due process and restrictions of the person edward p. richards director, program in law, science, and...

44
Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU Law Center http://biotech.law.lsu.edu

Upload: easter-russell

Post on 26-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Due Process and Restrictions of the Person

Edward P. RichardsDirector, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health

Harvey A. Peltier Professor of LawLSU Law Center

http://biotech.law.lsu.edu

Page 2: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Pauline Varholy v. Rex Sweat, 15 So. 2d 267, 153 Fla. 571 (Fl 1943)

What was plaintiff arrested for? What do you think the sheriff suspected was her

profession? What disease is plaintiff suspected of having? How do they know?

Page 3: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

A Brief Introduction to VD Law

Venereal disease - disease of love (Venus) Discarded as sexist in favor of sexually

transmitted diseases (STDs) Disease is such a judgmental word, that it next

changed to sexually transmitted infections (STIs)

Page 4: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

The Traditional STIs

Syphilis The original and most dangerous, until HIV

Gonorrhea The new favorite 2-3+ million cases a year

Chlamydia Traditionally hard to diagnose so underreported Maybe as common as gonorrhea

Page 5: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Treatment

Prior to antibiotics, treatments were dangerous and not 100% effective Penicillin was the big change Widely used post-WWII

Lowest rate of syphilis in the late 1940s Easier to control because it is harder to catch

Gonorrhea and Chlamydia are easy to catch and everywhere, so you get reinfected

Page 6: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

VD and National Security

When was Varholy decided? What was going on at the time? How was she involved in this? Why is VD a national security issue? The first national VD laws were passed during

WWI

Page 7: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

The Confinement

Where is she being held? Where are they going to transfer her? What were her defenses to the criminal charges? What legal process did she use to get before the

court?

Page 8: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Habeas Corpus

What is the literal translation of habeas corpus? Bring the body

Where did this writ originate? English, first document in 1220 AD Became important during the abuses of

Charles I (1627-1640)

Page 9: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Suspending Habeas Corpus

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2 The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus

shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

LA Constitution "habeas corpus will not be suspended"

Page 10: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

When Was Habeas Corpus Suspended in a Free State?

Ex parte Milligan Milligan had been an Indiana resident for some

20 years prior the outbreak of the Civil War. In late 1864 he was arrested for various alleged acts of rebellion and aiding the Confederacy, being tried, convicted, and sentenced to death by a military tribunal in May, 1865.

He filed a writ of habeas corpus.

Page 11: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

The Milligan Ruling

The military had no right to hold or try Milligan unless and except “in foreign invasion or civil war, the courts are actually closed, and it is impossible to administer criminal justice according to law, then, on the theatre [sic] of active military operations, where war really prevails,” martial law shall prevail.

Does this include New Orleans?

Page 12: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

What Does Habeas Corpus Require?

Bring the person to a judge Why do you want the judge to actually see

them? When might you want to use video?

Show the legal authority for the confinement Show the facts supporting the legal authority

Like a prima facie case

Page 13: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Application to Varholy

What was the legal authority? Is this a civil or criminal law? What are the facts that support the confinement? Where does agency expertise come in? What will end her confinement?

Page 14: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

What about Bail?

What is the purpose of bail? What assumption underlies bail? Are there criminal cases in which bail is denied? Why did the court refuse to grant bail in this

case?

Page 15: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

What Process is Due?

Was there a hearing before plaintiff was quarantined?

What due process attended the habeas corpus hearing?

How is right to counsel different for habeas corpus based on a criminal charge or an administrative detention?

What process did she get in total?

Page 16: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

In re Halko, 246 Cal. App. 2d 553, 54 Cal. Rptr. 661 (Cal.App.Dist.2 1966)

Roughly how long as plaintiff been confined? What disease does he have? What is the basis for his claim that he has been

imprisoned without due process of law?

Page 17: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Tuberculosis - the White Plague

Killed 100,000 people a year in the US as late as 1940

Still kills more people world wide than any other communicable disease

Spread through coughing, infected bodily fluids, and though milk from infected cows

Controlled with isolation and treatment

Page 18: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Tuberculosis Infection

Dormant infection - converters You can be infected and the bug lies dormant for years The only evidence is a positive (converted) TB skin

test Active Infection

Trigger by stress, immune system problems HIV is #1 in the US Only infectious if it affects the respiratory track

Page 19: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Treatment

Converters Up to a year of preventive treatment Can have liver complications No drinking - great for the alcoholics

Active disease Months of treatment with multiple powerful drugs Some still die Cannot miss doses or the bug becomes resistant MDR means you may not be able to be treated and will

die

Page 20: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Why Lock Up Persons with Active TB?

Do you want one in class with you? How long can we justify locking them up?

Until cured? Only as long as they infectious?

What is an alternative to locking them up? DOT - directly observed treatment What if the carrier is a criminal or a bum?

Page 21: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Halko

How do you prove a case of TB? How is this different from proving a crime? How does this resemble Mathews?

What standard did the court use to review the quarantine order? reasonable grounds

Are persons who are quarantined entitled appointed counsel?

