e-defense large-scaled underground structure test ......02/23/2014 e-defense large-scaled...

135
02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants Team CTC Category (a) Category 1: Two vertical shafts with a cut-and-cover tunnel Classification (b) Practitioner (Engineer/Designer) Representative Hiroki Wauchi Affiliation ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation Team Members (Excluding representative) 1. Sunhae Yoon, ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation 2. Toshio Noguchi, ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation 3. Noriyuki Kubo, ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation 4. Shinkichi Sakai, ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation 5. Team Takenaka Category (c) Category 3: All Classification (a) Researcher Representative Kazuhiro Kaneda Affiliation Takenaka Corporation Team Members (Excluding representative) 1. Naohiro Nakamura, Takenaka Corporation 2. Yoshimasa Shigeno, Takenaka Corporation 3. Takuya Suzuki, Takenaka Corporation 4. Takuya Kinoshita, Takenaka Corporation 5. Takaki Tojo, Takenaka Corporation 6. Sadatomo Onimaru, Takenaka Corporation 7. Soshi Nakamura, Takenaka Corporation In addition, 4 more teams including research groups in Japan, USA and China, intended to join in the competition, but they canceled participating for some reasons.

Upload: others

Post on 05-Apr-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

02/23/2014

E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis

Final Evaluation

Participants

Team CTC

Category (a) Category 1: Two vertical shafts with a cut-and-cover tunnel

Classification (b) Practitioner (Engineer/Designer)

Representative Hiroki Wauchi

Affiliation ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation

Team Members

(Excluding representative)

1. Sunhae Yoon, ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation

2. Toshio Noguchi, ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation

3. Noriyuki Kubo, ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation

4. Shinkichi Sakai, ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation

5.

Team Takenaka

Category (c) Category 3: All

Classification (a) Researcher

Representative Kazuhiro Kaneda

Affiliation Takenaka Corporation

Team Members

(Excluding representative)

1. Naohiro Nakamura, Takenaka Corporation

2. Yoshimasa Shigeno, Takenaka Corporation

3. Takuya Suzuki, Takenaka Corporation

4. Takuya Kinoshita, Takenaka Corporation

5. Takaki Tojo, Takenaka Corporation

6. Sadatomo Onimaru, Takenaka Corporation

7. Soshi Nakamura, Takenaka Corporation

In addition, 4 more teams including research groups in Japan, USA and China, intended to join in the competition,

but they canceled participating for some reasons.

Page 2: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

- 2 -

Basic Information / Strategies of Evaluation

Both of Team CTC and Team Takenaka submitted their results for Class A analysis. So, there is no

advantage for Class A analysis on the teams.

Delta t of the time histories submitted from the teams is 0.01 second (100Hz).

Using summations of absolute simple differences and root mean squares (RMS), errors (differences

between test and numerical results) are expressed in single scalars.

Normalizing “the average errors” with “the maximum responses”, calculate rates of the errors and give

scores for each item based on the below tables: Table 1 is score list for the evaluation methods 1, 2a, 3 and

4a. Table 2 is for the evaluation methods 2b and 4b with RMS because the rates of the errors are

significantly small in these methods than in the others.

Advantages of this method are; 1) it can evaluate results in different category using scores given based on

the same rule, 2) it can give additional scores to teams in Category 3 making more efforts than the other

Categories.

Table 1 Score except for RMS evaluation Table 2 Score for RMS evaluation

Rate of Error (%) Score Rate of Error (%) Score

0 ~ 5 10 0 ~ 0.5 10

5 ~ 10 9 0.5 ~ 10 9

10 ~ 15 8 1.0 ~ 1.5 8

15 ~ 20 7 1.5 ~ 2.0 7

20 ~ 30 6 2.0 ~ 3.0 6

30 ~ 40 5 3.0 ~ 4.0 5

40 ~ 50 4 4.0 ~ 5.0 4

50 ~ 60 3 5.0 ~ 6.0 3

60 ~ 80 2 6.0 ~ 8.0 2

80 ~ 100 1 8.0 ~ 10.0 1

100 ~ 0 10.0 ~ 0

Page 3: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

- 3 -

Evaluation methods

Because each researcher or engineer may have different sense of value, the below methods are tried in order to

make objective competition as much as possible.

Method 1: Max / Min, Residual

This method compares the maximum, the minimum and the residual values of each response. It is one of the

simplest methods and maybe sufficient in design practice. In addition, there is no room for personal subjective

judgment, and therefore, it is completely fare. However, it cannot evaluate agreement of the specimen responses,

such as time histories of acceleration / displacement.

Method 2a: Time Histories with Simple Difference

This method can directly quantify agreements of the time histories. But the maximum absolute responses are used

as denominators in the calculation of the rates, so the rates show small values. This fault generates some extreme

cases: for instance, test result shows large displacement and very small displacement appears in analysis; an

average of test result = 1, maximum of the test result = 3, an average of numerical result = 0.001, 𝑟𝜀 = 33.3%. In

summary, test and analysis results do not agree at all, but the score is 5 based on Table 1. This fault can be covered

with Method 1, the maximum and the minimum values.

Method 2b: Time Histories with RMS

In this method, root mean squares (RMS) are used in order to express errors in single scalars, instead of the simple

differences. Evaluation results show the same tendency with ones in Method 2a.

Method 3: Arias Intensity

In this method, strengths of motions (Arias Intensity of acceleration time histories) are compared. This method

cannot evaluate displacement/strain time histories.

Method 4a: Fourier Spectrum with Simple difference

This method can see agreements any frequency components of motions, and it does not affect phase difference,

residual displacements and strains. In calculations of the error rates, the maximum spectra are also used as

denominators, the rates become small, and therefore, scores are relatively high even in cases with large

differences.

Method 4b: Fourier Spectrum with RMS

Instead of the simple differences, RMSs are used as indexes of the errors. The Same tendency appears with one of

Method 4a.

Summary:

All the evaluation methods seem to have some faults. To be objective as much as possible, evaluation results with

various methods need to be totally summarized (probably evaluations with various methods can complement

faults in each method).

Page 4: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

- 4 -

Evaluations (score sheets and comparisons of test and analysis are attached in Appendices)

Method 1: Max / Min, Residual

𝑟𝜀 = |𝑑𝑡 − 𝑑𝑎| |𝑑𝑡|max⁄ × 100

𝑟𝜀: Rate of Error (%), 𝑑𝑡: Data in Experiment, 𝑑𝑎: Data in analysis. Note: Displacement and strain time

histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data.

Table 2-1 Method 1, Case1 (Step Sine 50 Gal, X-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 39 84 30 9 --- --- --- --- 162

28 64 19 6 --- --- --- --- 117

Takenaka

Corp.

21 49 18 6 57 24 57 5 237

17 39 14 3 39 --- 39 --- 151

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 2-2 Method 1, Case2 (Step Sine 50 Gal, Y-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 43 108 30 11 --- --- --- --- 192

33 60 17 1 --- --- --- --- 111

Takenaka 21 40 22 16 70 5 71 5 250

16 30 17 12 40 --- 40 --- 155

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 2-3 Method 1, Case3 (JR Takatori 50%)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 68 126 33 5 --- --- --- --- 232

Takenaka 24 52 20 5 72 15 72 5 265

(a) Acceleration/Displacement at Ground Surface

(b) Acceleration/Displacement at Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid/Flexible Sides

(c) Acceleration at Center of Cut & Cover Tunnel

(d) Relative Displacement of Flexible Joint

(e) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(f) Bending Strain of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(g) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel with Flexible Segment

(h) Relative Displacement of Flexible Segment

Page 5: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

- 5 -

Method 2a: Time Histories with Simple Difference

𝑟𝜀 =∑|𝑑𝑡𝑖 − 𝑑𝑎𝑖|

𝑁𝑖

|𝑑𝑡|max⁄ × 100

𝑟𝜀: Rate of Error (%), 𝑑𝑡𝑖: Data in Experiment at ith

time step, 𝑑𝑎𝑖: Data in analysis at ith

time step, 𝑁: Number of

data. Note: Displacement and strain time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1

sec. data from all the data.

Table 3-1 Method 2a, Case1 (Step Sine 50 Gal, X-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 27 58 14 7 --- --- --- --- 106

14 28 8 5 --- --- --- --- 55

Takenaka 28 55 14 11 30 9 31 10 188

14 26 7 5 18 --- 18 --- 88

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 3-2 Method 2a, Case2 (Step Sine 50 Gal, Y-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 28 52 13 7 --- --- --- --- 100

15 27 7 3 --- --- --- --- 52

Takenaka 27 53 14 10 32 12 35 10 193

13 27 7 6 20 --- 20 --- 93

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 3-3 Method 2a, Case3 (JR Takatori 50%)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 32 62 20 5 --- --- --- --- 119

Takenaka 27 54 16 4 40 11 40 13 205

(a) Acceleration/Displacement at Ground Surface

(b) Acceleration/Displacement at Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid/Flexible Sides

(c) Acceleration at Center of Cut & Cover Tunnel

(d) Relative Displacement of Flexible Joint

(e) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(f) Bending Strain of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(g) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel with Flexible Segment

(h) Relative Displacement of Flexible Segment

Page 6: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

- 6 -

Method 2b: Time Histories with RMS

𝑟𝜀 = √∑(𝑑𝑡𝑖 − 𝑑𝑎𝑖)2

𝑖

𝑁 |𝑑𝑡|max⁄⁄ × 100

𝑟𝜀: Rate of Error (%), 𝑑𝑡𝑖: Data in Experiment at ith

time step, 𝑑𝑎𝑖: Data in analysis at ith

time step, 𝑁: Number of

data. Note: Displacement and strain time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1

sec. data from all the data.

Table 4-1 Method 2b, Case1 (Step Sine 50 Gal, X-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 38 77 19 14 --- --- --- --- 148

19 38 10 8 --- --- --- --- 75

Takenaka 37 74 18 18 38 17 39 18 259

18 36 9 9 20 --- 20 --- 112

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 4-2 Method 2b, Case2 (Step Sine 50 Gal, Y-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 38 74 18 15 --- --- --- --- 145

19 37 9 7 --- --- --- --- 72

Takenaka 38 73 19 17 38 18 40 18 261

19 37 9 9 20 --- 20 --- 114

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 4-3 Method 2b, Case3 (JR Takatori 50%)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 39 78 20 17 --- --- --- --- 154

Takenaka 36 74 19 14 40 17 40 18 258

(a) Acceleration/Displacement at Ground Surface

(b) Acceleration/Displacement at Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid/Flexible Sides

(c) Acceleration at Center of Cut & Cover Tunnel

(d) Relative Displacement of Flexible Joint

(e) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(f) Bending Strain of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(g) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel with Flexible Segment

(h) Relative Displacement of Flexible Segment

Page 7: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

- 7 -

Method 3: Arias Intensity

𝑟𝜀 = (𝐼𝐴𝑡 − 𝐼𝐴𝑎) 𝐼𝐴𝑡⁄ × 100, 𝐼𝐴 = 𝜋 2𝑔⁄ ∫ (𝑎)2𝑇

0𝑑𝑡

𝑟𝜀: Rate of Error (%), 𝐼𝐴𝑡: Arias Intensity calculated from test, 𝐼𝐴𝑎: Arias Intensity calculated from analysis, 𝐼𝐴:

Arias Intensity, 𝑔: gravity, 𝑇: Duration of acceleration, 𝑎: acceleration time history.

