    4. a) Notwithstanding that a resident of a ContractingState may not be a qualified person, thatresident shall be entitled to the benefitsgranted by the provisions of Article 7; ofparagraph 3 of Article 10 or paragraph 3 ofArticle 11; or of Article 13 with respect to anitem of income, profits or gains described inthose paragraphs or Articles derived from theother Contracting State if the resident iscarrying on business in the first-mentionedContracting State (other than the business ofmaking or managing investments for the residentsown account, unless the business is banking,insurance or securities business carried on by abank, insurance company or securities dealer),the income, profits or gains derived from theother Contracting State are derived in connectionwith, or are incidental to, that business andthat resident satisfies any other specifiedconditions in those paragraphs or Articles forthe obtaining of such benefits.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    32/51

    32

    b) If a resident of a Contracting State derives anitem of income, profits or gains from a business

    carried on by that resident in the otherContracting State or derives an item of income,profits or gains arising in the other ContractingState from a person that has with the resident arelationship described in subparagraph a) or b)of paragraph 1 of Article 9, the conditionsdescribed in subparagraph a) of this paragraphshall be considered to be satisfied with respectto such an item of income, profits or gains onlyif the business carried on in the first-mentionedContracting State is substantial in relation tothe business carried on in the other ContractingState. Whether such business is substantial for

    the purpose of this paragraph shall be determinedon the basis of all the facts and circumstances.

    c) In determining whether a person is carrying onbusiness in a Contracting State undersubparagraph a) of this paragraph, the businessconducted by a partnership in which that personis a partner and the business conducted bypersons connected to such person shall be deemedto be conducted by such person. A person shallbe connected to another if one possesses,directly or indirectly, at least 50 per cent of

    the beneficial interests in the other (or, in thecase of a company, at least 50 per cent of theaggregate vote and value of the shares of thecompany) or another person possesses, directly orindirectly, at least 50 per cent of thebeneficial interests (or, in the case of acompany, at least 50 per cent of the aggregatevote and value of the shares of the company) ineach person. In any case, a person shall beconsidered to be connected to another if, on thebasis of all the facts and circumstances, one hascontrol of the other or both are under thecontrol of the same person or persons.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    33/51

    33

    5. A resident of a Contracting State that is neither aqualified person nor entitled under paragraph 4 to the

    benefits granted by the provisions of Article 7; ofparagraph 3 of Article 10 or paragraph 3 of Article 11; orof Article 13 with respect to an item of income, profits orgains described in those paragraphs or Articles shall,nevertheless, be granted such benefits if the competentauthority of the other Contracting State determines, inaccordance with its domestic law or administrativepractice, that the establishment, acquisition ormaintenance of such resident and the conduct of itsoperations are considered as not having the obtaining ofsuch benefits as one of the principal purposes.

    6. For the purposes of this Article:

    a) the term qualified governmental entity meansentities referred to in subparagraphs a) and c)of paragraph 3 of Article 11;

    b) the term principal class of shares means theordinary shares of the company, provided thatsuch class of shares represents the majority ofthe voting power and value of the company. If nosingle class of ordinary shares represents themajority of the voting power and value of thecompany, the principal class of shares is that

    class or those classes that in the aggregaterepresent a majority of the voting power andvalue of the company. For the purposes of thepreceding sentences, in the case of a companyparticipating in a dual listed companyarrangement, the principal class of shares willbe determined after excluding the special votingshares which were issued as a means ofestablishing that dual listed companyarrangement;

    c) the term dual listed company arrangement meansan arrangement pursuant to which two publiclylisted companies, while maintaining theirseparate legal entity status, shareholdings andlistings, align their strategic directions andthe economic interests of their respectiveshareholders through:

    (i) the appointment of common (or almostidentical) boards of directors;

    (ii) management of the operations of the twocompanies on a unified basis;

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    34/51

    34

    (iii) equalised distributions to shareholders inaccordance with an equalisation ratio

    applying between the two companies,including in the event of a winding up ofone or both of the companies;

    (iv) the shareholders of both companies voting ineffect as a single decision-making body onsubstantial issues affecting their combinedinterests; and

    (v) cross-guarantees as to, or similar financialsupport for, each others materialobligations or operations except where theeffect of the relevant regulatory

    requirements prevents such guarantees orfinancial support;

    d) the term recognised stock exchange means:

