echo canyon design brief
DESCRIPTION
This design brief outlines the process taken by Stewart Christensen and Samantha Fuller in designing a campground and public space for the Echo Canyon recreational area.TRANSCRIPT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Echo Canyon is located about 12 miles east of Pioche on State Route 323. The park is looking to
improve their campgrounds, and plan for future overall park improvements.
These improvements include:
• 24 site campground• power, water and septic at all sites• a restroom and shower complex• pave existing roads and additional paved roads• hiking, walking and biking trails• wildlife viewing areas• landscaping with irrigation• boat dock and habitat structures in the reservoir• re-vegetation of 200 acres and enhancement of the stream and areas around the reservoir• potential small cabins for rent
The increasing numbers of campers and day use visitors has made this addition necessary. There have been calls for additional trails and viewing areas, as well as camping facilities, from both long term and short term visitors making use of the park. Local residents as well as visitors from outside the County take advantage of the facilities offered – camping, picnicking, hiking, etc. This project will enhance the long term viability and opportunities for recreational enthusiasts at Echo Canyon Park.
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
ECHO CANYONS t a t e P a r k
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goal 1: Allow users of the park to have seamless accessibility from the access roads to the trails while
enhancing the natural beauty of the park and allowing the users to experience the park with ease.
Objective 1: Provided native revegetation along all access corridors that enhances the natural
beauty of the sites
Objective 2: Create and update trails throughout the park allowing a spectrum of users, from ADA
accessible trails to advanced hiking trails
Objective 3: Create signage and way-finding features throughout the park
Goal 2: Create opportunities for safe and fun recreation areas that protect the wildlife and allow for
educational happenings to occur.
Objective 1: Create an area where boats can be docked with easy access to the main road
Objective 2: Create a reservoir loop trail that has fishing and educational outcroppings that
connect seamlessly to trails and campgrounds
Objective 3: Provide areas for families to have passive recreation opportunities near the reservoir
that are safe for children
Goal 3: Improve all campground and group picnic areas to accommodate all types of users of the park.
Objective 1: Create campgrounds that hold 20 or more sites with a restroom complex, grilling
stations, picnic tables and shade
Objective 2: Allow all picnic and group areas to connect to different types of trails and have access
to the reservoir.
Objective 3: Create campgrounds that will accommodated many different uses and group sizes.
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
ECHO CANYON
INVENTORY AND INITIAL OBSERVATIONS We began our inventory and analysis with various online sources, arial photos, and maps of the
area. Eventually, we were also able to get topography and slope analysis maps, soils maps, and various user
information about the park. We received a proposal packet from Nevada State Parks that included the
estimated number of uses, wildlife data, user preferences, and other relevant information. Unfortunately
some of this data was about 20 years old and may not be accurate. After compiling this data we looked at
the existing amenities in the park and the various requests for park improvements. We found that there was
a need for improvements to Echo Canyon and we created criteria for where those improvements should take
place. Our original analysis criteria was changed several times as we learned and understood more about
the site.
These criteria include:
• Slopes for campsites
• 0-5% Suitable but not particularly interesting to the users.
• 5-10% Most suitable. This grade provides some topographical interest and views, but it is
still manageable for constructing a campsite.
• 10-15% Not Suitable. While building on this grade is feasible we felt that a site at this
slope would require too much cut, fill, and other site preparation.
• Slopes for hiking
• 0-5% Easy walking trails. These trails typically follow the reservoir and water way. They
are great for families and users with limited mobility.
• 5-15% Moderate trails. This trail designation may include some sections of steeper slopes
but the majority of the trail falls within this range. Distance also plays a role in this
designation, and the existing ash trail falls into this category.
• 15%+ Difficult trails. These trails have long sections of step grade and difficult terrain,
and scrambling may be necessary. While the ash rim trail did have some of these features
it was not for long sections or particularly exposed areas. We don’t believe that an area in
the park will need this trail designation.
• Soils suitability. We created soils maps that outlined suitable, somewhat suitable, and unsuitable
areas for trails, and campsites. This information was collected from the USDA and the details of
their specific criteria for the ratings was not made available. Because we did not know what the
USDA was basing their recommendations on the soils studies did not carry as much weight in
our analysis as other factors did.
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
ECHO CANYON
• Views. Our views analysis was based on a few criteria.
• Available positive views. Including rock formations, the reservoir, stream, and expansive
views to the SW.
• Shielded views. These are areas that may be a good location for utilities or even campsites
because they are largely shielded by topography so as to not have such a visible impact
on the natural landscape.
