e. bubelis, m. schikorr (kit)

KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg andNational Research Center of the Helmholtz Association

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology

www.kit.edu

LEADER, WP5: Task 5.5 – Analyses of representative DEC events of the ETDR (ALFRED).

Pre-final results & conclusions by KIT (SIM-LFR)

E. Bubelis, M. Schikorr (KIT)

E. Bubelis and M. Schikorr – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR)

2 2013.02.26.

DEC transients analyzed for ALFRED using SIM-LFR code

TR-4 : UTOP, 250 pcm in 10 sec, no reactor trip

TO-3 : PLOF+FW temp drop (335 oC → 300 oC), reactor trip

TO-6 : PLOF+FW flow increase by 20%, reactor trip, DHR-1

T-DEC1 : ULOF, SCS in operation, no reactor trip

T-DEC3 : ULOHS, PPs operating, no reactor trip, DHR-1

T-DEC4 : ULOHS+ULOF, no reactor trip, DHR-1

T-DEC5 : SA blockage, determine max acceptable SA flow reduction

factor, no reactor trip

T-DEC6 : SCS failure, PPs operating, DHR-1 & DHR-2 fails, reactor trip


3 2013.02.26.

TR-4 : UTOP, 250 pcm in 10 sec, no reactor trip

For reactivity insertion of 250 pcm in 10 sec at BOC, as well as EOC core conditions, ALFRED reactor peak fuel pin cladding is not expected to fail (rupture), but local fuel melting is observed in the center of the peak fuel pins (pellets).

0.9

1.1

1.3

1.5

1.7

1.9

2.1

2.3

0 50 100 150 200Time [sec]

rel.

un

its [

fr]

Power_th

Flow_Cool

200

700

1200

1700

2200

2700

3200

0 50 100 150 200Time [sec]

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C

]

Fuelc_peak Clad_peakCool_out Cool_inT_wall

1E+00

1E+02

1E+04

1E+06

1E+08

1E+10

1E+12

1E+14

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200Time [sec]

Clad F

ailure

Time

[sec]

19.5

20.0

20.5

21.0

21.5

22.0

Fissio

n Gas

Pres

sure

[bar]

Clad Failure Time [sec]

Fission Gas Pressure [bar]30 min


4 2013.02.26.

TO-3 : PLOF+FW temp drop (335 °C → 300 °C), reactor trip

Protected LOF with FW temperature decrease to 300 oC will lead to a safety issue as Pb-freezing will have to be expected ~3.8 hours into the transient. During this time period operator has sufficient time to deactivate sub-systems of DHR-1 system, in order to prevent lead freezing at the outlet of the MHX.

0.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.180.20

0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800Time [sec]

rel.

un

its [

fr] Power_th

Flow_Cool

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800Time [sec]

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C

]


270

320

370

420

470

520

570

0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800Time[sec]

MH

X te

mp

era

ture

s [°

C]

Inlet prim Outlet sec

Outlet prim Inlet sec


5 2013.02.26.

TO-6 : PLOF+FW flow increase by 20%, reactor trip, DHR-1

Protected LOF with FW flowrate increase by 20 % presents no issue as related to Pb-freezing in the short term.However, in the long term, lead temperature at the outlet from the MHX will continue to decrease further, eventually approaching lead freezing temperature (~327oC) several hours into the transient.

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0 100 200 300 400Time [sec]

rel.

un

its [

fr] Power_th

Flow_Cool

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

0 100 200 300 400Time [sec]

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C

]


300

350

400

450

500

550

0 100 200 300 400Time[sec]

MH

X te

mp

era

ture

s [°

C]




6 2013.02.26.

T-DEC1 : ULOF, SCS in operation, no reactor trip

Under BOC and EOC conditions, the ULOF transient in the ALFRED reactor can be accommodated, implying minimum clad failure time of ~1.6E+5 sec under the minimum coolant flow conditions (flow undershoot conditions).This transient is not a critical transient for the ALFRED plant.

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0 100 200 300Time [sec]

rel.

un

its [

fr]

Power_th

Flow_Cool

200

700

1200

1700

2200

0 100 200 300Time [sec]

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C

]


1E+00

1E+02

1E+04

1E+06

1E+08

1E+10

1E+12

1E+14

0 50 100 150 200 250 300Time [sec]

Clad F

ailure

Time

[sec]

19.2

19.4

19.6

19.8

20.0

20.2

20.4

Fissio

n Gas

Pres

sure

[bar]

Clad Failure Time [sec]

Fission Gas Pressure [bar]

30 min

Min. Pin Clad Failure Time = 1.6E+5 sec at transient time t = 17.8 sec


7 2013.02.26.

T-DEC3 : ULOHS, PPs operating, no reactor trip, DHR-1

The main concern is the average vessel wall temperature which in ~ 1 hour transient time approaches ~670 °C, thus questioning the long term structural integrity of the vessel under these elevated temperature conditions.