    (i) any stock exchange established by aFinancial Instruments Exchange or anapproved-type financial instruments firmsassociation under the terms of the FinancialInstruments and Exchange Law (Law No. 25 of1948) of Japan;

    (ii) the Australian Securities Exchange and anyother securities exchange recognised as suchunder the Corporations Act 2001 ofAustralia; and

    (iii) any other stock exchange which the competentauthorities of the Contracting States agreeto recognise for the purposes of thisArticle;

    e) the term units includes any instrument, notbeing a debt-claim, granting an entitlement toshare in the asset or income of, or receive adistribution from, the person;

    f) the term principal class of units means theclass of units which represents the majority ofthe value of the person. If no single class ofunits represents the majority of the value of theperson, the principal class of units is thatclass or those classes that in the aggregaterepresent the majority of the value of theperson; and

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    35/51

    35

    g) the term pension fund means any person that:

    (i)is established under the law of aContracting State; and

    (ii) is operated principally to administer orprovide pensions, retirement benefits orother similar remuneration or to earnincome, profits or gains for the benefit ofother pension funds.

    7. Nothing in this Article shall be construed asrestricting, in any manner, the application of anyprovisions of the law of a Contracting State which aredesigned to prevent the avoidance or evasion of taxes.

    Article 24LIMITATION OF RELIEF

    1. Where under this Convention any income, profits orgains are relieved from tax in a Contracting State and,under the law in force in the other Contracting State, anindividual, in respect of that income or those profits orgains, is taxed by reference to the amount thereof that isremitted to or received in that other Contracting State andnot by reference to the full amount thereof, then therelief to be allowed under the Convention in the first-

    mentioned Contracting State shall apply only to so much ofthat income or those profits or gains as is taxed in theother Contracting State.

    2. Where under this Convention any income, profits orgains are relieved from tax in a Contracting State and,under the law in force in the other Contracting State, anindividual, in respect of that income or those profits orgains, is exempt from tax by virtue of being a temporaryresident of that other Contracting State within the meaningof the applicable law of that other Contracting State, thenthe relief to be allowed under the Convention in the first-mentioned Contracting State shall not apply to the extentthat that income or those profits or gains are exempt fromtax in the other Contracting State.

    Article 25ELIMINATION OF DOUBLE TAXATION

    1. Subject to the provisions of the laws of Japanregarding the allowance as a credit against Japanese tax oftax payable in any country other than Japan:

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    36/51

    36

    a) Where a resident of Japan derives income fromAustralia which may be taxed in Australia in

    accordance with the provisions of thisConvention, the amount of Australian tax payablein respect of that income shall be allowed as acredit against the Japanese tax imposed on thatresident. The amount of credit, however, shallnot exceed that part of the Japanese tax which isappropriate to that income.

    b) Where the income derived from Australia isdividends paid by a company which is a residentof Australia to a company which is a resident ofJapan and which has owned at least 10 per centeither of the voting shares or of the total

    issued shares of the company paying the dividendsduring the period of six months immediatelybefore the day when the obligation to paydividends is confirmed, the credit shall takeinto account Australian tax payable by thecompany paying the dividends in respect of itsincome.

    2. Subject to the provisions of the law of Australia fromtime to time in force which relate to the allowance of acredit against Australian tax of tax paid in a countryoutside Australia (which shall not affect the general

    principle of this Article), Japanese tax paid under the lawof Japan and in accordance with this Convention, whetherdirectly or by deduction, in respect of income, profits orgains derived by a person who is a resident of Australiafrom sources in Japan shall be allowed as a credit againstAustralian tax payable in respect of that income, profitsor gains.

    Article 26NON-DISCRIMINATION

    1. Nationals of a Contracting State shall not besubjected in the other Contracting State to any taxation orany requirement connected therewith, which is other or moreburdensome than the taxation and connected requirements towhich nationals of that other Contracting State in the samecircumstances, in particular with respect to residence, areor may be subjected. The provisions of this paragraphshall, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 1, alsoapply to persons who are not residents of one or both ofthe Contracting States.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    37/51

    37

    2. The taxation on a permanent establishment which anenterprise of a Contracting State has in the other

    Contracting State shall not be less favourably levied inthat other Contracting State than the taxation levied onenterprises of that other Contracting State carrying on thesame activities in similar circumstances. The provisionsof this paragraph shall not be construed as obliging aContracting State to grant to individuals who are residentsof the other Contracting State any personal allowances,reliefs and reductions for taxation purposes which itgrants to its own residents.