Table 5-1 Method 3, Case1 (Step Sine 50 Gal, X-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 16 24 18 --- --- --- --- --- 58

10 18 10 --- --- --- --- --- 38

Takenaka 8 14 10 --- 28 --- 28 --- 88

6 12 7 --- 20 --- 20 --- 65

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 5-2 Method 3, Case2 (Step Sine 50 Gal, Y-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 14 29 17 --- --- --- --- --- 60

8 18 9 --- --- --- --- --- 35

Takenaka 7 14 12 --- 31 --- 32 --- 96

5 11 7 --- 20 --- 20 --- 63

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 5-3 Method 3, Case3 (JR Takatori 50%)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 20 37 20 --- --- --- --- --- 77

Takenaka 18 28 17 --- 37 --- 37 --- 137

(a) Acceleration/Displacement at Ground Surface

(b) Acceleration/Displacement at Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid/Flexible Sides

(c) Acceleration at Center of Cut & Cover Tunnel

(d) Relative Displacement of Flexible Joint

(e) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(f) Bending Strain of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(g) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel with Flexible Segment

(h) Relative Displacement of Flexible Segment

Page 8: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

- 8 -

Method 4a: Fourier Spectrum with Simple difference

𝑟𝜀 =∑|𝑓𝑡𝑖 − 𝑓𝑎𝑖|

𝑁𝑖

|𝑓𝑡|max⁄ × 100

𝑟𝜀: Rate of Error (%), 𝑓𝑡𝑖: Fourier spectrum in Experiment at ith

frequency, 𝑓𝑎𝑖: Fourier spectrum in analysis at ith

frequency, 𝑁: Number of data. Note: |𝑓𝑡|max is the maximum Fourier spectrum in a range between 0.5 and 20 Hz

in order to eliminate gradual increase of residual displacement / strain.

Table 6-1 Method 4a, Case1 (Step Sine 50 Gal, X-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 31 67 17 14 --- --- --- --- 129

18 40 10 9 --- --- --- --- 77

Takenaka 28 58 16 15 37 13 35 12 214

16 33 9 8 20 --- 20 --- 106

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 6-2 Method 4a, Case2 (Step Sine 50 Gal, Y-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 31 66 17 15 --- --- --- --- 129

18 36 10 8 --- --- --- --- 72

Takenaka 27 56 16 15 37 15 37 14 217

15 31 9 8 20 --- 20 --- 103

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 6-3 Method 4a, Case3 (JR Takatori 50%)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 39 78 20 13 --- --- --- --- 150

Takenaka 37 75 20 12 40 17 40 18 259

(a) Acceleration/Displacement at Ground Surface

(b) Acceleration/Displacement at Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid/Flexible Sides

(c) Acceleration at Center of Cut & Cover Tunnel

(d) Relative Displacement of Flexible Joint

(e) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(f) Bending Strain of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(g) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel with Flexible Segment

(h) Relative Displacement of Flexible Segment

Page 9: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

- 9 -

Method 4b: Fourier Spectrum with RMS

𝑟𝜀 = √∑(𝑓𝑡𝑖 − 𝑓𝑎𝑖)2

𝑖

𝑁 |𝑓𝑡|max⁄⁄ × 100

𝑟𝜀: Rate of Error (%), 𝑓𝑡𝑖: Fourier spectrum in Experiment at ith

frequency, 𝑓𝑎𝑖: Fourier spectrum in analysis at ith

frequency, 𝑁: Number of data. Note: |𝑓𝑡|max is the maximum Fourier spectrum in a range between 0.5 and 20 Hz

in order to eliminate gradual increase of residual displacement / strain.

Table 7-1 Method 4b, Case1 (Step Sine 50 Gal, X-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 36 74 18 16 --- --- --- --- 144

19 40 10 9 --- --- --- --- 78

Takenaka 36 71 19 17 39 16 38 15 251

19 38 10 9 20 --- 20 --- 116

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 7-2 Method 4b, Case2 (Step Sine 50 Gal, Y-axis)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 35 72 18 15 --- --- --- --- 140

20 40 10 9 --- --- --- --- 79

Takenaka 34 66 19 13 40 14 39 16 241

18 36 10 7 20 --- 20 --- 111

Top: Total of all results,Bottom: Total of reliable results

Table 7-3 Method 4b, Case3 (JR Takatori 50%)

Team (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Total

CTC 39 76 20 11 --- --- --- --- 146

Takenaka 38 76 20 11 40 16 40 19 260

(a) Acceleration/Displacement at Ground Surface

(b) Acceleration/Displacement at Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid/Flexible Sides

(c) Acceleration at Center of Cut & Cover Tunnel

(d) Relative Displacement of Flexible Joint

(e) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(f) Bending Strain of Shield Tunnel without Flexible Segment

(g) Acceleration of Shield Tunnel with Flexible Segment

(h) Relative Displacement of Flexible Segment

Page 10: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

- 10 -

Total Evaluation Result

Most of the evaluation methods show the same tendency as follows;

The acceleration time histories in the results of both the teams show great agreements with the test results.

In the displacement time histories, Team CTC gives better numerical results. The results submitted from

Team Takenaka show very small displacements.

Comparing the experimental and numerical results in the items (a) through (d), behaviors of the vertical

shafts and the cut-and-cover tunnel, Team CTC provides the results with higher agreement than Team

Takenaka.

Adding the scores for the items (e) through (h), behaviors of the shield tunnels, Team Takenaka becomes a

higher score holder.

If a difference of scores between the teams is minor, the evaluation method needs to be selected more

seriously, but the difference is not minor. Therefore, it is clear that Team Takenaka is the 1st team even

though each evaluation method has some faults.

1st

Team Takenaka

2nd

Team CTC

Page 11: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Appendix A

Score Sheet

Page 12: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Score Sheet

Team CTC

Case1 Step Sine 50 Gal in X-axis

Page 13: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTC 1/2Case: 1

Test Analysis Test Analysis1.019 1.003

-0.902 -1.0110.253 0.144

-0.232 -0.1281.393 0.826

-1.902 -1.0590.686 0.060

-0.662 -0.0591.169 1.029

-1.056 -1.0470.643 0.157

-0.739 -0.1770.803 1.100

-1.460 -1.2050.190 0.055

-0.219 -0.1031.188 1.040

-1.077 -1.0430.866 0.173

-0.607 -0.1560.856 1.097

-1.410 -1.2620.457 0.123

-0.358 -0.0450.838 0.777

-0.778 -0.7800.115 0.090

-0.137 -0.0850.043 0.005

-0.016 -0.0090.025 0.010

-0.009 -0.039

: Less reliable results with Noise

-0.035

0.045

-0.110

0.076

-0.481

0.204

-0.032

0.004 -0.022

-0.002

0.095

-0.056

0.027

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data fromall the data.

Displacement @Flexible Joint

X

Y

---

---

---

---

---

---

-0.539

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X

Y

X

Y

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X

Y

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X

Y

---

---

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X

Y

-0.424

0.315

Direction

Acceleration @Ground surface

X

Y

Displacement @Ground surface

X

Y

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

a

b

c

d

Maximum/Minimum Redisual

Page 14: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 1

Difference (%) Score Difference (%) Score (1) (2)-1.66 1012.07 8

-43.21 4-44.78 4-40.72 4-44.32 4-91.25 1-91.13 1-11.99 8-0.78 10

-75.59 2-76.11 237.13 5

-17.46 7-71.31 2-52.82 3-12.44 8-3.16 10

-80.04 1-74.32 228.14 6

-10.48 8-72.99 2-87.41 1-7.29 90.22 10

-21.98 6-38.12 5-87.91 1-45.54 4-59.94 3345.75 0

: Less reliable results with Noise (1) Total of all results(2) Total of reliable results

Y

-88.37

Displacement @Flexible Joint

X

Y

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X

Y

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

X ---

Y ---

-53.52

-92.97

-641.11 0

1

3

1

---

2

1

Displacement @Ground surface

X

Y

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X ---

Y ---

1

-74.10 2

-85.58

-93.58

-64.81

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X

Y

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X ---

Maximum/Minimum Redisual

Acceleration @Ground surface

X ---

Y ---

Direction

2/2

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

162117

28

64

19

6

a

b

c

d 9

30

84

39

Subtotal

Page 15: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 1Evaluation: Method 2a, Time Histories with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 331.267 0.158 1.019 15.473 7Y 117.086 0.056 0.253 22.044 6X 609.905 0.290 1.902 15.271 7Y 216.527 0.103 0.686 15.038 7X 379.046 0.180 1.169 15.439 7Y 207.130 0.099 0.739 13.343 8X 479.690 0.228 1.460 15.650 7Y 122.455 0.058 0.219 26.628 6X 378.770 0.180 1.188 15.184 7Y 212.827 0.101 0.866 11.703 8X 464.131 0.221 1.410 15.679 7Y 141.023 0.067 0.457 14.710 8X 245.346 0.117 0.838 13.948 8Y 68.530 0.033 0.137 23.852 6X 32.140 0.015 0.043 35.417 5Y 41.519 0.020 0.025 79.355 2

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data.

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

5

Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response DifferenceRate (%) Score

Subtotal

106

Direction

55

a

b

c

d

(1) Total - All

27 14

58 28

14

(2) Total - Reliable Data Only

8

7

Page 16: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 1Evaluation: Method 2b, Time Histories with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 11.025 0.005 1.019 0.515 9Y 3.242 0.002 0.253 0.610 9X 17.381 0.008 1.902 0.435 10Y 6.591 0.003 0.686 0.458 10X 12.183 0.006 1.169 0.496 10Y 6.229 0.003 0.739 0.401 10X 15.133 0.007 1.460 0.494 10Y 3.410 0.002 0.219 0.741 9X 12.506 0.006 1.188 0.501 9Y 6.268 0.003 0.866 0.345 10X 14.833 0.007 1.410 0.501 9Y 4.072 0.002 0.457 0.425 10X 8.479 0.004 0.838 0.482 10Y 1.870 0.001 0.137 0.651 9X 0.931 0.000 0.043 1.026 8Y 1.080 0.001 0.025 2.065 6

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data.