Sufficient grace time (>> 30 min) is available for the manual operator intervention to terminate this transient by manually shutting down the reactor and cooling down the primary cooling circuit.

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500Time [sec]

rel.

un

its [

fr]

Power_th

Flow_Cool

200

700

1200

1700

2200

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500Time [sec]

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C

] Fuelc_peak Clad_peakCool_out Cool_inT_wall


8 2013.02.26.

T-DEC4 : ULOHS+ULOF, no reactor trip, DHR-1

The ULOOP (ULOF+ULOHS) transient revealed no additional relevant safety issues for ALFRED reactor as observed during the ULOHS.

A large influence in coping with this DEC transient is associated with the negative fuel, diagrid, pads, lead and CRs drivelines expansion reactivity feedback effects, effectively reducing reactor power to a safe power level (~ 3-4 % of the nominal power) in a timely manner.

Sufficient grace time (>> 30 min) is available for the manual operator intervention to terminate this transient by manually shutting down the reactor and cooling down the primary cooling circuit.

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500Time [sec]

rel.

un

its [

fr]

Power_th

Flow_Cool

200

700

1200

1700

2200

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500Time [sec]

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C



9 2013.02.26.

T-DEC5 : SA blockage, determine max acceptable SA flow reduction factor, no reactor trip

As a result of the SA blockage, the flow rate will initially decrease to ~ 12 % nominal, gradually recovering to about 20% flow rate at ~50 sec into the transient due to changing SA pressure conditions.

The power remains at 100% nominal throughout the transient.

Peak pin will fail ~56 sec into the transient as the cladding temperature will reach 1000 °C, with a peak pin fission gas pressure of ~23 bar.

Extreme case: Flow area of hottest SA 97.5% blocked; w/o radial heat transfer; EOC

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 20 40 60 80 100 120Time [sec]

rel.

un

its [

fr]

Power_th

Flow_Cool

300

500

700

900

1100

1300

1500

1700

0 20 40 60 80 100 120Time [sec]

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C



10 2013.02.26.

T-DEC5 : SA blockage, determine max acceptable SA flow reduction factor, no reactor trip

For flow blockages of < 75%, no pin failures nor fuel melting is expected, even under unprotected conditions.

For flow blockages of > 75%, peak power pins clad failure has to be expected, but fuel melting is not expected even for a flow blockage of 97.5%.

Case: Flow area of hottest SA blocked 20 – 97.5 %; w/o radial heat transfer

Clad failure time

0200400600800

10001200140016001800

60 70 80 90 100

SA blockage, %

Cla

d fa

ilure

tim

e, s

ec

Max clad temperature

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

20 40 60 80 100

SA blockage, %

Ma

x co

ola

nt t

em

p.,

oC

Blockage Clad failure Max. cool. Max clad Max fueltime* SA outlet temp temp

temp. (peak pin) (peak pin)

% secoC oC oC

20 2.70E+10 545 574 208940 1.50E+08 612 641 213660 3.00E+04 745 772 219465 1661 801 827 221870 53 874 898 224575 0 974 996 228080 0 1084 1103 232290 0 1148 1165 234995 0 1148 1165 2350

97.5 0 1148 1165 2350* - max fission gas pressure ~25 bar


11 2013.02.26.

T-DEC6 : SCS failure, PPs operating, DHR-1 & DHR-2 fails, reactor trip

Protected SCS failure transient, even assuming the complete failure of the DHRS, presents no imminent safety issue to ALFRED in the first several hours, following the event. However, all primary cooling circuit temperatures, will start increasing slowly and will reach ~500 oC in ~3 hours. Operator has sufficient time for manual intervention in order to prevent overheating of the whole primary system.

0.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.180.20

0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 3600Time [sec]

Po

we

r re

l. u

nits

[fr

]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Flo

w r

el.

un

its [

fr]

Power_th

Flow_Cool

350

400

450

500

550

600

0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 3600Time [sec]

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C


320340360380400420440460480500

0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 3600Time[sec]

MH

X te

mp

era

ture

s [°

C]




12 2013.02.26.

Conclusions

General:

The analysis of DEC transients performed for the Pb-cooled ALFRED design demonstrated the forgiving nature of this plant design, ascribable to the combination of:

1. the inherently, large thermal inertia of the Pb-cooled primary system,

2. the detailed focus on the optimization of all safety relevant systems, in particular emphasizing appropriate designs of all relevant control and safety systems (as well as components), and

3. optimizing the neutronic core characteristics of the ALFRED “core system” thereby assuring various reactivity feedback effects (fuel, diagrid, pads, Pb-coolant and CRs drivelines expansion reactivity) that effectively depress the reactor power under all adverse DEC transient conditions,

4. as the ALFRED core is specifically designed to accommodate the ULOF transient.

e. bubelis, m. schikorr (kit)

Documents