經濟社會學 ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY: AN INTRODUCTION

Department of Sociology, Tunghai University

Spring, 2005 Wednesday: 7:10-10:00 p.m.

Instructor: 黃崇憲 Office Hours: Friday 2:00-4:00 p.m. or by appointment Phone: (04) 23590121 ext. 2988 Office: T 539 E-mail: momo@mail.thu.edu.tw

Course Description It is no doubt true that neoclassical economic has many splendid accomplishments to

its name. But it is equally clear that the current type of analytical economic has failed to integrate a social perspective into its analyses, and this prevents it from ultimately becoming a truly social science. It is in this situation that economic sociology comes into the picture. Though its origin can be traced back to the classical theories of Marx, Simmel, and especially Weber, economic sociology is a relatively new sub-field. This exciting strand of research emerged from work conducted on organizations, institutions, networks and political economy and since the mid-1980s has become one of the most active and promising areas of sociological research. Broadly defined, economic sociology may be seen as the attempt to analyze the economic phenomenon as social phenomenon or as resulting from human interaction, within the context of broader social structures. This is the introductory course to economic sociology, designed for students who want to grapple deeply with the problems of understanding economic processes from the vantage point of sociology.

Economic sociology is a rapidly growing sub-field that has pursued three projects to varying degrees over the past twenty years. First, it has examined the many prerequisites for and constraints on economic behavior as usually understood by economists. Second, and more ambitiously, it has tries to provide positive alternative accounts of economic phenomena themselves. Third, and most recently, it has tried both to broaden our conception of economic activity and develop an approach applicable across many empirical contexts.

1

In order to introduce the broad sweep of the new economic sociology, this course is arranged in three parts. Part I explores the broad relationship between economics as a discipline and intellectual tradition and economic sociology. This will involve elaborating some of the main ideas and principles of modern economics and then examining the ways in which sociological approaches to the economy represent complements or challenges to this tradition.

Part II of the course explores the core substantive concepts of economic sociology: embeddedness, networks, markets, firm, social capital. institutions, etc. This part introduces the foundational concepts of social embeddedness and institutions, and examines how these concepts distinguish economic sociology from neo-classical economics and its vision of actors, firms, and markets. The classical dichotomies of markets versus firms or markets versus states have dominated research and policy discussions, yet little consensus exists in the social sciences regarding the sources and economic effects of these social forms. Institutional economists and rational choice theorists in sociology and political science make a strong case that contracts, firms and states emerge as actors respond to market failures and the demands and uncertainties of competition and exchange. In contrast, economic sociologist typically invoke the importance of context, focusing on the social and political construction of markets, and the ways in which broader social and cultural structures enable, constrain and channel problem solving activity and the construction of hierarchies in markets. Likewise subject to ongoing debate are the effects of states and corporate hierarchies on efficiency, growth, and development. In many accounts, states and corporations are simply mechanisms by which economic and political elites concentrate power, create monopolies, and engage in predatory or rent-seeking behavior. For others, states and corporate hierarchies are essential for efficiency and economic development, at least under certain conditions. Equally important, sociologists have also begun to push theory and debate beyond conventional dichotomies, and have discovered the importance in capitalist societies of various cooperative alternatives to markets and hierarchies. These alternatives such as networks and associations figure centrally in sociologists’ efforts to move beyond markets and hierarchies and to theorize the social embeddedness of economic life. Moreover, where traditional analyses often dismiss networks and associations as “pre-modern” holdovers that impede progress and growth, economic sociologists, operating from different sensibilities, have found that such forms promote the trust, flexibility and capacities for innovation that are necessary for economic success in today’s increasingly globalized capitalism.

While Part I & II of this course are primarily concerned with abstract conceptual and theoretical problems, Part III will build on those analyses of the social structural elements of economic life to examine the variety and organizational diversity of advanced capitalist societies. It will be preoccupied with some exemplar works by Fred Block, AnnaLee Saxenian, Viviana Zelizer, Charles Lindblom, etc. Much of this part will revolve around an

2

attempt to understand the functioning of various institutions in the globalized economy of mature capitalism. We’ll explore this problem in terms of the social organization of production, looking respectively at the organization of markets, firms, sectors, and regions. We shall conclude the course with the issues of the challenge of globalization and the rise of regional economies. The future economic sociology project that remains the most difficult, I would argue, is figuring out how to link production and consumption.

Although this course may serve as partial preparation for the Economic Sociology preliminary examination, no guarantee of comprehensiveness is assumed. Coverage of topics is not at the level of depth necessary for the exam. This seminar offers an introduction to the field’s key conceptual approaches at the expense of some specific empirical domains. Little attention is paid, for instance, to processes of globalization, the role of technology and innovation in economic growth, labor markets, or consumption. The goal, simply, is to provide a framework that can ground further exploration of the field and a supplementary list of topics is also added in the end of this syllabus to give the student a taste of the vibrancy of the area. Class Citizenship

This course is designed as a discussion, research, and writing course. Lectures will form a small part of what we do in class. This is a participatory seminar. Please take time to read assignments carefully and thoughtfully. We will expect everyone to come to class prepared to summarize the main arguments in the readings and to discuss their strengths, weakness, the execution of the research, usefulness for theory building, and so on. I do not intend to lecture the class. In order to facilitate class discussion, we will begin each class right after the weekly presentation with a collective attempt to establish what the central arguments and the crucial issues of the readings are. Please always bring a copy of the reading so that you can consult it during our discussion. This way we can all, literally, be on the same page.

In a seminar course of this sort, it is my wish that I want the sessions and discussions to be as stimulating and exciting as possible, with a collegial and supportive atmosphere. Pedagogically, this seminar is dedicated to the proposition that knowledge is a collective product. This intellectual journey is intended to be collective; each participant (including me) is expected to contribute to our discussions and debates. Good seminars depend to a great extent on the seriousness of preparation by students. Let us all be good and responsible class citizens to make contributions as much as possible. Requirements and Grading:

The requirements for this course are fourfold. You must fulfill all four of them; do not take this course if for whatever reason you cannot do so. All participants will be expected to: 1) take an active part in discussions (20%); 2) make at least three presentations on the readings to the seminar during the semester (20%); 3) prepare seven memos on the week’s

3

required readings (20%); 4) a final term paper or a critical journal (40%). 1) Active Participation in Discussion: remember and apply this aphorism of Wittgenstein:

“Even to have expressed a false thought boldly and clearly is already to have gained a great deal.” So speak up and speak out! What each of you will get out of the course depends in good measure on how much you collectively put in. So, play a constructive role in discussion: offer your own ideas in small chunks instead of long monologues; draw out and ask for clarification of the opinions of others; pose issues and questions you may not know the answer to; learn to permit someone to disagree with you without feeling attacked; learn to express disagreement in ways that promote constructive discussion instead of polarization.

2) Seminar Presentations: Each week students will present that week’s readings and lead discussions. These presentations should be 25-30 minutes long for each and should try to establish a focused agenda for the discussion that follows. The point of the presentation is not to comprehensively summarize the readings, but to provide a critical evaluation, focusing on the strengths and weakness of the arguments/analyses, comparing different perspectives, and highlighting the most important issues and questions they raise as a way of launching the day’s discussion.

3) Weekly Issue Memo: to facilitate collective learning and avoid a situation of “pluralistic ignorance”, every week participants will submit issue-memo to the class as a whole by e-mail. I believe strongly that it is important for students to engage the week’s readings in written form prior to the seminar sessions. These weekly memos are intended to prepare the ground for good discussions by requiring participants to set out their initial responses to the readings which will improve the quality of the class discussion since students come to the sessions with an already thought-out agenda.

I refer to these short written comments as “issue memos”. They are not meant to be mini-papers on the readings; nor need they summarize the readings as such. Rather, they are meant to be a think-piece, reflecting your own intellectual engagement with the material: specifying what is obscure or confusing in the reading; taking up issue with some core idea or argument; exploring some interesting ramification of an idea in the reading. These memos do not have to deal with the most profound, abstract or grandiose arguments in the readings; the point is that they should reflect what you find most engaging, exciting or puzzling.