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

38 19Displacement @Ground surface

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response DifferenceRate (%) Score

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

77 38

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

(1) Total - All 148(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 75

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 19 10

d Displacement @Flexible Joint 14 8

Page 17: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 1Evaluation: Method 3, Arias Intensity

(1) (2)X 0.323 0.310 3.936 10Y 0.043 0.034 21.335 6X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.350 0.325 7.042 9Y 0.094 0.040 56.984 3X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.354 0.325 8.016 9Y 0.095 0.040 58.266 3X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.294 0.280 4.767 10Y 0.021 0.023 11.596 8X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---

: Less reliable results with Noise(1) Total - All 58

(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 38

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 18 10

d Displacement @Flexible Joint --- ---

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

24 18

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

16 10Displacement @Ground surface

Direction AI Experiment AI Analysis DifferenceRate (%) Score

Page 18: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 1Evaluation: Method 4a, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 32.917 0.040 1.098 3.679 10Y 15.182 0.019 0.100 18.671 7X 112.611 0.138 1.097 12.600 8Y 57.811 0.071 0.305 23.239 6X 35.276 0.043 1.114 3.887 10Y 14.690 0.018 0.076 23.784 6X 43.228 0.053 1.386 3.827 10Y 16.272 0.020 0.102 19.510 7X 30.394 0.037 1.132 3.295 10Y 17.308 0.021 0.097 21.901 6X 41.123 0.050 1.385 3.642 10Y 26.173 0.032 0.278 11.560 8X 22.049 0.027 1.092 2.479 10Y 7.235 0.009 0.047 18.899 7X 2.531 0.003 0.032 9.682 9Y 2.705 0.003 0.011 30.787 5

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

Subtotal

c

d

67

17

14

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Score

a

b

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

(1) Total - All 129(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 77

31 18

40

10

9

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Total Difference Difference/data Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%)Direction

Page 19: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 1Evaluation: Method 4b, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 1.921 0.002 1.098 0.215 10Y 0.739 0.001 0.100 0.909 9X 6.151 0.008 1.097 0.688 9Y 2.846 0.003 0.305 1.144 8X 2.349 0.003 1.114 0.259 10Y 0.757 0.001 0.076 1.226 8X 3.624 0.004 1.386 0.321 10Y 0.781 0.001 0.102 0.937 9X 2.063 0.003 1.132 0.224 10Y 0.855 0.001 0.097 1.081 8X 3.470 0.004 1.385 0.307 10Y 1.558 0.002 0.278 0.688 9X 1.539 0.002 1.092 0.173 10Y 0.470 0.001 0.047 1.228 8X 0.219 0.000 0.032 0.838 9Y 0.157 0.000 0.011 1.788 7

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

36 19Displacement @Ground surface

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%) Score

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

74 40

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

(1) Total - All 144(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 78

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 18 10

d Displacement @Flexible Joint 16 9

Page 20: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Score Sheet

Team CTC

Case2 Step Sine 50 Gal in Y-axis

Page 21: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTC 1/2Case: 2

Test Analysis Test Analysis0.303 0.131

-0.231 -0.1331.132 1.036

-1.178 -1.0400.504 0.067

-1.252 -0.0781.268 1.099

-1.567 -1.3090.419 0.364

-0.362 -0.3711.290 1.266

-1.574 -1.2740.155 0.219

-0.867 -0.2131.308 1.494

-1.259 -1.6810.435 0.314

-0.390 -0.3091.495 1.260

-1.548 -1.2690.141 0.162

-0.698 -0.1661.474 1.412

-1.421 -1.8120.135 0.093

-0.109 -0.0970.858 0.968

-0.848 -0.8930.004 0.004

-0.235 0.0000.020 0.041

-0.070 -0.001

: Less reliable results with Noise

-0.017

-0.042

-0.027

0.099

-0.596

0.127

-0.290

-0.077 0.028

0.003

-0.121

-0.027

-0.017

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data fromall the data.

Displacement @Flexible Joint

X

Y

---

---

---

---

---

---

-0.729

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X

Y

X

Y

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X

Y

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X

Y

---

---

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X

Y

-0.750

-0.366

Direction

Acceleration @Ground surface

X

Y

Displacement @Ground surface

X

Y

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

a

b

c

d

Maximum/Minimum Redisual

Page 22: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 2

Difference (%) Score Difference (%) Score (1) (2)-56.89 3-42.39 4-8.47 9

-11.70 8-86.64 1-93.80 1-13.35 8-16.49 7-12.99 8

2.62 10-1.87 10

-19.05 741.21 4

-75.46 214.16 833.54 5

-27.94 6-20.63 6-15.76 7-18.03 714.74 8

-76.14 2-4.21 1027.52 6

-31.38 5-11.70 812.83 85.38 97.03 9

-99.91 1103.72 0-99.17 1

: Less reliable results with Noise (1) Total of all results(2) Total of reliable results

Y

-95.48

Displacement @Flexible Joint

X

Y

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X

Y

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

X ---

Y ---

-195.24

-100.89

-136.29 0

0

0

1

---

0

1

Displacement @Ground surface

X

Y

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X ---

Y ---

1

-96.46 1

-88.48

-97.68

-117.05

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X

Y

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X ---

Maximum/Minimum Redisual

Acceleration @Ground surface

X ---

Y ---

Direction

2/2

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

192111

33

60

17

1

a

b

c

d 11

30

108

43

Subtotal

Page 23: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 2Evaluation: Method 2a, Time Histories with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 103.167 0.049 0.303 16.227 7Y 466.761 0.222 1.178 18.866 7X 615.488 0.293 1.252 23.410 6Y 492.436 0.234 1.567 14.963 8X 175.855 0.084 0.419 20.002 6Y 508.444 0.242 1.574 15.380 7X 518.393 0.247 0.867 28.459 6Y 565.370 0.269 1.308 20.575 6X 148.838 0.071 0.435 16.280 7Y 523.158 0.249 1.548 16.097 7X 402.471 0.192 0.698 27.471 6Y 613.278 0.292 1.474 19.815 7X 58.686 0.028 0.135 20.645 6Y 329.198 0.157 0.858 18.265 7X 209.392 0.100 0.235 42.444 4Y 83.845 0.040 0.070 56.811 3

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data.

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

3

Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response DifferenceRate (%) Score

Subtotal

100

Direction

52

a

b

c

d

(1) Total - All

28 15

52 27

13

(2) Total - Reliable Data Only

7

7

Page 24: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 2Evaluation: Method 2b, Time Histories with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 2.898 0.001 0.303 0.456 10Y 15.980 0.008 1.178 0.646 9X 17.307 0.008 1.252 0.658 9Y 15.300 0.007 1.567 0.465 10X 5.046 0.002 0.419 0.574 9Y 16.377 0.008 1.574 0.495 10X 15.202 0.007 0.867 0.835 9Y 17.379 0.008 1.308 0.632 9X 4.222 0.002 0.435 0.462 10Y 17.030 0.008 1.548 0.524 9X 11.580 0.006 0.698 0.790 9Y 18.697 0.009 1.474 0.604 9X 1.596 0.001 0.135 0.561 9Y 11.380 0.005 0.858 0.631 9X 5.667 0.003 0.235 1.149 8Y 2.252 0.001 0.070 1.526 7

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data.

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

38 19Displacement @Ground surface

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response DifferenceRate (%) Score

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

74 37

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

(1) Total - All 145(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 72

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 18 9

d Displacement @Flexible Joint 15 7

Page 25: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 2Evaluation: Method 3, Arias Intensity

(1) (2)X 0.041 0.030 26.056 6Y 0.362 0.315 12.911 8X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.080 0.056 29.768 6Y 0.362 0.338 6.666 9X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.075 0.046 38.868 5Y 0.374 0.339 9.297 9X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.018 0.021 13.574 8Y 0.303 0.285 5.665 9X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---

: Less reliable results with Noise (2) Total - Reliable Data Only 35

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 17 9

d Displacement @Flexible Joint --- ---

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

(1) Total - All 60

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. substracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data.

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

14 8Displacement @Ground surface

Direction AI Experiment AI Analysis DifferenceRate (%) Score

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

29 18

Page 26: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 2Evaluation: Method 4a, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 16.124 0.020 0.054 36.490 5Y 44.696 0.055 1.050 5.222 9X 81.669 0.100 0.682 14.683 8Y 82.953 0.102 1.153 8.831 9X 16.141 0.020 0.213 9.300 9Y 52.814 0.065 1.048 6.182 9X 36.151 0.044 0.198 22.355 6Y 62.352 0.077 1.364 5.609 9X 14.615 0.018 0.197 9.109 9Y 52.551 0.064 1.078 5.981 9X 35.830 0.044 0.201 21.892 6Y 78.644 0.096 1.290 7.478 9X 5.494 0.007 0.037 18.209 7Y 37.541 0.046 1.044 4.411 10X 10.843 0.013 0.070 19.022 7Y 2.441 0.003 0.028 10.852 8

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

Subtotal

c

d

66

17

15

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Score

a

b

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

(1) Total - All 129(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 72

31 18

36

10

8

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Total Difference Difference/data Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%)Direction

Page 27: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 2Evaluation: Method 4b, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 0.700 0.001 0.054 1.584 7Y 3.304 0.004 1.050 0.386 10X 5.734 0.007 0.682 1.031 8Y 4.384 0.005 1.153 0.467 10X 0.872 0.001 0.213 0.503 9Y 3.496 0.004 1.048 0.409 10X 4.107 0.005 0.198 2.540 6Y 4.352 0.005 1.364 0.392 10X 0.681 0.001 0.197 0.424 10Y 3.559 0.004 1.078 0.405 10X 3.148 0.004 0.201 1.923 7Y 4.679 0.006 1.290 0.445 10X 0.369 0.000 0.037 1.223 8Y 2.549 0.003 1.044 0.299 10X 1.494 0.002 0.070 2.621 6Y 0.167 0.000 0.028 0.743 9

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

35 20Displacement @Ground surface

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%) Score

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

72 40

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

(1) Total - All 140(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 79

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 18 10

d Displacement @Flexible Joint 15 9

Page 28: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Score Sheet

Team CTC

Case3 JR Takatori 50%

Page 29: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTC 1/2Case: 3

Test Analysis Test Analysis4.221 4.951

-4.439 -5.2624.364 4.177

-4.525 -4.37626.672 28.248

-53.431 -30.11733.968 24.421

-28.112 -23.9485.497 6.277

-6.508 -6.8415.371 5.256

-5.502 -6.02628.909 35.639

-68.054 -32.41244.890 31.735

-31.343 -29.2906.074 6.122

-6.922 -6.6015.870 5.101

-5.401 -6.04627.773 34.888

-65.535 -34.00740.182 31.330

-32.909 -28.7453.618 4.049

-3.675 -4.4053.922 3.925

-3.797 -4.3122.035 4.194

-2.434 -6.8392.933 0.745

-0.183 -0.730

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

a

b

c

d

Maximum/Minimum Redisual

---

---

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X

Y

-31.851

5.319

Direction

Acceleration @Ground surface

X

Y

Displacement @Ground surface

X

Y

---

-43.654

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X

Y

X

Y

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X

Y

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X

Y

-0.817

3.825

-3.948

11.827

-38.409

6.735

-1.909

2.804 0.309

-3.125

2.668

-0.603

3.239

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data fromall the data.

