duplicate supression case study

7
DUPLICATE SUPPRESSION CASE STUDY What Does NAP consistency do at scale? 1 Twitter: @danleibson Email: [email protected]

Upload: daniel-leibson

Post on 25-Jan-2017

1.713 views

Category:

Marketing


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Duplicate Supression Case Study

1

DUPLICATE SUPPRESSION CASE STUDY

What Does NAP consistency do at scale?

Twitter: @danleibson Email: [email protected]

Page 2: Duplicate Supression Case Study

2

THE DATA SET1,239 locations

48 Keywords per location

59,329 data points checked on a weekly basis

8,115 true duplicate or incorrect listings suppressed across 37 publishers

Twitter: @danleibson Email: [email protected]

Page 3: Duplicate Supression Case Study

3

THE METHODOLOGYAll keywords were geo-located by zip as there are multiple locations per city.DonutsLocation set to 92627

Explicit geo-location was called out both before and after the term.Donuts Costa MesaCosta Mesa Donuts

This is the first large scale study to demonstrate a direct correlation between citation consistency and Google My Business ranking.

Twitter: @danleibson Email: [email protected]

Page 4: Duplicate Supression Case Study

4

STUFF HAPPENED

Twitter: @danleibson Email: [email protected]

12/21/14 12/28/14 1/4/15 1/11/15 1/18/15 1/25/15 2/1/15 2/8/15 2/15/15 2/22/15 3/1/15 3/8/15 3/15/150

2000400060008000

1000012000

Local / 3 Pack Progress by Pack Type and Position Counts

3 Pack #1 Local Pack A 3 Pack #2 Local Pack B 3 Pack #3Local Pack C Local Pack D Local Pack E Local Pack F

Page 5: Duplicate Supression Case Study

5

LOTS OF AMAZING STUFF

Twitter: @danleibson Email: [email protected]

12/21/14 12/28/14 1/4/15 1/11/15 1/18/15 1/25/15 2/1/15 2/8/15 2/15/15 2/22/15 3/1/15 3/8/15 3/15/150

2000400060008000

1000012000

Local / 3 Pack Progress by Pack Type and Position Counts

3 Pack #1 Local Pack A 3 Pack #2 Local Pack B 3 Pack #3Local Pack C Local Pack D Local Pack E Local Pack F

3 Pack #1 Local Pack A

3 Pack #2 Local Pack B

3 Pack #3 Local Pack C

Local Pack D

Local Pack E

Local Pack F

Total-100%

-50%0%

50%100%150%200%

-1000-5000500100015002000

Overall Gain by Pack Type and Position Counts

Gain % Gain

Page 6: Duplicate Supression Case Study

6

AND EVEN THINGS WE DIDN’T EXPECT

Twitter: @danleibson Email: [email protected]

Positive 6 Positive 5 Positive 4 Positive 3 Positive 2 Positive 1 Zero Change

Negative 1

Negative 2

Negative 3

Negative 4

Negative 5

Negative 6

0500

1000150020002500300035004000

Rank Changes within Local or 3 Pack

Series1

Page 7: Duplicate Supression Case Study

7

TAKEAWAYS

Twitter: @danleibson Email: [email protected]

Enforcing citation consistency and removing duplicates produced a net 23% increase in pack presence.

This brand has an anemic SEO strategyNo indexable page per locationNo Google My Business optimizationDon’t measure GMB traffic