We will arrange to share these memos through e-mail, and the week’s presenters, if s/he likes, can use other students’ comments to prepare an agenda for discussion. In order for everyone to have time to read over other’s comments, these will be imperatively due on e-mail NO LATER THAN 12:AM THE DAY OF CLASS. You are encouraged to read and to respond to each other’s issue memos both before and after the week’s meeting. These memos are a real requirement, and failing to hand in memos will affect your grade. I will read through the memos to see if they are “serious”, but not grade them for “quality”. Since

4

the point of this exercise is to enhance discussions, late memos will not be accepted. If you have to miss a seminar session for some reason, you are still required to prepare an issue memo for that session. Since I may not total the number of memos each student writes until the end of the semester, please keep copies to be sure of fulfilling the requirements. Students who submit memos should also be prepared to summarize/explain them in class. 4) Term Paper: the central assignment of this course is a crispy written, analytically rigorous term paper of no more than 15 pages (this limit is expressly designed to compel you to write with economy, precision and clarity). Students should meet with me to discuss their papers in week 7. A three-page proposal for the paper, with a set of questions, a bibliography, and some preliminary findings or evidence are to be submitted for approval by the instructor on or before 13 April. Students will present their work in progress in term-paper workshop in week 9, 20 April. Therefore, you may find it appropriate to begin thinking about term paper early in the course. Please feel free to discuss your ideas with me whenever you are ready to do so. Papers may be theoretical or reviews that work on one or more of the theoretical perspectives covered in the course. An empirical paper is also acceptable, but this will be more demanding since access to data may not be easy to obtain. The choice is up to each student. Guidelines for format of the paper are the Journal of Taiwanese Sociology guidelines. These guidelines are used in the hope that you will submit your term paper to the annual conference of Taiwanese Sociological Association. To help you develop your ideas and academic presentation skills, class section 9 will be devoted to presentations and discussions of student term papers. Papers connected to dissertation research are strongly recommended. Alternative Option: Keeping a Critical Journal.

This option consists of writing an analytic journal on the issues raised in the course. The journal will consist of a healthy number of typed entries on specific topics generated by readings, discussions, and any other material you encounter. Each entry would normally be between a paragraph and several pages in length. The whole journal may be about 20-25 pages in length, and each entry should demonstrate both your knowledge of the reading as well as your own ideas arising from it. Ponder Beth Schneider’s criteria: “Better journals will demonstrate broad knowledge of the reading, integrate materials, compare authors, display thoughtful, sociologically grounded writing. Length without integration, details without analysis, unsubstantiated opinions will not be sufficient.” A journal with a high grade would have both breadth (i.e. will cover most of the weekly topics and readings), and quality insights.

The purpose of this critical journal is to write a personal handbook of economic sociology based primarily on the readings we will be doing during this semester. For at least some of the topics, you will be expected to do some additional reading by following

5

up some of the footnotes in the assigned core readings or in suggested readings you will be doing for the class sessions. This project should quickly become part of your ongoing work during the semester. If you leave this until the end of the semester it will be impossible to complete the task on schedule. Detailed Instructions A. Concepts

Your handbook should include on at least 10 concepts. At least 7 of these concepts must come from the following list, and you will need to add at least 3 additional concepts of your own to make the total of 10. Core list of concepts 1. embeddedness 2. markets 3. contracts 4. firms 5. networks 6. path dependency 7. bounded rationality 8. transaction costs 9. risk 10. trust 11. uncertainty 12. externalities 13. globalization 14. regionalization 15. class 16. exploitation 17. rationality 18. preferences 19. culture and economy 20. consumption 21. financial market 22. prisoners’ dilemmas 23. free riding 24. information asymmetries 25. developmental state

6

B. Authors The handbook should also include entries for at least 5 scholars who have made

significant contributions to economic sociology (this can include sociologically-minded economists). The following is a suggested list, but you are not restricted to this list. The idea for these entries is not to include mini-intellectual biographies, but to explicate and comment on the core intellectual contribution of the scholar. Suggested list of scholars in economic sociology 1. Max Weber 2. Emile Durkheim 3. Karl Marx 4. Oliver Williamson 5. James Coleman 6. Amitai Etzioni 7. Albert Hirschman 8. Herbert Simmon 9. Karl Polanyi 10. Harrison White 11. Mark Granovetter 12. Arthur Stinchcombe 13. Joseph Schumpeter 14. Gary Becker 15. George Akerlof 16. Kenneth Arrow 17. Mancur Olson 18. Neil Smelser 19. Richard Swedberg 20. Daniel Bell 21. Jon Elster 22. Amartya Sen 23. Robert Solow 24. Aage Sorensen 25. Fred Block c. What to do in your entries

a. There is no set format for entries in the handbook, and no rigid specification for length. The general expectation is that the author entries will be of 1-2 pages each and the concept entries will be 1-5 pages (not counting bibliographic citations), but these are only rough guidelines. Entry can vary a lot in complexity and length.

7

Some of them can be short, crisp discussions of some narrow issues; others can be more extended mini-essays on debates over theoretical issues involving the concept.

b. For some of the concepts you may want to focus on the problem of the formal definition (or alternative definitions), especially where the definitions is contested in the literature. If you choose the concepts of “exploitation” or “class”, for example, there is much debate about how to define these concepts which could be a useful way of organizing your discussion. For other concepts the central issue may be less formal definition and more the theoretical relevance of the concept, how it is linked to various kinds of explanations or questions. In a discussion of the concepts of “rationality” or “preference”, for example, you might want to focus on such theoretical issues rather than formal definitions. And in some cases you might want to discuss the historical development of the concept. Of course, you can do more than one of these things in a given entry.

c. Whatever the specific focus of your entry, wherever possible it is good to try to clarify debates over the concept and its theoretical status. This is not a requirement for all entries, but it is something to keep in mind as you organize your ideas.

d. Whether or not your entry revolves around a discussion of alternative definitions, most entries should begin with an explicit discussion of the definition of the concept. I recommend that this be identified by a specific section heading.

e. In longer mini-essay type entries you should use section headings to divide up the internal structure of the discussion. Depending upon the concept, the following sorts of headings might be appropriate: definitions; theoretical debates; standard economic treatments of X; sociological versus economics analyses; development of the concept; empirical implications; bibliography.

f. Entries should not be mainly recapitulations of the lectures from class. You can, of course, draw on the ideas in the lectures and class discussions, but the handbook should be your own integration and reflection on the ideas.

g. The entries should also include a bibliography of the sources to which you explicitly refer in the discussion. You can also include a supplementary bibliography of works dealing with the topic which you do not directly discuss, but this is less important.

D. Suggested Strategy

I suggest that you create a directory on your computer for this class and then create a separate file for each of the concepts and authors. (You might even want to create a separate sub-directory for each concept and author). As you do the reading for the semester you can then easily add ideas, summaries, commentaries to each of these. In general you will need

8

to rewrite and edit these entries in order to turn them into coherent pieces. E. Due Dates

In order to be sure you are on track on this assignment, I want to read an example of one concept entry and one author entry no later than 4/10. The complete handbook is due in class on 6/29. About Incompletes: Taking an incomplete is like going into debt with a loan shark. The day the deadline is past, interest starts accruing and the quality of paper you think you need to write grows exponentially. Most of the students I have given incompletes to in the past have taken much longer time and difficulties getting them done, and I have decided I must change my formerly lax policy. You are far better off doing the paper you can do now than trying to do the paper you wish you could do later. I am wiling to negotiate a deadline with you that accommodates your other obligations (e.g. grading responsibilities as a TA), but you must meet the deadline. If you realize you have defined your paper more broadly than you can execute, speak to me about narrowing the bounds of the paper, not about taking longer to do it. Textbooks: Swedberg, Richard. 2003. The Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton

University Press. Granovetter, Mark and Richard Swedberg. 2001. The Sociology of Economic Life.

Boulder: Westview. Block, Fred. 1990. Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse.

Berkeley: University of California Press. Block, Fred著，鄭陸霖、吳泉源譯，《後工業機會》。台北：群學。 Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley

and Route 128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Saxenian, AnnaLee著，彭蕙仙、常雲鳳譯，《區域優勢》。台北：天下文化。 Zelizer, Viviana. 1994. The Social Meaning of Money: Pin Money, Paychecks, Poor Relief,

and Other Currencies. New York: Basic Books. Zelizer, Viviana.著，陳難能譯，《金錢的社會意義》。台北：正中。 Lindblom, Charles. 2001. The Market System: What It Is, How It Works, and What to

Make of It. New Heavens: Yale University Press. Lindblom, Charles著，胡瑋珊譯，《市場不只一隻手》。台北：新新聞。 Recommended Books: Swedberg, Richard. 1990. Economics and Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

*This book is a set of interviews with leading scholars who have pursued a research

9

program in economic sociology (broadly defined). This can be viewed as background reading.