Displacement @Flexible Joint

X

Y

---

---

---

---

---

Page 30: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 3

Difference (%) Score Difference (%) Score (1) (2)17.30 718.56 7-4.27 10-3.28 105.91 9

-43.63 4-28.11 6-14.81 814.19 85.11 9

-2.14 109.52 9

23.28 6-52.37 3-29.30 6-6.55 90.79 10

-4.63 10-13.09 811.94 825.62 6

-48.11 4-22.03 6-12.65 811.93 819.86 70.09 10

13.57 8106.10 0180.96 0-74.59 2298.06 0

(1) Total of all results(2) Total of reliable results

2/2

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

232---

---

---

---

---

a

b

c

d 5

33

126

68

SubtotalMaximum/Minimum Redisual

Acceleration @Ground surface

X ---

Y ---

Direction

---

2

1

Displacement @Ground surface

X

Y

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X ---

Y ---

6

-87.61 1

-28.09

-98.13

-72.61

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X

Y

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X ---

-98.43

Displacement @Flexible Joint

X

Y

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X

Y

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

X ---

Y ---

-60.39

63.71

-88.97 1

2

2

1

Y

Page 31: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 3Evaluation: Method 2a, Time Histories with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 702.987 0.172 4.439 3.867 10Y 1,049.659 0.256 4.525 5.664 9X 97,605.929 23.830 53.431 44.598 4Y 9,739.589 2.378 33.968 7.000 9X 774.652 0.189 6.508 2.906 10Y 913.991 0.223 5.502 4.056 10X 151039.354 36.875 68.054 54.185 3Y 34129.636 8.332 44.890 18.562 7X 778.243 0.190 6.922 2.745 10Y 962.079 0.235 5.870 4.002 10X 132934.335 32.455 65.535 49.522 4Y 19271.463 4.705 40.182 11.709 8X 516.238 0.126 3.675 3.430 10Y 659.366 0.161 3.922 4.105 10X 5235.732 1.278 2.434 52.511 3Y 8748.167 2.136 2.933 72.807 2

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data.

119

Direction

---

a

b

c

d

(1) Total - All

32 ---

62 ---

20

(2) Total - Reliable Data Only

---

5 ---

Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response DifferenceRate (%) Score

Subtotal

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Page 32: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 3Evaluation: Method 2b, Time Histories with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 20.276 0.005 4.439 0.112 10Y 24.451 0.006 4.525 0.132 10X 1,626.128 0.397 53.431 0.743 9Y 208.821 0.051 33.968 0.150 10X 20.833 0.005 6.508 0.078 10Y 23.414 0.006 5.502 0.104 10X 2511.684 0.613 68.054 0.901 9Y 584.738 0.143 44.890 0.318 10X 19.962 0.005 6.922 0.070 10Y 24.174 0.006 5.870 0.101 10X 2215.014 0.541 65.535 0.825 9Y 351.552 0.086 40.182 0.214 10X 14.056 0.003 3.675 0.093 10Y 16.516 0.004 3.922 0.103 10X 93.600 0.023 2.434 0.939 9Y 145.742 0.036 2.933 1.213 8

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data.

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

39 ---Displacement @Ground surface

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response DifferenceRate (%) Score

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

78 ---

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

(1) Total - All 154(2) Total - Reliable Data Only ---

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 20 ---

d Displacement @Flexible Joint 17 ---

Page 33: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 3Evaluation: Method 3, Arias Intensity

(1) (2)X 0.819 0.845 3.200 10Y 0.839 0.834 0.583 10X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.933 0.993 6.364 9Y 0.899 0.953 6.001 9X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.924 0.960 3.926 10Y 0.908 0.957 5.415 9X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.739 0.754 1.962 10Y 0.771 0.802 4.074 10X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

20 ---Displacement @Ground surface

Direction AI Experiment AI Analysis DifferenceRate (%) Score

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

37 ---

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

(1) Total - All 77(2) Total - Reliable Data Only ---

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 20 ---

d Displacement @Flexible Joint --- ---

Page 34: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 3Evaluation: Method 4a, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 139.983 0.086 3.878 2.212 10Y 131.183 0.080 3.725 2.158 10X 3,188.773 1.954 34.670 5.636 9Y 835.508 0.512 31.188 1.642 10X 114.328 0.070 4.153 1.687 10Y 123.513 0.076 3.852 1.965 10X 4278.723 2.622 39.933 6.565 9Y 1099.408 0.674 38.352 1.757 10X 125.738 0.077 4.074 1.891 10Y 114.870 0.070 3.893 1.808 10X 3863.859 2.368 44.415 5.331 9Y 911.003 0.558 38.034 1.468 10X 76.278 0.047 3.936 1.187 10Y 78.033 0.048 3.647 1.311 10X 360.207 0.221 0.856 25.786 6Y 258.639 0.158 0.954 16.620 7

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Total Difference Difference/data Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%)Direction

(1) Total - All 150(2) Total - Reliable Data Only ---

39 ---

---

---

---

Subtotal

c

d

78

20

13

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Score

a

b

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Page 35: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: CTCCase: 3Evaluation: Method 4b, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 4.851 0.003 3.878 0.077 10Y 5.310 0.003 3.725 0.087 10X 561.308 0.344 34.670 0.992 9Y 53.723 0.033 31.188 0.106 10X 5.399 0.003 4.153 0.080 10Y 4.159 0.003 3.852 0.066 10X 859.371 0.527 39.933 1.319 8Y 184.441 0.113 38.352 0.295 10X 4.587 0.003 4.074 0.069 10Y 4.159 0.003 3.893 0.065 10X 757.302 0.464 44.415 1.045 8Y 101.848 0.062 38.034 0.164 10X 3.086 0.002 3.936 0.048 10Y 3.050 0.002 3.647 0.051 10X 37.088 0.023 0.856 2.655 6Y 50.225 0.031 0.954 3.228 5

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

39 ---Displacement @Ground surface

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%) Score

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

76 ---

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

(1) Total - All 146(2) Total - Reliable Data Only ---

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 20 ---

d Displacement @Flexible Joint 11 ---

Page 36: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Score Sheet

Team Takenaka

Case1 Step Sine 50 Gal in X-axis

Page 37: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: Takenaka 1/4Case: 1

Test Analysis Test Analysis1.019 0.717

-0.902 -0.6900.253 0.049

-0.232 -0.0431.393 0.676

-1.902 -0.6180.686 0.039

-0.662 -0.0321.169 0.686

-1.056 -0.6510.643 0.052

-0.739 -0.0490.803 0.549

-1.460 -0.5240.190 0.037

-0.219 -0.0471.188 0.751

-1.077 -0.7190.866 0.058

-0.607 -0.0530.856 0.772

-1.410 -0.7320.457 0.034

-0.358 -0.0560.838 0.690

-0.778 -0.6600.115 0.044

-0.137 -0.0390.043 0.006

-0.016 -0.0060.025 0.005

-0.009 0.000

: Less reliable results with Noise

Maximum/Minimum Redisual

Acceleration @Ground surface

X ---

Y ---

Y ---

Y 0.315 -0.002

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X ---

Displacement @Ground surface

X -0.424 0.027

Y 0.076 -0.010

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X -0.539 0.002

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X ---

Y ---

Y 0.204 0.013

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X -0.481 0.004

Y 0.004 0.001

X -0.032 0.006

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data fromall the data.

b

c

d

Direction

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

X ---

Y ---

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

a

Page 38: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: Takenaka 2/4Case: 1

Test Analysis Test Analysis0.600 0.620

-0.577 -0.6050.056 0.035

-0.086 -0.0360.593 0.615

-0.567 -0.5990.057 0.039

-0.065 -0.04213.487 17.755

--- ---14.002 15.351

--- ---0.600 0.620

-0.577 -0.6040.056 0.035

-0.086 -0.0360.593 0.616

-0.567 -0.5990.057 0.036

-0.065 -0.0410.021 0.001

-0.051 -0.0010.035 0.000

-0.015 0.000

: Less reliable results with Noise

Maximum/Minimum RedisualDirection

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(R) in Sand

X ---

Y ---

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(R) in Cement

X

Y

---

---

Bending Strain@

Shield Tunnel(R)

Horizontal

Vertical

13.709 2.988

9.312 10.562

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(F) in Cement

X ---

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(F) in Sand

X

Y ---

Y

---

---

Z 0.021 0.000

※Displacement and bending strain time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of thefirst 0.1 sec. data from all the data.

Displacement @FlexibleSegment

Y -0.061 -0.002

※f) Bending strains are absolute values, and therefore, minimum strain is ignored for grading.

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

h

g

f

e

Page 39: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 1

Difference (%) Score Difference (%) Score (1) (2)-29.63 6-23.44 6-80.56 1-81.53 1-51.46 3-67.53 2-94.31 1-95.17 1-41.31 4-38.30 5-91.89 1-93.43 1-31.57 5-64.10 2-80.38 1-78.68 2-36.78 5-33.29 5-93.28 1-91.19 1

-9.85 9-48.09 4-92.59 1-84.47 1-17.57 7-15.24 7-62.24 2-71.84 2-85.03 1-63.44 2-80.94 1-96.23 1

: Less reliable results with Noise (1)-1 Total of all above results(2)-1 Total of above reliable results

Maximum/Minimum Redisual

Acceleration @Ground surface

X ---

Y ---

---

Y ---

-106.35 0

Y -100.50 0

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X

Displacement @Ground surface

X

-100.34 0

Y -113.60 0

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X ---

Y ---

-100.89 0

Y -93.65 1

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X

-118.04 0

Y -82.64 1

Displacement @Flexible Joint

X

Direction

21 17

49 39

18 14

6 3

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

X ---

Y ---

9473

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

3/4

Subtotal

a

b

c

d

Page 40: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 1

Difference (%) Score Difference (%) Score (1) (2)3.35 104.85 10

-37.97 5-57.98 3

3.68 105.59 9

-31.72 5-36.41 531.65 5

--- ---9.63 9

--- ---3.33 104.72 10

-38.33 5-58.53 3

3.80 105.56 9

-36.74 5-37.73 5-93.88 1-98.57 1-99.27 1-98.34 1

: Less reliable results with Noise (1)-2 Total of all above results(2)-2 Total of above reliable results

(1)-1 + (1)-2 Total of all results

(2)-1 + (2)-2 Total of reliable results

Maximum/Minimum RedisualDirection

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(R) in Sand

X ---

Y ---

-78.21 2

13.42 8

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(R) in Cement

X

Y

---

---

Bending Strain@

Shield Tunnel(R)

Horizontal

Vertical

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(F) in Cement

X

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(F) in Sand

---

Y ---

X

Y

---

---

-97.49 1

Z -101.48 0

Displacement @FlexibleSegment

Y

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

Subtotal

143

4/4

e

f

g

h

237

151

78

57 39

24 ---

57 39

---5

Page 41: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 1Evaluation: Method 2a, Time Histories with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 388.652 0.185 1.019 18.154 7Y 102.083 0.049 0.253 19.220 7X 692.913 0.330 1.902 17.349 7Y 216.754 0.103 0.686 15.053 7X 459.758 0.219 1.169 18.726 7Y 195.334 0.093 0.739 12.583 8X 661.873 0.315 1.460 21.593 6Y 113.718 0.054 0.219 24.728 6X 481.375 0.229 1.188 19.297 7Y 201.910 0.096 0.866 11.103 8X 605.818 0.288 1.410 20.466 6Y 168.565 0.080 0.457 17.583 7X 324.803 0.155 0.838 18.465 7Y 56.164 0.027 0.137 19.548 7X 30.883 0.015 0.043 34.031 5Y 12.079 0.006 0.025 23.086 6X 70.808 0.034 0.600 5.621 9Y 40.614 0.019 0.086 22.500 6X 69.157 0.033 0.593 5.549 9Y 31.806 0.015 0.065 23.189 6

