曲面の微分幾何 - kobe...
TRANSCRIPT
-
曲面の微分幾何—計算から眺めるいくつかの話題—
Masatoshi KOKUBU
Tokyo Denki University
January 09 2009
START Â
dviout: !ANFN5!pdf;!bdviout: je
-
One of (my) motivations:Wish to discover new surfaces which are interesting from
the (differential-)geometric viewpoint.
MenuPart 1 From Classical Minimal Surface Theory
Before Weierstrass-Enneper
After Weierstrass-Enneper
After Osserman
Part 2 Flat fronts and their analogue
Flat fronts in H3
W-fronts in H3
ª¢ 1(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Part 1 From Minimal Surface Theory
Definition
A surface S ⊂ E3 is said to be minimal if∀p ∈ S, ∃ a nbd U s.t. U has least area
among surfaces whose boundary equals ∂U.
A plane is a trivial example.
—18th century—
1740s Euler catenoidy = cosh(x)(catenary)
ª¢ 2(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Theorem 1 (Meusnier 1770s)
minimal ⇐⇒ mean curvature H = 0
1770s Meusnier catenoid, helicoid
(s cos t, s sin t, t)
ª¢ 3(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
–the first half of 19th century–
1835 Scherk Scherk’s surface, Scherk’s second surface
ez cos x − cos y = 0
sin z − sinh x sinh y = 0
ª¢ 4(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Weierstrass-Enneper formula–the latter half of 19th century–
Theorem 2
Suppose a surface is given by an isometric immersion
x = (x1, x2, x3) : (M2, ds2) → E3.x is minimal ⇐⇒ each xi is harmonic.
∃ local isothermal parameter (u, v), i.e., ds2 = λ(du2 + dv2),Setting z = u + iv, a minimal immersion x is given by a
real part of a null holomorphic immersion w.r.t z.
ª¢ 5(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Theorem 3 (Weierstrass, Enneper 1860s)
x(z) = Re∫ z
z0
(1 − g2, i(1 + g2), 2g
)f dz
where g, f holomorphic in z.
Crucial formula for pieces of minimal surface!
g is the Gauss map, i.e.,
g = (stereographic projection) ◦ N
pN
N(p)
ª¢ 6(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
1864 Enneper
g = z, f = 1
Re
z − z3
3i(z + z
3
3 )z2
1878 Henneberg
g = z, f = 1 − z−4
x(z) = Re
−z3
3 + z −1z +
13z3
iz33 + iz +
iz +
i3z3
z2 + 1z2
x(−1/z̄) = x(z) is satisfied!x defines x̌ : RP2 \ {[0]} → E3well. (branched at [1], [i].)
ª¢ 7(Â)
file:figures/henneberg-2.nbdviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Global study due to Osserman (1960s —)–the latter half of 19th century–
Theorem 4 (Osserman)
M: Riemann surface, g: meromorphic function on M,ω: a holomorphic 1-form on M.(i) {zeros of ω} = {poles of g} where ordpω = 2ordpg(ii)
∫1 − g2ω,
∫i(1 + g2)ω,
∫2gω have no real period
⇒Re
∫ (1 − g2, i(1 + g2), 2g
)ω (⋆)
is a conformal minimal immersion M → E3.“⇐” also holds.
(i′) {zeros of ω} ⊃ {poles of g} where ordpω ≥ 2ordpg(ii)⇒ (⋆) gives a branched minimal immersion M → E3.ª¢ 8(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Theorem 5 (Osserman)
x : M → E3 a complete minimal surface of finite totalcurvature
⇒M ∼= M̄ \ {p1, . . . , pn}Gauss map g extends meromorphically on M̄total curvature = −4π deg(g)
Theorem 6 (Osserman)
total curvature ≤ 4π(1 − genus(M) − #{ends})
When one wishes to construct an example of a complete
minimal surface of finite total curvature, one has to take
care about genus and punctured points of M, degree of g,and, of course, completeness.
