e n a y r r › ... · the essential triviality of the james bond in fact, sets off perfectly, by...

7
Warning Concerning Copyright Restrictions The Copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyright material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction not be "used for any purposes other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement.

Upload: others

Post on 10-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: e n a y r r › ... · The essential triviality of the James Bond in fact, sets off perfectly, by contrast, the depth, charm, integrity of Hitchcock ' s film. A film, whether light

War

ning

Con

cern

ing

Cop

yrig

ht R

estr

ictio

ns

The

Copy

right

law

of t

he U

nite

d St

ates

(Titl

e 17

, Uni

ted

Stat

es C

ode)

gov

erns

the

mak

ing

of p

hoto

copi

es o

r oth

er re

prod

uctio

ns o

f cop

yrig

ht m

ater

ial.

Und

er c

erta

inco

nditi

ons s

peci

fied

in th

e la

w, l

ibra

ries a

nd a

rchi

ves a

re a

utho

rized

to fu

rnish

aph

otoc

opy

or o

ther

repr

oduc

tion.

One

of t

hese

spec

ified

con

ditio

ns is

that

the

phot

ocop

yor

repr

oduc

tion

not b

e "u

sed

for a

ny p

urpo

ses o

ther

than

priv

ate

study

, sch

olar

ship

, or

rese

arch

." If

a us

er m

akes

a re

ques

t for

, or l

ater

use

s, a

phot

ocop

y or

repr

oduc

tion

for

purp

oses

in e

xces

s of "

fair

use,

" tha

t use

r may

be

liabl

e fo

r cop

yrig

ht in

fring

emen

t.

Page 2: e n a y r r › ... · The essential triviality of the James Bond in fact, sets off perfectly, by contrast, the depth, charm, integrity of Hitchcock ' s film. A film, whether light

5

NORTH BY NORTHWEST

· There are no symbols in North by Northwest . Oh yes! One. The last shot, the train entering the runnel after the love-scene between Grant and Eva-Marie Saint. It's a phallic symbol. But don't tell anyone.-Alfred Hitchcock, Cahiers du Cinema, No. 102.

Of Hitchcock's six most recent films, North by Northwest is that which corresponds most nearly to the conventional estimate of him as a pol· ished light entertainer. That, beside its immediate neighbors, it is a lightweight work, a relaxation, in which we see Hitchcock working at something less than full pressure, I do not deny. That it is trivial or frivolous, not worth serious attention, [reject absolutely. When I spoke of the unbroken series of masterpieces from Vertigo to Mamie, I had not forgotten North by Northwest.

A light entertainment can have depth, subtlety, finesse, it can embody mature moral values; indeed, it seems to me that it must. If I fail to be entertained by Goldfinger, it is because there is nothing there to engage or retain the attention; the result is a nonentity, consequently tedious. The essential triviality of the James Bond in fact, sets off perfectly, by contrast, the depth, the charm, the integrity of Hitchcock's film.

A film, whether light entertainment or not, is either a work of art or · it is nothing. And the basic essential of a work of art is that it be

thematically organic. Goldfinger is a collection of bits, carefully calcu· lated with both eyes on the box office, put end to end with no deeper necessity for what happens next than mere plot; nothing except plot develops in· the course of it, and, obviously, the essence of an organic construction is development. But Goldfinger, [ shall be reminded, doesn't take itself seriously: so much the worse for it. And if ir doesn't why

Page 3: e n a y r r › ... · The essential triviality of the James Bond in fact, sets off perfectly, by contrast, the depth, charm, integrity of Hitchcock ' s film. A film, whether light

HIT

CH

CO

CK

'S F

ILM

S

shqu

ld a

nyon

e el

se?-

for I

find

it d

iffic

ult t

o se

e ho

w th

e ad

ult m

ind

can

occu

py it

self

with

som

ethi

ng t

hat c

anno

t, in

som

e se

nse,

be

take

n se

ri-ou

sly.

Nor

th b

y N

orth

wes

t, on

the

leve

l of

plo

t (if

one

can

im

agin

e its

pl

ot d

ivor

ced

from

its

subj

ect,

whi

ch is

mor

e di

ffic

ult t

han

may

at

first

appe

ar),

also

doe

sn't

take

its

elf

serio

usly

: w

e ar

e no

t, in

oth

er w

ords

, ex

pect

ed t

o be

lieve

, lite

rally

, thi

s co

uld

happ

en.

But

it is

a v

ery

supe

rfi-

cial

gla

nce

that

see

s no

mor

e th

ere

than

the

plo

t. T

he t

ongu

e-in

-che

ek

elem

ent o

n pl

ot le

vel h

as th

e fu

nctio

n of

dir

ectin

g ou

r at

tent

ion

to o

ther

le

vels.

On

the

othe

r ha

nd t

he s

elf-

moc

king

asp

ect o

f th

e B

ond

film

s is

mer

ely

a ve

ry s

hrew

d m

eans

of

perm

ittin

g th

e sp

ecta

tor

to in

dulg

e an

y pe

ncha

nt f

or s

adis

m a

nd .s

exua

l "k

icks

" he

may

hav

e w

ithou

t an

y ac

-co

mpa

nyin

g di

scom

fort

. Th

e so

ciol

ogis

t and

the

criti

c ha

ve te

rrito

ry in

com

mon

, cer

tain

ly; b

ut

Gol

dfin

ger a

nd it

s su

cces

s, th

e w

ide

popu

lar a

nd c

ritic

al s

ucce

ss o

f a fi

lm

that

has

sca

rcel

y m

ore

to o

ffer

than

a b

oys'

com

ic p

aper

, see

ms

to m

e to

be

long

stri

ctly

to

the

soci

olog

ist.

Even

to

com

pare

it

with

Nor

th b

y N

orth

wes

t w

ill s

eem

slig

htly

rid

icul

ous

to H

itchc

ock'

s ad

mir

ers,

but

a

mom

ent's

ref

lect

ion

will

be

enou

gh t

o re

min

d th

em t

hat

the

obvi

ous

dist

inct

ion

betw

een

the

two

film

s ha

s no

t bee

n m

ade

ever

ywhe

re.

I ha

ve a

llow

ed t

hat

Nor

th b

y N

orth

wes

t is

a co

mpa

rativ

ely

rela

xed

film

, a

dive

rtis

sem

ent;

that

is

to s

ay,

one

mus

t no

t de

man

d of

it t

he

conc

entr

ated

sig

nific

ance

, th

e ex

trao

rdin

arily

clo

se-k

nit o

rgan

izat

ion

of

Vert

igo

and

Psyc

ho.