Hor. 11495.634 5.474 13.487 40.588 4Ver. 9479.236 4.514 14.002 32.237 5

X 75.340 0.036 0.600 5.980 9Y 28.459 0.014 0.086 15.766 7X 73.009 0.035 0.593 5.858 9Y 30.477 0.015 0.065 22.220 6Y 33.882 0.016 0.051 31.727 5Z 25.776 0.012 0.035 35.112 5

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Displacement and bending strain time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data

Displacement @Flexible Segment

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R)

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response DifferenceRate (%) Score

Subtotal

(1) Total - All 188

31

10

14

26

7

5

18

---

18

---

(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 88

a

b

c

d

e

g

f

h

28

55

14

11

30

9

Page 42: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 1Evaluation: Method 2b, Time Histories with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 12.316 0.006 1.019 0.575 9Y 2.846 0.001 0.253 0.536 9X 20.406 0.010 1.902 0.511 9Y 6.585 0.003 0.686 0.457 10X 14.165 0.007 1.169 0.577 9Y 5.936 0.003 0.739 0.382 10X 20.343 0.010 1.460 0.664 9Y 3.128 0.001 0.219 0.680 9X 14.997 0.007 1.188 0.601 9Y 6.022 0.003 0.866 0.331 10X 19.382 0.009 1.410 0.655 9Y 4.821 0.002 0.457 0.503 9X 10.240 0.005 0.838 0.582 9Y 1.524 0.001 0.137 0.531 9X 0.884 0.000 0.043 0.974 9Y 0.364 0.000 0.025 0.697 9X 1.947 0.001 0.600 0.155 10Y 1.102 0.001 0.086 0.611 9X 1.878 0.001 0.593 0.151 10Y 0.868 0.000 0.065 0.633 9

Hor. 302.139 0.144 13.487 1.067 8Ver. 271.049 0.129 14.002 0.922 9

X 2.066 0.001 0.600 0.164 10Y 0.776 0.000 0.086 0.430 10X 1.990 0.001 0.593 0.160 10Y 0.833 0.000 0.065 0.607 9Y 0.993 0.000 0.051 0.929 9Z 0.693 0.000 0.035 0.944 9

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Displacement and bending strain time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Displacement @Flexible Segment

Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R)

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

DifferenceRate (%) Score

Subtotal

a

b

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response

c

d

e

f

g

h

37 18

74 36

18 9

18 9

38 20

17 ---

39 20

18 ---

259112

(1) Total - All(2) Total - Reliable Data Only

Page 43: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 1Evaluation: Method 3, Arias Intensity

(1) (2)X 0.323 0.252 21.800 6Y 0.043 0.011 74.431 2X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.350 0.249 28.770 6Y 0.094 0.012 87.548 1X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.354 0.261 26.229 6Y 0.095 0.013 86.482 1X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.294 0.245 16.548 7Y 0.021 0.010 51.871 3X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.210 0.216 3.069 10Y 0.017 0.008 55.633 3X 0.207 0.214 2.942 10Y 0.014 0.008 39.594 5

Hor. --- --- --- ---Ver. --- --- --- ---

X 0.211 0.216 2.753 10Y 0.014 0.008 44.537 4X 0.207 0.214 3.275 10Y 0.014 0.008 43.552 4Y --- --- --- ---Z --- --- --- ---

: Less reliable results with Noise

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

8 6Displacement @Ground surface

Direction AI Experiment AI Analysis DifferenceRate (%) Score

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

14 12

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

f Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R) --- ---

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 10 7

d Displacement @Flexible Joint --- ---

e

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

28 20Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

(1) Total - All 88(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 65

h Displacement @Flexible Segment --- ---

g

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

28 20Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Page 44: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 1Evaluation: Method 4a, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 54.392 0.067 1.098 6.079 9Y 18.362 0.023 0.100 22.582 6X 133.308 0.164 1.097 14.916 7Y 59.064 0.072 0.305 23.742 6X 65.383 0.080 1.114 7.205 8Y 17.953 0.022 0.076 29.067 6X 118.586 0.146 1.386 10.498 8Y 18.129 0.022 0.102 21.736 6X 61.308 0.075 1.132 6.647 9Y 19.355 0.024 0.097 24.492 6X 100.418 0.123 1.385 8.894 8Y 29.155 0.036 0.278 12.877 7X 35.836 0.044 1.092 4.028 9Y 5.146 0.006 0.047 13.443 7X 2.892 0.004 0.032 11.065 8Y 1.390 0.002 0.011 15.822 7X 8.236 0.010 1.036 0.975 10Y 5.332 0.007 0.059 11.132 8X 7.132 0.009 1.030 0.849 10Y 3.275 0.004 0.055 7.275 9

Hor. 1212.107 1.487 3.876 38.375 5Ver. 552.805 0.678 5.828 11.638 8

X 8.229 0.010 1.040 0.971 10Y 3.548 0.004 0.022 19.858 7X 7.131 0.009 1.032 0.848 10Y 3.116 0.004 0.026 14.598 8Y 3.227 0.004 0.019 20.338 6Z 4.087 0.005 0.023 22.183 6

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Displacement @Flexible Segment

Direction Total Difference Difference/data

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R)

Subtotal

(1) Total - All 214(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 106

Score

12 ---

8

37 20

13 ---

35 20

f

g

h

28 16

58 33

16 9

15

a

b

c

d

e

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

Page 45: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 1Evaluation: Method 4b, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 3.304 0.004 1.098 0.369 10Y 0.781 0.001 0.100 0.960 9X 7.013 0.009 1.097 0.785 9Y 2.854 0.004 0.305 1.147 8X 4.222 0.005 1.114 0.465 10Y 0.734 0.001 0.076 1.189 8X 7.043 0.009 1.386 0.624 9Y 0.853 0.001 0.102 1.023 8X 3.964 0.005 1.132 0.430 10Y 0.833 0.001 0.097 1.054 8X 6.108 0.007 1.385 0.541 9Y 1.621 0.002 0.278 0.716 9X 2.620 0.003 1.092 0.295 10Y 0.288 0.000 0.047 0.751 9X 0.235 0.000 0.032 0.900 9Y 0.110 0.000 0.011 1.254 8X 0.464 0.001 1.036 0.055 10Y 0.296 0.000 0.059 0.618 9X 0.405 0.000 1.030 0.048 10Y 0.224 0.000 0.055 0.498 10

Hor. 60.786 0.075 3.876 1.924 7Ver. 41.290 0.051 5.828 0.869 9

X 0.473 0.001 1.040 0.056 10Y 0.163 0.000 0.022 0.915 9X 0.416 0.001 1.032 0.049 10Y 0.169 0.000 0.026 0.790 9Y 0.299 0.000 0.019 1.887 7Z 0.221 0.000 0.023 1.201 8

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

h Displacement @Flexible Segment 15 ---

g

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

38 20Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

(1) Total - All 251(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 116

f Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R) 16 ---

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 19 10

d Displacement @Flexible Joint 17 9

e

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

39 20

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

71 38

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

36 19Displacement @Ground surface

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%) Score

Page 46: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Score Sheet

Team Takenaka

Case2 Step Sine 50 Gal in Y-axis

Page 47: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: Takenaka 1/4Case: 2

Test Analysis Test Analysis0.303 0.049

-0.231 -0.0521.132 0.786

-1.178 -0.8170.504 0.028

-1.252 -0.0221.268 0.587

-1.567 -0.5490.419 0.056

-0.362 -0.0561.290 0.786

-1.574 -0.8400.155 0.029

-0.867 -0.0211.308 0.598

-1.259 -0.5360.435 0.066

-0.390 -0.0681.495 0.807

-1.548 -0.8570.141 0.035

-0.698 -0.0291.474 0.643

-1.421 -0.5870.135 0.049

-0.109 -0.0500.858 0.764

-0.848 -0.8040.004 0.001

-0.235 -0.0010.020 0.019

-0.070 -0.019

: Less reliable results with Noise

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

a

b

c

d

Direction

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

X ---

Y ---

Y -0.077 0.002

X -0.290 -0.007

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data fromall the data.

Y 0.127 0.007

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X -0.596 -0.011

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X ---

Y ---

Y 0.099 -0.051

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X -0.729 0.007

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X ---

Displacement @Ground surface

X -0.750 0.003

Y ---

Y -0.366 -0.002

Maximum/Minimum Redisual

Acceleration @Ground surface

X ---

Y ---

Page 48: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: Takenaka 2/4Case: 2

Test Analysis Test Analysis0.057 0.037

-0.045 -0.0430.679 0.697

-0.706 -0.7300.055 0.043

-0.048 -0.0460.656 0.678

-0.680 -0.7116.082 2.348

--- ---5.758 0.583

--- ---0.057 0.038

-0.045 -0.0430.679 0.698

-0.706 -0.7290.055 0.043

-0.048 -0.0460.656 0.678

-0.680 -0.7110.112 0.000

-0.048 0.0000.097 0.001

-0.054 -0.001

: Less reliable results with Noise

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

h

g

f

e

Z 0.067 0.000

※Displacement and bending strain time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of thefirst 0.1 sec. data from all the data.

Displacement @FlexibleSegment

Y 0.034 0.001

※f) Bending strains are absolute values, and therefore, minimum strain is ignored for grading.