Smelser, Neil and Richard Swedberg. 1994. Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. *The Handbook is a good place to start to get a feel for the heterogeneity and a thorough overview of the field. The articles are surveys of the various topics and each contains a substantial bibliography wich will provide a useful guide to the journal literature in the various topics under considerations. A new edition of this Handbook is coming soon.

Carruthers, Bruce and Sarah Babb. 2000. Economy/Society: Markets, Meanings, and Social Structure. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.

Swedberg, Richard. 1998. Max Weber and the Idea of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Friedland, Roger and A.F. Robertson. 1990. Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economy and Society. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Trigilia, Carlo. 2002. Economic Sociology: State, Market, and Society in Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Biggart, Nicole Woolsey. 2002. Readings in Economic Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell. Fligstein, Neil. 2001. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of

Twentieth-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Guillen, Mauro, et al. eds. 2002. The New Economic Sociology: Developments in an

Emerging Field. New York: Russell Sage. Callon, Michael, ed. 1998. The Laws of the Market. Oxford: Blackwell. Dobbin, Frank, ed. 2004. The New Economic Sociology: A Reader. Princeton: Princeton

University Press. Dobbin, Frank, ed. 2004. The Sociology of the Economy. New York: Russell Sage

Foundation. Mizruchi, Mark and Michael Schwartz, eds. 1987. Intercorporate Relations: The Structural

Analysis of Business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Swedberg, Richard, ed. 1993. Explorations in Economic Sociology. New York: Russell

Sage. Zukin, Sharon and Paul DiMaggio, eds. 1990. Structures of Capital: The Social

Organization of the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. I am always happy to recommend additional readings tailored to your interests. Please see me before or after class, or in office hours.

10

COURSE AGENDA AND WEEKLY THEMES

PART I. ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY DIVIDE Week 1. (2/23) Course Introduction: The main Lines of Economic Sociology Week 2. (3/2) Setting the Stage: The Big Ideas of Classical and

Neo-classical Economics Week 3 (3/9) Economic Sociology as a Supplement or Challenge to Neo-classical Economics Week 4. (3/16) New Institutional Economics: Efficiency Explanations

of Social Institutions

PART II. CORE CONCEPTS

Week 5 (3/23) Embeddedness: Manifesto of New Economic Sociology Week 6 (3/30) Networks Week 7 (4/6) Markets Week 8 (4/13) Mid-term exam (No Class, Term Paper Outline Due) Week 9 (4/20) Term Paper Workshop Week 10 (4/27) Firms Week 11 (5/4) Social Capital Week 12 (5/11) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.

PART III: EXEMPLAR STUDIES

Week 13 (5/18) Fred Block: Postindustrial Possibilities Week 14 (5/25) AnnaLee Saxenian: Regional Advantage Week 15 (6/1) Viviana Zelizer: The Social Meaning of Money Week 16 (6/8) Charles Lindblom: The Market System Week 17 (6/15) Wrap-up and Reflection Week 18 (6/22) Final Exam (No Class)

PART IV. SUPPLENTARY TOPICS I. Exploitation and Class Analysis II. The Sociology of Labor Market III. The New Institutionalism IV. Contracts V. Economic Systems: Historical and Taxonomic Variations

11

VI. The “Regulation School.” and “Social Structure of Accumulation”

VII. Globalization and Regionalization VIII. “Mass Production” and “Flexibility” IX. Associations: Labor Relations, Communities of Learning and Technology Innovations X. What Is a Price? How Are They Constructed? How Are They Interpreted? XI. Global Commodity Chains, Global Production, Global

Markets XII. Financial Capitalism XIII. Consumption

12

SEMINAR SESSIONS & READING ASSIGNMENTS

PART I. ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY DIVIDE Week 1. (2/23) Course Introduction: The Main Lines of Economic Sociology This week will provide a brief overview of this course. Come to class with a list of preferences about which week you’d like to do the presentation. We’ll then establish the schedule for the whole semester. Be prepared to be flexible. Week 2. (3/2) Setting the Stage: The Big Ideas of Classical and

Neo-classical Economics Background Readings Friedman, Milton, and Rose Friedman. 1980. Free to Choose: A Personal Statement.

Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. pp. 9-69 Core Reading Galbraith, John. Kenneth. 1998 [1958]. The Affluent Society. London: Hamilton. Chapter

3-7. *These chapters lay out the history of classical economic thought from Adam Smith to the present. Galbraith argues that economic theories are stuck in the assumptions of 18th-century, pre-industrial England, where they were forged.

Hirsch, Paul, Stuart Michaels, and Ray Friedman. 1990. “Clean Models Versus Dirty Hands: Why Economics Is Different from Sociology.” Pp. 39-56 in Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy, edited by Sharon Zukin and Paul DiMaggio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

*This article defines economics in contrast to sociology, a theme to which we will return many times.

Suggested Readings Bell, Daniel. 1981. “Models and Reality in Economic Discourse.” pp. 46-81 in The Crisis

in Economic Theory, edited by Daniel Bell and Irving Kristol. New York: Basic books. *Bell traces the history of economic theory in brief and argues for its integration with the other social sciences.

Nelson, Julie. 1992. “Gender, Metaphor and the Definition of Economics.” Economics and Philosophy (8): 103-125. *This is an unusual take on the definition of economics, arguing that the definition of economics are based on gendered assumptions. This is related to what J.K. Galbraith is saying about economics being rooted in 18th-century pre-industrial assumptions.

13

The larger point is, economics, like all academic disciplines, is an artifact of history. Baron, James and Michael Hannan. 1994. “The Impact of Economics on Contemporary

Sociology.” Journal of Economic Literature 32: 1111-46. Becker, Gary. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of

Chicago Press. Pp. 3-14. Bartlett, Randall. 1989. Economics and Power: An Inquiry into Human Relations and

Markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Week 3 (3/9) Economic Sociology as a Supplement or Challenge to Neo-classical Economics Background Readings Swedberg, Richard. 2003. The Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton

University Press. Chapter 1 Swedberg, Richard. 1997. “New Economic Sociology: What has Been Accomplished, What

is Ahead?” Acta Sociologica 40: 161-182. Core Reading Swedberg, Richard, Ulf Himmelstrand, and Goran Brulin. 1990. “The Paradigm of

Economic Sociology.” pp.57-86 in Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy, edited by Sharon Zukin and Paul DiMaggio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Suggested Readings Smelser, Neil, and Richard Swedberg. 1994. “The Sociological Perspective on the

Economy.” pp.3-26 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Granovetter, Mark. 1990. “The Old and the New Economic Sociology: A History and Agenda.” pp.89-112 in Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economy and Society, edited by Roger Friedland and A.F. Robertson. NewYork: Aldine de Gruyter.

Sen, Amartya. 1977. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Assumptions of Economic Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(4): 317-344.

Simon, Herbert. 1986. “Rationality in Psychology and Economic.” Journal of Business 59(4): 209-224.

DiMaggio, Paul. 1990. “Cultural Aspects of Economic action and Organization.” Pp. 113-136 in Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economy and Society, edited by Roger Friedland and A.F. Robertson. NewYork: Aldine de Gruyter.

Hart, Keith. 1990. “The Idea of Economy: Six Modern Dissenters.” Pp. 137-160 in Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economy and Society, edited by Roger Friedland and A.F. Robertson. NewYork: Aldine de Gruyter.

14

Hamilton, Gary and Robert Feenstra. 1998. “The Organization of Economies.” Pp. 153-180 in The New Institutionalism in Sociology, edited by Mary Brinton and Victor Nee. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Greif, Avner. 1994. “Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies.” Journal of Political Economy 102: 912-950.

DiMaggio, Paul. 1994. “Culture and Economy.” pp.27-57 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hirsch, Paul, Stuart Michaels, and Ray Friedman. 1990. “Clean Models vs. Dirty Hands: Why Economics is Different from Sociology.” pp.39-56 in Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy, edited by Sharon Zukin and Paul DiMaggio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swedberg, Richard, and Mark Granovetter. 1992. “Introduction.” pp.1-26 in The Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Mark Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder: Westview Press.