ANALYSIS AND SUGGESTIONS With our collective data we began to overlay various maps to find the areas that are most suitable
for various activities.
Hiking Trails:
For the trails plan we looked at soils, topography, and views and began to lay out areas that would
provide users with the most enjoyable and interesting experience.
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
ECHO CANYON
Camping Soils Trail Soils
Camping Topo
Hiking Topo
Trails around the reservoir and stream
provided very easy and safe access while still
providing plenty of interest and beauty. However in
the stream areas we did find 2 items that need
improvement. First was overgrowth and second was
suitable trails. Upstream there are large amounts of
overgrowth that deter and even prevent users from
accessing the stream. In some areas the growth is so
thick that it prevents people from even seeing that
water. While some of this growth is wanted and
needed we recommend cutting some of the growth
out at strategic points. This would provide access to
the stream to interested users while still maintaining the natural beauty and beneficial properties of the plant
life. Our second recommendation correlates closely to the previous one. Along the stream there are very few
places where one can walk comfortably. The soil along the stream is very saturated and muddy making it
difficult to approach the water. We recommend building a boardwalk or gabion section of trail along the
stream for the enjoyment of the user and the protection of wildlife. This trail section would keep users out of
the mud which would improve the water quality for the fish life. The trail would also be a much safer and
enjoyable place to use. This section would be perfect for nature watchers, families, stream fishers, and those
with limited mobility. The reduced overgrowth in this area would also free up some of the waterway and
provide additional habitat for stream fish like rainbow trout.
For the ash canyon trail we overlaid our various criteria maps and found some sections of the
trail that did not fit within the criteria. Some sections of the trail were not on the best soil and other sections
were to steep (this according to our specifications). However, after hiking the trail we saw that at times you
have to throw criteria and analysis out the window. We found that the existing ash canyon trail is a great
trail for the more moderate hikers. It was interesting, beautiful, and fun and our only recommendation is a
few more way-finding signs on the first half of the trial. It wasn't always clear if we were on the right trail or
not because there were a few places where the trail split. Also at the top of the switchbacks there is a
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
ECHO CANYON
View from proposed ash canyon trail lookout
wonderful view of the whole valley and we recommend the construction of a lookout point with a map to
orient ones-self. Lastly some of the numbered signs and railings inside the canyon were in disrepair and may
need attention soon. Otherwise the Ash Canyon Trail is wonderful and should be capitalized on to draw
more visitors.
A potential trail (whose difficulty rating
would fall between the Ash Canyon Trial and the
Reservoir Trail) is located along a south ridge that
lies below the large cliff faces. Originally we felt that
the top of the cliffs on the south end of the park
would be a great location for a hike and lookout. But
upon further examination we felt that the lower shelf
would be equally if not more interesting. Large
expansive views can be enjoyed from the ash trail
and we feel that this southern trail should capitalize
on the opportunity to walk beside large vertical cliff
faces. Also, at the highest point on this proposed
trail one can still capture vast views to the SW. While the trail head could be located in the proposed group
use area or the new campsites we propose that the trail will be more interesting if approached from the other
direction. Therefor the trail head will begin as a spur off of the stream trail and head south and west up to
the lower ridge-line. once on the ridge the trail will head west following the ridge and cliff face until it exits
the canyon and overlooks the reservoir to the west. The trail will then head south and west again (perhaps
down switchbacks) and end at the group use or campground area.
Campsites:
For the campsite analysis we looked at topography, soils, distance from the reservoir, and views to
and from the campsite. We also payed close attention to its proximity to the other campsites and the visual
and environmental impacts of an additional campground. Ben Johnson asked us to not only design a new
campsite, but multiple cabin sites as well, and all of these elements were considered while designing.
The State Parks Devision had already chosen a site for additional campgrounds which they
located on the south side of the reservoir in the eastern most valley. Our analysis showed that the campsite
would fit fine in the valley the park had chosen. This valley comes off of the south east end of the reservoir
and is relatively flat (falling within the 0-5% slope for much of the area). This was our first choice as well, but
during a site visit we noticed that this area has less natural vegetation and juniper tree coverage than the
valley just west. The next valley over has slightly steeper topography and much more tree coverage.
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
ECHO CANYON
Therefor we feel that the more westerly valley is better suited for a campsite and/or cabins. The existing
road that travels up this second canyon can be utilized so there will be less site disturbance required at this
location as well.
