duchesne oilfield dumping incident epaosc/duchesneoilfielddumping
DESCRIPTION
Duchesne Oilfield Dumping Incident www.epaosc.org/duchesneoilfielddumping. Duchesne, UT September 24 – October 6, 2010 NRC Report 955263 FPN E10814. Key Response Issues. Notification procedures and use of the NRC Knowledge and use of the Green River sACP - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Duchesne Oilfield Dumping Incident
www.epaosc.org/duchesneoilfielddumping
Duchesne, UTSeptember 24 – October 6, 2010
NRC Report 955263FPN E10814
2
Key Response Issues
Notification procedures and use of the NRC
Knowledge and use of the Green River sACP
Changing Oil Spill Response Organization (OSRO) tactics and priorities to fit response
Pollution Reimbursement Funding Authorization (PRFA) to “save” Duchesne County complicated
Balancing needs of the response with the “rights” of water users downstream
Protecting T&E species and maintaining flows
3
Strawberry River
135 CFS
Starvation
Reservoir
Duchesne River
25 CFS
To Upper Stillwater Reservoir(35 Miles)
To GreenRiver
(44 Miles)
Impacted A
reas:
Strawberry
~ 1 mile
Duchesne ~ 3 mile
s
4
Spill Discovery
Discovered by local resident on recreation path Nearby water filling station for oil production Duchesne County (DC) FD and Emergency
Management notified on 9/24/2010 at 1:30 PM DC Emergency Manager (EM) notified UDEQ and
was given a list of OSROs to contact for support DC EM ordered OSRO to mobilize and respond
under verbal contract UDEQ, TriCounty Health Department, & Ute Tribe
representatives on-scene to size-up incident DC Sheriff finds evidence of “midnight dumping” of
“up to 80bbls of produced water and oil” at ramp
5
6
Initial Response & OSRO Escalation
Friday, 9/24/10 – Flow Reduction, Booming– 5 OSRO Personnel, Vacuum Truck, 250’ Boom– $7,500 Response Costs
Saturday, 9/25/10 – Access Points, Booming– 12 OSRO Personnel, 2 Vacuum Trucks, 2 Roll-Offs, 2,000’ Boom– $24,000 Response Costs / $31,500 Cumulative Costs
Sunday, 9/26/10 – Booming & Vacuuming– 13/16 OSRO/Sub Personnel, 2 Vac Trucks, Frac Tank, Excavator, Skid
Steer, 2 Roll-Offs, 2,000’ Boom – $32,500 Response Costs / $64,000 Cumulative Costs
Monday, 9/27/10 – Vacuuming & Gross Oil Recovery– 13/32 OSRO/Sub Personnel, 2 Vac Trucks, 2 Frac Tanks, Excavator,
Skid Steer, 2 ATVs, 2 Roll-Offs, 2,000’ Boom– $46,000 Response Costs / $110,000 Cumulative Costs
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
24-Sep 25-Sep 26-Sep 27-Sep
Date
OS
RO
Pe
rso
nn
el
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
Co
st
OSRO Personnel
Daily Cost
Total Cost
As of 5:00 PM on 9/27/2010:
- No estimate of recovered oil
- 2,000 gal of “oily water” recovered
- 15 bags of crude/oiled substrate recovered
-Estimated 4-6 weeks to complete removalto Red Butte Creek Oil Spill standards
7
8
Notification to EPA
UDEQ eMail to EPA Region 8 RRC – Saturday, 9/25/2010 @ 9:26 AM– “Debris, including petroleum products,” – “dumped [from truck] into [Strawberry River],”– “staying in clumps and not [mobile],”– “although booms placed to contain the spill.”
TCHD call to National Response Center– Monday, 9/27/2010 @ 2:30 PM– “~20 bbls of crude oil dumped into Strawberry River”– “impacting 4 mi of Strawberry and Duchesne Rivers”– “OSRO on-scene, but EPA help/resources needed.”– EPA OSC Dispatched to Incident @ 3:05 PM
9
EPA Initial Response Actions
Initial assessment of impacted river segments confirmed impacted areas and oil properties
Convened UC meeting and worked to prioritize/right-size OSRO oil recovery efforts
Consulted with DOI regarding T&E implications of reduced flows in Duchesne River
Met with BIA and Ute Tribe about their concerns Considered mobilizing ERRS contractor to
subcontract with OSROs Instead initiated discussions with the NPFC about
issuing a PRFA with DC to fund response Stopped short of “ratification” for initial costs
10
Removal Effort
Involved primarily physical/mechanical collection of clumps of oil and oiled substrate by crews
Focused on working from impacted Duchesne River toward spill site to expedite restoring flows
Extensive SCAT effort along impacted areas by UDEQ, DC, TCHD, EPA and Ute Tribe
Worked closely with Central Utah Water Conservancy District to “flush” rivers
Recovered ~10-12 bbls of crude oil during 10 days of response, which cost almost $500k
DC still negotiating contract/invoice with OSRO
11
12
30 CFS
300 CFS
13
Lessons Learned & Recommendations
Utilize NRC as “one call” phone number for Oil and HazMat spills; legally enforce compliance
Cleaning up spills is our business; developing novel contracting mechanisms isn’t
Discourage independent initiative and educate EMs about the inherent liability in spill response that is inconsistent with the NCP
Conduct outreach in oil production areas, emphasizing costs/benefits of compliance
Reinvigorate sACP updating and exercises in all nine Region 8 sACPs, beginning with Green River, Colorado River, and Missouri River
14
Google Earth File
15
16
“Thank you for your support!”
Questions?Criticism?Outreach Ideas?General Harassment?
Contact me…Steven Merritt On-Scene [email protected]