e-collaboration with web 2.0

45
E-Collaboration E-Collaboration And, the role of Web 2.0 And, the role of Web 2.0 February 11, February 11, 2010 2010 [email protected] [email protected] www.peergroup.net www.peergroup.net OC CIO Peer Group OC CIO Peer Group Breakfast Breakfast

Upload: james-sutter

Post on 14-Jan-2015

417 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

E-CollaborationE-CollaborationAnd, the role of Web 2.0And, the role of Web 2.0

February 11, 2010February 11, 2010

[email protected]@cox.net

www.peergroup.netwww.peergroup.net

OC CIO Peer Group BreakfastOC CIO Peer Group Breakfast

Page 2: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Constant Business PressuresConstant Business Pressures

• Globalization• Innovation• Demographic Changes• Green• Cost

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 22

Page 3: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

• Reduced Product Development Times

• Shorter Quote-to-Cash Cycles– Quick Response to

Customer• Globalization

• Customization of Products & Services

• Six-Sigma Quality Levels

• CAD, CAE, FEA, Product Data Management (PDM), CIS

• Order Management Systems, ERP, SCM/Capacity Simulation, Sales Force Automation, VMI

• Internet, Wide Area Nets, EDI, E-Mail, Currency, Language Facilities, A/V Conferencing, Web 2.0

• Software Modules, Object-Oriented Development, Table-driven Configurators

• CAD, Simulation, Design Rule Checking, Order Management

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 33

Business Drivers - IT Enablers

Page 4: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 44

• Materials Management (MRP)

• Shop Floor Control• CAD - CAE• Analytic Computation• Word Processing

• Direct Customer Access• Product Configurators• Product Customization• Fast Response/JIT• EDI/E-Commerce• Supply Chain• Collaboration

1960 - 19731960 - 1973 1973 - 1980s1973 - 1980s 1990-2000s1990-2000s

Faster Ledgers----

Direct Savings

Faster Ledgers----

Direct Savings

Operating Efficiencies

----Indirect Savings

Operating Efficiencies

----Indirect Savings

Virtual Corporation----

Growth

Virtual Corporation----

Growth

• Accounting/Finance

• Payroll• Sales Statistics• Cost Distribution• Inventory Accounting

Applications Software Shift

Page 5: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 55

Page 6: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Competitive StrategyCustomerCustomer

IntimacyIntimacy

Product Product

InnovationInnovation

OperationalOperational

ExcellenceExcellence

Product

Process

People

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 66

Best people often move on to other jobs Best people often move on to other jobs despite the investment in training. Expertise is despite the investment in training. Expertise is lostlost..

Leading Companies point to the fact that revenue Leading Companies point to the fact that revenue growth results from products that were recently growth results from products that were recently introducedintroduced

Continuous Improvement

Page 7: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Objective:

Cycle Time =

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 77

Page 8: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Objective:

Cycle Time = Process Time

Page 9: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Assumptions

• Process• Applications & Tools• Infrastructure

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 99

Page 10: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Further AssumptionProcess (Requirements,business rules)

Applications (Software)

Infrastructure (Platforms)

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 1010

Page 11: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Realities

• Not Sequential• Inflexible Software• Time Consuming• Lack of Standards• Sometimes it’s hard to set a rule

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 1111

Page 12: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Process Model

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 1212

ERP

Eng..Order

FactoryOrder

PurchaseOrder

SalesOrder

Page 13: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Process Model

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 1313

ERP

Eng..Order

PLM

FactoryOrder

PurchaseOrder

SalesOrder

EngineeringEngineering

CollaborationCollaboration

ManufacturingManufacturing

EngineeringEngineering

CollaborationCollaboration

ManufacturingManufacturing

Page 14: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

21st Century Organization

• Withering Hierarchy

• Teams

• Empowerment*

• Network-Based

*sometimes it’s O.K. to break the rule

Page 15: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Workgroups

• Product Teams• Functional Teams• Task Forces• Cross Functional Teams• Inter-company Teams• Industry Teams

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 1515

Page 16: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Workgroup Support Products

• Lotus Notes• Exchange/Outlook/Project• Sharepoint• Collabra• GroupWise• Blogs, Wikis, Social Networks

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 1616

Page 17: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

New Software Generation Appearing

• Object-Based (Flexible)• Platform Independent• Standards compliant (TCP/IP, etc....)• Web 2.0

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 1717

Page 18: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Software learns a lesson from hardware evolution

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 1818

.

Abstraction and encapsulation enables reuse of complex software capabilities

OTI-94-G0025.a

Har

dw

are

Har

dw

are

So

ftw

are

So

ftw

are

PrimitiveFunctions

EncapsulatedObjects SubsystemsMulti-Objects

Object

attributes

methods

Multi-Object

Object

Subsystem

Multi-Object

Multi-Object

Object

Object

Multi-Object

Page 19: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Web 2.0 Capabilities

• Conversation: Blogs• Syndication: RSS• Consensus: Wikis• Sharing: Social bookmarking• Applications: Mashups

WWWWWW.peergroup.net.peergroup.net

Page 20: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

McKinsey & Co.