    3. Except where the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article9, paragraph 8 of Article 11, or paragraph 6 of Article 12,apply, interest, royalties and other disbursements paid by

    an enterprise of a Contracting State to a resident of theother Contracting State shall, for the purpose ofdetermining the taxable profits of such enterprise, bedeductible under the same conditions as if they had beenpaid to a resident of the first-mentioned ContractingState.

    4. Enterprises of a Contracting State, the capital ofwhich is wholly or partly owned or controlled, directly orindirectly, by one or more residents of the otherContracting State, shall not be subjected in the first-mentioned Contracting State to any taxation or any

    requirement connected therewith which is other or moreburdensome than the taxation and connected requirements towhich other similar enterprises of the first-mentionedContracting State in similar circumstances are or may besubjected.

    5. The provisions of this Article shall, notwithstandingthe provisions of Article 2, apply to taxes of every kindand description imposed by a Contracting State or apolitical subdivision or local authority thereof.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    38/51

    38

    Article 27MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCEDURE

    1. Where a person considers that the actions of one orboth of the Contracting States result or will result forthe person in taxation not in accordance with theprovisions of this Convention, the person may, irrespectiveof the remedies provided by the domestic law of thoseContracting States, present a case to the competentauthority of the Contracting State of which the person is aresident or, if the case comes under paragraph 1 of Article26, to that of the Contracting State of which the person isa national. The case must be presented within three yearsfrom the first notification of the action resulting intaxation not in accordance with the provisions of the

    Convention.

    2. The competent authority shall endeavour, if the claimappears to it to be justified and if it is not itself ableto arrive at a satisfactory solution, to resolve the caseby mutual agreement with the competent authority of theother Contracting State, with a view to the avoidance oftaxation which is not in accordance with the provisions ofthis Convention. Any agreement reached shall beimplemented notwithstanding any time limits in the domesticlaw of the Contracting States.

    3. The competent authorities of the Contracting Statesshall endeavour to resolve by mutual agreement anydifficulties or doubts arising as to the interpretation orapplication of this Convention. They may also consulttogether for the elimination of double taxation in casesnot provided for in the Convention.

    4. The competent authorities of the Contracting Statesmay communicate with each other directly for the purpose ofreaching an agreement in the sense of the precedingparagraphs of this Article.

    5. For the purposes of paragraph 3 of Article XXII(Consultation) of the General Agreement on Trade inServices, the Contracting States agree that,notwithstanding the provisions of that paragraph, anydispute between them as to whether a measure falls withinthe scope of this Convention may be brought before theCouncil for Trade in Services, as provided by thatparagraph, only with the consent of both ContractingStates. Any doubt as to the interpretation of thisparagraph shall be resolved under paragraph 3 of thisArticle or, failing agreement under that procedure,pursuant to any other procedure agreed to by bothContracting States.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    39/51

    39

    Article 28EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION

    1. The competent authorities of the Contracting Statesshall exchange such information as is foreseeably relevantfor carrying out the provisions of this Convention or tothe administration or enforcement of the domestic lawconcerning taxes of every kind and description imposed onbehalf of the Contracting States, insofar as the taxationthereunder is not contrary to the Convention. The exchangeof information is not restricted by Articles 1 and 2.

    2. Any information received under paragraph 1 by aContracting State shall be treated as secret in the samemanner as information obtained under the domestic law of

    that Contracting State and shall be disclosed only topersons or authorities (including courts and administrativebodies) concerned with the assessment or collection of, theenforcement or prosecution in respect of, the determinationof appeals in relation to the taxes referred to inparagraph 1, or the oversight of the above. Such personsor authorities shall use the information only for suchpurposes. They may disclose the information in publiccourt proceedings or in judicial decisions.

    3. In no case shall the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2be construed so as to impose on a Contracting State the

    obligation:

    a) to carry out administrative measures at variancewith the law and administrative practice of thator of the other Contracting State;

    b) to supply information which is not obtainableunder the law or in the normal course of theadministration of that or of the otherContracting State;

    c) to supply information which would disclose anytrade, business, industrial, commercial orprofessional secret or trade process, orinformation, the disclosure of which would becontrary to public policy.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    40/51

    40

    4. If information is requested by a Contracting State inaccordance with this Article, the other Contracting State

    shall use its information gathering measures to obtain therequested information, even though that other ContractingState may not need such information for its own taxpurposes. The obligation contained in the precedingsentence is subject to the limitations of paragraph 3 butin no case shall such limitations be construed to permit aContracting State to decline to supply information solelybecause it has no domestic interest in such information.