Block, Fred. 1990. “Economic Sociology.” pp.21-45 in Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse, by Fred Block. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Stinchcombe, Arthur. 1983. “The Economic Sociology of Neo-Marxism.” Pp.1-26 in Economic Sociology, by Arthur Stinchcombe. Orlando: Academic Press.

Swedberg, Richard. 1998. Max Weber and the Idea of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Week 4. (3/16) New Institutional Economics: Efficiency Explanations of

Social Institutions Background Readings: Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1994. “The Return of Institutional Economics.” pp.58-76 in The

Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Core Readings: Williamson, Oliver. 1981. “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost

Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 87: 548-77. Suggested Readings: Williamson, Oliver. 1994. “Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory.”

pp.77-107 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

15

DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147-160.

Eggertsson, Thrainn. 1990. Economic Behavior and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

PART II. CORE CONCEPTS

Week 5 (3/23) Embeddedness: Manifesto of New Economic Sociology:

Embeddedness of Economic Actions Background Readings: Swedberg, Richard. 2003. The Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton

University Press. Chapter 2 Barber, Bernard. 1985. “All economies are ‘embedded’: The Career of a Concept and

Beyond.” Social Research 62: 388-413. Core Readings: Polanyi, Karl. 2001 [1957]. “The Economy as Instituted Process.” Pp. 31-50 in Sociology

of Economic Life, edited by Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder: Westview. Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of

Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 481-510.-Reprinted in Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder: Westview. Pp. 51-77.

Questions to ponder: What does Granovetter mean by embeddedness? What is embedded in what and with what consequence? How general is the concept of embeddedness? What is the influence of social organization on both economic and authoritative organizations? Suggested Readings: Granovetter, Mark. 1992. “Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology.” 25-56 in

Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, edited by Nitin Nohria and Robert Eccles. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Granovetter, Mark. 1993. “The Nature of Economic Relationships.” pp.3-61 in Explorations in Economic Sociology, edited by Richard Swedberg. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Uzzi, Brian. 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect.” American Sociological Review 61(4): 674-698.

16

Uzzi, Brian. 1999. “Embeddness in the Making of Financial Capital.” American Sociological Review 64: 481-505.

Zukin, Sharon and Paul DiMaggio. 1990. “Introduction.” Pp. 1-36 in Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy, edited by Sharon Zukin and Paul DiMaggio. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Macaulay, Stewart. 2001. “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study.” Pp. 191-206 in Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder: Westview.

Dalton, Melville. 2001. “Men Who Manage.” Pp. 247-272 in Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder: Westview.

Block, Fred, and Margaret Somers. 1984. “Beyond the Economistic Fallacy: The Holistic Social Science of Karl Polanyi.” pp.47-84.in Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Portes, Alejandro and Julia Sensenbrenner. 1998. “Embeddedness and Immigration: Note on Social Determinants of Economic Action.” pp.127-149 in The New Institutionalism in Sociology, edited by Mary Brinton and Victor Nee. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Reprinted in Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder: Westview.

Nee, Victor and Paul Ingram. 1998. “Embeddedness and Beyond: Institution, Exchange, and Social Structure.” pp.19-45 in The New Institutionalism in Sociology, edited by Mary Brinton and Victor Nee. New York: Russell SageFoundation.

Boyer, Robert and Rogers Hollinsworth. 1997. “From National Embeddedness to Spatial and Institutional Nestedness.” pp.433-484 in Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions, edited by J. Rogers Hollingsworth and Robert Boyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

潘美玲、張維安，2003，〈經濟行動與社會關係：社會自我保護機制的研究〉，《台灣社會學刊》第三十期，頁 51-88。

Week 6 (3/30) Networks Background Readings: Swedberg, Richard. 2003. The Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton

University Press. Chapter 3 Granovetter, Mark. 1979. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology

78:1360-80. Mizruchi, Mark. 1994. “Social Network Analysis: Recent Achievements and Current

Controversies.” Acta Sociologica 37: 329-343. Norhria, Nitin. 1992. “Is a Network Perspective a Useful Way of Studying Organization.”

Pp. 1-22 in Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, edited by Nitin Nohria and Robert Eccles. Cambridge: Harvard university Press.

17

Core Readings: Powell, Walter, and Laurel Smith-Doerr. 1994. “Networks and Economic Life.” Pp368-402

in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Questions to ponder: Is the concept of network a useful way to conceptualize embeddedness? What is a network? Do networks differ from place to place and time to time? Does it make sense to view social organization as a form of relational network? Suggested Readings: Powell, Walter. 1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Form of Organization.”

pp.295-336 in Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 12, edited by L. L. Cummings and B. Shaw. Greenwich: JAI Press.

Burt, Ronald. 2004. “Structural Holes and Good Ideas.” American Journal of Sociology 110(2); 349-399.

Uzzi, Brain. 1996. “Embeddedness and Economic Performance.: The Network Effect.” American Sociological Review 61: 674-698.

Uzzi, Brian. 1997. “Social Structure and Competition in Inter-firm Networks: The Paradox of Embdeddedness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35-67.

Ebers, Mark. ed. 1997. The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nohria, Nitin and Robert Eccles. 1992. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Powell, Walter, K.W. Koput & L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.” Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116-145.

Owen-Smith, J. & W.W. Powell. 2003. “The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences: Assessing the Importance of Experience and connectivity.” Research Policy 32 (9): 1695-1711.

Podolny, Joel and Toby Stuart. 1995. “A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change.” American Journal of Sociology 100(5): 1224-1260.

Podolny, Joel. 2001. “Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market.” American Journal of Sociology 107: 33-60.

Zuckerman, Ezra, et al., 2003. “ Robust Identities or Nonentities? Typecasting in the Feature-Film Labor Market.” American Journal of Sociology 108(5): 1018-174.

Geertz, Clifford. 1978. “The Bazaar Economy: Information and Search in Peasant Marketing.” American Economic Review 68: 28-32.

18

McLean, Paul and John Padgett. 2004. “Obligation, Risk, and Opportunity in the Renaissance Economy.” Pp. 193-227 in The Sociology of the Economy, edited by Frank Dobbin. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

陳介玄，1994，《協力網絡與生活結構——台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析》，台北：聯經。

陳介玄，1995，《貨幣網絡與生活結構——地方金融、中小企業與台灣世俗社會之轉 化》，台北：聯經。

陳介玄，1998，《台灣產業的社會學研究——轉型中的中小企業》，台北：聯經。 陳介玄，2001，《班底與老闆——台灣企業組織能力之發展》，台北：聯經 陳東升，2003，《積體網路：台灣高科技產業的社會學分析》，台北：群學。 張苙雲編，1999，《網絡台灣——企業的人情關係與經濟理性》，台北：遠流。 于宗先、王金利著，2000，《台灣中小企業的成長》。台北：聯經。 周添城、林志誠著，1999，《台灣中小企業的發展機制》，台北：聯經。 柯志明，1993，《台灣都市小型製造業的創業、經營與生產組織——以五分埔成衣製

造業為案例的分析》，台北：中研院民族所。 施振榮，2000，《IO聯網組織：知識經濟的經營之道》，台北：天下雜誌。 吳思華、沈榮欽，1999，〈台灣積體電路產業的形成與發展〉，蔡敦浩編《管理資本在 台灣》，頁 57-150，台北：遠流。

鄭陸霖，1999，〈一個半邊陲的浮現與隱藏：國際鞋類市場網絡重組下的生產外移〉， 台灣社會研究季刊》第三十五期，頁 1-46。

鄭陸霖、林鶴玲，2001，〈社運在網際網路上的展現：台灣社會運動網站的聯網分析〉，《台灣社會學》第二期，頁 55-96。

潘美玲、張維安，2001，〈彈性生產與協力網絡：協力廠觀點的個案研究〉，《台灣社會學刊》第二十五期，頁 201-242。

謝國雄，1989，〈外包制度—比較歷史的回顧〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第二卷第一期，頁 29-69。

謝國雄，1989，〈黑手變頭家——台灣製造業中的階級流動〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第二卷第二期，頁 11-54。

謝國雄，1992，〈隱形工廠：台灣的外包點與家庭代工〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第十三期，頁 137-160。

謝國雄，1992，〈市場文化與市場社會：工業化的社會史研究〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第十三期，頁 273-281。

謝國雄，1993，〈事頭、頭家與立業基之活化——台灣小型製造單位創立及存活過程之研究〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第十五期，頁 93-130。

Week 7 (4/6) Markets Background Readings: Swedberg, Richard. 2003. The Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton

University Press. Chapter 5-6

19

Polanyi, Karl. 1957 (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press. pp.33-129

White, Harrison. 1981. “Where do Markets Come From?” American Journal of Sociology 87(3): 517-547.