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 2020

Page 21: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Web 2.0

Facilitates……Facilitates……

–Connections–Relationships–Context–Helps Resolve Ambiguities

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 2121

Page 22: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

The Rule: Only place litter in bins with lids

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 2222

Page 23: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Perspective is context

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 2323

Page 24: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Process Model

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 2424

ERP

Eng..Order

PLM

FactoryOrder

PurchaseOrder

SalesOrder

EngineeringEngineering

CollaborationCollaboration

ManufacturingManufacturing

EngineeringEngineering

CollaborationCollaboration

ManufacturingManufacturing

VendorVendor

CollaborationCollaboration

ManufacturingManufacturing

VendorVendor

CollaborationCollaboration

ManufacturingManufacturing

Page 25: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Growing Adoption Of Web 2.0

Source: Forrester ResearchSource: Forrester Research

Page 26: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Web 2.0 at Work

Which of the following technologies are being offered to employees as corporate applications?

Percent of sample answering

Instant messaging 50%

Wikis 30%

Blogs 23%

RSS 18%

Social networking 10%

None of the above 31%

Source: CIO Web 2.0 Survey, 2008Source: CIO Web 2.0 Survey, 2008

Page 27: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 2727

Electronic Marketing• Information• Literature• Samples

Order Processing• Order entry• Pricing• Agreements• Returns

CustomerAccountManagement

CustomerAccountManagement

CustomerService

Management

CustomerService

Management

Baldrige Award • People Empowerment

• Field Force/Teams

Baldrige Award • People Empowerment

• Field Force/Teams

CustomersField Service Reps

Re-engineered The Business Process• $21 million annual savings• 95% improvement in on-time delivery• 60% reduction in sales office queries• 72% reduction in product returns• 78% reduction in cycle time (14:1)

Re-engineered The Business Process• $21 million annual savings• 95% improvement in on-time delivery• 60% reduction in sales office queries• 72% reduction in product returns• 78% reduction in cycle time (14:1)

“The Customer Connection”

Texas Instruments

Page 28: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

WWWWWW.peergroup.net.peergroup.net

Page 29: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

WWWWWW.peergroup.net.peergroup.net

Page 30: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Stormhoek Vineyards

• Consumer Blogs (everyone’s a wine expert)

• Participative pairing• Wine Clubs• Subscription to wine publications• Sales have tripled since 2005

WWWWWW.peergroup.net.peergroup.net

Baseline…June 14, 2007Baseline…June 14, 2007

Page 31: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Current Applications Blogs

Internal Communication Marketing/PR

Wikis Collaboration Knowledge Capture & Management

Community Sites Marketing - Customer Engagement

Social Networks Company Directory on Steroids

Benefits: Attracting and retaining smart young workers

Page 32: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Shift to Customer 2.0

• Large businesses spend more on employee collaboration tools than customer-facing Web 2.0

• That trend will reverse by next year

• By 2013, companies will spend nearly a billion dollars more on customer-facing Web 2.0 than on internal collaboration

• Is there a payoff for this $1B investment?

Source: Forrester ResearchSource: Forrester Research

Page 33: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

EveryThing is Measurable

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 3333

Page 34: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Key Elements

• Re-engineer process• Communications network• Workflow software• Data Base discipline

• Web 2.0 utilization

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 3434

Page 35: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

ReadingsReadingsReal Time; McKenna, , Regis

Blur; Davis, Stan; Meyer, Christopher

Competitive Strategy; Porter, Michael

Using Technology to Improve Workforce Collaboration; McKinsey Digital

Page 36: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 3636

Thank You for Your AttentionThank You for Your Attention

[email protected]@cox.net

www.peergroup.netwww.peergroup.net

Page 37: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 3737

Page 38: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 3838

“When all is said and done ..More is said than done.”

Lou Holtz, Former Coach Notre Dame Fighting Irish

Page 39: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

The Challenge of Change

“It must be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to plan, more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to manage, than the creation of a new System. For the initiator has the enmity of all who would profit by the preservation of the old institu- tions and merely lukewarm defenders in those who would gain by the new ones.”

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 3939

Page 40: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

“It must be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to plan, more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to manage, than the creation of a new System. For the initiator has the enmity of all who would profit by the preservation of the old institutions and merely lukewarm defenders in those who would gain by the new ones.”

Maciavelli 1513

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 4040

Page 41: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Networks for Networking

• Intranets• PLM• SCM Software• Exchange/Notes• Self Serve• Blogs• Wikis

• EDI• EFT• Industry Intranets– textiles

• Trade Exchanges• E-Commerce• Social Networks

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 4141

Page 42: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Resulting Issues

• Process - BPR–Limited Successes (Ford/Mazda)

• Applications –Best of Breed Vs. Integrated Set–Tailoring/custom development

• Infrastructure–Diversity

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 4242

Page 43: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

CaterpillarCaterpillar

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 4343

Benefits• Cycle times reduced from

60 days to 5-10 days• Fewer people in the process• Improved accuracy

Benefits• Cycle times reduced from

60 days to 5-10 days• Fewer people in the process• Improved accuracy

Dealers & OEMs

• Data entry screen at customer location• High level English language part names• Prompts for features, modules, and options

• Software and data base explode order into low level, complex details such as numbering, revision levels, and codes

• Validates for customer that order will fit current configuration

Business Need• Simplify the

ordering Process• Reduce cycle times

Business Need• Simplify the

ordering Process• Reduce cycle times

Page 44: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

Competitive Strategy

Customer

Intimacy

Product

Innovation

Operational

Excellence

Product ***** ********* **

Process ******** ** *********

People ********* ***** *****

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 4444

Page 45: E-Collaboration with Web 2.0

[email protected]@cox.net www.PeerGroup.netwww.PeerGroup.net 4545