e3 – stellar distances

56
E3 – Stellar distances

Upload: abena

Post on 06-Feb-2016

62 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

E3 – Stellar distances. Parallax. Parallax. Parallax angle. Parallax angle. Tan p. P (in rads). R (=1 AU). d. tan p = R/d for small p, tan p ≈ p so d = R/p. Parsec. If the parallax angle is one arcsecond (1 “) the distance to the star is called a parsec. Parsec. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: E3 – Stellar distances

E3 – Stellar distances

Page 2: E3 – Stellar distances

Parallax

Page 3: E3 – Stellar distances
Page 4: E3 – Stellar distances

Parallax

Page 5: E3 – Stellar distances

Parallax angle

Page 6: E3 – Stellar distances
Page 7: E3 – Stellar distances

Parallax angle

» Tan p

R (=1 AU)

d

P (in rads)

tan p = R/d

for small p, tan p ≈ p

so d = R/p

Page 8: E3 – Stellar distances

Parsec

• If the parallax angle is one arcsecond (1 “) the distance to the star is called a parsec

Page 9: E3 – Stellar distances

Parsec

• If the parallax angle is one arcsecond (1 “) the distance to the star is called a parsec

• d (parsecs) = 1p (in arcsecs)

Page 10: E3 – Stellar distances

Parsec

• 1 pc = 3.26 ly

Page 11: E3 – Stellar distances

Example

• A star has a parallax angle of 0.34 arcsecs. How far is the star away from earth in light years?d (parsecs) = 1 = 1 = 2.9pc

p (in arcsecs) 0.34

Distance in light years = 2.9 x 3.26 = 9.5 ly

Page 12: E3 – Stellar distances

Converting degrees to arcsecs in radians

• Multiply by 2π to convert to radians360

• Multiply by 1 to convert to arcsecs3600

Page 13: E3 – Stellar distances

Parallax method

• Only useful for close stars (up to 300 ly (100 pc) as further than that the parallax angle is too small (space based telescopes can use this method to measure stars up to distances of 500 pc).

Page 14: E3 – Stellar distances

‘Parallax angle and parsec worksheet’

Let’s try some questions!

Page 15: E3 – Stellar distances

Apparent and absolute magnitudes

Page 16: E3 – Stellar distances

Hipparchus

• Greek astronomer

• Lived 2000 years ago

Page 17: E3 – Stellar distances

Hipparchus compared the relative

brightness of stars (as seen from earth)

Brightest star – magnitude 1 Faintest star – magnitude 6

Page 18: E3 – Stellar distances

Apparent magnitude and brightness

Magnitude 1 star is 100 times brighter than

a magnitude 6 star

Page 19: E3 – Stellar distances

• The difference The difference between a magnitude between a magnitude 1 star and a magnitude 1 star and a magnitude 6 star is ‘5 steps’ on 6 star is ‘5 steps’ on the magnitude scale the magnitude scale and the scale is and the scale is logarithmic. This logarithmic. This means that each ‘step’ means that each ‘step’ equated to a equated to a brightness decrease of brightness decrease of 2.5122.512 since since

• (2.512(2.512)5=)5=100 100

Page 20: E3 – Stellar distances

Magnitude 1

Magnitude 2

Magnitude 3

Magnitude 4

Magnitude 5

Magnitude 6

r5 = 100

r = 2.512

Page 21: E3 – Stellar distances

* Under what conditions?

• Clear sky

• When viewed from earth

• As visible to the naked eye

Page 22: E3 – Stellar distances

Can a star have a magnitude greater than 6?

Page 23: E3 – Stellar distances

Can a star have a magnitude greater than 6?

Yes, but these stars are only visible through a telescope

Page 24: E3 – Stellar distances

A star of apparent magnitude less than 1

Page 25: E3 – Stellar distances

Negative apparent magnitude?

They are very bright!!

Page 26: E3 – Stellar distances

Guess the apparent magnitude of Sun

It is -26.7

Page 27: E3 – Stellar distances

Apparent magnitude

The apparent magnitude m, of a star of apparent brightness b is defined by

m = -(5/2)log (b/b0)

where b0 is taken as a reference value of 2.52 x 10-8 W.m-2

This can also be written as b/b0 = 2.512-m

Page 28: E3 – Stellar distances

Question Apparent magnitude of Sun is -26.7 and that of

Betelgeuse is 0.5. How much brighter is Sun than Betelgeuse?

Page 29: E3 – Stellar distances

Apparent magnitude of Sun is -26.7 and that of Betelgeuse is 0.5. How much brighter is Sun than

Betelgeuse?

• Difference in magnitudes is 0.5 - -26.7 = 27.2• Each difference in magnitude is a difference of

2.512 in brightness ((2.512(2.512)5=)5=100 )100 )• Therefore the difference in brightness = Therefore the difference in brightness =

2.5122.51227.227.2

• = 7.6 x 1010

Page 30: E3 – Stellar distances

Sun is 76 billion times brighter than Betelgeuse

Page 31: E3 – Stellar distances

Question 2

Apparent magnitudes of Andromeda galaxy and Crab nebula are 4.8 and 8.4 respectively.

a) Which of these is brightest?

b) By what factor?

Page 32: E3 – Stellar distances

Galaxy is brighter

Difference in apparent magnitudes = 8.4 – 4.8 = 3.6Difference in brightness therefore = 2.5123.6 = 27.5 times

Page 33: E3 – Stellar distances

The Andomeda Galaxy is a vast collection

of stars

• The Crab Nebulae is a debris of supernova and is the birth place of the new star.

Page 34: E3 – Stellar distances

Apparent magnitude

- Is it a fair way of measuring brightness of a star?