Core Readings: Geertz, Clifford. 2001. “The Bazaar Economy: Information and Search in Peasant

marketing.” Pp. 139-145 in Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder: Westview.

Fligstein, Neil. 1996. “Markets as Politics: A Political-cultural Approach to Market Institutions.” American Sociological Review 61(4): 656-673.

Suggested Readings: Swedberg, Richard. 1994. “Markets as Social Structure.” pp.255-82 in The Handbook of

Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Block, Fred. 1990. “The Market.” pp.46-74 in Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse, by Fred Block. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of Californi Press.

Fligstein, Neil and Iona Mara-Drita. 1996. “How to Make a Market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union.” American Journal of Sociology 102: 1-33.

Hirschman, Albert. 1986. “Exit and Voice: An Expanding Sphere of Influence.” 77-101 in Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays by Albert Hirschman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hirschman, Albert. 1986. “Rival Review of Market Society.” pp.105-141 in Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays by Albert Hirschman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Friedland, Roger and A. F. Robertson. 1990. “Beyond the Marketplace.” 3-49 in Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economy and Society, edited by Roger Friedland and A. F. Robertson. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Baker, Wayne. 1984. “The Social Structure of a National Security Market.” American Journal of Sociology 89(4): 775-811.

Are Markets Natural? Hayek, Friedrich. 1945. “The Uses of Knowledge in the Economy.” American Economic

Review 35: 519-530. Smith, Adam. 1775. The Wealth of Nations. Selections in Nicole Biggart (2002) Readings

in Economic Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell.

20

Weber, Max. 1978. Selections from Economy and Society in Nicole Biggart (2002) Readings in Economic Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell.

Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press. Chapters 4-6, pp. 43-76 (“Societies and Economic System”; “Evolution of the Market Pattern”; “The Self-regulating Market and the Fictitious Commodities: Labor, Land, and Money”)

Weber, Max. 1982 [1927]. General Economic History. New Brunswick: Transaction Press. Haveman, Heather and Hayagreeva Rao. 1997. “Structuring a Theory of Moral Sentiments:

Institutional and Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry.” American Journal of Sociology 102(6): 1606-51.

The Rise of the Market Braudel, Fernand. 1977. Afterthoughts on Material Civilization and Capitalism. Baltimore:

John Hopkins University Press. Hirschman, Albert. 1977. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for

Capitalism before its Triumph. Swedberg, Richard. 2005. “Markets in Society.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology,

edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Nee, Victor. 1989. “A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State

Socialism.” American Sociological Review 54: 663-681. Stark, David. 1996. “Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism.” American

Journal of Sociology 101(4): 993-1027. Markets I: Institutions and Self Interest Abolafia, Mitchel. 1996. Making Markets: Opportunism and Restraint on Wall Street.

Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Market II. Market as Cultural, Social and Political Systems Zelizer, Viviana. 1979, Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the

United States. New York: Transaction Publishers. Macaulay, Stewart. 1963. “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study.”

American Sociological Review 28: 55-69. Dobbin, Frank and Timothy Dowd. 2000. “The Market that Anti-trust Built.” American

Sociological Review 65: 631-657. Callon, Michael. 1998. “Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in

Economics.” Pp. 1-57 in The Laws of the Market, edited by Michael Callon. Oxford: Blackwell.

Mackenzie, Donald and Yuval Millo. 2003. “Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 107-145.

21

Abolafia, Mitchel. 1998. “Markets as Cultures: An Ethnographic Approach.” Pp. 69-85 in The Laws of the Market, edited by Michael Callon. Oxford: Blackwell.

Market III. Market as Politics Fligstein, Neil. 1996. “Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market

Institutions.” American Sociological Review 61: 656-73. Campbell, John and Leon Lindberg. 1990. “Property Rights and the Organization of

Economic Activity by the State.” American Sociological Review 55(5): 634-47. Granovetter, Mark and Patrick McGuire. 1998. “The Making of an Industry: Electricity in

the United States.” Pp. 147-173 in The Laws of the Markets, edited by Michael Callon. Oxford: Blackwell.

Fligstein, Neil. 2001. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twentieth-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Biggart, Nicole and Mauro Guillen. 1999. “Developing Difference: Social Organization and the Rise of the Auto Industries in South Korea, Taiwan, Spain and Argentina.” American Sociological Review 64: 722-47.

Market IV: Market as Industry or Region or Network or Recipe Leifer, Eric and Harrison White. 1987. “A Structural Approach to Markets.” Pp. 85-108 in

Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business, edited by Mark Mizruchi and Michael Schwartz. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Porter, Michael. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan, pp. 180-195, “The German Printing Industry”.

Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1996. “Inside-Out: Regional Networks and Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128.” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 2(2): 41-60.

Whitley, Richard. 1992. “The Social Construction of Organizations and Markets: The Comparative Analysis of Business Recipes.” Pp. 10-143 in Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis. London: Sage.

Porter, Michael. 1998. “Clusters and Competition: New Agendas for Companies, Governments, and Institutions.” Pp. 197-288 in On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business Review.

Porter, Michael. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press., Chapter 1, “The Structural Analysis of Industries.” Pp. 3-33.

Week 8 (4/13) Mid-term exam (No Class, Term Paper Outline Due)

22

Week 9 (4/20) Term Paper Workshop The paper outlines submitted will be distributed to all participants to be discussed

during this seminar term paper workshop. Participants will be assigned a commentator role for one paper other than their own and will lead the discussion of this paper outline. This workshop will give you a chance to organize your ideas for your paper and get feedback from the other students in the class.

Week 10 (4/27) Firms: Entrepreneurship, Management, Hierarchy Background Readings: Swedberg, Richard. 2003. The Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton

University Press. Chapter 4 Chandler, Alfred. 1984. “The Emergence of managerial Capitalism.” Business History

Review 58 (4): 473-507. Williamson, Oliver. 1981. “The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes.”

Journal of Economic literature 19(4): 1537-1568. Core Readings: Coase, Ronald. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Econometrica 4: 386-405 Granovetter, Mark. 2001. “Coase Revisited: Business Groups in the Modern economy.” Pp.

327-356 in Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder: Westview.

Suggested Readings: Martinelli, Albert. 1994. “Entrepreneurship and Management.” pp.476-503 in The

Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Nohria, Nitin, and Ranjay Gulati. 1994. “Firms and Their Environments.” Pp.529-555 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Chandler, Alfred. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. pp.1-12, 455-500.

Williamson, Oliver. 1985. “The Modern Coporation.” pp.273-297 in The Economic Institutions of Capitalism by Oliver Williamson. New York: Free Press.

Putterman, Louis and Randall Kroszner, eds. 1996. The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Willanson, Oliver and Sidney Winter, eds. 1993. The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Freeland, Robert. 1996. “The Myth of the M-Form: Governance, Consent, and Organizational Change.” American Journal of Sociology 102(2): 483-526.

23

Kreps, David. 1990. “Corporate Culture and Economic Theory.” Pp. 90-143 in Perspectives on Political Economy edited by James Alt and Kenneth Shepsle. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Milgrom, Paul and John Roberts. 1990. “Bargaining Costs, Influence Costs, and the Organization of Economic Activity.” Pp. 57-89 in Perspectives on Political Economy edited by James Alt and Kenneth Shepsle. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Corporate Hierarchies I: Market Failure Approaches Chandler, Alfred. 1990. “Scale, Scope and Organizational Capabilities.” Chapter 2 in Scale

and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Williamson, Oliver. 1981. “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 87: 548-77.

Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. “Reflections on the Commons.” Pp. 1-28 in Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Corporate Hierarchies II: Embeddedness and Institutional argument Roy, William. 1997. Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in

America. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Week 11. Social Capital Background Readings: Swedberg, Richard. 2003. The Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton

University Press. Chapter 9-10 Portes, Alejandro. 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern

Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1-24. Core Readings: Burt, Ronald. 1992. “The Social Structure of Competition.” pp.8-49 in Structural Holes:

The Social Structure of Competition by Ronald Burt. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Suggested Readings: Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 96-111 in The Sociology of Economic

Life, edited by Mark Granoveter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder: Westview Press. Coleman, James. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American

Journal of Sociology 94: S95-121. Putnam, Robert. 2000. “Thinking About Social Change,” Chapter 1, pp. 15-28 and “Toward

an Agenda for Social Capitalists, “ Chapter 24, pp. 402-414 in Bowling Alone: The

24

Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Scguster. Field, John. 2003. “From Metaphor to Concept.” Pp. 11-40 in Social Capital. London and

New York: Routledge. *This is a good text to provide background to the concepts of human and social capital. Fine, Ben. 2001. Social Capital versus Social Theory. London and New York: Routledge. Dasgupta, Partha. 1988. “Trust as a Commodity.” pp.49-72 in Trust: Making and Breaking

Cooperative Relations, edited by Diego Ganbetta. Oxford: Blackwell. Granovetter, Mark. 1993. “The Nature of Economic Relationships.” pp.3-41 in

Explorations in Economic Sociology, edited by Richard Swedberg. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

Light, Ivan and Stavros Karageoris. 1994. “The Ethnic Economy.” pp.647-671 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Nan, Lin. 1982. “Social Resources and Instrumental Action.” pp.131-146 in Soical Structure and Network Analysis, edited by Peter Marsden and Nan Lin. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Sable, Charles. 1993. “Studied Trust: Building New Forms of Cooperation in a Volatile Economy.” pp. 104-144 in Explorations in Economic Sociology, edited by Richard Swedberg. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Zucker, Lynn. 1986. “Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840-1920.” Research in Organizational Behavior 8: 53-111.

熊瑞梅、黃毅志，1992，〈社會資源與小資本階級〉，《中國社會學刊》第十六期，頁107-138。

趙蕙鈴，1995，〈協力生產網絡資源交換結構之特質：經濟資源交換的社會網絡化〉，《台灣社會學刊》第十八期，頁 75-115。

Week 12 (5/11) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. The overlap between economic sociology and organization is no accident, but rather results from the significant restructuring of one of the theoretical core of social sciences, namely the development of “institutionalism” and “institutional analysis”. This inter-disciplinary movement has a number of variants, but one of the most significant is found in the “new institutionalism in organizational analysis”. Economic sociology is the main site where variants of the new institutionalism confront one another. Indeed, the growing importance of economic sociology in the past decade has helped to revitalize organization theory. Background Readings: Scott, Richard. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Hills: Sage. Core Readings:

25

Meyer, John and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as a Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 340-362.

DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell. 1993. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147-160.

Questions to ponder: How does an institutional approach alter an embedded or s work process interpretation of economic and social organization? How are “the individual” and “self-control” conceptualized in institutional theory? How is power and domination conceptualized? Does institutional theory mark an unwitting return to theories of social organization? Suggested Readings: Nee, Victor. 1998. “Sources of the New Institutionalism.” Pp. 1-16 in The New

Institutionalism in Sociology, edited by Mary Brinton and Victor Nee. New York: Russell Sage.

Friedland Roger and Robert Alford. 1991. “Bringing the Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” Pp. 232-263 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Walter Powell and Paul DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

PART III: EXAMPLAR STUDIES

Week 13 (5/18) Fred Block: Postindustrial Possibilities Background Readings: Block, Fred, and Margaret Somers. 1984. “Beyond the Economistic Fallacy: The Holistic

Social Science of Karl Polanyi.” pp.47-84.in Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Core Readings: Block, Fred. 1990. Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse.

Berkeley: University of California Press. Suggested Readings: Block, Fred. 1996. The Vampire State: And Other Myths and Fallacies about the U.S.

Economy. New York: The New Press. Week 14 (5/25) AnnaLee Saxenian: Regional Advantage—

The Social Organization and Economic Performance of

26

Sectors Background Readings: Piore, Michael and Charles Sable. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for

Prosperity. New York: Basic Books. Core Readings: Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley

and Route 128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Suggested Readings: Kenney, Martin and U. von Burg. 1999. “Technology, Entrepreneurship and Path

dependence: Industrial Clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128.” Industrial and Corporate Change 8(1): 67-103.

Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1999. “Comments on Kenney, Martin and U. von Burg. ‘Technology, Entrepreneurship and Path dependence: Industrial Clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128.’” Industrial and Corporate Change 8(1): ????

Brusco, Sebasitiano. 1982. “The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralization and Social Integration.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 167-184.

Sabel, Charles. 1994. “Flexible Specialization and the Re-emergence of Regional Economies.” pp.101-156 in Post-Fordism: A Reader, edited by Ash Amin. Oxford UK and Cambridge,USA: Blackwell.

Becattini, G. 1990. “The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion.” pp.37-51 in Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Cooperation in Italy, edited by F. Pyke, G. Becattini, and W. Sengenberger. Geneva: International Institute fpr Labor Studies.

Granovetter, Mark. 1994. “Business Groups.” pp.453-475 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press

Lincoln, James and Michael Gerlach. 1996. “Keiretsu Networks and Corporate Performance in Japan.” American Sociological Review 61: 67-88.

Hollinsworth, Roger, Philippe Schmitter, and Wolfgang Streeck. 1994. “Capitalism, Sectors, Institutions, and Performance.” pp.3-16 in Governing Capitalist Economies: Performance and Control of Economic Sectors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kitschelt, Herbert. 1991. “Industrial Governance Structures, Innovation Strategies, and the Case of Japan: Sector or Cross-National Comparative Analysis?” International Organization 45: 453-93.

Week 15 (6/1) Viviana Zelizer: The Social Meaning of Money Background Readings: Zelizer, Viviana. 1979, Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the

27

United States. New York: Transaction Publishers. Core Readings: Zelizer, Viviana. 1994. The Social Meaning of Money: Pin Money, Paychecks,Poor Relief,

and Other Currencies. New York: Basic Books. Suggested Readings: Zelizer, Viviana. 1985. Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Meaning of Child.

Princeton: Princeton University Press. Week 16 (6/8) Charles Lindblom: The Market System Background Readings: Swedberg, Richard. 1994. “Markets as Social Structure.” pp.255-82 in The Handbook of

Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Core Readings: Lindblom, Charles. 2001. The Market System: What It Is, How It Works, and What to

Make of It. New Heavens: Yale University Press. Suggested Readings: Lindblom, Charles. 1977. Politcs and markets: The World’s Political-Economic System.

New York: Basic Books. Week 17 (6/15) Wrap-up and Reflection No additional reading Week 18 (6/22) Final Exam (No Class)

PART IV. SUPPLEMENTARY TOPICS I. Class Analysis and Exploitation Cohen, G. A. 1978. Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defense. Princeton: Princeton

University Press. Chapter 3 “The Economic Structure” pp.63-87. Romer, John. 1981. “New Directions in the Marxian Theory of Class and Exploitation.”

Politics and Society 11: 253-287. Wright, Erik. 1994. Interrogating Inequality. London: Verso. Chapter 2 “The Class Analysis

of Poverty.” Pp.32-60

28

Wright. Erik. 1998. Class Counts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. II. The Sociology of Labor Markets England, Paula and George Farkas. 1986. Households, Employment and Gender:A Social

Economic and Demographic View. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Chapter 6, “The Employment Relationship”, pp.123-45

Granovetter, Mark. 1992. “The Sociological and Economic Approaches to Labor Market Analysis: A Social Structure View.” in The Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Mark Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder:Westview Press.

Hage, Jerald. 1989. “The Sociology of Traditional Economic Problems: Product Markets and Labor Markets.” Work and Occupations16: 416-45.

Kalleberg, Arhne and Aage Sorensen. 1979. “The Sociology of Labor Markets.” Annual Review of Sociology 5: 351-79.