After considering various options and planning for the cabins as well as the campsites, we
recommend placing the campsites in the previously determined area. The eastern most valley will be a great
location because of its isolation from the other campsites, proximity to the reservoir, proximity to trails, and
the low slope will be easily managed for camping. As we are trying to attract more users we feel that the
slope of this site will be beneficial to those in motor-homes and people pulling “toy haulers” as they will not
be struggling with uneven ground or tight corners caused from topography constraints. However this site
would need the addition of landscaping to provide sufficient shade to the site. We also recommend placing
the campsite on the far west end of the valley, abutting the next hill. The hill will provide early shade in the
summer as well as shield some of the negative views of the campsite from rout 323.
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
ECHO CANYON
N
The valley that lies directly to
the west is our proposed location for
the cabin sites. This valley is ideally
suited for the cabins for various
reasons. First, the existing road will
work well for the cabins. Smaller
branching roads or driveways can come off the main road and few additional grades will need to be created.
So (unlike most camping sites) a loop road will not be needed for these cabins. Second, we feel that the
steeper topography can be utilized better with cabins rather than standard tent sites. The cabins can be built
to compliment and work with the topography and frame specific views from the inside. Also this particular
valley is a little tighter and the cabins can be placed closer together while still providing privacy. The natural
tree cover in this area should be sufficient but some imported trees may be needed. In any case care should
be taken to not damage the exiting
trees, and proper transplantation
methods should be used to keep as
many as possible.
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
At the north eastern end of Echo Canyon proper, we propose a small camping site for those users
who would like to be slightly isolated from the rest. We also propose a small tent only campsite at the base of
the cliffs around where the stream passes under the road. This site would be perfect for those who like to be
isolated and enjoy a more traditional style of camping. The analysis does suggest that this site should be
small do to its proximity to the road and stream, and it is located further away from the general reservoir
which raises the issues of supervision.
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
N
Day Use:
In order to attract new users
and generate more revenue for the
park we suggest constructing a large
day-use area and additional
amenities like an amphitheater and
dinning area. By providing non-
traditional amenities the park will
attract a broader base of users.
These users may include boy scout,
girl scout, and youth groups, large
family gatherings like family
reunions, ATV groups, and silver
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
N
state trail users. The day use area that we have designed includes a large play area, gathering area/ fire pit,
and a eating area or mess hall. In order for this area to be successful we felt that it must be close to the
waters edge so that it could be used for many activities. While parents are preparing food or just resting in
the shade, they need to be in close proximity to their kids who will probably be playing by the water. This
day-use area provides that proximity as well as many other amenities. If a large group visits the park it this
area will provide the necessary space to accommodate them and their activities. The large fire-pit with
amphitheater seating will create a gathering place in the evening and it will also serve as a great location for
community events or park activities. The day use area was placed just north of the proposed campgrounds
and in close proximity to the cabins as well. While this location may not easily serve everyone we feel it is
best because it is well away from rout 323 and at the end of the reservoir road so it is in the safest location
possible.
Fish and Wildlife:
There is a need for fish and wildlife habitat in the reservoir so some method of providing that was
needed. After looking at many options we purport that a permanent solution is preferable because in the
long run it will mature better, provide more stability and habitat, and be more cost effective. Due to the
fluctuating water levels in the reservoir (about 20 ft annually) the habitat solution will have to account for this
and still be functional. In researching this topic we looked ant gabion wall construction and feel that this may
provide the best solution for the park. If constructed properly, plants can grow within them, alcoves can be
created for fish, and they may be used as walkways or fishing docs when the water levels are low. Besides
wildlife habitat these structures would also provide great educational and viewing opportunities. We propose
putting these structures along the reservoir bottom at various levels. Some of these structures may even rise
onto the shore to provide connectivity to the
concept and an esthetically pleasing
environment. As the water level recedes these
gabion bands would become exposed and the
foliage would begin to show through the
waters surface. This would alert boaters to
the danger and help them locate the fishing
habitat. As the water recedes further the
actual structure would start to show and
users people could walk on them, using them
as docs, fishing structures, or trails. These
elements could provide real interest to the
park while being functional at the same time.
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
CONCLUSION Overall we feel that these improvements would make the park a destination and a real pleasure to
those who visit. State parks in general need to update their appeal to the american consumer, large group
areas, cabins, and convenance focused amenities will provide that appeal. The public is willing to pay for
amenities so the park will be able to increase revenue and visitation. We realize that State Parks does not
have funding for many of these improvements, we also know that there are many other improvements that
have higher priority than these. But in concept we feel that these plans are intriguing and it would be very
interesting to see them built.
N o v e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 0 8
P r e p a r e d b y : S a m a n t h a F u l l e r • S t e w a r t C h r i s t e n s e n • U N L V L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e