    5. In no case shall the provisions of paragraph 3 beconstrued to permit a Contracting State to decline tosupply information solely because the information is heldby a bank, other financial institution, nominee or person

    acting in an agency or a fiduciary capacity or because itrelates to ownership interests in a person.

    Article 29MEMBERS OF DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS

    AND CONSULAR POSTS

    Nothing in this Convention shall affect the fiscalprivileges of members of diplomatic missions or consularposts under the general rules of international law or underthe provisions of special international agreements.

    Article 30HEADINGS

    The headings of the Articles of this Convention areinserted for convenience of reference only and shall notaffect the interpretation of the Convention.

    Article 31ENTRY INTO FORCE

    1. This Convention shall be approved in accordance withthe legal procedures of each of the Contracting States andshall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the dateof exchange of diplomatic notes indicating such approval.

    2. This Convention shall be applicable:

    a) in the case of Japan:

    (i) with respect to taxes withheld at source,for amounts taxable on or after 1 January inthe calendar year next following that inwhich the Convention enters into force;

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    41/51

    41

    (ii) with respect to taxes on income which arenot withheld at source, as regards income

    for any taxable year beginning on or after 1January in the calendar year next followingthat in which the Convention enters intoforce; and

    (iii) with respect to other taxes, as regardstaxes for any taxable year beginning on orafter 1 January in the calendar year nextfollowing that in which the Conventionenters into force; and

    b) in the case of Australia:

    (i) with respect to withholding tax on incomethat is derived by a resident of Japan, inrelation to income derived on or after 1January in the calendar year next followingthat in which the Convention enters intoforce; and

    (ii) with respect to other taxes, as regards anytaxable year beginning on or after 1 July inthe calendar year next following that inwhich the Convention enters into force.

    3. The Agreement between Japan and the Commonwealth ofAustralia for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and thePrevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes onIncome signed at Canberra on 20 March, 1969 (hereinafterreferred to as the prior Agreement) shall cease to beeffective from the date upon which this Convention haseffect in respect of the taxes to which the Conventionapplies in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.

    4. The prior Agreement shall terminate on the last dateon which it has effect in accordance with this Article.

    5. Notwithstanding the entry into force of thisConvention, an individual who is entitled to the benefitsof Article 15 of the prior Agreement at the time of theentry into force of the Convention shall continue to beentitled to such benefits until such time as the individualwould have ceased to be entitled to such benefits if theprior Agreement had remained in force.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    42/51

    42

    Article 32TERMINATION

    This Convention shall remain in force until terminated by aContracting State. Either Contracting State may terminatethe Convention after the expiration of a period of fiveyears from the date of its entry into force, by giving tothe other Contracting State, through the diplomaticchannel, six months prior written notice of termination.In such event, the Convention shall cease to have effect:

    a) in the case of Japan:

    (i) with respect to taxes withheld at source,for amounts taxable on or after 1 January in

    the calendar year next following theexpiration of the six month period;

    (ii) with respect to taxes on income which arenot withheld at source, as regards incomefor any taxable year beginning on or after 1January in the calendar year next followingthe expiration of the six month period; and

    (iii) with respect to other taxes, as regardstaxes for any taxable year beginning on orafter 1 January in the calendar year next

    following the expiration of the six monthperiod; and

    b) in the case of Australia:

    (i) with respect to withholding tax on incomethat is derived by a resident of Japan, inrelation to income derived on or after 1January in the calendar year next followingthe expiration of the six month period; and

    (ii) with respect to other taxes, as regards anytaxable year beginning on or after 1 July inthe calendar year next following theexpiration of the six month period.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, being dulyauthorised thereto by their respective Governments, havesigned this Convention.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    43/51

    43

    DONE in duplicate at Tokyo this thirty-first day ofJanuary, 2008, in the Japanese and English languages, each

    text being equally authentic.

    For Japan: For Australia:

    Masahiko Koumura Stephen Smith

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    44/51

    44

    Protocol

    At the signing of the Convention between Japan andAustralia for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and thePrevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes onIncome (hereinafter referred to as the Convention), Japanand Australia have agreed upon the following provisions,which shall form an integral part of the Convention.