Nev

erth

eles

s, it

has

a c

oher

ent a

nd s

atis

fyin

g de

vel-

opm

ent,

a co

nstr

uctio

n su

ffici

ently

str

ong

and

clea

r to

ass

imila

te t

he

occa

sion

al c

harm

ing

but i

rrel

evan

t litt

le j

eux

d'es

prit

(the

stra

nge

lady

's re

actio

n to

Car

y G

rant

's n

octu

rnal

pas

sage

thr

ough

her

bed

room

as

he

esca

pes

from

the

hot

el i

n w

hich

the

hea

d of

the

C.I.

A.

has

impr

ison

ed

him

) pe

rmis

sibl

e in

a w

ork

of th

is n

atur

e. L

ike

Vert

igo

(to w

hich

it i

s al

so l

inke

d th

roug

h its

equ

ivoc

al h

eroi

ne),

it ca

n be

reg

arde

d as

fal

ling

into

thre

e m

ovem

ents

cor

resp

ondi

ng to

the

mai

n st

ages

in t

he e

volu

tion

of th

e he

ro's

attit

ude.

The

firs

t lig

htly

ske

tche

s al

l th

at is

rel

evan

t (fo

r th

e pu

rpos

es o

f th

e fil

m)

of h

is ge

nera

l si

tuat

ion

and

outlo

ok, a

nd h

as

him

mis

take

n fo

r G

eorg

e K

apla

n an

d w

ante

d by

bot

h sp

ies

and

polic

e;

it cl

oses

with

the

rev

elat

ion

that

Geo

rge

Kap

lan

does

n't

exis

t. Th

e se

cond

see

s hi

m i

nvol

ved

with

Eve

Ken

dall

and

trac

es t

he a

brup

t shi

fts

in h

is r

elat

ions

hip

with

her

as

he (

as w

ell

as t

he s

pect

ator

) be

com

es

incr

easi

ngly

fru

stra

ted,

baf

fled,

dis

illus

ione

d, b

y th

e am

bigu

ity o

f he

r po

sitio

n an

d be

havi

or.

The

last

mov

emen

t be

gins

whe

n he

lea

rns

the

NO

RTH

IIY

NO

RTH

WE

ST

Ill

trut

h ab

out

her

and

-th

e re

al t

urni

ng p

oint

of

the

acce

pts

his

role

as

Kap

lan,

and

cul

min

ates

in

the

cem

entin

g of

the

ir

rela

tions

hip.

N

orth

by

Nor

thw

est

bear

s an

obv

ious

res

embl

ance

to

both

The

39

Step

s an

d Sa

bote

ur;

its i

mm

ense

sup

erio

rity

to b

oth

film

s sc

arce

ly n

eeds

to

be

argu

ed·,

but i

t is

wor

th n

otin

g th

at H

itchc

ock

him

self,

whe

n as

ked

why

he

had

rem

ade

Sabo

teur

, re

plie

d th

a·t in

the

ear

lier f

ilm t

he c

hara

c-te

rs w

ere

not

inte

rest

ing,

and

tha

t he

mad

e an

ele

men

tary

mis

take

in

havi

ng t

he v

illai

n, n

ot t

he h

ero,

dan

gle

from

the

top

of

the

Stat

ue o

f L

iber

ty. T

he s

econ

d po

int i

s by

no

mea

ns a

tri

vial

one

, and

is i

ntim

atel

y co

nnec

ted

with

.the

firs

t. It

is n

ot s

o m

uch

a gr

eate

r co

mpl

exity

of

the

char

acte

rs in

Nor

th b

y N

orth

wes

t tha

t mak

es th

em m

ore

inte

rest

ing,

but

th

eir

rela

tions

hip

to t

he a

ctio

n. B

oth

The

39 S

teps

and

Sab

oteu

r ha

ve

hero

es q

uite

unp

redi

ctab

ly a

nd a

brup

tly p

lung

ed in

to h

air-

rais

ing

adve

n-tu

res,

but

the

adve

ntur

es b

ear

no r

eally

org

anic

rela

tions

hip

to th

e m

en;

ther

e is

not t

he s

ame

poin

t in

thes

e th

ings

hap

peni

ng to

Ric

hard

Han

nay

and

the

hero

of S

abot

eur

as t

here

is in

the

ir h

appe

ning

to

Rog

er T

horn

-hi

ll. S

imila

rly,

ther

e is

no p

oint

at

all

in h

avin

g Fr

y (th

e "s

abot

eur"

of

the

title

) han

g by

his

coat

slee

ves

from

the

Sta

tue

of L

iber

ty, b

eyon

d th

e pr

olon

ging

of

a si

mpl

e su

spen

se ·a

s an

end

in it

self

; th

ere

is ev

ery

poin

t in

Rog

er T

horn

hill,

the

prev

ious

ly ir

resp

onsi

ble,

una

ttach

ed a

dver

tisin

g m

an, h

avin

g to

han

g· o

nto

a le

dge

on M

ount

Rus

hmor

e by

one

han

d,

hold

ing

the

wom

an h

e lo

ves

by t

he o

ther

, w

hile

the

hom

osex

ual

spy

Leon

ard,

the

film

's ul

timat

e re

pres

enta

tive

of th

e st

erile

and

des

truc

tive,

gr

inds

the

han

d w

ith h

is f

oot.[

2.o]

The

diff

eren

ce c

an b

e su

mm

ed u

p (w

ith s

ome

unfa

irnes

s in

sim

plifi

catio

n to

the

earl

ier f

ilms)

by

sayi

ng th

at

Nor

th b

y N

orth

wes

t has

a s

ubje

ct a

s w

ell a

s a

plot

. In

fac

t, at

a d

eepe

r le

vel

the

film

has

mor

e in

com

mon

wit

h Re

ar

Win

dow

than

with

Sab

oteu

r or

The

39

Step

s. T

hd

ilm

beg

ins w

ith s

hots

of

New

Yor

k tra

ffic

and

New

Yor

k cr

owds

: a

sens

e of

app

aren

tly

aim

less

and

cha

otic

bus

tle a

nd m

ovem

ent.

From

thi

s em

erge

s R

oger

Th

ornh

ill, d

icta

ting

to h

is s

ecre

tary

on

his

way

hom

e by

lift

, cr

owde

d pa

vem

ent,

taxi

·: em

erge

s fr

om it

as

its ty

pica

l rep

rese

ntat

ive

and

prod

uct.