- Brightness depends on distance and obeys inverse square law

Page 35: E3 – Stellar distances

Absolute magnitude

is the apparent

magnitude of a star

when viewed from

a distance of 10 pc.

Page 36: E3 – Stellar distances

Absolute magnitude

Page 37: E3 – Stellar distances

Absolute magnitude M and apparent magnitude m

m – M = 5 log (d/10)

d is in parsecs!

Page 38: E3 – Stellar distances

Question

Calculate the absolute magnitude of Sun.

Apparent magnitude = -26.7

Distance from earth = 4.9 x 10-6 pc

Page 39: E3 – Stellar distances

m – M = 5 log(d/10)

-26.7- M = 5 log (4.9 x 10-6/10)

M =-26.7 – 5log(4.9 x 10-7)M = 4.85

Page 40: E3 – Stellar distances

M = 4.85

• This means at a standard distance of 10 parsecs the sun would appear to be a dim star.

Page 41: E3 – Stellar distances

Can absolute magnitude be

Positive ?

Negative ?

Any value?

Page 42: E3 – Stellar distances

Let’s try some questions!

‘Apparent and absolute magnitude questions’

Page 43: E3 – Stellar distances

Spectroscopic parallax

Page 44: E3 – Stellar distances

Spectroscopic parallax

• This refers to the method of finding the distance to a star given the star’s luminosity and apparent brightness. It doesn’t use parallax! Limited to distances less than 10 Mpc

• We know that b = L/(4πd2) so d = (L/(4 πb))½

Page 45: E3 – Stellar distances

Spectroscopic parallax - Example

• A main sequence star emits most of its energy at λ = 2.4 x 10-7 m. Its apparent brightness is measured to be 4.3 x 10-9 W.m-2. How far away is the star?

• λ 0T = 2.9 x 10-3 Km

• T = 2.9 x 10-3 / 4.3 x 10-9 = 12000K

Page 46: E3 – Stellar distances

• T = 12000K. From an HR diagram we can see this corresponds to a brightness of about 100x that of the sun (= 100 x 3.9 x 1026 = 3.9 x 1028 W)

Page 47: E3 – Stellar distances

Spectroscopic parallax - Example

Thus d = (L/(4 πb))½

d = (3.9 x 1028/(4 x π x 4.3 x 10-9))½

d = 8.5 x 1017 m = 90 ly = 28 pc

Page 48: E3 – Stellar distances

Using cepheids to measure distance

Page 49: E3 – Stellar distances

• At distances greater than Mpc, neither parallax nor At distances greater than Mpc, neither parallax nor spectroscopic parallax can be relied upon to measure spectroscopic parallax can be relied upon to measure the distance to a star. the distance to a star.

• When we observe another galaxy, all of the stars in When we observe another galaxy, all of the stars in that galaxy are approximately the same distance that galaxy are approximately the same distance away from the earth. What we really need is a light away from the earth. What we really need is a light source of known luminosity in the galaxy. If we had source of known luminosity in the galaxy. If we had this then we could make comparisons with the other this then we could make comparisons with the other stars and judge their luminosities. In other words we stars and judge their luminosities. In other words we need a ‘standard candle’ –that is a star of known need a ‘standard candle’ –that is a star of known luminosity.luminosity.

• The outer layers of Cepheid variable stars undergo The outer layers of Cepheid variable stars undergo periodic expansion and contraction, producing a periodic expansion and contraction, producing a periodic variation in its luminosity.periodic variation in its luminosity.

Cepheid variables

Page 50: E3 – Stellar distances

Cepheid variable Cepheid variable stars are useful to stars are useful to astronomers because of the astronomers because of the periodperiod of their of their variation in luminosity turns out to be related variation in luminosity turns out to be related to the average to the average absolute magnitude absolute magnitude of the of the Cepheid. Thus the luminosity of the Cepheid Cepheid. Thus the luminosity of the Cepheid can be calculated by observing the variation in can be calculated by observing the variation in brightness. brightness.

Page 51: E3 – Stellar distances

The process of estimating the distance to a galaxy (in which the The process of estimating the distance to a galaxy (in which the individual stars can be imagined) might be as follows:individual stars can be imagined) might be as follows:

• Locate a Cepheid variable in the galaxyLocate a Cepheid variable in the galaxy• Measure the variation in brightness over a given period of Measure the variation in brightness over a given period of

time.time.• Use the luminosity-period relationship for Cepheids to Use the luminosity-period relationship for Cepheids to

estimate the average luminosity.estimate the average luminosity.• Use the average luminosity, the average brightness and the Use the average luminosity, the average brightness and the

inverse square law to estimate the distance to the star.inverse square law to estimate the distance to the star.

Page 52: E3 – Stellar distances

Cepheid calculation - Example

Page 53: E3 – Stellar distances

• From the left-hand graph we can see that the period of the cepheid is 5.4 days. From the second graph we can see that this corresponds to a luminosity of about 103 suns (3.9 x 1029 W).

Page 54: E3 – Stellar distances

• From the left hand graph we can see the peak apparent magnitude is 3.6 which means we can find the apparent brightness from

• b/b0 = 2.512-m

• b = 2.52 x 10-8 x 2.512-3.6 = 9.15 x 10-10 W.m-2

Page 55: E3 – Stellar distances

• Now using the relationship between apparent brightness, luminosity and distance

• d = (L/(4πb))½ • d = (3.9 x 1029/(4 x π x 9.15 x 10-10))½

• d = 5.8 x 1018 m = 615 ly = 189 pc

Page 56: E3 – Stellar distances

Question

Page 513 Question 16.