Page 22: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Reynolds v. McNichols

How does the case say the plaintiff described her employment?

Why did the state pass this law? Had plaintiff been seen and treated by the health

department before? What triggered the "hold and treat" statute? What was the "walk-in" order?

Page 23: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Policing Vice

How is that the police know if someone might be infected with an STI?

What is the role of prostitution in the tourist and convention business?

Do tourist/convention town really want to eliminate prostitution?

Why do they make prostitution illegal?

Page 24: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Plaintiff's Claims

http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/STDs/reynolds_v_mcnichols.htm#claims

Court's answer

Page 25: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Addington v. Texas, 441 U. S. 418 (1979)

What is the history of plaintiff's behavioral problems?

Were any of these crimes? Has he been treated for these problems in the

past? What problems did he pose in treatment? What is the state seeking to do in this case?

Page 26: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

What must the Fact-finder Determine?

(1) whether the proposed patient is mentally ill, and if so

(2) whether he requires hospitalization in a mental hospital for his own welfare and protection or the protection of others, and if so

(3) whether he is mentally incompetent.

Page 27: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

What Type of Detention?

How is a mental health commitment different from a criminal incarnation? What is the purpose? What is the duration? What about the facility?

What about sex offenders – where do we keep them?

Page 28: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Analyzing the Factors

What if he is not mentally ill but is a danger to others?

What if he is not mentally ill but is a danger to himself?

What if he is mentally ill, a danger to self/others, but competent?

Page 29: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Due Process

What started this proceeding? What can you do in LA? What type of fact-finder? Was he represented by counsel?

Page 30: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Standard of Proof

What standard did plaintiff say was constitutionally required?

What standard do we usually see in civil proceedings?

What standard did the Texas trial court use? What standard did the Texas Supreme Court said

would have been OK?

Page 31: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

United States Supreme Court

While the court does not mention Mathews, how does the discussion of standards of proof track the Mathews analysis?

What other cases have used the clear and convincing standard? Why?

How important is the distinction?

Page 32: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

What is the Source of Legal Authority?

Which mental health commitments are done under the police power?

Which are done under parens patria? Which power justifies more restrictions? How does this play out in mental health?

Page 33: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Clear and Convincing

What were the courts reasons for using this standard?

What about the argument that it really does not matter?

What is the stigma issue?

Page 34: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Least Restrictive Alternative

Used by many states in mental health Rejects the Mathews analysis and requires the

state to provide the least restrictive alternative for confinement, without regard to state resources.

Examples Supervised community placement No medication without the patient’s consent

What has been the response of the states?

Page 35: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

City of Newark v. J.S., 652 A.2d 265 (N.J.Super.Law Div. 1993)

What diseases does plaintiff have? Which is at issue in this case? What does the city want to do? What federal law does the judge think applies?

Page 36: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Due Process

What Due Process does the NJ Law Provide? What state does the judge look to? What does that state provide? How old is that law? Why do you think it was changed to give lots of

due process? What was the impact on the state’s TB rate?

Page 37: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

The Judge’s Approach

What NJ law does the judge look to? What are the parallels between the conditions? What are the differences that should matter for

due process purposes?

Page 38: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Sheldon v. Tucker, 364 US 479 (1960)

The judge implies that this case support LRA for disease control cases

The case is about making teachers give the state a list of all the organizations they have belonged to for the past 5 years

What constitutional provisions does this trigger? How is this different from disease control?

Page 39: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Covington v. Harris, 419 F.2d 617 (1969)

Plaintiff is asking to be transferred from a maximum security psychiatric ward to a general ward

The court finds that the original order did not address the need for this additional security

The case was remanded to allow the hospital to demonstrate why plaintiff posed the additional risk

Does this support the judge's argument?

Page 40: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Is the Judge Being Honest?

Do these cases really apply to disease control cases?

Why or why not?

Page 41: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

Green v. Edwards, 263 SE 2nd 661 (1980)

This case deals with the W.V. statute, which was modeled on the W.V. civil commitment statute

The court found that counsel has been appointed too late in the proceeding, based on decisions construing the civil commitment law

In this case, the legislature did seem to intend to treat the diseases in a similar manner

No US Constitutional issues

Page 42: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

The ADA

The ADA does not apply, and subsequent cases make it clear that threat to others (Arline) is also part of the ADA exclusions

This is beyond the scope of this course

Page 43: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

The Judge’s Ruling

What Standards did the Judge Apply? What scholarship influenced his decision? Did he disagree with the agency? Why should we care about standards in this

case? How might it play out in LA under these

standards? What might it cause agencies to do?

Page 44: Due Process and Restrictions of the Person Edward P. Richards Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Harvey A. Peltier Professor of Law LSU

SARS, Smallpox, and the End of Life as We Know It

SARS quarantine Possible smallpox quarantine and isolation issues How would the standard in JS work? Would an administrative determination with

habeas corpus review to the courts be constitutional?

What are the risks of a LRA standard if you cannot meet it?