In a

n ex

posi

tion

of m

aste

rly c

ompr

essi

on w

e le

arn

all t

he e

ssen

tial t

hing

s ab

out

him

: he

, is

bras

h, f

ast-t

alki

ng,

over

-con

fide

nt o

n th

e su

rfac

e; e

n-tir

ely

irres

pons

ible

and

inco

nsid

erat

e of

oth

ers

(he

clie

ats

two

peop

le o

ut

of th

eir t

axi b

y pr

eten

ding

his

sec

reta

ry is

ill,

then

che

erfu

lly ju

stifi

es th

is to

her

by

telli

ng h

er h

e ha

s m

ade

the

othe

r m

an "

feel

lik

e a

Goo

d

Page 4: e n a y r r › ... · The essential triviality of the James Bond in fact, sets off perfectly, by contrast, the depth, charm, integrity of Hitchcock ' s film. A film, whether light

134

HIT

CH

CO

CK

'S F

ILM

S

Sam

arita

n");

a h

eavy

dri

nker

; a

divo

rce

(twic

e, i

t tra

nspi

res)

; su

rpri

s-in

gly

dom

inat

ed b

y hi

s m

othe

r, w

ho, h

e sa

ys, i

s "l

ike

a bl

oodh

ound

" in

st

ill s

niff

ing

his

brea

th to

find

out

if h

e ha

s be

en d

rink

ing.

Ind

eed,

he

is a

man

who

live

s pu

rely

on

the

surf

ace,

refu

sing

all

com

mitm

ent o

r res

pon-

sibi

lity

(app

ropr

iate

ly,

he is

in

adve

rtisi

ng),

imm

atur

e fo

r al

l hi

s co

ck-

sure

ness

, hi

s lif

e al

l th

e m

ore

a ch

aos

for

the

fact

tha

t he

doe

sn't

reco

gniz

e it

as s

uch;

a m

an w

ho re

lies

abov

e al

l on

the

exte

rior

trap

ping

s of

mod

ern

civi

liza

tion

-bus

ines

s of

fices

, co

ckta

il ba

rs,

mac

hine

s-fo

r pr

otec

tion,

who

sub

stitu

tes

bust

le a

nd s

peed

for

a s

ense

of d

irec

tion

or

purp

ose:

a m

oder

n ci

ty E

very

man

, who

se c

harm

and

·self-

conf

iden

ce a

nd

smar

tnes

s m

ake

him

esp

ecia

lly e

asy

for

the

spec

tato

r to

iden

tity

with

, so

that

at t

he s

tart

we

are

scar

cely

con

scio

us o

f his

limita

tions

as

a hu

man

be

ing.

We

can

quite

hap

pily

and

tho

ught

less

ly a

ttach

our

selv

es t

o hi

s sm

ug c

onfi

denc

e in

bei

ng in

con

trol

of h

is e

nvir

onm

ent.

And

the

n, a

brup

tly,

with

in t

en m

inut

es o

f th

e st

art

of th

e fil

m,

the

grou

nd i

s cu

t aw

ay f

rom

und

er h

is/o

ur f

eet.

Hitc

hcoc

k's

sens

e of

the

pr

ecar

ious

ness

of

all

hum

an o

rder

has

nev

er b

een

mor

e be

autif

ully

ex-

pres

sed

(thou

gh c

onve

yed

else

whe

re-i

n Th

e W

rong

Man

and

The

Bird

s, fo

r in

stan

ce-w

ith

grea

ter

inte

nsity

and

ove

rt s

erio

usne

ss)

thim

in

the

mis

take

, du

e to

she

er c

hanc

e, b

y w

hich

Tho

rnhi

ll, g

oing

to

send

a

tele

gram

to h

is m

othe

r, fi

nds

him

self

kidn

appe

d by

gun

men

. In

the

lobb

y of

a c

row

ded

hote

l, in

who

se lo

unge

bar

he

has

just

bee

n dr

inki

ng w

ith

asso

ciat

es, c

haos

abr

uptly

take

s ov

er.

The

rem

aind

er o

f th

e fil

m's

first

mov

emen

t is

devo

ted

to a

sys

tem

atic

st

ripp

ing

away

of a

ll th

e pr

otec

tive

arm

or o

f mod

ern

city

man

on

whi

ch

Thor

nhill

rel

ies

for

his

safe

ty.

ln t

he m

idst

of

crow

ds,

he b

ecom

es

com

plet

ely

isol

ated

. Th

e op

port

unis

t has

bee

n de

feat

ed b

y ch

ance

. The

m

an w

ho d

epri

ved

othe

rs o

f the

ir ta

xi is

im

pris

oned

in a

car

he

can'

t get

ou

r of

, un

able

eve

n to

attr

act

atte

ntio

n. H

e is

take

n to

the

hou

se o

f a

Mr.

Tow

nsen

d w

here

all

his

"pro

ofs"

of

iden

tity

are

disd

ainf

ully

re-

fuse

d. T

he h

eavy

dri

nker

is f

orce

d to

gul

p do

wn

imm

ense

qua

ntiti

es o

f B

ourb

on a

s a

prel

imin

ary

ro a

"dr

unk

driv

ing

acci

dent

." T

he f

act

that

he

is a

hea

vy d

rink

er, o

f cou

rse,

mak

es it

feas

ible

tha

t he

shou

ld b

e ab

le

to f

rust

rate

his

pote

ntia

l m

urde

rers

by

esca

ping

his

"ac

cide

nt";

bur

we

are

also

lef

t to

ref

lect

on

the

appr

opri

aten

ess

of s

uch

a d

eath

-it

is pr

ecis

ely

the

way

in

whi

ch T

horn

hill

mig

ht e

vent

ually

hav

e di

ed. T

he

hair

-rai

sing

dri

ve in

a c

ar a

lmos

t out

of h

is co

ntro

l is

a lo

gica

l ext

ensi

on

of h

is ba

sic

situ

atio

n. A

nd H

itchc

ock

is so

littl

e in

tere

sted

in h

is sp

ies

as

NORT

H II

Y NO

RTH

WES

T 11

5

spie

s, th

e sp

ecta

tor

is so

litt

le e

ncou

rage

d ro

inq

uire

int

o th

e pr

ecise

na

ture

of

thei

r ac

tiviti

es,

that

it

beco

mes

ver

y ea

sy t

o ac

cept

the

m a

s si

mpl

y th

e em

bodi

men

t of r

he f

orce

s of

dis

orde

r an

d su

bver

sion

: w

e ar

e no

mor

e in

tere

sted

in th

eir r

atio

nal m

otiv

atio

n th

an w

e ar

e in

that

of t

he

bird

s tw

o fil

ms

late

r. Li

ke t

he b

irds

, the

y ar

e no

r so

muc

h a

proj

ectio

n of

rhe

chao

s un

derl

ying

mod

em o

rder

a·s

the

agen

ts w

here

by r

har

orde

r is

dest

roye

d, th

e ch

aos

forc

ed u

pon

the

char

acte

rs' c

onsc

ious

ness

. Th

ornh

ill's

sens

e of

pers

onal

iden

tity

is cl

early

wea

k, a

nd u

nder

min

ed

by th

e sp

ies'

unsh

akab

le c

onvi

ctio

n th

at h

e is

Geo

rge

Kap

lan;

and

inde

ed

as a

n in

tegr

ated

hum

an b

eing

he

has

abou

t as

rea

l an

exi

sten

ce. A

t th

e po

lice

stat

ion,

he

tells

his

mot

her o

n th

e ph

one,

ver

y em

phat

ical

ly, "

Thi

s is

your

son

, R

oger

Tho

rnhi

ll" -as if

he

h<td

been

bro

ught

to t

he p

oint

of

dou

btin

g it.