謝國雄，1997，《純勞動：台灣勞動體制諸論》，台北：中研院社會所。 謝國雄，1994，〈勞動力是什麼樣的商品？——計件制與台灣勞動者主體性之形塑〉，

《台灣社會研究季刊》第十七期，頁 83-120。 戴伯芬，1994，〈誰做攤販？——台灣攤販的歷史形構〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第十

七期，頁 121-148。 王宏仁，2001，〈社會階層化下的婚姻移民與國內勞動市場：以越南新娘為例〉，《台 灣社會研究季刊》第四十一期，頁99-127。

許甘霖，2000，〈放任與壓制之外——政治化薪資形構初探〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》 第三十八期，頁1-58。

曾嬿芬，1997，〈居留權的商品化：台灣的商業移民市場〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第二十七期，頁 37-67。

黃毅志，2001，〈台灣地區勞力市場分割之探討：流動表分析〉，《台灣社會學刊》第二十五期，頁 157-199。

張晉芬、李奕慧，2001，〈台灣中高齡離職者的勞動參與和再就業：對台汽與中石化的事件史分析〉，《台灣社會學》第一期，頁 113-147。

蔡明璋、陳嘉慧，1997，〈國家、外勞政策與市場實踐：經濟社會學的分析〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第二十七期，頁 69-95。

劉梅君，2000，〈「廉價外勞」論述的政治經濟學批判〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第三十八期，頁 59-90。

鄭怡雯，2002，〈誰來上崗：中國城市勞動力市場的不平等競爭〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第四十八期，頁 45-94。

蔡瑞明、林大森，2002，〈滾石不生苔？台灣勞力市場中的工作經歷對薪資的影響〉， 台灣社會學刊》第二十九期，頁57-95。

劉 正、Arthur Sakamoto，2002，〈學校教育在台灣勞動市場中扮演的角色：人力資本，篩選機制，或文憑主義？〉，《台灣社會學刊》第二十九期，頁 1-56。

29

III. The New Institutionalism Meyer, John and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structures as

Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 340-63. DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional

Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147-160.

Whitley, Richard. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scott, Richard. 2004. “Competing Logics in Healthcare: Professional, State, and Managerial.” Pp. 267-287 in The Sociology of the Economy, edited by Frank Dobbin. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Haveman, Heather. 1993. “Follow the Leader: Mimetic Isomorphism and Entry into New Markets.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 593-627.

IV. Contracts Williamson, Oliver. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.

Chapter 2, “Contractual Man” and Chapter 3, “The Governance of Contractual Relations”, pp.43-84.

Akerloff, George. 1986. “Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange.” pp. 66-92 in Efficiency Wage Models of the Labor Market, edited by George Akerloff and J. L. Yellen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Commons, John. 1924. “Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: MacMillian. Chapter 8, “The Wage Bargain--Industrialism”, pp.283-312.

Dore, Ronald. 1992. “Goodwill and the Spirit of Market Capitalism.” Pp.159-180 in The Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Mark Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder: Westview Press.

Macauley, Stewart. 1992. “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study.” pp. 265-283 in The Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Mark Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. Boulder: Westview Press.

Streeck, Wolfgang. 1992. Social Institutions and Economic Performance: Studies of Industrial Relations in Advanced capitalist Economies. London: Sage. Chapter 2, “Revisiting Status and Contract: Pluralism, Corporatism, and Flexibility.” pp.41-75.

V. Economic Systems: Historical and Taxonomic Variations Edwards, Richard, Michael Reich and Thomas Weisskopf. 1986. The Capitalist System.

New York: Prentice Hall, pp.4-20, 39-56. Bell, Daniel. 1976. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books, pp.

ix-xxii, 47-119. Lindblom, Charles. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books, pp. 3-62.

30

Lash, Scott and John Urry. 1987. The End of Organized Capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Pp. 10-63.

Hollinsworth, J. Rogers. 1997. “Coordination of Economic Actors and Social Systems of Production.” pp. 1-47 in Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions, edited by J. Rogers Hollinsworth and Robert Boyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kitschelt, Herbert, et. al. 1999. “Convergence and Divergence in Advanced Capitalist Democracies.” pp.427-460 in Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by Herbert Kischelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John Stephens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

夏鑄九，1995，〈全球經濟中的台灣城市與社會〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第二十期，頁 57-102。

徐進鈺，1999，〈流動的鑲嵌：新竹科學工業園區的勞動力市場與高科技發展〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第三十五期，頁 75-118。

陳冠甫，1990，〈台灣高科技工業的依賴發展與空間結構－新竹科學園區的個案〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第三卷第一期，頁 113-149。

Pine II, B. Joseph., & Gilmore, James H. 1999. The Experience Economy: work is theatre & every business a stage. 夏業良、魯煒譯，2003，《體驗經濟時代》，台北：經 濟新潮社。

Beck, Ulrich Beck. 2000. What is Globalization? Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA:Polity. 中譯：孫治本譯. 全球化危機：全球化的形成，風險與機會，台北：商務。

Coyle, Diane著，羅漢等譯，2000，《無重量世界：科技和創意主導的年代》，台北：先覺。

Soto, Hernando de. 2000. The Mystery of Capital. 王曉冬譯，《資本的秘密》，台北：經濟新潮社。

Rifkin, Jeremy. 2000. The Age of Access. 黃彥憲譯，2001，《付費體驗的時代：超資本主義新紀元：使用權取代所有權》，台北：遠流。

VI. The “Regulation School.” and “Social Structure of Accumulation” Brenner, Robert and M. Glick. 1990. “The Regulation Approach: Theory and History.” New

Left Review 188: 45-119 Jessop, Bob. 1990. “Regulation Theories in Retrospect and Prospect.” Economy and

Society 19: 153-216. Boyer, Robert. 1990. The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia

University Press. Lipietz, Alain. 1986. “New Tendencies in the International Division of Labor: Regimes of

Accumulation and Modes of Regulation.” pp. 16-40 in Production, Work, Technology: The Geographical Anatomy of Industrial Capitalism. Boston: Allen & Unwin.

Aglietta, M. 1979. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation. London: New Left Review Books.

31

Kotz, David, Terrence McDonough, and Michael Reich, eds. 1994. Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Amable, Bruno. 2000. “Institutional Complementarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production.” Review of International Political Economy 7(4): 645-687.

王振寰、黃書緯，2001，〈從社會主義城市到世界城市：上海城市調節機制的轉型〉，《台灣社會學刊》第二十六期，頁 55-104。

VII. Globalization and Regionalization Held, David, et.al. 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture.

Stanford: Stanford University Press. Gereffi, Gary. 1998. “Commodity Chains and Regional Divisions of Labor in East Asia.”

pp. 93-124 in The Four Asian Tigers: Economic Development and the Global Political Economy, edited by Eum Mee Kim. San Diego: Academic Press.

Oman, Charles. 1994. Globalization and Regionalization: The Challenge for Developing Countries. Paris: OECD

Ross, Robert and Kent Trachte. 1990. Global Capitalism: The New Leviathan. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Hirst, Paul and Grahame Thompson. 1996. Globalization in Question. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Stallings, Barbara. 1995. Global Change, Regional Response: The New International Context of Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Storper, Michael. 1997. The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. New York: The Guilford Press.

Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Information Age: Economy, Society, Culture. 3 volumes. Oxford: Blackwell.

Dicken, Peter. 2003. Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21th Century. 4th Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.

Kanter, Rosabeth Moss.1995. World class: thriving locally in the global economy. 林添貴譯，1999，《世界級：區域性企業也能競逐全球》。台北：先覺。

Fine, Charles H. 1998. Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of TemporaryAdvantage.，李 筠譯，2000，《脈動速度下的決策者》，台北：大塊。

瞿宛文，2003，《全球化下的台灣經濟》，台北：台灣社會研究叢刊11。 王振寰，1997，〈跨國界區域經濟形成的統理機制：以台灣資本外移南中國為例〉，《台

灣社會研究季刊》第二十七期，頁 1-36。 王振寰，1999，〈全球化，在地化與學習型區域：理論反省與重建〉，《台灣社會研究 季刊》第三十四期，頁69-112。

王振寰、高士欽，2000，〈全球化與在地化：新竹與台中的學習型區域比較〉，《台灣 社會學刊》第二十四期，頁179-237。

32

王振寰，2002，〈東亞「世界城市」的不同路徑：漢城與台北〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第四十七期，頁 85-139。

王振寰，2004，〈全球化與後進國家：兼論東亞的發展路徑與轉型〉，《台灣社會學刊》第三十一期，頁 1-45。

邢幼田，1996，〈台商與中國大陸地方官僚聯盟——一個新的跨國投資模式〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第二十三期，頁 159-182。

陳志柔，2001，〈中國大陸農村財產權制度變遷的地方制度基礎：閩南與蘇南的地區差異〉，《台灣社會學》第二期，頁 219-262。

趙 剛，2001，〈為什麼反全球化？如何反？——關於全球化的一些問題的思考與對話〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第四十四期，頁 49-146。

VIII. “Mass Production” and “Flexibility” Piroe, Michael and Charles Sabel. 1984. The Second Industry Divide: Possibilities for

Prosperity. New York: Basic Books. Chapters 1, 2, 4 and 6. Elam, Mark. 1994. “Puzzling out the Post-Fordist Debate: Technology, Markets and

Institutions.” pp.43-70 in Post-Fordism: A Reader, edited by Ash Amin.Oxford UK & Cambridge USA: Blackwell.