ª¢ 9(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
1983 Jorge-Meeks M = Ĉ \ {1, ζ, ζ2} (ζ3 = 1)g = z2, ω = (z3 − 1)−2dz
(i) At z = 0, ω = 0 of order 4At z = 0, g = 0 of order 2
(ii)(
1−z4(z3−1)2 , i(
1+z4(z3−1)2),
2z2(z3−1)2
)has residue
(−49, 0, 0) at z = 1(29,
23√
3, 0) at z = ζ
(29,−2
3√
3, 0) at z = ζ2
(iii) ds2 = (|z|4+1)2
|z3−1|2
∃k-noid for ∀k ≥ 2.
ª¢ 10(Â)
file:figures/weierstrass-test.nbdviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
℘: Weierstrass’ ℘ function on C/{Z ⊕ Zi} (square torus)1981 Chen-Gackstatter
g =√
3π/2g2 ℘′/℘, ω = ℘ dz
M = T2 \ {1 point}tot. curv. = −8πexplict formula
1982 Costa
g = 2√
2π e1℘′ , ω = ℘ dz
M = T2 \ {3 points}tot. curv. = −12πembedded
explict formula
ª¢ 11(Â)
file:chenga.dvifile:costa.dvidviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
1980s – 90s After Jorge-Meeks, Chen-Gackstatter and
Costa, So many new minimal surfaces are discovered
(Hoffman, Meeks, Karcher, Kusner, Rosenberg, Lopez,
Ros, Rossman, Miyaoka, Sato, ..........)
2000s – Discovery is continuing! (Fujimori, Shoda, Traizet,
Weber, ..........)
ª¢ 12(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Part 2 Flat Front in H3H3: hyperbolic 3-space, i.e., simply-connected, complete
Riemannian 3-manifold of constant sectional curvature −1H3 is represented as Poincaré ball, upper half-space, etc.
flat front · · ·{flat = “Gauss curvature = 0”,front = “surface with ‘good’ singularities”
ª¢ 13(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Remarks
Fact [Volkov-Vladimirova(1972); S. Sasaki(1973)]
A complete flat surface immersed in H3 is a horosphereor a (hyperbolic) cylinder.
Hyperbolic Gauss maps G, G∗is defined for fronts (across the
singularities).
f (M2)
p
G(p)
G∗(p)
Theorem 7
flat ⇐⇒ G, G∗ : holomorphic w.r.t. holomorphicstructure compatible to the 2nd fundamental form
ª¢ 14(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Representation formula
Theorem 8 ((G, G∗)-formula)f : M2 → H3 = SL(2, C)/ SU(2) : a flat front with hyper-bolic Gauss maps G, G∗.⇐⇒ f = EE ∗ where
E =(
G/ξ ξG∗/(G − G∗)1/ξ ξ/(G − G∗)
)with ξ := exp
(∫ dGG − G∗
)
period condition for f = EE ∗
⇐⇒∫
γ
dGG − G∗
∈√−1R, ∀[γ] ∈ π1(M)
ª¢ 15(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Example 9 (flat fronts of revolution)
horosphere
hyperbolic cylinder
hourglass
snowman
M :=
{Ĉ \ {0} if α = 0Ĉ \ {0, ∞} otherwise,
G(z) = z,G∗(z) = αz (α ∈ R \ {1})
ª¢ 16(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Example 10 (n-noid)M := Ĉ \ {z|zn = 1}, G(z) = z, G∗(z) = z−n+1 (n = 2, 3, . . . )
Example 11 ((n + 2)-noid)M := Ĉ \ {0, ∞, zn = 1}, G(z) = z, G∗(z) = zn+1 (n = 1, 2, . . . )
Theorem 12 (KUY)
For a weakly complete flat front with regular ends,
deg G + deg G∗ ≥ #{ends}‘ =′ ⇐⇒ All ends are embedded.