The

onl

y re

latio

nshi

p of

any

app

aren

t str

engt

h, w

ith h

is m

othe

r, pr

oves

wor

se t

han

usel

ess,

her

skep

ticis

m u

nder

min

ing

him

at

ever

y st

ep;

it is

paro

died

whe

n he

ret

urns

with

the

pol

ice

to t

he T

own-

send

man

sion

by

the

false

Mrs

. Tow

nsen

d's

effu

sive

, mot

herl

y, y

et e

qual

ly

cyni

cal,

trea

tmen

t of

him

. Th

e pa

ralle

l is

emph

asiz

ed b

y H

itchc

ock'

s ha

ving

the

tw

o w

omen

(w

ho l

ook

very

muc

h al

ike)

sta

nd i

n si

mila

r po

stur

es, h

ands

fol

ded

befo

re th

em. O

ne o

f the

film

's fu

nnie

st a

nd m

ost

unco

mfo

rtab

le m

omen

ts c

omes

whe

n, d

esce

ndin

g fr

om th

eir e

xplo

ratio

n of

Kap

lan'

s ro

oms

in t

he h

otel

lift,

Tho

rnhi

ll's

mot

her

rem

arks

gai

ly r

o rh

e tw

o m

en w

ho a

lmos

t sen

t her

son

ove

r a c

liff t

he n

ight

bef

ore,

"Y

ou

gent

lem

en a

ren'

t re

ally

try

ing

to k

ill m

y so

n, a

re y

ou?"

, an

d th

e w

hole

lif

t loa

d-m

othe

r, ki

llers

, oth

er p

asse

nger

s-la

ugh

upro

ario

usly

at

the

joke

whi

le T

horn

hill

stan

ds h

elpl

essl

y in

the

ir m

idst

. W

ith c

hara

cter

istic

Hitc

hcoc

kian

out

rage

ousn

ess,

Tho

rnhi

ll's

final

pl

unge

into

cha

os is

set

in t

he s

upre

me

sym

bol o

f pot

entia

l wor

ld o

rder

,.

the

Uni

ted

Nat

ions

bui

ldin

g. A

fter

the

knifi

ng o

f the

real

Tow

nsen

d, w

e se

e Th

ornh

ill r

unni

ng f

rant

ical

ly,

a m

icro

scop

ic f

igur

e, i

n a

shot

tak

en

from

the

top

of t

he b

uild

ing,

loo

king

dir

ectly

dow

n on

him

; th

e sm

ug,

self-

conf

iden

t .ad

verti

sing

man

, so

sure

of t

he e

ffect

iven

ess

of h

is pe

rson

-al

ity,

redu

ced

to a

n al

mos

t in

dist

ingu

isha

ble

spec

k, a

nd a

com

plet

ely

isol

ated

spe

ck,

for

he i

s no

w (

as T

horn

hill)

pur

sued

by

the

forc

es o

f or

der a

s w

ell

as d

isor

der

(as

Kap

lan)

. It i

s at

this

poi

nt th

at w

e le

ave

him

fo

r a

mom

ent t

o le

arn

the

trut

h: t

he m

eetin

g in

the

Int

ellig

ence

Bur

eau

reve

als

that

Kap

lan

(on

who

se w

here

abou

ts T

horn

hill'

s fa

re d

epen

ds)

does

n't

exis

t-is

a c

onve

nien

t in

vent

ion,

a "

none

xist

ent

deco

y "

de-

sign

ed t

o di

vert

the

spi

es' a

rten

tion

from

the

rea

l age

nt.

Wha

t is

to b

e

Page 5: e n a y r r › ... · The essential triviality of the James Bond in fact, sets off perfectly, by contrast, the depth, charm, integrity of Hitchcock ' s film. A film, whether light

114

HIT

CH

CO

CK

'S fi

i:H

S

done

to

prot

ect T

horn

hill?

Not

hing

. He

is to

be

left

to f

end

for

him

self,

th

row

n ba

ck o

n hi

s ow

n re

sour

ces,

all

civi

lized

pro

tect

ions

rem

oved

. T

he f

irst

mov

emen

t of

the

film

end

s w

ith t

he s

ecre

tary

's ep

itaph

on

an

unkn

own

none

ntity

: "G

ood-

bye,

Mr.

Tho

rnhi

ll, w

hoev

er y

ou a

re!"

T

he s

econ

d m

ovem

ent

begi

ns w

ith T

horn

hill,

in

the

stat

ion,

aga

in

amon

g cr

owds

, in

to w

hich

we

see

hlm

, in

lon

g sh

ot,

disa

ppea

r. Th

e en

suin

g se

quen

ce g

ives

us

the

trai

n jo

urne

y, T

horn

hill'

s m

eetin

g w

ith

Eve

Ken

dall,

and

the

firs

t sta

ge in

the

ir r

elat

ions

hip.

The

sup

erfic

ial

Eve

-it

is a

ll w

e se

e fo

r so

me

tim

e-su

gges

ts th

at sh

e is

the

perf

ect c

ount

er-

part

for T

horn

hill:

wor

ldly

, am

oral

, qui

te w

ithou

t. dep

th o

f fee

ling,

qui

te

unco

mm

itted

to a

nyth

ing

or a

nyon

e, ta

king

sex

as

she

wou

ld a

coc

ktai

l (s

he s

ays

to h

im, w

ith a

sly

sug

gest

iven

ess,

"It

's g

oing

to b

e a

long

nig

ht,

and

I do

n't

part

icul

arly

lik

e th

e bo

ok I

've

star

ted

...

know

wha

t I

mea

n?")

. The

re is

a s

light

hin

t of

nym

phom

ania

. She

see

ms

to b

e of

fer-

ing

exac

tly th

e ki

nd o

f rel

atio

nshi

p he

wou

ld w

ant:

love

-mak

ing

with

out

invo

lvem

ent,

sex

wit

hout

res

pons

ibili

ties.