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(F) in Cement

X ---

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(F) in Sand

X

Y ---

Y

---

---

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(R) in Cement

X

Y

---

---

Bending Strain@

Shield Tunnel(R)

Horizontal

Vertical

2.789 0.201

6.900 0.147

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(R) in Sand

X ---

Y ---

Maximum/Minimum RedisualDirection

Page 49: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 2

Difference (%) Score Difference (%) Score (1) (2)-83.74 1-77.42 2-30.60 5-30.64 5-94.42 1-98.27 1-53.72 3-64.97 2-86.56 1-84.52 1-39.05 5-46.62 4-81.38 1-97.63 1-54.28 3-57.46 3-84.84 1-82.58 1-46.01 4-44.60 4-75.41 2-95.88 1-56.39 3-58.71 3-63.79 2-54.64 3-10.96 8

-5.19 9-72.51 2-99.64 1

-3.97 10-72.93 2

: Less reliable results with Noise (1)-1 Total of all above results(2)-1 Total of above reliable results

9975

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

3/4

Subtotal

a

b

c

d

Direction

21 16

40 30

22 17

16 12

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

X ---

Y ---

-97.44 1

Y -103.11 0

Displacement @Flexible Joint

X

-98.23 1

Y -94.69 1

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X ---

Y ---

-100.98 0

Y -151.07 0

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X

Displacement @Ground surface

X

---

Y ---

-100.37 0

Y -99.48 1

Maximum/Minimum Redisual

Acceleration @Ground surface

X ---

Y ---

Page 50: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 2

Difference (%) Score Difference (%) Score (1) (2)-34.78 5

-5.10 92.71 103.34 10

-21.43 6-3.05 103.50 104.57 10

-61.40 2--- ---

-89.88 1--- ---

-33.52 5-4.88 102.81 103.29 10

-21.09 6-2.94 103.47 104.56 10

-99.58 1-99.97 1-99.08 1-98.39 1

: Less reliable results with Noise (1)-2 Total of all above results(2)-2 Total of above reliable results

(1)-1 + (1)-2 Total of all results

(2)-1 + (2)-2 Total of reliable results

250

155

80

70 40

5 ---

71 40

---5

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

Subtotal

151

4/4

e

f

g

h-95.80 1

Z -100.04 0

Displacement @FlexibleSegment

Y

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(F) in Cement

X

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(F) in Sand

---

Y ---

X

Y

---

---

-92.79 1

-97.87 1

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(R) in Cement

X

Y

---

---

Bending Strain@

Shield Tunnel(R)

Horizontal

Vertical

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(R) in Sand

X ---

Y ---

Maximum/Minimum RedisualDirection

Page 51: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 2Evaluation: Method 2a, Time Histories with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 90.666 0.043 0.303 14.261 8Y 521.611 0.248 1.178 21.082 6X 628.354 0.299 1.252 23.900 6Y 545.560 0.260 1.567 16.577 7X 173.421 0.083 0.419 19.725 7Y 520.187 0.248 1.574 15.736 7X 522.766 0.249 0.867 28.699 6Y 661.003 0.315 1.308 24.055 6X 159.798 0.076 0.435 17.479 7Y 535.082 0.255 1.548 16.464 7X 418.056 0.199 0.698 28.535 6Y 615.104 0.293 1.474 19.874 7X 50.191 0.024 0.135 17.657 7Y 359.567 0.171 0.858 19.950 7X 205.734 0.098 0.235 41.703 4Y 39.007 0.019 0.070 26.430 6X 29.256 0.014 0.057 24.459 6Y 66.537 0.032 0.706 4.486 10X 34.490 0.016 0.055 29.801 6Y 50.502 0.024 0.680 3.539 10

Hor. 3353.706 1.597 6.082 26.256 6Ver. 3183.435 1.516 5.758 26.326 6

X 18.130 0.009 0.057 15.157 7Y 69.259 0.033 0.706 4.670 10X 17.143 0.008 0.055 14.812 8Y 54.934 0.026 0.680 3.849 10Y 79.830 0.038 0.112 33.800 5Z 65.401 0.031 0.097 32.091 5

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Displacement and bending strain time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data

(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 93

a

b

c

d

e

g

f

h

27

53

14

10

32

12

ScoreSubtotal

(1) Total - All 193

35

10

13

27

7

6

20

---

20

---

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response DifferenceRate (%)

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Flexible Segment

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R)

Page 52: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 2Evaluation: Method 2b, Time Histories with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 2.594 0.001 0.303 0.408 10Y 16.807 0.008 1.178 0.679 9X 17.626 0.008 1.252 0.670 9Y 15.981 0.008 1.567 0.486 10X 5.073 0.002 0.419 0.577 9Y 16.117 0.008 1.574 0.488 10X 15.380 0.007 0.867 0.844 9Y 18.937 0.009 1.308 0.689 9X 4.669 0.002 0.435 0.511 9Y 16.923 0.008 1.548 0.521 9X 11.954 0.006 0.698 0.816 9Y 18.159 0.009 1.474 0.587 9X 1.382 0.001 0.135 0.486 10Y 11.602 0.006 0.858 0.644 9X 5.586 0.003 0.235 1.132 8Y 1.238 0.001 0.070 0.839 9X 0.792 0.000 0.057 0.662 9Y 2.027 0.001 0.706 0.137 10X 0.922 0.000 0.055 0.796 9Y 1.423 0.001 0.680 0.100 10

Hor. 97.150 0.046 6.082 0.761 9Ver. 99.896 0.048 5.758 0.826 9

X 0.503 0.000 0.057 0.421 10Y 2.104 0.001 0.706 0.142 10X 0.468 0.000 0.055 0.405 10Y 1.521 0.001 0.680 0.107 10Y 2.256 0.001 0.112 0.955 9Z 1.812 0.001 0.097 0.889 9

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Displacement and bending strain time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data

h Displacement @Flexible Segment 18 ---

g

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

40 20Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

(1) Total - All 261(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 114

f Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R) 18 ---

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 19 9

d Displacement @Flexible Joint 17 9

e

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

38 20

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

73 37

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

38 19Displacement @Ground surface

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response DifferenceRate (%) Score

Page 53: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 2Evaluation: Method 3, Arias Intensity

(1) (2)X 0.041 0.012 70.046 2Y 0.362 0.253 30.007 5X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.080 0.013 83.115 1Y 0.362 0.254 29.935 6X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.075 0.016 78.646 2Y 0.374 0.258 30.882 5X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.018 0.012 35.642 5Y 0.303 0.245 19.091 7X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.012 0.009 29.434 6Y 0.212 0.218 2.857 10X 0.014 0.009 35.481 5Y 0.207 0.214 3.492 10

Hor. --- --- --- ---Ver. --- --- --- ---

X 0.011 0.009 24.209 6Y 0.210 0.218 3.545 10X 0.012 0.009 24.042 6Y 0.206 0.214 3.683 10Y --- --- --- ---Z --- --- --- ---

: Less reliable results with Noise

h Displacement @Flexible Segment --- ---

g

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

32 20Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

(1) Total - All 96(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 63

f Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R) --- ---

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 12 7

d Displacement @Flexible Joint --- ---

e

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

31 20

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

14 11

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

7 5Displacement @Ground surface

Direction AI Experiment AI Analysis DifferenceRate (%) Score

Page 54: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 2Evaluation: Method 4a, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 14.483 0.018 0.054 32.773 5Y 69.202 0.085 1.050 8.085 8X 84.595 0.104 0.682 15.209 7Y 129.125 0.158 1.153 13.746 7X 31.823 0.039 0.213 18.336 7Y 63.708 0.078 1.048 7.457 8X 51.551 0.063 0.198 31.912 5Y 128.748 0.158 1.364 11.582 8X 27.038 0.033 0.197 16.853 7Y 67.404 0.083 1.078 7.671 8X 46.339 0.057 0.201 28.304 6Y 134.608 0.165 1.291 12.798 7X 4.710 0.006 0.037 15.612 7Y 39.674 0.049 1.044 4.662 9X 10.914 0.013 0.070 19.145 7Y 2.640 0.003 0.028 11.736 8X 2.382 0.003 0.028 10.258 8Y 11.462 0.014 0.987 1.425 10X 2.925 0.004 0.051 7.069 9Y 8.304 0.010 0.981 1.038 10

Hor. 351.500 0.431 3.017 14.294 8Ver. 209.548 0.257 1.494 17.206 7

X 1.998 0.002 0.019 12.686 8Y 12.320 0.015 0.977 1.548 10X 1.769 0.002 0.028 7.648 9Y 8.148 0.010 0.978 1.023 10Y 12.165 0.015 0.090 16.532 7Z 11.881 0.015 0.085 17.206 7

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

f

g

h

27 15

56 31

16 9

15

a

b

c

d

e

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

Subtotal

(1) Total - All 217(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 103

Score

14 ---

8

37 20

15 ---

37 20Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Displacement @Flexible Segment

Direction Total Difference Difference/data

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R)

Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Page 55: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 2Evaluation: Method 4b, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 0.576 0.001 0.054 1.302 8Y 4.707 0.006 1.050 0.550 9X 5.788 0.007 0.682 1.041 8Y 6.257 0.008 1.153 0.666 9X 1.699 0.002 0.213 0.979 9Y 4.523 0.006 1.048 0.529 9X 4.383 0.005 0.198 2.713 6Y 7.652 0.009 1.364 0.688 9X 1.447 0.002 0.197 0.902 9Y 4.600 0.006 1.078 0.523 9X 3.409 0.004 0.201 2.082 6Y 7.101 0.009 1.291 0.675 9X 0.233 0.000 0.037 0.773 9Y 3.134 0.004 1.044 0.368 10X 1.514 0.002 0.070 2.656 6Y 0.354 0.000 0.028 1.572 7X 0.111 0.000 0.028 0.477 10Y 0.692 0.001 0.987 0.086 10X 0.187 0.000 0.051 0.452 10Y 0.472 0.001 0.981 0.059 10

Hor. 26.452 0.032 3.017 1.076 8Ver. 27.696 0.034 1.494 2.274 6

X 0.096 0.000 0.019 0.607 9Y 0.733 0.001 0.977 0.092 10X 0.088 0.000 0.028 0.380 10Y 0.471 0.001 0.978 0.059 10Y 0.822 0.001 0.090 1.117 8Z 0.745 0.001 0.085 1.079 8

: Less reliable results with Noise

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

h Displacement @Flexible Segment 16 ---

g

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

39 20Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

(1) Total - All 241(2) Total - Reliable Data Only 111

f Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R) 14 ---

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 19 10

d Displacement @Flexible Joint 13 7

e

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

40 20

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

66 36

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

34 18Displacement @Ground surface

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%) Score

Page 56: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Score Sheet

Team Takenaka

Case3 JR Takatori 50%

Page 57: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: Takenaka 1/4Case: 3

Test Analysis Test Analysis4.221 6.422

-4.439 -7.2044.364 3.585

-4.525 -3.45926.672 3.922

-53.431 -3.57333.968 3.171

-28.112 -2.3085.497 8.782

-6.508 -12.0565.371 3.986

-5.502 -3.49328.909 3.580

-68.054 -1.60244.890 4.783

-31.343 -1.9076.074 6.827

-6.922 -8.0605.870 3.576

-5.401 -3.53027.773 4.579

-65.535 -4.17640.182 4.306

-32.909 -2.0603.618 5.636

-3.675 -6.7213.922 3.386

-3.797 -3.3672.035 0.392

-2.434 -0.0552.933 0.034

-0.183 -0.382

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

a

b

c

d

Direction

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

X ---

Y ---

Y 2.804 0.379

X -1.909 -0.006

※Displacement time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data fromall the data.

Y 6.735 0.671

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X -38.409 -0.004

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X ---

Y ---

Y 11.827 3.580

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X -43.654 3.148

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X ---

Displacement @Ground surface

X -31.851 0.720

Y ---

Y 5.319 1.136

Maximum/Minimum Redisual

Acceleration @Ground surface

X ---

Y ---

Page 58: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: Takenaka 2/4Case: 3

Test Analysis Test Analysis3.422 3.953

-3.835 -4.1453.086 3.173

-2.875 -3.0273.444 3.741

-3.619 -3.8463.177 3.112

-2.767 -3.03187.118 111.145

--- ---284.978 66.525

--- ---3.422 3.969

-3.835 -4.1203.086 3.180

-2.875 -3.0263.444 3.745

-3.619 -3.8663.177 3.113

-2.767 -3.0292.060 0.002

-1.753 -0.0022.859 0.006

-2.557 -0.003

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

h

g

f

e

Z 0.838 0.003

※Displacement and bending strain time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of thefirst 0.1 sec. data from all the data.