    1. With reference to subparagraph b) of paragraph 1 ofArticle 2 (Taxes Covered) of the Convention:

    The term the petroleum resource rent tax means the

    resource rent tax, in respect of offshore projects relatingto the exploration for or exploitation of petroleumresources, imposed under the Petroleum Resource Rent TaxAct 1987.

    2. With reference to subparagraph d) of paragraph 1 ofArticle 3 (General Definitions) of the Convention:

    The term Japanese tax or Australian tax shall notinclude any amount which represents a penalty or interestimposed under the laws of Japan or Australia, respectively,relating to the taxes to which the Convention applies.

    3. With reference to paragraph 2 of Article 4 (Resident)of the Convention:

    It is understood that the fact of having an habitualabode in a Contracting State rather than in the otherContracting State shall be taken into account indetermining where the individuals centre of vitalinterests is situated.

    4. With reference to paragraph 3 of Article 4 (Resident)of the Convention:

    It is understood that the term any other relevantfactors includes:

    a) where the senior day-to-day management is carriedon;

    b) which Contracting States law governs the legalstatus;

    c) where the accounting records are held; and

    d) where business is carried on.

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    45/51

    45

    5. With reference to subparagraphs b) and c) of paragraph4 of Article 5 (Permanent Establishment) of the Convention:

    a) It is understood that an enterprise of aContracting State shall not be considered tooperate equipment in the other Contracting Statewhere the enterprise leases equipment under alease contract that is solely for the provisionof equipment, including a bareboat leasecontract.

    b) It is understood that the factors of size,quantity or value of equipment or the role ofequipment in income producing activities arerelevant in determining whether the equipment is

    substantial on the basis of the facts andcircumstances of each particular case.

    c) It is understood that the term substantialequipment may include:

    (i) industrial earthmoving equipment orconstruction equipment used in roadbuilding, dam building or powerhouseconstruction;

    (ii) manufacturing or processing equipment used

    in a factory; and

    (iii) oil or drilling rigs, platforms and otherstructures used in the petroleum or miningindustry.

    6. With reference to paragraph 7 of Article 5 (PermanentEstablishment) of the Convention:

    It is understood that the term substantiallynegotiate is included in order to remove any doubt as tothe existence of a permanent establishment where contractsthat have been negotiated by an agent in a ContractingState are formally concluded in the other ContractingState.

    7. With reference to Articles 6 (Income from RealProperty), 7 (Business Profits), 21 (Other Income) and 22(Source of Income) of the Convention:

  • 8/3/2019 DTC agreement between Australia and Japan

    46/51

    46

    It is understood that nothing in these Articles shallprevent a Contracting State from applying its domestic tax

    law in the case where income is derived by a resident ofthat Contracting State from real property situated in thatContracting State, even where such a resident carries onbusiness in the other Contracting State through a permanentestablishment situated therein and the real property iseffectively connected with such permanent establishment.In this case, such income shall not be deemed to arise fromsources in that other Contracting State for the purposes ofapplying the domestic tax law of the first-mentionedContracting State.

    8. With reference to subparagraph f) of paragraph 2 ofArticle 6 (Income from Real Property) of the Convention:

    It is understood that the rights referred to in thatsubparagraph principally cover:

    a) rights to receive payments where the personreceiving the payments grants rights to explorefor or exploit natural resources; and

    b) rights to receive payments which arise or arequantified by reference to the exploitation of,or exploration for, natural resources incircumstances where the person receiving the

    payments may not have an interest in the naturalresources or rights over the extraction of, orexploration for, natural resources.

    9. With reference to Articles 7 (Business Profits) and 13(Alienation of Property) of the Convention:

    It is understood that, where an enterprise of aContracting State which has carried on business in theother Contracting State through a permanent establishmentsituated therein, receives, after the enterprise has ceasedto carry on business as aforesaid, income, profits or gainsattributable to the permanent establishment, such income,profits or gains may be taxed in that other ContractingState in accordance with the principles stated in Articles7 and 13 of the Convention.

    10. With reference to paragraph 6 of Article 7 (BusinessProfits) of the Convention:

    It is understood that, for the purposes of theparagraph, a good and sufficient reason to the contraryshall be considered to exist where there is an alternativemethod that gives the most appropriate det