But

alr

eady

, as

the

y be

gin

to

mak

e lo

ve a

fter

she

has

hid

den

him

in

her

wal

l'be

d fr

om t

he s

earc

hing

po

lice,

one

beg

ins

to b

e aw

are

of u

nder

curr

ents

. H

e w

onde

rs w

hy s

he

isn'

t afr

aid

of h

im, a

sup

pose

d m

urde

rer;

she

asks

him

if h

e is

plan

ing

co

mur

der

her.

He

asks

, "S

hall

I?";

she

mur

mur

s "P

leas

e do

," a

nd t

hey

kiss

. It

is al

l pl

ayfu

l on

the

sur

face

; bu

t as

the

y ki

ss h

is h

ands

enc

ircle

he

r he

ad a

s if

eith

er to

str

angl

e or

to c

rush

her

, and

her

s m

ove

to h

is c

o dr

aw h

im d

own,

in a

n at

titu

de o

f sur

rend

er. W

e re

aliz

e hi

s su

dden

sen

se

of t

he d

ange

r of

invo

lvem

ent

and

also

her

bar

ely

conc

eale

d w

eari

ness

an

d ye

arni

ng.

It is

all

done

with

a m

arve

lous

del

icac

y w

hich

is

in f

act

char

acte

rist

ic o

f Hitc

hcoc

k, a

lthou

gh th

is is

not

oft

en r

ecog

-ni

zed.

The

sce

ne e

nds

with

a s

hot o

f he

r lo

okin

g ov

er h

is s

houl

der,

her

ey

es d

eepl

y tr

oubl

ed;

then

she

sen

ds t

he m

essa

ge a

long

to

Van

dam

m:

"Wha

t do

I do

with

him

in t

he m

orni

ng?"

W

hat

she

does

is

to a

rran

ge f

or h

im t

o b

e m

achi

ne-g

unne

d fr

om a

pl

ane.

The

atte

mpt

on

his

life

is pr

efac

ed b

y th

eir

part

ing;

whi

ch e

nds

with

the

bea

utifu

l sh

ot o

f hi

s ha

nd t

enta

tivel

y co

veri

ng h

ers

on t

he

hand

le o

f he

r ca

se,

as s

he d

raw

s ba

ck:

thei

r m

utua

l in

volv

emen

t is

sugg

este

d w

ith r

emar

kabl

e ec

onom

y. W

hat

we

seem

to

hav

e he

re (

for

we

still

tak

e Ev

e ve

ry l

arge

ly a

t he

r fa

ce v

alue

) is

the

old

clic

he o

f th

e w

icke

d w

oman

dra

wn

into

true

love

aga

inst

her

will

. A c

urso

ry c

ompa

r-is

on w

ith w

hat

Guy

Ham

ilto

n m

akes

of

the

Puss

y G

alor

e/ja

mes

Bon

d

HO

IITH

IIY

HO

IITH

WE

ST

ll7

rela

tions

hip

will

rev

eal

the

exte

nt t

o w

hich

a "

light

ca

n ha

ve g

race

, sen

sibi

liry,

and

mor

al d

epth

if it

is d

irec

ted

by H

itchc

ock.

T

he c

rop-

dust

ing

sequ

ence

is j

ustly

fam

ous

and

seem

s w

idel

y ac

cept

ed

as o

ne o

f H

itchc

ock'

s m

ost

brill

iant

set

pie

ces.

Wha

t is

nor

so o

ften

no

ticed

, how

ever

, is

its d

epen

denc

e fo

r of

it's

effe

ct o

n irs

con

text

. C

erta

inly

, it i

s br

illia

nt in

itse

lf, a

n ob

ject

less

on in

the

bui

ldin

g up

of

a su

spen

se t

hrou

gh t

he r

epea

ted

chea

ting

of t

he a

udie

nce'

s ex

pect

atio

ns,

endi

ng in

the

fri

sson

-pro

duci

ng l

ine,

"T

hat

plan

e's

dust

ing

crop

s w

here

th

ere

ain'

t no

cro

ps,"

and

the

subs

eque

nt e

xplo

sion

int

o vi

olen

t act

ion.

Y

et th

e se

quen

ce r

etai

ns ir

s m

agic

how

ever

man

y tim

es o

ne s

ee's

the

film

-

even

aft

er o

ne k

now

s, s

hot b

y sh

ot, w

hat c

omes

nex

t, an

d it

is w

orth

as

king

why

this

sho

uld

be. T

he s

eque

nce

occu

rs a

t al

mos

t exa

ctly

mid

-po

int

in t

he f

ilm.·

Imm

edia

tely

beh

ind

it is

our

know

ledg

e of

Eve

. Ken

-da

ll's

trea

cher

y (w

e kn

ow T

horn

hill

is go

ing

to b

e at

tack

ed, t

houg

h he

do

esn'

t) an

d al

l th

e em

otio

nal

tens

ion

gene

rate

d by

the

ir r

elat

ions

hip.

Bu

r the

re is

muc

h m

ore

behi

nd it

than

tha

t. H

ithe

rto

in th

e fil

m, T

horn

-hi

ll ha

s al

way

s be

en i

nsid

e: i

nsid

e ci

ties,

build

ings

, ve

hicl

es:

and

we

know

him

as

a m

an a

t hom

e in

the

com

plac

ency

-enc

oura

ging

secu

riry

of

offic

e an

d co

ckta

il ba

r. N

ow, s

udde

nly,

he

is in

ope

n co

untr

y. A

nd n

ot

mer

ely

open

cou

ntry

: a

flat

land

scap

e, t

reel

ess,

hou

sele

ss,

shel

terle

ss,

parc

hed,

str

etch

ing

away

app

aren

tly to

infin

iry o

n al

l sid

es. I

n th

e m

idst

of

this

he

stan

ds, a

n is

olat

ed s

peck

with

the

who

le w

orld

aga

inst

him

, ab

solu

tely

exp

osed

and

vul

nera

ble:

mod

ern

man

dep

rive

d of

all

his

amen

ities

and

arti

ficia

l re

sour

ces.

The

bus

-hi

s la

st c

onta

ct w

ith

othe

r pe

ople

, with

civ

iliza

tion-

mov

es a

way

, the

cro

p-du

stin

g pl

ane

rurn

s an

d fli

es t

owar

d hi

m .

.. It

is a

mar

velo

us c

once

ptio

n, c

entr

al t

o th

e fil

m i

n m

ore

way

s th

an p

ositi

on.

Thor

nhill

's fir

st i

mag

e of

Eve

is n

ow s

hatte

red;

the

sec

ond

is eq

ually

m

isle

adin

g-th

ough

bot

h be

ar s

ome

rela

tions

hip

to t

he r

eal

Eve.

Whe

n th

ey m

eet a

gain

in t

he h

otel

, she

run

s up

to

him

, and

we

see

her

relie

f:

relie

f not

onl

y th

at h

e is

n't d

ead

bur t

hat s

he h

asn'

t bee

n re

spon

sibl

e fo

r hi

s de

ath.