Hirst, Paul and Jonathan Zeitlin. 1990. “Flexible Specialization vs. Post-Fordism; Theory, Evidence and Policy Implications.” pp.70-115 in Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development, edited by Michael Storper and Allen Scott. London: Routledge.

Amin, Ash. 1989. “Flexible Specialization and Small Firms in Italy: Myths and Realities.” Antipode 21: 13-43.

Harrison, Bennett. 1997. Lean and Mean: Why Large Corporations Will Continue to Dominate the Global Economy. New York and London: Guilfod Press.

Vallas, Steven. 1999. “Rethinking Post-Fordism: The Meaning of Workplace Flexibility.” Sociological Theory 17(1): 68-101.

Harrison, Bennett. 1994. Lean and Mean. 李昭瑢譯，1997，《組織瘦身：二十一世紀跨國企業生產型態的蛻變》。台北：遠流。

IX. Associations: Labor Relations, Communities of Learning and Technology Innovations Hicks, Alexander and Lane Kenworthy. 1998. “Cooperation and Political Economic

Performance in Affluent Democratic Capitalism.” American Journal of Sociology 103: 1631-1672.

Crouch, Colin. 1985. “Conditions for Trade Union Wage Restraint.” Pp. 105-39 in The Politics of Inflation and Economic Stagnation, edited by Leon Lindberg and Charles Maire. Washington DC: Brookings.

33

Berk, Gerald. 1996. “Communities of Competitors: Open Price Associations and the American State.” Social Science History 20(3): 375-400.

Rosenkopf Lori and Michael Tushman. 1998. “The Coevolution of Community Networks and Technology: Lessons from the Flight Simulation Industry.” Industrial and Corporate Change 7: 311-46.

王佳煌，2001，〈評「知識經濟—兼論台灣的國家發展策略」，《台灣社會研究季刊四十四期，頁 201-241.

X. What Is a Price? How Are They Constructed? How Are They Interpreted? Uzzi, Brian and Ryon Lancaster. 2004. “Embeddedness and Price Formation in the

Corporate Law Market.” American Sociological Review 69: 319-344. Veithuis, Olav. 2003. “Symbolic Meanings of Prices: Constructing the Value of

Contemporary Art in Amsterdam and New York Galleries.” Theory and Society 32: 181-215.

Zajac, Edward and James Westphal. 2004. “The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions.” American Sociological Review 69: 433-457.

Smith, Charles. 1989. Auctions: The Social Construction of Value. New York: Free Press. Zelizer, Viviana. 1985. Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Meaning of Child.

Princeton: Princeton University Press. Baker, Wayne. 1984. “The Social Structure of a National Securities Market.” American

Journal of Sociology 89: 775-811. Podolny, Joel and Marya Hill-Popper. 2004. “Hedonic and Transcendent Conceptions of

Value.” Industrial and Corporate Change 13(1): 91-116. XI. Global Commodity Chains, Global Production, Global Markets Gereffi, Gary. 1994. “The Organization of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How

U.S. Retailers Shape Overseas Production Networks.” Pp. 95-122 in Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, edited by Gary Gereffi and Miguel Korzeniewicz. London: Praeger.

Gereffi, Gary. 1998. “Commodity Chains and Regional Divisions of Labor in East Asia.” Pp. 93-124 in The Four Asian Tigers: Economic Development and the Global Political Economy, edited by Eun Mee Kim. San Diego: Academic Press.

Gereffi, Gary and Miguel Korzeniewicz., eds. 1994. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport: Praeger.

Bonacich, Edna et. al. , eds. 1994. Global Production: The Apparel Industry in the Pacific Rim. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Gereffi, Gary, John Humphrey, and Timothy Sturgeon. Forthcoming. “The Governance of Global Value Chains: An Analytical Framework.” Review of International Political

34

Economy. McKendrick, David, Richard Doner, and Stephan Haggard. 2000. From Silicon Valley to

Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Borrus, Michael, Dieter Ernst, and Stephan Haggard. 2000. “Introduction: Cross-border Production Networks and the Industrial Integration of the Asia-Pacific Region.” Pp. 1-30 in International Production Networks in Asia: Rivalry or Riches? edited by Michael Borrus, Dieter Ernst, and Stephan Haggard. London and New York: Routledge.

Ernst, Dieter and John Ravenhill. 2000. “Convergence and Diversity: How Globalization Reshapes Asian Production Networks.” Pp. 226-256 in Asia: Rivalry or Riches? Edited by Michael Borrus, Dieter Ernst, and Stephan Haggard. London and New York: Routledge.

黃慧琦，2003，《條碼的秘密：連鎖零售業如何改變我們的生活？》，台北：左岸。 Fine, Charles H. 1998. Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary

Advantage.，李筠譯，2000，《脈動速度下的決策者》，台北：大塊。 XII. Financial Capitalism John Zysman. 1984. Governments, Markets and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics

of Industrial Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Mizruchi, Mark and Linda Brewster Stearns. 1994. “Money, Banking, and Financial

Markets.” Pp. 313-341 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil Smelser and Robert Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Carruthers, Bruce. 1996. City of Capital: politics and Markets in the English Financial Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Useem, Michael. 1993. Executive Defense: Shareholder Power and Corporate Reorganization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Khurana, Rakesh. 2002. Searching for a Corporate Savior: The Irrational Quest for Charismatic CEOs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Lounsbury, Michael. 2002. “Institutional Transformation and Status Mobility: The Professionalization of the Fields of Finance.” Academy of Management Journal 45(1): 255-266.

Zuckerman, Ezra. 2000. “Focusing the Corporate Product: Securities Analysts and De-Diversification.” Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 591-619.

吳泉源，1993，〈金融自由化的迷思——一個經濟社會學的考察〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第十五期，頁1-38。

李庸三、陳上程，1995，〈台灣金融發展之回顧〉，許家棟編《台灣貨幣與金融論文集》，頁3-42，台北：聯經。

Useem, Michael. 1996. Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers Are Changing the Face

35

of Corporate America. 溫蒂雅譯，1998，《罷黜董事長：投資人改造企業新趨勢》，台北：商周。

Hertz, Noreena. 2001. The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy. 許玉雯譯，2003，《當企業購併國家：全球資本主義與民主之死》。台北：經濟新潮社。

後藤靖、蘆田文夫、板本和一編，黃紹恆譯，2003，《現代經濟史的基礎：資本主義的生成、發展與危機》。

黃仁宇，1991，《資本主義與二十一世紀》，台北：聯經。 林寶安，2002，〈台灣消費金融的演變及其社會經濟意義〉，《台灣社會學刊》第二十

七期，頁 107-162。 康涵真，1994，〈關係運作與法律的邊緣化——台灣中小企業非正式融資活動的研

究〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》第十七期，頁 1-40。 陳介玄，2002，〈從工業到金融社會的轉型〉，收綠於王振寰編《台灣社會》，頁 135-164，

台北：巨流。 陳玉璽著，2002，〈台灣經驗對經濟理論的挑戰—資本累積理論的重新詮釋〉，收錄

於《從金融風暴到全球危機：新典範轉移的觀點》，頁 201-217，宜蘭：佛光人文社會學院。

XIII. Consumption Bourdieu, Piere. 1977. Distinction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Lubar, S. and W. D. Kinery, eds. 1993. History from Things. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press. Slater, Don. 1997. Consumer Culture and Modernity. New York: Routledge. Douglas, Mary. 2004. The Worlds of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption.

New York: Routledge. Elias, Nobert. 1978. The History of Manners. New York: Pantheon. Simmel, Georg. 1990. The Philosophy of Money. New York: Pantheon. Bocock, Robert. 1993. Consumption. New York: Routledge. Baudrillard, Jean. 1998. The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. London: Sage. 葉啟政，2002，〈生產的政治經濟學到消費的文化經濟學：從階級作為施為機制的角

度來考察〉，《台灣社會學刊》第二十八期，頁 153-200。 李玉瑛，1999，〈實現你的明星夢：台灣婚紗照的消費文化分析〉，《台灣社會研究季

刊》第三十六期，頁 147-186。

36