Displacement @FlexibleSegment

Y -0.310 0.001

※f) Bending strains are absolute values, and therefore, minimum strain is ignored for grading.

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(F) in Cement

X ---

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(F) in Sand

X

Y ---

Y

---

---

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(R) in Cement

X

Y

---

---

Bending Strain@

Shield Tunnel(R)

Horizontal

Vertical

19.231 13.598

209.037 5.485

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(R) in Sand

X ---

Y ---

Maximum/Minimum RedisualDirection

Page 59: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 3

Difference (%) Score Difference (%) Score (1) (2)52.15 362.30 2

-17.85 7-23.54 6-85.30 1-93.31 1-90.67 1-91.79 159.75 385.24 1

-25.79 6-36.51 5-87.62 1-97.65 1-89.35 1-93.92 112.40 816.45 7

-39.08 5-34.64 5-83.51 1-93.63 1-89.28 1-93.74 155.80 382.90 1

-13.67 8-11.32 8-80.73 1-97.76 1-98.85 1108.38 0

(1)-1 Total of all above results(2)-1 Total of above reliable results

101---

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

3/4

Subtotal

a

b

c

d

Direction

24 ---

52 ---

20 ---

5 ---

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

X ---

Y ---

-99.66 1

Y -86.47 1

Displacement @Flexible Joint

X

-99.99 1

Y -90.04 1

Displacement @Shaft (F)

X

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

X ---

Y ---

-107.21 0

Y -69.73 2

Displacement @Shaft (R)

X

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

X

Displacement @Ground surface

X

---

Y ---

-102.26 0

Y -78.65 2

Maximum/Minimum Redisual

Acceleration @Ground surface

X ---

Y ---

Page 60: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 3

Difference (%) Score Difference (%) Score (1) (2)15.52 7

8.08 92.81 105.29 98.64 96.29 9

-2.06 109.56 9

27.58 6--- ---

-76.66 2--- ---

16.00 77.44 93.04 105.23 98.76 96.82 9

-2.01 109.50 9

-99.90 1-99.88 1-99.80 1-99.87 1

(1)-2 Total of all above results(2)-2 Total of above reliable results

(1)-1 + (1)-2 Total of all results

(2)-1 + (2)-2 Total of reliable results

265

---

---

72 ---

15 ---

72 ---

---5

Evaluation: Method 1, Max/Min, Residual

Subtotal

164

4/4

e

f

g

h-100.20 0

Z -99.67 1

Displacement @FlexibleSegment

Y

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(F) in Cement

X

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(F) in Sand

---

Y ---

X

Y

---

---

-29.29 6

-97.38 1

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel(R) in Cement

X

Y

---

---

Bending Strain@

Shield Tunnel(R)

Horizontal

Vertical

Acceleration @Shield Tunnel

(R) in Sand

X ---

Y ---

Maximum/Minimum RedisualDirection

Page 61: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 3Evaluation: Method 2a, Time Histories with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 1,272.610 0.606 4.439 13.653 8Y 1,191.176 0.567 4.525 12.536 8X 52,316.963 24.913 53.431 46.626 4Y 12,313.419 5.864 33.968 17.262 7X 1369.634 0.652 6.508 10.021 8Y 1192.152 0.568 5.502 10.318 8X 74695.476 35.569 68.054 52.266 3Y 19019.510 9.057 44.890 20.176 6X 1451.529 0.691 6.922 9.986 9Y 1224.837 0.583 5.870 9.937 9X 62719.548 29.866 65.535 45.573 4Y 13254.868 6.312 40.182 15.708 7X 1049.387 0.500 3.675 13.598 8Y 909.172 0.433 3.922 11.040 8X 3640.070 1.733 2.434 71.207 2Y 4243.422 2.021 2.933 68.883 2X 150.493 0.072 3.835 1.869 10Y 226.577 0.108 3.086 3.496 10X 109.560 0.052 3.619 1.442 10Y 99.274 0.047 3.177 1.488 10

Hor. 25123.965 11.964 87.118 13.733 8Ver. 353213.279 168.197 284.978 59.021 3

X 198.503 0.095 3.835 2.465 10Y 131.566 0.063 3.086 2.030 10X 85.865 0.041 3.619 1.130 10Y 93.415 0.044 3.177 1.400 10Y 829.659 0.395 2.060 19.176 7Z 1590.351 0.757 2.859 26.489 6

※Displacement and bending strain time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data

(2) Total - Reliable Data Only ---

a

b

c

d

e

g

f

h

27

54

16

4

40

11

ScoreSubtotal

(1) Total - All 205

40

13

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response DifferenceRate (%)

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Flexible Segment

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R)

Page 62: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 3Evaluation: Method 2b, Time Histories with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 61.791 0.029 4.439 0.663 9Y 46.679 0.022 4.525 0.491 10X 1,294.081 0.616 53.431 1.153 8Y 383.923 0.183 33.968 0.538 9X 66.390 0.032 6.508 0.486 10Y 49.279 0.023 5.502 0.426 10X 1838.581 0.876 68.054 1.287 8Y 533.677 0.254 44.890 0.566 9X 68.259 0.033 6.922 0.470 10Y 49.620 0.024 5.870 0.403 10X 1555.112 0.741 65.535 1.130 8Y 442.672 0.211 40.182 0.525 9X 51.290 0.024 3.675 0.665 9Y 38.116 0.018 3.922 0.463 10X 89.795 0.043 2.434 1.757 7Y 105.711 0.050 2.933 1.716 7X 5.932 0.003 3.835 0.074 10Y 6.181 0.003 3.086 0.095 10X 3.833 0.002 3.619 0.050 10Y 3.226 0.002 3.177 0.048 10

Hor. 922.440 0.439 87.118 0.504 9Ver. 8556.848 4.075 284.978 1.430 8

X 6.428 0.003 3.835 0.080 10Y 4.535 0.002 3.086 0.070 10X 3.190 0.002 3.619 0.042 10Y 2.857 0.001 3.177 0.043 10Y 25.860 0.012 2.060 0.598 9Z 42.500 0.020 2.859 0.708 9

※Displacement and bending strain time histories are zero-initialized at 0 sec. subtracting average of the first 0.1 sec. data from all the data

h Displacement @Flexible Segment 18 ---

g

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

40 ---Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

(1) Total - All 258(2) Total - Reliable Data Only ---

f Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R) 17 ---

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 19 ---

d Displacement @Flexible Joint 14 ---

e

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

40 ---

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

74 ---

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

36 ---Displacement @Ground surface

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Response DifferenceRate (%) Score

Page 63: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 3Evaluation: Method 3, Arias Intensity

(1) (2)X 0.813 0.819 0.734 10Y 0.824 0.714 13.401 8X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.928 0.786 15.322 7Y 0.893 0.695 22.158 6X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.918 0.858 6.519 9Y 0.901 0.712 20.985 6X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.735 0.776 5.644 9Y 0.765 0.683 10.707 8X --- --- --- ---Y --- --- --- ---X 0.623 0.660 5.819 9Y 0.597 0.631 5.620 9X 0.622 0.646 3.994 10Y 0.592 0.622 5.081 9

Hor. --- --- --- ---Ver. --- --- --- ---

X 0.621 0.660 6.268 9Y 0.597 0.631 5.599 9X 0.613 0.647 5.545 9Y 0.598 0.622 4.054 10Y --- --- --- ---Z --- --- --- ---

h Displacement @Flexible Segment --- ---

g

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

37 ---Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

(1) Total - All 137(2) Total - Reliable Data Only ---

f Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R) --- ---

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 17 ---

d Displacement @Flexible Joint --- ---

e

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

37 ---

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

28 ---

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

18 ---Displacement @Ground surface

Direction AI Experiment AI Analysis DifferenceRate (%) Score

Page 64: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 3Evaluation: Method 4a, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= abs [Test - Analysis])

(1) (2)X 303.484 0.186 3.878 4.796 10Y 249.892 0.153 3.725 4.111 10X 5,879.358 3.603 34.670 10.391 8Y 3,523.167 2.159 31.188 6.922 9X 317.951 0.195 4.153 4.691 10Y 215.205 0.132 3.852 3.423 10X 7228.837 4.429 39.933 11.092 8Y 4269.984 2.616 38.352 6.822 9X 280.820 0.172 4.074 4.224 10Y 242.579 0.149 3.893 3.818 10X 6791.058 4.161 44.415 9.369 9Y 3949.355 2.420 38.034 6.363 9X 248.510 0.152 3.936 3.869 10Y 159.458 0.098 3.647 2.679 10X 316.466 0.194 0.856 22.654 6Y 335.298 0.205 0.954 21.547 6X 75.571 0.046 3.518 1.316 10Y 48.917 0.030 3.058 0.980 10X 42.686 0.026 3.514 0.744 10Y 28.534 0.017 3.073 0.569 10

Hor. 4651.074 2.850 38.153 7.470 9Ver. 10614.480 6.504 58.550 11.108 8

X 76.164 0.047 3.419 1.365 10Y 46.004 0.028 3.196 0.882 10X 42.263 0.026 3.347 0.774 10Y 29.341 0.018 3.225 0.558 10Y 250.977 0.154 2.094 7.346 9Z 347.821 0.213 2.834 7.521 9

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

f

g

h

37 ---

75 ---

20 ---

12

a

b

c

d

e

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

Subtotal

(1) Total - All 259(2) Total - Reliable Data Only ---

Score

18 ---

---

40 ---

17 ---

40 ---Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Displacement @Flexible Segment

Direction Total Difference Difference/data

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R)

Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Acceleration @C&C Tunnel

Displacement @Flexible Joint

Acceleration @Ground surface

Displacement @Ground surface

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Page 65: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Team: TakenakaCase: 3Evaluation: Method 4b, Fourier Spectrum with difference (= RMS)

(1) (2)X 11.861 0.007 3.878 0.187 10Y 9.811 0.006 3.725 0.161 10X 674.176 0.413 34.670 1.192 8Y 223.995 0.137 31.188 0.440 10X 12.155 0.007 4.153 0.179 10Y 10.674 0.007 3.852 0.170 10X 872.792 0.535 39.933 1.339 8Y 305.937 0.187 38.352 0.489 10X 11.194 0.007 4.074 0.168 10Y 10.694 0.007 3.893 0.168 10X 818.711 0.502 44.415 1.129 8Y 262.414 0.161 38.034 0.423 10X 11.076 0.007 3.936 0.172 10Y 7.612 0.005 3.647 0.128 10X 33.585 0.021 0.856 2.404 6Y 56.306 0.035 0.954 3.618 5X 2.607 0.002 3.518 0.045 10Y 2.912 0.002 3.058 0.058 10X 1.607 0.001 3.514 0.028 10Y 1.495 0.001 3.073 0.030 10