His

han

ds g

o ro

und

her

head

aga

in t

o em

brac

e· he

r, in

the

ge

srur

e he

use

d on

the

tra

in; o

nly

this

tim

e th

ey d

on't

quite

cou

ch. H

e he

sita

tes,

mov

es a

way

, mak

es a

sar

cast

ic r

emar

k ab

out

"tog

ethe

rnes

s."

Ano

ther

fam

iliar

.Hitc

hcoc

k th

eme

is to

uche

d on

: the

nec

essi

ry f

or a

tru

st

base

d on

inst

inct

, eve

n w

hen

it is

quite

unr

easo

nabl

e. T

heir

sep

arat

ion

is ex

pres

sed

by re

stle

ss c

ross

cutti

ng, t

heir

par

tial

rec

onci

liatio

n (o

n hi

s si

de

Page 6: e n a y r r › ... · The essential triviality of the James Bond in fact, sets off perfectly, by contrast, the depth, charm, integrity of Hitchcock ' s film. A film, whether light

us

HIT

CH

CO

CK

'S F

ILM

S

clea

rly p

rovi

sion

al a

nd s

uspi

ciou

s) b

y a

beau

tiful

cam

era

mov

emen

t tha

t un

ites

them

in

one

imag

e as

she

mov

es t

owar

d hi

m.

She

help

s hi

m

rem

ove

his

jack

et to

hav

e it

clea

ned,

and

he

says

, "W

hen

I was

a l

ittle

bo

y I w

ould

n't e

ven

let m

y m

othe

r und

ress

me"

; she

tells

him

he

is a

big

boy

now

. It

is on

e of

thos

e un

obtru

sive

, alm

ost o

ffha

nd e

xcha

nges

that

re

veal

s a

grea

t dea

l. B

efor

e sh

e le

aves

, he

asks

her

, "H

ave

you

ever

kill

ed

anyo

ne?"

-we a

re m

ade

to r

emem

ber

that

(wha

teve

r he

r m

otiv

es)

she

did

in fa

ct c

onni

ve a

t the

atte

mpt

on

his

life.

This

mid

dle

mov

emen

t of

the

film

clo

ses

with

the

auc

tion

scen

e w

hich

giv

es u

s Th

ornh

ill's

view

of E

ve a

t its

mos

t bi

tterly

dis

illus

ione

d eb

b. V

anda

mm

is s

tand

ing

behi

nd h

er, h

is ha

nd c

losi

ng

the

back

of

her

nec

k in

wha

t con

stitu

tes

at o

nce

a ca

ress

and

a th

reat

. A c

lose

-up

emph

asiz

es th

is, a

nd w

e co

nnec

t it w

ith T

horn

hill'

s em

brac

es, b

ut th

is is

fa

r m

ore

sini

ster

, an

d ex

pres

ses

the

prec

ario

usne

ss o

f Ev

e's

posi

tion

(bef

ore

we

know

the

trut

h ab

out h

er).

Tho

rnhi

ll ca

lls h

er a

"st

arue

" an

d te

lls h

er: "

Who

are

you

kid

ding

? Y

ou h

ave

no fe

elin

gs t

o hu

rt."

We

see,

but h

e do

esn'

t, th

at sh

e is

in te

ars:

the

seq

uenc

e is

a co

nden

sed

reca

pitu

-la

tion

of N

otor

ious

. Th

is is

not

so

bana

l as

it so

unds

. We

are

awar

e by

th

is t

ime

of t

he p

oten

tially

hea

ling

pow

er o

f th

e re

latio

nshi

p on

bot

h si

des

(thou

gh w

e sti

ll do

n't

know

the

rea

l na

ture

of

Eve's

nee

d);

but

it ap

pear

s-as

Tho

rnhi

ll es

cape

s, th

anks

to th

e po

lice-

irre

med

iabl

y br

oken

. Th

e fin

al m

ovem

ent o

pens

with

the

reve

rsal

of

this

situ

atio

n. A

t th

e ai

rpor

t, th

e he

ad o

f th

e C

.I.A

. te

lls T

horn

hill

the

trut

h ab

out E

ve

and

he a

ccep

ts h

is ro

le a

s K

apla

n fo

r her

sake

. Im

med

iate

ly b

efor

e, h

e a

phra

se th

at u

nite

s hi

s tw

o im

ages

of h

er: "

Tha

t tre

ache

rous

littl

e i:r

amp.

" Su

dden

ly h

e le

arns

tha

t her

life

may

dep

end

on h

im, a

nd, i

n ag

reei

ng to

be

Kap

lan,

he

is ac

cept

ing

his

resp

onsi

bilit

y an

d hi

s in

volv

emen

t in

a

deep

rel

atio

nshi

p. T

he s

exua

l ba

sis

of h

is pr

evio

us r

efus

al o

f co

mm

it·

men

t, re

ject

ion

of re

spon

sibi

liry,

is c

lear

: he

has

surv

ived

two

mar

riage

s w

hich

hav

e le

ft hi

m, a

ppar

ently

, com

plet

ely

unaf

fect

ed.

As h

e ac

cept

s, hi

s fa

ce is

sud

denl

y ill

umin

ated

by

the

light

of t

he p

lane

; and

we

cut t

o th

e fir

st s

hot

of M

ount

Rus

hmor

e. T

he c

ut h

as g

reat

em

otio

nal

effe

ct,

beca

use

it ab

rupt

ly d

efin

es f

or u

s, w

ith m

arve

lous

eco

nom

y, t

he e

volu

-tio

n of

the

hero

. For

if th

e si

gnifi

canc

e of

Mou

nt R

ushm

ore

is dr

amat

ic

rath

er t

han

sym

bolic

, it

is be

caus

e "s

ymbo

lic"

sugg

ests

som

ethi

ng t

oo

prec

ise

and

too

sim

ple.

It i

s no

t a s

ymbo

l of d

emoc

racy

sta

ndin

g ag

ains

t th

e w

icke

d ag

ents

; bu

t ce

rtain

ly, i

n its

em

otio

nal e

ffect

it s

ugge

sts

the

orde

r an

d st

abili

ry to

war

d w

hich

Tho

rnhi

ll is

prog

ress

ing,

and

to w

hich

NO

RT

H II

Y N

OR

TH

WE

ST

ll9

the

acce

ptan

ce o

f a

stro

ng r

elat

ions

hip

with

its

acco

mpa

nyin

g re

spon

si-bi

litie

s is

the

esse

ntia

l ste

p.[:

u]

The

scen

e of

his

rec

onci

liatio

n w

ith E

ve (

afte

r th

e fa

lse s

hoot

ing)

is

perh

aps

the

mos

t be

autif

ul i

n th

e fil

m.