ª¢ 17(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Construction of ”with ends at arbitrary positions”
Let p1, . . . , pn−1, ∞ be distinct points in ∂H3 = C ∪ {∞}.Choose non-zero real numbers a1, . . . , an−1 such that a1 +· · · + an−1 ̸= 0, 1.
M = C \ {p1, . . . , pn−1}G = z
G∗ =
(z ∑n−1k=1
{ak ∏j ̸=k
(z − pj
)}− ∏n−1j=1 (z − pj)
)∑n−1k=1
{ak ∏j ̸=k
(z − pj
)}⇒ a weakly complete flat front with embedded regular
ends at p1, . . . , pn−1, ∞.
Problem ∃ flat front having two different ends accu-mulating at the same point in ∂H3?
ª¢ 18(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Examples of higher genus
Example 13
Let ℘ denote the Weierstrass ℘ function on T = C/{Z1⊕Zi}(squared torus).
M = T \ {z ; ℘(3℘2 − e21) = 0}
G =1℘′
G∗ = −8e213
℘
℘′
⇒ a weakly complete flat front of genus one, with fiveembedded regular ends.
Figure
ª¢ 19(Â)
file:figures/torusfront.nbdviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Example 14
Consider a hyperelliptic Riemann surface
R : w2 = z(
z2k − 2czk−1 − 1)
=: zϕ(z)
where c =
{0 if k = 1k/(k − 1) if k > 1
of genus k.Set M := R \ {z ; z(zϕ(z))′ = 0}(= R \ {4k + 1 pts}).Then
G = w, G∗ =1
(2k + 1)w(2kzϕ(z) − z2ϕ′(z))
⇒ a weakly complete flat front of genus k, with 4k + 1embedded regular ends.
ª¢ 20(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Open Problem
Consider weakly complete flat fronts of genus k with nregular ends.
➀ For each k, What is the least number nmin(k) of n?➁ How about the same problem assuming ends must be
embedded?
In particular,
∃ genus-1 front with four embedded ends?
Genus-0 case is solved.
For positive genus case, we know nmin(k) ≤ 4k + 1 byprevious example; moreover, we know nmin(k) ≤ 2k + 3 byexistence therem (non-computational argument).
ª¢ 21(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
An analogueWe consider Weingarten surfaces in H3 satisfying
α(H − 1) = βK for some [α : β] ∈ RP1, (⋆)called a W-surface, for short, in this talk.
The class of W-surfaces includes
• flat surfaces (K = 0)• CMC-1 surfaces (H = 1)
It is natural to consider W-fronts rather than W-surfaces.
But CMC-1 fronts necessarily CMC-1 (regular) surface.
ª¢ 22(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
Theorem 15 (Representation formula)M : Riemann surface; G : meromorphic functionds2ϵ : metric on M with constant curvature ϵ⇒∃ W-front f : M → H3 with α(H − 1) = βK, α/(α − 2β) = ϵ
More precisely,
∃ a holomorphic map h : M̃ → S2 or C or D s. t. ds2ϵ =4|dh|2
(1+ϵ|h|2)2Using this h, define
G = (−Gh)−3/2[−GGh GGhh/2 − G2h−Gh Ghh/2
]and H =
[1+ϵ2|h|21+ϵ|h|2 −ϵh̄−ϵh 1 + ϵ|h|2
],
and set
f = GHG∗.Then f : M′(⊂ M) → H3 = PSL(2, C)/ PSU(2) is a Weingarten frontwith α(H − 1) = βK, α/(α − 2β) = ϵ.Here, M′ = M \ {π(pi), π(qi)} ;pi is the common zero of dh and {G; h}dh, qi is a pole of dh or{G; h}dh;and vise versa.
ª¢ 23(Â)
dviout: jfdviout: d6dviout: je
-
End of slides. Click [END] to finish the presentation.
Thank you.
ª END Bye ¢
dviout: !A!n!f;!bdviout: jfdviout: !A!n!f;!bdviout: fqdviout: d6