Hor. 177.487 0.109 38.153 0.285 10Ver. 2109.165 1.292 58.550 2.207 6

X 2.956 0.002 3.419 0.053 10Y 2.001 0.001 3.196 0.038 10X 1.562 0.001 3.347 0.029 10Y 1.181 0.001 3.225 0.022 10Y 16.194 0.010 2.094 0.474 10Z 25.672 0.016 2.834 0.555 9

※Max. Spec. herein is "the maximum spectrum in frequency range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.

h Displacement @Flexible Segment 19 ---

g

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in Sand

40 ---Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (F) in

Cement

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in

Cement

(1) Total - All 260(2) Total - Reliable Data Only ---

f Bending Strain @Shield Tunnel (R) 16 ---

c Acceleration @C&C Tunnel 20 ---

d Displacement @Flexible Joint 11 ---

e

Acc. @ ShieldTunnel (R) in Sand

40 ---

b

Acceleration @Shaft (R)

76 ---

Displacement @Shaft (R)

Acceleration @Shaft (F)

Displacement @Shaft (F)

Subtotal

a

Acceleration @Ground surface

38 ---Displacement @Ground surface

Direction Total Difference Difference/data Max. Spec. DifferenceRate (%) Score

Page 66: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Appendix B

Comparison of Test and Analysis

Page 67: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Comparison of Test and Analysis

Time Histories

Case1 Step Sine 50 Gal in X-axis

Page 68: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

1/7

(a) Ground surface

Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 69: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

2/7

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid Joint Side

Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

1

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 70: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

3/7

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Flexible Joint Side

Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

1

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 71: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

4/7

(c) Cut-and-Cover Tunnel

Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

(d) Flexible Joint

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-0.05-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.01

00.010.020.03

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 72: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

5/7Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in Sand

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: Take

-0.1-0.08-0.06-0.04-0.02

00.020.040.060.08

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: Take

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: Take

-0.08-0.06-0.04-0.02

00.020.040.060.08

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: Take

Page 73: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

6/7Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in Sand

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: Take

-0.08-0.06-0.04-0.02

00.020.040.060.08

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axisTestAna: Take

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: Take

-0.06-0.04-0.02

00.020.040.060.08

0.1

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axisTestAna: Take

Page 74: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

7/7Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

(f) Shield Tunnel Bending Strain

(h) Flexible Segment along Shield Tunnel

02468

101214161820

0 5 10 15 20 25

Stra

in (μ

)

Time (sec)

Bending Strain in Horizontal Dir.TestAna: Take

02468

1012141618

0 5 10 15 20 25

Stra

in (μ

)

Time (sec)

Bending Strain in Vertical Dir.TestAna: Take

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl..

(mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-Dir.

TestAna: Take

-0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Z-Dir.TestAna: Take

Page 75: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Comparison of Test and Analysis

Time Histories

Case2 Step Sine 50 Gal in Y-axis

Page 76: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

1/7

(a) Ground surface

Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

-0.3-0.2

-0.10

0.10.20.3

0.4

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-1.5

-1.2-0.9-0.6-0.3

0

0.30.6

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 77: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

2/7

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid Joint Side

Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1

00.10.20.30.40.5

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-1

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

0

0.20.4

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 78: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

3/7

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Flexible Joint Side

Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1

00.10.20.30.40.5

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 79: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

4/7

(c) Cut-and-Cover Tunnel

Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

(d) Flexible Joint

-0.2-0.15-0.1

-0.050

0.050.1

0.150.2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-0.25

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-0.08-0.06

-0.04-0.02

00.020.04

0.06

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 80: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

5/7Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in Sand

-0.06-0.04

-0.020

0.020.040.06

0.08

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axisTestAna: Take

-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: Take

-0.06-0.04-0.02

00.02

0.040.060.08

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axisTestAna: Take

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: Take

Page 81: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

6/7Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in Sand

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

-0.08-0.06-0.04-0.02

00.020.040.060.08

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axisTestAna: Take

-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: Take

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: Take

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

0 5 10 15 20 25

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: Take

Page 82: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

7/7Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

(f) Shield Tunnel Bending Strain

(h) Flexible Segment along Shield Tunnel

01

23456

7

0 5 10 15 20 25

Stra

in (μ

)

Time (sec)

Bending Strain in Horizontal Dir.TestAna: Take

01

23456

7

0 5 10 15 20 25

Stra

in (μ

)

Time (sec)

Bending Strain in Vertical Dir.TestAna: Take

-0.06-0.03

00.030.06

0.090.120.15

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl..

(mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-Dir.TestAna: Take

-0.08

-0.04

0

0.04

0.08

0.12

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Z-Dir.TestAna: Take

Page 83: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Comparison of Test and Analysis

Time Histories

Case3 JR Takatori 50%

Page 84: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

1/7

(a) Ground surface

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

-8-6-4-202468

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-5-4-3-2-1012345

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-60-50-40-30-20-10

010203040

0 10 20 30 40

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-40-30-20-10

010203040

0 10 20 30 40

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 85: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

2/7

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid Joint Side

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-8-6

-4-2024

6

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-80

-60-40-20

020

4060

0 10 20 30 40

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-40-30-20-10

01020304050

0 10 20 30 40

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 86: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

3/7

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Flexible Joint Side

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

-10-8-6-4-202468

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-8-6-4-202468

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

0 10 20 30 40

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-40-30-20-10

01020304050

0 10 20 30 40

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 87: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

4/7

(c) Cut-and-Cover Tunnel

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

(d) Flexible Joint

-8-6-4-202468

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-5-4-3-2-1012345

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

-8-6-4-20

246

0 10 20 30 40

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in X-axisTestAna: CTCAna: Take

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

0 10 20 30 40

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 88: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

5/7

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in Sand

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

-5-4-3-2-1012345

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acc eleration in X-axis

TestAna: Take

-4-3-2-101234

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: Take

-5-4-3-2-1012345

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: Take

-4-3-2-101234

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: Take

Page 89: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

6/7Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in Sand

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

-5-4-3-2-1012345

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: Take

-4-3-2-101234

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: Take

-5-4-3-2-1012345

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: Take

-4-3-2-101234

0 10 20 30 40

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Time (sec)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: Take

Page 90: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

7/7

(f) Shield Tunnel Bending Strain

(h) Flexible Segment along Shield Tunnel

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 10 20 30 40

Stra

in (μ

)

Time (sec)

Bending Strain in Horizontal Dir.

TestAna: Take

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30 40

Stra

in (μ

)

Time (sec)

Bending Strain in Vertical Dir.

TestAna: Take

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

22.5

0 10 20 30 40

Dis

pl..

(mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Y-Dir.

TestAna: Take

-3-2

-10

123

4

0 10 20 30 40

Dis

pl. (

mm

)

Time (sec)

Displacement in Z-Dir.

TestAna: Take

Page 91: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Comparison of Test and Analysis

Fourier Spectra

Case1 Step Sine 50 Gal in X-axis

Page 92: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

1/14

(a) Ground surface

Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 93: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

2/14

(a) Ground surface

Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 94: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

3/14

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid Joint Side

Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 95: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

4/14

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid Joint Side

Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 96: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

5/14

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Flexible Joint Side

Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 97: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

6/14Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Flexible Joint Side

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 98: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

7/14Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

(c) Cut-and-Cover Tunnel

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 99: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

8/14

(d) Flexible Joint

Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 100: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

9/14Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in Sand

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 101: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

10/14Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 102: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

11/14Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in Sand

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 103: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

12/14Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 104: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

13/14Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

(f) Shield Tunnel Bending Strain

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Stra

in (μ

)

Frequency (Hz)

Bending Strain in Horizontal Dir.

Test

Ana: Take

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Stra

in (μ

)

Frequency (Hz)

Bending Strain in Vertical, Dir.

Test

Ana: Take

Page 105: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

14/14

(h) Flexible Segment along Shield Tunnel

Case: 1 (Step Sine 50Gal X-axis)

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacelement in Y-Dir.

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Z-Dir.

Test

Ana: Take

Page 106: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Comparison of Test and Analysis

Fourier Spectra

Case2 Step Sine 50 Gal in Y-axis

Page 107: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

1/14

(a) Ground surface

Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 108: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

2/14

(a) Ground surface

Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 109: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

3/14

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid Joint Side

Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 110: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

4/14

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid Joint Side

Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 111: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

5/14

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Flexible Joint Side

Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 112: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

6/14Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Flexible Joint Side

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 113: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

7/14Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

(c) Cut-and-Cover Tunnel

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 114: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

8/14

(d) Flexible Joint

Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 115: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

9/14Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in Sand

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 116: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

10/14Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 117: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

11/14Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in Sand

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0.04

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 118: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

12/14Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 119: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

13/14Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

(f) Shield Tunnel Bending Strain

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Stra

in (μ

)

Frequency (Hz)

Bending Strain in Horizontal Dir.

Test

Ana: Take

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Stra

in (μ

)

Frequency (Hz)

Bending Strain in Vertical, Dir.

Test

Ana: Take

Page 120: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

14/14

(h) Flexible Segment along Shield Tunnel

Case: 2 (Step Sine 50Gal Y-axis)

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacelement in Y-Dir.

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Z-Dir.

Test

Ana: Take

Page 121: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

Comparison of Test and Analysis

Fourier Spectra

Case3 JR Takatori 50%

Page 122: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

1/14

(a) Ground surface

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 123: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

2/14

(a) Ground surface

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 124: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

3/14

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid Joint Side

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

100

200

300

400

500

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 125: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

4/14

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Rigid Joint Side

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 126: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

5/14

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Flexible Joint Side

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 127: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

6/14Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

(b) Top of Vertical Shaft on Flexible Joint Side

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 128: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

7/14Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

(c) Cut-and-Cover Tunnel

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 129: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

8/14Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

(d) Flexible Joint

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Y-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in X-axis

TestAna: CTCAna: Take

Page 130: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

9/14Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in Sand

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 131: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

10/14Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

(e) Shield Tunnel (w/o flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 132: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

11/14Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in Sand

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 133: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

12/14Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

(g) Shield Tunnel (w/ flexible seg.) in C-mixed Sand

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in X-axis

Test

Ana: Take

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Acc

. (m

/s2 )

Frequency (Hz)

Acceleration in Y-axis

Test

Ana: Take

Page 134: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

13/14Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

(f) ShieldTunnel Bending Strain

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Stra

in (μ

)

Frequency (Hz)

Bending Strain in Horizontal Dir.

Test

Ana: Take

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Stra

in (μ

)

Frequency (Hz)

Bending Strain in Vertical, Dir.

Test

Ana: Take

Page 135: E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test ......02/23/2014 E-Defense Large-scaled Underground Structure Test Competition of Numerical Analysis Final Evaluation z Participants

14/14

(h) Flexible Segment along ShieldTunnel

Case: 3 (JR Takatori 50%)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacelement in Y-Dir.

Test

Ana: Take

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Dis

plac

emen

t (m

m)

Frequency (Hz)

Displacement in Z-Dir.

Test

Ana: Take