Firs

t, th

e lo

catio

n: f

or t

he f

irst

rime

in t

fie fi

lm w

e ar

e am

ong

trees

, coo

l cal

m s

unlig

ht a

nd s

had

e-th

e ef

fect

is m

ore

a m

atte

r of

con

text

tha

n ot

the

intr

insi

c be

aury

of

the

scen

ery,

and

(as

usua

l in

this

film

, in

deed

in a

ll H

itchc

ock'

s w

ork)

mor

e of

ove

rtone

s an

d as

soci

atio

ns th

an o

f ove

rt, c

lear

-cut

sym

bolis

m; i

t is

an

apt s

ettin

g fo

r th

e be

ginn

ing

of n

ew li

fe. S

econ

d, t

he m

ise-e

n-sc

ene.

As

rhe

"dea

d" T

horn

hili

gets

out o

f the

bac

k of

the

car,

the

cam

era

trac

ks

back

to re

veal

Eve

sta

ndin

g by

her

car

to th

e rig

ht. W

e se

e th

em in

lon

g sh

ot g

azin

g at

eac

h ot

her

from

the

ext

rem

ities

of

the

scre

en, a

cros

s th

e sp

ace

of tr

ees

and

filte

red

sunl

ight

, eve

ryth

ing

still,

the

tw

o he

sita

nt,

as

if sh

y of

each

oth

er. T

hen

a sh

ot o

f Tho

rnhi

ll as

he

begi

ns to

mov

e: t

he

cam

era

track

s w

ith h

im, l

eft t

o rig

ht.

Cut

to a

sho

t of E

ve a

s sh

e st

arts

fo

rwar

d: t

he c

amer

a tra

cks

with

her

fro

m r

ight

to le

ft. A

nd s

o th

ey a

re

unite

d: H

itchc

ock

beau

tiful

ly in

volv

es t

he s

pect

ator

in t

heir

mov

emen

t to

war

d ea

ch o

ther

, the

ir m

ovem

ent t

owar

d th

e "t

oget

hern

ess"

tha

t was

ea

rlier

(for

Tho

rnhi

ll) a

con

tem

ptuo

us sn

eer.

We,

and

Tho

rnhi

ll, s

ee a

t la

st th

e re

al E

ve; o

r pe

rhap

s it

is tr

uer

to

say

that

the

real

Eve

now

em

erge

s: h

er t

rue

iden

tiry

is cr

eate

d-o

r at

le

ast c

ryst

alliz

ed-b

y th

e re

latio

nshi

p, s

uper

cedi

ng (o

r pe

rhap

s as

sim

i-la

ting)

her

tw

o ea

rlier

per

sona

e. B

ut i

t is

mad

e cl

ear

that

tho

se e

arlie

r Ev

es,

part

ly a

rtific

ial,

are

wha

t she

cou

ld h

ave

beco

me,

jus

t as

the

real

Ju

dy B

arto

n co

ntai

ns e

lem

ents

of

her

two

adop

ted

"per

sona

litie

s" (

in

Vert

igo

the

dist

inct

ion

betw

een

them

is o

f cou

rse

muc

h gr

eate

r). I

t is

the

real

Eve

who

tells

Tho

rnhi

ll, w

ith a

tou

chin

g ge

ntle

ness

, how

dee

ply

his

wor

ds h

urt;

but a

lmos

t at o

nce,

we

get a

glim

pse

of th

e fir

st Ev

e, th

e Ev

e of

the

tra

in j

ourn

ey,

in h

er d

escr

iptio

n of

her

rel

atio

nshi

p w

ith V

an-

dam

m:

"I h

ad n

othi

ng to

do

that

wee

kend

, so

I dec

ided

to

fall

in lo

ve."

Th

en h

er c

omm

ent

on h

er d

ecis

ion

to h

elp

Inte

llige

nce

("M

aybe

tha

t w

as t

he f

irst

time

anyo

ne e

ver

aske

d m

e to

do

anyt

hing

wor

thw

hile

")

give

s us

the

pot

entia

lly r

uthl

ess

Eve-

ruth

less

in

a go

od c

ause

-wh

o co

uld

send

Tho

rnhi

ll (w

ith w

hate

ver

qual

ms)

to

his

deat

h an

d w

ho is

sti

ll re

ady

to s

acrif

ice

thei

r. rel

atio

nshi

p fo

r th

e "c

ause

."

stra

nds

are

draw

n to

geth

er in

the

ens

uing

dia

logu

e ex

chan

ge:

"Has

life

bee

n lik

e th

at?"

he

asks

her

, and

she

asse

nts.

"How

com

e?"-

"Men

like

you

!"-

"Wha

t's w

rong

with

men

like

me?"-

"The

y do

n't b

elie

ve in

mar

riag

e."

Page 7: e n a y r r › ... · The essential triviality of the James Bond in fact, sets off perfectly, by contrast, the depth, charm, integrity of Hitchcock ' s film. A film, whether light

HIT

CH

CO

CK

'S F

ILM

S

He

tells

her

he'

s be

en m

arri

ed tw

ice:

her

com

men

t, "S

ee w

hat I

mea

n?"

Circ

umst

ance

s ha

ve s

teer

ed h

er to

war

d be

ing

one

or o

ther

of t

he e

arlie

r Ev

es;

now

, in

the

rel

atio

nshi

p w

ith T

horn

hill,

her

tru

e se

lf ca

n be

re

aliz

ed.

She

mak

es i

t cle

ar t

hat t

his

mar

riag

e is

one,

at

last

, th

at h

e w

ill n

ot

easi

ly e

scap

e. H

is re

actio

n is

jocu

lar,

cyni

cal-

"I m

ay g

o ba

ck to

hat

ing

you:

it w

as m

ore

fun.

" H

is e

xpre

ssio

n an

d to

ne b

elie

the

wor

ds, b

ut th

ey

serv

e to

bri

ng b

efor

e us

the

man

's p

revi

ous

fear

of r

eal

invo

lvem

ent,

of

resp

onsi

bilit

y. H

itch

cock

-her

e an

d in

Rea

r Win

dow

-giv

es u

s no

sim

-pl

e "r

edem

ptio

n th

roug

h lo

ve,"

no

abru

pt tr

ansf

orm

atio

n; ju

st a

del

icat

e in

timat

ion

of t

he p

oten

tial

heal

ing

pow

er. o

f a

bala

nced

, pe

rman

em

rela

tions

hip.

Eve

rem

inds

him

that

he

"is

mea

nt to

be

criti

cally

wou

nded

" he

repl

ies,

"I

neve

r fel

t mor

e al

ive.

" T

hat

char

min

g fa

ther

fig

ure,

the

hea

d of

the

C.I.

A.,

who

m J

ean

Dou

chet

app

ears

to s

ugge

st is

som

e ki

nd o

f Div

ine

Inst

rum

ent,

seem

s ro

m

e ro

com

e ou

t of t

hing

s pr

etty

bad

ly. T

he fi

lm is

sur

ely

solid

ly b

ehin

d Th

ornh

ill i

n re

ject

ing

the

use

of a

wom

an t

o "g

et p

eopl

e lik

e V

an-

dam

m":

pro

stitu

tion,

in

how

ever

adm

irab

le a

cau

se,

rem

ains

pro

stitu

-tio

n. M

ixed

mor

alit

y-th

e pu

rsui

ng o

f a

good

end

by

conv

entio

nally

im

mor

al m

eans

like

Mar

k R

utla

nd's

in M

arni

e-is

jus

tifie

d by

Hitc

h-co

ck o

nly

as t

he o

utco

me

of p

ower

ful

inst

inct

ive

driv

es,

of b

asic

ally

ri g

ht f

eelin

gs,

nor

whe

n it

com

es t

o co

ld c

alcu

latio

n: j

ustif

iabl

e, t

here

· fo

re,

only

on

the

pers

onal

lev

el,

not

on t

he p

oliti

cal.

We

are

entir

ely

behi

nd T

horn

hill,

the

n, i

n hi

s ar

rem

prs

to e

xtri

cate

Eve

-in

the

dete

r-m

ined

pos

itive

act

ion

that

res

ults

fro

m h

is ac

cept

ance

of

pers

onal

re-

spon

sibi

lity.

B

efor

e th

e M

ount

Rus

hmor

e cl

imax

, we

have

Tho

rnhi

ll's

atte

mpt

s ro

re

scue

Eve

fro

m V

anda

mm

's h

ouse

, V

anda

mm

's d

isco

very

of

her

true

na

ture

, and

his

plan

s to

dis

pose

of h

er o

ver

the

sea.

Leo

nard

is b

uilt

up

here

as

the

inca

rnat

ion

of d

estr

uctio

n an

d ne

gatio

n. H

is m

otiv

e is

sexu

al

jeal

ousy

-jea

lous

y of

Eve

, his

riv

al fo

r Van

dam

m. H

e di

sclo

ses

the

trut

h ab

out E

ve i

n a

mel

odra

mat

ic, v

indi

ctiv

e w

ay, b

y "s

hoot

ing"

Van

dam

m

with

her

bla

nk-l

oade

d re

volv

er.

The

clim

ax is

pla

yed

our o

n an

d ar

ound

the

impe

rtur

babl

e st

one

face

s of

the

Pres

iden

ts,

with

the

ir su

gges

tion

of s

tabi

lity

and

orde

r fo

rmin

g a

back

grou

nd ro

Tho

rnhi

ll's

desp

erat

e st

rugg

le to

save

him

self

and

Eve

for

life.

As

they

dan

gle

from

a le

dge

by th

eir h

ands

, the

y di

scus

s-w

ith

tota

l ab

surd

ity o

n a

natu

ralis

tic l

evel

-Tho

rnhi

ll's

first

two

mar

riage

s: "

My

NORT

H B

Y NO

RTH

WES

T 14

1

wiv

es d

ivor

ced

me

...

I thi

nk th

ey sa

id I

led

roo

dull

a lif

e."

The

stru

ggle

fo

r life

aga

inst

the

dest

ruct

ive

elem

ents

(th

e sp

ies)

is t

hus

com

bine

d w

ith

the

cem

entin

g of

the

rela

tions

hip,

the

seal

ing

off o

f the

pas

t. T

he jo

inin

g of

the

love

rs' h

ands

der

ives

som

e of

its

emot

iona

l and

mor

al f

orce

fro

m

our

view

it

as r

he c

limax

of

a se

quen

ce o

f sh

ots

of t

heir

han

ds

touc

hing

(to

mar

k ph

ases

in

the

rela

tions

hip)

ear

lier:

her

sens

uous

ca-

ress

ing

of h

is ha

nd o

ver t

he lu

nch

tabl

e on

tr

ain,

whe

n sh

e lo

oked

at

his

"R.

0.

T."

boo

kmat

ches

; hi

s pr

essu

re o

n he

r ha

nd a

t th

e C

hica

go

stat

ion

as t

hey

say

good

-bye

, aft

er s

he h

as a

rran

ged

the

"mee

ting"

with

K

apla

n. E

vent

ually

, Tho

rnhi

ll is

hang

ing

by o

ne h

and,

hol

ding

the

dan-

glin

g Ev

e by

the

oth

er, a

gre

at a

byss

ben

eath

them

: fin

al t

est o

f sta

min

a,

with

eve

ryth

ing

stak

ed o

n hi

s po

wer

s of

end

uran

ce a

nd d

eter

min

atio

n.

Leon

ard

stan

ds a

bove

them

; Tho

rnhi

ll's

"Hel

p! H

elp

me!

" is

give

n gr

eat

forc

e. T

hen

Leon

ard

trea

ds o

n Th

ornh

ill's

hand

. Tho

rnhi

ll su

rviv

es t

he

trial

for

lon

g en

ough

: Le

onar

d is

shot

dow

n. W

e se

e Th

ornh

ill p

ullin

g Ev

e to

saf

ety.

An

abru

pt c

ut, b

ut w

ith o

verl

appi

ng d

ialo

gue,

mak

es t

he

actio

n cu

lmin

ate

in h

is pu

lling

her

up

into

bed

on

a tr

ain,

as

"Mrs

. Th

ornh

ill" -

a b

eaut

iful w

ay o

f exp

ress

ing

the

link

betw

een

his

surv

ival

of

the

orde

al a

nd th

eir r

elat

ions

hip.

The

last

sho

t is

of a

trai

n en

teri

ng a

tu

nnel

: the

"ph

allic

sym

bol"

tow

ard

whi

ch t

he w

hole

film

has

mov

ed.

lr w

ill b

e ob

ject

ed t

hat t

his

acco

unt o

f N

orth

by

Nor

thw

est m

akes

it

far

roo

seri

ous.

But

its

char

ms,

its

def

tnes

s, t

he c

onst

ant f

low

of

inve

n-tio

n, it

s hu

mor

and

exh

ilara

tion,

are

ther

e fo

r al

l to

see.

All

I hav

e tr

ied

ro d

o is

adju

st rh

e ba

lanc

e: n

ot to

turn

a l

ight

com

edy

into

an

unsm

iling

m

oral

ity p

lay,

but

to

sugg

est w

hy N

orth

by

Nor

thw

est

is su

ch a

ver

y,

very

goo

d lig

ht c

omed

y.